Closed-Loop Geothermal Demonstration Project

1y ago
12 Views
2 Downloads
3.22 MB
71 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jayda Dunning
Transcription

California Energy CommissionCONSULTANT REPORTClosed-Loop GeothermalDemonstration ProjectConfirming Models for Large-Scale, Closed-LoopGeothermal Projects in CaliforniaPrepared by: GreenFire Energy Inc.Gavin Newsom, GovernorJune 2020 CEC-300-2020-007

California Energy CommissionPrimary Authors:Joseph A. SchererBrian HigginsJohn R. MuirAlvaro AmayaGreenFire Energy Inc.4300 Horton Street, Unit 15Emeryville, CA 94608(888) 320-2721www.greenfireenergy.comContract Number: GEO-16-004Prepared for:California Energy CommissionElisabeth de JongCommission Agreement ManagerArmand AnguloAssistant Deputy DirectorRENEWABLE ENERGY DIVISIONNatalie LeeDeputy DirectorRENEWABLE ENERGY DIVISIONDrew BohanExecutive DirectorDISCLAIMERThis report was prepared as the result of work sponsoredby the California Energy Commission. It does notnecessarily represent the views of the CEC, its employees,or the State of California. The CEC, the State of California,its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make nowarrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liabilityfor the information in this report; nor does any partyrepresent that the uses of this information will not infringeupon privately owned rights. This report has not beenapproved or disapproved by the California EnergyCommission, nor has the California Energy Commissionpassed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information inthis report.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSGreenFire Energy would like to acknowledge funding for this demonstration from the CaliforniaEnergy Commission, the Shell Game Changer Program, the Electric Power Research Institute,and J-POWER. Surface and downhole engineering was performed by Veizades & Associates,Inc. The Coso Operating Company, with the cooperation of the U.S. Navy GeothermalProgram, made substantial in-kind contributions to the project and provided essential onsiteservices.i

PREFACEThe California Energy Commission’s Geothermal Grant and Loan Program is funded by theGeothermal Resources Development Account providing funding to local jurisdictions andprivate entities for a variety of geothermal projects.This report on the Closed-Loop Geothermal Demonstration Project is the final report for theGeothermal Grant and Loan Program Agreement Number GEO-16-004, completed byGreenFire Energy Inc. The information from this project contributes to the overall goals of theGeothermal Grant and Loan Program to: Promote the use and development of California’s vast geothermal energy resources.Address any adverse impacts caused by geothermal development.Help local jurisdictions offset the costs of providing public services necessitated bygeothermal development.ii

ABSTRACTThe project team investigated using a closed-loop heat extraction technology to unlock thevast geothermal regions of California that cannot be accessed by conventional hydrothermalsystems due to insufficient water and subsurface permeability. The project team installed andmeasured the performance of a downbore heat exchanger in a field-scale closed-loopgeothermal power system. Water and supercritical carbon dioxide were circulated in thesystem as alternatives for transporting heat to the surface where power generation wassimulated.The team conducted onsite testing in May and December 2019 using Well 34-A20 in Coso(Inyo County, California). Construction included the insertion of 1,083 feet of vacuuminsulated tubing inside a liner that was plugged at the bottom to form the downbore heatexchanger.The tests consisted of circulating the selected fluid while varying the flow rate and workingfluid injection conditions. The team measured output temperature and pressure.Testing with water as the working fluid created enough steam potential to generate 1.2megawatts of gross electric power and conformed well to the modeled prediction. Equallyimportant, project testing clearly demonstrated that downbore heat exchangers can producepower from inactive wells.Next, GreenFire circulated supercritical CO2 in the downbore heat exchanger while coproducingbrine to the surface. This test sought to verify GreenFire Energy’s supercritical CO2 processmodeling techniques and illustrate the potential for power generation where conditionsprevent the use of conventional hydrothermal technology.The results confirmed the utility of a supercritical CO2 closed-loop system to harvest heat inhot, dry rock. The research suggests 1) commercial projects may now be considered using thetechnology to retrofit existing underperforming geothermal wells and 2) new wells can beconsidered for drilling to depth in hot, dry rock at field-scale for commercial power production.Keywords: California Energy Commission, GreenFire Energy, closed-loop, supercritical CO2,Vacuum Insulated Tubing, Coso, noncondensable gasesScherer, Joseph, Brian Higgins, John Muir, and Alvaro Amaya (GreenFire Energy Inc.). 2020.Closed-Loop Geotherm al Dem onstration Project. California Energy Commission.Publication Number: CEC-300-2020-007.iii

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTSClosed-Loop Geothermal Demonstration Project . iAcknowledgements . iPreface . iiAbstract . iiiTable of Contents . vList of Figures . viiList of Tables. viiiExecutive Summary . Error! Bookmark not defined.Introduction . 1Project Purpose 2Objectives .3Testing overview . 3Conclusions and Recommendations .3Benefits to California .3CHAPTER 1: Developing Geothermal Energy in California . 5What Is Geothermal Energy? . . 5California Has Abundant Geothermal Resources 5California Is a Leader in Geothermal Energy Production . 6How Is Geothermal Power Currently Produced? .6Conventional Hydrothermal . 7Engineered Geothermal Systems . 7Why Has Geothermal Development in California Dramatically Slowed Down?. . 7Closed-Loop Geothermal Is Important to California’s Energy Future . .8Expanding the Scope and Efficiency of Geothermal Power Generation .8Additional Advantages of Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems .9Efficiency, Flexibility, and Scalability .9Grid Balancing Capability . 9Environmental Advantages . 9Unique and Superior Resiliency and Security . .9CHAPTER 2: Project Overview. 10Project Scope . . 10Project Steps . 10Preliminary WellAssessment . .10Agreement with Coso OperatingCompany . .10v

Permitting . . 10Contract with Veizades & Associates as Project Manager . .11Detailed Well Assessment . .11Engineering and System Design . .11Procurement . .11Construction . .11Testing . .12Chapter 3: Project Design, Construction, and Equipment. 14Setting and Equipment Layout . . 14Downbore Heat Exchanger . . 15Chapter 4: Tests Conducted with Water as the Transport and Working Fluid . 18Testing Procedures .19Well Flow Modeling and Measurements .21Optimization . 24Conclusions of Testing with Water as the Transport and Working Fluid . 25Chapter 5: Tests Conducted with sCO2 as the Transport and Working Fluid . 26Overview . 26Fluid Flows . . 26Process Flow Diagram . . 27Control Parameters . . 28Process Modeling for sCO2 as Working Fluid .29Modeling the Surface Equipment .29Closed-Loop Modeling .29Results for sCO2 as the Working Fluid .30Well Flow Data . . 32Well Flow Data During Closed-Loop DBHX Demonstration While Flowing sCO2 .33Well Flow Modeling 35Demonstration Results Versus Modeling .36Retesting sCO2 as the Working Fluid .37Well Flow Data during Closed-Loop DBHX Demonstration While Flowing sCO2 .37Modeling Injection Temperature and Deeper Wells 39Zero Well Flow Data . .40Field-Scale Application of Closed-Loop Geothermal Development .41Conclusions of sCO2 Testing . . 46Chapter 6: Conclusions and Recommendations . 48Conclusions . . 48Validation of GreenFire Proprietary Models for Closed-loop Geothermal Wells .48Validation of Closed-loop Geothermal Wells for Well Rehabilitation . . 49Benefits to California . 49vi

Recommendations for Additional Work 49Next Steps . 50REFERENCES . 51Glossary. 52APPENDIX: Information on Modeling . A-1Modeling with Monte Carlo Simulations .A-1LIST OF : Comparison of Conventional Geothermal vs. Closed-loop Geothermal . 22: Map of California Geothermal Resources . 63: Equipment Pad and Partial Installation . 124: Installation of Vacuum-insulated Tubing . 125: Installation at Well 34-A20 at Coso . 146: Surface Equipment Layout . 157: DBHX Well Schematic. 168: DBHX Process Flow with Water . 189: Wellhead Pressure and Temperature vs.Total Well Pressure . 2010: Power potential for Water Flash to Steam vs. Wellhead . 2111: Temperature and Pressure vs. Depth for Measured and Modeled Data . 2212: Temperature and Pressure vs. Depth for One Test Case . 2313: Steam Quality vs. Depth . 2314: Power Predictions vs. Measurements . 2415: Power Estimates Using Monte Carlo Simulation and 1-D Modeling . 2516: Well Flow Schematic . 2717: Process Flow Diagram for sCO2 . 2818: sCO2 Injected into the Well Just After Opening . 2919: Wellhead Temperature and Pressure vs. Well Flow . 3220: Wellhead Temperature and Pressure vs. Three Flow Rates . 3321: Power Production vs. Increased Temperature and Pressure . 3422: Temperature and Pressure vs Depth for One Test Case . 3523: sCO2 Power Production vs Flowrate . 3624: Predicted Pressure and Temperature vs. Measured Values . 3625: Well Head Temperature and Pressure vs. Flow Rates . 3826: Power Production vs. Increased Temperature and Pressure . 3827: Estimated Power Production with Amended Conditions . 3928: Predicted Temperature, Pressure, and Density . 3929: Power Generation with Zero Flow . 4130: Single Well with Coaxial Tube Configuration . 4231: U-Loop Well Configuration . 4332: Hockey Stick Well Configuration . 44vii

FigureFigureFigureFigureFigure33: Power Potential Plotted Versus Horizontal Length without Convection . 4534: Approximate Coso Geothermal Resource Isotherm vs. Depth . 4635: PCA Analysis for Water as Working Fluid . A-336: PCA Analysis of sCO2 as the Working Fluid . A-537:Monte Carlo Simulation and 1-D Modeling . A-7LIST OF TABLESPageTable 1 Test Cases. .19Table 2 Well and Closed-loop Test Settings 32Table 3 Well and Closed-Loop Test Settings .37Table 4. List of PCA Variables A-1viii

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYIntroductionDespite rapidly rising demand for renewable energy and the abundance of geothermalresources in California, geothermal power generation is declining. Figures compiled by theCalifornia Energy Commission (CEC) show that gigawatt-hours generated between 2001 and2018 decreased (13,525 vs. 11,528), mainly because of natural well degradation and thedearth of new geothermal projects. This paradox is clear evidence of a fundamental problemthat prevents the geothermal industry from expanding to meet the twin demands of cleanpower generation and grid balancing for intermittent power.Geothermal power generation in California is severely restricted with conventional“hydrothermal” technology, which requires abundant water and highly permeable subsurfacerock structures. Because sites with the rare combination of sufficient heat, water andpermeability have already been developed, such combinations are increasingly difficult to find.In short, the lack of geothermal sites with the necessary conditions has effectively limited thenumber of sites that can be developed with conventional technology. Further, conventionalgeothermal development is hampered by an unattractive business model characterized by highupfront risk, an extremely long period before revenue is generated, and only modest return oninvestment.Reinvigorating geothermal development in California will require a substantially differenttechnology and a better business model. To address these interrelated problems, GreenFireEnergy has developed a “closed-loop” geothermal power technology that eliminates the needfor subsurface permeability and large quantities of water. Closed-loop geothermal involves thecreation of a sealed well traversing the subsurface rock strata through which heat transportfluid can freely circulate. Because no fluid is lost in a closed system, obtaining environmentalpermits is less expensive and time consuming. Closed loops further make possible the use ofalternative heat transport fluids, such as supercritical CO2, that can be used to reduce thepower otherwise consumed by pumping water through the system.Figure 1 depicts the difference between conventional hydrothermal systems and closed-loopsystems. The diagram on the left illustrates how most hydrothermal projects depend on largeamounts of water flowing down an injection well, then through highly permeable rock tocollect and transport heat, and then into a production well that conducts the hot water to thesurface. The closed-loop system, depicted in the right panel, does not need subsurfacepermeability because there is a sealed, engineered pipe that conducts the heat transport fluidthrough the rock strata and then up to the surface. Closed-loop systems have two immediateadvantages. First, they make possible the use of alternative heat transport fluids that may besuperior to water under various conditions. Second, closed-loop systems can access heat fromhigh-temperature resources (where permeability is generally very limited), which translatesinto more efficient power generation.1

Figure 1: Comparison of Conventional Geothermal vs. Closed-loop GeothermalSource: GreenFire EnergyThis report describes the first field-scale test of closed-loop geothermal power generationtechnology. To date, the primary obstacle to the success of closed-loop geothermal technologyhas been the lack of a field demonstration. Though mathematical modeling predicts success,“real-world” operation is required to attract funding for field-scale commercialization. Thisdemonstration project is valuable in overcoming the final obstacles to commercial developmentnot only of well rehabilitation projects but, more importantly, field-scale, closed-loopgeothermal projects using wells drilled into hot, dry rock.Project PurposeAlthough previous modeling by GreenFire indicated that resources with hot, dry rock can beeconomically developed using closed-loop heat extraction technologies, this indication had yetto be proven.Accordingly, the project goal was to prove that a closed-loop geothermal power plant usingsupercritical CO2 can operate successfully at field scale. The project team used measurementstaken during the testing to validate and improve GreenFire’s thermodynamic models of closedloop geothermal projects. These models will be essential to expanding significantly California’sgeothermal industry to the hot, dry rock regions that are inaccessible with currenthydrothermal technology.The project consisted of a field-scale demonstration of a closed-loop geothermal system usinga downbore heat exchanger (DBHX) to extract heat. A downbore heat exchanger is a tube-intube assembly inserted into a geothermal well to circulate a fluid that absorbs heat fortransport to the surface. The project team evaluated heat extraction using water andsupercritical CO2 as alternative heat transport fluids. The team took careful measurements ofeach experiment to build a dataset to guide development of field-scale, closed-loopgeothermal projects in California. Further, because the project was conducted using an2

existing but idle geothermal well, this project demonstrated that many inactive geothermalwells in California can be restored to productivity.ObjectivesThe specific project objectives were to: Use an underperforming hydrothermal well at the Coso known geothermal resourcearea.Design, build, and operate a closed-loop technology demonstration plant.Collect enough data to guide development of commercial closed-loop projects.Testing OverviewIn independent tests, water and supercritical CO2 were circulated through a 330-meter, tubein-tube downbore heat exchanger hung from the wellhead. During testing, the team“coproduced” a mixture of brine and steam to the surface along the surface of the DBHX toincrease convective heat flow. The team coproduced brine at four flow rates (including zeroflow), while alternatively circulating water and supercritical CO2 inside the DBHX at differentflow settings.Conclusions and RecommendationsThe results obtained from this test lead to the following conclusions: Closed-loop technology using supercritical CO2 as the transport fluid shows promisefor large-scale geothermal projects in hot, dry geothermal resources.Water can also be effectively used in some closed-loop systems as a transport fluid inhot, dry geothermal resources.Closed-loop systems can restore some idle wells to productivity.Additional research and field-scale demonstration should be done with supercriticalCO2, other refrigerants, and water to optimize closed-loop geothermal architectureand handling procedures.Benefits to CaliforniaSenate Bill 100 (De León, Chapter 312, Statutes of 2018) creates a mandate for California totransition to clean energy resources instead of fossil fuels. With closed-loop geothermaltechnology, geothermal can play an important part in that transition while providing baseloadgeneration, which improves grid reliability and supports increasing amounts of intermittentrenewable energy resources. In May 2019 the California Public Utilities Commission set atarget of an additional 2,500 megawatts (MW) of geothermal capacity by 2030.At present, however, growth is limited due to a scarcity of geothermal sites that have enoughwater and permeability for conventional “open-loop” projects. In other words, furtherdevelopment of California’s geothermal resources requires a technology that doesn’t dependon water or subsurface permeability.Because closed-loop geothermal technology overcomes both these limitations, it is crucial tothe expansion of the enormous geothermal resources in California that remain undeveloped.3

This project demonstrates that closed-loop geothermal technology, using water or alternativeheat transport fluids, can enable California to provide renewable, baseload, or flexible poweron a larger scale.4

CHAPTER 1:Developing Geothermal Energy in CaliforniaWhat Is Geothermal Energy?Geothermal energy is the largest potential source of renewable and continuous energy onearth and offers at least two magnitudes more energy than coal, gas, and oil combined. Awell-known study by scientists at Idaho National Laboratory concluded that using just 2percent of the geothermal energy potential in the United States would be enough to supply allcurrent U.S. power consumption for 2,500 years. 1Geothermal energy is the natural heat created at the earth’s core by the decay of radioactiveelements. That heat flows upward toward the surface through the movement of molten rock.In known geothermal resource areas (KGRAs) molten rock or steam reaches the surface in theform of volcanoes, hot springs, steam vents, or mud pots. However, because geothermalregions composed of hot, dry rock often exhibit no surface manifestations, an estimated 70percent of geothermal resources have yet to be discovered.For more than 100 years, and in many regions of the world, geothermal heat has beenconverted to electric power. This usage is distinguished from “direct use,” where geothermalheat can also be used directly for such purposes as warming buildings, agricultural hot houses,or even public swimming poolsCalifornia Has Abundant Geothermal ResourcesDue to its location on the Pacific Ocean's famous "ring of fire" and residing over tectonic plateconjunctions, California contains the largest amount of geothermal electric generation capacityin the United States. In 2018, geothermal energy in California produced 11,528 gigawatt-hours(GWh) of electricity. Combined with another 700 GWh of imported geothermal power,geothermal energy produced 5.91 percent of the state's total system power. There are 43operating geothermal power plants in California with an installed capacity of 2,730 megawatts(MW).1 The Future of Geothermal Energy – Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the21st Century; Idaho National Laboratory, 2006.5

Figure 2: Map of California Geothermal ResourcesSource: California Energy CommissionCalifornia Is a Leader in Geothermal Energy ProductionAlthough the first geothermal power generation project was developed in Italy in the early1900s, California developed the world’s largest geothermal project at The Geysers starting inthe 1970s and continued to add projects rapidly through the end of the century.As Figure 2 indicates, many parts of California contain geothermal resources. Other than TheGeysers, the largest concentrations are in the Salton Sea area in extreme Southern Californiaand in the volcanic regions around Mammoth Mountain and at Coso.Consequently, California has been the center of the global geothermal industry, with many ofthe leading geothermal engineering companies located in the state. Nevertheless, because ofmarket conditions and the dearth of new geothermal projects in California contrasted with newopportunities in other regions, much of that expertise is being employed overseas.How Is Geothermal Power Produced?Using conventional methods, efficient power generation requires a geothermal resource of atleast 302 F (150 C). Although there are many geothermal features on the surface, such asgeysers, hot springs, and mud pots, these are rarely sufficiently large and hot for efficientpower generation. Consequently, conventional geothermal power generation requires moving6

subterranean heat upward from 1 to 4 kilometers deep using water as the heat transportmechanism.All conventional hydrothermal projects require geothermal reservoirs, and the most productivehave a large supply of hot water trapped in a geothermal reservoir. To tap the water found ingeothermal reservoirs, developers drill wells that are generally 1 to 3 kilometers deep.Conventional HydrothermalHeat is extracted by production wells that may produce hot water through natural pressure orby pumping. The hot water often flashes to steam, which is used to drive a turbine. In otherconfigurations, the hot water is run through a heat exchanger that transfers the heat into a“working fluid” used to drive turbines.After the heat is extracted, a portion of the water produced from the resource is generallycondensed and returned underground by injection wells. The water then is reheated and maymigrate toward a production well to complete the cycle.Conventional hydrothermal systems suffer two important constraints. First, there must be ahigh level of subsurface permeability to allow the flow of water through hot rock. Second,hydrothermal projects rely on large volumes of “process water” to transport heat to theturbine. But much of that water is unavoidably lost to hidden fractures in the surrounding rock,so makeup water is continually required. Heat extraction is a direct function of the amount ofwater flow between injection and production wells for a given temperature.Engineered Geothermal SystemsTo address the permeability problem, the U.S. Department of Energy and the geothermalindustry have experimented with a technology called enhanced geothermal systems (EGS).EGS uses hydraulic fracturing to create small fractures that collectively increase permeabilitywithin a geothermally heated reservoir. Large volumes of water are then circulated throughthe system to create an artificial version of a conventional hydrothermal reservoir.Despite more than three decades of investment, research, and experimentation, EGS has yetto attain commercial viability. Hydraulic fracturing is not only complex, risky, and expensive,but the resulting system still requires enormous water resources. EGS projects requiresubstantial volumes of water not only for the hydraulic fracturing process, but, on acontinuous basis, for heat transport through the system and to make up for significant fluidloss into the surrounding rock formations.Why Has Geothermal Development in California DramaticallySlowed Down?For a variety of interrelated reasons, geothermal development in California is declining. First,the best and most obvious sites for conventional hydrothermal projects – those

The California Energy Commission's Geothermal Grant and Loan Program is funded by the Geothermal Resources Development Account providing funding to local jurisdictions and private entities for a variety of geothermal projects. This report on the Closed-Loop Geothermal Demonstration Project is the final report for the

Related Documents:

Daulat Ram CLOSED CLOSED 94.75-96.75* (CLOSED) CLOSED CLOSED (69-70.75)* CLOSED CLOSED CLOSED (56) *(72.5)* (40.5) (68) *Waiting List Contact College Deen Dayal Upadhayaya CLOSED CLOSED (70) CLOSED Less 2% for Girls Delhi Coll. of Arts & Com. CLOSED (60 -72) CLOSED (78.5 81) CLOSED (83.75-86.5) (79.5-81) CLOSED (53) CATE CLOSED (62-74) CLOSED .

UNU Geothermal Training Programme Geothermal future in the Caribbean Geothermal energy can play an important role in the Caribbean SIDS area Geothermal as a renewable energy resource is the energy of the future The geothermal prospects are there to be utilized Training of geothermal

K. Webb ESE 499 15 Open-Loop Frequency Response & Stability Open-loop Bode plot can be used to assess stability But, we need to know if system is closed-loop stable for low gain or high gain Here, we'll assume open-loop-stable systems Closed-loop stable for low gain Open-loop Bode plot can tell us: Is a system closed-loop stable? If so, how stable?

154 MW installed geothermal generation supplies 12.06 % of country’s electric energy consumption! Geothermal projects in operation: Momotombo Geothermal Field San Jacinto-Tizate Geothermal Field Momotombo Geothermal Field: PHASE I: 35 MW FT Condensing Unit- 1983 PH

of information on geothermal energy, a PowerPoint slideshow that can be used to discuss geothermal energy sources and uses. 102. Geothermal Energy in Latin America Sources of Geothermal Energy. GEOTHERMAL

deep unconventional geothermal resources, the phases of development of a 400 MWe generation capacity Geothermal Scheme in NE Iceland, geothermal development in reducing CO2 emissions, and perspectives on the future of geothermal energy in the United States. Technology of harnessing geothermal power now and future will also be discussed.

scaling issues with production of geothermal fluids to surface (Fig. 2). A keylimitation though is that heatin a closed-loop system can only be transported from the reservoir to the wellbore by heat conduction [7], while within the wellbore, convection dominates. * Corresponding author. Geothermal energy resources are widely distributed in Canada,

Introduction to Takaful Prepared by: Dr. Khalid Al Amri 6 Conventional Insurance (non-mutual) Takaful Insurance Five Key Elements Speculation Uncertainty Prohibited activities Mutual Guarantee: The basic objective of Takaful is to pay a defined loss from a defined fund. Liability and all losses are divided between policyholders. The policyholders are both the insurer and the insured Ownership .