U.S. Department Of Homeland Security - ICE

1y ago
11 Views
3 Downloads
570.45 KB
9 Pages
Last View : 16d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Lee Brooke
Transcription

U.S. Department of Homeland SecurityU.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementOffice of Professional ResponsibilityInspections and Detention Oversight DivisionWashington, DC 20536-5501Office of Detention OversightCompliance InspectionEnforcement and Removal OperationsERO San Antonio Field OfficeEl Valle Detention FacilityRaymondville, TexasJanuary 4-8, 2021

COMPLIANCE INSPECTIONof theEL VALLE DETENTION FACILITYRaymondville, TexasTABLE OF CONTENTSFACILITY OVERVIEW . 4COMPLIANCE INSPECTION PROCESS . 5FINDINGS BY PERFORMANCE-BASED NATIONAL DETENTION STANDARDS2011 (REVISED 2016) MAJOR CATEGORIES . 6DETAINEE RELATIONS . 7COMPLIANCE INSPECTION FINDINGS . 8SAFETY . 8Environmental Health and Safety . 8CARE . 8Food Service . 8Medical Care . 8ACTIVITIES . 8Telephone Access . 8CONCLUSION . 9

COMPLIANCE INSPECTION PROCESSODO conducts oversight inspections of ICE detention facilities with an average daily populationgreater than ten, and where detainees are housed for longer than 72 hours, to assess compliancewith ICE national detention standards. These inspections focus solely on facility compliance withdetention standards that directly affect detainee life, health, safety, and/or well-being.4ODO identifies violations of ICE detention standards, ICE policies, or operational procedures as“deficiencies.” ODO also highlights instances in which the facility resolves deficiencies prior tocompletion of the ODO inspection. Where applicable, these corrective actions are annotated with“C” under the Compliance Inspection Findings section of this report.Upon completion of each inspection, ODO conducts a closeout briefing with facility and localERO officials to discuss preliminary findings. A summary of these findings is shared with EROmanagement officials. Thereafter, ODO provides ICE leadership with a final complianceinspection report to: (i) assist ERO in developing and initiating corrective action plans; and (ii)provide senior executives with an independent assessment of facility operations. ODO’s findingsinform ICE executive management in their decision-making to better allocate resources across theagency’s entire detention inventory.ODO was unable to conduct an on-site inspection of this facility, as a result of the COVID-19pandemic, and instead, conducted a remote inspection of the facility. During this remoteinspection, ODO interviewed facility staff, ERO field office staff, and detainees, reviewed filesand detention records, and was able to assess compliance for at least 90 percent or more of the ICEnational detention standards reviewed during the inspection.4ODO reviews the facility’s compliance with selected standards in their entirety.Office of Detention OversightJanuary 2021El Valle Detention Facility5ERO San Antonio

DETAINEE RELATIONSODO interviewed 12 detainees, who each voluntarily agreed to participate. None of the detaineesmade allegations of discrimination, mistreatment, or abuse. ODO attempted to conduct detaineeinterviews via video teleconference; however, the ERO field office and facility were not able toaccommodate this request because the facility was using their video-teleconference system forimmigration court. As such, the detainee interviews were conducted via telephone.Religious Practices: One detainee stated the facility’s management reprimanded him when he andseveral other detainees formed a prayer group and practiced their religion together.Action Taken: ODO spoke with the facility’s chaplain and their director of security, and both staffmembers stated the facility would only request detainees to temporarily suspend a detainee prayergroup when the facility conducted population counts. ODO reviewed the facility’s grievance logand found no grievances, which alleged the facility prevented detainees from practicing theirreligion. Additionally, ODO reviewed the detainee’s detention file and found nothing to indicatethe facility reprimanded the detainee for practicing his religion.Office of Detention OversightJanuary 2021El Valle Detention Facility7ERO San Antonio

COMPLIANCE INSPECTION FINDINGSSAFETYENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY (EH&S)ODO interviewed the facility’s risk manager, reviewed 17 fire, safety, and sanitation reports, andnoted an Area of Concern. Specifically, 5 out of 17 weekly reports for the facility’s laundry hadvarying data fields left blank on the forms. Prior to the conclusion of the inspection, the facility’srisk manager provided additional training to the facility’s safety department staff members, whichspecifically addressed completing all fields on the facility’s fire, safety, and sanitation report form.CAREFOOD SERVICE (FS)ODO reviewed the FS department’s temperature logs for November 2020, interviewed the actingfood service administrator (FSA), and found FS staff did not log refrigeration/freezer equipmenttemperatures for 3 out of 30-days (Deficiency FS-4136).ODO found the FSA did not sign the FS department’s temperature logs for 2 out of 30-days inNovember 2020 (Deficiency FS-4147).MEDICAL CARE (MC)ODO reviewed the facility’s MC policy and found the policy’s areas pertaining to pharmacymanagement, sick call procedures, emergency medical services, and first aid were not specific tooperations at EVDF, which ODO noted as an Area of Concern.ACTIVITIESTELEPHONE ACCESS (TA)ODO inspected the housing unit postings and found the facility did not have the most currentconsular list posted in the detainee housing units (Deficiency TA-268). Prior to the completion of6“ Staff shall check refrigerator and water temperatures daily and record the results. The FSA or designee shall.”See ICE PBNDS 2011, Standard, Food Service, Section (V)(J)(13).7“ The FSA or designee shall verify and document requirements of food and equipment temperatures. See ICEPBNDS 2011, Standard, Food Service, Section (V)(J)(13).8“ Updated telephone and consulate lists shall be posted in detainee housing units.” See ICE PBDNS 2011,Standard, Telephone Access, Section (V)(C).9“Even if telephone service is generally limited to collect calls, each facility shall permit detainees to make direct orfree calls to the offices and individuals listed below. The Field Office Director shall ensure that all information is keptcurrent and is provided to each facility. Updated lists need to be posted in the detainee housing units. A facility mayplace reasonable restrictions on the hours, frequency and duration of such direct and/or free calls, but may not limit adetainee’s attempt to obtain legal representation. Full telephone access shall be granted in order for a detainee tocontact the following: DHS/OIG.” See ICE PBNDS 2011, Standard, Telephone Access, Section (V)(E).Office of Detention OversightJanuary 2021El Valle Detention Facility8ERO San Antonio

Washington, DC 20536-5501 Office of Detention Oversight . "C" under the Compliance Inspection Findings section of this report. Upon completion of each inspection, ODO conducts a closeout briefing with facility and local . ODO reviewed the facility's MC policy and found the policy's areas pertaining to pharmacy management, sick call .

Related Documents:

HOMELAND SECURITY PRESIDENTIAL DIRECTIVE-1 October 29, 2001 Subject: Organization and Operation of the Homeland Security Council This is the first in a series of Homeland Security Presidential Directives that shall record and communicate presidential decisions about the homeland security policies of the United States. A. Homeland Security CouncilFile Size: 236KB

U.S. Department of Homeland Security was created to promote homeland security and to coordinate homeland security efforts among other government agencies and private industry. With multiple locations in and around Washington, D.C., and throughout the country, the Department of Homeland Security employed about 183,000 workers in

Executive Summary x JP 3-28 appropriate authorities. DSCA is conducted only in the US homeland. Homeland Security, Homeland Defense, and Defense Support of Civil Authorities Homeland security (HS), homeland defense (HD), a

Oct 13, 2010 · MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND THE DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE REGARDING CYBERSECURITY 1. PARTIES. The parties to this Agreement are the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Department of Defense (DoD). 2. AUTHORITY. This Agreement is authorized under the provisions of the Homeland

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY / HOMELAND SECURITY - GRANT - PROGRAM Appendix E - Acronvms 1 A AAR ACH AEL AFG AHRQ ANSI ASAP B BSlR BZPP C CAPR CCR CBP CBRNE CCP CCTV CDC CERT CFA CFR CFDA CIIKR CIP CM lA COG COOP CO-OP CRI CSlD After Action Reports Automated Clearing House Authorized Equipment List Assistance to Firefighters Grants

Vetting Center (NVC), expanded biographic . 4 Homeland Threat Assessment U.S. Department of Homeland Security “ With honor and integrity, we will safeguard the American people, our Homeland, and our

Blueprint for a Secure Cyber Future Page iii November 2011 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Blueprint for a Secure Cyber Future builds on the Department of Homeland Security Quadrennial Homeland Security Review Report's strategic framework by providing a clear path to create a safe, secure, and resilient cyber environment for the homeland security .

The DHS Quadrennial Homeland Security Review in 2014, for example, stated that "Preventing terrorist attacks on the Nation is and should remain the cornerstone of homeland security,"4 and, more recently, DHS published a strategic plan that listed as its first goal to "counter terrorism and homeland security threats."5