Appendix I: Supplemental Information: Pipeline Safety
IAppendix I:Supplemental Information:Pipeline Safety
APPENDIX I. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION:PIPELINE SAFETYAPPENDIX I-1: PIPELINE INCIDENTSThe two pipeline incidents that led to the passage of the Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 andthe current pipeline integrity management rules are as follows: Bellingham, Washington, June 10, 1999. According to the National TransportationSafety Board (NTSB) accident report, “About 3:28 p.m., Pacific daylight time, on June 10,1999, a 16-inch diameter steel pipeline owned by Olympic Pipe Line Company (Olympic)ruptured and released about 237,000 gallons of gasoline into a creek that flowed throughWhatcom Falls Park in Bellingham, Washington. About one and one half hours after therupture, the gasoline ignited and burned approximately one and one half miles along thecreek. Two 10-year-old boys and an 18-year-old man died as a result of the accident.Eight additional injuries were documented. A single-family residence and the City ofBellingham’s water treatment plant were severely damaged. As of January 2002, Olympicestimated that total property damages were at least 45 million.The major safety issues identified during this investigation were excavations performed byIMCO General Construction, Inc., in the vicinity of Olympic’s pipeline during a majorconstruction project and the adequacy of Olympic Pipe Line Company’s inspectionsthereof; the adequacy of Olympic Pipe Line Company’s interpretation of the results of inline inspections of its pipeline and its evaluation of all pipeline data available to it toeffectively manage system integrity; the adequacy of Olympic Pipe Line Company’smanagement of the construction and commissioning of the Bayview products terminal; theperformance and security of Olympic Pipe Line Company’s supervisory control and dataacquisition system; and the adequacy of Federal regulations regarding the testing of reliefvalves used in the protection of pipeline systems.” (NTSB, 2002). Carlsbad, New Mexico, August 19, 2000. Per the National Transportation SafetyBoard accident report, “At 5:26 a.m., mountain daylight time, on Saturday, August 19,2000, a 30-inch diameter natural gas transmission pipeline operated by El Paso NaturalGas Company ruptured adjacent to the Pecos River near Carlsbad, New Mexico. Thereleased gas ignited and burned for 55 minutes. Twelve persons who were camping undera concrete-decked steel bridge that supported the pipeline across the river were killed andtheir three vehicles destroyed. Two nearby steel suspension bridges for gas pipelinescrossing the river were extensively damaged. According to El Paso Natural Gas Company,property and other damages or losses totaled 998,296.The major safety issues identified in this investigation were the design and construction ofthe pipeline, the adequacy of El Paso Natural Gas Company’s internal corrosion controlprogram, the adequacy of Federal safety regulations for natural gas pipelines, and theadequacy of Federal oversight of the pipeline operator.” (NTSB, 2003).FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐1MARCH 2018
ReferencesNTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2002. Pipeline Rupture and Subsequent Fire inBellingham, Washington, June 10, 1999. Pipeline Accident Report NTSB/PAR-02/02.Washington, D.C.NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 2003. Pipeline Rupture and Subsequent Fire nearCarlsbad, New Mexico, August 19, 2000. Pipeline Accident Report NTSB/PAR-03/01.Washington, D.C.FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐2MARCH 2018
APPENDIX I-2: BP PIPELINES CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS(2016 VERSION)FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐3MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐4MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐5MARCH 2018
APPENDIX I-3: OLYMPIC DATA REQUEST AND RESPONSES (FORENERGIZE EASTSIDE EIS PIPELINE RISK ASSESSMENT)FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐6MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐7MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐8MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐9MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐10MARCH 2018
APPENDIX I-4: PSE ENERGIZE EASTSIDE CORRIDOR SAFETYFAQ SHEETFINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐11MARCH 2018
FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐12MARCH 2018
APPENDIX I-5: ENERGIZE EASTSIDE EIS PIPELINE SAFETYTECHNICAL REPORT (PREPARED BY EDM SERVICES)[note – no revisions have been made to the version as presented in the Phase 2 Draft EIS; therefore,the full study is not reprinted here. See Appendix I-5 of the Phase 2 Draft EIS for the full study]FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐13MARCH 2018
APPENDIX I-6: PIPELINE SAFETY REGULATIONSRegulationSummaryFederalPipeline Safety Act of 1968(49 United States Code [USC] Section60101)Granted authorization to the U.S. Department ofTransportation to develop minimum safety standards fornatural gas pipelines.Hazardous Liquid Pipeline Safety Actof 1979(Public Law 96-129)Granted authorization to the U.S. Department ofTransportation to develop minimum safety standards for oiland hazardous liquid pipelines.49 CFR, Parts 190 through 199U.S. Code sections that cover pipeline safety.49 CFR Part 195Transportation of Hazardous Liquids by Pipeline (theprimary U.S. Code section addressing hazardous liquidpipeline safety).Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty,and Jobs Creation Act of 2011(Public Law 112-90)Increased the number of pipeline inspectors and mandateda variety of new safety measures. Required studies ofpipeline safety.Protecting Our Infrastructure ofPipelines and Enhancing Safety Act of2016Reauthorized the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, andJobs Creation Act of 2011; reaffirmed mandates of the2011 act; and established new mandates.Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of2002(CFR 192 Subpart O, Pipeline IntegrityManagement)Strengthened federal pipeline safety programs, stateoversight of pipeline operators, and public educationregarding gas pipeline safety. Required gas pipelineoperators to conduct a risk assessment and implementintegrity management programs for pipelines in highconsequence areas.Oil Pollution Act of 1990(49 CFR Part 194)Expanded EPA’s oversight of oil storage facilities andvessels. Required some oil storage facilities to prepareFacility Response Plans.2006 Pipeline Inspection, Protection,Enforcement and Safety Act(Public Law 109-468)Created state grant system to improve damage preventionprograms, and established the national “Call Before YouDig” program. Required a review of the adequacy of federalpipeline safety regulations related to internal corrosioncontrol.FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐14MARCH 2018
RegulationSummaryStateWAC, Title 480, Chapter 480-75,Hazardous Liquid PipelinesAdopted the federal hazardous liquids pipeline regulations.Underground Utilities – DamagePrevention Law(RCW 19.122)Established a comprehensive damage prevention program.Required pipeline companies, underground facility owners,and excavators to participate in protecting the public healthand safety when excavating.WAC 173-182 – Oil Spill ContingencyPlanEstablished covered vessel and facility oil spill contingencyplan requirements, drill and equipment verificationrequirements, primary response contractor standards, andrecordkeeping and compliance information.LocalRedmond Zoning Code (RZC)21.26.040 Setback RequirementsEstablished minimum setback requirements from thehazardous pipeline corridors. Purpose is to minimize risk topublic health, safety, and welfare due to hazardous liquidpipelines. No construction or expansion of structures isallowed in the pipeline corridor. No setback is required forutilities for areas along the hazardous liquid corridor, butthe Director of Planning and Community Development (ortheir designee) may require a setback based on sitespecific conditions.Renton Municipal Code (RMC) 4-3-070(Pipeline Notice)Requires notice on title for development within 500 feet ofliquid or gas pipelines.FINAL EISAPPENDIX I SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION: PIPELINE SAFETYPAGE I‐15MARCH 2018
Reauthorized the Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Jobs Creation Act of 2011; reaffirmed mandates of the 2011 act; and established new mandates. Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 (CFR 192 Subpart O, Pipeline Integrity Management) Strengthened federal pipeline safety programs, state oversight of pipeline operators, and public .
Texts of Wow Rosh Hashana II 5780 - Congregation Shearith Israel, Atlanta Georgia Wow ׳ג ׳א:׳א תישארב (א) ׃ץרֶָֽאָּהָּ תאֵֵ֥וְּ םִימִַׁ֖שַָּה תאֵֵ֥ םיקִִ֑לֹאֱ ארָָּ֣ Îָּ תישִִׁ֖ארֵ Îְּ(ב) חַורְָּ֣ו ם
Pipeline device hardware, Pipeline network, the Pipeline host hardware, the Pipeline application software and the Pipeline media disk storage systems. Each of these components is described below. Pipeline device hardware Pipeline device hardware has up to four independent channels with SDI I/O for capture and play out. The SDI
Issue of orders 69 : Publication of misleading information 69 : Attending Committees, etc. 69 : Responsibility 69-71 : APPENDICES : Appendix I : 72-74 Appendix II : 75 Appendix III : 76 Appendix IV-A : 77-78 Appendix IV-B : 79 Appendix VI : 79-80 Appendix VII : 80 Appendix VIII-A : 80-81 Appendix VIII-B : 81-82 Appendix IX : 82-83 Appendix X .
Page 2 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 12‐3‐13 Pipeline ‐ The pipeline and its related appurtenances. Pipeline Company ‐ The entity responsible for installing the pipeline, its successors, and assigns, on its own behalf and as operator of the company. Right‐of‐Way ‐ Includes the permanent and temporary easements that the pipeline company acquires
and Hazardous Liquid pipeline risk models. Operators establish risk models to address risk and improve safety within their respective pipeline systems. Pipeline risk models are a foundational part of the assessment of operational pipeline risk. Federal pipeline safety integrity management (IM) regulations require pipeline operators to use risk
Page 2 of 22 ODNR‐DSWR Pipeline Standard 12‐3‐13 Pipeline ‐ The pipeline and its related appurtenances. Pipeline Company ‐ The entity responsible for installing the pipeline, its successors, and assigns, on its own behalf and as operator of the company. Right‐of‐Way ‐ Includes the permanent and temporary easements that the pipeline company acquires
Appendix G Children's Response Log 45 Appendix H Teacher's Journal 46 Appendix I Thought Tree 47 Appendix J Venn Diagram 48 Appendix K Mind Map 49. Appendix L WEB. 50. Appendix M Time Line. 51. Appendix N KWL. 52. Appendix 0 Life Cycle. 53. Appendix P Parent Social Studies Survey (Form B) 54
An Introduction to Modal Logic 2009 Formosan Summer School on Logic, Language, and Computation 29 June-10 July, 2009 ; 9 9 B . : The Agenda Introduction Basic Modal Logic Normal Systems of Modal Logic Meta-theorems of Normal Systems Variants of Modal Logic Conclusion ; 9 9 B . ; Introduction Let me tell you the story ; 9 9 B . Introduction Historical overview .
