CONTENTS TABLES - Eisdocs.dsdip.qld.gov.au
E6Impact Summary & Management FrameworkRISK MANAGEMENT PLANCONTENTSTABLES6.1Introduction.6096.2a:Risk assessment matrix.6106.1.16.2b:Risk identification.6116.2Hazard and risk.609Risk assessment.6096.2.1Approach.6096.2.2Risk register.6096.2.3Change in risk profile.6106.2.4Health and safety.6106.2.5 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan andAerodrome Operations Manual.6106.2.6Emergency Management Plan.6106.2.7 Counter-terrorism and criticalinfrastructure protection.6106.2.8 Aeordrome Rescue andFire Fighting Service.610E6-608SUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECT
6.1Introduction6.1.1Hazard and riskThis section provides a high level assessment of the hazardsand risks to people and airport operations that may beassociated with the Sunshine Coast Airport (SCA) ExpansionProject (the Project).This risk assessment would provide the basis for future riskmanagement as the Project progresses.The focus of future risk management will transition throughdesign, construction and into operations. The form of therisk processes will be dependent on the procurementapproach adopted but will be necessary to address safetyin design risks, construction risks and operational risks,which will be addressed through the processes discussed inSections 6.2 to 6.8.The risk was determined based on the consequence andlikelihood, as shown in Table 6.2a.Mitigation measures were determined for each risk, and therisk was re-assessed to determine the residual risk rating.All risks retained a residual medium or lower risk rating.6.2.2 Risk registerThe risks identified for each project phase are provided inTable 6.2b. Risks have been identified as safety risks (S) orairport operations risks (AO) in the risk type column.6.2.3 Change in risk profileThe development of the new runway would reduce theoperational risk for the airport, owing to the following:6.2Risk assessment6.2.1The risk assessment considered only risks that areconsidered to be Project-specific. General site safetyrisks, for example, construction worker exposure to loudnoise or sun, were not considered. It is expected thesewould be addressed in the contractor’s health and safetymanagement plan.yy The new runway is fully compliant with MOS 139 forCode 4E aircraft, including compliance for:Approach Runway length and widthA risk assessment was completed for all aspects of theproject delivery and operations based on the principlesset out in Australia/New Zealand AS/NZS ISO 31000:2009Risk management—Principles and Guidelines. Runway graded strip and flyover area Recommended 240 m runway and safety area. There are considerably fewer residences in thePublic Safety Area of the new runway compared withRWY 18/36All phases of the Project were considered, including:a) Preconstruction The alignment of the new runway significantlyreduces the occurrence of cross-winds comparedwith RWY 18/36.b) Civil worksc) Dredgingd) Runway and taxiway pavementse) Operations.The risk assessment considers the combined likelihood andconsequence of a potential event on personal safety andairport operations. An example of a major impact on airportoperations would be a breach of airside security.The likelihood of an aircraft crash on RWY 13/31 isconsidered to be highly unlikely. As with any aircraft incident,the potential consequences of a crash would includemultiple fatalities. Nevertheless, given the very low likelihoodof an incident ( 1:10,000 chance of a fatality outside thePublic Safety Area) the overall risk level is low.Table 6.2a: Risk assessment matrixConsequenceLikelihoodSafetyNo InjuryInjuryFatalityAirport OperationsMinorModerateMajorAlmost ImpossibleNegligible (N)Negligible (N)Low (L)UnlikelyNegligible (N)Low (L)Medium (M)PossibleLow (L)Medium (M)High (H)LikelyMedium (M)High (H)Extreme (E)environmental impact statementE6-609
E6Impact Summary & Management FrameworkRISK MANAGEMENT PLAN6.2.4 Health and safetySCA operates under a Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA)approved Safety Management System.6.2.5 Wildlife Hazard Management Plan andAerodrome Operations ManualSCA operates in accordance with a Wildlife HazardManagement Plan and Aerodrome Operations Manual.These documents provide the framework to manage andmitigate operational risks at the airport.Both of these documents will be redrafted prior to thecommissioning of Runway (RWY) 13/31 as part of the formalprocess for implementing the changes to airspace andaircraft management. The formal airspace change processis required to obtain certification to operate the new runwayand will provide opportunity for Commonwealth and Stateagencies to contribute to the agreed plans.6.2.6Emergency Management PlanSCA maintains an internal Airport Emergency Plan.The aim of the Airport Emergency Plan is to provide atimely and coordinated response to, and recovery from, anemergency at the airport. It covers all manner of potentialaviation related emergencies.The plan details the arrangements for control and coordination of the response to, and initial recovery from, anemergency within the airport boundary or in the vicinity ofSunshine Coast.The Airport Emergency Plan was developed to reflect therequirements of:yy Civil Aviation Safety Regulation Part 139 and ICAO Annex14 to the Convention on International Civil Aviationyy Disaster Management Act 2003yy Sunshine Coast Council Emergency Operation Planyy Queensland Ambulance Service (QAS) Act 1991yy QAS Multi Casualty Management Plan.This document is supported by a number of StandardOperating Procedures (SOPs).SCA would revise the existing Airport Emergency Planto include operations on the new runway before itis commissioned.SCA also maintains the following:yy A cyclone plan to address severe weather at SCA andweather events farther afield that might impact on opsat SCAyy A Pandemic Influenza Management PlanE6-610SUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECTAll of these documents have been produced in concertwith the relevant local, state and commonwealthagencies, including Airservices, Queensland PoliceService, Queensland Fire and Emergency Service (QFES),Queensland Ambulance Service, State Emergency Serviceand the Local Disaster Management Group (LDMG). TheLDMG is responsible for preparing and implementingCouncil’s Local Disaster Management Plan.6.2.7 Counter-terrorism and criticalinfrastructure protectionThe Aviation Transport Security Act 2004 (Cth) (ATSA)establishes a regulatory framework to safeguard against actsof unlawful interference with aviation, in respect of Australianregistered aircraft in Australian airspace and airports.SCA, as the airport operator, is responsible for security at theairport and is obliged to have a Transport Security Program(TSP) under the ATSA. The SCA Transport Security Programis confidential and only available to the airport and theCommonwealth Government.6.2.8 Aviation Rescue and Fire Fighting ServiceThe Airport has a fully equipped Aviation Rescue and FireFighting Service (ARFFS) facility to address all aviationrelated fire and rescue events. ARFFS are regulated underthe Civil Aviation Safety Regulations 1998 (CASR 1998) Part139H, which specifies the requirements for the provision ofaviation rescue and fire fighting services.Airservices Australia (Airservices) currently provide Category6 ARFFS for SCA. Airservices is responsible for the provisionof personnel, training and facilities to support ARFFS.The Project includes development of a site south ofRWY 13/31 for establishment of a joint Air Traffic Controltower and new ARFFS station, which would be built byAirservices. Airservices would continue to provide ARFFSafter commissioning the new runway in accordance withCASR 1998 Part 139H.With respect to fires located on adjoining lands, ARFFS may,at the request of QFES, assist in off-site events providedthat such assistance does not compromise their capacity tomanage aviation incidents.
AspectRisk TypeLikelihoodLikelyAORemoval of vegetation may increasewildlife activity through dispersal ofdisturbed wildlife and potentially attractraptors, which could lead to bird strikes.Site clearingPossibleAORoad works in airside areas mayimpinge on the OLS or introduceforeign object damage (FOD) toRWY 18/36.AOWork on the airside fence realignmentclose to RWY 18/36 may extend up to 5m into the OLS.Upgrade/construction ofsite roadsPossibleAOBreaches in the airside fence may leadto a breach of security.PossiblePossibleAirside MajorMajorFatalityHHMHHHRiskAircraft may land on the closed runway.PossibleStage clearing to minimise faunamovement into open areas (i.e.clear towards the remainingvegetation). Implement birdsurveillance and dispersaltechniques to discourage birdsnear the existing runway.Limit the height of equipmentused for airside road work and/or schedule works to avoidaircraft movement. Implementdust control and cleanup procedures.Issue Notice to Airmen (NOTAM)and/or schedule works to avoidaircraft movements.Prescribe constructionsequencing and securityrequirements during perimeterfence modificationsImplement closure inaccordance with CASArequirements.Implement traffic controlsand management plan duringconstruction.MitigationClosure elihoodWorks at an active intersection couldlead to a traffic accidentConsequenceUpgrade to FinlandRoad – installationof traffic lights atDavid Low WayintersectionCivil WorksPreconstructionImpactNo project specific risks identifiedTable 6.2b: Risk identificationLMLMMMResidual Riskenvironmental impact statementE6-611
E6-612LikelyPossibleAOAOSSThe use of large earthmovingmachinery approx. 50 m from theVHF-omnidirectional radar (VOR) wouldaffect its performance.The presence of site runoff within thebund could attract birds, which couldlead to bird strikes. The polishing pondwould be located approx. 2 km fromRYW 18/36.Public safety at the construction siteon Marcoola beach during pipelineassembly.Public safety when the pipeline is beingdragged from the beach to the mooringpoint.Constructionof perimeterreclamation bundand polishingpond wallDredge pipelineinstallationSUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION nThe public would be asked tostay clear of the operational areaduring the works. Note: TheRegional Harbour Master mayrequire a temporary exclusionzone between the beach and theoff-shore pump out location.The beach would be temporarilyclosed during assembly ofthe sand pipeline. Provisionfor alternative public andemergency vehicle access wouldbe provided around the activeconstruction site.Implement bird surveillanceand dispersal techniques todiscourage birds.The VOR would need to berelocated before constructionactivities occur near the southeast end of the constructionarea.Implement bird surveillanceand dispersal techniques todiscourage birds.Implement a dust managementplan, with stringent requirementswithin 300 m of RWY sequenceModerateMLLLLLResidual RiskPossibleLikelyAOLikelyThe presence of standing water in thepartially constructed drain could attractbirds, which could lead to bird strikes.AOConstructionof northernperimeter drainAspectEarthworks for site infrastructure (suchas internal haul roads) could generatedust, which could present a hazard toaircraft movements.ImpactEarthworksRisk TypeNo project specific risks identifiedLikelihoodPreconstructionE6Impact Summary & Management FrameworkRISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
LikelyAOAOEarthworks for site infrastructure (suchas internal haul roads) could generatedust, which could present a hazard toaircraft movements.Pipeline installation equipment tallerthan 4.5 m could impinge on the OLSof RWY 18/36.ConsequenceMajorEHHIf equipment greater than 4.5 min height is used to install thesand pipeline, these works wouldbe scheduled in consultationwith Air Traffic Control (ATC) tooccur during non-flying hours.The contractor would be inconstant communication withATC so that works could behalted and the area cleared if anunplanned flight were to occur.Implement a dust managementplan, with stringent requirementswithin 300 m of RWY 18/36.Pedestrian access would beprovided over the sand pipelineabove the high-tide markonce it is installed. The accesswould be designed to ensuresafe and universal access. Avehicle crossing point would beprovided for emergency vehicles.The public would be asked tostay clear of the operational areaduring the works. Note: TheRegional Harbour Master mayrequire a temporary exclusionzone between the beach and theoff-shore pump out hoodInjuryFatalityConsequenceLikelyLikelySA member of the public could fall whiletrying try to cross the sand pipeline.PossibleSAspectPublic safety when the pipeline is beingdragged from the beach to the pumpout site.ImpactDredge pipelineinstallationRisk TypeNo project specific risks identifiedLikelihoodPreconstructionMLLMResidual Riskenvironmental impact statementE6-613
E6-614SUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECTSAOSA pipe burst could occur in anairside area.Potential interaction between thedredger and/or tug, and recreational orfishing yHHLHThe pump-out area wouldbe marked-out with buoysand advisory signs would beinstalled. Note: the RegionalHarbour Master may require atemporary exclusion zone forthe duration of the pumpingactivities.The condition of the sandpipeline would be monitoredand immediate action would betaken in the event of a significantleak.The condition of the sandpipeline would be monitoredand immediate action would betaken in the event of a significantleak.An access ramp over thepipeline would be provided toensure access to all areas of theairport. The pipeline installationwould be staged to ensurethat access over the pipeline isavailable at all times.An access ramp over thepipeline would be provided toensure access to all areas of theairport. The pipeline installationwould be staged to ensurethat access over the pipeline isavailable at all times.MitigationMajorRiskHModerateModerateNo ceA pipe burst could occur on Marcoolabeach.AOThe pipeline could inhibit accessby ARFFS vehicles to the site of anincident at the airport.LikelihoodPossibleLNNLLResidual RiskSand pumpingAOThe pipeline could inhibit access byAviation Rescue and Firefighting Service(ARFFS) vehicles to the site of anincident at the airport.AspectDredge pipelineinstallationImpactNo project specific risks identifiedRisk TypePreconstructionE6Impact Summary & Management FrameworkRISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
PossibleLikelySAODelivery of pavement materials to sitewould increase the movement of largevehicles between the source quarry andthe site, which could introduce traffichazards.Stockpiling and preparing pavementmaterials could generate dust,which could present a hazard to orks during sand trimming couldgenerate dust, which could present ahazard to aircraft movements.Sand alityModerateFatalityHHHMMLocate the pavement stockpilingand batching area away fromRWY 18/36. Implement a dustmanagement plan, with stringentrequirements within 300 m ofRWY 18/36.Implement a traffic managementplan, which would considerhaul routes and approved traveltimes.Implement a dust managementplan, with stringent requirementswithin 300 m of RWY 18/36.The pond wall would bedesigned with a wide enoughcrest to allow safe accessaround the pond.Design the pond wall with anappropriate factor of safety.Regular inspection of bundwall integrity.Implement bird surveillanceand dispersal techniques todiscourage mpossibleUnlikelyModerateUnlikelyLikelihoodThe presence of approx. 1.5 m deepof water in the polishing pond couldpresent a safety hazard. The polishingpond would be secured to preventpublic access to the area.UnlikelySThe polishing pond wall could fail,releasing tailwater. Potential damagefrom a failure would be limited to onsite construction-phase infrastructure(such as the perimeter ementPossibleAOAspectTailwater in the polishing pond andwater being pumped to site couldattract birds, which could lead tobird strikes.ImpactTailwatermanagementRisk TypeNo project specific risks identifiedLikelihoodPreconstructionLMLMLLResidual Riskenvironmental impact statementE6-615
E6-616LikelyLikelyAOAOConstruction of the apron expansionand changes to the RWY 12/30taxiways introduces conflicts forthe existing GA facilities west ofthe terminal.Apron extensionand taxiwaychanges at thewestern GeneralAviation (GA) areaAspectConstruction activities within the runwaystrip present an obstacle and dust/FODhazard to aircraft.ImpactPavementconstructionwithin RWY 18/36runway stripRisk TypeNo project specific risks odSUNSHINE COAST AIRPORT EXPANSION PROJECTThe project phasing wouldneed to consider providingaccess from the western GAarea to RWY 18/36 throughoutthe works. This may includeconstruction of temporarytaxiways around constructionareas or similar temporaryworks.It is planned to temporarilyoperate RWY 13/31 with adisplaced threshold so thatRWY 18/36 could be temporarilyclosed during the works. At thistime, all flights would be from/to RWY 13/31. Constructionactivities would be managedunder a ‘Method of WorkingPlan’, which will be prepared inconjunction with SCA airportoperations personnel andAirservices Australia.ConsequenceHELLResidual RiskModerateMajorE6Impact Summary & Management FrameworkRISK MANAGEMENT PLAN
Implementationof new operatingproceduresAOAOUnauthorised airside access presents asecurity ndertake commissioning andintroduction of new proceduresin accordance with establishedguidelines and in liaison withCASA and Airservices Australiaincluding update of managementplans to obtain runwaycertification. Issue appropriateNOTAM in lead-up to runwayopening.Maintain and implementairside security measures. Onlyauthorised construction workersto have airside access.Construction activities wouldbe managed under a ‘Methodof Working Plan’, which willbe prepared in conjunctionwith SCA airport operationspersonnel and AirservicesAustralia.Cordon off construction areasand divert the public aroundunsafe areas. Erect appropriatewarning LikelihoodImproper implementation of flightprocedures presents aircraft operationshazards.AOWorks in airside areas could introducedust and FOD hazards for ublic access to an active constructionsite presents safety hazards.AspectTerminal upgradeImpactNo project specific risks identifiedRisk TypePreconstructionMLLLResidual Riskenvironmental impact statementE6-617
the development of the new runway would reduce the operational risk for the airport, owing to the following: y the new runway is fully compliant with moS 139 for code 4e aircraft, including compliance for: Runway length and width Runway graded strip and flyover area Recommended 240 m runway and safety area.
Greenbank is located at the southern edge of Logan and to the west of Beenleigh. The area is commonly referred to as Greater Flagstone. The Greater Flagstone area is identified as a major urban growth area that will provide for the future urban growth needs of the South East Queensland (QLD) Region. An extensive range of planning and
The Check In Qld app can be downloaded from the Google Play Store or the Apple App Store – let customers know they can simply search ‘Check In Qld’. The Check In Qld app is compatible with the following devices – Apple iPhone, iPad and iPad touch operatin
IAAF SCORING TABLES OF ATHLETICS / IAAF TABLES DE COTATION D’ATHLETISME VI AUTHORS’ INTRODUCTION The Scoring Tables of Athletics are based on exact statistical data and according to the following principles: The scores in the tables of different events cover equivalent performances. Therefore, the tables can beFile Size: 2MBPage Count: 368Explore furtherIAAF Scoring Calculatorcaltaf.comIAAF Scoring Tables of Athletics 2017ekjl.eeIAAF Scoring Tables for Combined Eventswww.rfea.esIAAF scoring tables updated for 2017 Newswww.worldathletics.orgstatistics - How to calculate IAAF points? - Sports Stack .sports.stackexchange.comRecommended to you b
2. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT This SBMP forms part of the overarching Wastewater Services Integrated Environmental Management System (IEMS) for Council. The IEMS documents Council's approach for managing potential environmental impacts of Council's products, services and activities across the water business. All site operations and management
70% Marubeni Coal Pty Ltd 123 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 10% CHR Vermont Pty Ltd Level 34, Central Plaza One, 345 Queen Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 10% Coranar (Australia) Pty Ltd 10% Level 37, Riverside Court, 123 Eagle Street, Brisbane QLD 4000 Lake Vermont Resources Pty Ltd manages th
covid19.qld.gov.au. A VISION FOR THE FUTURE Our vision for Queensland’s recovery from this pandemic is threefold – we are working to protect the health of every Queenslander, we are creating jobs, and we are work
6 Sprocket Girls 4 Riders 3 Qualified. RANK. NAME. GROUP TOTAL After 5 of 6 Rounds RESULT POINTS BONUS POINTS . Oscar MURRELL Bayside Bmx Club QLD. 50 0. 50 0. 0. 50--0. 0 - --# Harlen. ANDERSON Bundaberg Bmx Club QLD. 50 0. 50 0 - - 0. . 7 Sprocket Boys 29 Riders 14 Qualified. RANK. NAME. GROUP TOTAL After 5 of 6 Rounds RESULT
Business Accounting Volume 1is the world’s best-selling textbook on bookkeeping and accounting. Now in its tenth edition, it has become the standard introductory text for accounting students and professionals alike. New to this edition: Over 120 brand new review questions for exam practice Coverage of International Accounting Standards 2005 Additional and updated worked examples for areas of .
