This Page Intentionally Left Blank. - United States Army
City of Dallas
This Page Intentionally Left Blank.
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTLead Agency for the EA:United States Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth DistrictCooperating Agency:City of Dallas, TexasTitle of Proposed Action:Proposed Able Pumping Plant Improvements, Dallas, TexasDesignation:Environmental AssessmentAbstractThe United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA)in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (42 United States Code §§ 4321, etseq.), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations found in 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)Parts 1500-1508, and USACE regulations found in 33 CFR Part 230. This EA describes the potentialenvironmental consequences resulting from implementation of proposed improvements to the AblePumping Plant in the City of Dallas, Texas (i.e., the “Proposed Action”). The purpose of the ProposedAction is to provide flood risk management for the 100-year, 24-hour storm event for the Able PumpingPlant service area within the Able Basin. The City of Dallas needs to implement Able Pumping Plantimprovements because people and property in the Able Basin are currently subject to stormwater floodingimpacts that are not efficiently controlled by the existing Able Pumping Plant. By improving the AblePumping Plant, the City of Dallas would be able to provide improved flood risk management to peopleand property in the Able Basin.Section 5141 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114; 121 Stat.1041)provides authorization for improvements to interior drainage for the Dallas Floodway. The proposedimprovements to the Able Pumping Plant would be implemented in compliance with 33 United StatesCode § 408. The City of Dallas is the action proponent.Prepared By:United States Army Corps of EngineersFort Worth DistrictPoint of Contact:United States Army Corps of EngineersFort Worth DistrictAttn: Marcia Hackett819 Taylor Street, Room 3A14Fort Worth, Texas 76102-0300E-mail: Marcia.R.Hackett@usace.army.milTel: (817) 886-1373Fax: (817) 886-6499June 2014A-i
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014This Page Intentionally Left Blank.A-ii
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA)in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code[USC] §§ 4321, et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality regulations found in 40 Code of FederalRegulations (CFR) Parts 1500-1508, and USACE regulations found in 33 CFR Part 230. This EAdescribes the potential environmental consequences resulting from implementation of proposedimprovements to the Able Pumping Plant in Dallas, Texas. The Able Pumping Plant is located adjacent tothe East Levee, between the Houston Street Viaduct and the Jefferson Boulevard Viaduct, in the City ofDallas, Texas.The City of Dallas manages interior drainage by allowing stormwater runoff to pool in sumps (low areas)in interior areas before pumping or gravity feeding it into the Trinity River within the Dallas Floodway.The Able Pumping Plant manages stormwater drainage in the Able Basin, which currently consists ofnine sump ponds, two pump stations (“Small Able” and “Large Able”), and associated infrastructure. Theexisting pump stations have a combined pumping capacity of 220,000 gallons per minute.Over the last 50 years, improvements to the Able Pumping Plant have not kept up with changes in areahydrology or technology. The Able Pumping Plant is not capable of managing predicted 100-year, 24hour storm event water levels, resulting in increased flood potential and associated threats to people andproperty in the Able Basin.The purpose of the Proposed Action is to provide improved flood risk management for the 100-year, 24hour storm event within the Able Basin. The City of Dallas needs to construct a new and more efficientpump station (Able No. 3) at Able Pumping Plant with larger pumping capacity in order to reduce floodrisk to people and property in the Able drainage basin that currently is not efficiently controlled by theexisting Able Pumping Plant. By constructing the Able No. 3 Pump Station, the City of Dallas would beable to provide improved flood risk management to people and property in the Able Basin.Section 5141 of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007 (Public Law 110-114; 121 Stat.1041)provides authorization for improvements to interior drainage for the Dallas Floodway. As part of thisauthorization, proposed improvements to the Able Pumping Plant were initially included as part of theon-going Dallas Floodway Project EIS. However, due to pressing safety concerns associated withflooding impacts, the proposed improvements to the Able Pumping Plant have been extracted from theDallas Floodway Project EIS to expedite the analysis of proposed stormwater flood risk managementactions in the Able Basin.The proposed improvements to the Able Pumping Plant would be implemented in compliance with 33USC § 408. As the lead agency for this NEPA document, the USACE Fort Worth District must determinethe technical soundness and environmental acceptability of this Water Resources Development Act authorized project, as documented in this EA. The City of Dallas, the action proponent for this EA, hasapproved the proposed improvements to the Able Pumping Plant with the passing of the 2006 BondProgram in an election held on November 7, 2006.Implementation of the Proposed Action would reduce predicted 100-year, 24-hour storm event waterlevels to elevations at or below the established City of Dallas design water levels, reducing the potentialflooding impacts to people and property in the Able Basin. In addition, the current Small and Large Ablepump stations would be replaced with a single modernized station (Able No. 3); Small Able and LargeAble pump stations would be demolished once Able No. 3 is partially operational.ES-1
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTPROPOSED ABLE PUMPING PLANT IMPROVEMENTSCITY OF DALLAS, TEXASTABLE OF CONTENTSABSTRACT . A-iEXECUTIVE SUMMARY . ES-1ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS . vCHAPTER 1 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION. 1-11.11.21.31.41.51.61.71.81.91.10INTRODUCTION . 1-1PROJECT AREA . 1-1BACKGROUND . 1-11.3.1Dallas Floodway and Stormwater Drainage Systems . 1-11.3.2Storm Terminology . 1-4ABLE PUMPING PLANT . 1-41.4.1Able Sump Ponds . 1-41.4.2Able Pump Stations . 1-51.4.3Storm Event Water Levels and Associated Potential Flooding Risk . 1-5PURPOSE OF AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION . 1-6PROJECT AUTHORITY . 1-61.6.12006 City of Dallas Bond Program . 1-8USACE ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING PRINCIPLES. 1-8AGENCY COORDINATION AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT. 1-81.8.1Agency Coordination . 1-91.8.2Public Involvement . 1-9IMPACT ANALYSIS CRITERIA . 1-91.9.1Institutional Criteria . 1-91.9.2Public Criteria . 1-101.9.3Technical Criteria . 1-101.9.4Scientific Criteria . 1-11DOCUMENT FRAMEWORK . 1-11CHAPTER 2 PROPOSED ACTION AND ALTERNATIVES . 2-12.12.22.32.4PROPOSED ACTION . 2-1ALTERNATIVE DEVELOPMENT . 2-12.2.1Potential Courses of Action . 2-12.2.2Potential Courses of Action Summary . 2-3ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED. 2-42.3.1Proposed Action . 2-42.3.2No Action Alternative . 2-8PROJECT PLANNING TIMELINE . 2-8i
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES . APPROACH TO ANALYSIS . 3-1LAND USE . 3-13.2.1Existing Conditions . 3-13.2.2Environmental Consequences . 3-2NOISE . 3-23.3.1Existing Conditions . 3-23.3.2Environmental Consequences . 3-4GEOLOGY AND SOILS . 3-53.4.1Existing Conditions . 3-53.4.2Environmental Consequences . 3-5WATER RESOURCES . 3-63.5.1Existing Conditions . 3-63.5.2Environmental Consequences . 3-8BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES . 3-93.6.1Existing Conditions . 3-93.6.2Environmental Consequences . 3-13CULTURAL RESOURCES . 3-153.7.1Existing Conditions . 3-153.7.2Environmental Consequences . 3-16VISUAL RESOURCES . 3-173.8.1Existing Conditions . 3-173.8.2Environmental Consequences . 3-17SOCIOECONOMICS AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE . 3-173.9.1Existing Conditions . 3-173.9.2Environmental Consequences . 3-18AIR QUALITY. 3-193.10.1Existing Conditions . 3-193.10.2Environmental Consequences . 3-19UTILITIES. 3-213.11.1Existing Conditions . 3-213.11.2Environmental Consequences . 3-22HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE . 3-233.12.1Existing Conditions . 3-233.12.2Environmental Consequences . 3-23TRANSPORTATION . 3-243.13.1Existing Conditions . 3-243.13.2Environmental Consequences . 3-25PUBLIC SAFETY . 3-253.14.1Existing Conditions . 3-253.14.2Environmental Consequences . 3-26ii
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014CHAPTER 4 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS . 4-14.1CUMULATIVE IMPACTS . 4-14.1.1Overview . 4-14.1.2Identified Cumulative Projects . 4-14.1.3Cumulative Impact Analysis . 4-4CHAPTER 5 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS . 5-15.1SUMMARY OF IMPACTS . 5-1CHAPTER 6 OTHER CONSIDERATIONS REQUIRED BY NEPA . 6-16.16.26.36.4IRREVERSIBLE OR IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENT OF NATURAL OR FINITE RESOURCES . 6-1RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LOCAL SHORT-TERM USE OF THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT ANDMAINTENANCE AND ENHANCEMENT OF LONG-TERM NATURAL RESOURCE PRODUCTIVITY . 6-1MEANS TO MITIGATE AND/OR MONITOR ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS . 6-1CLIMATE CHANGE . 6-2CHAPTER 7 REFERENCES . 7-1CHAPTER 8 LIST OF PREPARERS . 8-1APPENDICESAPPENDIX AAGENCY NOTIFICATION . A-1APPENDIX BCLEAN WATER ACT § 404(B)(1) ANALYSIS. B-1APPENDIX CRECORD OF NON-APPLICABILITY (RONA) ANDAIR QUALITY DATA . C-1iii
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014List of FiguresFigurePage1-1Regional Vicinity Map . 1-21-2Existing Able Pumping Plant and Sump . 1-31-3Predicted Inundation Areas and Potentially Affected Structures in the Able DrainageArea Resulting from Modeled 100-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event under Existing Conditions . 1-72-1Proposed Able No. 3 Pump Station . 2-53-1Water Resources and Proposed Improvements in the Vicinity of the Proposed Able No. 3Pump Station . 3-73-2Habitat Types and Proposed Improvements in the Vicinity of the Proposed Able No. 3Pump Station . 3-103-3Small and Large Able Pump Stations . 3-153-4Predicted Inundation Areas and Potentially Affected Structures in the Able DrainageArea Resulting from Modeled 100-Year, 24-Hour Storm Event with Able No. 3 Online . 3-274-1Cumulative Projects in the Vicinity of the Proposed Able Pumping Plant Improvements . 4-2List of TablesTablePage1-1Able Sump Pond Connections . 1-52-1Able Sump Pond Connections Planned Improvements . 2-32-2Potential Courses of Action Summary . 2-43-1Habitat Types and Associated Acreages in the Project Area . 3-93-2Federal and State Threatened and Endangered Species Potentially Found in DallasCounty. 3-123-3TPWD Species of Concern Potentially Found in Dallas County. 3-133-4Permanent and Temporary Impacts to Habitat Types in the Region of Influence . 3-143-5Estimated Emissions Resulting from Implementation of the Proposed Action . 3-203-6Pumping Capacity of Existing and Proposed Facilities at Able Pumping Plant . 3-223-7Able Basin Class 4 and 5 Roads Potentially Subject to Flooding. 3-255-1Summary of Environmental Consequences . 5-1iv
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014Acronyms and AbbreviationsACMADTAQCRARasbestos containing materialsaverage daily trafficAir Quality Control RegionArmy RegulationBMPsBest Management PracticesCAACH4CEQCFRCOCO2CVPCWAClean Air ActmethaneCouncil on Environmental QualityCode of Federal Regulationscarbon monoxidecarbon dioxideconcrete volute pumpClean Water PPTCEQTHCTPWDTRCCLUPgreenhouse gasesgallons per minuteHazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive WasteHertzkVkilovoltN2ONAAQSO3OSHAEnvironmental AssessmentEnvironmental Data ResourcesEnvironmental Impact StatementExecutive OrderEngineering RegulationEast and West Levee InteriorDrainage SystemsInterstate HighwayMLKNEPANHPANOxNRHPDallas Area Rapid TransitdecibelA-weighted decibelsDallas County Levee ImprovementDistrictDallas Floodway ExtensionDepartment of State Health ServicesIHLBPNCANCTCOGMartin Luther Kingnitrous oxideNational Ambient Air Quality Standardsvparticulate matter less than 2.5 micronsin diameterparticulate matter less than 10 micronsin diameterreinforced box culvertreinforced concrete sewer pipeRegional General PermitRecord of DecisionRegion of InfluenceRecord of Non-ApplicabilitySupervisory Control and Data AcquisitionState Implementation Planoxides of sulfurStandard Project FloodStormwater Pollution Prevention PlanTRFCDTxDOTU.S.USACEUSCUSDAUSEPAUSTUnited StatesU.S. Army Corps of EngineersU.S. CodeU.S. Department of AgricultureU.S. Environmental Protection Agencyunderground storage tanksVOCs.ozoneOccupational Safety and HealthAdministrationTexas Council on Environmental QualityTexas Historical CommissionTexas Parks and Wildlife DivisionTrinity River Corridor ComprehensiveLand Use PlanTrinity River and Tributaries RegionalEnvironmental Impact StatementTrinity River Flood Control DistrictTexas Department of TransportationTREISlead-based paintNoise Control ActNorth Central Texas Councilof GovernmentsNational Environmental Policy ActNational Historic Preservation Actnitrogen oxidesNational Register of Historic Placesvolatile organic compounds
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014CHAPTER 1PURPOSE AND NEED FOR PROPOSED ACTION1.1INTRODUCTIONThe United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA)in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code[USC] Section 4321, et seq.), the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) regulations found in 40 Codeof Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 1500-1508, and USACE regulations found in 33 CFR Part 230. ThisEA describes the potential environmental consequences resulting from implementation of proposedimprovements to the Able Pumping Plant in the City of Dallas, Texas.1.2PROJECT AREAThe City of Dallas is located adjacent to the Trinity River, just downstream of the confluence of the Westand Elm Forks of the Trinity River. The Able Pumping Plant is part of the East and West Levee InteriorDrainage Systems (EWLIDS), which currently includes six pumping plants, associated sumps, sevenpressure sewers, and numerous gravity sluices that, in total, serve much of the City of Dallas metropolitanarea (Figure 1-1). The EWLIDS are discrete stormwater flood risk management systems separated bygeography. The Able Pumping Plant facilities are located to the south of the Dallas Central BusinessDistrict, with the sump stretching from Reunion Boulevard on the north to the Dallas Area Rapid Transit(DART) Rail Bridge on the south. The Able Pumping Plant includes two pump stations fed from watercollected in nine sump ponds; the pump stations share a single outfall that discharges stormwater to theTrinity River. The two existing pump stations are located on the west side of the sump, adjacent to theEast Levee, between the Houston Street Viaduct and the Jefferson Boulevard Viaduct (Figure 1-2).The approximately 2,685-acre Able Basin defines the project area; however, with the exception of floodextent, no impact associated with the Proposed Action would extend beyond the construction area. Thus,this EA focuses on the approximately 13.4-acre potentially disturbed area associated with proposedimprovements at the Able Pumping Plant.1.3BACKGROUND1.3.1Dallas Floodway and Stormwater Drainage SystemsThe Trinity River was vital to the early development of the City of Dallas. However, numerous largefloods, including the catastrophic flood of 1908, led the City of Dallas to seek protection from TrinityRiver floodwaters. Between 1928 and 1931, the Dallas County Levee Improvement District (DCLID)constructed levees to protect the City of Dallas from riverine flooding. The DCLID relocated theconfluence of the West and Elm Forks, and filled the remnant channel or set it aside for sump storage. In1932, the DCLID had completed construction of the original components of the EWLIDS.In the mid-1940s, major storms, combined with continued urbanization in the watershed, resulted insevere flooding in the project area. To reduce flooding within the City of Dallas area, Congress authorizedthe flood control project termed the “Dallas Floodway” in 1945 and again in 1950. The USACEcompleted building the authorized Dallas Floodway project in 1958, which included substantialimprovements to the levees and the EWLIDS.1-1
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014Legend Pumping PlantsStreetTDRAble Pumping PlantFreewayREC« RES Surface WaterDESHO482Able BasinNTODRDallas NFloodwayLevee SystemDallas Floodway§ 35ELNvingEYM§ 35EPLEAVNNKIMCEESSSTOAKSY LVAEV45ER30SAYSARSTSTGMV VDBLGS ZANS VERNON AVEGulf of MexicoS MARSALIS AVEDAR35ECE§ City of Dallas LouisianaCRE STB LVDCON TYLER STRINNZATHNBLAE I L L I N O I S AV ES POLK STEKI ESTERFigure 1-1 E KIEST BLVDRegional Vicinity MapST1AV§ CARD0.25 0.5 0.75Miles2ELAVN AV EO366ANW KIEST BLVDSKR« E 8TH ST S HAMPTON RDS WESTMORELAN D RDSTSL0S CO C K R E L L HI LL R DW KIEST BLVDNW SANER AVEKilometers0.511.5ATW ILLINOIS AVENS EW IN G AVEMexico0MissouriW J EFOklahomaFE RSONB LVArkansasDTexasW ILLINOIS AVECharlie PumpingDPlantLVEAVKansasNew MexicoIN PlantTH75NHDSColoradoR§ Able Pumping30WS W COM M E R CE ST§ City of DallasPavaho PumpingPlantRTG35ESINGLETON BLVDFOIN§ OREVDDRRAV EO AAVBLN WESTMOREL AND RDERDelta PumpingPlantADSPM CKNT AREETCBaker PumpingPlantC ANDAV O N D A L EL mARHampton PumpingPlantTrin ity RiverDBRKGEIRVING BLVDERIRDEGCHFoMOOWRAL« RrkW183IN1-2VDBLW
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014SP O RT S STAble Pumping Plant OutfallAble SumpFFRSTPOND 3STAESTIZSOSTPOND 4DERAFFYJEBUFWGONOSTNELLULDSTSTB R A ZO S S TSTVERFHRIRONTNTOTHSRLPOND 5BLVDPOND ANMLLSTNGVDBLALIY RESTZALNCKDNIARCOSTLBRINALWENSTARYREEGAUSTRDCAPOND 2SARKOSTMIZLAAKITERTrinity RiverSINVSTDallas Floodway Levee SystemNBTRRIEAOICELGStreetSTNHOTSAblePumping PlantINISTHPOND 1Able PumpingPlant Outfall STL DRNLO RI ATOUPAME MNCAGNDBE RV NON S SARO CK IS LMS S T EMLegendEBE RVES R L T H O R N TO N SSTAble Pumping PlantSTPOND 8POND 611 4 « «18 3RPE §35 EDallas12 §30POND 9ETÊÚIM §ER §30RD §35 E0Meters75 150 225 3000250 500 750 1,000 §45Figure 1-2Existing Able Pumping Plant and SumpFeetSources: City of Dallas 2006, 2009d; NCTCG 20081-3W
Proposed Able Pumping Plant ImprovementsEnvironmental AssessmentJune 2014The same levees that protect the City of Dallas from Trinity River flooding also block local stormwaterrunoff from the interior (developed) side of the levee from reaching the Trinity River. This stormwaterrunoff on the developed side of the levee is referred to as “interior drainage.” Thus, the City of Dallasmanages interior drainage by allowing the stormwater runoff to pool in sumps (low areas) in interior areasbefore pumping or gravity feeding it into the Trinity River within the Dallas Floodway. For the last 75years, the City of Dallas (in cooperation with the USACE) has employed this strategy for managingstormwater in the EWLIDS.The City of Dallas Trinity River Flood Control District (TRFCD) operates and maintains the DallasFloodway and EWLIDS under the regulatory control of the USACE (City of Dallas 2006). The City ofDallas TRFCD uses a sophisticated Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system tocontrol and monitor the operation of the pumping plants. As part of the system, the City of Dallas TRFCDincorporates a network of closed-circuit television cameras and an Automated Local Evaluation in RealTime reporting system that provides real-time measurements of precipitation and stream and
This Page Intentionally Left Blank. Proposed Able Pumping Plant Improvements Environmental Assessment June 2014 ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) has prepared this Environmental Assessment (EA) in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 United States Code .
[This Page Intentionally Left Blank] Contents Decennial 2010 Profile Technical Notes, Decennial Profile ACS 2008-12 Profile Technical Notes, ACS Profile [This Page Intentionally Left Blank] Decennial 2010 Profile L01 L01 Decennial 2010 Profile 1. L01 Decennial 2010 Profile Sex and Age 85 and over 80 84 75 79 70 74
This page intentionally left blank. This paper does not represent US Government views. This paper does not represent US Government views. Mexico, the Caribbean, and Central America: The Impact of Climate Change to 2030 A Commissioned Research Report . This page is intentionally kept blank.
Source: AFP PHOTO/KCNA VIA KNS Information cutoff date, February 2018. DIA-05-1712-016. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY V GLOBA UCLEA LANDSCAE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Executive Summary VI. Section One: Russia 8 .
Part Number Suffix Polyamide Cage TNG/TNH TN9 TVP, TVH -- PRB Steel Cage Blank Blank Blank Blank Blank 2 Contact Seals 2RS 2RS1 2RSR LLU PP 2 Shields 2Z 2Z 2ZR ZZ FF Tight Clearance C2 C2 C2 C2 H Normal Clearance Blank Blank Blank Blank R Greater than Normal Clearance C3 C3 C3 C3 P Interchange Nomenclature 32 10 Basic Type & Series
Anesthesia: Blank Blank: Blank Blank: 2.43 5% Sample: 10004 Blank FNA BX W/O IMG GDN EA ADDL; Surgery Blank; 0.80 0.34; 0.58 Blank; RBRVS 10005 Blank; FNA BX W/US GDN 1ST LES Surgery
This page intentionally left blank . TRADOC Pamphlet 525-3-8 . i Preface . From the Commander . . (Recommended Changes to Publications and Blank Forms) to Director, TRADOC ARCIC (ATFC- ED), 950 Jefferson Avenue, Fort Eustis, VA 23604 - 5763. Suggested improvements may also be submitted using DA Form 1045 (Army Ideas for Excellence Program .
This page intentionally left blank [50] Develop computer programs for simplifying sums that involve binomial coe-cients. . satisfy one; see theorems 4.4.1 on page 65 and 6.2.1 on page 105). The output recurrence will look like eq. (6.1.3) on page 102. In this example zeilprints
LEFT FORK LEG RIGHT FORK LEG. 3 MNTIN INSTRTINS Öhlins Front Fork kit assembly 60206-03 21907-03 00338-83 60005-39 21906-03 21903-01 00338-42 7: 04752-04 . This page intentionally left blank. This page intentionally left blank. Öhlins sia o. Ltd 700/937 Moo5, Tambol Nongkhaga, mphur Phantong, honburi Province
