Pediatric Gastrointestinal Bleeding: Perspectives From The Italian .

1y ago
7 Views
1 Downloads
913.46 KB
11 Pages
Last View : 1d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Randy Pettway
Transcription

World J Gastroenterol 2017 February 28; 23(8): 1328-1337Submit a Manuscript: http://www.wjgnet.com/esps/DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i8.1328ISSN 1007-9327 (print) ISSN 2219-2840 (online)REVIEWPediatric gastrointestinal bleeding: Perspectives from theItalian Society of Pediatric GastroenterologyClaudio Romano, Salvatore Oliva, Stefano Martellossi, Erasmo Miele, Serena Arrigo, Maria Giovanna Graziani,Sabrina Cardile, Federica Gaiani, Gian Luigi de’Angelis, Filippo TorroniClaudio Romano, Unit of Pediatrics, Department of HumanPathology in Adulthood and Childhood “G. Barresi”, Universityof Messina, 98125 Messina, Italymade and the views expressed are solely the responsibility of theauthors.Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which wasselected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by externalreviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the CreativeCommons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license,which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon thiswork non-commercially, and license their derivative works ondifferent terms, provided the original work is properly cited andthe use is non-commercial. See: atore Oliva, Department of Pediatrics and InfantileNeuropsychiatry, Pediatric Gastroenterology and Liver Unit,Sapienza University of Rome, 00161 Rome, ItalyStefano Martellossi, Institute for Maternal and Child HealthIRCCS ‘Burlo Garofalo’, 34137 Trieste, ItalyErasmo Miele, Department of Translational Medical Science,Section of Pediatrics, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131Naples, ItalyManuscript source: Invited manuscriptSerena Arrigo, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, G.Gaslini Children’s Hospital-IRCCS, 16147 Genoa, ItalyCorrespondence to: Claudio Romano, MD, Unit of Pediatrics,Department of Human Pathology in Adulthood and Childhood “G.Barresi”, University of Messina, Viale Consolare Valeria, 98125Messina, Italy. romanoc@unime.itTelephone: 39-90-2212918Fax: 39-90-2212117Maria Giovanna Graziani, Gastroenterology and EndoscopyUnit, “San Giovanni Addolorata” Hospital, 00184 Rome, ItalySabrina Cardile, Hepatology, Gastroenterology and NutritionUnit, Bambino Gesù Children’s Hospital, 00165 Rome, ItalyReceived: September 18, 2016Peer-review started: September 19, 2016First decision: December 19, 2016Revised: January 1, 2017Accepted: January 17, 2017Article in press: January 17, 2017Published online: February 28, 2017Federica Gaiani, Gian Luigi de’Angelis, Gastroenterology andEndoscopy Unit, University of Parma, 43126 Parma, ItalyFilippo Torroni, Department of Surgery and Transplantation,Digestive Surgery and Endoscopy Unit, Bambino Gesù Children’sHospital, IRCCS, 00165 Rome, ItalyAuthor contributions: Romano C and Torroni F contributedsubstantially to the study conception and design; Oliva S,Martellossi S, Miele E, Arrigo S, Graziani MG, Cardile S andde’Angelis GL conducted the literature search and drafted themanuscript; all the authors approved the final manuscript andagree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.AbstractThere are many causes of gastrointestinal bleeding(GIB) in children, and this condition is not rare, havinga reported incidence of 6.4%. Causes vary with age,but show considerable overlap; moreover, whilemany of the causes in the pediatric population aresimilar to those in adults, some lesions are unique tochildren. The diagnostic approach for pediatric GIBincludes definition of the etiology, localization of theSupported by the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology,Hepatology and Nutrition.Conflict-of-interest statement: All authors declare that theyhave no conflict of interest. The data presented, the statementsWJG www.wjgnet.com1328February 28, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 8

Romano C et al . Pediatric gastrointestinal bleedingintestinal tract, from the mouth to the anus. Fortunately,mortality for acute gastrointestinal bleeding (AGIB) islow in the pediatric population.Over the last 10 years, there have been a numberof improvements in diagnosis and management of GIBin general. Increased involvement has been seen inthe management of AGIB and resuscitation and in thecorrect usage of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy.In addition, GIB cases have benefited from advancesin diagnostic and therapeutic radiology techniques andequipment, as well as development of more selectiveand less invasive surgical approaches and of moreefficacious, tolerable and safe ulcer-healing drugs.These changes have modified the diagnostic andtreatment strategies for patients presenting with nonvariceal and variceal upper GIB (UGIB) and those withcolonic bleeding.The major objectives of GIB management areto reduce mortality and the need for major surgery.A secondary objective is to prevent unnecessaryhospital admission for patients presenting with minoror self-limited bleeding. This position paper providesrecommendations based on current evidence forbest practice in the management of acute UGIB andlower GIB (LGIB) in children; management of patientsover the age of 18 is not covered by this statement.This statement will be of interest for generalist andspecialized pediatricians, as well as general medicalprofessionals who may encounter pediatric patientsamong their patient population, such as acute phy sicians, gastroenterologists, gastrointestinal surgeons,endoscopists, pharmacists, anesthesiologists andnurses.The statement presented herein resulted from afirst-phase systematic literature search and reviewby experts comprising the “Gastro-Ped Bleed Team”of the Italian Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology,Hepatology and Nutrition (SIGENP). The preliminarydraft was first circulated among the panel and asubsequent meeting was held, in which a consensuswas reached on the points touched, resulting in thefinal statement that is presented herein. It is importantto note that this position paper is not intended to beconstrued or to serve as a standard of care. Standardsof care are determined on the basis of all clinicaldata available for an individual case and are subjectto change as scientific knowledge and technologyadvances and patterns of care evolve.bleeding site and determination of the severity ofbleeding; timely and accurate diagnosis is necessary toreduce morbidity and mortality. To assist medical careproviders in the evaluation and management of childrenwith GIB, the “Gastro-Ped Bleed Team” of the ItalianSociety of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology andNutrition (SIGENP) carried out a systematic search onMEDLINE via PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) to identify all articles published in Englishfrom January 1990 to 2016; the following key wordswere used to conduct the electronic search: “upperGIB” and “pediatric” [all fields]; “lower GIB” and“pediatric” [all fields]; “obscure GIB” and “pediatric”[all fields]; “GIB” and “endoscopy” [all fields]; “GIB”and “therapy” [all fields]. The identified publicationsincluded articles describing randomized controlledtrials, reviews, case reports, cohort studies, casecontrol studies and observational studies. Referencesfrom the pertinent articles were also reviewed. Thispaper expresses a position statement of SIGENP thatcan have an immediate impact on clinical practiceand for which sufficient evidence is not available inliterature. The experts participating in this effort wereselected according to their expertise and professionalqualifications.Key words: Gastrointestinal bleeding; Endoscopy;Lower gastrointestinal bleeding; Upper gastrointestinalbleeding; Pediatric The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng PublishingGroup Inc. All rights reserved.Core tip: This review provides a practical diagnosticguide for clinicians for the diagnosis and managementof gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) in children. Clinicalpresentation can be variable and bleeding can occur inany area of the gastrointestinal tract. The differentialdiagnosis is important to define the sequence ofmanagement. Upper endoscopy and colonoscopy arethe mainstay of initial investigations. Best outcomesare possible by a multidisciplinary approach includingclinicians with skills in pediatric gastroenterology,radiology and surgery. For cases of major GIB, sta bilization of the patient’s condition precludes anydiagnostic examination.Romano C, Oliva S, Martellossi S, Miele E, Arrigo S, GrazianiMG, Cardile S, Gaiani F, de’Angelis GL, Torroni F. Pediatricgastrointestinal bleeding: Perspectives from the Italian Societyof Pediatric Gastroenterology. World J Gastroenterol 2017;23(8): 1328-1337 Available from: URL: tm DOI: NSUGIB is that originating proximal to the ligament ofTreitz, and, in practice, from the esophagus, stomachand duodenum. LGIB is defined as bleeding distalto the ligament of Treitz. Hematemesis (and coffeeground vomitus) is vomiting of blood from the uppergastrointestinal tract or, occasionally, after swallowing[1]blood from a source in the nasopharynx . Bright redhematemesis usually implies active hemorrhage fromINTRODUCTIONGastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) is a common conditionin children and can occur in any area of the gastro WJG www.wjgnet.com1329February 28, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 8

Romano C et al . Pediatric gastrointestinal bleedingTable 1 DefinitionsUpper gastrointestinal bleedingLower gastrointestinal bleedingOccult gastrointestinal bleedingGI bleeding originating proximal to the ligament of Treitz (esophagus, stomach and duodenum)GI bleeding originating distal to the ligament of Treitz (small bowel and colon)GI bleeding that is not visible to the patient or physician, resulting in either a positive fecal occult blood test oriron-deficiency anemiaVomiting of blood or coffee-ground-like materialPassage of fresh blood per anusPassage of black, tarry stools per anusHematemesisHematocheziaMelenaGI: Gastrointestinal.Table 2 Causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding based on ageInfantsEsophagusStomachGastritis from stressDuodenumVariable locationVitamin K deficiencySepsisTrauma (NG tubes)CMPA2-5 yearsOlderEsophagitisEsophageal varicesMallory-Weiss syndromeGastritisGastric ulcerGastric varicesDuodenitisDuodenal ulcerCaustic ingestionsForeign bodiesNSAIDs useEsophagitisMallory-Weiss syndromeEsophageal varicesDieulafoy lesionPHGHemobiliaPolypsCrohn’s diseaseTelangiectasiaAortoenteric fistulaCoagulation disordersCaustic ingestionsForeign bodiesNSAIDs useNG: Nasogastric; CMPA: Cow's milk protein allergy; NSAIDs: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; PHG: Portal hypertensive gastropathy.the esophagus, stomach or duodenum. Coffee-groundvomitus refers to the vomiting of black material, whichis assumed to be blood. Melena is the passage of blacktarry stools, usually due to acute UGIB but occasionallyfrom bleeding within the small bowel or right sideof the colon. Hematochezia is the passage of freshor altered blood via rectum, usually due to colonic[2]bleeding .Shock is circulatory insufficiency, resulting ininadequate oxygen delivery that leads to globalhypoperfusion and tissue hypoxia; in the contextof GIB, shock is most likely to be hypovolemic (dueto the inadequate circulating volume resulting fromacute blood loss). Varices are abnormal distendedveins, most frequently occurring in the esophagus(esophageal varices) and less frequently in thestomach (gastric varices) or other sites (ectopicvarices), and usually occurring as a consequence ofliver disease; variceal bleeding is characteristically[3]severe and may be life-threatening . Endoscopy is thevisualization of the inside of the gastrointestinal tractaccomplished by means of videoscope. Examination ofthe upper gastrointestinal tract (esophagus, stomachand duodenum) is known as gastroscopy or uppergastrointestinal endoscopy. Examination of the colon(large bowel) is referred to as colonoscopy. A list ofdefinitions is provided in Table 1.WJG www.wjgnet.comUGIBIn children, UGIB is an uncommon but potentiallyserious, life-threatening clinical condition. From ananatomical perspective, the UGIB tract encompassesthe gastrointestinal region from the esophagus to[4][5]the ligament of Treitz . A study by Cleveland et al ,involving 167 patients, showed the common signs andsymptoms of UGIB at presentation to be hematemesis(73%), melena (21%) and coffee-ground emesis (6%);however, patients may also experience epigastric pain,abdominal tenderness or dizziness.The worldwide mortality rate for UGIB in childrencan range from 5% to 15%, reflecting the diversepopulations that differentially experience conditionsassociated with UGIB, such as acute variceal hemorr [4,6]hage . The causes of UGIB have been classifiedbased upon variceal bleeding and non-variceal bleeding[7](Table 2) . Case series reported from Asia anddeveloping countries show a higher incidence of variceal[8]bleeding .The etiology of UGIB can be categorized by agegroups, but causative disorders overlap considerably[4]between these . In newborns, the predominantcauses include coagulation disorders, such as vitamin[9]K deficiency, cow’s milk protein allergy (CMPA) ,stress-related gastritis, sepsis, and trauma fromplacement of nasogastric tubes. In infants (1 mo to1330February 28, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 8

Romano C et al . Pediatric gastrointestinal bleedingendoscopy in UGIB are to identify the site of bleedingand to facilitate initiation of an appropriate therapeutic[5]approach when indicated .A flowchart of the diagnostic approach of UGIBis provided in Figure 1. In summary, UGIB refers tobleeding above the ligament of Treitz and the priorityof achieving a differential diagnosis addresses both theclinical presentation and the age of the patient.HistorySigns/symptomsEvaluate vital signsEnsure vascular accessPerform baseline testsNG lavageMinor bleedingStable/well-looking childMonitor of life-parametersMonitor hemoglobinMajor/ongoing bleedingResuscitation if necessaryConsider EGD within 24 hafter admissionLGIBLGIB in children is a common clinical problem; indeed, itis reportedly the presenting complaint for approximately[18]0.3% of children in the emergency department .In most cases, the bleeding is self-limiting, with themajority (80%) of LGIB cases in the emergency de [19]partment undergoing routine discharge . However,conditions such as Meckel’s diverticulum, melena byvariceal hemorrhages, acute intestinal obstruction orsevere attack of ulcerative colitis often present with lifethreatening GIB.The etiology of LGIB is very different betweenchildren and adults, and its incidence is age-dependent.The main causes of LGIB in adults are colorectalcancer, colorectal polyps, anorectal disease andinflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs); in children,colorectal polyps, chronic colitis and perianal lesions[20]are the main causes . In infants, allergic colitis andanorectal fissures represent the most common causes,while infectious enteritis and anorectal fissures are[21]the most common causes in older children(Table3). In young infants ( 1 year of age), the most likelycause of hematochezia with or (more often) withoutdiarrhea is the so-called allergic colitis; although CMPAis usually suspected, the etiology is often uncertain.In breastfed infants, without anemia, who are growingwell, hematochezia is usually a benign self-limitingdisorder, and a maternal milk-free diet is not necessarily[22]indicated .A valid approach to investigate the causes of LGIBis to classify it according to the child’s age, generalappearance (ill or well), bleeding rate, and stool charac [23]teristics . Meckel’s diverticulum should strongly besuspected, at any age, if bleeding is massive andaccompanied by both bright and dark red stools. Inill infants, ischemic/surgical causes, such as mid-gutvolvulus and intussusception, should be suspected. Inolder children, other serious medical causes, such assevere attack of ulcerative colitis, Henoch-Schonleinpurpura or hemolytic-uremic syndrome, might be the[24]cause of bleeding .In cases of severe LGIB, especially when melenais present or the patient is hemodynamically unstable,the source of bleeding may include the upper[25]gastrointestinal region . In cases with bloody diarrheathat is persistent ( 7 d), recurrent or severe ( 7bloody stools/d), the child should be seen by a pediatricgastroenterologist with indication to endoscopy. Rectalbleeding with normal stool pattern is suggestive ofFigure 1 Diagnostic approach of upper gastrointestinal bleeding ininfants and children. NG: Nasogastric; EGD: Upper endoscopy.1 year of age), the most prevalent causes are causticingestions, duplication cysts, foreign body ingestion,and medication-induced. In toddlers and youngchildren (1 year to 5 years of age), causes includeerosive esophagitis, gastritis, caustic ingestions,peptic ulcer bleeding, varices, and vomiting-inducedbleeding (e.g., from a Mallory-Weiss tear). In childrenand adolescents (ages 5 years to 18 years), bleedingcan arise from coagulation disorders, gastritis,Dieulafoy lesions (angiodysplasia), erosive esophagitis,peptic ulcer disease, caustic ingestions, and vomiting[10]induced bleeding .Crohn’s disease is an uncommon cause of UGIB in[11]the pediatric population . Certain foods may createconfusion by mimicking the appearance of bloodin vomitus [e.g., artificial (red) food-coloring, fruitflavored drinks, fruit juices, and beets]. All findingssuspicious of blood in vomitus should be clinically inves [12]tigated further .The current diagnostic approach for pediatricUGIB has been mostly extrapolated from studies ofadults; the key points are extensive history-taking andexamination, laboratory evaluations, and diagnostic[13]procedures . Maternal sources of blood includeingestion of blood during the delivery or from crackednipples during breastfeeding; infants who ingestmaternal blood may present with hematemesis or[4]melena . Historical information includes the presenceof abdominal pain, coffee-ground-like emesis, dys phagia, black and tarry stools, bright red blood viarectum, hematemesis, and chest pain. In addition,drug use should be elicited, especially any previ oususe of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs),[14]aspirin and/or corticosteroids . The physician shouldalso ascertain a history of peptic ulcer bleeding orsurgery, as well as any previous episodes of UGIB and[15]previous history of umbilical catheterization .In newborns with suspected UGIB, an alkalidenaturation test (i.e., the Apt-Downey test) candifferentiate neonatal blood from maternal blood.Gastric lavage via nasogastric tube can improve the[16,17]accuracy of endoscopy. Upper endoscopy is thetest of choice for evaluating hematemesis. The goals ofWJG www.wjgnet.com1331February 28, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 8

Romano C et al . Pediatric gastrointestinal bleedingTable 3 Causes of lower gastrointestinal bleeding based on ageInfantsNon-specific colitisAnal fissureMilk allergyDuplication of bowelVolvulusHirschsprung’s diseaseNecrotizing enterocolitisBleeding diathesis2-5 yearsOlderPolypsAnal fissureInfectious enterocolitisIntussusceptionMeckel’s diverticulumHenoch-Schonlein purpuraHemolytic-uremic syndromeLymphonodular hyperplasiaAngiodysplasiaAnal fissureInfectious EnterocolitisPolypsInflammatory bowel diseaseLymphonodular hyperplasiaHenoch-Schonlein purpuraAngiodysplasiaHemolytic-uremic syndromeBleeding diathesisthe presence of juvenile polyp, nodular lymphoidhyperplasia or eosinophilic colitis, as well as IBD and,rarely, vascular malformations.In a retrospective cross-sectional study, de Ridder[26]et alreported data of 137 children undergoingcolonoscopy for rectal bleeding (mean duration of 28wk). The diagnosis rate for first colonoscopy (IBD andcolonic polyps) was 80%. No abnormalities were foundin 20.4% of the patients, either by colonoscopy orhistopathology, and the final diagnosis for these caseswas self-limited GIB.Constipation is commonly associated with the pre sence of anal fissure and pain on defecation. Visualinspection of the perianal area as well as digital rectalexamination are mandatory to detect the possibilityof anal fissure, streptococcal cryptitis or rectal polyp.Endoscopy within 6 h after the first evaluation is rarelyneeded; in cases of severe colitis, a rapid diagnosisand histological evaluation may necessitate a procto [23]sigmoidoscopy without bowel cleansing .In conclusion, the main priority for the physicianin evaluating a patient with LGIB is to identify thosepatients in whom bleeding is secondary to intestinalobstruction or surgical causes. An algorithm of thediagnostic approach of LGIB is presented in Figure 2.count and group, liver and kidney function, bloodcoagulation) as well as a pre-anesthesia examination.For cases of UGIB, nasogastric aspiration and salinelavage are indicated to confirm the presence of[27]intragastric blood , to determine the rate of grossbleeding, to check for ongoing or recurrent bleeding,to clear the gastric field for subsequent endoscopicvisualization, to prevent aspiration of gastric contentsand to prevent hepatic encephalopathy in patientswith cirrhosis. Parenteral vitamin K (1-2 mg/dose)should be administered empirically to infants, evenwhen results of coagulation are pending. The finding ofcoagulopathy with an international normalized ratio 1.5 or abnormal partial thromboplastin time should becorrected by administration of fresh frozen plasma (10mL/kg initially); cryoprecipitate administration may betried in the presence of severe coagulopathy, especiallyif the volume of fluid has to be restricted.In conclusion, supportive measures with stabilizationof hemodynamic status, correction of any coagulation orplatelet abnormalities are necessary before diagnosticprocedures are undertaken.PRIMARY CLINICAL MANAGEMENTObscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) is definedas bleeding of unknown origin that persists or recursafter negative findings on initial evaluation using[28]bidirectional endoscopy . It can be classified asovert or occult, based on presence or absence ofclinically-evident bleeding. Obscure-occult bleeding isgenerally determined by a positive fecal occult blood[29]test result and/or iron-deficiency anemia . Chronicoccult GIB may occur anywhere in the gastrointestinaltract-from the oral cavity to the anorectum. In mostcases, the site is identified by upper endoscopy andileocolonoscopy. Causes depend on age of presentation(i.e., infants, children, adolescents) and location ofgastrointestinal tract bleeding. OGIB may be active, aswith melena, hematochezia or hematemesis, or it maybe inactive, showing intermittent bleeding.[30]Similar to data from adult patients , OGIBaccounts for 5% of all pediatric cases of GIB, includingboth acute overt and chronic occult types of blood loss.In approximately 75% of OGIB cases, the lesions areOBSCURE GASTROINTESTINALBLEEDINGStabilization of general conditions should precede anyinstrumental investigation (usually endoscopy) forchildren with GIB. The best clinical indicator of bloodloss is orthostatic changes in heart rate and bloodpressure; defined as an increase in pulse rate by 20beats/min or a decrease in systolic blood pressureof 10 mmHg or more upon moving the patient fromsupine to sitting position. For any other emergencysituation, the first priority should be to assess the[5]airways, breathing and circulation of the patient .The most important aspect of the initial GIBevaluation is to determine the degree and rapidity ofblood loss, and any risk factors (i.e., coagulopathy,sepsis, trauma) or associated signs (i.e., purpuriclesions, hepatosplenomegaly, jaundice, cutaneous[7]hemangiomas, eczema) . In the case of a childwith no clinical impairment, it is sufficient to ensurevascular access and perform baseline tests (i.e., bloodWJG www.wjgnet.com1332February 28, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 8

Romano C et al . Pediatric gastrointestinal bleedingLower gastrointestinal bleedingSymptoms/signsof acute abdomenSevere and/orongoing GI bleedingHemodinamicstabilizationUrgentreferral topediatricsurgeryX-ray and/orultrasoundLook forMeckel’sdiverticuliumor UGIBScintigraphyEGDSLaparoscopySigns of colitis(bloody diarrhoea)Persistent( 7 d)Rectal bleedingAcute( 6 d)Evaluateanorectalarea and/orconstipationObserveStool cultureConstipation orperianal lesionabsentColonoscopyFigure 2 Diagnostic approach of lower gastrointestinal bleeding in infants and children. UGIB: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding; GI: Gastrointestinal.detected in the small bowel (mid-GIB) distal to Vater’spapilla and reaching as far as the terminal ileum.The source of mid-GIB is related to age, with childrenshowing a greater likeliness of having small intestinalpolyps, Meckel’s diverticulum, vascular malformations,Crohn’s disease, anastomotic ulcers and intestinal[31]duplications .Diagnostic approaches for OGIB, after negativeendoscopy and colonoscopy, can require small bowelendoscopic investigation by video capsule endoscopy(VCE). Balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE), with singleor double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE), is the secondline technique, having the advantage of therapeuticas well as diagnostic properties. The diagnostic yieldis very good (70%-100%), and is significantly higherwhen BAE is performed after a positive VCE. In arecent pediatric study of 117 children treated with DBE[32](total of 257 procedures), Yokoyama et alfoundthe greatest indication to be OGIB (61.9%) and a lowincidence of complications (5.4%), regardless of theassociated therapeutic procedures.Intraoperative enteroscopy, involving insertion ofan endoscope through an incision in the mid-smallintestine, is currently reserved as a last option, orif small intestinal endoscopy cannot be successfullyperformed. Laparoscopy and exploratory laparotomyremain important alternative diagnostic tools, for whenother measures cannot identify a bleeding source in[33]selected patients .In conclusion, it is reasonable to perform both upperWJG www.wjgnet.comendoscopy and colonoscopy in a patient with OGIB(overt or occult) to identify pathological processes thatcan explain symptoms or iron-deficiency anemia.IMAGING STUDIESRadiological imaging has played an increasinglyimportant role in the diagnosis and management of GIBover the past 30 years. Magnetic resonance imaging hasemerged as key pediatric imaging modality, preferredfor its lack of ionizing radiation; it is particularly suitablefor studying small bowel pathologies, and is currentlythe first-line modality for such. The exact source of GIBmay be localized by means of nuclear scintigraphy, aswell as selective angiography. In general, examinationby imaging is most commonly requested after negativeendoscopy results, or for indeterminate causes orlocations of bleeding.The role of interventional radiology has also in creased over the past years for the treatment ofgastrointestinal hemorrhage, especially in very illpatients who are poor surgical candidates. Nuclearscintigraphy is a sensitive method for detecting GIB(used at a rate of 0.1 mL/min) and the method is[34]more sensitive, but less specific, than angiography .Although arteriographic diagnosis and therapy havebeen reviewed extensively in the literature describingadult cases, few experiences in children have beenreported. In one published pediatric study, whichinvolved 27 children, arteriography had an overall1333February 28, 2017 Volume 23 Issue 8

Romano C et al . Pediatric gastrointestinal bleeding[41,42]positive diagnostic rate of 64% and a false-negativerate of 36%. In AGIB, the diagnosis was correct in71% and falsely negative in 29%, while in chronicor recurrent GIB, it was correct in 55% and falsely[35]negative in 45% .The only angiographic sign that is 100% diagnosticfor AGIB is contrast extravasation in the intestinallumen. However, other angiographic signs can be usefulin evaluation of some of the more common pediatricpathologies that cause GIB. One of the main advantagesof angiographic diagnosis of GIB is the ability to performtranscatheter treatment after the bleeding site hasbeen located. The two main transcatheter therapiesare intraarterial vasopressin infusion and embolization.The most serious complication related to the technique[36]is bowel infarction. Hongsakul et alreported therisk factors as being failure to achieve hemostasis,hemoglobin concentration, coagulopathy, UGIB, contrastextravasation, and 1 embolized vessel.and portal pressure.Terlipressin has an important systemic vaso constrictor effect, which is more noticeable on thesplanchnic arteries, causing an increase in systemicvascular resistance and arterial pressure as well asa significant (approximately 20%) and sustained(up to 4 h) decrease in portal vein pressure and[43,44]flux. Several randomized trials and meta-analyseshave suggested that terlipressin provides a survivalbenefit, compared to placebo, to patients with variceal[45,46]bleeding. In adults, terlipressin can be consideredas the first choice, with somatostatin or octreotide asthe second choice. However, many studies that havecompared the clinical efficacies of different types ofvasoactive drugs, each administered as monotherapy,have found no differences in mortality rates. Studiesin pediatric populations have yet to show the potentialsuperiority of terlipressin over other vasoactive[47]agents; however, Erkek et alreported a single-childexperience of its use for successful management ofsevere non-variceal UGIB. Studies have shown thatterlipressin has a very good safety profile, comparedto vasopressin, although adverse events such ashyponatremia and seizure have been described inchildren (thus, necessitating monitoring of sodium[48]levels) .Octeotride is a synthetic derivative of somatostatin.It produces selective splanchnic vasoconstriction anddecreases portal inflow, thereby indirectly reducingvariceal blood flow. In children, intravenously-admi nistered octreotide is effective in decreasing AGIB.Studies of pediatric populations have demonstratedocteotride to be effective at dosages of 2

Serena Arrigo, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, G. Gaslini Children's Hospital-IRCCS, 16147 Genoa, Italy Maria Giovanna Graziani, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, "San Giovanni Addolorata" Hospital, 00184 Rome, Italy Sabrina Cardile, Hepatology, Gastroenterology and Nutrition Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, 00165 Rome .

Related Documents:

Summary Diagnosis ICD-10 Neonate Hematemesis Hematochezia Melena Stool occult blood Upper gastrointestinal bleeding Coffee ground [NG lavage] Coffee ground emesis Lower gastrointestinal bleeding Gastrointestinal bleeding Rectal bleeding K92.0 K92.1 K92.1 R19.5 K92.2 K92.2 K92.0 K92.2 K92.2 K6

Communication Skills Learning Tools for the Pediatric Clerkship 37 Pediatric History Taking Approach to the Pediatric Patient 38-39 Explanation of Pediatric H&Ps/Pediatric Database 40-43 Example H&Ps (older child and infant) 44-52 Pediatric Physical Examination Benchmarks for Pediatric Physical Examination 53 54-65

Primary Principles of Immediate Response Ensure your own safety The ABCs of Bleeding A – Alert – call 9-1-1 B – Bleeding – find the bleeding injury C – Compress – apply pressure to stop the bleeding by: 1. Covering the wound with a clea

The physicians at Albany Med's Bernard & Millie Duker Children's Hospital are specially trained in more than 40 pediatric fields, including pediatric pulmonary disease, pediatric surgery, pediatric gastroenterology, pediatric anesthesia and pediatric neurology. Albany Med houses the region's only Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) and

gastrointestinal alterations. Results: There was a high prevalence of overweight children with autism spectrum disorder (64.1%). No child was underweight. Thirty-four children (84.2%) had gastrointestinal symptoms. Consumption of gluten was associated with gastrointestinal symptoms (β 0.38; 95%CI 0.07–0.75; p 0.02).

Medical, nursing, pharmacy and allied health staff work collaboratively to perform gastrointestinal bleeding risk assessment and clinical assessment. Delivering comprehensive care to prevent and manag

Tintinalli’s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide, 8e Chapter 96: Abnormal Uterine Bleeding Bophal Sarha Hang INTRODUCTION Abnormal uterine bleeding is an overarching term that is defined as bleeding from the uterine corpus that is irregular in volume, frequency, or duration in absence of pregnancy (Table 96–1).1 Vaginal bleeding .

11/9/2015 2 Definitions Negative EGD and colonoscopy potential small bowel bleeding Obscure GI bleeding: No source despite EGD, colonoscopy, VCE and radiographic testing 4 Overt bleeding melena, hematemesis, hematochezia Occult bleeding iron deficiency anemia without melena or hematochezia 5 Definitions