GROUNDING, BONDING, AND SHIELDING PRACTICES T I - William J. Hughes .

1y ago
3 Views
1 Downloads
3.96 MB
77 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Axel Lin
Transcription

REPORT N.O. FAA-RD-78-88SURVEYOF, .GROUNDING, BONDING, AND SHIELDING PRACTICEStIIH.W.DennyJ. A. WoodyMAFICL1BR.ARTJUN9 76. . APRIL 1976FINAL REPORTDocument is avai lable to the public through theNational Technical Information Service,Springfield, Virginia 22161.Prepared foru.s. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONFEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATIONSystems Research & Development ServiceWashington, D.C. 20590

NOTICEThis document is disseminated under the sponsorship ofthe Department of Transportation in the interest of infor mation exchange. The United States Government assumes noliability for its contents or use thereof.

Technical Iileport Documentation Page1.Report No.2. Government Accession No.3.Recipient' 5 Catalog No.FAA-RD-76-684. Title and Subtitle5. Report DateSurvey of Grounding, Bonding, and ShieldingPracticesIApril 19766. Performing Organization Code8. Performing Orgoni zation Report No.7. Author's)H. W. Denny and J. A. Woody9.10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS)Performing Organization Name and AddressEngineering Experiment StationGeorgia Institute of TechnologyAtlanta, Georgia 303321l. Contract or Grant No.DOT-FA72WA-285013. Type of Report and Period CoveredFinal ReportMay 1974 - December 197512. Sponsoring Agency Nome ond AddressDepartment of TransportationFederal Aviation AdministrationSystems Research and Development ServiceT.T:;'oh . t- . n,-.14.Sponsoring Agency Code,ARD-35 0 (215 607)?Oc;QO15. Supplementory Notes16. AbstractIn May 1974 detailed surveys were made of the grounding, bonding, shielding,and lightning protection networks in FAA facilities at Hartsfield InternationalAirport, Atlanta, GA and in selected AF facilities at Robins AFB, GA and Aiken AFS,Aiken, SC. At the facilities the earth electrode system, the lightning protectionsystem, fault protection and signal ground networks, bonding practices, and facil ity shielding were evaluated. Similarly, the equipments in each facility wereexamined to determine the grounding procedures used for both low frequency andhigh frequency signals, the type of signal interfacing used, the bonding practicesemployed, and the type of shielding available for both personnel protection andEMI control. This report presents the findings of the surveys, compares theexisting networks and practices with those which have been recommended for newfacilities, and suggests corrective measures for the noted deficiencies.184 Distribution Statement17. Key WordsDocument is available to the publicthrough the National TechnicalInformation Service, Springfield, VA22151Grounding, Bonding, ShieldingNational Electrical CodeLightning Protection, EMIField Surveys19. Security Clossif. (of this report)Form DOT F 1700.720. Security Cla sif. (of this poge). UnclassifiedUnclassified(8-72)Reproduction of completed page author; zed21. No. of Pages6922. Price

METRIC CONVERSION FACTORSApproximate Conversions to Metric MeasuresSymbolWben You KnowMultiply by'"To FindSymbol-. quareacres6.50.090.82.60.4inchesfeetyardsmi les.em2m2m2km 2square centimeterssquare meterssquare meterssquare kilometershectaresozI ouncespoundsshort tons280.450.9fI ozeptqtgal1t3yd 3515300.240.470.953.8O.oJ0.76 enFahrenheittemperature5/9 (altersubtractingWhen You KnowMultiply byTo smilesr- :!i-- .square centimeterssquare meterssquare ki lometersm22km-ha -."- -- -- --"Isquare inchessquare yardssquare mi lasacres0.161.20.42.5hectares (10.000 m2 ) ---.,,- -' ". -.--".," .enl AREAMASS (weight);:gramsgkgtkilogramstonnes- - -.mlmlmlmillilitersmiHiliter milliliterslitersliterslitersliterscubic meterscubic metersI--IJIm3m3Celsiustemperature"c32)·1 in 2.54Iex 'lctly). for other exact conversions and more detailed tables, st;le NBSUmts of Weights and Measures. Price 2.25. SO Catalog No. C13.1 0:286.MISC.Publ. 286,.-., -;;n::r'" ---.-short tortsmillilitersliterslitersliterscubic meterscubic metersIIIm3m3fluid ouncespintsquarts0.032.11.060.26351.3gallonscubic feet.cubic yardsTEMPERATURE (exact)"c9/5lthenadd "--kilogramslonnes (1000 kg)VOLUME0-Iouncespounds0.0352.21.1gramsen -'"gkgt -TEMPERATURE (exlct)"FSvmbol --VOLUMEteaspoons·--tabl-espeonsfluid ouncescupspintsqllartsgallonscubic feetcubic yards-.-'"(2000 Ib)tspTbsp-'"--.haMASS (weight)Approximlte Conversions from Metric Menures0AREAin 21t 2yd2mil.---LENGTHinItydmi.'".- uofof-40I-40 cI,I, I0, ,I ,-20324,1 ,00!'-I,98·6I'I,8 ,I' ,I O, Iiii20403760,I oiIi80I,2 ,1IlOb·C

FOREWORD 1This report was prepared by the Electronics Technology Laboratory ofthe Georgia Tech Engineering Experiment Station for the Federal AviationAdministration under Contract No. DOT-FA72WA-2850 with cosupport from theAir Force Communications Service.Technical cognizance of the program wasprovided by Mr. Raymond R. Barkalow, ARD-354 , of FAA.It was written underthe general supervision of Mr. D. W. Robertson, Director of the ElectronicsTechnology Laboratory.The principal author is Mr. H. W. Denny, SeniorResearch Engineer and Head of the EMC Group.This report is in response to Paragraph 4.2 of the EngineeringRequirement, FAA-ER-650-012a, of the contract which calls for a survey ofthe bonding, grounding, shielding, and lightning protection networks atthe FAA facilities at Hartsfield Airport in Atlanta, Georgia and at selectedAF facilities located at Robins AFB,Warner Robins, Georgia and at Aiken AFS,Aiken, South Carolina.iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSMost of the detailed inspection and testing of the grounding, bonding,shielding, and lightning protection networks at the various facilities wereperformed by Mr. J. A. Woody, Research Engineer, and Mr. Richard S. Smith,Assistant Research Engineer, of the EMC Group at Georgia Tech.Mr. Woodydid much of the reduction of data and prepared the initial summary offindings.He assisted in the formulation of the overall conclusions andrecommendations arising from the surveys and contributed to the writing ofthis report.The assistance of Mr. Barkalow, the FAA technical monitor, andMr. Warren Keller, EPEUM, of Air Force Communications Service in theselection of survey sites, overall planning of the surveys, and adminis trative coordination of the site visits is acknowledged.A specific note of appreciation is extended to the several FAA andAF personnel who cooperated in and assisted with the surveys at the varioussites.In particular, Mr. C. E. Elmore, ASO-441.6, FAA Southern RegionalHeadquarters, and Mr. Byron Matthews, Navaids Unit Supervisor, AirwaysFacilities Section, Atlanta Airport, provided considerable help in theplanning and conduct of the surveys at the FAA facilities.Likewise,the assistance provided by Sgt. Hamm of 1926 Communications Squadron atRobins AFB and by Lt. Michael Allen of the 861 Radar Squadron at Aiken AFSwas instrumental in assuring the success of the surveys at the AF facilities.

TABLE OF CONTENTS1.INTRODUCTION 2.SURVEY FINDINGS. 2.12.32.43.4.1Hartsfield International Airport 12.1.12 2.21 .ATCT. . .2.1.1.1Earth Electrode System.22.1.1.2Safety Grounding . 22.1.1.3Signal Grounding.82.1.1.4Bonding and Shielding.102.1.1.5Lightning Protection.122.1.2Airport Surveillance Radar, ASR-7.122.1.3Instrument Landing Systems . . 162.1.4Remote Transmit/Receive (RTR) Sites 212.1.5VORTAC Site. 232.1.6Other Facilities .23Robins Air Force Base .242.2.1Communications Center.242.2.2Flight Line Facilities.28Aiken Air Force Station . 332.3.1AN/FPS-7 Search Radar.332.3.2AN/FPS-26 Height Finder Radar .342.3.3Ground-Air Transmit/Receive (GATR) Site.36Summary of Findings . . . . . . . . . .38DISCUSSION OF FINDINGS AND SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS FORCORRECTIVE ACTION. .413.1Earth Electrode Systems423.2Lightning Protection . 443.3Power Safety Grounding 493.4Signal Grounding.513.5Bonding.533.6Shielding., .543.7Supplemental Comments.56OVERALL RECOMMENDATIONS. 57APPENDIX A. . . . . . . . . .A-Iv

LIST OF FIGURES1.General Plan View of Atlanta's Hartsfield InternationalAirport .2. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3Layout of Earth Electrode System for the Hartsfield TerminalBuilding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4.Single Line Diagram of Safety Ground Network for CommunicationsArea and ATCT Circuit No. 6 (Atlanta Tower) . 5Grounding Network Configuration in Communications Equipment Area(Atlanta Tower) . . . . .75.ARTS-I Equipment Grounding Scheme . 96.An Example of Improperly Cleaned (Paint Not Removed) Surface3.4. . .Prior to Bonding. . . . . . . . . . . 117.Typical Low Frequency Cabling Practices 118.Ground Rod Configuration at ASR-7 Site.139.Earth Resistance Curves for ASR-715Radar System Interference Arising from Citizens BandTransceiver . . . . 1711.Results of Earth Resistance Measurement at Localizers 9R and 33 .1812.Example of An Improper Bond at Glide Slope 33 . . .2013.Severely Corroded Ground Rod Connection at Glide Slope 33 .10.14. 20Excessively Long Shield Pigtails on Low Frequency Cables atRTR-D . . . . . . . .2215.Severely Corroded Bonds at Compass Locator Site 2516.An Example of Damage to Unprotected Grounding Wire.2517.Configuration of TEMPEST Earth Ground at Communications Center(Robins AFB). . . . . . . . . . . . .2718.Logic Ground Configuration in Communications Center .2919.Inter-Equipment Cabling Practices . 3020.Coaxial Cable Grounding Practices .3021.Earth Resistance Data for AN/MRN-7 Localizer (Robins AFB)3222.Tower Grounding for the AN/FPS-7 Search Radar (Aiken AFS) . .3523.Representative Bond in Equipment Grounding Network in theAN/ APS-7 Tower. . . . . . . . . . . . . 3524.Lightning Arrester Installation on RF Antenna Leadin.25.Damaged Lightning Down Conductor . . 26.Examples of Good Cable Tray Bonding Practices . vi373739

1.INTRODUCTIONSurveys were conducted at Hartsfield International Airport in Atlanta,GA, at Robins Air Force Base, GA, and at Aiken Air Force Station in Aiken,SC during May 1974.These surveys consisted of an examination of the ground ing, bonding, shielding, and lightning protection practices at selected majorfacilities at each of the above locations.The earth electrode system, light ning protection system, fault protection and signal ground networks, bondingpractices, and facility shielding were evaluated in terms of the recommendationscontained in Report No. FAA-RD-75-2l5, "Grounding, Bonding, and ShieldingPractices and Procedures for Electronic Facilities and Equipments" (subse quently referred to herein as GBS Practices and Procedures).Similarly, theequipments in each facility were examined to determine the grounding proce .dures used for both low frequency and high frequency signals, thetyp ofsignal interfacing used, bonding practices employed, and the type of shieldingavailable for both personnel protection and EMI control.As an aid for use during the surveys, a survey form or worksheet wasprepared.A copy of the survey form is included as an appendix.This formwas employed to help remind the surveyors of topics to cover and things tolook for and to provide a convenient place to make notes and to record obser vations.2.2.1SURVEY FINDINGSHartsfield International AirportThe air traffic control tower (ATCT) and other major elements whichsupport the control of air traffic in the Hartsfield terminal area weresurveyed.The supporting facilities included (1) the ASR-7 airport sur veillance radar, (2) one VORTAC, (3) several instrument landing system (ILS)components, (4) one approach lighting system (ALS), (5) two runway visualrange (RVR) sites, (6) two remote transmitter-receiver (RTR) sites, and(7) a compass locator site.

2.1.1ATCTThe Hartsfield control tower which was surveyed is located withinthe main airport terminal complex * as shown on Figure 1.The equipment rooms,located on the eighth floor of the tower, and the tower cab were included inthe survey.The power vault on the ground floor along with selected elementsof the terminal's electrical distribution system (city-owned) were alsoexamined.For the tower proper, the earth .e1ectrode system and the lightning pro tection system were evaluated.Signal and safety grounding practices wereanalyzed, and measurements of the resistance between selected points on theground networks in the equipment room were made.Sample measurements werealso made of stray current levels in ground safety wires.2.1.1.1Earth Electrode SystemThe grounding network for the tower consists of clustersof three 10-foot ground rods distributed around the entire terminal buildingas shown on the drawing in Figure 2.This drawing indicates that the earthelectrode system for the terminal complex consists of a peripheral loop ofNo. 4/0 stranded bare copper cable interconnecting a total of 153 3/4 in. x10 ft. copper clad ground rods.The main I-beams for the tower are bondedto this peripheral ground loop.The grounding system was not accessible for either inspection or fortesting.Risers connected directly to the ground rods and the peripheralcable are accessible, but the soil in the vicinity of the terminal is coveredwith pavement and is not accessible.Thus, the resistance to earth providedby the tower's electrode system could not be measured.2.1.1.2Safety GroundingThe electrical safety grounding network associated withone of the main feeder circuits to the eighth floor is shown in Figure 3.The focal point of the electrical safety ground network is a silver bus bar*Short1y after the conduct of thistower was begun.su vey,2construction of a new control

NA- ILocalizerL. . -- ,. wI. .,.-,--- .-.-. . . . . . . .1 0, . -. -. .- .- . .-- -. .,,, 0,'"\Abstracted from1\ - FAA DWG No. SO-E-1428December 1970GEN ' L . PLANFigure 1.General Plan View of Atlanta's Hartsfield International,Airport

---------- . '. .,/:/ '\\\ .--------r ' ,- :/. \ .-----t-.-- .- \,, ;'.l\:. i:i!i.\-.:. . . . .:--.-- .,z--- \"\" ".,. . .\ \\,rr""\\,,.\ t \'.! .,.- Mal'" TE:. ' .\\--".-,,\ ,\\,/r.lc "" : - :. ,"\D l"\II . . --\.!"" ::' ' it.a. .:.\\ "rrl4 \.\rI/o ,. sl':, -. -- .,'--I eir.;':'fF:l- ""'i,/)' ,';;;:.t,;, .:' .\\./' t" \ MAIN UILPIN6COLUNN .i1?0",IoolCiN5It:.'''''' . [ ;, .f;ii" ' ':.:.,i - ! ':"; .I.TVPlCAL,/IIl ,/I,I.·""r"'- :;r.'?i: iI::"' ""I/,r/I,/'I.I/;//I''-'-, I.f//,- /Abstracted fromDrawing No. 55116-E-6Robert & Company Assoc.Atlanta, GAOctober 22, 1958-- --- .::.u . '"-'--/';.,\:::;::" ! pETAIL.:lt-r-il---.---/,.-.".,. - -0fsI .-.-- : .,///i:;'t--- .--- . - I-" :-;:-.-'- 1,/::'",.'",. ;,fti,'-- f:: .i\"" - ,.-i':!"l!!i ::. t·- t·- -- "', --- -1 ':I! I I t I i 't!II:/(;! : L.-1-JJ.·. .tJ . : I .QLpt\/ /"!l : -::I·:':' :1:''::"'' r. .,"IP,. !e",' .r."\-'//. /I CT: :: : 1: l r-J// " .d './. " .-. -. " -'\----\,I,//J/',\I""" .:/ I\ /;. ' . .ot--- --J:r:.-tI\ L., -------- .------ .,---:///'\ ,,,,,,;:."""'"""'EjJ- - ---;:I,II\L.J "--'\\,'-, ")/t'.-.,/Figure 2.Layout of Earth Electrode System for the HartsfieldTerminal Building.

itBreakerPower Panels are Connectedto Building I itBreakerConduitFusedSwitchFusedSwitchConduitAC DistributionBusFigure 3.Single Line Diagram of Safety Ground Network for CommunicationsArea and ATCT Circuit No.6 (Atlanta Tower).5

interconnecting the electrical distribution cabinets in the (city-owned)power vault.This bus bar is bonded to a building column and to the peri pheral ground loop.AC power for FAA equipment is delivered to the eighth floor with a pairof three-phase, 400-volt delta circuits.The 4-inch conduit surrounding thecircuit conductors is bonded to the silver bus bar located in the power vault.A separate grounding bus is not provided between the power vault and the stepdown transformers on the eighth floor.An auxiliary path to earth is shown on facility drawings as being avail able through structural steel elements, primarily the vertical I-beams.Thesecondary neutrals of the 440/220 transformers are connected to their respec tive cabinets.The cabinets in turn are shown on the drawings as being bondedto I-beams on the eighth floor.Thus, an additional fault clearance path backto the power vault ground bus is supposed to be provided by the tower columns.Attempts were made to obtain access to the steel I-beams in the equipment roomin order to verify that the connections were, indeed, made between the trans former neutral, i.e., power ground, and the structural elements.These at tempts were unsuccessful, and the connections could not be verified.A No. 4/0 stranded cable provides the grounding connection between thetransformer neutral and the main power distribution panels located insidethe equipment room.This safety ground connection is extended to equipmentracks with a No. 6 bare copper conductor routed through cable troughs andducts.Typifying this extension is Figure 4 which schematically illustratesthe configuration of the network in the communications equipment area.Sample measurements of stray 60 Hz current levels at various points onthe ground conductor network were made.Inside one power distribution panelthe No. 6 bare copper conductor leading to two radar equipment bays had 3amperes flowing in it.Similarly, one ampere was measured on a wire insidethe power distribution box in the airport surface detection (ASDE) room.No effort was made to sample every ground wire for stray currents.Spotchecks were made, however, of the stray current levels in the bare copperwires in the cable ducts above the equipment racks.No currents large enoughto be measured with a clamp-on ammeter were found in these wires.6

ToneGenerVHFVHFlReceivers Receiversators,I's:- .J L --.J' IL .JIDemarc, .-J I I: ! I JDemarc .,I.I48VPowerPanelI'IIL- J.j.J ;\;:l'"C:JNeutrall:l0uPowerpaoT C}, ;:l0l-l,\Neutral000l:l '"C:Jr-I ;:lP::l0Eo- -.L VPowerPanelAmplifiersII IT:ans m1tterRelayPanelf-J L 'I'L T48VPowerPanel'IIL IIIL 'IIL IIILI L 1.1r------- .I IIPowerPanel BI'L.,Trans mitterRelayPanelToneGener ators'I'TL .JL.'I'L -., r - - - - - - - - - - - - - J" II I,/RegulatecOutputAmplifiersRegulateclRegulated ersDualChannelAmplifiersDualChannelAmpli fiers'1'L J,I'L ,r . .J, , .L!L. I IIL .JIIL .1I IIL IIr-----------------.Jt-t- .J-If-olII, ivers ReceiverfII L -.1 -c .J I L .J I L"": .ITC .J I L ,r - - - - - - - - - - JII I,-.JRackUHFCABReceivers Monitor,I I 'II 'I' 'I', r------ JL L .JICABMonitor'IIL 1*ATIS - AutomaticTerminal InformationServiceL ----IIBuildingGroundFigure 4.Grounding Network Configuration in Communications Equipment Area(Atlanta Tower).7

2.1.1.3Signal GroundingExcept for the ARTS-I network described in the next para graph, no identifiable signal grounding networks separate from the safetyground network and the system of interconnected equipment racks were noted.Equipment chassis provide the signal reference points for both low and highfrequency signals.For example, low frequency * signals such as thoseasso ciated with audio communication, monitor, and control circuits are groundedto the chassis internal to the equipments.At the same time, high frequencysignals, such as those associated with the RF portions of communicationsreceivers, microwave equipment, etc., are also referenced (grounded) tochassis.The equipment chassis are fastened to the racks.The racks inturn are connected together and to the power panels through the cable ductsand raceways and with the No. 6 bare copper conductor.Thus, this intercon nected metallic network serves as the equipment signal ground as well as theequipment safety ground.A special grounding network configured as shown in Figure 5 has beenInsulated No. 4/0 conductors extend frominstalled for the ARTS-I system.each equipment rack of the ARTS-I system to a common bus.mounted on insulators in a centrally located box.This bus isThe No. 4/0 cable indi cated in Figure 5 was described by FAA personnel as being connected to the**structural steel building frame.Unfortunately, the intent of this single-point ground network has beencompromised at several points.For example, the ARTS-I equipment cabinetsare clustered in groups of three.On two of the three cabinets in a clusterthe insulated ground wire is attached to an insulated terminal on the backof the cabinet.At the third cabinet, however, the ground wire is connecteddirectly to an uninsulated stud.All three cabinets in turn are electricallyinterconnected through mounting bolts and t]:1rough the cable tray assemblywhich is fastened to each cabinet.(Thus, the "isolated" ground network is,in fact, interconnected with all other cabinets, frames, ducts, power panels,etc. in the equipment room.)*Low frequency signals, as defined in Volume I, Section 7.3.4.3 of GBSPractices and Procedures are those signals below 1 MHz.**This connection could not be verified.8

oDigitizerExcept as noted, Ground Cablesare No. 3 Stranded.AzimuthDigitizerCardProcessorNo. 4/0 essorConsoleDisplayProcessorFigure S-I Equipment Grounding Scheme.ComputerTrackWhileScanTo Building Frame1004Key Punch

2.1.1.4Bonding and ShieldingVisual inspections and electrical measurements were madeon a representative number of bonds, both as implemented with direct metal to-metal contact and with intermediate conductors such as bare No. 6 copperwires. Only one or two isolated instances were noted of specific deficienciessuch as failure to clean surfaces before joining or failure to achieve andmaintain adequate tightness at fasteners.As an example, Figure 6 shows aconnection in a radar power distribution panel which was not properly cleanedprior to assembly.Several connections to the No. 6 bare copper conductornetwork described earlier were observed to be soldered.Physically, theseand other connections appeared to be in good condition with little or noevidence of corrosion.The resistance between the No. 4/0 copper building ground cable con nection in power panel C and the No. 6 bare copper conductor in the ductabove equipment bay No.4 (see Figure 4) was measured to be 2.3 milliohms.Between this same No. 4/0 cable and an equipment case in Rack No.3 of Bay 4,the resistance was measured to be 4.75 milliohms.Equipments located within the ATCT in general are not intentionallydesigned to provide a high degree of electromagnetic shielding.Althoughmost equipment cabinets and racks are not intentionally RF shielded, therewas no evidence that any supplemental shielding was needed.Since all com munication transmitters are at the RTR's (located 3/4 of a mile or more fromthe tower) and since other high power sources such as the ASR-7 transmitterand local commercial radio stations are either oriented away from the toweror are located at some distance away, the threat from high level RF signalsis limited.Most low frequency cable shields are not insulated * , as shown inFigure 7.Signal cable shields werenot dto be grounded either to thechassis of the terminating equipment or to a distribution panel ground.Some cables leading to other sites (such as an ILS, the RTR, an RVR, etc.)were observed to have their shields grounded at the tower end while others*See discussion in Section 3.6.10

Figure 6.An Example of Improperly Cleaned (Paint Not Removed)Surface Prior to Bonding.Figure 7.Typical Low Frequency Cabling Practices.11

were noted to be grounded at the remote facility.Yet other cablesrOl'; edbetween equipments within the tower complex were determined to be groundedon both ends.No serious noise problems were observed to exist as a resultof this nonuniform method of cable shield grounding.2.1.1.5Lightning ProtectionThe lightning protection system for the tower consists ofla-inch air terminals distributed around the perimeter of the cab roof andaround the edges of the tower building.Construction drawings indicate thatthese terminals are connected to the structural steel I-beams of the tower.The I-beams are bonded together at the base with No. 2/0 cables and arebonded to the encircling grounding conductor and then to the ground rods.Gas tubes, such as the commercial NE-2 neon bulb, are used extensivelyfor surge limiting at many terminal strips in the equipment room area.Thebulbs are connected between each signal or control line conductor and acommon No. 6 bare wire.2.1.2Airport Surveillance Radar, ASR-7The ASR-7 site consists of (1) an antenna tower; (2) the buildingwhich houses the radar. beacon, and remote microwave link (RML) equipment;(3) the emergency power generator building; and, (4) the commercial powertransformer.The site is located on a manmade hill near Runway 9R on thesouth side of the airport (see Figure 1).Thirty-eight, 3/4-inch by la-feet, copper clad ground rods provide theearth electrode system for the site.manner shown by Figure 8.buried three feet deep.The ground rods are distributed in theThey are interconnected with a bare No. 4/0 cableConnections are made to this electrode system atthe power transformer, at the standby generator, and at one point insidethe shelter.Two connections from the antenna tower are also made.The resistance of this electrode system was measured with a No. 63220Biddle Megger Earth Tester using the fall-of-potential method describedin Section 1.7.2, Volume I, GBS Practices and Procedures.Connection tothe earth electrode system was made inside the engine/generator van (marked12

were noted to be grounded at the remote facility.Yet other cables routedbetween equipments within the tower complex were determined to be groundedon both ends.No serious noise problems were observed to exist as a resultof this nonuniform method of cable shield grounding.2.1.1.5Lightning ProtectionThe lightning protection system for the tower consists of10-inch air terminals distributed around the perimeter of the cab roof andaround the edges of the tower building.Construction drawings indicate thatthese terminals are connected to the structural steel I-beams of the tower.The I-beams are bonded together at the base with No. 2/0 cables and arebonded to the encircling grounding conductor and then to the ground rods.Gas tubes, such as the commercial NE-2 neon bulb, are used extensivelyfor surge limiting at many terminal strips in the equipment room area.Thebulbs are connected between each signal or control line conductor and acommon No. 6 bare wire.2.1.2Airport Surveillance Radar, ASR-7The ASR-7 site consists of (1) an antenna tower; (2) the buildingwhich houses the radar, beacon, and remote microwave link (RML) equipment;(3) the emergency power generator building; and, (4) the commercial powertransformer.The site is located on a manmade hill near Runway 9R on thesouth side of the airport (see Figure 1) . Thirty-eight, 3/4-inch by 10-feet, copper clad ground rods provide theearth electrode system for the site.manner shown by Figure 8.buried three feet deep.The ground rods are distributed in theThey are interconnected with a bare No. 4/0 cableConnections are made to this electrode system atthe power transformer, at the standby generator, and at one point insidethe shelter.Two connections from the antenna tower are also made.The resistance of this electrode system was measured with a No. 63220Biddle Megger Earth Tester using the fall-of-potential method describedin Section 1.7.2, Volume I, GBS Practices and Procedures.Connection tothe earth electrode system was made inside the engine/generator van (marked12

C1 IIJ- -- -- - - . - - ---e- -- -"1II\II\ IIIII\\I I \I/II I.- fB . . . . - --,,/TOWER/'./II""'--/ /---- IIT\ II-.1/ I. .IT/R BUILDINGI IIItI Commercial PowerTransformerI- l lI IIi--4, No. 4/0 AWGBare CopperCableGround Rods3/4"II. - . -- - . IFigure 8.x10'Copper Clad-.- -(Typ.)I- --- Ground Rod Configuration at ASR-7 Site.13

point A on Figure 8).line ABC were used.Current probe spacings of 100 feet and 200 feet alongFigure 9 shows the results of these tests.Lightning protection for the site is provided by 3 air terminals mountedon the antenna platform.These air terminals extend high enough (see Section2.5.1, Volume I, GBS Practices and Procedures) to provide protection againsta direct strike to the radar and beacon antennas, and they simultaneouslyprotect the tower and adjacent structures.One down conductor connects theair terminals to the grounding cable at the base of the tower.The airterminals and the down conductor are bonded to the tower; thus, the towersteel provides supplemental down conductors from the air terminals to earth(see Paragraph 1.3.2.2.2i, Volume II, GBS Practices and Procedures).Power line surge protection is provided by secondary surge arrestersmounted inside the equipment shelter adjacent to the power distributionAn arrester is provided for each phase; the three arresters areconnected to the system of ground rods with a single No. 6 copper wire.panel.Standard National Electrical Code practices throughout the ASR-7 provideadequate protection against electrical fault hazards.Additional protectionis provided by a 4-inch wide copper strap which interconnects all equipmentcabinets of both radar channels with the patch panels and one of the powerpanels.At the connection between the copper bus and the power distributionpanel, paint was not rem

system, fault protection and signal ground networks, bonding practices, and facil ity shielding were evaluated. Similarly, the equipments in each facility were . examined to determine the grounding procedures used for both low frequency and high frequency signals, the type of signal interfacing used, the bonding practices

Related Documents:

Make sure that the blank shielding wire (5) is not removed. Twist this blank wire with the shielding (4) as shown below. Figure 2.3 - Blank shielding wire and shielding braid Blank shielding wire Outer sheath (jacket) (1) Filling threads (2) Power elements (3) Copper wire shielding (4) Blank shielding wire (5) Shielding foil (6) Isolation .

Grounding Study and Analysis: Substation Grounding Practices Grounding Concepts - GPR and Touch Potential AEP Innovative Grounding Study Methods Grounding Installation: Traditional Approach and Challenges Grounding Application and Installation Change Management Testing: Grounding Integrity Testing Conclusion and .

RADIATION SHIELDING DESIGN 2010 2010 Shielding Construction Solutions 1 ACMP 2010 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS – MAY 23, 2010 DANIEL G. HARRELL SHIELDING CONSTRUCTION SOLUTIONS, INC. . Graphic Image. DESIGN Shielding Material Data Shielding Design Sketch Specific Points Use & Occupancy Distance Obliquity Effective Thickness Unusual Conditions

Article 250.1 Scope. Article 250 is organized into 10 different parts that deal with specific requirements with regards to bonding and grounding. The specific parts are as follows: (I) General (II) System Grounding (III) Grounding Electrode System and Grounding electrode Conductor (IV) En

The purpose of this standard is to ensure the optimum performance of ground-based telecommunications equipment by reducing noise and providing adequate protection against power system faults and lightning strikes. This handbook emphasizes the necessity for including considerations of grounding, bonding, and shielding in all

NEC Table 250.122 - Minimum size equipment grounding conductors for grounding raceway and equipment Table 2 – Minimum size equipment grounding conductors for grounding raceway and equipment Aluminum Cable Tray Systems Table 392.60(A) – Metal area requiremen

personnel and equipment protection. Shielding must (1) protect the TF and PF coils that are essential to reactor operation (in-vessel shielding) and (2) safeguard operating personnel and the public (ex-vessel shielding). For fission reactors and accelerators, radiation can be reduced by the disposition shielding around the reactor

Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are developing apace, with many potential ben-efits for economies, societies, communities, and individuals. Realising their potential requires achieving these benefits as widely as possible, as swiftly as possible, and with as smooth a transition as possible. Across sectors, AI technologies offer the promise of boosting productivity and creating new .