Solar Tower Power Plant With Thermal Storage

1y ago
12 Views
1 Downloads
1.85 MB
46 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Cannon Runnels
Transcription

2013MAE-598 Energy Systems DesignSOLAR TOWER POWER PLANTWITH THERMAL STORAGE

Solar Tower Power Plant with Thermal StorageQuality:Akshay BatraCaptain:Lalita NayagamEditor:Controller:Shubham Sharma Fraaz TahirSponsor: Dr. Steven TrimbleDate: 22nd, April, 20131

Declaration of ResponsibilityI hereby declare that I have contributed to and reviewed the contents of this final report andtake responsibility for the content herein.Lalita Nayagam22nd, April, 2013I hereby declare that I have contributed to and reviewed the contents of this final report andtake responsibility for the content herein.Akshay Batra22nd, April, 2013I hereby declare that I have contributed to and reviewed the contents of this final report andtake responsibility for the content herein.Fraaz Tahir22nd, April, 2013I hereby declare that I have contributed to and reviewed the contents of this final report andtake responsibility for the content herein.Shubham Sharma22nd, April, 2013

Table of ContentsDeclaration of Responsibility . 3Executive Summary. 71 Introduction: . 91.1 Design need: . 91.2 Problem Statement: . 91.3 Societal Impact: . 101.3.1 No greenhouse gases . 101.3.2 Saving eco-systems and livelihoods . 101.3.3: Depletion of Fossil Fuels . 101.3.4 Infinite Free Energy . 101.3.5 Solar jobs . 101.4 Report Organisation: . 111.5 Project Notebook: . 112. Final Preliminary Design Description: . 112.1 The technology at a glance . 112.2 Thermal Storage system . 142.2.1 Two tank direct system . 152.2.2 Two tank indirect system: . 152.2.3 Single-Tank Thermocline System . 162.2.4 Trade Studies . 172.3 Storage Salts . 182.3.1 Trade Study: . 182.4 Method of Operation: . 192.5 Key Features and benefits:. 192.6 Optimization Results: . 212.6.1 Optimization and Cost Results: . 252.7 Commercial Plan Summary: . 273. Design Process and Project Planning . 273.1 IPDS Design Process . 273.2 Project Plan . 283.2.1 Overview . 283.2.2 Key Issue. 324

3.2.3 Project Strategy Approach . 323.2.4 Risk Reduction Planning . 323.2.5 Schedule: . 323.2.6 Labour budget: . 333.2.7 Success Factors: . 344. Requirements and Constraints . 344.1 Voice of Customer:. 345. Conceptual design . 355.1 Functional Block Diagram . 355.2 Review of the Prior Art. 365.3 Trade Studies . 366. Preliminary design. 366.1 Configuration Block Diagram . 376.2 Analysis Plan and Results . 386.2.1 Reference Plant Description . 386.2.2 Thermodynamic Model . 396.2.4 Cost of Electricity (COE) . 416.2.5 Cost of electricity (COE) Optimization . 427. Project Performance . 437.1 Budgeting of Team Labour . 437.2 Gantt chart . 437.3 Key Lessons Learned . 439. Project Recommendations . 4510. References . .465

List of FiguresFig 1: Fundamental diagram of solar tower power plant .8Fig 2 Problem Statement 9Fig 3: Functional principle of a parabolic trough collector .12Fig 4: Functional principle of a Fresnel collector 12Fig 5: Functional principle of a solar tower .13Fig 6: Functional principle of a dish/Stirling system .13Fig 7: Two tank direct system .15Fig 8: Two tank indirect system .16Fig 9: Thermocline System .17Fig 10: The two-tank direct molten-salt thermal energy storage system at theSolar Two power plant 19Fig 11: Thermal Efficiency v/s Reheat Optimization .25Fig 12: Reheat v/s COE Optimization .26Fig 13: IPDS: .27Fig 14: Three phases of IPDS phase 28Fig 15: Work Breakdown Structure .29Fig 16 Thermodynamic Cycle without Reheat 30Fig 17 Thermodynamic Cycle with Reheat .31Fig 18 Gantt Chart 33Fig 19 Labor schedule .33Fig 20 Functional Block Diagram 35Fig 21: Schematic of the Solar Thermal Power Plant .37Fig 22: Storage System Management .38Fig 23: Cost Distribution of the plant Component wise .41List of Tables:Table 1: Weighted decision matrix for solar receptor .14Table 2: Thermal Storage system comparison 17Table 3: Thermal Storage salt comparison .18Table 4: Final key design parameters .20Table 5: State points without reheat 21Table 6: State points at reheat pressure at 40.4bar .23Table 7: State points at reheat pressure at 60.3bar .23Table 8: State points at reheat pressure at 80.2bar .24Table 9: State points at reheat pressure at 100.1bar 24Table 10: Reheat optimization .26Table 11: Requirements and validation matrix 34Table 12: Prior art 39Table 13: Cost breakdown .40Table 14: Cost optimization for reheat pressure .42Table 15: Final design specifications .446

Executive SummaryThe objective of this report is to fulfill the need for the preliminary design of a solar thermalpower plant with thermal storage and optimize it for lowest cost of electricity. The plant has arated output of 100MW and thermal storage of 4 hours. The plant is divided into three majorblocks: solar input, thermal storage and power block.The solar input block consists of heliostats and power tower. Heliostats concentrate the solarenergy on a receiver on top of a power tower. The thermal storage is a two tank direct storagesystem with molten salt as the heat transfer and storage fluid. The power block is athermodynamic Rankine cycle with a single stage of reheat.Sun rays are reflected by the heliostats and directed towards a receiver. The receiver containsa eutectic mixture of sodium and potassium nitrate which is heated up by the solarconcentration. Part of this molten salt goes to a storage tank while the rest passes through asteam generator where water is converted to steam. The steam drives a turbine to generateelectricity. The turbine outlet goes to a condenser which utilizes water from a lake. The wateris then pumped back to the steam generator, thus completing the cycle.The pre-concept phase started with need identification, solar technology research andselection of a reference plant. This was followed by the conceptual design phase. Afunctional block diagram was made according to the requirements. Trade studies wereperformed for different functional blocks. This led to selection of components for the plant.The thermodynamic cycle was optimized for highest efficiency and lowest cost of electricityby varying the reheat pressure. Cost model was made using the same methodology as thereference plant. This was done by expressing the component cost in terms of percentages ofthe capital investment. Inflation and contingency were also considered. Project managementtools like work breakdown structure, Gantt chart and labor schedule were used to plan andmonitor the progress of the project.The capital investment on this project is 830 million and the optimized cost of electricity is 0.169/kWh.7

Fig 1: Fundamental diagram of solar tower power plantReference: Gema Thermo-solar power plant, Seville, Spain8

1 Introduction:This MAE 598 energy systems design project conducted at Arizona State Universityaddresses the need for the preliminary design of a solar power plant with thermal storage. Theproject deliverables are 1) Final Report, 2) Final presentation, and 3) Project Notebook. Thesponsor of this project is Dr. Steven Trimble, instructor for this course. The project teamconsists of the following members: Lalita Nayagam, Fraaz Tahir, Akshay Batra, andShubham Sharma. The project period is January 07, 2013 to April 24, 2013.1.1 Design need:Customer requires a solar power plant with thermal storage for four hours; generating100MW guaranteed output. The plant is to be optimized for lowest cost of electricity.1.2 Problem Statement:The goal of the project is to complete the preliminary design of a solar power plant basedon idealized solar input and guaranteed electric power output profiles as given in figure 2.The effect of clouds, wind and other weather effects will not be considered. The ultimateheat sink is a large lake with a constant temperature of 80 degrees Fahrenheit. The ambienttemperature and relative humidity will be assumed to be constant at 70 degrees Fahrenheitand 10% respectively.Maximum Solar Insolation1000 W/sq mGuaranteedOutput 100 MWeMidnight6 pmNoon6 amMidnightFigure 2 Problem Statement9

In the preliminary design will select the thermal storage material and the operating statepoints (temperature, pressure, flow) for each major component. The power block will bedefined to the major component level. A Cost of Electricity performance model will beprepared and used to optimize the plant for the lowest COE.1.3 Societal Impact:Societal impacts are very important part and hence are considered in this project report. Hereare some impacts listed below which are significant.1.3.1 No greenhouse gasesThe foremost advantage of solar energy is that it does not emit any greenhouse gases.Solar energy is produced by using radiations from sun – a process void of any smoke,gas, or other chemical by-product. This is the main driving force behind green energytechnologies, as nations attempt to meet climate change obligations in curbingemissions1.3.2 Saving eco-systems and livelihoodsBecause solar does not rely on constantly mining raw materials, it doesn’t result in thedestruction of forests and eco-systems that occurs with most fossil fuel operations.Destruction can come in many forms, from destruction through accepted extractionmethods, to more irresponsible practices in vulnerable areas, to accidents1.3.3: Depletion of Fossil FuelsThe fossil fuels cannot remain the dominant source of energy forever. Whatever theprecise timetable is for the depletion, oil and gas supplies will not keep up withgrowing energy demands.1.3.4 Infinite Free EnergyAnother advantage of using solar energy is that beyond initial installation andmaintenance, solar energy is one hundred percent free. Solar doesn’t requireexpensive and on-going raw materials like oil or coal, and requires significantly loweroperational labour than conventional power production.1.3.5 Solar jobsA particularly relevant and advantageous feature of solar energy production is that itcreates jobs. Solar jobs come in many forms, from manufacturing, installing,monitoring and maintaining solar panels, to research and design, development,cultural integration, and policy jobs. With solar energy currently contributing only anestimated 4% of the world’s electricity and an economic-model where raw materialsdon’t have to be indefinitely purchased and transported, it’s reasonable to assumesolar jobs are sustainable.10

1.4 Report Organisation:The report is divided into eight sections. Section 1 discusses the societal need, the projectproblem statement and project scope. Section 2 presents the final preliminary design thatmeets the problem statement. Section 3 discusses how the team planned the project. Section 4explains how the design requirements were developed. Section 4 and 5 present the conceptualand preliminary design efforts, respectively. Section 6 summarises how effective was theteam in following the project plan in terms of schedule, labour budget, material budget,meeting requirements and mitigating risks. Section 7 discusses the project conclusions andsection 8 provides go forward recommendations. Following section are Appendices.1.5 Project Notebook:The team organises all its work into a team Project Notebook that is used throughout theproject to document the work. The notebook contains detailed descriptions of all the tradestudies, analyses, tests and team discussions. The final report is written as a comprehensive,stand-alone document. However, it refers to the notebook as needed to direct the reader tomore detailed information regarding the design.2. Final Preliminary Design Description:This section describes the final design that meets the customer’s need. The remainingsections of this report explain the design process that resulted in this final preliminary design.2.1 The technology at a glance [2]:The first stage in our project was to understand the basic principle of solar thermal powerplants which use the concentrating reflector systems in large-scale versions also known assolar fields. The solar fields direct the solar radiation onto a receiver. The concentratedradiation is then transformed into thermal energy at temperatures ranging from around 200 toover 1,000 degrees (depending on the system). As in a conventional power plant, this thermalenergy can then be converted into electricity via steam or gas-powered turbines, or it can alsobe used for other industrial processes such as water desalination, cooling or, in the nearfuture, the production of hydrogen.Due to this principle, solar thermal power plants excel in their ability to store the thermalenergy generated in a relatively simple and cost-effective manner, allowing them to generateelectricity even during hours of darkness. Consequently, they can make a key contribution toplanned, demand-oriented electricity production.There are four different configurations of concentrating reflector systems: linearconcentrating systems, such as parabolic trough and Fresnel collectors, and point focusconcentrating systems, such as solar towers and dishes.11

Fig 3: Functional principle of a parabolic trough collectorAll systems must track the sun in order to be able to concentrate the direct radiation. Thesolar field of a parabolic trough power plant (Fig. 3) consists of numerous parallel rows ofcollectors which are made of parabolic reflectors. These concentrate the sunlight onto anabsorber tube that runs along the focal line, generating temperatures of approximately 400 C.Circulating thermo-oil serves as a heat transfer medium to conduct the thermal energy to aheat exchanger, where water vapour is generated with a temperature of around 390 C. Thisis then used to power a steam turbine and generator, the same as in conventional powerplants.Fig 4: Functional principle of a Fresnel collector12

In concentrated solar tower power plants (Fig. 5), solar radiation is concentrated onto acentral absorber at the top of the tower by hundreds of automatically positioned reflectors.The significantly higher concentration in comparison to parabolic trough collectors, forexample, allows higher temperatures in excess of 1,000 C to be achieved. This enablesgreater efficiency, particularly when using gas-powered turbines, thereby resulting in lowerelectricity costs.Fig 5: Functional principle of a solar tower.Dish/Stirling systems (Fig. 6) comprise of parabolic reflector mirrors (dish) that concentratesthe solar radiation onto the receiver of a connected Stirling engine. The engine then convertsthe thermal energy directly into mechanical work or electricity. These systems can achieve adegree of efficiency in excess of 30 per cent. Although these systems are suitable for standalone operation, they also offer the possibility of interconnecting several individual systemsto create a solar farm, thus meeting an electricity demand from 10 kW to several MW.Fig 6: Functional principle of a dish/Stirling system.13

Table 1 shows the weighted decision matrix study of the various solar collectors and explainsthe reason for selection of Heliostat field collectors.Table 1: Weighted decision matrix for selecting the solar receptors [4]AlternativesEvaluation sLinearFresnelCollectorsHeliostat FieldCollectorsInitial Cost0.303788O&M Cost0.203799Collector Efficiency 0.158658Thermal Efficiency0.158638Area Covered0.108568Effective Tracking0.108775Total Score5.506.56.77.90The weighing factors are based on the importance of the mentioned characteristics. Initialcost is given the maximum weightage as cost is the driving factor in any decision makingprocess. Efficiency of collector and thermal efficiency were also considered. Based on thedata in the table it can be concluded that heliostat collector field is the best alternative.2.2 Thermal Storage system [3]:Thermal energy storage comprises a number of technologies that store thermalenergy in energy storage reservoirs for later use. They can be employed to balance energydemand between day time and night time. The thermal reservoir may be maintained at atemperature above (hotter) or below (colder) that of the ambient environment. Thermalenergy is often accumulated from active solar collector and transferred to insulate repositoriesfor use later. The applications today include the production of ice, chilled water, or eutecticsolution at night, or hot water which is then used to cool / heat environments during the day.14

2.2.1 Two tank direct system:Fig 7: Two tank direct system(Ref: www.eere.energy.gov/basics/renewable energy/thermal storage.html)Solar thermal energy in this system is stored in the same fluid used to collect it. The fluid isstored in two tanks—one at high temperature and the other at low temperature. Fluid from thelow-temperature tank flows through the solar collector or receiver, where solar energy heats itto a high temperature and it then flows to the high-temperature tank for storage. Fluid fromthe high-temperature tank flows through a heat exchanger, where it generates steam forelectricity production. The fluid exits the heat exchanger at a low temperature and returns tothe low-temperature tank.Two-tank direct storage was used in early parabolic trough power plants (such as SolarElectric Generating Station I) and at the Solar Two power tower in California. The troughplants used mineral oil as the heat-transfer and storage fluid; Solar Two used molten salt.2.2.2 Two tank indirect system:Two-tank indirect systems function in the same way as two-tank direct systems,except different fluids are used as the heat-transfer and storage fluids. This system isused in plants in which the heat-transfer fluid is too expensive or not suited for use asthe storage fluid. The storage fluid from the low-temperature tank flows through anextra heat exchanger, where it is heated by the high-temperature heat-transfer fluid.The high-temperature storage fluid then flows back to the high-temperature storagetank. The fluid exits this heat exchanger at a low temperature and returns to the solar15

collector or receiver, where it is heated back to a high temperature. Storage fluid fromthe high-temperature tank is used to generate steam in the same manner as the twotank direct system. The indirect system requires an extra heat exchanger, which addscost to the system.Fig 8: Two tank indirect system(Ref: North American Renewable Energy Directory)This system will be used in many of the parabolic power plants in Spain and has alsobeen proposed for several U.S. parabolic plants. The plants will use organic oil as theheat-transfer fluid and molten salt as the storage fluid.2.2.3 Single-Tank Thermocline System:Single-tank thermocline systems store thermal energy in a solid medium—mostcommonly, silica sand—located in a single tank. At any time during operation, aportion of the medium is at high temperature, and a portion is at low temperature. Thehot- and cold-temperature regions are separated by a temperature gradientor thermocline. High-temperature heat-transfer fluid flows into the top of thethermocline and exits the bottom at low temperature. This process moves thethermocline downward and adds thermal energy to the system for storage. Reversingthe flow moves the thermocline upward and removes thermal energy from the systemto generate steam and electricity. Buoyancy effects create thermal stratification of thefluid within the tank, which helps to stabilize and maintain the thermocline. Using asolid storage medium and only needing one tank reduces the cost of this systemrelative to two-tank systems. This system was demonstrated at the Solar One powertower, where steam was used as the heat-transfer fluid and mineral oil was used as thestorage fluid. Fig. 9 explains the working setup of the thermocline storage system.16

Fig 9: Thermocline System(Ref: North American Renewable Energy Directory)2.2.4 Trade Studies:Table 2: Thermal storage system comparison [3]Attributes /OptionsDirect 2 tank systemIndirect 2 Tank SystemThermoclineCapital Cost- Operating temp.- Maintenance- Heat losses-- Volume of the fluid-- Operation cost-- The Result-60 6The driving factor in the selection of the storage system is the cost and the operatingtemperatures of salts. Based on the trade studies we have used the Two Tank DirectThermal storage for our plant.17

2.3 Storage Salts [3]:Molten salt can be employed as a thermal energy storage method to retain thermal energycollected by a solar tower or solar trough so that it can be used to generate electricity in badweather or at night. The molten salt mixtures vary. The most extended mixturecontains sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate and calcium nitrate. It is non-flammable andnontoxic, and has already been used in the chemical and metals industries as a heat-transportfluid, so experience with such systems exists in non-solar applications. Molten salts areabundant and not very costly. They behave themselves that is they are neither decomposingnor volatizing at the high temperature needed in a CSP plant — about 565 degrees Celsius( C). . At room temperature, the salts look like powdery white table salt. At the highertemperatures in a CSP plant, the salts look like water.The molten salts used for storage are a mix of calcium, sodium nitrate and potassium nitrate.Sodium nitrate is mined from dry lake beds in Chile, in surroundings similar to the Utah saltflats. Potassium nitrate also occurs in nature and is mined in Chile, Ethiopia, and elsewhere.Most salt melts at 131 C (268 F). It is kept liquid at 288 C (550 F) in an insulated "cold"storage tank. The liquid salt is pumped through panels in a solar collector where the focusedsun heats it to 566 C (1,051 F). It is then sent to a hot storage tank. When electricity isneeded, the hot salt is pumped to a conventional steam-generator to produce superheatedsteam for a turbine/generator as used in any conventional coal, oil or nuclear power plant.2.3.1 Trade Study:A comparative trade study was performed to select the most suitable salt compositionfor our system. Table 3 Show the parameters used for trade studies were cost andcoefficient of heat transfer. Based on the comparative analysis, solar salt has beenselected as a thermal storage medium for our system.Table 3: Thermal storage salts comparison [3]SaltsDensityCpCost,(kg/m³) (J/Kg K) /Kg /kWhHitec XL (42:15:43 Ca:Na:K Nitrate)199214471.4318.2Hitec (7: 53 Na:K nitrate)208315610.9310.7Solar Salt (60:40: Na:K nitrate)187016000.495.8Calcium Nitrate (42:15:43 Ca:Na:K Nitrate)140025001.1920.1Therminol VP-1 (Diphenyl biphenyle oxide)815231910057.518

2.4 Method of Operation:In a solar power plant with thermal storage, salts are stored in two tanks and are pumped fromthe "cold" tank to the power tower, where it collects the solar energy that is focused on thereceiver, raising its average temperature to 575 C. The salts then descend into the "hot" tank,where they can maintain this very hot temperature for fourteen hours. The salt in the hot tankis then sent to a heat exchanger that generates the steam at 500 C needed to turn the turbinesat a power plant

1.3.5 Solar jobs A particularly relevant and advantageous feature of solar energy production is that it creates jobs. Solar jobs come in many forms, from manufacturing, installing, monitoring and maintaining solar panels, to research and design, development, cultural integration, and policy jobs.

Related Documents:

Cooling Tower Marley MD Cooling Tower Marley NC alpha SPLASH-FILL COOLING TOWER Marley MD 5000 COUNTERFLOW COOLING TOWER Marley AV Cooling Tower Marley AV CROSSFLOW COOLING TOWER ADDITIONAL NC COOLING TOWER PuBLICATIONS For further information about the NC Cooling Tower – including eng

Rohn 25G Guyed Tower 44 Rohn 45G Guyed Tower 46 Rohn 55G Guyed Tower 48 Rohn SSV Towers 49 Sabre 1200 TLWD Guyed Tower 50 Sabre 1800 TLWD Guyed Tower 52 Sabre 1800 SRWD Guyed Tower 54 Sabre Series UL Self-Supporting Tower 55 Sabre Series VL Self-Supporting Tower 55 Lightweight Towe

2. Diesel Power Plant 3. Nuclear Power Plant 4. Hydel Power Plant 5. Steam Power Plant 6. Gas Power Plant 7. Wind Power Plant 8. Geo Thermal 9. Bio - Gas 10. M.H.D. Power Plant 2. What are the flow circuits of a thermal Power Plant? 1. Coal and ash circuits. 2. Air and Gas 3. Feed water and steam 4. Cooling and water circuits 3.

SOLAR POWER PLANT 1.1 General Scope of Work for Solar Power Plant. 1.1.1 The general scope of work involves Engineering, Procurement and Construction (EPC) of the grid-connected solar photovoltaic power plant with Plant Capacity of 1MW. 1.1.2 The scope of work includes commissioning of the power plant. The Contractor shall

Solar Milellennium, Solar I 500 I CEC/BLM LLC Trough 3 I Ridgecrest Solar Power Project BLM 250 CEC/BLM 'C·' ' Solar 250 CEO NextEra I Trough -----Abengoa Solar, Inc. I Solar I 250 I CEC Trough -I, II, IV, VIII BLM lvanpah SEGS Solar I 400 I CECJBLM Towe'r ico Solar (Solar 1) BLM Solar I

Mohave/Harper Lake Solar Abengoa Solar Inc, LADWP San Bernardino County 250 MW Solar Trough Project Genesis NextEra Energy Riverside County 250 MW Solar Trough Beacon Solar Energy Project Beacon Solar LLC Kern County 250 MW Solar Trough Solar Millennium Ridgecrest Solar Millenn

makes the concentrated solar energy usable. When ex-posed to solar radiation, the medium heats up inside the absorber tube or solar tower and can subsequently trans-fer the heat energy it has collected to a storage system or through a heat exchanger to the power plant block. Power plant block In the power plant block, the hot heating medium is pum-

EZ Tower Owner's Manual Document: 3-CMLT-1027-01 Revision: A. 4 EZ Tower TM Owner's Manual, Rev A IMPORTANT SAFETY INSTRUCTIONS READ THESE INSTRUCTIONS IN THEIR ENTIRETY BEFORE INSTALLING YOUR TOWER. 1) . DO NOT climb the tower. Tower climbing is very dangerous. 7)Locate the tower mounting mast well away from occupied buildings .