The RITA-T (Rapid Interactive (Screening) Test For Autism In Toddlers .

1y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
1.76 MB
38 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Ciara Libby
Transcription

The RITA-T (Rapid Interactive (Screening) Test for Autism inToddlers:A New Level 2 Autism Screening ToolRoula Choueiri, MDAssociate Professor of Pediatrics, UMMSChief, Developmental and Behavioral PediatricsUMass Memorial Children’s Medical Center

RITA-T OVERVIEW Interactive Play-based Autism Screening Tool Currently validated for toddlers 18-36 months Can be administered by Clinicians, Nurses, Early Intervention & EarlyChildhood Educators Assesses developmental constructs delayed in early ASD such as: JointAttention (JA); Reaction to Emotions; Awareness of Human Agency Administration and scoring time is within 10 minutes Consists in 9-interactive play-settings Toddlers reaction to examiner’s “presses” are scored on an ordinal scale oftypical to atypical (0-2,3, or 4) and total score generated. Training to Reliability achieved in 3 hours The RITA-T is language-free; only language is “Look” with a point gesture. Goal is to have the RITA-T and its training available in the Public Domain @Tufts @UmassMedicalSchool http://www.umassmed.edu/autismrita-t/rita-t/

Current Screening Methods for ASD Level 1- Universal Screen Autism screen recommended by American Academy ofPediatrics at 18 and 24 mos. Example: MCHAT R/F– Low Positive Predictive Value (PPV) for ASD (0.54)– High PPV for Developmental Delay (0.98) Over-referral for ASD evaluations Longer wait delaying those who really need diagnosis

Current Screening Methods for ASD Level 2 – Disorder-specific screener Differentiates between ASD and other delays Referrals for ASD evaluations more appropriate Interactive Level 2 ASD screeners preferred Triggers atypical behaviors

Two-Level ASD ScreeningRisk ASD Level 2Risk for DevelopmentalDelays/ASDLevel 1Well Child Visits or high risk (EarlyIntervention)

Ideal ASD Level 2 screenerThis model would allowimproved access and twodifferent clinical pathwaysReliable in 18-36 monthsEasy to train and learnToddlers with high risk ofASD would not be delayedfor diagnostic confirmationDiscriminates wellbetween toddlers withASD and those with Delaysthat are non ASDEarly Intervention, EarlyChildhood educators canthen do MCHAT R/F andRITA-TAnd most importantly:FITS WELL INTO BUSYPRACTICE FLOW

CurrentSTAT: 20 minutes to administer and score At cut off score of 2: Psychometrics better in 2-3 y than in 2y Can miss ASD vs. Autism Expensive 500

DESCRIPTION of the RITA-T

Description of the RITA-T(Journal of Pediatrics, August 2015) 9 interactive presses Assesses developmentalconstructs delayed in earlyASD such as: Joint Attention (JA) Reaction to Emotions Awareness of HumanAgency Each item coded from0 to 2, 3 or 4(typical to atypical) Total score generated;maximum: 30 The lower the score, themore typical the reaction Administration and scoring time: 10 minutes

The RITA-T re*A-Blockedexploration of atoy (TL:11s)SA; JA; HAToy phoneChild explores toy. Examiner blocks it, 3 times.Observe EC and latency to EC for 11 s.0-4 for EC; time to EC; orgiving upB-Object TeaseSA; JA; HAToy Phone*C-BlockedVision(TL: 11 s)D-Magic BallSA; JA; HAToyOpaque screen0-2 for EC to parent,examiner or both0-3 for EC; Time to ECCogJA“Magic” cup &ballE-ColorConstancyCogJA“Magic” scarfF-*Object vs.FaceSAPictures of train &babyExaminer pretends to give toy to child then pullsback, 3 times. Observe EC to examiner or parent.Child explores toy; examiner blocks toy frombehind the child using a screen for 11s. ObserveEC, JA.Ball in magic cup shown to child then examinermakes it disappear, 3 times. Observe surprise; JAto examiner & parent.Examiner shows double-sided magic scarf on oneside initially then examiner changes colorabruptly. Observe surprise; JA to examiner orparent.A foam circle with pictures of a baby and of a trainon either side is presented to the child 5s eachside. Observe picture preference for 5s.JACeiling lightSACaregiverCogSRMarker MirrorA red dot is marked on forehead with removablenon-allergenic marker. Examiner holds smallmirror to child. Observe reaction to recognizingdot and taking it away.0-2 for recognizes the reddot; attempts to removeit(TL:15s)G -Rapid JAH*-Sad Face,Still Face(TL:10s each)I-Recognition0-3 for reaction ofsurprise; EC to parentand/or examiner0-2 for reaction ofsurprise; JA to parent orexaminer0-2 forpreference to baby (0),train pictures (1), or nointerest at all (2)Examiner calls child suddenly and points at ceiling 0-1 for JAlight. Observe JA.Caregiver is asked to pretend to cry: Observe:0-4 each: 0-1 scoredistress, EC, proximity seeking or no interest forprovided to each10s. Then caregiver is asked to have a neutralreaction observed.expression; Observe same for 10s.

The RITA-T Scoring Sheet

Eye Contact and JA“Checking in” to share interest/surprise to a magicalchange in colors or to disappearing ball

Human Agency & Social AwarenessChild aware of person blockingobject not just “the hand”Child aware of others 'emotionsand reacts

Videos of the RITA-T

VALIDATION1- Develop a Replicable Training Module and Establish ScoringReliability2- Establish Criterion-Related Validity with other ASD Measures,e.g., the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)3-Generalize the RITA-T to other clinic populations and to otherDevelopmental Evaluation Centers and study psychometrics andeffect on wait times4-Test new models of early screening for ASD with EarlyIntervention and Early Education Centers to improve earlyidentification

Validation - Reliability Training Scoring algorithm, Manual and training developed and tested.Training consists of: Observation & Scoring of videos of RITA-T administration Group discussion of scoring Scoring of videos independently Inter-Rater Reliability (IRR) calculation Initial and subsequent trainings: IRR: Kappa 0.8-1.0 (very good to excellent)Current training module : Two sessions of 90 minutes each

Initial validation Sample(J of Pediatrics, 2015) 74 toddlers were enrolled 13 were excluded»61 continued the study 23 had ASD 19 had DD (Developmental Delay)/NonASD diagnoses Language Delay (LD) in 12 Global Developmental Delay (GDD) in 7 19 were “TD” (NCR: No Concerns Raised)

Results- DemographicsFemale N (%)Age monthsMean (SD)Race N (%)White N (%)HispanicOtherIncome N (%) 50,000 50,000ASD(N 23)NonASD(N 19)NCR(N 19)P-value1 (4)27.77 (5.7)8 (36)29.46 (6)12 (63)21.7 (6.5) 0.0010.0010.0711 (47.8)8 (34.7)4(17.3)15 (79)3 (15.8)1(5.2)8 (42.1)4 (21)7(36.8)NS7 (30.4)16 (69.5)8 (42.1)11 (58)6 (31.5)13 (68.4)P-values for group differences are based on ANOVA for continuous variablesand chi-square tests for categorical variables.

Results- Mean Scores (SD) by DiagnosesASD20.8 (3.6)DD/NON-ASD13 (2.5)NCR10.9 (2.12)P-VALUE 0.0001RITA-TM-CHATTotal Items failed (SD)M-CHATMean critical failed (SD)DSM IVDSM 58.7 (4.9)4 (3.6)1.3(1.6) 0.00012.87 (2.3)8.96 (1.99)6.04 (0.88)1.42 (1.6)0.89 (1.15)0.75 (1.15)0.11 (0.31)N/AN/A 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001MULLEN Receptive Language29.7 (12.3)33.8 (15.2)N/ANSMULLEN Expressive Language28.4 (13.2)29.6 (13.4)N/ANSMULLEN Visual Reception32.8 (10.7)40 (14.65)N/ANS

Results- Correlations of RITA-T with Autism measuresCorrelationsDSM IV criteria DSM5 criteriacheckedcheckedADOSComposite Scorer 0.780.760.79N 424225t 7.817.376.14p (two-tailed) 0.0001 0.0001 0.0001

Sensitivity & Specificity for all cut-off scoresRITA-T Total 0.560.540.490.480.460.45

ROC CURVE

Current Validation StudiesGeneralization & New models

Testing the two-level ASD screening model Aim 1Study the RITA-T in a 2 level screening model to improve earlyidentification (in specialized clinics; in Early Intervention) Aim 2Apply RITA-T psychometrics to a different population andgeneralize/refine findings24

a- Collaboration with Alberta Children’s Hospital Division of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics (JeanFrancois Lemay, MD FRCPC; two speech therapists, psychologist) Goal: Reduce patient wait-list time for toddlers 18- 39 monthsreferred for diagnostic evaluations for possible ASD October, 2013: wait to be evaluated was 12 months New model and triage with RITA-T: Parent meeting; MCHAT &RITA-T administration then triage to specific testing group

Triage Groups Based on RITA–T ScoreLow Risk :score under 12Vineland; DSM5Medium Risk:score is between 12-16Vineland; ADOS2; DSM5High Risk:score above 16Vineland; DSM5

Results 173 toddlers testedRITA-T average administration time: 9 minutesNew model improved wait time and patient flowPreliminary results– Consistent– Cannot be shared yet publicly

Results of New Triage ProtocolDATENUMBER oftoddlersWAIT TIME TO DIAGNOSTIC VISITOCT, 201310412-13 MONTHSMAY, 2014296 MONTHSSEPT, 2014112 MONTHSJAN, 201628 days

b- Studies ongoing at UMass in Worcester(Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics- DBP)

a- Testing model with Early InterventionThe THOM Early Intervention program in Worcester:- EI providers all trained on the MCHAT-R/F- Three EI providers from Autism team trained reliably onthe RITA-T- Pediatric clinics (UMass; Child Health) informed aboutstudy. MCHAT R/F completed by pediatricians.- All toddlers enrolled in EI program receive MCHAT-R/F- Those with concerns on MCHAT R/F or concerns clinicallyare administered the RITA-T- They are then referred to diagnostic team in DBP atUMass in Worcester30

DBP UMass Worcester Diagnostic Team and TestingDiagnostic evaluation team at UMass:- The Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS)-2- The Mullen Scales of Early Learning- Diagnoses discussed with families- Study approved by IRB

b- Collecting further validation data ALL Referrals to DBP for ages 0-3 (from community; families;other EI programs)–––––Evaluated by DBP directlyEvaluated part of clinical project:Toddler receives MCHAT R/F; RITA-T; ADOS 2; MSELDiagnoses discussedStudy approved by IRB

c- Results Wait time from EI study program: within 1 month Wait time from community: 1-3 months Currently 77 toddlers enrolled so far (as of April 22, 2016) Study ongoing; stay tuned for results

SUMMARY: The RITA-T Correlates well with Autism diagnostic measures Reliable training is easily obtained Discriminates well between toddlers with DD/NonASD & ASD At 5-10 minutes, it fits very well into clinic flow The RITA-T is a reliable and reasonably valid Level 2interactive ASD screening test for toddlers Facilitates earlier detection and two-level screening models

Future steps Continuing to collect data ; results available summer 2016 Website, training tapes and CME in progress; summer 2016 Test will be available in public domain at low costs Website: http://www.umassmed.edu/AutismRITA-T/ For information or questions: Roula.choueiri@umassmemorial.org

AcknowledgementsResearch Team Sheldon Wagner, PhD Tufts Tool development consultant:Susan Parsons, MDTufts CCSN Zero to ThreeKaren Miller, MD; Nicola Smith, MD;Kathleen Reilly, CCC-SLP; KrishnaBanerjee, MD; Sheryl Levy, MD;Naomi Steiner, MD; Christina Sakai,MD; Carmina Erdei, MD; SusanMangan, MS; Eric Stern, BS; LaurenBrodsky, MSCalgary team: Jean Francois Lemay, MD: Co-PIUMass team Roksana Sasanfar, MD Martha Castro; Margaret Manning,PhD Worcester Thom Early InterventionprogramGrants1- Planning Grant Tufts Clinical andTranslational Science Institute (CTSI)20102- CVS charitable trademark (Autismoutcome research project)– 2009-20103-Susan Saltonstall Pilot Grant 20124- UMass Pediatric Department Seedgrant

Thank youThe families who participated

the RITA-T - Pediatric clinics (UMass; Child Health) informed about study. MCHAT R/F completed by pediatricians. - All toddlers enrolled in EI program receive MCHAT-R/F - Those with concerns on MCHAT R/F or concerns clinically are administered the RITA-T - They are then referred to diagnostic team in DBP at UMass in Worcester 30

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

argue and Rita admits that she told a friend about the affair, who has gossiped about it to others. Sue's parents, Michelle, Bob, Rita and Sue have a confrontation outside Rita's house. Ultimately, Sue's parents and Michelle blame Rita for what had happened. The argument ends with Michelle leaving Bob. Some weeks later, Sue meets Rita for .

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.