10/12/2020 Midterm Evaluation Of Light-Duty Vehicle .

2y ago
11 Views
3 Downloads
362.98 KB
13 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Adele Mcdaniel
Transcription

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission An official website of the United States government.We've made some changes to EPA.gov. If the information you arelooking for is not here, you may be able to find it on the EPA WebArchive or the January 19, 2017 Web Snapshot.CloseMidterm Evaluation of Light-Duty VehicleGreenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for ModelYears 2022-2025Related TopicsRegulations for GHG emissions from passenger cars & trucksFuel EconomyLight-duty models for GHG emissionsYou will need Free Viewers and Adobe Reader to view some of the fileson this page. See EPA’s About PDF page to learn more.On this page:OverviewMid-term Evaluation Final DeterminationMid-term Evaluation ProcessPrevious StepsProposed DeterminationDraft Technical Assessment ReportEPA Technical Projects to Inform the Midterm EvaluationEPA Publications Informing the Midterm EvaluationEPA Presentations Regarding the Midterm light-duty-vehicle-greenhouse-gas1/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission As part of the 2012 rulemaking establishing the model year (MY) 2017-2025light-duty vehicle greenhouse gas (GHG) standards, EPA made a regulatorycommitment to conduct a Midterm Evaluation (MTE) of the standards for MY2022-2025. As a part of this process, EPA examed a wide range of factors, such asdevelopments in powertrain technology, vehicle electrification, light-weightingand vehicle safety impacts, the penetration of fuel efficient technologies in themarketplace, consumer acceptance of fuel efficient technologies, trends in fuelprices and the vehicle fleet, employment impacts, and many others.EPA’s regulations require several formal steps in the MTE process, includingopportunities for public input.Step 1: Draft Technical Assessment Report (TAR) issued jointly with theNational Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and theCalifornia Air Resources Board (CARB) with opportunity for publiccomment. (July 2016)Step 2: The Former EPA Administrator made a Proposed Determinationwith opportunity for public comment. (November 2016) (This step wasreevaluated under the direction of former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt)Step 3: The EPA Administrator must make a final determination withregard to whether the standards remain appropriate or should be changed byApril 1, 2018.Mid-term Evaluation Final DeterminationOn April 2, 2018, the Administrator signed the Mid-term Evaluation FinalDetermination which finds that the model year 2022-2025 greenhouse gasstandards are not appropriate in light of the record before EPA and, therefore,should be revised. The Federal Register Notice announcing the Administrator’sdecision is available for review below.Federal Register Notice: Mid-term Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsStandards for Model Year 2022-2025 Light-duty Vehicles (PDF)(11 pp, 634 K, published April 13, 2018, About PDF)The Mid-term Evaluation ProcessReconsideration of the Midterm Evaluation Final DeterminationOn March 15, 2017, former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt and Department ofTransportation Secretary Elaine Chao announced that EPA intended to reconsiderthe final determination, issued on January 12, 2017, that recommended no changeto the greenhouse gas standards for light duty vehicles for model years 20222025. EPA announced it woud reconsider that determination in coordination ty-vehicle-greenhouse-gas2/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission The Mid-term Evaluation process was established as a part of the 2012 finalGHG emissions standards for model years 2017-2025, requiring EPA to determineno later than April 1, 2018, whether the standards for model years 2022-2025established are appropriate. In accord with this schedule, EPA announced thatit intended to make a new Final Determination regarding the appropriateness ofthe standards no later than April 1, 2018.Federal Register Notice: Notice of Intention to Reconsider the FinalDetermination of the Mid-Term Evaluation of Greenhouse Gas EmissionsStandards for Model Year 2022-2025 Light Duty Vehicles(PDF) ( 2 pp, 185 K, published March 22, 2017 )Alliance of Auto Manufacturers Letter to former Administrator PruittEXITEPA provided opportunities for the public to comment on itsreconsideration of the previous Mid-term Evaluation determination, with apublic comment period that closed on October 5, 2017 and a public hearingheld on September 6, 2017 in Washington DC. Comments and the hearingtranscripts are available at www.regulations.gov in public docket EPA-HQOAR-2015-0827.Previous Steps in the Midterm Evaluation ProcessOn January 12, 2017, Administrator Gina McCarthy signed her determination tomaintain the current GHG emissions standards for model year (MY) 2022-2025vehicles. Her final determination found that automakers are well positioned tomeet the standards at lower costs than previously estimated.Highlights of Administrator McCarthy's January 2017 Final DeterminationAutomakers have a wide range of technology pathways available to meetthe MY2022-2025 standards, at slightly lower per-vehicle costs thanpreviously predicted. The standards are achievable with very lowpenetration of strong hybrids, electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electricvehicles, consistent with the findings of a comprehensive 2015 NationalAcademy of Sciences study.The standards will save consumers money, significantly reduce GHGemissions and fuel consumption, and provide benefits to the health andwelfare of Americans.Automakers have outperformed the standards for the first four years of theprogram (MY2012-2015) and manufacturers are adopting fuel efficienttechnologies at unprecedented rates, all while vehicle sales have increasedfor 7 consecutive years.Administrator McCarty's determination was based on an extensive technicalrecord, created over 8 years of research, review of several hundred publishedreports, hundreds of stakeholder meetings, and multiple opportunities for thepublic to provide input. This Final Determination follows the November 2016release of EPA’s Proposed Determination and the July 2016 release of a DraftTechnical Assessment Report (TAR), issued jointly by the EPA, the -vehicle-greenhouse-gas3/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and the California AirResources Board (CARB). EPA provided opportunities for public comment forboth the Draft TAR and the Proposed Determination.Cover Letter -- EPA Administrator’s signed Cover Letter to the FinalDetermination.Final Determination Document -- Final Determination on the Appropriateness ofthe Model Year 2022-2025 Light-duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas EmissionsStandards under the Midterm Evaluation(PDF) (33 pp, 560 K, January 2017, EPA-420-R-17-001).Response to Comments Document -- Final Determination on the Appropriatenessof the Model Year 2022-2025 Light-duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas EmissionsStandards under the Midterm Evaluation: Response to Comments(PDF) (174 pp, 1.58 MB, January 2017, EPA-420-R-17-002).Proposed DeterminationOn November 30, 2016, Administrator McCarthy proposed to determine that theMY 2022-2025 standards remain appropriate and that a rulemaking to changethem is not warranted. This proposed determination was based on the robusttechnical record including the draft TAR, input from the auto industry and otherstakeholders, and updated analyses. The public comment period for this proposeddetermination ended on December 30, 2016.Highlights of the Proposed DeterminationAuto manufacturers can meet the MY 2022-2025 standards at slightly lowerper-vehicle costs than predicted in the TAR, and lower costs than predictedin the 2012 rulemaking that established the standards.The current standards will save consumers money and provide benefits tothe health and welfare of Americans.Automakers have a wide range of technology pathways available to meetthe standards. Standards are achievable with very low penetration of stronghybrids, electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. This findingis consistent with the conclusions the National Academy of Sciences foundin a comprehensive 2015 study.Automakers have outperformed the standards for the first four years of theprogram (MY2012-2015) and manufacturers are adopting fuel efficienttechnologies at unprecedented rates, all while vehicle sales have increasedfor 6 consecutive years. There are over 100 car, SUV, and pickup versionson the market today that already meet 2020 or later standards.Cover Letter –- EPA Administrator’s signed Cover Letter to the ProposedDetermination.Proposed Determination Document -- Proposed Determination on theAppropriateness of the Model Year 2022-2025 Light-duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas Emissions Standards under the Midterm Evaluation hicle-greenhouse-gas4/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission (268 pp, 6.38 MB, EPA-420-R-16-020, November 2016)Technical Support Document to the Proposed Determination -- ProposedDetermination on the Appropriateness of the Model Year 2022-2025 Light-dutyVehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards under the Midterm Evaluation:Technical Support Document(PDF) (719 pp, 18 MB, EPA-420-R-16-021, November 2016)Notice of Availability of a Proposed Order: Proposed Determination on theAppropriateness of the Model Year 2022-2025 Light-duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas Emissions Standards under the Midterm Evaluation(PDF) (2 pp, 199 K, published December 6, 2016)For additional documents supporting EPA’s analyses for the ProposedDetermination, see the Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis(ALPHA) Tool and the Optimization Model for reducing Emissions ofGreenhouse gases from Automobiles (OMEGA) pages.Draft Technical Assessment Report (TAR)EPA, NHTSA, and CARB jointly issued a Draft TAR for public comment in July2016. The Draft TAR was a technical report, not a decision document, andexamined a wide range of issues relevant to the 2022-2025 standards.Highlights of the Draft Technical Assessment Report:Automakers are innovating in a time of record sales and fuel economylevels. The results of the Draft TAR show that manufacturers are adoptingfuel economy technologies at unprecedented rates. Car makers andsuppliers have developed far more innovative technologies to improve fueleconomy and reduce GHG emissions than anticipated just a few years ago.Our new analysis shows that the standards can be met largely withmore efficient gasoline powered cars – we continue to project that onlymodest penetration of hybrids and only low levels of electric vehiclesare needed to meet the standards. The Draft TAR shows thatmanufacturers can meet the current standards for MY 2022-2025 withconventional gasoline vehicles that use internal combustion engines withwell-understood technologies. This is consistent with what the NationalAcademies of Science found in a comprehensive 2015 study. Manufacturerscan meet the standards at similar or even lower costs than what wasanticipated in the 2012 rulemaking with substantial fuel savings payback toconsumers.The National Program preserves consumer choice, even as it protectsthe environment and reduces fuel consumption. The National Program isdesigned to ensure that consumers can continue to buy the differing types ofvehicles they need, from compact cars, to SUVs, to larger trucks suitablefor towing and carrying heavy loads. Owners of every type of new vehicle-greenhouse-gas5/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission will enjoy gasoline savings and improved fuel economy with a reducedenvironmental footprint.Executive Summary -- Draft Technical Assessment Report: MidtermEvaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards andCorporate Average Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 –Executive Summary (PDF)(15 pp, 588 K, EPA-420-D-16-901, July 2016)Draft Technical Assessment Report: Midterm Evaluation of Light-DutyVehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average FuelEconomy Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 (PDF)(1217 pp, 36.5 MB, EPA-420-D-16-900, July 2016)Appendices -- Draft Technical Assessment Report: Midterm Evaluation ofLight-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and CorporateAverage Fuel Economy Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 (PDF)(118 pp, 5.6 MB, EPA-420-D-16-900app, July 2016)Notice of Availability of Midterm Evaluation Draft Technical AssessmentReport for Model Year 2022–2025 Light Duty Vehicle GHG Emissions andCAFE Standards (PDF)(4 pp, 229 K, published July 27, 2016)For additional documents supporting EPA’s analyses for the ProposedDetermination, see the Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid Analysis(ALPHA) Tool and the Optimization Model for reducing Emissions ofGreenhouse gases from Automobiles (OMEGA) pages.EPA Technical Projects to Inform the MidtermEvaluationEPA’s National Vehicle and Fuel EmissionsLaboratory (NVFEL), Ann Arbor, MIThrough the National Center for Advanced Technology (NCAT) locatedat EPA’s National Vehicle and Fuel Emissions Laboratory (for moreinformation, see: Vehicles and Fuels Emission Testing) in Ann Arbor,Michigan, we are researching future advanced engine and duty-vehicle-greenhouse-gas6/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission technologies to support modeling, advanced technology testing, anddemonstrations (for more information, see: Benchmarking Advanced LowEmission Light-Duty Vehicle Technology).This study examines the mass reduction potential for a full-size light-dutypickup truck.Mass Reduction and Cost Analysis—Light-Duty Pickup Truck ModelYears 2020-2025 (PDF)(1018 pp, 54.9MB, EPA-420-R-15-006, June 2015)CAE Baseline and Lightweight Models(ZIP) (71 MB, June 2015)NVFEL's National Center for AdvancedTechnologyState-of-the-art cost teardown studies, with FEV, for fuel efficienttechnologies, including mild hybrids and diesel vehiclesResearch on consumer issues, including an assessment of vehicleaffordability, a study of willingness-to-pay for various vehicle attributes,and content analysis of auto reviewsSearching for Hidden Costs: A Technology-Based Approach to theEnergy Efficiency Gap in Light-Duty Vehicles (PDF)(55 pp, 1.0 MB, EPA-420-D-15-010, November 2015)Searching for Hidden Costs: Presentation made at the University ofMichigan Energy Institute’s Conference on Transportation,Economics, Energy, and the Environment (TE3)Searching for Hidden Costs: A Technology-Based Approach to theEnergy Efficiency Gap in Light-Duty Vehicles, Presentation made atthe Association of Environmental and Resource Economists AnnualConferenceWork on economic issues, including new studies on VMT rebound andmanufacturer cost reduction through "learning by doing":Final Report and Peer Review Report for Cost Reduction throughLearning in Manufacturing Industries and in the Manufacture ofMobile Sources(PDF) (265 pp, 3.37 MB, EPA-420-R-16-018, NovemberThe Rebound Effect from Fuel Efficiency Standards: Measurementand Projection to 2035 (PDF)2016)(80 pp, 629KB, EPA-420-R-15-012, June hicle-greenhouse-gas7/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission Peer Review(PDF)(193 pp, 2.9MB, EPA-420-R-15-013, June 2015)Development of modeling tools:Vehicle simulation modeling (ALPHA - Advanced Light-DutyPowertrain and Hybrid Analysis)Technology feasibility and cost model (OMEGA - OptimizationModel for reducing Emissions of Greenhouse gases fromAutomobiles)Technology packages efficiencies (Response Surface Model)Continued investigation into potential consumer choice modeling:Consumer Vehicle Choice Model Documentation(PDF) (62 pp, 701 K, EPA-420-B-12-052,Testing a Model of Consumer Vehicle Purchases (PDF)August 2012)(42 pp, 883 K, EPA-420-D-15-011, December 2015)In addition to working with CARB and NHTSA, EPA is collaborating withDOE on projects involving vehicle light-weighting and battery costmodeling, and Environment and Climate Change Canada/Transport CanadaEXITEXITon projects involving aerodynamics, vehicle light-weighting,all-wheel drive vehicles, and other areas.In addition to these projects supporting the MTE, EPA issues The EPAAutomotive Trends Report.EPA Publications Informing the MidtermEvaluationThroughout the MTE process, EPA’s goal was to publish as much of our researchas possible in peer-reviewed journals. EPA staff have published the followingpeer-reviewed papers so far since 2013. EPA staff attended numerous technicalconferences, and assessed hundreds of papers in the literature on the wide rangeof factors considered for the MTE.The following papers are not available for download due to copyright restrictions;however, we are providing links to the abstract and ordering information on thejournals’ websites.The following links exit the siteEXIT“Consumer willingness to pay for vehicle attributes: What do we Know?”David Greene, Anushah Hossain, Julia Hofmann, Gloria Helfand, RobertBeach. Transportation Research Part A 118 (2018) 258-279.“Re-searching for hidden costs: Evidence from the adoption of fuel-savingtechnologies in light-duty vehicles. Hsing-Hsiang Huang, Gloria -vehicle-greenhouse-gas8/13

10/12/2020Midterm Evaluation of Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emissions Standards for Model Years 2022-2025 Regulations for Emission Kevin Bolon, Robert Beach, Mandy Sha, Amanda Smith. TransportationResearch Part D 65 (2018) 194-212.“Testing and Benchmarking a 2014 GM Silverado 6L80 Six SpeedAutomatic Transmission,” SAE Technical Paper 2017-01-5020, 2017, doi:10.4271/2017-01-5020, Stuhldreher, M., Kim, Y., Kargul, J., Moskalik, A.et al.“Critical factors affecting life cycle assessments of material choice forvehicle mass reduction,” Troy Hottle, Cheryl Caffrey, Joseph McDonald,Rebecca Dodder. Transportation Research Part D 56 (2017) 241-257.“Searching for Hidden Costs: A Technology-Based Approach to the EnergyEfficiency Gap in Light-Duty Vehicles,” Helfand et al. (2016), EnergyPolicy 98: 590-606."Developing the AC17 Efficiency Test for Mobile Air Conditioners," SAETechnical Paper 2013-01-0569, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0569, Sciance,F., Nelson, B., Yassine, M., Patti, A., and Rao, L."Maneuver-based Battery-in-the-Loop Testing - Bringing Reality to theLab," SAE Int. J. Alt. Power, 2(1):2013, doi:10.4271/2013-01-0157, Dagci,O., Pereira, N., and Cherry, J."Development of Advanced Light-Duty Powertrain and Hybrid AnalysisTool," SAE Technical Paper 2013-01-0808, 2013, doi:10.4271/2013-010808, Lee, B., Lee, S., Cherry, J., Neam, A., Sanchez, J., and Nam, E."Modeling and Validation of Power-Split and P2 Parallel Hybrid ElectricVehicles,”

EPA, NHTSA, and CARB jointly issued a Draft TAR for public comment in July. 2016. The Draft TAR was a technical report, not a decision document, and. examined a wide range of issues relevant to the 2022-2025 standards. Highlights of the Draft Technical Assessment Report: Automakers are innova

Related Documents:

Algebra 2 - Midterm Exam Review The Algebra 2 Midterm Exam must be taken by ALL Algebra 2 students. An exemption pass may be used to exempt the score for the Algebra 2 Midterm Exam. It should be presented to your teacher prior to taking the exam. The Algebra 2 Midterm Exam will consist of 30 multiple choice questions.

CS231A Midterm Review May 19, 2017. Midterm Logistics In-class midterm at Skilling Auditorium at 3:00-4:20 PM on May 22, 2017 . Unique Cases of Epipolar Geometry . This review session is not comprehensive of all material on the exam! .

(Golang) Consider the following Go program: server-midterm-4.go. Execute the server-midterm-4.go first. Then start two extra terminals. Execute client-102.go on the two terminals back to back. server-midterm-4.go package main import "fmt" import "bufio" import "net" import "time"

On each exam, you will be given a MIPS Green Sheet attached to the exam. Midterm 1: Covers up to and including the 07/02 lecture on CALL. Midterm 1: One 8.5"x11", double-sided cheat sheet. The clobber policy allows you to override your Midterm 1 and Midterm 2 scores with the score of the corresponding section on the final exam if you

Geometry Midterm Review Packet 7 Geometry: Midterm Short Answer Practice 1. Find the coordinates of point P along the directed line segment AB so that AP to PB is the given ratio. A) A(1, 3), B(8, 4); 4 to 1 B) A(-2, 1), B(4, 5); 3 to 7 2. Determine if the following lines are parallel, perpendicular, or neither. Explain your reasoning. A) 1

International (Integra), undertook a midterm performance evaluation of USAID’s Central Africa Regional Program for the Environment’s third phase (CARPE III). The assessment took place from mid-October to the end of November 2016. This was a complex evaluation involving four

USAID U.S. Agency for International Development UVG Universidad del Valle de Guatemala . USAID.GOV LRCP MIDTERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION . LRCP MIDTERM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION USAID.GOV Awareness of and demand for evidence-based EGL information remain relatively low in the LAC region. The monitoring and evaluation (M&E) and KII/FGD data reflect .

EU Tracker Questions (GB) Total Well Total Badly DK NET Start of Fieldwork End of Fieldwork 2020 15/12/2020 16/12/2020 40 51 9-11 08/12/2020 09/12/2020 41 47 12-6 02/12/2020 03/12/2020 27 57 15-30 26/11/2020 27/11/2020 28 59 13-31 17/11/2020 18/11/2020 28 60 12-32 11/11/2020 12/11/2020 28 59 12-31 4/11/2020 05/11/2020 30 56 13-26 28/10/2020 29/10/2020 29 60 11-31