Final Evaluation Report Of 08 African Adaptation Programme .

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
1.56 MB
53 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Tia Newell
Transcription

Federal Democratic Republic of EthiopiaEnvironmental Protection AuthorityFinal Evaluation ReportofAfrican Adaptation Programme:Supporting Climate ResilientSustainable Development in EthiopiaByTadesse Woldemariam GoleandMillion BekeleAddis AbabaFebruary 2013i

Table of ContentList of Acronyms. iii1 Executive Summary. 11.11.21.31.41.51.6Brief description of project .1Context and purpose of the evaluation .1The evaluation approach and method .2Main achievement.2Main Conclusions .3Recommendations .42.12.22.32.4Purpose of the final evaluation .6Key issues addressed .6Methodology of the evaluation .8Structure of the evaluation .82 Introduction . 63 The Project and its Development Context . 93.1 Project start and its duration .93.2 Challenges that program sought to address . 103.3 Objective and goal of the project . 113.3.1 Goal of the project . 113.3.2 Project Objective . 11123.3.3 Expected outputs . 11123.4 Main stakeholders . 124 Findings and Conclusions . 12134.1 Project Formulation . 12134.1.1 Formulation processes . 12134.1.2 Stakeholder participation . 13144.1.3 Replication approach . 154.1.4 Cost effectiveness . 15164.1.5 Linkage of the program and other interventions within the sector . 164.1.6 Management arrangement . 174.1.7 Indicators . 204.1.8 General strengths and weaknesses of project formulation . 204.2 Project Implementation . 214.2.1 Delivery . 214.2.2 Financial management . 21224.2.3 Monitoring and evaluation . 224.2.4 Implementation Modalities . 234.2.5 Coordination with WFP, UNICEF and UNDP . 24254.2.6 Coordination with other partners and operational issues . 25264.3 Results . 264.3.1 Attainment of Objective/Goal . 264.3.2 Attainment of Outputs . 26274.3.3 Sustainability. 334.3.4 Replicability . Error! Bookmark not defined.Error! Bookmark not defined.5 Lessons Learned . 34356 Conclusions and Recommendations . 376.16.2Conclusions . 37Recommendations . 3738Annexes . 3940Evaluation ToRs, itinerary and list of persons interviewed. 3940ANNEX 2. LIST OF KEY PERSONS MET . 4748ANNEX 3. Documents Reviewed . 4748ii

List of /LRTICADTWGUNDPUNICEFUNIDOWFPAfrican Adaptation ProgramAdaptation Learning MechanismAnnual Work PlanClimate Action IntelligenceClimate ChangeClimate Change AdaptationClimate Resilient Green EconomyDeputy Director GeneralEnvironmental Protection AuthorityEthiopian Plan of Action to Adapt to Climate Change.Global Environment FacilityGovernment of JapanGrowth and Transformation PlanLetter of AgreementLeadership Results ProgramMonitoring and EvaluationA Mechanism to Motivate, Support and Reward ResultMinistry of Agriculture,Ministry of EducationMinistry of Finance and Economic DevelopmentMinistry of HealthMinistry of IndustryMinistry of Mines,Ministry of Women, Children and Youth AffairMinistry of Water and EnergyMeasuring, Reporting and VerificationMid-term reviewNational Climate Change ForumNational ExecutionNational Meteorological Services AgencyNational Project ManagerNatural Resources and EnvironmentPlan for Accelerated and Sustained Development to End PovertyProject Coordination UnitProject Management TeamProject Progress ReportsProject Steering CommitteeQuarterly Progress Report (Results Management GuidelinesSustainable Development of the Protected Area System in EthiopiaDisaster Risk Reduction and Livelihoods RecoveryTokyo International Conference on African DevelopmentTechnical Working GroupUnited Nations Development ProgramUnited Nations Children’s FundUnited Nations Industrial Development OrganizationWorld Food Programiii

Evaluation Team:The evaluation was conducted by two National Consultants, namely Dr. TadesseWoldemariam Gole (Lead Consultant) and Mr. Million Bekele (Consultant). Dr. Tadesse isforest ecologist by training, has over 19 years experiences in research, teaching andconsultancy works. His areas of expertise include natural resources vation,climatechange,carbonprojectsdevelopment, environmental impact assessment, project documents preparation, and projectimpact evaluation. He is currently employed as Director of Environment and Coffee Forestforum (ECFF), a non-profit research and development organization in Ethiopia.Mr. Million Bekele is a forester by training, with more than 30 years experiences in naturalresources management, forestry, soil and water conservation, and land use planning. Heserved the Forestry Sector of the Ministry of Agriculture in different leadership positions. Heis currently a freelance consultant.iv

1 Executive Summary1.1 Brief description of projectThe Africa Adaptation Program (AAP) in Ethiopia is funded by the Government of Japan andimplemented through the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). Its implementation startedin April 2010. The project is classified as NEX, nationally executed project and the PrincipalImplementing Agency is the Federal Environmental Protection Authority (EPA). The total budget ofthe project is US 6,482,749.The objective of AAP is to establish an integrated approach to Ethiopia’s management of climatechange opportunities and risks. It supports to achieve transformational change, designed to elevateclimate change adaptation planning and interventions from a mono-project and sectorial basedapproach to a comprehensive and strategic approach, characterized by multi-sectorial integratedplanning.It focuses on strengthening capacity in five areas that are crucial to designing and implementing aresilient development agenda, namely Institutional Leadership and Capacity Development;implementing climate-resilient policies in priority sectors; Innovative Finance and KnowledgeManagement. Key elements include mainstreaming adaptation measures into the nationaldevelopment processes that are achieved by assisting key ministries and regional state to integrate theNational Adaptation Strategy into the budgeting cycle.1.2 Context and purpose of the evaluationThe objective of the Evaluation was to critically assess the stages of the project and its productsthrough review of documents and stakeholders interview, measuring to what extent the objectives andoutputs have been achieved against the results and resources framework, and identifying factors thathave hindered or facilitated the success of the project. It was carried out to provide a comprehensiveand systematic account of the relevance, success and performance of the AAP project by assessing theproject design, process of implementation and results as they relate to the project output targets. Itaimed at capturing key lessons to assess what adaptation approaches/measures were effective invarious thematic areas, promoting AAP’s lessons so that the legacies of the AAP will be replicatedand generating recommendations that could be utilized in similar projects in the future1

1.3 The evaluation approach and methodThe evaluation team was guided by evaluation criteria and guidance given in the Terms of Referencein conducting this final evaluation and preparing the report. The evaluation approaches includedreview of documents, interviews and follow-up inquiries. The evaluation was conducted in aparticipatory manner through a combination of processes. More attention has been given to projectaccomplishments against the planned actions.1.4 Main achievementThe main achievements of AAP Ethiopia are: Conducted baseline studies on climate change vulnerability, adaptation capacity and adaptation optionsand indicative costs at regional and sectorial levels; Supported formulation of the Climate Resilient Green Economy (CRGE) Strategy and development ofthe Ethiopian Plan of Action to Adapt to Climate Change (EPACC); Initiated climate change mainstreaming activities in Sector Ministries and Regional states; Supported the establishment of technical working groups (TWG) within 12 sectoral institutions and at9 regions and 2 city administrations. These institutionshave developed their respective climatechange adaptation plans; Sensitization of the members of parliament through workshops and seminars on: Awareness onClimate Change; Mainstreaming Climate Change in Development Programmes; Climate Change,Environmental Issues and Ethiopia’s Negotiation Position; Climate Resilient and Building GreenEconomy; Climate Resilient Green Economy; and Green Economy Strategy and Vision of Ethiopia; 9 regional states and 2 city administrations prepared Green Growth Investment Plans; Carried out leadership capacity building activities and climate change adaptation actions at Woredalevel; 16 green technologies piloted in 97 woredas selected from different national regional states; Over 300 parliamentarians, the heads of eleven regional environment bureaus and 13 department headsfrom sector ministries have participated in the sensitization program on CC risks and opportunities. 46 experts and middle level decision makers from 9 sectorial institutions participated in the Leadershipfor Results Program (LRP) training in three rounds; Climate Action Intelligence (CAI) training was given to 20 participants from differentorganizations including EPA and UNDP andassessment and design proposalforestablishment and maintenance a climate action intelligence and National Registry System forEthiopia developed Climate change adaptation regional information toolkits for local adaptation and planning purposeshave been completed;2

The implementation of demonstration projects of good practiceshave been documented anddisseminated in the form of a booklet and documentary films A Mechanism to Motivate, Support and Reward Result (mMSRr) has been designed and launched inregional states level, engaging both the sectors and regional state agencies. The development planning at national level has incorporated CC by the coordinating agency, MoFED,during the preparation of the current medium-term development plan, the GTP; AAP built capacities to design and implement financing options. Sectorial offices and regional bureaushave worked toward the estimation of costs of implementation their climate change adaptation plans; Financing options have been realigned from past practices to meet national adaptation costs andcomplement resources emerging through donor and other assistance program. Continuous support ofAAP has contributed to the establishment of the Ethiopian CRGE Facility as a financing mechanism toCC. The regional states have also decided to allocate 2% of their budget for environment, which is a newdevelopment attributable to AAP. A documentary video on environmental education and protection was also produced; Compendium on green technologies prepared with the objective of providing basic information on theidentified technologies for scaling up; a platform for documenting and disseminating model school-based activities has been established(http://www.ccee-ethiopia.org) Web based climate change Knowledge Management platforms established at the EPA; Teachers have been trained to develop environmental club action plans. Around 12 schools identified were provided with solar powered water pumps. Around 562 schools and 2812 teachers were covered through a mechanism of sharing new informationand innovations through Cluster Schools Supported the development of strategies and guidelines, including: “Knowledge Management andCommunication Strategy for Climate Change Adaptation in Ethiopia” and “Journalist’s Guide toReporting Climate Change Adaptation Issues in Ethiopia”. Recruited full-time national and regional project coordinators, and provided necessaryfacilities for coordination.1.5 Main Conclusions The concept of the design project with multiple implementing agencies and stakeholders is highlyinnovative and appropriate to deal with complex issues like climate change. But, consultationswith key stakeholders were not thorough enough to clearly define their roles and responsibilities,3

which led to delays in starting project implementation. The project implementation period wasalso too short for such a project with multiple outputs activities. Climate change issues were only dealt with ad hoc committees in the past. The AAP hascontributed to the development of national strategies and integration of the issues into national andlocal development plans. AAP has also initiated cooperation between various stakeholders, consolidated fragmented effortsand generated adaptation technologies in short time. The AAP was very instrumental in sensitization, awareness raising and compilation of goodpractices on climate change adaptation for wider dissemination. The project has enhanced the capacity of many stakeholders through several trainings workshopsand seminars on climate change adaptation and mainstreaming into development plans. The strong focus given to demonstration projects and scaling up efforts in the implementation ofEthiopian AAP project is highly commendable. However, the level of engagement by relevantsectorial ministries for the demonstrated adaptation projects was not adequate for smooth takeoverand dissemination of the technologies in the future. Besides, the project focused on materialsupply only, with little attention to building capacities of communities and development agents toadopt and operationalize the technologies. Delivery of the project outputs was outstanding. However, it was not well communicated tostakeholders to increase impact.1.6 RecommendationsBased on the lessons learned from AAP project implementation in Ethiopia, the followingrecommendations are forwarded for similar project innervations in the future: The project design should be home-born, bottom-up and participatory in which the roles andresponsibilities of key stakeholders well defines, with proportional resources distribution. The

Sustainable Development in Ethiopia. ii . in conducting this final evaluation and preparing the report. The evaluation approaches included review of documents, interviews and follow-up inquiries. . establishment and maintenance a climate action intelligence and National

Related Documents:

Final Exam Answers just a click away ECO 372 Final Exam ECO 561 Final Exam FIN 571 Final Exam FIN 571 Connect Problems FIN 575 Final Exam LAW 421 Final Exam ACC 291 Final Exam . LDR 531 Final Exam MKT 571 Final Exam QNT 561 Final Exam OPS 571

ART 224 01 05/01 04:00 PM AAH 208 ART 231 01 05/02 04:00 PM AAH 138 . Spring 2019 Final Exam Schedule . BIOL 460 01 No Final BIOL 460 02 No Final BIOL 460 03 No Final BIOL 491 01 No Final BIOL 491 02 No Final BIOL 491 03 No Final BIOL 491 04 No Final .

EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW TEMPLATE Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning August 2017 EVALUATION REPORT CHECKLIST AND REVIEW TEMPLATE-4 Evaluation Report Review Template This Review Template is for use during a peer review of a draft evaluation report for assessing the quality of the report.

ME 2110 - Final Contest Timeline and Final Report Preparation March 31, 2014 C.J. Adams Head TA . Agenda 2 Overview of this week Final Contest Timeline Design Review Overview Final Report Overview Final Presentation Overview Q&A . MARCH Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday .

POINT METHOD OF JOB EVALUATION -- 2 6 3 Bergmann, T. J., and Scarpello, V. G. (2001). Point schedule to method of job evaluation. In Compensation decision '. This is one making. New York, NY: Harcourt. f dollar . ' POINT METHOD OF JOB EVALUATION In the point method (also called point factor) of job evaluation, the organizationFile Size: 575KBPage Count: 12Explore further4 Different Types of Job Evaluation Methods - Workologyworkology.comPoint Method Job Evaluation Example Work - Chron.comwork.chron.comSAMPLE APPLICATION SCORING MATRIXwww.talent.wisc.eduSix Steps to Conducting a Job Analysis - OPM.govwww.opm.govJob Evaluation: Point Method - HR-Guidewww.hr-guide.comRecommended to you b

Section 2 Evaluation Essentials covers the nuts and bolts of 'how to do' evaluation including evaluation stages, evaluation questions, and a range of evaluation methods. Section 3 Evaluation Frameworks and Logic Models introduces logic models and how these form an integral part of the approach to planning and evaluation. It also

The evaluation roadmap presents the purpose of the evaluation, the evaluation questions, the scope of the evaluation and the evaluation planning. The Steering Group should be consulted on the drafting of the document, and they should approve the final content. The roadmap identifies the evaluation

The key evaluation questions are presented in Exhibit 1. The evaluation questions, as originally listed in the Statement of Work (SOW), were refined and reorganized in light of subsequent developments and discussions with USAID. Exhibit 1: Revised Evaluation Questions Original Evaluation Questions Final Evaluation Questions Implementation Progress