Guidelines For The Prescription Of A Seated Wheelchair Or .

2y ago
24 Views
2 Downloads
2.78 MB
104 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Mariam Herr
Transcription

Guidelinesfor the prescription ofa seated wheelchair ormobility scooter for peoplewith a traumatic brain injuryor spinal cord injury

Guidelines for the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter forpeople with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injuryThis publication is endorsed by Occupational Therapy (OT) Australia – NSW DivisionYou may copy, distribute, display and otherwise freely deal with this work for any purpose, provided thatyou attribute the LTCSA and EnableNSW as the owners. However, you must obtain permission if youwish to (1) charge others for access to the work (other than at cost), (2) include the work in advertising ora product for sale, or (3) modify the work.ISBN: 978-1-921422-18-8Suggested citation:EnableNSW and Lifetime Care & Support Authority, Guidelines for the prescription of a seated wheelchairor mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury. EnableNSW and LTCSAEditor, 2011, Sydney.For further copiescontactEnableNSW on enable@hss.health.nsw.gov.auLifetime Care on enquiries@lifetimecare.nsw.gov.audownload fromEnableNSW px EnableNSW and Lifetime Care & Support AuthorityFirst edition 2011A guideline review is scheduled for 2016It is anticipated that a literature search will be undertaken and the guidelines reviewed and updatedwhere appropriate in 2016.2Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury

Working party membersNamePositionOrganisationJeanine AllaousSenior Occupational TherapistBrain InjuryRoyal Rehabilitation CentreAdrian ByakPhysiotherapistSpinal Cord InjuryAssistive Technology Seating ServiceNorthern Sydney Central Coast Health ServicePrivate PracticeDanielle CollinsSenior Occupational TherapistSpinal Cord InjuryPrince of Wales Hospital Spinal UnitAllie Di MarcoOccupational TherapistSpinal Cord InjuryPrivate practiceLinda ElliottStatewide Equipment AdvisorEnableNSWHealth Support Services NSW HealthBill FisherRehabilitation EngineerAssistive Technology Seating Service NorthernSydney Central Coast Health ServiceKate HopmanSenior Occupational TherapistTraumatic Brain InjuryLiverpool Hospital Brain Injury RehabilitationUnitGreg KilleenSpinal cord injury consumerrepresentativeSuzanne LulhamDirector, Service DeliveryLifetime Care & Support AuthorityJodie NichollsSenior Occupational TherapistBrain InjuryWestmead Brain Injury Rehabilitation UnitRepresentative of Occupational TherapyAustralia – NSW DivisionThi Hong NguyenBrain injury consumer representativeSally OatesProject OfficerEnableNSWHealth Support Services NSW HealthLesley RadbronSenior Service Development andReview OfficerLifetime Care & Support AuthorityLyndall RossSenior Occupational TherapistBrain InjuryMid Western Brain Injury RehabilitationProgramCharisse TurnballSenior Occupational TherapistProject Officer and author of SpinalSeating education websiteState Spinal Cord Injury Service Seatingprofessional development programSue LukersmithProject OfficerAuthorLifetime Care & Support Authority /EnableNSWGuidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury3

Conflict of interestAt the beginning of the guidelines development process the working party members were required to declareany real or perceived conflict of interest. One member declared the potential for a perceived conflict of interestbecause a family member was employed by a supplier. It was anticipated that only wheelchair features wouldbe discussed, not suppliers or brands. Nevertheless, the working party decided and documented that if thosetopics arose, the party member with the potential conflict of interest would be excluded from the discussion.However, those subjects were not discussed and no conflict of interest occurred.AcknowledgmentsExternal reviewers (international, national, NSW and interstate)EnableNSW and LTCSA wish to thank the more than 25 individuals, specialist services, consumer organisationsand professional associations who reviewed and in some instances trialled parts of the guidelines during theirdevelopment. They are listed in Appendix 1.4Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury

ContentsForeword7Executive summary91. Introduction102. Methodology and evidence for recommendations123. Framework and approach154. Ethics175. Goals and evaluation185.1 Goals185.2 Evaluation and outcome measures206. Assessment and review236.1 When and where to assess236.2 Order of prescription of the seating system and wheelchair246.3 Review246.4 Client changes246.5 Reasons for non-use257. Capacity and performance267.1 Physical capacity267.2 Decision making capacity277.3 Psycho-social and behavioural considerations287.4 Cognition and perception287.5 Sensory impairments307.5.1 RTA requirements307.5.2 Vision307.5.3 Hearing317.6 Upper limb capacity and risk of injury327.6.1 Upper limb capacity327.6.2 Upper limb injury347.7 Cardiovascular fitness397.8 Co-morbid conditions397.9 Alcohol, prescribed medications and illicit drug use.407.10 Long-term need407.11 Health and safety concerns417.12 Two wheelchairs45Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury5

8. Wheelchair features468.1 Pressure management468.2 Ride and comfort478.3 Tilt in space488.4 Elevating leg rest518.5 Elevating seat528.6 Back rest529. Propulsion539.1 Power or manual539.2 Foot propulsion539.3 Power assisted549.4 Drive wheel position559.5 Control device5710. Scooters5811. Training6011.1 Training duration6011.2 Training content6111.3 Training in propulsion techniques6411.4 Mode of training6412. Transport6512.1 Public transport6712.2 Standards6913. Maintenance7014. Resources7314.1 Goals checklist7314.2 Shoulder injury risk management strategy checklist7414.3 Long-term need checklist7514.4 Training topics checklist7614.5 Injury prevention during transportation checklist7714.6 Maintenance checklist7814.7 Wheelchair comfort tool7914.8 Internet-based education and information8515. Appendices86Appendix 1 External reviewers86Appendix 2 Definitions and terms88Appendix 3 Abbreviations92Appendix 4 ICF framework93Appendix 5 Convention on the rights of people with disabilities (CRPD)94References6Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury95

Forewordby Dr Rhonda Galbally, AOThe United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities promotes and protects the rights anddignity of persons with disabilities. In 2009, Australia ratified the Convention and so affirmed our agreement andobligation to take measures which meet the rights of persons with disabilities.Anyone in NSW with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury who needs a wheelchair can have one.Wheelchairs and mobility scooters not only remove physical and environmental barriers, but can assist with theuser’s activity and participation in many aspects of life. The appropriate wheelchair, for the person and theirenvironments, can enhance not only their quality of life, but also the lives of families, friends and attendant careworker and carers. In contrast, poor prescription of a wheelchair or mobility scooter can mean the person ismore dependent, has fewer opportunities and often will be excluded from participation in their community.The Guidelines for the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic braininjury or spinal cord injury provide a synthesis of the recent research evidence and guidance to help work outwhich is the most appropriate wheelchair. The guidelines also affirm that the person is, and should be, central tothe prescription of their wheelchair, and involved in all stages.I commend the guidelines to you. They are a very useful tool for all wheelchair and mobility scooter users inlifting the standard of consumer choice, as well as highly valuable for their direct purpose, that of assisting in theprescribing of wheelchairs and scooters.Dr. Rhonda Galbally, AOChair National People with Disability and Carers CouncilGuidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury7

Forewordby Dr Adeline Hodgkinson and Dr James MiddletonA wheelchair is a vital item of assistive technology that is prescribed to enhance an individual’s function andindependence, increase participation in activities and community, and improve health outcomes and overallquality of life.The need to identify and balance competing priorities contributes to the complexity of wheelchair prescription.Successful wheelchair provision involves collaboration between the wheelchair user, carers, other relevantpeople, clinicians, suppliers and funding bodies.It is recognised that incorporating the latest evidence into daily practice is essential. Few evidence-based clinicalguidelines exist in the field of brain injury or spinal cord injury.While the use of evidence-based clinical guidelines does not replace clinical reasoning or the need for cliniciansto research the evidence and remain up-to-date, they can provide a basis for further investigation and a structurefor more informed practice.These guidelines have been developed collaboratively with input from experts in the field of wheelchairprescription. The project included a systematic literature review and analysis of all available relevant research inthis field.We would encourage clinicians to use these guidelines as a tool in the wheelchair prescription process for peoplewith acquired brain or spinal cord injury.We acknowledge the role of EnableNSW and LTCSA in providing funding for these guidelines. We congratulatethe working party on the thoroughness with which they developed the guidelines and their comprehensiveapproach to wheelchair prescription.Dr Adeline Hodgkinson Dr James MiddletonChair ChairBrain Injury Rehabilitation Program State Spinal Cord Injury ServiceAgency for Clinical Innovation Agency for Clinical InnovationNSW Health NSW Health8Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury

Executive summaryProviding a wheelchair or scooter is a complex therapy intervention which aims to enhance a person’sfunctioning. The Guidelines for the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter relate to two healthconditions—spinal cord injury and traumatic brain injury. The guidelines have been developed using a rigorousmethodology of searching for, appraising and grading the research evidence in conjunction with a working party.The topics covered were generated by the concerns and clinical questions raised by the working party. Theguidelines are intended to inform and guide the therapist on clinical actions and decisions, but do not replace theneed for clinical supervision or clinical judgment.The guidelines provide recommendations that range from topics on the goals and evaluation, assessmentand review, capacity and performance of the client, upper limb capacity and risk of injury, wheelchair features,through to propulsion, training, transport and maintenance. Resources have been developed to support theuse of the guidelines and include checklists on key areas such as shoulder injury prevention, long-term needs,training, transport and maintenance.Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury9

1. Introduction1IntroductionBackgroundEnableNSW (NSW Department of Health) and theNSW Lifetime Care and Support Authority (LTCSA)have funded the development of evidence-basedguidelines to help therapists prescribe a seatedwheelchair or mobility scooter for a person withtraumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury.The population and applicablehealth conditions (refer to glossary) adults with traumatic brain injury adults with spinal cord injuryThe definition of adult for these guidelines is 16 yearsand older.The guidelines were developed in consultation with aworking party of specialist brain and spinal cord injurytherapists, rehabilitation and assistive technologyexperts, consumer representatives and researchers.The working party also included representatives fromNSW Health and the NSW Lifetime Care and SupportAuthority.The guidelines are intended to inform and guide thetherapist, but are not rigid regulations. Nor do theyreplace the need for clinical supervision or clinicaljudgment. They are not an education tool. Theseguidelines are different from procedures and processguidelines required by a funding body or those whichrelate to policy or statutory obligations.The guidelines use a framework which is informedby a bio-psychosocial model of health, theInternational Classification of Functioning (ICF)212 forhealth conditions, and the human rights approacharticulated in the Convention of the Rights of Personswith Disability (CRPD).189When to consult these guidelinesPurpose and scopeThe guidelines do not present new assessmenttools, although new checklists have been developed.They also do not recommend particular brands ofwheelchairs or scooters. The evidence for somefeatures is included where appropriate and related toclinical questions raised by the working party.Our experience has shown that a wheelchair that ispoorly matched to individual need adversely affectspotential activities and participation, lifestyle goalsand health status, as well as adding to costs. Throughjudicious application of the available research, theseguidelines provide best practice recommendationsfor prescribing the most appropriate wheelchair for anindividual.They include seated wheelchairs and mobilityscooters but exclude standing wheelchairs andprone trolleys. Although standing wheelchairs, pronetrolleys and other forms of wheeled mobility are notmentioned, this does not mean that they cannot beconsidered in the prescription process.10These guidelines are relevant to therapists treatingadults with spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injuryor both, whose impairments impact on their functionwith respect to mobility, activity or participation.Intended usersThe intended users of the guidelines are: occupational therapists and physiotherapists whoprescribe wheelchairs for people with spinal cordinjury or traumatic brain injury professionals with specific expertise who areinvolved in the prescription of a wheelchair, forexample, rehabilitation engineers.Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury

1. IntroductionRelated publicationsThe publications in this series include: Guidelines for the prescription of a seated wheelchairor mobility scooter for people with a traumatic braininjury or spinal cord injury Summary of the guidelines for the prescription ofa seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for peoplewith a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury Consumer information brochure for the guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair ormobility scooter for people with a traumatic braininjury or spinal cord injury Technical report for the guidelines for theprescription of a seated wheelchair or mobilityscooter for people with a traumatic brain injury orspinal cord injury.In these guidelines the term wheelchair will beused rather than seated wheelchair and scooterwill be used rather than mobility scooter. When aguideline or recommendation includes scootersit will be specified. The term attendant careworker (who is paid) will also refer to carer (whois unpaid).Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury11

2. Methodology and evidence for recommendations2Methodology and evidence commendations in these guidelines has beengraded according to rigorously applied criteria. Thissection summarises the method used to develop thegrading system. A full explanation is provided in theTechnical Report (http://www.lifetimecare.nsw.gov.au/Resources.aspx or The guidelines have been developed through asystematic appraisal of relevant literature publishedbetween 1999 and August 2010. Research identifiedthrough the literature search was assessed forrelevance and critically appraised by two reviewers.Research study appraisal was based on the NationalHealth and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)levels for the strength of evidence (levels I–IV) andgrading system for guideline recommendations.92,93, 143The literature has included reviews and studiesof wheelchair user’s experiences and perspectives.Qualitative and single case studies were alsoconsidered in order to strengthen the body ofevidence. The research evidence was then presentedto the working party.Research articles were appraised according to studydesign: Quantitative studies were assessed using anexpanded version of the (NHMRC) appraising theevidence checklist.142 The partitioned PEDro scalewas also utilised for intervention studies.158 Qualitative studies were evaluated with theMcMaster’s University qualitative appraisal checklistLetts et al (2007).115 Single case studies were reviewed using the SingleCase Experimental Design (SCED) scale.181 Systematic reviews were not appraised.12The strength of the body of evidence for eachrecommendation was determined using the NHMRCgrades for recommendations143 with adaptations.The NHMRC grades use a hierarchical model ofquantitative research methods. Systematic reviewsor meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials areconsidered to be the most robust evidence.The NHMRC grading does not incorporate goodqualitative research or single case studies, but thesemethodologies may be relevant to a number ofquestions raised by therapists for these guidelines.Given the complexity of the intervention, clinicalquestions and context variables posed by the workingparty, it was important to include qualitative researchin grading recommendations.203 The qualitativeresearch was appraised and included in thedetermination of the grade for each recommendation.The way in which qualitative research wasincorporated within the NHMRC recommendationsis outlined in Table 1. Single case studies were notincluded in grading the recommendations. The viewsor interests of EnableNSW and the Lifetime Careand Support Authority have not influenced the finalrecommendations.All the research on which these recommendationsare based is included in the evidence tables in theTechnical Report. The recommendation grades aredescribed in Table 1.Guidelinesfor the prescription of a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for people with a traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury

2. Methodology and evidence for recommendationsTable 1 Grade of recommendationGrade ofrecommendationDescriptionABody of evidence can be trusted to guide practice. One or more level I or several level II studies with low risk of bias and all studiesconsistent, or inconsistency can be explained. The clinical impact is very large. The population(s) studied in the body of evidence are the same as the targetpopulation for the guidelines. Directly applicable to the Australian healthcare context.BBody of evidence can be trusted to guide practice in most situations. One or two level II studies with a low risk of bias or a systematic review/several levelIII studies with a low risk of bias with most studies consistent or inconsistencies canbe explained. Clinical impact is substantial. Population studied in the bod

EnableNSW (NSW Department of Health) and the NSW Lifetime Care and Support Authority (LTCSA) have funded the development of evidence-based guidelines to help therapists prescribe a seated wheelchair or mobility scooter for a person with traumatic brain injury or spinal cord inj

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan