CHESS DEVELOPMENTS

2y ago
33 Views
7 Downloads
5.47 MB
323 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Baylee Stein
Transcription

CHESS DEVELOPMENTSthe Sicilian DragonDAVID VIGORITOEVERYMAN CHESSwww.everymanchess.com

First published in 2011 by Gloucester Publishers pic (formerly Everyman Publisherspic), Northburgh House, 10 Northburgh Street, London EC1V OATCopyright 2011 David VigoritoThe right of David Vigorito to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyrights, Designs and Patents Act 1988.All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in aretrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,electrostatic, magnetic tape, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without priorpermission of the publisher.British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication DataA catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library.ISBN: 978 1 85744 675 3Distributed in North America by The Globe Pequot Press, P.O Box 480,246 Goose Lane, Guilford, CT 06437-0480.All other sales enquiries should be directed to Everyman Chess, Northburgh House,10 Northburgh Street, London EC1V OATtel: 020 72S3 7887 fax: 020 7490 3708email: info@everymanchess.com; website: www.everymanchess.comEveryman is the registered trade mark of Random House Inc. and is used in thiswork under licence from Random House Inc.For Heather and ZoeEveryman Chess SeriesChief advisor: Byron JacobsCommissioning editor: John EmmsAssistant editor: Richard PalliserTypeset and edited by First Rank Publishing, Brighton.Cover design by Horatio Monteverde.Printed and bound in Great Britain by Clays, Bungay, Suffolk.

ContentsBibliography4Introduction5Part I: 9 BC4 Bd771 Soltis Variation: 100-0-0 Rc8 11 Bb3 NeS 12 h4 hS92 Modern Variation: 100-0-0 Rc8 11 Bb3 Nes 12 Kb1583 Topalov Variation: 100-0-0 Rc8 11 Bb3 Nxd4894 Chinese Variation: 100-0-0 Rb81165 Accelerated Variation: 10 Bb3 Nxd4 11 Bxd4 bS141Part II: 9 0-0-0 and 9 g41656 90-0-0 dS 10 exds1677 9 0-0-0 d 5 10 Qe12068 90-0-0 dS 10 Kb12259 90-0-0 Nxd4 and 9 . Bd725510 9 g4288Index of Variations309Index of Complete Games318

BibliographyBooksDismantling the Sicilian, Jesus de la Villa (New in Chess 2009)Easy Guide to the Dragon, Mikhail Golubev (Everyman Chess 1999)Experts vs. the Sicilian, Jacob Aagaard & John Shaw (editors - Dragon section byMikhail Golubev; Quality Chess 2006)Openingfor White According to Anand 11, Alexander Khalifman (Chess Stars 2009)Play the Sicilian Dragon, Edward Dearing (Gambit 2004)Sicilian Attacks, Yuri Yakovich (New in Chess 2011)Starting Out: The Sicilian Dragon, Andrew Martin (Everyman Chess 2005)The Cutting Edge - The Open Sicilian 1, Milos Pavlovic (Quality Chess 2010)The Soltis Variation of the Yugoslav Attack, Steven Mayer (Hypermodern Press1995)Winning with the Dragon, Chris Ward (Batsford 1994)Winning with the Sicilian Dragon 2, Chris Ward (Batsford 2001)PeriodicalsNew in Chess Magazine through issue 2011/6New in Chess Yearbook throug h Volume 100Electronic ResourcesChesslecture.comChesspublishing.com (Dragons section by Chris Ward and Gawain Jones)Chess TodayChess VibesMega Database 2011The Chess Mind (Dennis Monokroussos)

IntroductionThe Sicilian Dragon was one of my early loves. I still think it is a great opening tolearn from because there are so many thematic tactical and positional ideas. It isan opening that is ripe with exchange sacrifices and opposite side castling attacks.The Dragon is an opening where one can learn about the dynamic balance between the initiative and material; attack and counterattack; and pawn structureand piece play. It is also a fun opening to analyse at home, and I have always keptan interest in the Dragon even long after I stopped playing it regularly.Ifirst started playing the Dragon in its Accelerated version (1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 Nc6 3 d4cxd44 Nxd4 g6), which is safer than the pure Dragon (1 e4 c5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 cxd4 4Nxd4 Nf6 5 Nc3 g6) as covered in this book. The Accelerated allows the MaroczyBind (5 c4), but Black is able to avoid certain lines of the Yugoslav Attack by usingthis move order. Eventually I moved to the Dragon and entered the fascinatingworld of the Yugoslav Attack. One of the positive aspects ofthe Dragon is alsonegative in a way - it is a very narrow opening. The only critical lines are those inthe Yugoslav Attack. Black has to be very well prepared for both 9 Bc4 and 9 0-0-0(and to a lesser degree 9 g4), but other than that Black has a relatively easy life.Because there are only a couple of critical ways for White to play, Black can prepare more deeply, but there is also less variety in the opening.The Dragon introduced me to the world of 2. d6 Sicilians and after while I switchedto the more 'mature' Najdorf, which has always been more popular at higher levels.In recent years, however, the Dragon has made quite a comeback. Carlsen and Radjabov have used it regularly, while players such as Ivanchuk, Kasimdzhanov, Grischuk, Shirov, Nakamura and Gashimov have all been found on the black side.This book is broken up into two main parts. The first part covers the Yugoslav Attack with 9 Bc4. This has always been considered the sharpest way for White toplay, but Black has a relatively broad choice of responses. The five chapters coverthe Soltis Variation, which could be considered the backbone of the 9 Bc4 Dragon5

Chess Developments: The Sicilian Dragonfor Black, as well as some modern lines for both sides. I do not cover 12 h4 Nc4,which I have always found to be a bit passive. This system is very rarely playednowadays. Originally I had wanted to include the old line with . QaS. This approach was recommended by Chris Ward in his pioneering works Winning withthe Dragon and Winning with the Sicilian Dragon 2. These books influenced meand countless others. Unfortunately, this line has fallen on hard times and I wasunable to find anything to change theory's current opinion of these lines as inadequate. I have also omitted minor lines for Black.The second part of the book covers 9 0-0-0, which I consider to be the most annoying move to meet, as well as the related but less dangerous move 9 g4. Blackshould really meet 9 0-0-0 with 9. dS, but I have also covered the risky alternatives9. Nxd4 and 9. Bd7. Perhaps the biggest development in the Dragon over the lastcouple of decades has been the realization that after 9 0-0-0 dS 10 exds NxdS 11Nxc6 bxc6 12 Bd4, the near-universal 12 . eS appears to be inadequate. Black hassurvived with the once rare moves 12 . Bxd4 and 12 . NxC3, although it must besaid that in many cases he is just playing to equalize and make a draw in theselines. Black's success with these moves caused White to look for fresh approachesand thus the variations 10 Qel and 10 Kbl were born.By now the reader may have gathered that lines outside of the Yugoslav Attack arenot covered in this book. Practice has shown that lines such as the Classical, Fianchetto, and Levenfish are less dangerous for Black. Therefore they are playedmuch less frequently at a high level and develop at a slower pace. Existing Dragonliterature covers these various lines quite well and I did not have anything specialto add to them, so I decided to focus on the lines that are really the most dangerous for Black. I will highlight the 'developments' in the Dragon while also trying toexplain how they have come about, as opening theory is evolutionary. I tried towrite this book with an objective eye, but I will admit that I have some sympathyfor the Black cause.As always I have several people to thank: first and foremost my wife Heather, for,well, everything; both of our mothers, for watching Zoe the baby so that I couldwork; John Emms, for his help with the format and his patience with my neverending promises of meeting extended deadlines; Joe Fang, for the use of his library, his proof-reading, and for blitz games in 1994; and Dennis Monokroussosand Roland Loetscher for sharing their secret analysis.David Vigorito, Somerville, Massachusetts,October 20116

Part I9 Bc41 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 exd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Ne3 g6 6 Be3 Bg7 7 f3 0-0 8Qd2 Ne6 9 Be4 (Diagram 1)Diagram 1 (8)This is White's sharpest way of handling the Dragon. He prevents Black's . dSbreak while preparing to castle long and launch an attack on the black king.9 Bd77

Chess Developments: The Sicilian DragonNow White has three different moves that he can play. All may well lead to thesame position, but there are some differences. The main move is 100-0-0. After10. RcS 11 Bb3 NeS White has traditionally played 12 h4. Black's most reliable defence is 12 .hS, which is the Soltis Variation. This is covered in Chapter 1 and is byfar the largest chapter in the book. This is a wonderfully complex system andBlack's results have been relatively good over the years. In the mid-1990'S whiteplayers found a new weapon to combat the Soltis Variation - they avoided it. TheModern Variation (12 Kb1!) came to the forefront of Dragon theory and even nowBlack has some problems with this move. While it had always been accepted thatplaying Kb1 was a useful move for White, the strength of playing it so early wasnot fully appreciated.So, Black was compelled to seek new roads against 9 Bc4. There are two relativelyyoung variations that have become very popular. The first of these systems is theTopalov Variation with 11.Nxd4 12 Bxd4 bS. Just as White avoided the Soltis Variation by deviating a move early with 12 Kb1, Black passes on the traditional l1.NeSand exchanges knights instead. The second line is the Chinese Variation with10. RbS. Here Black goes a step further and does not even bring his rook to the halfopen c-file. This system is quite popular and has been played at a very high level.The 'one-upmanship' continued and White can in fact deviate on move 10 himself. It used to be quite common for White to play 10 h4 before castling. The possibility of White attacking on the h-file without castling discouraged Black from certain obscure variations. Nowadays this move is considered to limit White's optionsas much as Black's. Although the Chinese Variation does not work so well againstWhite's early advance, White can no longer play the Modern Variation with 12 Kb1and therefore the simplest way to meet 10 h4 is with 10. RcS 11 Bb3 hS! headingfor the Soltis Variation.White sometimes plays 10 Bb3 immediately. This used to be considered inaccurate(and perhaps it is), but White manages to avoid the Chinese Variation while retaining the option of playing the Modem Variation. However, Black can playa kind of'Accelerated Topalov' with 10. Nxd4 11 BxdS bS. This line can also arise from theAccelerated Dragon and for that reason this particular system has not had muchcoverage in either Dragon or Accelerated Dragon literature - it seems that Dragonbooks consider it more likely to arise from an Accelerated Dragon (which is probablytrue), while Accelerated Dragon books say that is transposes to the Dragon proper(which is also true!) and thus nobody wants to look at it. In any case, it has its owndeveloping body of theory which will be examined in Chapter 5.8

Chapter OneSoltis Variation: 10 0-0-0ReS 11 Bb3 Nes 12 h4 hS1 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 exd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Ne3 g6 6 Be3 Bg7 7 f3 0-0 SQd2 Ne6 9 Be4 Bd7 100-0-0 ReS 11 Bb3 Ne5 12 h4 h5 (Diagram 1)Diagram 1 (W)This is the starting point for the Soltis Variation, which has been considered a soundand ambitious system for Black for many years. It was this variation that Kasparov9

Chess Developments: The Sicilian Dragonturned to in his 1995 World Championship match with Anand. In order to breakthrough on the kingside, White will have to play g4 at some point and this will almost always involve the sacrifice of at least a pawn. Here Black not only has chancesto win with a counterattack; often he can take material and live to tell the tale.Nowadays 13 Bg5! is considered to be the strongest move and in fact this continuation is more popular than all other thirteenth moves combined. The consequences of this move with be examined in Games 4-11, but first we will look atWhite's other 13th moves in Games 1-3. These lines are not as critical, but they arestill seen in practice and having some insight into these lines will help to understand some of the finer points in other positions, especially those of Chapter 2.GamelV. Tregubov-A.KislinskyAlushta 20091 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 exd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Ne3 g6 6 Be3 Bg7 7 f3 0-0 B Qd2 Ne6 9 Be4Bd7 100-0-0 ReB 11 Bb3 Ne5 12 h4 h5 13 g4 (Diagram 2)Diagram 2 (B)Diagram 3 (W)This is the most direct attacking move. If this continuation was good then theSoltis Variation would not have much right to exist.13 . hxg4 14 h5 Nxh5 15 Bh6When White is trying to tear through the kingside in such a violent manner, therewill often be a decision between playing Bh6 or Rdg1. Sometimes these moves can10

Soltis Variation: 100-0-0 ReB 11 Bb3 NeS 12 h4 hSamount to the same thing if both are played, but there are usually some differences. In this case, the text move is by far the most popular. Instead 15 Rdgl Qas(Black was also·successful with ls . RxC3!? 16 bXc3 QC7 in N.Getz-J.Hammer, Reykjavik 2011) and now:a) 16 Rxhs?! gxhS 17 Bh6 Nd3 ! gave Black a winning position in K.Korley-B.5mith,Philadelphia 2009.b) 16 Bh6 is a better try, although after 16 . RxC3! 17 bxc3 Bxh6 18 Qxh6 Qxc3 19Kbl Qxd4 20 fxg4 Bxg4 21 Rxg4 Nxg4 22 Qxg6 Qg7 23 Qxhs, as in A.DimitrijevicA.Brkic, Maribor 2003, I doubt White has enough for the pawns after 23 . Nes!?15 . e6This move blocks the diagonal of the b3-bishop, covers the ds-square, and allowsBlack's queen to come to the king's defence.16 Rdgl Qf6 (Diagram 3)We will see a similar position in Chapter 2, but with the moves Kbl and . Re8thrown in. The difference may seem minor, but it actually drastically affects theassessment of the position.NOTE: In tactical positions even the slightest difference betweensimilar variations can have decisive consequences. Here one disadvantage to having the king on cl can be seen in the variation 17fxg4? Bxh6 18 Qxh6 Qf4 1 exchanging queens.17 Bxg7 Qxg7 18 fxg4 Nf6 (Diagram 4)Diagram 4 (w)Diagram 5 (B)11

Chess Developments: The Sicilian Dragon19 Nf5?This does not work, but it is difficult for White to find a good way to attack. If heplays along the lines ofthe analogous variations in Chapter 2 with 19 g5 Nh5 20Nce2 Nc4 things work out differently: 21 Bxc4 (following the recipe from Game 14;instead 21 Qb4 as 22 Qxb7 Ne5 23 c3 Nd3 24 Kb1 NC5 25 Qb6 Qe5 26 Bc2? Rb8 27Qxa5 Rxb2 28 Kxb2 Nd3 0-1 was the well-known game L.Ljubojevic-A.Miles,Brussels 1986) 21 . Rxc4 22 b3 (otherwise Ng3 is not possible) 22 . Rc5 23 Ng3 Nxg324 Rxg3 Rfc8 25 Rgh3 (Diagram 5).Now we have the same position as is reached in Game 14, but here Kb1 has notbeen played (Black's position is the same, as he has played . Rfc8 in one move instead of . Re8 followed by . Rec8). There is a slight difference now: 25 . Rxc2 26Nxc2 (or 26 QxC2 Qxd4) 26 . Qa1 mate!19. exf5 20 gxf5 Nf3 21 Qf4 Nxg1 22 Rxg1 (Diagram 6)Diagram 6 (8)Diagram 7 (W)The threat of Rxg6 looks difficult to meet, but in fact it is easily deterred by Black'snext move.22 . KhBIIt is unusual to avoid an attack by moving the king to an open file!23 Rh1 Nh5 24 Nd5 8e61 25 Ne7 8xb3 26 axb3 RceB 27 Qxd6 Rxe7?1Black was no doubt trying to choose the most practical route, but 27 . Rd8 wasprobably stronger.2B Qxe7 KgB 29 Qxb7 Qd4?112

Soltis Variation: 100-0-0 ReB 11 Bb3 Nes 12 h4 hSBetter was 29 . Ng3 30 Rdl gxfs 31 exfs Qg4.30 Kb1?White should go into the ending with 30 fxg6 fxg6 31 QdS .30. Ng3 (Diagram 7) 31 Rh3101 Rei Qd2.31 Qxe4 32 Qe7 Nxf5 33 Qh2 Qd4 34 e3 Qf60-1Game 2G.Todorovic-N.RisticVrnjacka 8anja 20101 e4 e5 2 Nf3 d6 3 d4 exd4 4 Nxd4 Nf6 5 Ne3 g6 6 Be3 Bg7 7 f3 0-0 8 Qd2 Ne6 9 Be4Bd7 100-0-0 Re8 11 Bb3 Ne5 12 h4 h5 13 Kb1 (Diagram 8)Diagram 8 (B)Diagram 9 (W)There is a strong trend for White to play an early Kbl, and with good reason. Hereis it not so dangerous, however, but this continuation could appeal to positionallyminded players.13 . Ne4Instead 13 . Re8 transposes to Games 13 and 14, but Black faces more problems inthose lines.14 Bxe4 Rxe4 (Diagram 9) 15 b3!?13

Chess Developments: The Sicilian DragonKEY DEVELOPMENT: It took a long time for white players to realizethat this move did not necessarily create tragic weaknesses. Forcingthe rook to determine its position can be quite useful for White andwe will see this move crop up again.Of the alternatives, only 'c' looks dangerous:a) 15 Nb3 QC7 16 Bd4 Bc6! has long been known to be satisfactory for Black.b) 15 Nde2 bs 16 Bh6 Qas (16 .b4 17 Bxg7 Kxg7 18 Nds Nxds 19 exds Qb6 is alsopossible) 17 Bxg7 Kxg7 18 Nf4 Rfc8 19 Ncds Qxd2 20 Rxd2 Nxds 21 Nxds Kf8 waslevel in the famous game V.Anand-G.Kasparov, World Championship (Game 11),New York 1995. The Indian Grandmaster spurned a draw and lost quickly.c) 15 g4!? (Diagram 10) is a move we can expect to see more of in the future. Afterls .hxg416 hs Nxhs White has:Diagram 10 (8)Diagram 11 (8)Cl) 17 fxg4 Bxg418 Rdgl es!? 19 Ndbs (Jones suggests 19 Nfs!? gxfs 20 exfs withcompensation for the piece and he then suggests the prudent 20 . Bxfs 21 RxhsBg6) 19 . Bf3! 20 Qd3 Rxc3 21 Nxc3 Bxhl 22 Rxhl a6!? and White did not haveenough for the pawns in K.Piorun-R.Robson, Chennai 2011.C2) 17 Rdgl!? Qc8 (perhaps Black should try 17 . Nf6) 18 Nds Re8 19 fxg4 Bxg4 andnow:C21) 20 Rh4 e6! 21 NbS? (21 N(3) 21 . exds 22 Nxd6 Qd8 23 Nxe8 Qxh4 24 Bgs Qh325 Qxds Qh2 26 Rcl Qes 27 Nxg7 Qxds 0-1 was R.Garcia Pantoja:H.DelgadoRamos, Havana 2010.14

Soltis Variation: 10 0-0-0 ReB 11 Bb3 Ne5 12 h4 h5c22) Again 20 b3! is surprisingly effective. Here Jones gives 20 . e6 21 Rxg4 exds 22Rggl Nf6 23 bXc4 Nxe4 24 Qd3 dXc4 2S Qa3 QcS 26 QxcS Nc3 27 Kal dxcS 28 NfSBes with a complicated position where Black has four pawns for a rook.lS . Rc8A typical trap is lS . RcS? 16 Ne6! winning material: for example, 16 . .fxe6(16 . Bxe6 17 BxcS) 17 BxcS dxcS 18 eS.16NdSInstead 16 Nde2 bS 17 Bd4 Bc6 18 NdS BxdS 19 exds QC7 20 Rhel Kh7?! 21 g4!hxg4 22 fxg4 Ne4 23 Qd3 Bxd4 24 Qxe4! BeS 2S hS gave White a strong attack inL.Milman-T.Daly, Philadelphia 2011. Black can avoid all of this with 17 . e6 aspointed out by Dearing, while 17 . es!? 18 Be3 b419 NdS NxdS 20 QxdS Rc6100kspromising as well.16. NxdS 17 exds (Diagram 11) 17 . QC7Again Black must avoid 17 . RcS? 18 Ne6!, while 17 .bS 18 g4! RcS 19 Ne6! RxdS 20Nxd8 Rxd2 21 Rxd2 hxg4 22 Nxf7! (22 Nb7 Bc6 gave Black decent counterplay inJ.Murey-J.Mestel, Hastings 1982/83) 22 . Rxf7 23 fxg4 Bxg4 24 Bxa7 would leaveWhite up the exchange.18 Bh61White exchanges off the Dragon bishop. This is much better than the weakening18 c4? bS! 19 cxbS Qb7 20 Bh6 QxdS when Black had the upper hand in J.MureyS.Kudrin, Beersheba 1984.TIP: When your opponent has the bishop pair, very often it is agood plan to exchange bishops, as bishops work better as ateam. Here White's knight is just as strong as Black's remainingbishop. Exchanging off the Dragon bishop also weakens Black'skingside and makes the weaknesses created by 15 b3 inconsequential.18.Qc3It would be dangerous to invite the white queen in with 18 . Bxh6 19 Qxh6: forexample, 19 . QcS 20 g4! with the idea 20 . QxdS 21 NfS Qes 22 Rhel.19 Bxg7 Qxd2 20 Rxd2 Kxg7 21 Rei (Diagram 12)Black should not really have much trouble in this ending, but White has a littlemore space so Black should not play too passively.21 . Rfe8 22 c4 a6 23 Kb215

Chess Developments: The Sicilian DragonWhite could try to discourage Black from breaking on the queenside: for example.23 a4 b5 24 cxb5 axb5 25 as (25 axb5?! RC5) 25 . Rc5 26 Nc2 Bf5 27 Kb2 Bxc2 28Rxc2 Rxd5 29 Rc7 when has White some initiative for the pawn.23 . Rc5Both here and on the next couple of moves Black should certainly consider playing.b5.24 a4 Kf6 25 Re4 Rb8 26 g4A better move order would be 26 Rde2 Re8 27 g4.26 . Re8And here Black would be better off defending with 26 .

Bibliography Books Dismantling the Sicilian, Jesus de la Villa (New in Chess 2009) Easy Guide to the Dragon, Mikhail Golubev (Everyman Chess 1999) Experts vs. the Sicilian, Jacob Aagaard & John Shaw (editors - Dragon section by Mikhail Golubev; Quality Chess 2006) Openingfor White According to Anand 11, Alexander Khalifman (Chess Stars 200

Related Documents:

UNCLASSIFIED PEO EIS 2 Agenda CHESS Organization Relation to PEO EIS, ASA(ALT) and HQDA CIO/G-6 CHESS Organizational Structure CHESS Operational Concept CHESS Authority CHESS Statement of Non-Availability (SoNA) CHESS IT e-mart SharePoint License Tracker System (LTS) CHESS Training CHESS Business/Contracts Report

Comparing Solitaire Chess to Standard Chess: Solitaire Chess is a single-player logic puzzle, not a chess game. Recreational mathematicians classify it as a “chess task,” meaning that it uses the rules of chess with appropriate adaptations. With Solitaire Chess, the basic piece movements are the same as with standard chess.

Millions of chess games have been recorded from the very beginning of chess history to the last tournaments of top chess players. Meanwhile chess engines have continuously improved up to the point they cannot only beat world chess champion

a chess teacher, Vladimir Pafuutieff, said to me, "Chess Combinations are the punch in chess. You have to develop your chess skills by understanding combinations. Virtually every chess game has a chess combination. You have to learn to recognize when a combination is available and you must land the blow! If you do this you will win a lot of .

109 Chess Endgame Study - A Comprehensive Introduction, The Roycroft 1972 370 pb 110 Chess Endings: Essential Knowledge Averbakh 1966 135 pb 111 Chess Exam and Training Guide: Tactics Khmelnitsky 2007 207 pb 112 Chess For Beginners Horowitz 1950 132 pb 113 Chess For Fun & Chess For Blood Lasker 1942 224 pb

When the elderly play chess, a robotic chess system including a simple and low-cost camera and a small robotic arm can be used to implement an automatic chess-placing system to help the elderly place the chessmen and reduce some chores. People may even play chess with a chess robot that includes the robotic chess system and software for playing.

Chess News The Montana Chess News is published for the Montana Chess Association, an affiliate of the US Chess Federation. The MCA is committed to promoting the game of Chess in Montana through education, competition, and providi

(so plays, likes, works, sings, tries, etc. are third person singular present tense forms of the verb; for any other subject the unmarked or base form of the verb is used. 1. a. I play chess.b. You play chess.c. The student plays chess. 2. a. We play chess.b. You all play chess.c. The students play chess. The only exception to this rule is