Manual For The Operation Of Research Reactors

2y ago
21 Views
2 Downloads
5.32 MB
214 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Wade Mabry
Transcription

TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES No. 37Manual for theOperation ofResearch ReactorsINTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY,VIENNA, 1965

MANUAL FOR THE OPERATIONOF RESEARCH REACTORS

The following States are Members of the International A t o m i c Energy Agency:ITALYAFGHANISTANALBANIAIVORY COASTALGERIAJAPANARGENTINAREPUBLIC OF YELORUSSIAN SOVIET SOCIALISTMOROCCONETHERLANDSREPUBLICNEW NORWAYCHILEPAKISTANCHINAPARAGUAYCOLOMBIAPERUCONGO (LfiOPOLDVILLE) .' .CUBA. .-i.-1' '; i",.V PHILIPPINES'' . /POLAND.CZECHOSLOVAK SOCIALIST REPUBLICPORTUGALDENMARKROMANIADOMINICAN REPUBLICSAUDI ARABIAECUADORSENEGALEL SALVADORSOUTH AFRICAETHIOPIASPAINFINLANDSUDANFRANCESWEDENFEDERAL REPUBLIC OF ISIAGUATEMALATURKEYHAITIUKRAINIAN SOVIET SOCIALIST. REPUBLICHOLY SEEUNION OF SOVIET SOCIALIST REPUBLICSHONDURASUNITED ARAB REPUBLICHUNGARYUNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAINAND NORTHERN IRELAND 'ICELANDINDIAUNITED STATES OF RAELYUGOSLAVIA fThe A g e n c y ' s Statute was approved on 23 October 1956 by the Conference on the Statute of theIAEA held at United Nations Headquarters,New York;Headquarters of the Agency are situated in Vienna.it entered into force on 29 July 1957.TheIts principal o b j e c t i v e is " t o accelerate and enlargethe contribution of a t o m i c energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world". IAEA,1964Permission to reproduce or translate the information contained in this publication may be obtainedby writing to the International A t o m i c Energy Agency, Karntner Ring 11, Vienna I, Austria.Printed by the IAEA in AustriaJanuary 1965

TECHNICAL REPORTS SERIES, No. 37MANUALFOR THE OPERATION OFRESEARCH REACTORSINTERNATIONAL A T O M I C ENERGY AGENCYVIENNA;' 1965

International A t o m i c E n e r g y A g e n c y .M a n u a l f o r the o p e r a t i o n of r e s e a r c h r e a c t o r s .V i e n n a , the A g e n c y , 1 9 6 5 .194 p . ( I A E A , T e c h n i c a l r e p o r t s s e r i e s n o . 37)621.039.56621.039.573.2MANUAL F O R THE O P E R A T I O N OF RESEARCH R E A C T O R S- IAEA, VIENNA, 1965STI/DOC/10/37

FOREWORDIn view of the v e r y l a r g e number of r e s e a r c h r e a c t o r s that a r e o r soonwill be in operation throughout the w o r l d , the IAEA has devoted s p e c i a l a t tention to the p r o b l e m s a s s o c i a t e d with their o p e r a t i o n and e f f i c i e n t u t i l i zation. This interest has resulted in the publication by the IAEA in 1960 ofa s m a l l manual on the "Safe Operation of C r i t i c a l A s s e m b l i e s and R e s e a r c hReactors".The great majority of the r e s e a r c h reactors in newly established centresa r e l i g h t - w a t e r c o o l e d and a r e often a l s o l i g h t - w a t e r m o d e r a t e d .Consequently, the IAEA has d e c i d e d to publish in its T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t s S e r i e sa manual dealing with the technical and p r a c t i c a l p r o b l e m s a s s o c i a t e d withthe safe and efficient operation of this type of r e a c t o r . The manual has beenwritten b y ' J. A . Cox of the Oak Ridge National L a b o r a t o r y with the a s sistance of R. Skjoeldebrand, Division of R e a c t o r s , IAEA, and C . N . Welsh,Division of Scientific and Technical Information, IAEA.Even though this manual is limited to light-water r e a c t o r s in-its d i r e c tapplication and presents the p r a c t i c e s and experience at one s p e c i f i c reactorc e n t r e , it may a l s o be useful f o r other r e a c t o r types b e c a u s e of the generalr e l e v a n c e - o f the p r o b l e m s d i s c u s s e d and the long e x p e r i e n c e upon which iti s b a s e d . It has, naturally, no r e g u l a t o r y c h a r a c t e r but it i s hoped that itwill be found helpful by staff occupied in all phases of the practical operationof r e s e a r c h r e a c t o r s , and a l s o by t h o s e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r planning their e x perimental use.

CONTENTS'INTRODUCTION' .* 'ScopeMmitati'onP A R T I.1*.2.'i .' . . - V . ' . * ' . ' " . ' . . ' /.;.:. .-. OPERATION . .*: . .» -. ' '.1;. . :'. 1.'32B a s i c c o n s i d e r a t i o n s . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I"3Staff organization . . . . . . . . ' . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T . . . " . .42 . 1 . ' .' T y p i c a l o r g a n i z a t i o n chart . . . . . ' . .A.4'.'2 . 2 . " " S i z e ' o f staff . . J.:.'4" 2 . 3 .' Responsibility'. . . . . . . . ' . . . . " . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . ." "62.4.Duties of p e r s o n n e l .'.'.". . . f . .". .63'.' T r a i n i n g ' . . ' . . ' . ' . . . ' . . 'I I . . . . . I . . . . . . . . J.i '113.1.Training r e q u i r e d by operating staff . . . . . . . . . . .113.2.A c a d e m i c training, 113.3.B a l a n c e between a c a d e m i c and' operational training . . .'11.,.' 3. 4."D e c i s i o n m a k i n g . . . . ' . . . . .' . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'.123.5."Training of r e p l a c e m e n t s '. —123.6.'Training check lists13",;' 3. 7. ' Training m a t e r i a l s . . . ' . . . . . . . " . . . ' . . . ' . . . . . . . ' . . ' . . . . . .133.8.Training f o r e m e r g e n c i e s ' . . . . 1V. .13.A. 3. 9 . ' " Study of incidents, . . . . . . . . . ' . . . I.'.,:.'. ':'.':/.".'14,'" 3 . 1 0 .Retraining ' . . . . ' . ' . . ' , i ' . . . . . . . . i . . . . . . . ''143 . 1 1 . " Qualifying examinations .'.:.144. P r e p a r a t i o n f o r initial operation . ' . . . .'14'. 4. 1.Schedule . . . . . . . " . . ' . . . . . . ' . i . . . . . . . . . . I . . .'. . i'. .'. . . .'. :144 . 2 / ' Design r e p o r t . ' . . . . ' . ' . . . . . " . ".'.;.'.15.'." 4. 3.Safety a n a l y s i s r e p o r t ' . . .'I . . . . . . . .'.'. v . V154.4.P r e l i m i n a r y o p e r a t i o n of s y s t e m s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . '154.5.Testing . . , ;. . . . . . . A . . . . . . J,'. . . . .154 . 6 . " ' Final qualification ofstaffI.".'". . 1 . ' . . . . ' . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . ;154 . 7 . ' Independent r e v i e w . . . . . ' . " . . . . . . ' .'.'. . . ' . . . .165.Initial s t a r t - u p . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . '.;.'.165.1.General considerationslb'. 5 . 2 . 'P r e c i s i o n of t e s t s . . . . . i . . . . . . A 175. 3.'Hydraulic t e s t s . . . . . . . J.'.'. . . . .17v5. 4.Core arrangement . . . i . .T'. . . ' . .'17. 't. 5. 5.' " C o n t r o l r o d s . . . . ' . . . ' . . . . . ' . A . . ' . " . . ' ' . ' . . . . . . . ' ! . . . . . . . . .1819!;.' 5 . 6 . 'Source'.'.:."[5 . 7 . ' ' Final c h e c k of safety' s y s t e m s ' . ' : : . : . - .'. '.';1920.',. 5. 8.' * Loading "of fuel . . . . i . . . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . .'.'. ' '5. 9.E x c e s s , reaictivity. . . . . . ' . . . V. .'. . . . .". . . ' . 2 0. 5 . 1 0 .L o w - p o w e r testing " . * . . . . . . . . . i . . . V.'.'.215. 11'.'' P o w e r t e s t s.'.:.::.'.22

6.Normal start-up6.1.P u r p o s e of s t a r t - u p p r o c e d u r e6.2.Responsible person6.3.T r i p points'.:. 6.4.L o w - l e v e l instrumentation6. 5.P r e d i c t i o n of c r i t i c a l position of r o d s6. 6.Withdrawal of r o d s6.7.P o i s o n i n g and reactivity balance6. 8.A c t i o n if c r i t i c a l i t y i s not a c h i e v e d6. 9.Operating e x c e s s reactivity6.10.Maximum e x c e s s reactivity6. 11. P o w e r operation6. 12.Checks f o r a b n o r m a l i t i e s6.13.Checks post start-up . . .6.14.Power increases6.15.Changes in s t a r t - u p p r o c e d u r e s7.Start-up following an unscheduled shut-down8.N o r m a l operation8. 1.Routine r e c o r d s.8.2. ' Abnormal behaviour'''8. 3.D e g r e e of s u r v e i l l a n c e.'8.4.Unusual o p e r a t i o n s .8. 5.Interpretation of a b n o r m a l behaviour8.6.Working rate9.Shut-down o p e r a t i o n s . . . . . . . . . . . . .9.1.G e n e r a l safety c o n s i d e r a t i o n s9. 2.S u r v e i l l a n c e of a shut-down r e a c t o r9. 3.P o s i t i o n of c o n t r o l r o d s during shut-down9.4.C o n s i d e r a t i o n s of ' i n s e r t e d - r o d 1 p r o c e d u r e9. 5.C o n s i d e r a t i o n s of ' c o c k e d - r o d 1 p r o c e d u r e10. Maintenance10. 1. G e n e r a l r e q u i r e m e n t s10.2.Drawings,10.3.Basic rules11. F u e l handling and fuelling11.1.Loading f u e l into the c o r e11.2.L o w - l e v e l instrumentation during f u e l movement11.3.F l u x - t r a p loading11. 4. Moving c o n t r o l r o d s 11. 5. Use of hoist11.6.Safety of s t o r e d f u e l . . .12. A c c i d e n t a l f u e l m e l t - d o w n s12.1.General procedure12.2.Clean-up1,2.3. S u r f a c e contamination12.4.Additional p r e c a u t i o n s. 12.5.G a s e o u s contamination.'12. 6. S o m e p r o b l e m s encountered during a fuel meltingincident'.2222232323232323:2424; 2424252525252626.".26'27272727.27. 28282829293031323232 23333331 . 3434'34353535363636r. 36

12.7.12.8.L e s s o n s l e a r n e d f r o m the incidentR e l a t i o n to p o o l r e a c t o r sP r o c e d u r e s f o r s t o r i n g and t r a n s f e r r i n g radioactivematerial14. Safety p r o g r a m m e14.1.General,; . 14.2.Safety c o m m i t t e e s14. 3. Safety r e v i e w of a new r e a c t o ri;1 4 . 4 . A s s e s s m e n t of changes14. 5. . Safeguarding against t a m p e r i n g with equipment14.6.Radiation and contamination c o n t r o l14.7.Contamination14. 8. Radiation and contamination incidents15. E m e r g e n c i e s15.1.Initial p r o b l e m s15.2. Emergency procedures15.3. Personnel exposure16. P r o c e d u r e s 1 6 . 1 . Written p r o c e d u r e s16.2.Changes.16.3.Standard method and f o r m a t16.4.Temporary procedures16.5.L i s t of n e c e s s a r y p r o c e d u r e s17. R e c o r d s'.17.1.Master copies18. S e r v i c e s18.1.Radiochemical laboratory18.2.Dosimetry18.3.Health-physics services18.4.E l e c t r i c a l and m e c h a n i c a l shops-. .404013.P A R T II. E X P E R I M E N T S19. Initial planning f o r e x p e r i m e n t s.:20. Safety evaluation of e x p e r i m e n t s 2 0 . 1 . . H a z a r d s due to f a i l u r e of c o m p o n e n t s20. 2. Radiation and contamination h a z a r d s20.3.Materials p r o b l e m s20. 4. Safety d e v i c e s20.5.C o m m o n h a z a r d s of e x p e r i m e n t s20.6.E x p e r i m e n t safety during o p e r a t i o n20.7.I n t e r f e r e n c e with r e a c t o r20.8.Manning of e x p e r i m e n t s21. E x p e r i m e n t o p e r a t i o n21.1.R e s p o n s i b i l i t y of o p e r a t i o n s group f o r utilization ofthe r e a c t o r2 1 . 2 . Safety c r i t e r i a21.3. P r e f e r r e d components2 1 . 4 . E x p e r i m e n t s with f i s s i o n a b l e m a t e r i a l21. 5. Double 6

22.21.6. Experiment information.21.7. Experiment emergency procedures . . . . . , . . .R e a c t o r - p h y s i c s c o n s i d e r a t i o n s encountered withexperiments. . 67676823.Experiment facilities .'.6923.1.Beam holes.:. " 70'-'23. 2. T h r o u g h - h o l e s 7023.3.Vertical experiments70.23.4.H y d r a u l i c - and p n e u m a t i c - c a p s u l e f a c i l i t i e s . . . . . . . . .7123.5.Critical facilities. 722 3 . 6 . P o o l irradiation/facilities.v.7323. 7. T h e r m a l c o l u m n s ' ; . . . . . - . . . . . . .'.'.' . . . . . ' . . . ;7323.8.Shielding f a c i l i t y . '. 7323.9.Mock-upi.742 3 . 1 0 . Building a r r a n g e m e n t and equipment r e q u i r e d .'7424. P r e c a u t i o n s in the use of m a t e r i a l s 7724.1.Compatibility of m a t e r i a l.;7724.2.C o r r o s i o n of aluminium. . . .79'24.3.C o r r o s i o n of c o n s t r u c t i o n a l m a t e r i a li80P A R T III. F U N C T I O N A L REQUIREMENTS OF R E A C T O RSYSTEMS- 25. G o r e d e s i g n c o n s i d e r a t i o n s126. F u e l.'26. 1. Choice of element weight f o r new r e a c t o r26.2.C o m m e n t s on f u e l element p r o c u r e m e n t and:. specifications27. C o n t r o l r o d s;.;. ' 27. 1. Reliability27.2.Testing27.3.Control-rod worth. ;.''27.4.Value of individual r o d s: 27.5.Rate of r o d withdrawal.27.6.Material p r o b l e m s.'27.7.Release mechanism'27.8.Control-rod drives27.9.Seat s w i t c h . . . . . . . . .28. Instrumentation.'28.1.G e n e r a l c r i t e r i a applicable to r e a c t o rinstrumentation . . . . . . ' . .' .28. 2. Safety instrumentation— .28.3.Sensitivity to f u e l m o v e m e n t . . ' . . . .:28.4.Redundancy.-.: 28.5.C o i n c i d e n c e v e r s u s redundant channels . . . . . . . . . . .28.6.Block-outs . ' . . . . . ; . :«.'. 28.7.Gamma chambers :.'.28. 8. F i s s i o n - p r o d u c t m o n i t o r28.9.L o c k i n g of c o n t r o l r o d s".'28.10. Excess reactivity'controlled'by-automatic.system . . . . . . 9797

2 8 . 1 1 . Relationship of the r e a c t o r o p e r a t o r s to theinstrumentation"28. 12. T e s t i n g.'.72 8 . 1 3 . E x p e r i m e n t instrumentation.". . .28. 14. M o d i f i c a t i o n s to instrumentation,' .2 8 . 1 5 . M i n i m u m safety c o n t r o l instrument channels ' ,."29. R e a c t o r v e s s e l . . . . . . . . . .'/. . . . . ".29.1.Lattice . . . . ' . . . . . ' . . .'.;.29.2.Gas r e l e a s e f r o m e x p e r i m e n t s,,29.3.Venting.:'.'.'29.4.Window'29.5.Trash collection.,,30. R e a c t o r p o o l s'.'V.30.1.Lighting.'.'„30.2.Cleaning.'.:",; 30. 3: L i n e r s7:;30.4.Unlined p o o l s . .3 0 . 5 . A c c e s s through walls . . . . . . . . ' .,30.6.Draining o f ' p o o l''.'.30.7.Storage r a c k s., , 3 0 . 8 .Gates and p l a t f o r m s. . . . . . . . . .30.9.E f f e c t on building ventilation . .'.31. W a t e r s y s t e m.31.1'. W a t e r purity'.'.'. : 31.2.Maintaining water purity.;:. :" : 3 1 . 3 .Degasifier.:.:.31.4.P r o v i s i o n f o r sampling and analysing r e a c t o r w a t e r . . .: 31.5.Monitoring.'31.6.Corrosion.V.j ::;31.7.R a d i o i s o t o p e s c o m m o n l y found in r e s e a r c h - r e a c t o rwater s y s t e m s . . . . . . ' . - . . . ' . . : . ; . .:.:.' .31.8.Algae.31. 9. Radiolytic gasJ-.-. '32'. E m e r g e n c y c o o l i n g 32.1.Need f o r e m e r g e n c y cooling- . . . . . . . . ."C3 2 . 2 . Auxiliary c o o l i n g d e v i c e s . . . . ; : . . ; . . . . . . . ; . . . : . . . . . . .33'. R e a c t o r , building3 3 . 1 . A r r a n g e m e n t of r e a c t o r building".33.2.Decontamination f a c i l i t y —,.33. 3 . . Space. ' ' 3 3 . 4 . . F l o o r loading capacity; .;.''33.5.Clothes-changing facilities33.6.Provisions for emergencies.: .33.7.Visitors.,.'3 3 . 8 . A i r conditioning.;.33.9.Hoist.'.;.i33.10. Exposed surfaces1. 33.11. Drains.1.3 3 . 1 2 . W i r i n g f r o m e x p e r i m e n t s to the c o n t r o l r o o m979898' 114114115115115115116116116116

34.35.36.37.38.Ventilation and containment3 4 . 1 . Ventilation . .34.2.Dynamic containmentUtilities.35.1. Electrical power35.2.Emergency power3 5 . 3 . P o t a b l e , p r o c e s s and d e m i n e r a l i z e d water35.4. Air35.5.CommunicationsTools36.1.Storage36.2.Weight of t o o l s36. 3.Use of t o o l s with hoistShielded c a r r i e r sHot c e l l s38.1. Accessibility3 8 . 2 . Separation38.3.Ventilation38.4.Cell i n t e r i o r117H7118H9119. 120121122122122123123123123125125125126126.'.,. XV.Outline of a training c o u r s e in r e a c t o r operationsO R R s t a r t - u p c h e c k list;P r e - s t a r t u p O R R instrument c h e c k s .:.O R R hourly r e a d i n g sDaily operating conditions ( p o w e r d i a g r a m )O R R accumulated instrument p o w e rP o w e r changes and a c c u m u l a t e d energyO R R daily s u m m a r y8 - 4 shift ORR d a i l y . c h e c k sheet .4 - 1 2 shift O R R daily check sheet12-4 shift ORR daily check sheet . . ;ORR daily water s y s t e m c h e c k sDaily routing instrument c h e c k listORR weekly c h e c k s . . .'Sample schedule (in; out)O R R weekly r e p o r tO R R shutdown schedule;O R R shutdown w o r k scheduleO R R shutdown c h e c k listORR m e c h a n i c a l maintenance r e c o r dFuel transfer m em o Shim rod r e m o v a l c h e c k list. Shim rod i n s e r t i o n check listT o o l and equipment check list f o r ORR i n - p o o l workCurrent p e r s o n n e l e x p o s u r e r e c o r dRadiation work p e r m i t :

XXVI.XXVII.XXVIII.XXIX.XXX.BackgroundAir sampleExperimentExperimentExperimentsurveyand s m e a r contamination datar e v i e w questionnaireinformation f o r shift s u p e r v i s o r sstatus change request177179180192194

INTRODUCTIONThis manual is meant to p r o v i d e g e n e r a l ' i n f o r m a t i o n on the s a f e t y ,o p e r a t i o n and f u n c t i o n a l r e q u i r e m e n t s of a ' n u m b e r of s y s t e m s p e r t a i n i n gto r e a c t o r o p e r a t i o n . B e c a u s e d i f f e r e n t f a c i l i t i e s v a r y w i d e l y in d e s i g n ,it i s not p r a c t i c a l to be t o o s p e c i f i c c o n c e r n i n g c r i t e r i a o r d e s i g n d e t a i l s .T h e r e f o r e an attempt has b e e n m a d e to l i m i t the c r i t e r i a to the f u n c t i o n sw h i c h the s y s t e m s m u s t p e r f o r m and to g e n e r a l p r o b l e m s of s a f e t y . .A number of examples are given of s p e c i f i c s y s t e m s or- situations generally a s s o c i a t e d with l i g h t - w a t e r m o d e r a t e d and c o o l e d r e a c t o r s . It i shoped that the v a r i o u s s a f e t y and operating p r o b l e m s d e s c r i b e d ' w i l l : enablethe operating staff to v i s u a l i z e not only s i m i l a r situations but e n t i r e l y d i f f e r e n t ones which have not been f o r e s e e n . 'One of the m o s t useful m e s s a g e s which this manual can c o n v e y is that,since e v e r y situation cannot-always be f o r e s e e n - i n the design ;and in-the p r o c e d u r e s initially d e v e l o p e d , the operating staff must b e ' c o n s t a n t l y vigilantf o r new p r o b l e m s b r o u g h t on by c h a n g e s in f u e l l o a d i n g , f i s s i o n - p r o d u c tb u i l d - u p , changes in flux p a t t e r n , ' changes in e x p e r i m e n t s , o r a'multitudeof other f a c t o r s , any of which m a y unexpectedly c o n f r o n t the o p e r a t o r witha new,' and s o m e t i m e s unpleasant, situation.'.' .« » W h i l e a ' n u m b e r of d e s i r a b l e d e s i g n ' f e a t u r e s a r e l i s t e d f o r a r e a c t o rand i t s v a r i o u s s y s t e m s , it should be pointed out that p r o b a b l y no' r e a c t o rin e x i s t e n c e i n c l u d e s all the f e a t u r e s d i s c u s s e d . It i s a l w a y s p o s s i b l e tosuggest i m p r o v e m e n t s in the design of any r e a c t o r and the r e a c t o r managershould not n e c e s s a r i l y change his r e a c t o r to c o n f o r m with all the f e a t u r e sl i s t e d s i n c e m o s t r e a c t o r s are s u c c e s s f u l l y operated without many of these.It i s h o p e d , h o w e v e r , that this manual, in pointing out d e s i r a b l e f e a t u r e s ,will cause the r e a c t o r manager and s u p e r v i s o r s to appreciate wherein theirr e a c t o r i s s u p e r i o r o r i n f e r i o r and to p r o v i d e e f f e c t i v e s a f e g u a r d s againstany d e f i c i e n c y in design o r equipment by i n c r e a s i n g administrative c o n t r o l ,if n e c e s s a r y at the expense of s o m e limitation on o p e r a t i o n s .In c o n s i d e r i n g the n e c e s s i t y of making changes in a r e a c t o r which hasalready been built, the r e a c t o r manager should c o n s i d e r whether a d m i n i s t r a t i v e c o n t r o l c a n m a k e up f o r any d e f i c i e n c y of d e s i g n . It i s p r o b a b l ytrue that a w e l l - m a n a g e d , p o o r l y - d e s i g n e d r e a c t o r can b e o p e r a t e d m u c hm o r e s a f e l y than a w e l l - d e s i g n e d , p o o r l y - m a n a g e d r e a c t o r .It is not c l a i m e d that the c r i t e r i a given are p e r f e c t , but e v e r y r e a c t o rmanager should be c o n v i n c e d that his r e a c t o r either m e e t s these standardsthrough i n h e r e n t s a f e t y , d e s i g n e d s a f e t y , and a d m i n i s t r a t i v e p r o c e d u r e so r that the s t a n d a r d i s i n c o r r e c t o r m o r e r i g o r o u s than n e c e s s a r y .ScopeT h i s manual i s d i r e c t e d m a i n l y toward r e s e a r c h and testing r e a c t o r swith e m p h a s i s on those that a r e l i g h t - w a t e r m o d e r a t e d and c o o l e d . An attempt has b e e n m a d e to i n c l u d e m o s t of the f i e l d s e n c o u n t e r e d in r e a c t o roperations, together with c o m m e n t s on design, the start-up of new r e a c t o r s ,p r o b l e m s with e x p e r i m e n t s , p r o c e d u r e s (both n o r m a l and e m e r g e n c y ) andthe training and q u a l i f i c a t i o n of p e r s o n n e l .1

2INTRODUCTIONNo attempt is made to c o n s i d e r all items which are normally consideredin design, nor is this manual intended to outline a safety analysis of the typen o r m a l l y p e r f o r m e d on a new r e a c t o r . The approach to the subject has beenf r o m the operational aspect, to make available to operators s o m e experienceof s h o r t c o m i n g s in d e s i g n that have not b e e n o b v i o u s until a f t e r e x t e n d e doperation.LimitationT h e p r o c e d u r e s and c r i t e r i a outlined in this manual should not be r e g a r d e d as binding; instead, they should be t r e a t e d as r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s tobe c o n s i d e r e d and accepted o r r e j e c t e d , part by part, a c c o r d i n g to whetherthey pertain to the s y s t e m in question or whether the probability of any p a r t i c u l a r a c c i d e n t o c c u r r i n g in the s u b j e c t s y s t e m is high enough to w a r r a n tconsideration.Since r e s e a r c h r e a c t o r s have s o m a n y d i f f e r e n t d e s i g n s and a r e s u b j e c t to the influence of w i d e l y d i f f e r e n t t e c h n i c a l b a c k g r o u n d s , it would bep r e s u m p t u o u s to attempt to d i s c u s s in d e t a i l the s a f e t y c o n s i d e r a t i o n s o fall the various types, even if the author w e r e sufficiently familiar with them.H o w e v e r , m a n y p r o b l e m s a r e c o m m o n to all r e a c t o r s and r e a c t o r s t a f f sshould attempt-to p r o j e c t the examples given in this manual to their system,even though the e x a m p l e s m a y not apply d i r e c t l y b e c a u s e of the d i f f e r e n c ein d e s i g n .

PART I. OPERATION1.BASIC CONSIDERATIONSThe b a s i c m i s s i o n of the operating staff of a nuclear r e s e a r c h r e a c t o ri s , of c o u r s e , to o p e r a t e the r e a c t o r s a f e l y and e f f i c i e n t l y and to p r o v i d ee x p e r i m e n t f a c i l i t i e s f o r v a r i o u s r e s e a r c h p r o g r a m m e s . In achieving thisr a t h e r s i m p l e o b j e c t i v e , a s k i l l e d staff and m u c h planning and hard w o r ka r e r e q u i r e d . The m a n a g e r must train and qualify his s t a f f , p r e p a r e p r o c e d u r e s , plan f o r initial and routine operation and above all ensure the overalls a f e t y during ali the v a r i o u s c o n d i t i o n s l i k e l y to b e e n c o u n t e r e d in o p e r ation, shut-down, s t a r t - u p , maintenance, o r any other n o r m a l or e m e r g e n c ysituation.While technical skills are generally considered to be the m o s t importantattribute-of the operating s t a f f , o r g a n i z a t i o n a l s k i l l s a r e a l s o v e r y n e c e s s a r y . The training of the staff must not be t o o c o n c e n t r a t e d in t h e o r y , butm u s t b e h e a v i l y s u p p l e m e n t e d with p r a c t i c a l e x p e r i e n c e . S t a n d a r d s f o rqualifying the staff f o r each position should be established and the operatingstaff o r g a n i z a t i o n should define the e x t e n t ' o f e a c h p e r s o n ' s r e s p o n s i b i l i t yfor decisions s o that the proper level of technical competence may be broughtto bear on a p r o b l e m .The s p e c i f i c h a z a r d s of r e a c t o r o p e r a t i o n , i . e . c r i t i c a l i t y , radiationand c o n t a m i n a t i o n , a r e not e n c o u n t e r e d in o t h e r f i e l d s and m u s t be c a r e fully c o n s i d e r e d . W h e r e n e c e s s a r y , a d m i n i s t r a t i v e s a f e t y in the f o r m oftraining, p r o c e d u r e s , r u l e s , check l i s t s etc. should be added to the n o r m a lsafety d e v i c e s designed as part of the' r e a c t o r . In specifying these, consideration should be given to the safety of the public a t l a r g e a s well as thatof the staff and the r e a c t o r i t s e l f . E a c h h a z a r d m u s t b e c l e a r l y s e t f o r t hand emphasized in the training p r o g r a m m e ' s o that the staff understands ther e a s o n f o r the safety d e v i c e s and administrative c o n t r o l s .Since safety d e v i c e s play such an important r o l e in r e a c t o r s ' a n d in s o m etypes of e x p e r i m e n t s , c a r e f u l p r o c e d u r e s must be followed f o r establishingthe r e l i a b i l i t y of these at appropriate i n t e r v a l s . Safety d e v i c e s cannot p r o v i d e p r o t e c t i o n in e v e r y c o n c e i v a b l e situation and these situations m u s t bec l e a r l y r e c o g n i z e d s o that additional administrative s a f e t y ' m a y be provided.B e c a u s e it is usually n e c e s s a r y to change or supplement the p r o c e d u r e sadopted with a hew r e a c t o r , c a r e must be e x e r c i s e d to ensure that the p r o c e d u r e s a r e c o m p l e t e , p r o p e r l y a u t h o r i z e d and r e a d i l y a c c e s s i b l e to thestaff. If a r i g i d s y s t e m i s not f o l l o w e d when changing p r o c e d u r e s , it m a yeventually be d i f f i c u l t to d e t e r m i n e what the approved p r o c e d u r e s actuallyare.' ' ''During the initial start-up a long s e r i e s of tests must be p e r f o r m e d whicha r e ' d e s i g n e d t o p r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n f o r the s u b s e q u e n t s a f e o p e r a t i o n o fthe r e a c t o r and e x p e r i m e n t s . T e s t p r o c e d u r e s f o r the r e a c t o r and its auxil i a r y s y s t e m s must be developed and operating and maintenance p r o c e d u r e sand c h e c k l i s t s m u s t b e f o r m u l a t e d . A f t e r the initial s t a r t - u p and testingp e r i o d , the e m p h a s i s usually shifts to the task of keeping the r e a c t o r o p e r ating s a f e l y and e f f i c i e n t l y . W h i l e it i s s o m e t i m e s a s s u m e d that r o u t i n e3

4PARTI."OPERATIONoperation of a r e a c t o r is v e r y simple, this is by no means the c a s e .P r o c e d u r e s must be changed as e x p e r i e n c e i n d i c a t e s f l a w s in the o r i g i n a lones or as equipment is changed. The qualification and training of the o p e r ating staff must be maintained, changes in the r e a c t o r and new experimentsr e q u i r e safety evaluations, functional t e s t s must be c a r r i e d out at r e g u l a ri n t e r v a l s t o guarantee the s a f e t y o f the f a c i l i t y and a m y r i a d of other p r o b l e m s m u s t be s o l v e d .The manager of a routinely operating r e a l t o r must b e c o m e familiar withthe p r o b l e m s of the e x p e r i m e n t e r s and other groups utilizing the r e a c t o r ino r d e r to i n c r e a s e the u s e f u l n e s s of his f a c i l i t y . He c a n do this in m a n yw a y s , s u c h as e s t a b l i s h i n g standards f o r the d e s i g n of e x p e r i m e n t s ; p r o viding consultation f o r groups wishing to do experiments in the r e a c t o r ; andmaintaining s e r v i c e s which f o s t e r utilization. Such s e r v i c e s include r a d i o i s o t o p e p r o d u c t i o n and a s s a y , c o n s u l t a t i o n on u s a g e of r a d i o i s o t o p e s anddesign of e x p e r i m e n t s , and d o s i m e t r y m e a s u r e m e n t s which provide e x p e r i m e n t e r s with the.value of fast and thermal neutron fluxes and gamma heatingin many locations in the r e a c t o r .T h i s l i s t i s b y no m e a n s c o m p l e t e and the v a r i o u s p r o b l e m s i n v o l v e din r e a c t o r o p e r a t i o n w i l l be d i s c u s s e d f u r t h e r in the f o l l o w i n g s e c t i o n .2.2.1.S T A F F ORGANIZATIONTypicalorganizationchartA typical organization chart is shown (Fig. 1), based upon a s m a l l r e a c t o r o p e r a t i n g continuously and having a f a i r l y c o m p l e t e and independento r g a n i z a t i o n . No o r g a n i

will be in operation throughout the world, the IAEA has devoted special at-tention to the problems associated with their operation and efficient utili-zation. This interest has resulted in the publicatio in 196n b0y o thf e IAEA a small manual on the "Safe Operation of Cri

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

10 tips och tricks för att lyckas med ert sap-projekt 20 SAPSANYTT 2/2015 De flesta projektledare känner säkert till Cobb’s paradox. Martin Cobb verkade som CIO för sekretariatet för Treasury Board of Canada 1995 då han ställde frågan