Human Security - United Nations Development Programme

2y ago
15 Views
3 Downloads
752.69 KB
16 Pages
Last View : 25d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Aarya Seiber
Transcription

United Nations Development ProgrammeHuman Development Report OfficeThis note should be read inconjunction with the Regional/National Human DevelopmentReport Toolkit.While the toolkit provides generalguidance on preparing a Regionalor National Human DevelopmentReport, this note gives specificsuggestions on how to approachthe concept of human security asa topic for such a report.Human SecurityA Thematic Guidance Note forRegional and National HumanDevelopment Report TeamsBY OSCAR A. GÓMEZ AND DES GASPERContentsWhat is Human Security?. 2Getting Started. 4Selecting objectives and themes. 4The process. 6Preparing the Report. 7General considerations. 71. Conceptualize the theme: build aconceptual framework. 72. Integration with human development. 8Many important aspects of human developmentrelate also to people’s security: loosely definedas people’s freedom from fear and freedom fromwant in a broad sense. Applying a human securityapproach offers an opportunity to analyse manyissues in an informative way. This note explains howone might go about doing that.Human security relates to much more than security from violence and crime. A report team wantingto look at the security of people’s livelihoods (economic, food, environment or health security) mightapply a human security approach. Human securitycan also be used to look into personal, communityand political security. Indeed, human developmentreports from around the world have applied theapproach in other innovative ways. But on eachoccasion, these reports have analysed a threat, orgroups of threats, and how they affect particulargroups of people.3. Data mapping. 8Potential areas of analysis.101. Comprehensive-mapping reports. 102. State-building reports. 103. Citizen security reports. 124. (Lead) Challenge-driven reports. 13Resources. 15And so if one is interested in preparing a humandevelopment report that is focused on one or more ofthe threats people face, then a human security approachis worth considering. This note explains how such anapproach could help, and how it might be applied.

What is HumanSecurity?The 1994 HDR was more specific, listingseven essential dimensions of human security:The human security approach was introducedin the 1994 global Human Development Report(HDR), which led to a range of literature andinitiatives building on the idea (some of theseare mentioned in the annex to this guidancenote), and to a series of discussions in the UnitedNations. In 2012 the General Assembly (GA)adopted a common definition of the concept.1 EconomicHealthPersonalPolitical Food Environmental CommunityThis list is neither comprehensive nor definitive, and the UN Charter refers more flexibly to‘fundamental freedoms’. National and regionalHDRs aiming to address varying categories ofthreats and values can use the human securityapproach in analyzing the topic. Previous reportsbased on the human security approach have, forexample, dealt with social exclusion, modernization and climate change; they have used exampleswhere the State has been a threat; or exploredpossible future threats. Human security is a flexible approach and can be tailored to differentcontexts and topics, according to the specificcontext. No matter which topic is addressed, aguiding principle of the human security approachis that it requires understanding the particularthreats experienced by particular groups of people, as well as the participation of those people inthe analysis process. Threats to human securitycan exist at all levels of development. They canemerge slowly and silently or appear suddenlyand dramatically.The human security approach broadens thescope of security analysis and policy from territorial security to the security of people. The 2012GA Resolution stresses the role of “MemberStates in identifying and addressing widespreadand cross-cutting challenges to survival, livelihood and dignity of their people”. In otherwords, threat(s) to – and values under threatin – people’s lives are the key starting point of ahuman security report.The 1994 HDR highlighted two major components of human security: ‘freedom from fear’and ‘freedom from want’. These freedoms,from the preamble to the Universal Declarationof Human Rights, are part of the four humanfreedoms that President Franklin D. Rooseveltfamously referred to in a speech in 1941. Hewas advocating a world founded on: freedomof speech and expression, freedom of worship,freedom from want and freedom from fear.2Subsequent debate in the 1990s added the freedom ‘to live in dignity’.Central to the approach is the idea that peoplehave ‘the right to live in freedom and dignity, freefrom poverty and despair with an equal opportunity to enjoy all their rights and fully developtheir human potential.’31UN General Assembly, 66th Session “Follow-upto paragraph 143 on human security of the 2005 WorldSummit Outcome” (A/RES/66/290), 25 October 2012.2Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s address to the UnitedStates Congress, January 6 1941, chapter 36. See book/ralprs36b.htm3UN General Assembly, 66th Session “Follow-upto paragraph 143 on human security of the 2005 WorldSummit Outcome” (A/RES/66/290). 25 October 20122

At the end of 2012, some 45 HumanDevelopment Reports in the HDRO database discussed human security in differentways. Around a third of these discuss theconcept explicitly and this guidance notedraws mainly on these latter reports. Itsynthesizes insights from these reports anddraws on their lessons for developing an R/NHDR on different threats, using the humansecurity approach. It is complemented withinsights from the wider literature on humansecurity analysis.Overall, this guidance note will guideR/NHDR teams through the report writingprocess, not least by clarifying the humansecurity concept, how it relates to humandevelopment and how it can help in structuring a report on a certain threat, such asenvironmental insecurity, food insecurity orviolence and crime. It will help report teams indeciding the approach for an R/NHDR, usingthe human security approach. The note and itsbackground material provide ample referenceto previous reports on specific subjects thatwill be helpful.Country Offices (COs) considering thehuman security approach should bear in mindtwo points at the outset: Not only reports on violence can use thehuman security approach. As we explainin the following section, there are at leastfour common types of human securityreports and COs are free to choose (andadapt) the type of approach that helpsthem the most. The concept does not only apply to fragilestates. Security, in the broad sense, is important for all societies. The human securityapproach is flexible and can be tailored todifferent countries.Human Development and Human Security:How Do They Differ?Human development and human security areinterlinked but are by no means identical. Humandevelopment is a broad concept, aiming at enlarging people’s choices and freedoms. Human security is about assuring priority freedoms so that‘people can exercise choices safely and freely’(HDR 1994, page 23) and can be confident thatthe opportunities they have are protected.Some elements of the 2012 GA resolutionshow the links between human security andhuman development and help with the conception of a human security report:“Human security calls for people-centred, comprehensive, context-specific and preventionoriented responses ”. The first three elementsare shared with human development, althoughhuman security analysis is focused on threats; thelast element implies understanding the threats inorder to implement preventive measures;“ that strengthen the protection and empowerment of all people and all communities” – humansecurity analysis considers multiple providers ofsecurity, including citizens themselves. Humansecurity analysis explores using both empowerment and protection to tackle specific threats topeople’s lives, and empowerment especially linksclosely with human development.“Human security recognizes the interlinkagesbetween peace, development and human rights,and equally considers civil, political, economic,social and cultural rights;” – thus human security forms part of the family of human concepts(including human rights, human needs, humandevelopment).“Human security is based on national ownership.”This is also a necessary standard that all NHDRsshould meet.”3

Getting StartedSELECTING OBJECTIVESAND THEMESa multi-issues report. This list offers a startingpoint for discussing the focus and theme of an R/NHDR on human security:An important initial question is whether thereport should make a comprehensive review ofthe values under threat (usually presented as alist of securities) and the specific threats; or focuson one issue of special interest. Experience showsthat both approaches are useful and have different applications.1. Comprehensive mapping reports try tocover major threats to all priority values, putthem in perspective, and offer ideas on agendas for action.2. State-building reports see state collapse/failure as the greatest threat to human security,and so focus on building a state.3. ‘Citizen Security’ reports focus on a subset ofcivil rights that is often of particular concernin the daily lives of citizens, notably physicalsafety and freedom from unlawful dispossession. Such reports could also be called citizensafety reports, but the name ‘citizen security’has become more common for this set ofconcerns.Multi-issue reports can: Map the situation of the country or region, andhelp identify an agenda for action (part of whichmay eventually become the theme for a futureHDR). Explore differences between perceived insecurities and documented threats, within andacross different groups and different issues.4. Special-focus reports, centered on key challenges other than state-building or violence andcrime, focus on some other single threatenedvalue or type of threat, e.g. food insecurity orclimate change. For ease of reference, we herecall them ‘Challenge-driven’ or, since the othertypes of report also respond to challenges, ‘Leadchallenge driven’. Provide the basis for a future in-depth exploration of priority threats. Analyse issues that may become threats in thefuture, including climate change. Promote improvement in a nation’s humansecurity related statistics.Single-issue reports can: Raise awareness and motivate action onthreats that are not yet widely recognized, butwhere evidence suggests they need to be takenseriously.There is more to the report conception stage,however, than simply deciding which of thesefour styles of report to use. The human securityapproach can be used flexibly; the many threatsoffer many options for analysis, and so the country context should be assessed very carefully foreach report. Some basic questions can help brainstorming during the report conception phase:Based on existing experience in R/NHDRs, wehave divided all reports dealing with humansecurity into four main groups. The last three aretypes of single-issue reports whereas the first is Whose security? Human security work focuseson the security of people. Particular reportsmay focus on certain target (i.e. vulnerable) Offer in-depth analysis on selected threats (orvalues under threat).4

groups, but should explain their selectioncriteria.Institutional consolidation, often emphasisedin state-building and citizen security reports, ismost relevant when: Security of what? What values are in needof protection? The human security approachconsiders the ‘survival, livelihood and dignity’ of individuals. The 1994 HDR list ofseven areas of security offers examples ofimportant values, but it is up to teams to tailor their selection of values according to thecontext of the study. Institutions for a particular issue alreadyexist, but need to be strengthened (and offergood possibilities for strengthening). The relation between particular institutionsand the issue is very close.Institutional innovation, most relevant when: Security from what? What threats are mostrelevant at a particular time and place? Onemust also decide on the number of issues to beincluded and how they interrelate. Consideras well the perception of threats compared totheir actual occurrence. The issue is an emerging challenge requiringnew institutional approaches. The report would like to explore the rolesof different stakeholders in the provision ofsecurity. Who can play a role? While recognizing thestate’s primary role, many actors can andshould play a part, including individuals,businesses, communities and internationalorganisations. The present approach to the issues wouldbenefit from a far-reaching reinterpretation.Some additional considerations in choosing theoverall approach are: What means for promoting human securitycan be used? While some common tools/strategies are suggested (e.g. the principles ofbeing comprehensive, contextual, participatory, and preventive), reports should be creative, innovative, and differentiate accordingto the context. Degree of structural ownership: if nationalstakeholders are well accustomed to the production of R/NHDRs, it can be easier to dealwith sensitive issues. Precedents: previous reports could haveopened the opportunity to follow-up in depthon certain issues. Target levels – are there examples of too littleor too much (human) security? One shouldpreferably use some form of cost-benefit analysis to explore trade-offs implicit in focusingon one threat rather than another, and on onetype of response compared to another (Jollyand Basu Ray 2006). Timeliness: forthcoming events can determine the focus—e.g., approaching the end ofthe MDG period can trigger a comprehensivemapping report to explore how to set thepost-2015 agenda. COs, especially if preparing their first humansecurity report, may wish to include issuesalready conventionally recognized as ‘security’ matters, in order to show the valueadded by also broadening the meaning of‘security’ beyond these conventional topics.Another consideration at this stage is whetherto focus primarily on institutional consolidationor institutional innovation. These approachesare not exclusive, but the choice will have animpact on many aspects of the report. The decision to favor one over the other is usually justified by one or more of the following reasons.5

Match the budget and the methodologyselected. Different types of reports have different budget requirements. Comprehensivemapping reports and those including elaborate surveys are more expensive.THE PROCESSThe key steps in the process for preparing everyR/NHDR apply here (see Section 2 in the R/NHDR toolkit). But adopting a human securityfocus also requires highlighting the followingaspects. Consider the need to train people in humansecurity analysis, particularly if it is new tothe country, and ensure there is a range ofdifferent skills and perspectives present in thereport team. The team should reflect the transdisciplinary nature of human security. Build strong partnerships throughout thewhole report process. The process of preparingan R/NHDR depends on established partnersand new strategic ones, the choice of whichshould vary according to the type of humansecurity report and issues selected. The background papers are the backbone ofthe report, and thus it is crucial that agreement on all the basic questions about the perspective of the study has been reached and isreflected in the terms of reference for commissioned work. Broad consultations around strategic choicesare important in order to decide an approachand framework. As human security reports aretailored to the context, and the choices takenmust take into account sensitivities aroundthe issues discussed, involving all stakeholders is important. The consultations could startby asking what human security means in thisspecific country at this time.4 The final report can be greatly improvedthrough extensive peer review, throughout thecourse of the project that gathers feedback onconceptual, statistical and political issues, etc. A long-term perspective is important. Humansecurity is an exploratory and relatively newapproach, which partly will deliver impactsin the longer term because it can stimulaterethinking and promote new cross-sector linkages. Therefore it is valuable to engage actorsin the process who will reflect on the conceptand have a capacity/willingness to innovateafter they return to their daily roles (e.g. in thepolice, military, or planning offices). Given the novelty of human security reports insome places, it can be useful to identify jointlywith all stakeholders a distinctive profile/rationale for the report, to clarify its specificcontribution to the nation. Involve strategic partners. The choice ofemphasis on institutional change or institutional consolidation has implications forwhich organizations would be of most strategic interest for the report team. A reportfocused on consolidation would seek a closeinteraction with the organizations targeted.One focused on innovation could be catalyzed by the involvement of recognized agentsof change (Such as those seeking changethrough advocacy, investment, buildingknowledge and/or political will). Be sure to nurture the technical networks thatare created around the report process. Thecapacity created is an impact of the report andthose people can go on to champion humansecurity thinking.4As the UN General Assembly Resolution notes,human security is based on national ownership. Sincethe political, economic, social and cultural conditions forhuman security vary significantly across and within countries, and at different points in time, a human securityapproach must strengthen national solutions which arecompatible with local realities.6

Preparing thereportOnce the type of report and process has beendecided, it is time to plan the preparation. Theprocess combines three components: preparing the conceptual framework, planning theapproach to data, and designing and using thevalidation and consultation mechanisms. Thecomponents do not change very much according to the type of human security report, so wepresent them in general terms first, and then offerspecifics for each of the four types of report.Examples include: (1) moving the perception ofan issue from one based on fear to seeing it asalso an opportunity; (2) strengthening the bridgeto human development themes through workingwith the concept of securitability, which concernspeople’s ability to contribute to their own security, the ability to avoid, cope with and overcomesituations of human insecurity5; (3) avoidingunnecessary securitization of issues that could bedealt with through a human needs perspectiveon welfare systems6; (4) and combining humansecurity and human rights perspectives to identify various ways to overcome challenges.GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS Someagreesomecepts1. Conceptualize the theme: build aconceptual framework Agreeing on definitions, terminologies andlanguage – the process for the report conception, composition and refinement will benefitfrom building a general agreement on the definitions, terminologies and language to be used.successful teams have found it useful toon a conceptual map of the report, orother visual representation of the conbehind the report (e.g. Benin NHDR5http://www.lu.lv/fileadmin/user upload/lu portal/projekti/citi projekti/undp2003 ful en.pdf (securitabilityis a concept d

3 UN General Assembly, 66th Session “Follow-up to paragraph 143 on human security of the 2005 World Summit Outcome” (A/RES/66/290). 25 October 2012 What is Human Security? The human security approach was introduced in the 1994 global Human Develop

Related Documents:

UN United Nations UNCCD United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification UNCED United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (‘The Earth Summit’, 1992) UN DESD United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development (2005 2014) UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme

UNFICYP United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organization UNIFIL United Nations Interim Force in the Lebanon UNIKOM United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission UNMOGIP United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan

UN DKPO United Nations Department of Peacekeeping Operations UNAMID African Union/United Nations Hybrid operation in Darfur UNAMSIL United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone . XIV UNEF 1 United Nations Emergency Force in Egypt UNHCR Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees UNISFA

United Nations University Office in North America 2 United Nations Plaza, Room DC2-2062, New York, NY 10017, USA Tel: þ1-212-963-6387 Fax: þ1-212-371-9454 E-mail: unuona@ony.unu.edu United Nations University Press is the publishing division of the United Nations University. Cover design by Joyce C. Weston Photograph by Pacific Press Service .

(ECA), United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pa-cific (ESCAP), United Nations Economic and Social Commission for West Africa (ESCWA), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), United Nations Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UNISDR), United .

Sierra Leone UNOSOM - United Nations Operation in Somalia. UNSC - United Nations Security Council . xv UNSCR - United Nations Security Council Resolution UNTAG - United Nations Transition Assistance Group UNTSO - United Nations Truce Supervision Organisation USA - United States of America .

UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNESCAP United Nations Economic and Social Commissions for Asia and the Pacific UNGA United Nations General Assembly UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund UNSD United Nations Statistics Division WASH water, sanitation and hygiene WTO World Trade Organization

United Nations Nations Unies United Nations Organization Stabilization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo . We strongly recommend all companies to register at least at Level 1 under the United Nations Secretariat prior to participating in any solicitations. . UN post-employment restrictions