Principles Of Effective Design, Layout, And Furnishing Of .

2y ago
7 Views
2 Downloads
2.07 MB
64 Pages
Last View : 21d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Samir Mcswain
Transcription

Principles of EffectiveDesign, Layout, and Furnishingof PACE Day Sites:A Guide for Directors and Developers ofPrograms of All-Inclusive Carefor the ElderlyAuthors: Philip D. Sloane, MD, MPHNicole CollinsElizabeth C. Brawley, IIDA, AAHIDPrepared by the Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchProgram on Aging, Disability, and Long-Term CareAcknowledgement: Special thanks to the staff of the National PACE Association and thedirectors and staff of the 13 PACE sites who participated in this project. This study wassupported in part by a Pioneer Award from the Alzheimer’s Association.1

Table of ContentsTopicPageAbout this Monograph . 3Research Design . 4Description of the Research Sample . 5General Satisfaction with the PACE Centers. 8Design and Function of Key Areas and Features . 10Location . 11Entrance. 14Activity Rooms . 17Kitchen & Dining Areas . 20Clinic & Therapy Areas . 23Toilets & Sinks . 25Shower & Bathing Areas . 27Mobility. 29Staff Offices . 32Hallways & Connections Between Rooms . 35Storage . 37Outdoor Areas. 39Planning PACE Center Construction: . 42For More Information . 45Appendix . 46Appendix A: Director Interview Used in this Study . 47Appendix B: Staff Survey Used in this Study . 55Appendix C: Photographic Record/Comment Sheet Used in this Study . 632

About this MonographThe Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) is a growing provider of servicesfor older persons nationwide. Recently approved for participation as a regular provider in theMedicaid and Medicare programs, PACE provides an attractive and innovative alternative tocare in nursing homes and assisted living facilities. The development of a PACE programrequires considerable organization, planning, and resources; the steps are outlined in detail onthe web site of the National Pace Association (www.npaonline.org).The PACE model of care involves provision of all care, Medicare, and Medicaid servicesthrough a single provider. A major goal of PACE is maintaining frail elderly persons at homewhenever possible, under the belief that this will usually maximize the well-being of the olderperson with chronic care needs and his or her family. PACE serves individuals who are aged55 or older, certified by their state to need nursing home care, able to live safely in thecommunity at the time of enrollment, and reside in a PACE service area.The hub of a PACE program is the PACE day center, a medically-intensive facility thatprovides health services, care coordination, nutrition, activities, family services, andadministrative support all under one roof. The purpose of this monograph is to aid developersof new or remodeled PACE sites by: describing current PACE center design, based on a representative sample of centersacross the nation. providing photographs of existing sites. providing information from current PACE staff on what they feel works well and what couldbe improved, and summarizing the information into recommendations.This report summarizes the information gathered in a survey. In addition, it containsrecommendations from experts in architecture and interior design on applying best practices ofenvironmental design for seniors to the various areas of PACE center design.In developing our recommendations, we worked with several experts in environmental designfor seniors. Laurie Ringaert (Director, Office of Research, School of Public Health, Universityof North Carolina at Chapel Hill) was involved in the design phase of the project. Others whocontributed to our recommendations were Margaret Calkins (President, IDEAS Inc.), DanielCinelli (Managing Principal, Perkins Eastman, Chicago, IL), and J. David Hoglund (Principal,Perkins Eastman, Pittsburgh, PA).Finally, we would like to thank the staff and directors of the participating sites, along withShawn Bloom (President and CEO) and Robert Greenwood (VP of Public Affairs) of theNational PACE Association.To obtain additional copies of this monograph, please contact:Ms. Julia ThorpCecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchProgram on Aging, Disability, and Long-Term Carejulthorp@schsr.unc.edu3

Research DesignA sample of 13 existing PACE sites was surveyed. The sites were selected in consultation withthe National PACE Association to be representative of the range of centers and programs; bydesign, approximately half were in remodeled buildings and half in newly-constructed buildings.All but one site we approached agreed to participate in the survey. The participating sites werelocated in California, Texas, Pennsylvania, Massachusetts, New York, Rhode Island, andColorado.Each participating site provided three types of data: The center director was interviewed by telephone. Directors of all 13 sites wereinterviewed; because two of the participating sites had the same director, a total of 11persons were interviewed to obtain these data. A copy of the director interview form isincluded in this monograph as Appendix A. Each site’s director was mailed a packet of questionnaires with instructions that at least oneof each of the following staff complete a questionnaire: Nurse, Physical Therapist, NursingAssistant, Activities Staff, Volunteer, Transportation Coordinator, and Social Worker.Across the 13 sites, a total of 89 staff responded to the questionnaires. A copy of the staffquestionnaire is included as Appendix B. Each site was mailed a disposable flash camera and an instruction sheet. It was requestedthat a staff member take up to 36 photographs, including: 1 of the front of the building, 1-2of the entrance, 1-2 of the entry area, 1-3 of the activity/dining areas, 2 in the clinic, 2 of thephysical/occupational/rehab areas, 2 of hallways, 2-4 of protected outdoor areas, 10 ofenvironmental features that staff consider especially useful, and 5 of environmental featuresthat do not work well. A copy of the photograph record sheet is included as Appendix C.All sites returned a camera with completed photographs.Interviews, questionnaires, and photo requests asked for information about the site in generaland about the following: Location, Entrance, Activity Rooms, Dining Rooms and Kitchen, Clinicand Therapy Rooms, Mobility, Toilets and Sinks for participants, Bathing Areas for participants,Hallways, Storage, and Outdoor Areas. Measures consisted of ratings and open-endedquestions to collect both quantitative and qualitative data about each area surveyed.Data were entered into a standard database program. Descriptive statistics were computedfor the quantitative data, and the qualitative data were summarized.This report summarizes the information gathered in the survey. It also contains representativephotographs from those taken by PACE site personnel. In addition, it containsrecommendations from experts in architecture and interior design on applying best practices tothe various areas of PACE design.4

Description of the Research SampleA. The PACE SiteTable 1 below displays basic information about the 13 participating PACE sites.Table 1: Characteristics of Participating PACE CentersTypeFreqPercent (%)Purpose-built center538.46Retrofit (remodeled) center861.54Influence when finding site (Retrofit n 8)FreqPercent (%)Economic/cost225.00Physical potential of site450.00Owner’s expectations00.00Other factor00.00Missing225.00Design(Yes)FreqPercent (%)Architect used13100.00Staff meetings used1184.62Another design method861.54MeanStd Dev4.73.3Age of site (in years)6135# Participants served per dayServices provided at center(Yes)FreqPercent (%)Primary Care13100Social Work1185Therapy13100Personal Care13100Nutritional Counseling862Recreational Therapy13100Meals13100Lab tests969Medication1077Spiritual Care538Square Footage (* Some areas combined)MeanStd. 95755

B. The PACE Center DirectorsOur 13 respondent sites had 11 directors (two had two sites each). Table 2 below providessome background information about the directors.Table 2: Characteristics of Participating PACE DirectorsMeanStand Dev.518AgeGenderFreqPercent (%)Male545Female655EducationFreqPercent (%)Some College19Bachelor’s Degree327Graduate Degree764RaceFreqPercent (%)White1091Other196

C. PACE Center StaffWe distributed questionnaires to a variety of staff in each participating PACE site. We had 89respondents. Table 3 provides some information about them.Table 3: Characteristics of Participating PACE StaffMonths of serviceOccupationFreq%MeanStd DevSocial Worker1213.631.321.7Physical s Staff Member1415.956.362.6Nursing Assistant1719.341.839.0Transportation r 6780.7RaceFreq%American Indian/Alaska Native22.5Asian or Pacific Islander33.7Black89.9White5264.2Other race1619.8EducationFreq%thLess than 12 Grade11.2High School1518.1Technical or Trade School78.4Some College1922.9Bachelors Degree1922.9Graduate eStd Dev11.411.910.010.510.312.417.111.87

General Satisfaction with the PACE CentersWe asked administrators and staff a number of questions to find out their general opinion aboutthe building in which they worked. This section displays the results.A. Comments about Layout and SizeTables 4 and 5 display the responses to two general questions about facility layout and size.Table 4: LayoutDirectorCurrent layout of building bestsupports needs.Strongly DisagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly 441143.729.350.017.132549183.226.351.619.0Table 5: Size *Centers with 100 or more squarefeet per participant** (n 4)DirectorStaffTotalCenters with less than 100 squarefeet per participant (n 6)DirectorStaffTotalCurrent sizeof rooms isFreq%Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%Freq%adequate 5.324.6Agree*3 centers did not report square footage in participant spaces and were not included in this analysis.**The National PACE Association recommends planning for at least 100 square feet per participant in somecombination of activity, dining, and social spaces. Square footage per participant in this analysis was computedby adding dining room, activity space, rehabilitation, and other social spaces such as game room and sunroomsquare footage, and then dividing by average daily census.8

B. Comments about Specific Aspects of the BuildingsTable 6 displays results of questions we asked about some specific aspects of the PACEcenters in which respondents worked. One question asked them to rate an aspect of thecenter on a scale ranging from 0 ( Worst Possible) to 10 ( Best Possible). The other questionasked respondents to rate their satisfaction with a particular aspect of the center on a scaleranging from 1 ( Very Dissatisfied) to 5 ( Very Satisfied). Table 6 displays these results.Table 6: Administrator & Staff Ratings of Specific Aspects of their PACE CentersDirectorStaffTotalRated areas (0-10):MeanStd DevMeanStd DevMeanStd atisfaction areas (1-5):Overall design of 51.43.51.4Windows4.21.23.41.53.51.5Noise control4.11.03.21.53.31.5Amount of space3.91.03.21.53.31.4Views to the outside3.81.43.31.63.41.6Hallways/ 01.49

Findings and Recommendations Regardingthe Design and Function of Key Areas and FeaturesIn this section the following areas and features of a PACE day center are discussed in detail: Location Entrance Activity rooms Kitchen and dining areas Clinic and therapy rooms Toilets and sinks for participants Shower and bathing areas Features impacting mobility Office space Hallways and connections between rooms Storage space Outdoor areasIncluded for each area are the following: Representative photographs; Discussion of key functions; Respondent comments regarding features they liked and wanted in see improved inresponse to open-ended questions; Discussion of important design and functional issues; and RecommendationsNOTE: The photographs included in this report represent examples of the range ofcurrent practice and often do not represent examples of best practice. Please refer tothe text for specific recommendations.10

LOCATIONABCDKEY FUNCTIONS OF LOCATION IN A PACE PROGRAM The building should be centrally located for ease of transporting participants to and from their placesof residenceFirst-time visitors need to be able to locate the building, and the exterior often gives an importantfirst impressionDay-to-day staff members, as well as specialty staff members, will be accessing the building atdifferent times of day; so the location should be safe, with available parkingParticipants may also need access and transportation to other off-site servicesRESEARCH RESULTSComments from Staff of 13 PACE Sites About their Locations(N number of respondents listing that item)What they liked bestNChanges they would like to makeCentrally-located or downtown26Location not pleasantPleasant setting25Limited parking availableEasily accessible by transportation25Unsafe locationClose to participants or communities21Difficult to locateConvenient to senior resources or places of17Not easily accessible by transportationinterestDissatisfied with buildingN32201586611

IMPORTANT ISSUES IN CONSIDERING LOCATION Pleasant atmosphere. Most often mentioned by staff was satisfaction with or desire to have apleasant atmosphere surrounding the center. Staff members found the atmosphere pleasant whenit was quiet, in a neighborhood or other similar area (as seen in photo A’s offset location),surrounded by trees and shrubs (as seen in photos B and D), and without heavy traffic. Commoncomplaints included “no landscaping or outdoor spaces.” Another overlooked feature may bepositioning of the building, as this may impact temperature and shade. One staff member wasdissatisfied with the center’s “north exposure for our climate. A south or southwest exposure wouldbe beneficial.” Transportation accessibility. Accessibility for both staff and participants was another key issuementioned. PACE centers often achieved accessibility by being in a central or downtown locationwith highway access. Staff members mentioned that having close access to multiple highways ormain roads was a positive feature. Another staff member mentioned that “it is located in the middleof town. It is easy to get to from all directions, without having to go very far.” Since some largecities make transportation difficult, and because some staff members may use public transportation,being on a bus route and seating at bus stops are also considerations. Close to participants. Overall, most PACE sites were described as being ideally located to serveparticipants in their area. Some sites were strategically located “in a central part of town, wheremany people don’t have a lot of financial resources.” The typical PACE client, one who is Medicareand Medicaid eligible, would be likely to live in these particular areas. One staff member liked thatthe site was located near housing for underserved elderly, proving good access to these clients.Sometimes sites collaborated with programs to be connected to senior residences. In other cases,the center was just located nearby to residences, such as one elderly high rise. Resources available. Many staff members mentioned that access to senior and communityresources was an important and positive feature of their PACE center. The most common resourcementioned was a hospital, with one center being right across the street from one. Other resourcesincluded police stations, libraries, senior centers, restaurants, and shopping centers. In addition,some staff members mentioned the actual setting of the building (i.e., whether free standing or not)in relation to potential resources. For example, one site is “located in a mall type setting that allowsfor ready access to other services utilized by the program” (like in photo C). Parking. Having adequate parking was another important issue mentioned by staff. A goodexample of adequate parking is seen in photo B. Often there was not enough parking for staffmembers, especially in downtown locations, which required staff and visitors to walk a long distanceto get to the building. The location may negatively impact parking. In one instance, the center islocated in a shopping center so parking was bad and busy (as might occur in photo C). Visitorparking was another area that was lacking due to the design and constraints of the parking andoutdoor entry space. One staff member mentioned “the front of the center only has limited space forbuses to pull up to. However, if family or visitors need access for a short period of time, they haveto maneuver through with buses.” Safety. Safety of the building’s location is an issue that should not be overlooked. Staff membersaddressed issues of safety in a multitude of ways. In some cases, the street location was unsafe.Examples include: “Front door is literally on the street and access is unsafe,” and “Situated at abusy intersection where a number of vehicle and pedestrian accidents have occurred.” The center’slocation has implications for participant independence and staff assistance. One staff memberexplains that the center is “right next to a major road on one side. This limits their ability to roam thelands on their own.” Another issue of safety involves hazardous weather. In urban locations, manycenters would be well-equipped to deal with weather conditions. In other cases, the sites have lessthey can do about hazardous weather. For example, “our center is located on top of a mountain,therefore, in bad weather it becomes a safety hazard.” Finally, due to funding and client base,PACE sites may be located in generally unsafe areas that are in need of better security.12

RECOMMENDATIONSThings to do:1. Balance accessibility with a pleasant atmosphere. A serene environment is often sacrificed for acentral location near main roads.2. Parking should be designed for the many consumers and employees of the center, includingparticipants, full-time staff members, part-time staff members, and visitors.3. Locate the center in a quiet area with minimal noise if possible. If the location is noisy (e.g., on amain street), it is essential to provide sufficient interior acoustic treatment to control noise.4. Provide access to abundant well-designed outdoor space.5. Offer adequate external lighting to provide safety in the winter when staff and clients may beentering and exiting in darkness.Things to avoid:1. Do not underestimate the importance of having a serene and attractive entry and building.Participants and staff members do notice these features.2. Try to avoid a setting that lacks sufficient planning for parking and also growth.13

ENTRANCEABCDEKEY FUNCTIONS OF ENTRANCES IN A PACE PROGRAM Participants unload in groups from transportation vans to enter the buildingThe entry is the first area of the building that participants and visitors encounterEntry spaces are not used by participants for long periods of time, but they are used by everyparticipant at least twice per visit (entering and exiting), making them subject to a lot of traffic flowReceptionists and/or transportation coordinators and their offices are often located here14

RESEARCH RESULTSComments from Staff of 13 PACE Sites About their Entrances(N number of respondents listing that item)What they liked bestNChanges they would like to makeAppropriate entry doors20Increase protection from elementsSafe or easy entry from outside18Enlarge or widen spaceLarge or wide area17Better entry doorsLayout that is open or enhances accessibility15Easier or safer entry from outsideAttractive décor15More attractive décorImprove layoutN141110966IMPORTANT ISSUES IN DESIGN AND USE OF ENTRANCES Entrance Doors. Having appropriate, handicap-accessible doors was very important to staff.Desired doors included the following characteristics: Wide enough for wheelchairs, double doordesign, automatic sensor (all seen in photo A). For example, one staff member mentioned that thesite’s doors were “large enough for several people to enter and exit simultaneously.” Large or spacious. While many staff were satisfied with the size of their entry areas (photo E, forexample), many others desired to enlarge the space. One staff member disliked the narrowness ofthe entry space. It seems as though the biggest reason cited for having a large entry was so staffcould “move people quickly in and out” and reduce congestion. Safety and ease of entry from outside. Many participants have mobility limitations, so staffrecognize that entry areas must be safe and allow for the easiest entry possible. Features that aidentry include ramps, preferably those that are not steep. (Note: Although a slope of 1:12 meetsmost building codes, older people often find that a slope of 1:20 is easier to manage). Even better ishaving a flat, one-level entrance without steps or ramps (see photo B). One staff member advisesto “level the pavement leading to the buses so wheelchairs don’t roll into the street” (which would bea problem in busy traffic seen in photo C). Also important is proximity to parking areas or thetransportation van loading area (photos B and C). One staff member praised the unloading area’s“room for four vans at one time,” while another liked the “short distance from the ramp of the van tothe foyer heading into the day center.” Layout providing accessibility. The entry space inside the building directs visitors and membersto the rest of the space in the center, and is, therefore, important. Often the layout was mentionedas a source of congestion (an appropriate layout could resemble the open design of photo E).“Move coat room from the lobby to the day area because of congestion” was one recommendation.“Need separate entrance for participants because too congested” was another. Some centers hadplanned for features that would address congestion issues. For example, a staff member replied“we have stairs and a ramp that assist with traffic flow because they are in different directions.”Other important characteristics of entry areas included having an accessible front desk orreceptionist and being close to the day room. Another recommendation was not having directvisibility to or from the day center, almost creating a separate area cut off from noise and confusion. Décor and aesthetics. Staff members also realized the importance of friendly and inviting décor. Itwas important to have seating for participants in the entry space (photo D). In addition, color, light,plants and shrubs, and display cases add to the atmosphere of the entrance. Staff membersespecially enjoyed entrances that are open (photo E) and airy. Windows can be used to create thisfeeling, along with allowing in needed light (photo D). Protection from elements. Finally, having protection both outside and inside from weatherconditions was desired by staff. Outside, staff preferred covered areas, and in some cases, heateddriveways. Staff members also mentioned having a pitched roof to control rain near the entry doors.Inside the center, staff mentioned it would be beneficial to “add some kind of barrier between doorsand center space” or to position the door in such a way that would reduce the amount of cold airfrom the outdoors being let in during the winter (photo D is an example).15

RECOMMENDATIONSThings to do:1. Ensure there is substantial covered space outside for loading and unloading with adequateclearance for facility vans.2. Provide a level entry, including a level loading pad.3. Design a welcoming exterior entry. For example, creative use of warm, bright colors, plants, andart work well.4. The entry should not be readily visible from the main activity areas (including hallways). This willhelp keep cognitively impaired residents from focusing on the exit.5. Design doorways to exceed ADA minimum requirements. Many wheelchairs are larger andwider today, and seniors require added turn around space.6. Consider a double entry/vestibule (e.g., photo D) for energy efficiency, especially in cold weatherareas. A right angle entry through the vestibule helps to prevent or minimize “wind tunnel”effects. With a straight entry, the breeze will make the lobby uncomfortable since both doors willbe open due to the timing delay. Or, lengthen the lobby so exterior doors close before the lobbydoors open.7. Provide coat closets near the entrance. Design them in a manner that minimizes crowdingduring high traffic times.8. Provide seating near the entry. Use appropriate seating (i.e., with appropriate seat height in therange of 16 inches to 17 5/8 inches and arms to assist in sitting and standing).Things to avoid:1. It is important to have automatic doors wide enough for wheelchairs to pass through (i.e., atleast 36 inches, and preferably 40 inches).2. Avoid assuming that participants will be able to enter the building and know where to go toaccess the day center quickly. Often the space will become congested, and the layout shouldbe easy for participants to navigate.3. Avoid taking space away from the entry to add to other areas of the center in the hope that,because the entrance is not in constant use, the space does not matter.16

ACTIVITY ROOMSABCDFEKEY FUNCTIONS OF ACTIVITY ROOMS IN A PACE PROGRAM By activity rooms we mean any of a variety of spaces in which participants do things that providethem with pleasure, success, a sense of usefulness, and/or as normal a level of functioning aspossibleParticipants spend the majority of their time in one or more of these activity spacesParticipants should enjoy the time they spend hereAreas should be able to accommodate formal (group) activities, public events, and private timeIn almost all centers, activity rooms are also used for dining17

RESEARCH RESULTSComments from Staff of 13 PACE Sites About their Activity Rooms(N number of respondents listing that item)What they liked bestNChanges they would like to makeLarge, spacious activity areas32More spaceGood lighting (including natural light)24Multiple areas for activitiesAttractive décor18More open layout to reduce congestionOpen / functional layout of room13SoundproofingVersatility11Different furnitureImprove atmosphereN191311866IMPORTANT ISSUES IN DESIGN AND USE OF ACTIVITY SPACES Overall amount of activity space. Ample space for activities is considered very important byPACE staff. Overwhelmingly, staff enjoyed a large or spacious area, and when adequate activityspace was lacking, the space feels crowded (as might occur, for example, in photo C). One of themost common requests of surveyed staff was to “provide a little more space between table setups tohave plenty of room for wheelchairs and walkers.” “Need more room in order to facilitate a widervariety of activities” was another comment. The importance of planning ahead is evident as PACEcenters become busier over time. “The activity area became less and less over time as the censusgrew,” remarked one staff m

Table 4: Layout Director Staff Total Current layout of building best supports needs. Freq % Freq % Freq % Strongly Disagree 0 0.0 3 3.7 3 3.2 Disagree 1 7.7 24 29.3 25 26.3 Agree 8 6

Related Documents:

All 13 Layouts use White Daisy CS for bases, so you will need 26 sheets for your layouts. Whisper CS #3 4 x 12 Layout B 4 x 12 Layout B 4 x 12 Layout C Whisper CS #4 4 x 12 Layout C 4 x 12 Layout C 4 x 12 Layout C Saffron Letter B&T #1 (letters facing sideways) 6 x 10 ½ Layout A 6 x 8 Layout A 6 x 4 Layout K 6 x 1 ½ Cricut

Oct 30, 2014 · EE501 Lab 6 Layout and Post-layout Simulation Report due: Oct. 30, 2014 Objective: 1. Practice analog layout techniques 2. Practice post-layout simulation Tasks: 1. Layout the two stage amplifier designed in Lab 4(As shown in Fig 1) Common centroid layout of the fi

1 Layout Tutorial This tutorial will explain how create a layout template, send views to a layout page, then save the document in PDF format. In this tutorial you will learn about: Creating a Layout Template Creating a Border and Title Block Sending Floor Plan Views to Layout Sending Elevation Views to Layout

process or functional layout and combination or group layout. Each kind of layouts is explained with respective advantages, disadvantages and application as under. 1. Fixed or Position Layout Fixed or position layout is also known as project layout. A typical fixed layout is shown in Fig.1.1. In this

shop or a process layout. Each cell in the CM layout is formed to produce a single part family, that is, a few parts with common characteristics. Combination or hybrid layout: It is difficult to use the principles of product layout, process layout

Sales Invoice: Design Layout For Layout Customization, Autocount Accounting V2 added in ‘Save Layout To File’ and ‘Load Layout from File’ like what users can do for report design. Users can save any layout their

the development and progress of layout design [6]. 3. The Application of Visual Psychology in the Layout Design of New Media 3.1 Layout Design in New Media The layout design of new media is mainly based on digital information technology, which makes great changes in the speed, efficiency and mode of information dissemination. With the rapid

Relationship Layout Planning (CORELAP). ALDEP is construction based algorithm and is used when activity relationship is a major consideration. It develops a layout design by randomly selecting a department and placing in the layout. The departments are placed in layout based on its closeness rating.