RPAS Airworthiness Negotiation Between Military Regulator .
RPAS AirworthinessNegotiation betweenMilitary Regulator andManufacturerMarch 24, 2015Doug DavisDirector of Airworthiness, Northrop Grumman CorporationICAO RPAS Symposium Montreal, Quebec, CanadaMarch 23-25 2015Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
US Airworthiness AuthoritiesNational Airworthiness Council (NAC)Public AcceptanceConsistencyacross NAS(National AirspaceSystem)Single Voice onUS AWTitle 10Standard forNational AW2Tri-ServiceStandards (516)Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505NORTHROP GRUMMAN PRIVATE / PROPRIETARY LEVEL I
NAVAIR Flight Clearance AuthorityUS Code Title X, Ch 503, Sec 5013DoDD 5030.61Public Aircraft OperationsSECNAVINST 5400.15COPNAVINST 3710.7U & 3510.15ANAVAIRINST 13034.1DAIR-00 is Design Control Activity Authority, Technical Authority, andAirworthiness AuthorityAirworthiness Execution3Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
NAVAIR Airworthiness Authorityas delegated to AIR-4.0P All USN/USMC owned or leased aircraftshall have an airworthiness approval inthe form of a Flight clearance documentpromulgated / issued byCOMNAVAIRSYSCOM– Per OPNAVINST 3710.7U:NATOPS General and FlightOperating Instructions (dated 23Nov 2009)AIR-00 DELEGATESAIRWORTHINESS AUTHORITY TOAIR-4.0P Flight clearances issued as anIFC/Interim Flight Clearance– NATOPS-Naval Air Training andOperating ProceduresStandardization– NATIP-Naval Aviation TechnicalInformation Product4Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
The Flight Clearance ProcessUAS SpecificAI R -4.0P FLI GHT CLEAR ANCE P R OCESSSAM E AS GEN ER AL P R OCESS W I THSOM E SP ECI FI C STEP S5Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
Roles and Responsibilities Flight Clearance Key Players Requirements defined inNAVAIRINST 13034.1D (which governs the USNairworthiness process) including minimum andrecommended training and empowerment levels for:– APMSE (Assistant Program Manager for Systems &Engineering)– Competency Managers– TAEs (Technical Area Expert)– Facilitators– Test Team members6Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
Roles and ResponsibilitiesOriginal Equipment Manufacturer / Prime Supports the NAVAIR Airworthiness Process When applicable, submit accurate requests Provides data, details, project descriptions, and any necessarysupport to NAVAIR engineers, as required7Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
Roles and ResponsibilitiesNAVAIR 4.0P– Owns the process Educates all participants of the process Provides tasking to TAEs to review flight clearances Ensures a proper and complete engineering review Releases clearances on behalf of AIR-00 Keeps NAVAIR leadership informed of airworthiness issues8Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
Airworthiness TerminologyAirworthiness The property of an air system configuration to safely attain, sustain, and compete flight per approved usage limits. USN airworthiness process is governed by NAVAIRINST 13034.1EDRAP (Engineering/Data Requirements Agreement Plan) USN term to document the NAVAIR / NGC agreement on what engineering data is required to establish the systemairworthiness.DEL (Data Element List) Appendix A of the EDRAP. An Excel spreadsheet (recommended but not mandated) listing specific MIL-HDBK-516 criteria paragraphs identified to beapplicable to system. Spreadsheet also contains the allocation, artifacts (supporting data), status for each criteria.– MIL-HDBK-516 is the ‘DoD Handbook containing the airworthiness certification criteria.It is important that there be a means to trace 516 criteria/standards/MOCs and data artifacts to the DELEDEF (EDRAP Data Evaluation Form) One page word document produced to support the review of each item identified within the DEL spreadsheet. The formexplicitly shows which artifact (supporting data) is used to substantiate each MIL-HDBK- 516 criteria and allows theNAVAIR TAE to:–Approve (with or without limitations)–DisapproveUsed on several Navy/NGC programs, but is not universally applied across USN UAS airworthinessArtifacts (data elements)9 Supporting data showing the compliance to the MIL-HDBK-516 criteria. Each Artifact can be used by multiple RE/TAEs and can be mapped to one or many different MIL-HDBK- 516 criteria.Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
MIL-HDBK-516 to EDRAPThe building blocks of the airworthiness processTailored Airworthiness CriteriaStandardsMethods ofComplianceArtifactsPlanningMeetingEDRAPData Elements List10Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
EDRAP (Engineering/Data Requirements Agreement Plan) EDRAP developed by program should capture meeting decisions– If design changes, EDRAP will need to be updated Ensure Contractors understand required analyses / data– Govt may need to help Contractors in performing analyses tosupport the development of the flight clearance data pkg.– A flight clearance “Gotcha” is to submit analyses with errors andthose that do not follow MIL-STD guidance. IFC Request– Reference planning meeting & TAEs– Submit request with most/all of data1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.9.10.11.12.13.14.Program descriptionIPT/EDT POCsPlatform POCScheduleNeed dates for FCConfiguration for FCLimitations/envelope for FCImpact to NATOPS / NATIPFlight clearance facilitatorIPT POC to submit requestData element listTechnical concerns / riskSignature blockDate of issuePre-coordination No surprises Happy TAEs Faster IFC!11Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
General Airworthiness Process FlowNoChange inConfiguration,Usage, orEnvironment DefinedFocus Groups(RE, TAE, AW Team,Class Desk)EDRAPAgreement?YesArtifactsApproved?Artifact SubmittalsYesRework uest FlightClearance from AIR4.0PNoRisk, Hazard,or LimitAccepted?No12Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
USN and Industry Certification CoordinationRepresentative ExampleKey tionRequirementdefinition,Test stingTRRNGC IFCFormaltesting(SW, SST,ST)ProposedDELfor IFCNAVAIRagreedupon DELTestReadinessReview /SafetyReview BoardFinalDTRsubmittalfor NGCCert andDELsupport13ERB /TPAFirstFlightFlight Readiness ReviewFlightTestPlansSystemConfigurationand AnalysisGround cationAWQualificationPlan,EDRAPJointHSCMNGC oved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
Summary USN has decades of experience and has strong processes forvery effective airworthiness certification Joint Industry and USN working as a integrated team ensuressuccess Buy in from USN upfront is critical EDRAP negotiation early is keyKey to Success 14Strong working relationships between USN and Industry!Approved for Public Release: by NAVAIR, 3/18/15; Northrop Grumman 15-0505
– MIL-HDBK-516 is the ‘DoD Handbook containing the airworthiness certification criteria. It is important that there be a means to trace 516 criteria/standards/MOCs and data artifacts to the DEL EDEF (EDRAP Data Evaluation Form) One page word document produced to support the r
Certification and Continuing Airworthiness, včetně Amendmentu 1. Dokument ICAO Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9760), Volume II byl vytvořen na základě materiálů obsažených v dokumentech Manual of Procedures for an Airworthiness Organization (Doc 9389), Continuing Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9642) a Airworthiness Techn
This manual contains instructions for the operation and management of Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS) and all persons involved in the operation of RPAS that are controlled under the authority of the {Company Name} Remotely Piloted Aircraft Operator's Certificate (ReOC). 0.2 Distribution Control
2 To subscribe to Negotiation Briefings, call 1 800-391-8629, write to negotiation@law.harvard.edu, or visit www.pon.harvard.edu. Make the most of your negotiation training: Translate your new knowledge of negotiation into skills that stick. So you're thinking about taking a negotiation course but are not sure if it will be worthwhile.
Negotiation planning and execution is a critical competency for all procurement professionals. . The purpose of this document is to ensure proper alignment of the strategy for negotiation with Insert vendor Name . Fact Based Negotiation (FBN) Data -Negotiation Lever 1 -Negotiation Lever 2
military negotiation models cannot be easily drawn from the practice of mere interest-based bargaining. Negotiation skills and knowledge should be con-sidered as part of engaged leadership competency. Professor Matyók’s work presents strategies to advance negotiation educa-tion and training in the military. The work highlights the need to .
Continued airworthiness standards The current international standards for the continued airworthiness of aircraft are defined in the ICAO Airworthiness Manual (Doc 9760) published in 2001 and in Annex 6 - Operation Footnote 3 With t
Provide an overview of basic negotiation concepts, types, styles, tactics, and techniques by having students review the handout, Introduction to Negotiation. Check for understanding and clarify any points that are unclear. Module 2 Developing Your negotiation SkillS OVERVIEW This module introduces students to a useful life skill – negotiation.
not know; am I my brother’s keeper?’ (Genesis 4:9) N NOVEMBER 2014 the Obama administration in the United States announced an extension of relief for immigrant families, prompting one cartoonist to caricature ‘an immigrant family climbing through a window to crash a white family’s Thanksgiving dinner’ with the ‘white father unhappily telling his family, “Thanks to the president .
