The Guide: Identifying Vulnerable Older Adults And Legal .

2y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
3.79 MB
56 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Vicente Bone
Transcription

Identifying Vulnerable Older Adultsand Legal Options for Increasing TheirProtection During All-Hazards EmergenciesA Cross-Sector Guide for States and CommunitiesU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention

Contact InformationCenters for Disease Control and PreventionHealthy Aging Program4770 Buford Highway, N.E.Mailstop F-15Atlanta, GA 30341Telephone: 1-800-CDC-INFO (232-4636); TTY: v/aging/emergencySuggested CitationCenters for Disease Control and Prevention. Identifying Vulnerable Older Adults and LegalOptions for Increasing Their Protection During All-Hazards Emergencies: A Cross-Sector Guide forStates and Communities. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2012.DisclaimersThe information contained in this document does not constitute legal advice. Use of anyprovision herein should be contemplated only in conjunction with advice from legal counsel.Provisions may need to be modified, supplemented, or replaced to ensure appropriate citationto or compliance with relevant local and state laws, to accurately reflect the intent of parties to aparticular agreement, or to otherwise address the needs or requirement of a specific jurisdiction.Web site addresses of nonfederal organizations are provided solely as a service to readers.Provision of an address does not constitute an endorsement of this organization by CDCor the federal government, and none should be inferred. CDC is not responsible for thecontent of other organizations’ Web pages.

Identifying Vulnerable Older Adults andLegal Options for Increasing TheirProtection During All-Hazards EmergenciesA Cross-Sector Guide for States and CommunitiesU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention

ii

CONTENTSExecutive Summary. vIntroduction. 1The Older Adult Population.2Definitions.3Vulnerable Populations.4Overarching Considerations. 7Developing Plans.7Identifying and Reviewing Selected Legal Authorities.9Defining Categories of Emergencies and Hazards.13Using Operational Models of Emergency Management.14Strategies and Options for Identifying Vulnerable Older Adults. 15Characterizing the Population.15Using Geographic Information Systems (GIS).16Building, Maintaining, and Using Registries.18Using Shelter Intake Procedures to Identify Vulnerable Older Adults.20Action Options. 25Moving Forward. 35References. 37Appendix A. How This Guide Was Developed. 39Work Group Guidance.39Internet and Database Research.40Field-Based Research.40Appendix B. Glossary. 43Acknowledgments. Inside back coverContentsiii

iv

Executive SummaryIntroductionWe cannot accurately predict which groups of people will be most affected by future emergencies. However,recent events have shown that some characteristics of older adults put them at greater risk of illness and deathduring many types of emergencies. For example, older adults may have impaired mobility, diminished sensoryawareness, multiple chronic health conditions, and social and economic limitations—all of which can impairtheir ability to prepare for, respond to, and adapt during emergencies.1 An emergency or disaster also can disruptvital support systems that older adults rely on. For many older adults, independent living is made possible onlywith help from friends, family, and in-home services that provide meals, home-based health care, and help withthe activities of daily living.Events such as Hurricane Katrina in 2005 and the earthquake and tsunami in Japan in 2011 showed howvulnerable older adults can be during emergencies. Unfortunately, research conducted for this guide found threemajor limitations to our ability to plan for and protect older adults: Many different strategies are being used to identify vulnerable older adults across the country,but none of these strategies have been evaluated. No consensus exists on the best way to identify and protect older adults. Gaps exist in legal mandates to protect older adults.This guide is intended to help close many of the gaps in emergency planning and preparedness for vulnerableolder adults. In particular, it aims to give public health officials, the Aging Services Network, emergencymanagement personnel, and essential partners from other sectors and at all jurisdictional levels (community,regional, tribal, and state) the critical information, strategies, and resources they need to improve the planningfor and protection of vulnerable, community-dwelling older adults during all types of emergencies (oftenreferred to as all-hazards emergencies).Overarching ConsiderationsSeveral overarching considerations must be taken into account when planning for vulnerable older adults duringemergencies. For example, planning officials should Include older adult issues and needs when developing preparedness plans. These plans should identifyessential agencies, organizations, and other stakeholders. Identify and review relevant legal authorities. Define the different categories of emergencies and hazards to better understand how specific emergenciesmay affect older adults in the community. Use operational models of emergency management to identify the specific needs of older adults duringeach phase of an emergency.Strategies and Options for Identifying Vulnerable Older AdultsTo develop this guide, we conducted research, solicited input from a cross-sector work group of subject matterexperts, and collected information during site visits in different parts of the country. We found that none of themethods currently being used to identify older adults who may need help in an emergency have been evaluated.Executive Summaryv

These methods are as follows: Characterizing the population: Basic epidemiologic data can be used to guide planning for the delivery ofservices, medications, durable medical equipment, and other materials needed to support older adults duringall phases of an emergency. Using geographic information systems (GIS): GIS mapping technology allows officials to coordinateinformation about the locations of vulnerable older adult populations, community resources to help olderadults, and potential hazards. Understanding where older adults are located and how they might be adverselyaffected by different types of emergencies can help local planners and first responders prepare for how theywill meet the needs of older adults during an emergency. Building, maintaining, and using registries: Registries can be developed to provide information aboutspecific types of help—such as medical equipment, transportation, or evacuation assistance—that vulnerableolder adults will need during an emergency. They also can serve the broader purpose of identifying olderadults who might need any type of help in an emergency. Using shelter intake procedures to identify vulnerable older adults in the community: This informationcan be used to identify older adults who may need special help.Action OptionsThis guide outlines specific actions that can be taken at community, regional, tribal, state, and national levels toidentify vulnerable older adults and plan for their needs during an emergency. These action options are organizedinto the following categories: Develop Plans.Collaborate with Partners.Collect and Use Data.Conduct Training and Exercises. Use Law-Based Solutions.Prepare Older Adults and Caregivers.Shelter Older Adults.Take Action at the National Level.Build, Maintain, and Use Registries.Program Highlights and ResourcesThroughout this guide, we will provide examples from states, communities, and existing programs that demonstrate practical options for addressing the gaps in preparedness planning. These examples will cover topics such asdeveloping plans for rural areas, building community partnerships, leveraging the influence of area agencies onaging, and using technology to plan for older adults’ needs. These examples also serve as models for action andhighlight existing resources that might be helpful to professionals working with vulnerable older adults.Moving ForwardCDC and its work group partners hope this guide can help those involved in emergency preparedness planningat all levels understand the unique needs of older adults. This publication is also intended to offer specificstrategies and options for identifying and protecting vulnerable older adults during all-hazards emergencies.For more information, resources, and practical tools, visit our companionWeb site at www.cdc.gov/aging/emergency.viExecutive Summary

1INTRODUCTIONWe cannot accurately predict whichgroups of people will be mostaffected by future emergencies.However, events such as the 2005hurricane season and the 2011earthquake and tsunami in Japanhave shown that some characteristicsof older adults put them at greaterrisk of illness and death during manytypes of emergencies. For example,older adults may have impairedmobility, diminished sensoryawareness, multiple chronic healthconditions, and social and economiclimitations—all of which can impairtheir ability to prepare for, respondto, and adapt during emergencies.1Emergencies also can disruptthe support systems that manyolder adults rely on. For manyolder adults, independent livingis made possible only with helpfrom friends, family, and in-homeservices that provide meals, homebased health care, and help withchores and personal care needs.In fact, the majority (93%) ofMedicare enrollees aged 65 yearsor older live in the community,rather than in nursing homes orother congregate settings. Nearlyone-third of this group lives alone.2AARP and the American MedicalAssociation, such as We Can DoBetter1 and Recommendations forBest Practices in the Managementof Elderly Disaster Victims,3 high lighted the devastating effects ofHurricane Katrina on older adultsand strengthened the groundworkfor more focused attention on thispopulation.The guidance offered in this publi cation was developed by a workgroup convened by the Centers forDisease Control and Prevention(CDC). (See Appendix A. HowThis Guide Was Developed.) It isintended to help close many of thegaps in emergency planning andpreparedness for vulnerable olderadults. In particular, this guideseeks to give public health officials,the Aging Services Network,emergency management personnel,and essential partners from othersectors and at all jurisdictionallevels (community, regional, tribal,and state) the critical information,strategies, and resources theyneed to improve the planningfor and protection of vulnerable,community-dwelling older adultsduring all types of emergencies.Although officials also need to planfor and protect residents of longterm-care facilities, this guide focuseson the protection of older adultswho live in community settings.It also uses the term all-hazardsemergencies to refer broadly to alltypes of emergencies.In recent years, emergencypreparedness officials have begunto recognize the need to addressthe special needs of older adultsand other vulnerable populations.Landmark publications fromIntroduction1

This guide begins with descriptionsof the older adult population andkey definitions, followed by sectionson overarching considerations andstrategies for identifying vulnerableolder adults. It concludes bypresenting a set of potential actionoptions that can be taken in advanceto improve identification, planning,preparedness, and response effortsto protect vulnerable older adultsduring emergencies. The appendicesinclude information on how thisguide was developed and a glossaryof terms used throughout the guide.The Older AdultPopulationThe older adult population is notcharacterized by age alone. Differentlaws use different parameters todefine this population, especiallyin terms of when people becomeeligible for services. For example,although adults are generallyeligible for Medicare coverage atage 65, they also become eligiblefor services and protections at age60 under the Older AmericansAct (OAA).4 The services providedunder the OAA include many typesof assistance—such as meals, homehealth services, personal care, andtransportation—that help olderadults continue to live in theircommunities. For this guide, wedefine older adult as those aged 60years or older. Another factor thatinfluences whether older adultsneed help during an emergency iswhether they live in a long-termcare facility or in a communitysetting. Community-dwelling olderadults may pose more complexchallenges for planning officials thanthose in long-term-care settingsUsing Population Profiles: FloridaThe Florida Department of Health developed a low-tech,low-cost data collection tool that has proven useful foremergency planning in counties and communities. For eachcounty, the state provides a description of the population, includinginformation on age, disability status, residency status (e.g., older adultswho live alone), food stamp receipt, and dialysis use.This information can help counties identify the specific needs of olderadults and other vulnerable populations in an emergency. State officialscollect data at the county and zip code level from human serviceagencies and other sources, such as the U.S. Census Bureau andthe End-Stage Renal Disease Network. Data are given to countiesin a spreadsheet that can be easily shared and accessed duringemergencies.2Introductionbecause these facilities may alreadybe governed by specific regulations.To remain in their homes, manycommunity-dwelling adults relyon care from family membersor caregivers or from servicesprovided by area agencies on aging,community organizations, or homehealth agencies.Interruption of these services duringan emergency can compromise theself-reliance and independence ofcommunity-dwelling older adults.For these reasons, this guide focuseson the protection of older adultswho live in their homes in thecommunity.Older adults are a diverse group interms of their physical and mentalhealth, and vulnerability cannot becharacterized by age alone. Complexvariations in the health status,living environments, and socialsituations of older adults also makeit hard to protect this populationduring emergencies. For example,an independent older adult wholives on the 18th floor of a highrise building may suddenly becomevulnerable if the electricity goes out

during a hurricane, shutting downthe building’s elevators. Older adultsare at increased risk of disease anddeath during emergencies because offactors such as the following: A higher prevalence of chronicconditions, physical disability,cognitive impairment, and otherfunctional limitations. Dependence on support systemsfor medical care, medication,food, and other essential needs. Potential limitations in theirmobility, their access totransportation, or other aspectsof functional autonomy.1,3In addition to the direct relation ship between age and the prevalenceof chronic conditions,5 nearly 82%of Medicare beneficiaries have atleast one chronic condition, and64% have multiple conditions.6The treatment of these conditionsmay require daily medications,specialized equipment, or carecoordination.7If older adults are not able to getthe medications, equipment, orspecial care they need, they can beat increased risk of complicationsand death during an emergency.DefinitionsEfforts to protect older adultscan be complicated by debatesabout the sensitivity and accuracyof methods used to define thepopulation in need. A variety ofterms have been used to definepopulations considered to be“vulnerable” or in need of specialattention in an emergency. Thesechallenges reflect the need for termsthat are specific enough to includepeople who need special attention,but inclusive enough to encouragethe members of this population toparticipate in the planning process.Making Communities Stronger: AARP and New OrleansOne way to improve emergency response and recovery efforts is to build strong communities. AfterHurricane Katrina in 2005, staff in the AARP office in Louisiana and residents in the Hollygroveneighborhood of New Orleans came together to finds ways to make sure the needs of older adultsare met in an emergency. Their goal was to increase connections between people, stabilize community groups,and help local residents build their leadership and problem-solving skills.Local groups Trinity Christian Community, the Carrollton-Hollygrove Community Development Corporation(CHCDC), and Hollygrove Neighbors helped residents rebuild their homes and lives after Hurricane Katrina. In2007, AARP staff and eight Hollygrove community leaders began working together to improve the neighborhoodand local partnerships.Training Local LeadersTheir first project was to create the Livable Communities Academy (cosponsored by AARP and the LouisianaState University Agricultural Center). Twenty-seven residents met for 8 weeks to learn about community issues,develop priorities for recovery, and learn new leadership and advocacy skills. After 8 weeks, residents set thefollowing priorities: public safety and resident engagement, economic development, health and caregiving, andmobility and transportation. They continued to meet monthly to find ways to get other residents involved and toaddress the issues identified.The partnership between Hollygrove residents and AARP Louisiana has since received funding from the AARPFoundation and the Harrah’s Foundation. This funding pays for technical, research, and evaluation support andhelps the group build organizational capacity.Preparing for EmergenciesTrinity Christian Community and the CHCDC also developed a block captain program and an emergencypreparedness and response guide for residents. Forty-five residents were chosen to be block captains andlearn how to answer questions about disaster recovery and evacuation. Block captains received manuals withinformation about services such as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and service providers suchas the American Red Cross and FEMA. The manual also has guidance on how to choose a contractor and howmuch repairs should cost.Block captains identify people who need help during evacuations, and they help residents keep track of theirmedications, financial papers, and family contact information during an emergency.Introduction3

Although no consensus has beenreached on the most appropriateand useful terminology, thissection describes several termsthat are common in emergencypreparedness planning.Vulnerable PopulationsVulnerable populations are definedby one expert group as follows:“People who cannot comfortablyor safely access and use thestandard resources offered indisaster preparedness, relief andrecovery. They may include peoplewith sensory impairments (blind,deaf, hard-of-hearing); cognitivedisorders; mobility limitations;limited English comprehensionor non-English speaking; as wellas people who are geographicallyor culturally isolated, medicallyor chemically dependent, orhomeless.”8Although no universally acceptedterm exists to define specificvulnerable populations, this guideuses the term “vulnerable olderadults” to describe older adults whomay need additional help duringan emergency.At-Risk PopulationsAt-risk populations were definedby a pandemic planning advisorypanel to the Association of Stateand Territorial Health Officialsas follows: “Those people most atrisk of severe consequences fromthe pandemic, including societal,economic, and health-relatedeffects.”9They are defined by the Officeof the Assistant Secretary forPreparedness and Response asfollows: “Some individuals mayhave greater difficulty accessingthe public health and medicalservices they require followinga disaster or emergency. At-riskindividuals have needs in one ormore of the following functionalareas: communication, medicalcare, maintaining independence,supervision, and transportation.”10The functional areas cited in thisdefinition are commonly known bythe acronym CMIST.Communicating with Older Adults in an EmergencyTo be able to take action in an emergency, people need information they canunderstand. Officials who work in emergency planning must be aware of the needsand limitations of diverse populations, including older adults.11 Age-related limitationssuch as cognitive, hearing, and vision impairments can make it hard for some older adults to getand understand health messages or emergency information.12 A person’s cultural background,language, and literacy level can also affect his or her ability to get, understand, and act oninformation in an emergency at any age.When you create health or emergency messages or instructions, keep in mind the needs ofspecial populations such as older adults, people with sensory impairments, and people withlimited English proficiency. At CDC’s Health Literacy Web site, you can find practical information,resources, and tools on how to develop materials for older adults (see ces/OlderAdults/index.html).134Introduction

Special Needs PopulationsThe National Response Frameworkdefines special needs populationsas follows: “Populations whosemembers may have additionalneeds before, during, and afteran incident in functional areas,including but not limited to:maintaining independence,communication, transportation,supervision, and medical care.Individuals in need of additionalresponse assistance may includethose who have disabilities; wholive in institutionalized settings;who are elderly; who are children;who are from diverse cultures; whohave limited English proficiency orare non-English speaking; or whoare transportation disadvantaged.”14Functional Needs SupportServices (FNSS)The Federal Emergency Manage ment Agency’s (FEMA’s) Guidanceon Planning for Integration ofFunctional Needs Support Servicesin General Population Shelters usesa functional needs frameworkto determine which individualsmight need help in an emergency.FNSS are defined as services thatenable individuals to maintaintheir independence in a generalpopulation shelter. They includethe following: Reasonable modification to policies, practices, andprocedures.Durable medical equipment.Consumable medical supplies.Personal assistance services.Other goods and services asneeded.16People RequiringAdditional AssistanceThis term is used by theMassachusetts Task Force onEmergency Preparedness andPeople Requiring AdditionalAssistance.15Introduction5

6Introduction

2OVERARCHING CONSIDERATIONSEvery jurisdiction (community,regional, tribal, state, and national)faces different challenges inpreparing for and protectingvulnerable older adults in anemergency. Many different factorsmust be considered, including theexistence (or lack) of relevant legalauthorities, the type of emergencymost likely to happen, and whetherthe jurisdiction is primarily urban orrural. Other relevant factors includethe jurisdiction’s demographics,geography, and specific environ mental considerations.Despite the local nature ofmany emergencies, events suchas Hurricane Katrina and theterrorist attacks of September 2001showed that planning and responserequirements for major emergenciesmust go beyond the local levelbecause additional help is oftenneeded from state and federalagencies. This section outlineskey overarching considerationsidentified during the developmentof this guide. These considerationsmay help officials at all levels planand implement measures to protectvulnerable older adults duringemergencies.plans should identify essentialagencies, organizations, andother stakeholders. Identify and review relevantlegal authorities. Define the different categoriesof emergencies and hazards tobetter understand how specificemergencies may affect olderadults in the community. Use operational models ofemergency management toidentify the specific needs ofolder adults during each phaseof an emergency.Developing PlansComprehensive, all-hazardsemergency preparedness requiresthe development and maintenanceof emergency operations plans(EOPs) that address the needsof vulnerable older adults. Theplanning process helps encouragekey organizations and entities toestablish and maintain relationshipsessential for community, regional,tribal, and state jurisdictions toeffectively respond to emergencies.Cross-Sector CollaborationCross-sector collaboration betweenall key partners across jurisdictionsis a vital part of preparednessplanning. Planning for special needspopulations, including older adults,may also benefit from includingcommunity members who representspecial needs populations. Basiccross-sector activities should includethe following: identifying vulnerableolder adults and other populationswith special needs before an emer gency occurs, developing plans forrisk communication, providingFor example, planning officialsshould Include older adult issuesand needs when developingpreparedness plans. TheseOverarching Considerations7

shelter, ensuring continuity ofmedical care, transporting thesegroups to shelter and safety, andreintegrating displaced older adultsback into their communities. Essential PartnersAgencies and organizations from avariety of levels will be key in theplanning process. These groups mayinclude government entities, AgingServices Network agencies (whichmay or may not be governmental),and community partners.Government EntitiesGovernment agencies at all levelsare critical partners in emergencyplanning and response and mayinclude the following: Federal agencies. U.S. Department of Healthand Human Services (HHS)agencies, including CDC,the Administration on Aging,the Centers for Medicare &Medicaid Services, the Officeof the Assistant Secretary forPreparedness and Response,the Indian Health Service, theFood and Drug Administration,and the Health Resources andServices Administration.U.S. Department of HomelandSecurity agencies, includingFEMA and the Customs andBorder Patrol.State agencies.State Attorneys General.Medicaid programs.State civil defense.State departments of behavioralhealth.State departments of publichealth.State emergency managementagencies.State units on aging. Regional agencies. Metropolitan Transportation Authorities.Regional governing councils.Regional planning commissions.Local agencies.Aging services providers.Area agencies on aging.Fire departments.Hospital associations.Law enforcement agencies.Local health departments.Local emergency managementoffices.Long-term-care associations.Tribal organizations.Bureau of Indian Affairs.Local councils.Tribal governments.Ensuring Workforce Competence: HawaiiPartners from many different sectors share responsibilityfor identifying and protecting vulnerable older adults inemergencies. Each group has its own training requirements,which may or may not include information about older adults. Allemergency responders should have a basic understanding of theunique needs of this population in order to plan and care for themin an emergency.The State of Hawaii is a leader in this area. In 2005, the U.S.Department of Health and Human Services funded the PacificEmergency Management, Preparedness, and Response InformationNetwork and Training Services (Pacific EMPRINTS) to providecontinuing education programs for emergency medical personnel andcommunity health providers.17 In 2009, funding was continued by theU.S. Department of Homeland Security.Pacific EMPRINTS works to help health professionals Recognize terroristic and other emergencies.Meet the acute care needs of the population, includingvulnerable populations.Participate in coordinated, multidisciplinary responsesto emergencies.Rapidly and effectively alert the public health system ofan event at the community, state, or national level.The Pacific EMPRINTS Web site offers free, online courses andtutorials, several of which address vulnerable populations. Healthprofessionals who work with older adults in Hawaii also have beentrained through the PREPARE program, thanks to a partnership withMather LifeWays, a nonprofit organization based in Illinois (seehttp://matherlifeways.com/re prepare.asp for more information).8Overarching Considerations

Aging Services NetworkThe Ag

Many different strategies are being used to identify vulnerable older adults across the country, but none of these strategies have been evaluated. No consensus exists on the best way to identify and protect older adults. Gaps exist in legal mandates to protect older adults.

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.