Hydrography TWG Minutes 09/08/2016
Hydrography TWG Minutes 09/08/2016Hydrography Requirements & Benefits Survey (HRBS) Results – Stephen Aichele, USGS HRBS webpage: http://nationalmap.gov/HRBS.html HRBS Executive Summary: http://nationalmap.gov/docs/HRBS ExecSummary.pdf The HRBS will allow for the Expansion and Improvement of Hydrography in the National Map.o A justification document Lots of State Government respondents followed by Local Government than Federal Agencies Identified Mission Critical Activities (MCAs) that were grouped into Business Uses (BUs)o Five BUs floated to the top: Water Quality Water Resource Planning and Management Flood Risk Management River and Stream Flow Management River and Stream Ecosystem Management Priority order depended on respondent MCA Specific Requirementso Positional Accuracy: /- 3 ft. requested, /- 7 ft would doo Stream Density: 5.0 miles of channel/sq mile requested, 2.5 miles of channel/sq milebesto Smallest Contributing Watershed: 6 Ac requested, 60 Ac would doo Smallest Contributing Waterbody: 1 Ac requested, 1 Ac would doo Update Frequency: annual requested, 2-3 yr would doo Post- Event (like a flood) Update: Highly desirable to nice to haveo Level of detail: Best Available: Please see slide 17 of presentationo Level of Integration with other Datasets Top 5: Elevation Stream Flow Wetlands Soils Land Cover Elevation/Hydro integration at 1:12000 requested Benefits: Annual Benefits of 538 to 544 million Doing some Pilot Studieso Looking at 5 Landscapes: humid, arid, rough, smooth, and coastal plus plaino Looking at 3 levels of Mapping, all using LiDARo Want to improve positional accuracy of NHD Features and move to 1:4800o Will use to develop program recommendationsNational Hydrography Dataset (NHD)/Watershed Boundary Dataset (WBD) Model Changes and ToolUpdates – Elizabeth Stevens-Klein & Kristiana Elite, USGS NHD Model 2.2.1 (http://nhd.usgs.gov/NHDv2.2.1 poster 081216.pdf)o Main Path: An NHDPlus Attributeo In Network: An NHDPlus Attributeo Visibility Filter – For Scaling WBD Model 2.2.1 (http://nhd.usgs.gov/WBDv2.21 poster 8 1 16fin.pdf)
o Renamed NonContributingAcres to NonContributingAreaAcreso Renamed NonContributingSqKm to NonContributingAreaSqKmo Renamed HUClass to HUDigito Removed HULevel field.Desktop Tool Statuso NHD: 10.3.1 tool version is 6.3.0.11. After 09/30/2016, 10.3.1 version will be required.(Older tools will only work on checkouts done before 09/30/2016.)o WBD: Currently requires 10.3.1 tool version 2.3.2.5o HEM: Works on ArcGIS 10.3.1o Conflation: Still on ArcGIS 10.2NHD & WBD Distribution Statuso NHD: Staged Products in Testing. Expect State Extracts by early Oct. Will have Model2.2.1 for both NHD & WBDo WBD: HUC 2 & National available.Discussion: How to incorporate Events into the NHD? – Linda Davis, Lead NHD has 8177 point events in Idaho in national database – mostly water quality and streamgage stations. The flow alteration points in Idaho currently in national database are on ID/WA border. ORwants to add flow alteration (diversion) points too. HEM Tool the USGS tool for making NHD Events. EPA also has HEM Add-on Tools Discussion on: What we want to keep as a state? Where to store it? How to update? What toadd to national database? Al Rea showed the National Hydrography Dataset Linked Data 530d0115e4b08f991722dce3?community National Hydrography Dataset Linked Data Registry)o For sharing data to publico For NHD Linked Datasetso Includes ESRI portalo Mike Tinker is the USGS Contact for the National Hydrography Dataset Linked DataRegistry National Water Quality Portal (http://www.waterqualitydata.us/)o On 100K NHD Pluso Stations tied as Events by Catchmento Does Traceso Loads data from Storet NHD Feature Serviceso USGS needs clear requirements for NHD Feature Services Which Feature Classes Which Attributes How do you want to use ito Have cached web services. (http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/services/ Theme Overlays)o Suggestion: Dissolve on GNISID or ReachCode for GNISID IS NULL to reduce segmentdensity.LiDAR Applications/EleHydro – Linda Davis
The FY16/FY17 Broad Agency Announcement (BAA) for 3D Elevation Program (3DEP) has beenreleased.o Proposals are due by 5 pm ET on Oct. 10, 2016o Tom Carlson tcarlson@usgs.gov, our Liason is the USGS contact for this effort. NancyGlenn, BSU (nancyglenn@boisestate.edu) is the elevation lead here in Idaho.Per the Hydrography Goals of FY 2015-2017 (http://nhd.usgs.gov/documents/NHD Plan.pdf ), agoal is to “Create an NHD and WBD well-integrated with high resolution elevation data”.May be possible to pair hydrography work with 3DEP.No funding now for hydrography work. May be funding avail in FY 2018 or later. Will requiregoing through the USGS BAA process.IDWR Updates: Lemhi & Big Lost : Please see 5 Minute Video Presentation.Next Hydrography TWG: March 9, 2017
National Hydrography Requirements andBenefits StudySteve AicheleNational Geospatial ProgramRoland VigerNational Research ProgramThe National Map
Study Process2 April 5, 2016
Study Results Study participation Current use of national hydrography datasets (NHD, WBD,NHDPlus) MCAs Business Uses Requirements Federal Program Budgets Benefits3 April 25, 2016
Study Participation Raw questionnaire responses: 577 MCAs from 501respondents After interview/workshop consolidation:Number ofAgencies/EntitiesNumber ofMCAsPercent ofMCAs perOrganizationTypeFederal Agencies andCommissions215413%Not for Profit24256%Private or Commercial14164%Regional, County, City, orOther Local Government538019%State Government18323756%882%303420100%Organization TypeTribal GovernmentTotal
Current Use of National Datasets
Mission Critical Activities Up to 5 Mission Critical Activities (MCAs) perrespondent Total of 420 for study (after consolidation) Study participants provided the following for eachMCA: Title and descriptionOne of 25 pre-defined Business UsesGeographic area of interestRequirementsProgram budgetCurrent and future benefits
Mission Critical Activities
Business UsesBU#MCAs479Water Quality75Forest Resources Management369Water Resource Planning andManagement224Health and Human Services1554Flood Risk Management113Geologic Resource Assessment andHazard Mitigation144River and Stream Flow Management133Renewable Energy Resources234Natural Resources Conservation143Oil and Gas Resources534193Marine and Riverine Navigation Safety2018253Recreation2117Urban and Regional Planning122Resource Mining109Agriculture and Precision Farming162Sea Level Rise and Subsidence249Education K-12 and Beyond81Rangeland Management68Coastal Zone Management17198Wildlife and Habitat Management230187Homeland Security, Law Enforcement,and Disaster ResponseBusiness UseRiver and Stream EcosystemManagementInfrastructure and ConstructionManagementBU#MCAsBusiness Use420Wildfire Management, Planning, andResponseReal Estate, Banking, Mortgage, andInsuranceTotal
MCA Specific Requirements Positional accuracy Stream density Smallest contributing watershed Smallest mapped waterbody Update frequency Post-event update Level of detail Required characteristics/analytical function Level of integration between hydrography and other datasets
Positional AccuracyPositional Accuracy Most frequently requested positionalaccuracy by Federal agencies is /- 40feet; however this only meets 34% ofFederal requirementsOverall most frequently requestedpositional accuracy is /- 3 feet24%27%35%56%22%26%24%19%19% /-7 feet accuracy would meet 76% ofFederal, 73% of state, and 65% of overallrequirements but only 44% of otherorganization CAsState GovernmentMCAs /- 3 feet, 90% (1:1,200-scale) /- 7 feet, 90% (1:2,400-scale) /- 33 feet, 90% (1:12,000-scale) /- 40 feet, 90% (1:24,000-scale)OtherOrganizationMCAsTotal MCAs /- 170 feet, 90% (1:100,000-scale) /- 420 feet, 90% (1:250,000-scale)No answer provided
Stream densityStream Density Most frequently requested streamdensity by Federal agencies is 2.5miles of channel/sq.mi.31%39%Overall most frequently requestedstream density is 5.0 miles ofchannel/sq.mi.Stream density of 2.5 miles ofchannel/sq.mi. would meet 69% ofFederal, 61% of state, and 61% ofoverall eral GovernmentMCAs2%State GovernmentMCAs5.0 miles of surface waterchannel per square mile (1:5,000-scalemapping)2%Other OrganizationMCAs13%2%Total MCAs2.5 miles of surface waterchannel per square mile (1:24,000-scale)1.0 mile of surface waterchannel per square mile (1:100,000-scale)I don't knowData not provided
Smallest Contributing WatershedSmallest Contributing Watershed Most frequently requested smallestcontributing watershed by Federalagencies is 60 acresOverall most frequently requestedsmallest contributing watershed is 6 acres20%28%33%33%18%29%24%29% Smallest contributing watershed of 60acres would meet 80% of Federal, 71% ofstate, and 71% of overall requirementsSmallest contributing watershed of 6acres would meet 99.5% of GovernmentMCAs2 acres6 acres60 acres2%13%12%State GovernmentMCAs2%OtherOrganizationMCAs7%9%1 square mile (640 acres)10 square miles (6,400 acres)100 square miles (64,000acres)12%Total MCAs1,000 square miles (640,000acres)I don't knowData not provided
Smallest Mapped Water Body Most frequently requested smallestmapped water body by Federal agenciesis tied at less than 1 acre and 1 acre26%Overall most frequently requestedsmallest mapped water body is less than1 acre26%Smallest Mapped Waterbody32%34%40%25%25%6%Smallest mapped water body of 1 acrewould meet 74% of Federal, 68% of state,and 66% of overall ernmentMCAs3%State CAs3%Total MCAsLess than an acre2 acres10 acresOther (please specify)1 acre5 acres20 acresData not provided
Update FrequencyUpdate Frequency Most frequently requested updatefrequency is annually 2-3 year updates would meet 65% ofFederal, 65% of state, and 68% ofoverall %8%11%7%2%FederalGovernmentMCAsAnnually5%State GovernmentMCAs2-3 years3%OtherOrganizationMCAs4-5 years4%Total MCAs6-10 years 10 years
Post-Event UpdatePost-Event Updates13%9%14%26% 35%Most frequently reported response byFederal agencies is “Highly Desirable”Most frequently reported response bystates and overall is “Nice to Have” (butonly by a percentage MCAsState GovernmentMCAsRequiredHighly DesirableOtherOrganizationMCAsNice To Have13%Total MCAsNot Required
Level of DetailLevel of DetailMost frequently reported response byall study participants is “Best Available”70%66%66%67%32%32%32%State GovernmentMCAsOtherOrganizationMCAsTotal MCAs30%FederalGovernmentMCAsBest AvailableConsistent Level of DetailData not provided
Required Features/Analytical FunctionsRequiredCharacteristics/Analytical FunctionsNumberofFederalGov't.MCAs(of 54)Percent NumberNumberTotalofof State Percent of Other Percent ofFederal Gov't. of State Org Type Other Org NumberGov't. MCAs (ofTypeof MCAsGov't.MCAsMCAs(of 420)MCAs(of 23) MCAs129)Percentof TotalMCAsWetlands4787%14561%7760%26964%Calculate drainage area4481%18377%10279%32978%Flow periodicity4380%14963%7558%26764%Linkages to stream gageobservations4380%15666%8364%28267%Delineate 68%4176%10544%5442%20048%Floodplain boundary4074%12553%9372%25861%Velocity or time of travel4074%10042%6047%20048%Calculate streamdistance to points3972%14662%6349%24859%Find upstream ordownstream featureLeft-right bankdelineation
Required Characteristics/AnalyticalFunctions Top 10 of 35 shown Sorted on Federal requirements Wetlands data are most frequently required by Federalagencies Calculate drainage area is most frequently required by statesand overall (2nd for Federal agencies)
Integration with Other Datasets Top 5 for all study participants (in differing order): Elevation Stream flow Wetlands Soils Land cover When “Required,” most frequently needed to “PerformGeospatial Analysis” NWI also frequently needed for geospatial analysis
Non-MCA Specific Requirements Elevation-hydrography data integration Raster elevation-hydrography data integration Most frequently reported requirement is for hydrography to alignwith elevation data at 1:12,000-scale or largerMost frequently reported requirement is to determine new flowpaths across land surface into existing channelsOther requirements Elevation-derived catchments need to be within 5% of actual area Error resolution needs to be within 2-30 days 82% would definitely or probably use a web-based tool to reporterrors20 April 25, 2016
Benefits Annual estimates for 420 MCAs Estimates are likely underestimated: Program budgets: 18.5 to 22.5 billionCurrent annual benefits: 538 to 544 millionFuture annual benefits: 602 to 605 millionRespondents unable to provide dollar estimates for currentannual benefits for 46% of MCAsRespondents unable to provide dollar estimates for futureannual benefits for 35% of MCAsWhere range of values was provided, lower value isused21 April 25, 2016
Benefits by Organization TypeOrganization TypeFederal Agencies andCommissionsTotalNumberof MCAsEstimatedAnnual ProgramBudgetEstimatedCurrent AnnualBenefitsEstimated FutureAnnual Benefits54 11.6 billion 212 million 308 millionNot for Profit25 74 million 3 million 27 millionPrivate or Commercial16 7 million 1 million 2 millionRegional, County, City orOther Local Government80 283 million 137 million 20 millionState Government237 6.5 billion 185 million 245 millionTribal Government8 1 million 205,500 240,000 18.5 billion 538 million 602.5 millionTotal22 April 25, 2016420
Benefits by Business UseBUBusiness UseRiver and Stream FlowBU 1ManagementBU 4 Water QualityBU 3Water Resource Planningand ManagementBU 15 Flood Risk ManagementRiver and StreamEcosystem ManagementNatural ResourcesBU 2ConservationWildlife and HabitatBU 9ManagementInfrastructure andBU 20Construction ManagementBU 523 April 25, nualBenefitsEstimatedFutureAnnualBenefits 763,580,000 220,070,000 154,730,000243 1,672,410,000 115,460,000 121,480,000511 988,880,000 98,110,000 115,880,000393 636,110,000 56,130,000 75,860,000425 1,000,720,000 13,960,000 67,000,000214 6,956,800,000 10,170,000 17,760,000214 1,041,450,000 180,000 10,080,00058 1,088,720,000 1,650,000 8,730,000139WeightedQualitativeBenefits
Benefits Ranking by qualitative benefits differs somewhat fromranking by estimated future annual dollar benefitsBUBusiness Use Ranked byFuture Annual Dollar BenefitsBUBusiness Use Ranked byQualitative BenefitsBU 1River and Stream Flow ManagementBU 4Water QualityBU 4Water QualityBU 15Flood Risk ManagementBU 3Water Resource Planning andManagementBU 3Water Resource Planning andManagementBU 15Flood Risk ManagementBU 1River and Stream Flow ManagementBU 5River and Stream EcosystemManagementBU 5River and Stream EcosystemManagement24 April 25, 2016
Total Benefits by HUC8Coordinate System: North America Albers Equal A.rea ConicProjection: AlbersDatum: D North Amencan 1983C A N A D A1N :-'bQ)C:c.,co0Q)c.,0(.). C,\\u "(.I:)'Q . ExplanationAmerican SamoaEstimated Future Annual Benefits 119,716 119,717 - 138 ,6 55PacificOce11n0,BOMilei;1--r'080 K omoter& 138,658 258,3701111 258,371 . 1,015,0831111 1,015,084. 5,798 ,212. . .-. . .,,,. . , . ,,,., . . :.::··t :::·- :.0Guam andThe NorthernMarianaIslands8-Digit Hydrologic Unitwater BodyCountryIAAlaska500 Miles0II0 .Pa citicPa ciflcOceana30Mle&f----r--'JO Kilom et rsscience for a changing world390 Miles1---,---J370 Kiloroote rsHawaii,oOceBn tPa cir, c0 cell n0100 Miles1-,-100 Kilometers-.IPuerto Rico / US Virgin Islands .:D. -. .:;·- ,'.;,';500 Kilometers0 050 Mil,:is1-------,--l50 K ome terr; . ibbeanSea
Need to understand cost ofmeeting requirements Experience in the NGTOC and elsewhere Pilot efforts Five landscapes – humid, arid, rough, smooth, coastal plain Three levels of mapping Improve positional accuracy of 24K feature content Improve positional accuracy of 24K feature content AND addlocal-res ( 1:4800) content Attribution of linework/conflation Two contractors Level of effort reported for each step, and each landscapeWeighing the benefits and costs to understand value willdrive program recommendation26
Summary of future direction What we know Tighter agreement with elevation data More frequent updates Verifiable cycle/frequency Probably linked to elevation updatesKey functionality Catchment/watershed delineation Upstream/downstream trace and feature discovery Attribute accumulation/summaryWhat we don’t know Feature content standards (aka scale) Capture technology Conflation approach27
Comments/QuestionsSteve Aichele, GeographerUSGS National Geospatial Program717-730-6949saichele@usgs.govRoland Viger, Research GeographerUSGS National Research ap.gov/HRBS.html28
Hydrography’s 1NHD & WBDData Model 2.2.1Roll outIdaho Hydrologic Technical Working Group Meeting9/08/2016Elizabeth Stevens-Klein andKristiana EliteNational Geospatial Technical Operations Center (NGTOC)
Agenda NHD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information NHD - Summary of Data Model Changes WBD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information WBD - Summary of Data Model Changes Desktop Tool Status Check outs / Check in NHD & WBD Distribution Status Distribution data currently in testing2
Agenda NHD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information NHD - Summary of Data Model Changes WBD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information WBD - Summary of Data Model Changes Desktop Tool Status Check outs / Check in NHD & WBD Distribution Status Distribution data currently in testing3
http://nhd.usgs.gov/4
http://nhd.usgs.gov/5
- usGS r. ':/science for a cha11gi11g worldHydrog raphy-'?'!ff! TheNationalMap(ts; ;ii-- -- 2 -- -NHDram Documentationaefin it io ns , an d t he r elat i onships betw een th e tab l es in th e NHD inGEOWBD Data Model {v2.2.1)Diagr am of th e tab les, th e tabl e it em s, th e it em defin it io ns, an d t he r elati onships betw een th e tabl es in t he WBD da t am odel.Too lsApplicationsNHD/WBD Frequently Asked QuestionsGovernanceContact UsTNM Hydrography Fact SheetWatershed Boundary DatasetA brief summa r y of th e hist or y an d ch ar act er i st i cs of th e NHD, w ith add it io na l infor m at ion co nce rn ing obtaining, andm aintai ning th e NH D .Hydrography Seminar SeriesTNM Hydrography Data Stewardship Fact SheetReport Data IssueNHD Linear Referencing Fact SheetAn info r m at i v e desc r iption of how scientist s st or e and link infor mati on t o th e NHD using a r elati ona l data desi gn .NHD StandardsDefin es f ea t ur es, f ea tu r e attr ibutes, attr ibute v alues , de lineation, r epr ese ntat io n r ul es , an d data ex tract io n for th eNat i ona l Hy dro gr aphy Datas et - High Resolution (NH D- HR} at s ca les at 1: 100, 000 or lar ge r .WBD StandardsTh is do cum ent contai ns st anda r ds and speci fi catio ns fo r WBD data . It al so inclu des discu ssio n of objec t i v es ,commun icati ons r equir ed fo r r ev is ing th e data r es oluti on in th e Un it ed St ates and th e Car ibbea n, as w ell as fina lr ev ie w and da ta - quality cr it er ia . USGS.,.,, for.'*"""'1-*': , The National MapYour Source fo r To pographic Info rm ationcontact usGsSearch USGSstewardshipUser Resources6USGSHome--HomeNews
NHD Model 2.2.17ilUSGS. JI .atio,nal Hydrograph Dataset (NHD) Mode](Y2 .2.1 )EATUR:E Cl.ASS S- - -- -- --,Ii-J:·J : .·: :· :·E' ltffl F11atur11 Cla:sa.- :rm ·-., 1 -1- - : - . : .til rfilfiil ll.IJILUJLljl-i; ! -;'J:: . rt :w.,.,.c.t n l ) . · . - . - . . . : . .ll:m, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IW:I.IIIID. . '11*:n;,p
3 New NHD Flowline Attributes1. MainPath2. InNetwork3. VisibilityFilter8
NHDFlowline:9MainPath Attribute & ValuesNHDFlowline feature class:MainPath MainPath DomainDefault 0, AllowNulls NMainPath DomainValues:0123Unspecified [default value]Confluence MainDivergence MainBoth Confluence Main andDivergence Main
NHDFlowline:10InNetwork Attribute & ValuesNHDFlowline feature class:InNetwork NoYes DomainDefault 0, AllowNulls YNoYes Domain01NoYes
VisibilityFilter - Attribute (Field)11A new attribute VisibilityFilter will be added to all TNM vector themes toallow for filtering of features for usage of vector data at approximate scales.NHD will be the first of the vector themes to include this field.VisibilityFilter field was added to the following Hydrography feature classes: NHDFlowline NHDLine NHDArea NHDWaterbodyDefault 0 (Unspecified), AllowNulls N
VisibilityFilter - Values (Domain)CodeValue12DescriptionUnspecified [defaultvalue]Objects with a Visibility Attribute 0 have not been evaluated4800Approximately 1:4,800 orLarger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 4800 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 1:4,800 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:4,800)12500Approximately 1:12,500 orLarger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 12500 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 1:12,500 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:12,500)24000Approximately 1:24,000 orLarger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 24000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 1:24,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:24,000)50000Approximately 1:50,000 orLarger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 50000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 50,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:50,000)100000Approximately 1:100,000 or Objects with a Visibility Attribute 100000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalesLarger Scalesmaller than approximately 1:100,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:100,000)150000Approximately 1:150,000 or Objects with a Visibility Attribute 150000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalesLarger Scalesmaller than approximately 1:150,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:150,000)250000Approximately 1:250,000 or Objects with a Visibility Attribute 250000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalesLarger Scalesmaller than approximately 1:250,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:250,000)500000Approximately 1:500,000 or Objects with a Visibility Attribute 500000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalesLarger Scalesmaller than approximately 1:500,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:500,000)1000000Approximately 1:1,000,000or Larger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 1000000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 1:1,000,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:1,000,000)2000000Approximately 1:2,000,000or Larger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 2000000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 1:2,000,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 1:2,000,000)5000000Approximately 1:5,000,000or Larger ScaleObjects with a Visibility Attribute 5000000 indicates that it is not appropriate to use the object at scalessmaller than approximately 1:5,000,000 (i.e. object should be pruned at scales smaller than 5,000,000)0
Using the VisibilityFilter Field13VisibilityFilter
Agenda NHD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information NHD - Summary of Data Model Changes WBD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information WBD - Summary of Data Model Changes Desktop Tool Status Check outs / Check in NHD & WBD Distribution Status Distribution data currently in testing14
http://nhd.usgs.gov/15
http://nhd.usgs.gov/16
- usGS r. ':/science for a cha11gi11g worldHydrog raphy-'?'!ff! TheNationalMap(ts; ;ii-- -- 2 -- ---NHD/ WBD Program DocumentationNHD Data Model (v2.2. 1)Get DataDia gram of the tables , the tab le items, the item defi nitions , an d t he re lations hips between the tab les in the NHD inGEOWBD Data Model {v2.2.1)f th e tab les , the tab( ·1defi nitio ns, an d the re lationships between the tables in the WBD da taToo lsAppl icationsNHD/WBD Frequently Asked QuestionsGoverna nceContact UsTNM Hydrography Fact SheetWatershed Boundary DatasetA brief summa ry of the histo ry an d cha racte ristics of the NHD, with add itio na l info rmatio n concerning obta ining, andma inta ining the NH D.Hydrography Seminar SeriesTNM Hydrography Data Stewardship Fact SheetReport Data IssueNHD Linear Referencing Fact SheetAn info rmative desc ription of how scientists sto re and link info rmation to th e NH D us ing a re lationa l data des ign.NHD StandardsDefines featu res, featu re attributes, attribute va lues, de lineation, represe ntatio n rules, an d data e xtraction for theNa tiona l Hydro graphy Datase t- Hig h Resolution (NH D- HR} at sca les at 1: 100,000 or la rge r .WBD StandardsThi s do cument conta ins standa rds and specifications fo r WBD data . It also inclu des dis cuss io n of objectives,commun ications req uired fo r re vis ing th e data res olutio n in the Un ited States and th e Ca ribbean, as we ll as fina lre vie w and da ta -qua lity crite ria . USGS.,.,, for.'*"""'1-*': , The National MapYour Source for Topographic Informationcontact usGsSearch USGSHomeNews17USGSHome
WBD Model 2.2.118Watershed B01u ndary Dataset (WBD) Data Model (v2 .2 .1}Na.ional Hy drogTap/1.r,, Dataset ( HD)FEATURE CLASSES.- - .--, --- ' '- 1 · . .--!11 -·.II . .' ----riil :::w"ii ' .-·. - --1111 Et., ,.,- I··· - ':1::::::.- '.A Tl'RIB UTE.TAB LESFf!alUre'-level Maeaata USGS.,.,, for.'*"""'1-*': , The National MapYour Source for Topographic InformationDONS
WBD Model 2.2.1 Summary of ChangesHU12, HU14, HU16 - Feature classesRename fields:NonContributingAcres to NonContributingAreaAcresNonContributingSqKm to NonContributingAreaSqKmWBDLine - Feature classRename fields:HUClass to ‘HUDigit’HUClass Domain to HUDigit Domain.Remove field:HULevel (Field)HULevel Domain19
Agenda NHD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information NHD - Summary of Data Model Changes WBD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information WBD - Summary of Data Model Changes Desktop Tool Status Check outs / Check in NHD & WBD Distribution Status Distribution data currently in testing20
Hydrography Tools - Status NHD Update Tool Current tool (Arc 10.2.2) Version #6.2.1.23 Checkout (NHD 2.2.1 and WBD 2.2) New Tool (Arc 10.3.1) Version #6.3.0.11Released 9/1/16 Checkouts post 9/30/16 (NHD 2.2.1 & WBD 2.2.1)Data Reviewer has changed WBD Editor Tool New Tool (Arc 10.3.1) Version # 2.3.2.5 Checkout (WBD 2.2.1 and NHD 2.2.1)21
Agenda NHD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information NHD - Summary of Data Model Changes WBD Model 2.2.1 Where to find Data Model information WBD - Summary of Data Model Changes Desktop Tool Status Check outs / Check in NHD & WBD Distribution Status Distribution data currently in testing22
Questions .Elizabeth Stevens-Kleinestevens-klein@usgs.govKristiana Elitekeelite@usgs.gov23
Using the VisibilityFilter FieldCode0EXAMPLE:If you wanted to select1:250,000- Scale features:“VisibilityFilter” 250,000Scale 250,000K ANDAll smaller scalesDescriptionUnspecified [default value]4800Approximately 1:4,800 or Larger Scale12500Approximately 1:12,500 or Larger Scale24000Approximately 1:24,000 or Larger Scale50000Approximately 1:50,000 or Larger Scale100000Approximately 1:100,000 or Larger Scale150000Approximately 1:150,000 or Larger Scale250000Approximately 1:250,000 or Larger Scale500000Approximately 1:500,000 or Larger Scale1000000Approximately 1:1,000,000 or Larger Scale2000000Approximately 1:2,000,000 or Larger Scale5000000Approximately 1:5,000,000 or Larger Scale24
Using the VisibilityFilter FieldCode0EXAMPLE:If you wanted to select1:250,000- Scale features:“VisibilityFilter” 250,000Scale 250,000K ANDAll smaller scalesDescriptionUnspecified [default value]4800Approximately 1:4,800 or Larger Scale12500Approximately 1:12,500 or Larger Scale24000Approximately 1:24,000 or Larger Scale50000Approximately 1:50,000 or Larger Scale100000Approximately 1:100,000 or Larger Scale150000Approximately 1:150,000 or Larger Scale250000Approximately 1:250,000 or Larger Scale500000Approximately 1:500,000 or Larger Scale1000000Approximately 1:1,000,000 or Larger Scale2000000Approximately 1:2,000,000 or Larger Scale5000000Approximately 1:5,000,000 or Larger Scale25
Event Data
Events Events are a method of storing distance ortemporal data associated with linear featuresfeatures. NHD can hold linear, point, or poly events NHD currently has point events in thenational dataset – in Idaho they consist ofDams, Flow alterations, HU outlets, streamgages, and water quality stations
.m ndI.OL1.21REA .H ODEA Reac.11 C d is. a j 4 digitm111nbc1· that trnmJly ex l!ldsfrn11u cm1flrne111ce to c , ira.fl uel'ilcealm1 Q a fl wll l!le . T lie first 8digits fa reac.11 is tileubbasin i111 wl1id1 tliefl ,wli 11e .is c , mained . Tile last6 digits am a trniqt1e idemifiert , diat. 1reacl1. A .rnacll n1ay belil.rnde mp of multiple NHDflowti 11e s.1\-
Sep 08, 2016 · MCAs State Government MCAs Other Organization MCAs Total MCAs 5.0 miles of surface water channel per square mile (1:5,000-scale mapping) 2.5 miles of surface water channel per square mile (1:24,000-scale) 1.0 mile of surface water channel per square mile (1:100,000-scale) I don't know Data not provided Stream density
Warm-Up Task 3 minutes 5 minutes Game Procedures Review 5 minutes 5 minutes Research and Argument Building 5 minutes 15 minutes Round 1 (eight contenders) 15 minutes 25 minutes Round 2 (four contenders) 10 minutes 20 minutes Round 3 (two contenders) 7 minutes 15 minutes Reflection and Assessment 5 minutes 5 minutes Total 50 minutes 90 minutes
B3/C3 Handy Wiring Guide B3/C3 May .2015 Hammond Vintage dan.vigin Page 4 2. TWG to keyboards wiring concept. When referring to the Wiring Diagram Fig.4-1 of the B3/C3 service manual, we may notice that terminals of TWG are arranged in a certain order that depends of the TWG
Motorcycle Rider Training Programs, a second technical working group (TWG) was organized and convened. The TWG consisted of State motorcycle rider training program administrators, motorcycle rider training specialists, and other leaders in program administration. TWG participants included: Stacey Axmaker, Idaho STAR Motorcycle Safety Program;
TWG Home Warranty Services, Inc. 175 West Jackson Blvd, Chicago, Illinois 60604 800-341-3624 Please read this Agreement carefully. KEY TERMS: Throughout this document, "You" and "Your" refers to the Dwelling Owner listed on the Declaration Page. "We", "Us", and "Our" refers to TWG Home Warranty Services, Inc., 175
Chapter 3 to refers to depth determination, including both the principles and techniques used; Chapter 4 provides information on sea floor classification and object detection; Chapter 5 refers in particular to water levels and flow; Chapter 6 is devoted to topographic surveying applied to hydrography;
Highland Elementary School 10:20 11:00 45 minutes Science/Social 50 inutes 12:25 Science/Social 50 minutes Science/Social 10:15 Third Grade Science/Social Lunch/Recess 154 minutes 155 minutes 70 minutes Lunch/Recess 60 minutes 45 minutes 100 minutes 11:25 30 minutes 45 minutes 2:20 Master Schedule – Reading/Writing 8:50 – 9:50 Reading .
Grade K 120 minutes Grade 1 120 minutes Grade 2 120 minutes Grades 3-6 90 minutes Grades 3-6 120 minutes Grades 3-6 60 minutes MCGRAW-HILL WONDERS. . 5 Minutes Grammar 15 Minutes Research and Inquiry SMALL GROUPS 35 Minutes ELL:Approaching Level: 15 Minutes 10
Araling Panlipunan Ikalawang Markahan - Modyul 5: Interaksiyon ng Demand at Supply Z est for P rogress Z eal of P artnership 9 Name of Learner: _ Grade & Section: _ Name of School: _ Alamin Ang pinakatiyak na layunin ng modyul na ito ay matutuhan mo bilang mag-aaral ang mahahalagang ideya o konsepto tungkol sa interaksiyon ng demand at supply. Mula sa mga inihandang gawain at .
