Summary Of Key Findings - Think Cultural Health

2y ago
17 Views
2 Downloads
515.19 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 7d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Cade Thielen
Transcription

Awareness, Knowledge, Adoption, and Implementationof the National CLAS Standards in Health and HealthCare Organizations Evaluation ProjectSummary of Key Findings

2Overview of Evaluation ProjectThe purpose of this evaluation project was to understand how health and health care organizationsbecome aware of, gain knowledge about, decide to adopt, and ultimately implement the NationalCLAS Standards.Overview of CLAS and the National CLAS StandardsCulturally and linguistically appropriate services (CLAS) are those services that are respectful of and responsive to the cultural andlinguistic needs of all individuals. Given the increasing cultural and linguistic diversity of the United States, CLAS is an important wayhealth and health care organizations can improve their provision of services to all individuals, regardless of race, ethnicity, language,socioeconomic status, and other cultural characteristics.The National CLAS Standards offers organizations a framework for providing CLAS. They were developed by the Office of Minority Healthat the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, who in 2015 sponsored an evaluation project that sought to better understandhow organizations use the National CLAS Standards.Evaluation Methodology & DesignA mixed-methods, case study approach was used to obtain a more in-depth understanding of how health and health care organizationsuse the National CLAS Standards. The evaluation project consisted of two phases.PHASE 1PHASE 2PurposeDescribe how health and health careorganizations should become aware of,gain knowledge about, and implementthe National CLAS StandardsDescribe the actual processes ofawareness, knowledge acquisition,adoption, and implementation of theNational CLAS StandardsSample39 CLAS & NCS stakeholders13 health and health careorganizations (6 public healthdepartments, 4 hospitals, 2ambulatory care centers, and 1 clinic)Data collection39 interviews with CLAS and NationalCLAS Standards stakeholders43 interviews with leadership atparticipating health and health careorganizations1,202 staff surveys collected13 websites reviewed4 sites visited and observed30 documents reviewed

3Summary of FindingsPhase 1 Findings from NCS and CLAS Stakeholders Organizations become aware of the National CLASStandards from government agencies and individuals withinorganizations tasked with ensuring compliance. CLAS activities such as hiring skilled interpreters; trainingstaff; and collecting race, ethnicity, and language data arecostly to organizations. Leadership support and CLAS champions can facilitate theimplementation of the National CLAS Standards. However, it’s more costly not to implement the Standardsbecause of adverse patient outcomes and the financialburden of errors and inefficiencies that CLAS can reduce. Lack of resources and guidance on how to interpret andimplement the National CLAS Standards are challenges toimplementing the Standards. Implementing the National CLAS Standards aligns qualitywith equity.Phase 2 Findings from Participating Organizations Staff view the National CLAS Standards positively. Most of the staff and leadership who had heard of theNational CLAS Standards learned about them from theircurrent place of employment. Leadership support is a key factor in an organization’sdecision to adopt the National CLAS Standards. Health and health care organizations implement theNational CLAS Standards by:–– Providing comprehensive language assistance servicesto populations–– Offering specialized training to workforce–– Completing organizational self-assessments to informneeds and gaps in the provision of CLAS–– Providing compensation to workforce to completeexternal training in CLAS-related issues–– Creating webpages specifically dedicated to an Office ofHealth Equity or Office of Health Disparities–– Offering wayfinding signage in languages other thanEnglish–– Referencing the availability of CLAS-related educationalopportunities in organizational documents Implementation challenges include a lack of resources suchas time, staffing, and funding. Implementation facilitators include leadership support,CLAS champions, and a supportive organizational culture. Organizational changes resulting from implementationinclude:–– Increased cultural and linguistic responsiveness topopulations served–– Improved cultural and linguistic competency of staff–– Increased organizational capacity to provide care–– Improved patient experience

4OutputsIn addition to reports on the Phase I and Phase II findings, the evaluation project resulted in aliterature review, a set of actionable implementation recommendations, and 13 organizationalsummary reports.A literature review on CLAS and the National CLAS Standards The team conducted three literature searches examining the organizational challenges, applicability, and policyimplications related to the National CLAS Standards or CLAS, and selected 55 articles for inclusion in the review. The literature review highlights a number of challenges in implementing the National CLAS Standards and/or providingCLAS, including issues related to the communication within health care organizations and the inconsistency ofaccountability measures.A set of actionable recommendations for organizational implementation The team developed a set of actionable recommendations to help guide organizations in their implementation of theNational CLAS Standards. The recommendations were developed from the literature review, the Blueprint, and Phase I interview data.National CLAS Standards summary reports for participating organizations The 13 participating organizations each received an individual report that described the organization’s activities relatedto CLAS and the National CLAS Standards and provide a tailored list of actionable recommendations. To validate the findings and recommendations, the team followed up with four organizations two months after theorganization received its report. Overall, the majority of organizations described the recommendations as useful andhad plans to implement several of them.

5ConclusionAs a result of this evaluation project, we learned that health and health care organizations provideculturally and linguistically appropriate services and implement the National CLAS Standards in avariety of ways.Specifically, among the participating organizations we found that: The ambulatory care centers invest in the implementation of the Standards by offering interpreters at no cost to the individual andproviding training on culturally and linguistically appropriate services. The clinic engages their local community in outreach activities and advocates for resources to support implementation. The hospitals promote a workforce that is representative of the communities they serve by employing pipeline programs to facilitatediversity recruitment and retention and employing advocates for patient rights. The public health departments promote the Standards internally and externally by creating and instituting CLAS-specific organizationalplans, providing CLAS-related training opportunities for staff, and publishing community health needs assessments and diversityreports online.We hope that the findings from this evaluation project are useful to advancing CLAS and the NationalCLAS Standards implementation efforts as we continue to learn more about how health and healthcare organizations become aware, learn more about, decide to use, and ultimately implement theNational CLAS Standards.Think Cultural act@thinkculturalhealth.hhs.govDeveloped by the Health Determinants & Disparities Practice, CSRA Inc. under contract with theOffice of Minority Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Summary of Findings Phase 1 Findings from NCS and CLAS Stakeholders Organizations become aware of the National CLAS Standards from government agencies and individuals within organizations tasked with ensuring compliance. Leadership support and CLAS champions can facilitate the implementation of the National CLAS Standards.

Related Documents:

Research Findings and Insights. Table of Contents . Executive Summary . Methodology . Key findings: Successes . Key findings: Challenges . Key findings: A new baseline . Recommendations: What agencies need to provide excellent, inclusive digital services . Mak

Summary of Findings identifying several key findings from our assessment at The Chapel. This report contains our best interpretation of our findings in our work with The Chapel. As a Christian consulting group, The Center provides these candid observations to help you think wisely and creatively.

Spartan Tool product. 2 1. Escape Key 2. Help Key 3. Standard Survey Key 4. WinCan Survey Key 5. Overlay Key 6. Overlay Style Key 7. Overlay Size Key 8. Footage Counter Key 9. Report Manager Key 10. Settings Key 11. Spa r e Function Key 1 12. Spa r e Function Key 2 13. Power Button 14. Lamp O 15. Lamp - Key 16. Lamp Key 17. V

1. 10,000 Reasons (Bless The Lord): key of E 2. Alive In Us: key of G 3. All Because Of Jesus: key of B 4. All Who Are Thirsty: key of D 5. Always: key of B 6. Arms Open Wide: key of D 7. At The Cross: key of E 8. Blessed Be Your Name: key of B 9. Break Free: key of A 10. Broken Vessels (Amazing Grace): key of G 11. Come As You Are: key of A 12 .

Chris Nitchie, Oberon Technologies chris.nitchie@oberontech.com book.ditamap key-1 key-2 . key-3 . key-1 key-2 key-3 book.ditamap key-1 scope-1 key-1 key-2 . key-3 . scope-2 . key-1 key-2 . key-3 . DITA 1.2 -

WHERE WE ARE ON TV 2020 – 2021 3 CONTENTS 4 From the office of Sarah Kate Ellis 7 Methodology 8 Executive Summary 10 Summary of Broadcast Findings 14 Summary of Cable Findings 17 Summary of Streaming Findings 20 Gender Representation 22 Race & Ethnicity 24 Representation of Black Characters 26 Representation of Latinx

Schedule of Findings and Questioned Costs I. Summary of Auditor’s Results 15 II. Financial Statement Findings 16 III. Federal Awards Findings and Questioned Costs 19 Summary Schedule of Prior Audit Findings 21 Supplemental Schedule of California State Department of Aging Exp

www.2id.korea.army.mil 2 Indianhead August 13, 2010 “Jeju Island, it takes about a half day to travel, so on a long weekend you can spend three full days touring, exploring, and enjoying yourself.” Pfc. Reginald Garnett HHC, 1-72th Armor OpiniOn “Gangneung is a great place to visit. It has a beautiful beach, Gyeongpo Beach, where many .