A Novel Incubator To Simulate The Natural Thermal .

3y ago
22 Views
2 Downloads
316.74 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 13d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Julius Prosser
Transcription

ARTICLE IN PRESSJournal of Thermal Biology 35 (2010) 138–142Contents lists available at ScienceDirectJournal of Thermal Biologyjournal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jtherbioA novel incubator to simulate the natural thermal environment ofsea turtle eggsJessica López-Correa a, Miguel Ángel Porta-Gándara b, Joaquı́n Gutiérrez b, Victor M. Gómez–Muñoz a,nabCentro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, I.P.N., PO Box 492, La Paz, B.C.S., MéxicoEngineering Group, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste, PO Box 128, La Paz, B.C.S., Méxicoa r t i c l e in f oa b s t r a c tArticle history:Received 10 November 2009Accepted 21 January 2010A novel sea turtle egg incubator was developed in which the heating element is placed above the clutch,which more closely simulates solar heating in nature. An electronic thermometer in conjunction with athermostat located in sand beneath a heater plate was used to obtain the desired temperature in theplaced eggs, as compared to previous methods of controlling global temperature within the interior of achamber. To test the new incubator, Lepidochelys olivacea eggs were incubated under different thermalconditions in order to identify the temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) period moreprecisely. Four incubation experiments were designed to test the performance of the incubator wherethe temperature was lowered from 32 to 28 1C during 60 h and then reestablished at 32 1C untilhatching occurred. A significant mean hatching success rate of 89.6% was obtained for all theexperiments. The main result from these preliminary findings was that the sex determination period toproduce males was reduced from 15 (days 15–30) to eight days (days 19–27). Overall, the incubatorprovides precise control and simulates a natural thermal environment that may improve control of TSDin sea turtles.& 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Keywords:Turtle eggs incubatorSex determinationLepidochelys olivacea1. IntroductionThe temperature of the sand during incubation of sea turtleeggs varies daily and seasonally and determines hatchling sex andinfluences embryonic survival and duration of incubation.Temperature-dependent sex determination (TSD) in sea turtleshas been documented for all extant species (Yntema andMrosovsky, 1980; Miller and Limpus, 1981; Rimblot et al., 1985;Morreale et al., 1982; Shaver et al., 1988; Dalrymple et al., 1985).For Lepidochelys olivacea, temperatures below 28 1C result inmales and above 32 1C in females, while temperatures between28 and 32 1C result in hatchlings of both sexes (McCoy et al.,1983). Due to physiological mechanisms of TSD in the sea turtleclutches, the temperatures should be measured as a routine partof the research work during the nesting period (Miller, 1999).Temperature data are extremely important to understand thenatural incubation processes. This is especially true in conservation programs, since nests are typically moved to protectedlocations where different thermal conditions prevail. In somecases hatching success in hatcheries is lower than in natural nestseven when hatcheries are constructed and supervised byconscientious staff. Also, hatchling sex ratios are often skewed,nCorresponding author. Tel.: 52 612 1225344, fax: 52 612 1225322.E-mail address: vgomez@ipn.mx (V.M. Gómez–Muñoz).0306-4565/ - see front matter & 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights ng on conditions in the hatchery; for instance, ValadezGonzález et al. (2000) sexed 320 hatchlings of the marine turtleLepidochelys olivacea and found a 7:3 sex ratio (230 females and90 males) at the nesting beach La Gloria, Jalisco, Mexico. Inaddition, Godfrey et al. (1999) estimated the overall seasonal sexratios of hatchling hawksbill turtles produced in Bahia, Brazil,during 6 nesting seasons, based on incubation durations. Theyfound a sex ratio greater than 90% female, which is significantlymore female-biased than estimated sex ratios of hatchlingloggerhead turtles from Bahia and Florida, USA. In contrast, ithas been reported that there is a danger of masculinizing turtleembryos by incubating eggs in artificial conditions, and attentionhas been drawn to the need for monitoring temperature inhatcheries to ensure that both sexes are produced (Mrosovsky andYntema, 1980).These problems have indicated a need to conduct research onthe effects of varying incubation temperatures with differenttypes of artificial incubators, both rustic and commercial. Forexample, Wallace et al. (2006) studied relationships between eggsize, egg components, and hatchling size in leatherback turtles(Dermochelys coriacea). To assess changes in egg mass duringincubation, they incubated 28 leatherback eggs from a singleclutch in four styrofoam Hova-Bators incubators; their resultsindicate that albumen might play a particularly significant role inleatherback embryonic development. Other incubators are commonly made of materials such as aluminum or plastic, with the

ARTICLE IN PRESSJ. López-Correa et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 35 (2010) 138–142eggs placed in racks or buried in sterile vermiculite. In these typesof incubators a constant temperature is set for the whole chamberbut they differ from the natural environment where the sunlighthits the sand surface and produces nonhomogeneous nesttemperatures that vary as a function of depth (Drake and Spotila,2002; Hewavisenthi and Parmenter, 2002).Incubator designs in the past were markedly different. Forexample, Lang et al. (1989) built an incubator for Crocodryluspalustris using commonly available components. The basic unitconsisted of a box of molded plastic foam insulation with anaquarium heater housed in an air conditioned insulated room, andused passive techniques to stabilize daily thermal fluctuations.Another incubator for Pacific leatherback turtle Dermochelyscoriacea, was constructed with a 5.0 cm thick styrofoam box withan aquarium heater, controlled by a thermostat made with amercury switch contact (Binckley et al., 1998).The aim of this project was to design, construct and evaluate aprogrammable electronic incubator that would control theincubation temperature more precisely and duplicate the naturalthermal environment encountered by sea turtle eggs. Theperformance of the incubator was tested using olive ridley(Lepidochelys olivacea) eggs, under different temperature scenarios.2. Electronic incubatorThe principal design feature of this programmable electronicincubator for sea turtle eggs was that measurement and controlwere decoupled, unlike previous designs where control andmeasurement occur within the same chamber. In this design theautomated temperature control was decoupled by burying anupper heater plate element in the sand above the temperaturesensor. This arrangement emulates heat transfer to the clutchfrom the sun. The incubation chambers consisted of 20-lpolystyrene boxes with several holes to permit oxygen interchange (Fig. 1).The programmable electronic incubator system (Fig. 2) wasimplemented with an 8-Bit CMOS PIC16F84A (U1) microcontroller,with processing speed of 20 MHz, 68 Bytes of RAM, 64 of dataEEPROM, 11 input/output pins and 2 dedicated serial RS-232driver/receivers MAX233A (U5). The PIC16F84A requires 5 Vdc at20 mA. The microcontroller is programmed using a personalcomputer connected via a serial RS-232 port to set the desiredclutch temperature. The microcontroller PIC16F84A measures and139controls the heater temperature with a thermostat incorporating asolid state temperature sensor DS1822 (U4). This sensor is a digitalthermometer with 72 1C accuracy over a 10 to 85 1C range.Data is read out over a 1-Wires serial bus in 12 bit, 2 s complementformat, with a resolution of one bit which corresponds to0.0625 1C. The DS1822 is powered by a 5 Vdc supply. Anothertemperature sensor DS1822 (U3) is included for measuring thetarget temperature in the sand, particularly where the eggs will beplaced. The temperature is displayed by the microcontroller on a2 16 character LCD (LCD1). To maintain the programmedtemperature, the microcontroller cycles the 0.1 m nanocarbonheater on and off. The 10 W heater plate (127 Vac, 60 Hz) iscontrolled by an MOC3011 optoisolator (U2) that is switched offwhen the desired temperature is reached at the thermostatbeneath the heating plate.3. Temperature calibration procedureFor the apparatus set up and the experimental design twoDS122 temperature electronic sensors and a 12 channel scanningthermocouple thermometer (Cole-Parmer model 92000-00) wereemployed with J type thermocouples with resolution of 0.1 1C.The 14 sensors were calibrated by means of an insulated vacuumflask filled with corn oil. The reference thermometer was a CT40mercury thermometer, with 0.1 1C divisions and a range 1 to51 1C. All 14 temperature sensors and the reference thermometerwere immersed in oil at two temperatures (20 and 40 1C) and thedifferences were adjusted using the calibration procedure recommended for the scanner and for the DS122 using the microcontroller software.4. ApparatusThe appropriate heater plate temperature was determinedexperimentally with the incubator box filled only with sand, toachieve the desired target temperature at a depth of 0.15 mmeasured with the DS122 temperature sensor. To obtain amasculinizing incubation temperature of 28 1C at the clutch zone,33 1C was programmed at the thermostat. Similarly to obtain afeminizing temperature of 32 1C the thermostat was set to 37 1C.The thermostat and the temperature sensor values were measured and recorded and transferred via the RS232 communicationport to the computer.This procedure allowed for control of the desired clutchtemperature by the setup temperature of the heater plate, whichwas programmed in the microcontroller. With this system, avariation around 70.3 1C beneath the heater plate (Fig. 3)produced a fluctuation about 70.1 1C in the target zone, due tothe attenuation effect of the sand.5. Incubator test experimentFig. 1. Diagram of the incubation system, including incubator, microcontroller,computer and temperature scanner.In order to evaluate the performance of the incubator, fourperiods of thermal incubation were studied to assess the sensitiveperiod of TSD. This experiment allowed for the evaluation of thesystem versatility and operative characteristics. The experimentconsisted of four incubators equipped to permit changing theclutch temperature from 32 to 28 1C during days 15–30 of theincubation period. After 60 hours the temperature was set back to32 1C. These values correspond to the feminizing and masculinizing temperatures for the olive ridley sea turtle (McCoyet al.,1983).

ARTICLE IN PRESS140J. López-Correa et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 35 (2010) 138–142Fig. 2. Incubator circuit diagram.Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtle eggs were collected onSeptember 28, 2008, from three nests, located at twodifferent beaches (231020 3800 N, 1091410 3600 W and 221580 1200 N,1091460 3700 W) in the San Jose del Cabo region, Baja California Sur,Mexico. The sand used to fill the incubator boxes was obtainedfrom natural nests. This procedure complies fully with international practices and national directives for nests protectioncomplying with Mexican laws and regulations. The issued permitwas SGPA/DGVS/06841/07 for the collection, transportation andincubation of the eggs.Each incubator box contained 24–32 eggs, laid in three stratathat were covered completely with sand; the upper layer of eggswas located at a distance of 0.15 m from the surface. The heaterplate was positioned at a 0.5 m depth in the sand. The clutchtemperatures were recorded every 10 min at the center of theclutch (Fig. 1).The sand humidity was maintained at 7% of wet-weightrelative to that of dry-weight for all the incubator boxes, using0.35 kg of water for each 5 kg of sand. The humidity was verifiedevery three days by means of a commercial humidity data logger(Decagon ProCheck with sensor EC-5). This value corresponds tothe natural nest environmental conditions for this species(Ackerman, 1997). The sex was determined by means ofhistological inspection of the gonads. The incubation temperatures for the four incubator boxes are shown in Fig. 4. Thedeveloped incubator successfully allowed for close automatedcontrol and monitoring of the clutch temperatures perexperimental requirements.For the stable intervals before, during and after temperatureschanges, the observed means and standard deviations of data areshown in Table 1. Higher temperatures before and after thecooling period were slightly above the target value of 32 1C,particularly in box 3, where a maximum bias of about 0.6 1C wasobtained. In all the boxes the target value was within theconfidence intervals despite the manipulation of the nest tocontrol humidity and the subsequent influence of ambienttemperature. Similarly, during the cooling periods, themaximum mean fluctuation was around 0.6 1C for box 2.Variations in the other boxes also put them above the desiredtemperature of 28 1C, with maximum standard deviation of 0.11in box 4.Table 2 shows the incubation results for each box.High percentages of hatching were found for all except forbox 4, where apparently the cooling period was too close today 30 of the incubation period. The observed sex ratiossuggest that the sex was determined in the intermediatedays (boxes 2 and 3), between days 19 and 27. For days17–20 for box 1 and days 27–30 for box 4, the change to amasculinizing temperature had no effect. In box 1, 50% of thegonads were undifferentiated in the hatchlings because it was notpossible to classify them as either males or females; theremaining gonads were only females. The entire incubationperiod was of 45 days for all boxes. More complete experimentsabout TSD are necessary to replicate these preliminaryobservations; in this work the main objective was to test theperformance of the incubator.

ARTICLE IN PRESSJ. López-Correa et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 35 (2010) 138–1426. ConclusionsThe results of this study using a novel programmableelectronic incubator show that it is possible to maintain asimulated heterogeneous thermal environment accurate enoughto successfully incubate sea turtle eggs. A significant finding ofthe test experiment was that the period of sex determination toproduce males was reduced from an interval of 15 days (days 15–30) as reported in the literature, to that of 8 days (days 19–27).35One of the advantages of this incubator is the way that clutchtemperatures are controlled. In this design, thermal inertia of thesand below the heating plate is included in the control scheme,approximating natural incubation conditions. In addition, thedesign is simple, economical ( o 150 USD) and can be adapted todifferent incubation process scenarios. For example, similarexperiments could be carried out to investigate if an analogousphenomenon occurs with females. To test this hypothesis that thesensitivity period or days to produce females can also be reduced,one could easily adjust incubation temperature with this systemfrom a masculinizing level (around 28 1C) to a feminizing one(around 32 1C).targetheater34343230282633Temperature ( C)323130Clutch temperature ( C)29282726257.157.207.25Time (h)7.304038Temperature ( C)34323028263432302826343230282615 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30Incubation daytargetheater39141373635Fig. 4. Time course of clutch temperatures obtained in each incubator at differentcut-off days.343332Table 1Mean stable temperatures before, during and after the temperature change from32 to 28 1C (mean 7standard deviation).31307.157.207.25Time (h)07.30Fig. 3. Thermostat temperatures (discontinuous line) and target temperatures(continuous line) to produce males (a) and females (b), with the box filled onlywith sand.BoxBeforeDuringAfter123432.4 7 0.232.3 7 0.132.6 7 0.232.4 7 0.228.4 7 0.028.6 7 0.128.3 7 0.128.5 7 0.132.6 70.432.4 70.232.6 70.132.3 7 0.0Table 2Hatch rates and sex ratios of Lepidochelys olivacea sea turtle eggs artificially incubated.Box1234# EggsIncubation cut-off daysHatching success (%)Sex ratio (%) M:F:U2424233217 2019 2223 2627 3092.396.095.874.40:50:50100:0:0100:0:00:100:0M males; F females; U undifferentiated.

ARTICLE IN PRESS142J. López-Correa et al. / Journal of Thermal Biology 35 (2010) 138–142ReferencesAckerman, R.A., 1997. The nest environment and the embryonic development ofsea turtles. In: Lutz, P.L., Musick, J.A. (Eds.), The Biology of Sea Turtles. CRCPress, Boca Raton, FL, USA, pp. 83–106.Binckley, C.A., Spotila, J.R., Wilson, K.S., Paladino, F.V., 1998. Sex determination andsex ratios of Pacific leatherback turtles, Dermochelys coriacea. Copeia 1998,291–300.Dalrymple, J.H., Hampp, J.C., Wellins, D.J., 1985. Male-biased sex ratio in a coldnest of a hawksbill sea turtle Eretmochelys imbricata. J. Herpetol. 19,158–159.Drake, L., Spotila, J.R., 2002. Thermal tolerances and the timing of sea turtlehatchling emergence. J. Therm. Biol. 27 (1), 71–81.Godfrey, M.H., D’Amato, A.F., Marcovaldi, M.A., Mrosovsky, N., 1999. Pivotaltemperature and predicted sex ratios for hatchling hawksbill turtles fromBrazil. Can. J. Zool. 77 (9), 1465–1473.Hewavisenthi, S., Parmenter, D.C.J., 2002. Incubation Environment and NestSuccess of the Flatback Turtle (Natator depressus) from a Natural NestingBeach. Copeia 2002, 302–312.Lang, J.W., Andrews, H., Whitaker, R., 1989. Sex determination and sex ratios inCrocodylus palustris. Am. Zool. 29, 935–952.McCoy, C.J., Vogh, R.C., Censky, E.J., 1983. Temperature controlled sex determination in sea turtle Lepidochelys olivacea. J. Herpetol. 17 (4), 404–406.Miller, J.D., 1999. Determining Clutch Size and Hatching Success. In: Eckert, K.L.,Bjorndal, K., Abreu-Grobois, F.A., Donnelly, M. (Eds.), Research andManagement Techniques for the Conservation of Sea Turtles. IUCN/SSCMarine Turtle Specialist Group Publication 4, Blanchard, Pennsylvania, USA,pp. 124–129.Miller, J.D., Limpus, C.J., 1981. Incubation period and sexual differentiation in thegreen turtle, Chelonia mydas L. In: Banks, C.B., Martin, A.A. (Eds.), Proceedingsof the Melbourne Herpetological Symposium the Royal Zoological Gardens,Melbourne, pp. 66–73.Morreale, S.J., Ruiz, G.J., Spotila, J.R., Standora, E.A., 1982. Temperature dependentsex determination: current practices threaten conservation of sea turtles.Science 216, 1245–1247.Mrosovsky, N., Yntema, C.L., 1980. Temperature dependence of sexual differentiation in sea turtles: Implications for conservation practices. Biol. Conserv. 18,59–65.Rimblot, F., Fretey, J., Mrosovsky, N., Lescure, J., Pieau, C., 1985. Sexualdifferentiation as function of the incubation temperature of eggs in the seaturtle Dermochelys coriacea (Vandelli, 1761). Amphibia-Reptilia 6, 83–92.Shaver, D.J., Owens, D.W., Chaney, A.H., Caillouet, C.W., Burchfield Jr. P., Marquez,R., 1988. Styrofoam box and beach temperatures in relation to incubation andsex ratios of Kemp’s ridley sea turtles. In: Schroeder, B.A. (Ed.), Proceedings ofthe Eighth Annual Workshop on Sea Turtle Conservation and Biology. NOAATechnical Memorandum, NMFS-SEFC-214, pp. 103–108.Valadez-González, C., Silva-Bátiz, F.A., Hernández-Vázquez, S, 2000. Sex ratio ofmarine turtle (Lepidochelys olivacea) hatchlings in incubation corrals at LaGloria nesting beach, Jalisco, Mexico. Bol. Cent. Invest. Biol. Univ. Zulia 34 (3),305–313.Wallace, B.P., Sotherland, P.R., Tomillo, P.S., Bouchard, S.S., Reina, R.D., Spotila, J.R.,Paladino, F.V., 2006. Egg components, egg size, and hatchling size inleatherback turtles. Comp. Biochem. Physiol., A: Mol. Integr. Physiol 145 (4),524–532.Yntema, C.L., Mrosovsky, N., 1980. Sexual differentiation in hatchling loggerhead(Caretta caretta) incubated at different controlled temperatures. Herpetologica36, 33–36.

The PIC16F84A requires 5 Vdc at 20 mA. The microcontroller is programmed using a personal computer connected via a serial RS-232 port to set the desired clutch temperature. The microcontroller PIC16F84A measures and controls the heater temperature with a thermostat incorporating a solid state temperature sensor DS1822 (U4). This sensor is a digital

Related Documents:

control of the incubator could affect the temperature and humidity of the incubator to become higher or lower. In this project, a small bulb is located inside the incubator to provide suitable temperature for the quail eggs. In order to maintain the good condition of humidity and ventilation, the incubator is

5 05 FINANCING AN INCUBATOR TRAINEE MANUAL PART 2 Suite 2 Business Incubator Operations INTRODUCTION TO THE TRAINING PROGRAM This is the trainee manual for Module 5 Part 2 - out of 11 modules in total - of infoDev’s State-of-the- Art Business Incubation Training Program for Business Incubator Managers in Developing Countries.

The variability of the incubator temperature that will be observed over a one-hour period after incubator temperature equilibrium has been reached. TEMPERATURE RISING TIME. The time required for the incubator temperature to rise 11 , when t

incubator retain heat for the infant. To run this test, the incubator was heated to 37ºC, unplugged and then the ambient air temperature was monitored over time. The ambient air in the incubator dropped an average of 2.0

cost homemade egg incubator for production of chicks and ducklings. He has developed a low cost homemade egg incubator where 200 eggs can be incubated at a time. Developmental cost of this incubator is approximately Rs. 5000. One of the important feature of this incubator is electricity can be substituted by kerosene lamp.

Smart Egg Incubator is 32cm height x 45cm width x47cm long. For this, 4 bulbs were placed around the wall inside of the Smart Egg Incubator. The bulb usage is 40 Watt’s that supply heat to the egg. Figure 8: The casing box for Smart Egg Incubator Refer to Figure 8 above; it is show about the 4 dimension c

2.2 Description of the Incubator The incubator, fig. 1 was made of wood and has height of 2050 mm, breadth 1110 mm and width 630 mm. It is a forced draft type incubator in which a fan was used to circulate the air, which gives a uniform temperature throughout the machine. This helps to overcome the tempera

2 The Farley Center Farm Incubator–Introduction among these communities to recruit both incubator participants and incubator staff. In keeping with the Farley Center’s social justice and partnership ethics, all decisions about the function and mission of the