EPA &EPA June - NREL

2y ago
18 Views
2 Downloads
4.97 MB
71 Pages
Last View : 26d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Tia Newell
Transcription

&EPAAUnited StatesEnvironmental ProtectionAgencyU.S. EPA401 M Street SWWashington, DC 20460EPA 832-R-95-003June 1995U.S. Departmentof EnergyNational RenewableEnergy LaboratoryGolden, C O 80401NREL/TP- 430-7974DE95009216Case Studies in Residual Use andEnergy Conservation at WastewaterTreatment PlantsInteragencyEnergy and EnvironmentalResearch ReportU.S. Environmental Protection AgencyOffice of Wastewater ManagementWashington, DCU.S. Department of EnergyEnergy Efficiency, Conservationand Renewable EnergyWashington, DC

NOTICEThis report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government.Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes anywarranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibilityfor the accuracy, compjeteness,or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use wouldnot infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, orservice by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or othetwise does not necessarily constitute or imply itsendorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. Theviews and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the UnitedStates government or any agency thereof.Available to DOE and DOE contractors from:Office of Scientific and Technical Information (OSTI)P.O. Box 62Oak Ridge, TN 37831Prices available by calling (615) 576-8401Available to the public from:National Technical Information Service (NTIS)U S . Department of Commerce5285 Port Royal RoadSpringfield, MA 22161(703) 487-4650I*% Printed on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 10% postconsumer waste

EPA Review NoticeThis report has been reviewed by the U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency, and approved for publication. Approval does not sign@ that thecontents necessarily reflect the views and policy of the agency, nor doesmention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsementor recommendation for use.This document is available to the public through the National TechnicalInformation Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161.

CONTENTSAcknowledgements .iiiForward. .vIntroduction .IBackground * Basics of Biogas Generation and Use * In-Plant Applications forBiogas * Precautions for Use of Unscrubbed BiogasCounty Sanitation Districts of Orange County .9Facility Description * Description of the Technologies * Process Modifications *Pretreatment Program Effects on Energy Conservation * Benefits of theEnergy Consetvation ProgramCity of Los Angeles Hyperion Wastewater Treatment Plant. . 17Facility Description * Energy Recovery from Biogas * Energy Recovery fromBiosolids * Process Modifications * Senefits of the Energy ConservationProgramSunnyvale Water Pollution Control Plant. .27Facility Description * Description of the Technologies * Operation andMaintenance * Landfill Gas Production * Biosolids DewateringSanford Big Buffalo Creek WWTP, North Carolina .35Facility Description * Energy Conservation Audit * Description of theTechnologies * Process Modifications * Financial BenefitsSeattle Metro Renton Water Reclamation Ptant. .43Facility Description * Energy Recovery from Biogas * The Metro ThemProgram * Applicability to Other Systems * Benefits of the EnergyConservation ProgramOther Promising Technologies .53Anaerobic Wastewater Treatment * Lake County Southeast Geysers EffluentPipeline * Biomass-Enhanced Digester Gas ProductionFactors that Contribute to Success .i59

The Influence of Financial Factorsm. . . . . . , . . . . . .m . . - . . . . .61Biosolids: Onsite Use versus Offsite Reuse * Biogas: Onsite Use versus OffsiteSale * Energy from Effluent: Purchase versus Contractual EquipmentConclusions . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . . . " . .Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .- . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .* .iiI6365

AcknowledgementsThis report was prepared by Science Applications International Corporation under NationalRenewable Energy Laboratory Subcontract No. YAE-3 -1 3480-01 for the U.S. Departmentof Energy, and Contract No. 68-C8-0066,WA No. C-4-73(M) with the U.S.Environmental Protection Agency.We thank the staff and management of each of the wastewater treatment plants involved inthis study for cheehlly providing infomation and graphics.I111

Foreword'public support for water qualityimprovement has placedincreasing demands onwastewater treatment plants in the yearssince passage of the Clean Water Act in1972. The public's expectations and theresulting new environmental legislation(at national, state, and local levels) haveled to new programs and increasedexpenditures.As a result, WWTP managers continuallytackle issues associated with broadeningenvironmental concerns. These concernsinclude aquatic habitat protection,wastewater reclamation, air quality issues,industrial waste disposal, biosolids reuse,and others up to and including globalclimate change. Many plant managers aredealing with all these issues and thecorollary need for finding.The premise of this document is thatW V P s can address environmentalmandates in an integrated frameworkbased on energy conservation, throughthe use of renewable resources. As theexamples presented herein show, activitiesthat conserve energy also reduce pollutionand costs. Energy conservation is aparticularly appropriate goal for WWTPs,which exist to reduce pollution.WWTps are among the few communityinstitutions that are efficiently designed tomanage renewable resources.Conventionally, renewable resources areconsidered to include water, air and soil,wild and domesticated organisms, forests,rangelands, cultivated land, marine andfieshwater ecosystems that supportfisheries, and other aspects of the naturalenvironment. However, human ability tomanage these scattered and generallypoorly understood resources is in mostrespects very limited. In contrast,WWTPs have collection systems toconvey the resource to a single point.Treatment processes then separate solidsfiom the water fraction, producingdifferent resource streams for reuse.Many plants now profitably obtainmethane for in-plant energy productionfiom the biosolids fiaction. Examples ofsuch facilities are discussed in thisdocument. However, some plants aremoving forward to generate energy fioma combination of landfill gas and digestergas (as seen in Sunnyvale, CA) orproduction of digester gas for offsite sale(Seattle Metro), or biosolids oxidation toproduce energy for onsite and offsite uses(Los Angeles' Hyperion plant). CreativeW W T P S are also solving communitywaste disposal problems by placing highstrength biowastes into anaerobicdigesters. These facilities benefit fiom theresulting increased production ofmethane.Energy can also be obtained fiomwastewater effluent, as demonstrated bySeattle Metro and The Boehg Company.By using Seattle Metro's effluent forcooling via heat exchangers, instead ofbuilding cooling towers, Boeing hasconserved potable water and preservedthe City viewscape. Any WWTP facedwith building pipelines for waterreclamation purposes can explore this u.seof effluent. The potential for energy

By integrating wastewater treatment withconservation by using effluent in heatexchangers is enormous; the U.S.Department of Energy has estimated thatspace heating and cooling account for 34percent of commercial energy usage and46 percent of residential usage. Greatcornunity benefit would be obtainedeven if only a small part of this usagewere defkayed.energy conservation, the W " P sdescribed in this document have met thechallenges of new environmentalregulations. These facilities haveachieved benefits in cost savings whileenhancing their ability to comply withregulations. Their activities illustratehighly effective pollution preventionstrategies.vi

IntroductionThe U. S. EnvironmentalProtection Agency (EPA) andthe National RenewableEnergy Laboratory (NREL)for theU. S. Department of Energy (DOE)funded a study to document energyconservation activities and their effectson operation costs, regulatorycompliance, and process optimizationat several wastewater treatment plants(WWTPS).Beginning in the mid-l970's, industry andgovernment has perceived an increasing needfor energy conservation efforts. While waterconservation has long been a goal, recentinitiatives requiring municipal pollutionprevention programs support the need to seekinnovative solutions that address bothconcerns in a holistic manner.The purpose of this report is to review theefforts of wastewater treatment facilitiesthat use residuals as hels. Case historiesare presented for facilities that have takenmeasures to reduce energy consumptionduring wastewater treatment. Most of theWWTPs discussed in this report haveretrofitted existing facilities to achieveenergy conservation. The case studies ofenergy conservation measures found noeffects on the facilities' ability to complywith NPDES permits. Indeed, energyconservation activities enhanceenvironmental compliance in severalways.conditioning, biosolids incineration,aerobic digestion, advanced wastewatertreatment, and use of aeration ponds.Anaerobic digestion uses comparativelysmall amounts of energy, but also showsgreat potential for energy savings becauseits energy requirements are easily reducedthrough the use of biogas for heating, thetechnology to do so is commerciallyavailable, and the economics is almostalways favorable.A survey conducted by the IllinoisAssociation of Wastewater Agenciesfound that the annual energy costs forwastewater treatment plants in Illinoisranged fiom 20 to 35 percent of 1990operation and maintenance (O&M) costs.In comparison to this figure, the CountySanitation Districts of Orange County,which has implemented a comprehensiveenergy conservation program, expects tospend only 6 percent ofits total O&Mbudget on energy during fiscal year 1993-94.BackgroundStudies conducted previously by DOEidentified the wastewater treatmentprocesses with the highest energy usage.These processes exhibit the greatestpotential for energy savings, and includeactivated sludge, biosolids dewatering and1

Residuals Use and Energy CanserVationThe DOE studies found that WWTPmanagers' primary concern is to meetdischarge requirements. Energyconservation, when considered at all, isoften of secondary importance. Now,many WWTP managers are finding thatenergy conservation and use of residualsas fuels can actually enhanceenvironmental compliance. Theexperiences of some of these facilities arepresented as examples to other agenciesconsidering whether to implement suchtechnologies.L cal objectives nd conditions, however,will decide the use made of biogas at aparticular plant.In-plant uses are those that result in thebiogas being consumed completely withinthe wastewater treatment plant, either asprimary or backup fbel. Uses includeheling boilers in process heatingoperations and space heating and cooling,engine-driven machinery, enginegenerators for electricity generation,solids incinerators, boilers forpasteurization of digested biosolids, gasfired biosolids dryers, and generation ofelectricity by steam turbines and fuel cells.Figure 1 provides a schematic of in-plantuses. These uses are described in detail inthe next section.Basics of Biogas Generation and UseAnaerobic digestion is one of the mostwidely used processes of wastewaterbiosolids stabilization. The processinvolves bacterial decomposition of theorganic constituents of the biosolids in theabsence of oxygen. The products ofanaerobic digestion, apart fiom solids,include water and a gas composed ofmethane, carbon dioxide, hydrogensulfide, and other minor gaseouscompounds. This "biogas" has a heatvalue of approximately 550 Btu/ft3, about60 percent of the heat value of naturalUse ofwaste heat recovery increasesenergy efficiency in the system, and is ofparticular value whenever in-plant useinvolves the operation of equipment notprimarily designed to produce heat (Le.,engines, incinerators, turbines, etc.). Asthe case histories in this studydemonstrate, he1 energy efficiency can beincreased fiom 30 to 70 percent byrecovering heat for process or spaceheatinglcooling requirements. Recoveryof biogas should always be supplementedwith waste gas burners, or flares,toensure that excess gas is controlled withthe smallest environmental impact.gas-Biogas may be used either off-site orwithin the plant to improve energyefficiency ofwastewater treatmentprocesses. Both possibilities should beconsidered when designing new treatmentfacilities or upgrading existing ones.2

Residuals Use and Energy ConservationThe case study presented below of SeattleMetro's Renton Reclamation Plantdescribes one such use. Generally, it isless practical to process biogas for offsiteuses if the gas can be used in the plant.Offsite, biogas can be used to createeither energy or chemicals that are soldfor use external to the plant. There aremany potential offsite uses for biogas, asindicated in the schematic in Figure 2.Figure 1: Onsite uses for biogas3

Residuals Use and Energy Conservationheat for space heating and cooling, (3)powering engines used to drive equipmentdirectly, (4) powering engines used withgenerators to drive remote equipment,and (5) powering engines used withgenerators to produce general purposeelectrical power.In-Plant Applications for BiogasBiogas use can result in significant energysavings. Production depends on plantwastewater flows and suspended solidsloading, rather than on warm weather orother outside variables, as long as thedigester environment is uniform.The five most adaptable in-plant uses forbiogas are as a he1 for (1) generating heatfor treatment processes, (2) generating621B-02Figure 2: Offsite uses for biogas5

Residuals Use and Energy Consemationthe need for standby electric power tooperate this equipment during periods ofpeak load. The electric power company,in turn, can make this peaking poweravailable to someone else. Any type oftreatment plant can use direct enginedriven equipment.Process HeatingA plant that uses anaerobic digestion forbiosolids stabilktion should include aprocess-heating system that can maintainthe contents of the digesters at theiroptimum temperature (usually 95" F).Such a system should maintain boilertemperatures above 212' F, and hot waterin the biosolids heat exchanger should notbe allowed to rise above 160' F. Attemperatures more than 160' F thebiosolids heat exchanger may cake withbiosolids, which quickly ruins the system'sheat transfer coefficient. Other uses ofprocess heat include chlorine and s u bdioxide evaporation and raw biosolids andscum preheating.Indirect Engine DrivesIndirect engine-driven equipment providesthe designer with an exceptionally flexiblesystem. It can be used (1) to reduce peakdemands of major equipment that isremote fkom the source of fuel andmaintenance, (2) to drive both local andremote equipment, (3) to achieveoperational speed variability of remotemajor equipment, and (4) to use enginegenerators as both indirect engine driversand general-purpose electrical generators.The extra flexibility obtained by usingindirect engine-driven equipment may bethe difference between efficient andinefficient use of biogas.Space Heating.The use of space heating can be expandedeffectively to include space cooling.When combined with absorptiverefigeration units, the hot waterproduced with the biogas can be arrangedto produce chilled water, which can thenbe piped around the plant for space andequipment cooling. Often such spacecooling can increase savings byeliminating the need for excessiveventilation.General Purpose Power GenerationAs more plants are modified or enlargedto include secondary treatment processes,efficient use of biogas will require greateruse of in-plant, general-purpose powergeneration. Biogas production fiomplants involving secondary treatment canbe sufficient to provide up to 60 to 80percent of the plant's total power needs,depending on the actual treatmentprocesses involved. In those plants withminimal process pumping, biogas mayprovide nearly all of the power needs.Engines for generating plant powerusually operate at slower speeds andDirect Engine DrivesDirect engine-driven equipment usually isemployed in plants whose majorhorsepower demands are required onlyduring peak flow or load conditions, forexample, raw wastewater pumps, effluentpumps, and aeration blowers. The use ofdirect engine-driven equipment eliminates7

Residuals Use and Energy Conservationscrubbing. Any boiler or engine usingunscrubbed biogas must be operated attemperatures above 212"F. Unless thecombustion temperature is maintained at ahigh level, exhaust temperatures will notbe sufficient to maintain non-condensingconditions Within the collection anddischarge conduits. The carbon dioxideand hydrogen sulfide in the spent biogasbecomes acidic and extremely corrosivewhen combined with water. Exhaustcondensation must be eliminated fromequipment heled by unscrubbed biogas.Blending biogas with a gas having lowerhydrogen sulfide content can reduce thecorrosivity concerns associated withunscrubbed biogas.lower mean effkctive pressures. Suchheavy-duty engines can generate powerreliably for many years.Precautions for Use of UnscrubbedBiogasBiogas contains 60 to 70 percentmethane, 30 to 40 percent carbon dioxide,up to % percent hydrogen sulfide andother inert gases and water vapor. ManyWWTPs clean up the biogas before use toremove contaminants. Sunnyvale, forinstance, uses simple baffle platecondensers to remove moisture fiombiogas. Biogas fiom Hyperion'sanaerobic digesters contains 60 to 100ppm of hydrogen sulfide, which wouldproduce unacceptable emissions when thegas is burned. Therefore, Hyperion treatsthe biogas in a Stretford unit to reducethe suhr content to less than 40 ppm ofhydrogen sulfide. Seattle Metro removescarbon dioxide fiom biogas produced atthe Renton WWTP before sale to thelocal gas utility for offsite use. Biogaswhich does not meet the standard of 99percent purity is rejected by the utility.Biogas heat recovefy systems must beisolated from each other. The upsets(production rate changes) of one systemmust never be allowed to affect theoperation of another. This isolation canbest be accomplished by using separatesteam condensers to transfer the boiler orengine heat into a common hot-watercirculation system. The system provides aflexible method of transferring heatthroughout the plant. Using individualsecondary parallel heat loops to points ofneed assures that the final suppiy of hotwater is at optimum temperature.Depending on local factors and the finaluse intended for the biogas, scrubbing isnot always necessary. However, certainprecautions should be considered in theevent that biogas is used without8

Residuals Use and Energy CansexvationCounty SanitationDistricts of OrangeCountyThis section discusses the energyThe 2020 Vision Plan incorporates avariety of energy consewation activities,including lighting, building heating andcooling, and generation of electricityonsite.programs implemented at the twowastewater treatment plants operated bythe County Sanitation Districts of OrangeCounty.Facility DescriptionThe County Sanitation Districts ofOrange County (CSDOC) provideswastewater treatment for a population ofabout 2.1 million people. CSDOCoperates two treatment plants, with acombined average wastewater flow ofabout 235 MGD. Each plant usesadvanced primary treatment with ferricchloride and anionic polymer addition inthe primary basins. About 50 percent ofthe plants' flow receives secondarytreatment. The plants discharge to theocean through a common outfa11 whichhas a 301(h) waiver.'In June 1993 CSDOC put the CentralPower Generation System (Central Gen)on-line. Central Gen incorporates stateof-the-art techniques to reclaim energyfiom biogas. This system has beeninstalled at both treatment plants.Currently, CSDOC does not purchase anyelectricity, as all of its electricity needs aresupplied by onsite manufacture of energyfiom a combination of biogas and naturalgas. CSDOC projects that by the year2010 enough biogas will be produced tocompletely fie1 all the generators.Other aspects of CSDOC's energyconservation program include improvingoperator skills, motivating and trainingoperators to be "energy aware," providingcomputerized power management data,optimizing equipment for maximumefficiency, and providing managementtechnical skills, support, and funding.CSDOC has an energy conservationcommittee to review existing measuresand propose new possibilities for savings.Operation of processes at the treatmentplants is aggressive. CSDOC hasimplemented a lighting conservationprogram and a summer peak savings program.CSDOC has carried out various energyconservation techniques for several years.For instance, the facility uses biogas toheat the digesters and to fuel someengines that run pumps and blowers.However, the recovery system did nothave the capacity to use all the gasproduced by the digesters, and the excesswas burned off In 1989, CSDOCcodified formal energy conservation plansin the "2020Vision Plan."9

Residuals Use and Energy ConservationDescription of the Technologies:Central Power Generation SystemCentral Gen consists of a total of eightinternal combustion engines fbeled byboth biogas and natural gas. The enginesdrive generators to produce electricitythat is then used to operate the treatmentplants. These engines were specificallydesigned to reduce emissions from theengine exhaust and to use all the gasproduced by the digesters. Power outputis 5 megawatts at the Fountain Valleyplant (Plant 1) and 7 megawatts at theHuntington Beach plant (Plant 2).Plant 2 has the greater energy demand (8megawatts), due mainly to the presence ofthe outfd pumping station at this plant.Plant 1 uses about 4 megawatts. Now,allbiogas fiom Plant 1 is exported viapipeline to Plant 2 for use, and the Plant 1Central Gen operates entirely on naturalgas*The three engine generators instalIed atCSDOC's Plant 1 are Cooper BessemerModel LSVB-12SGC. The five enginegenerators installed at CSDOC's Plant 2are Cooper Bessemer Model LSVB16SGC. Plant 1 engines are rated at2,500 kilowatts each, and those at Plant 2are rated at 3,000kilowatts. At 7,200Btuhorsepower, the engines are highlyefficient.The engine units consist of an electricalgenerator, a spark ignition gas-fbeledinternal combustion engine, enginecooling equipment with automatic andmanual controls, and engine exhaust andjacket water heat recovery equipment andcontrols. AU engines are the stratifiedcombustion charge type, with separateprecombustion chambers designed toreduce exhaust pollutant emissions. Thegenerators' design efficiency is rated at aminimum of 96.5 percent at ratedconditions.Each engine has a fuel-injection systemsuitable for accommodating biogas andnatural gas. A fie1 gas cutoffvalve andtotalizing flowmeter are provided for bothfkels and each engine. The engines canuse either biogas, natural gas, or anycombination of the two he1 types. Theengine he1 control system can rapidly andautomatically adjust the heyair ratio inresponse to changes in engine load or fuelheating value. The engine design enablesthe fuel control system to accomplishthese adjustments in a manner that doesnot reduce engine efficiency or result ingreater pollutant emissions, even at a fie1value fluctuation rate ofup to plus orminus 100 Btu per cubic foot per minute.Three-stage biogas filters to remove oil,water mist, and solids are installed on theengine fbel supply piping. The threestages consist of: (1) mechanicalcentrifbgal separation, (2) separation bycoalescing and entrainment, and (3) finalfiltration through a porous-fiberglassmedium. These filters are designed toremove 99 percent of all dispersed liquid,five microns and larger, and a minimum of98 percent of all solids, one micron andlarger. A differential pressure gauge ispresent to indicate when cleaning orreplacement of the filters is necessary.

Residuals Use and Energy Consemationand a consulting firm provided operatortraining for Central Gen.Each engine generator unit has anelectronic governing system for automaticsynchronization, load sharing, and loadregulation. An air fuel ratio controller isalso present on each engine tocontinuously monitor the air fuel ratio.Systems that use exhaust sensors can besusceptible to damage by components ofbiogas, so CSDOC specified that controlof the air fbel ratio must be maintained bymonitoring air manifold temperature andpressure and engine load instead. Enginesare also supplied with various protectiveand safety devices and monitoring andmeasuring devices to ensure safe andefficient operation. Equipment vendorsDescription of the Technologies:Waste Heat RecoveryThe facility uses engine heat to heat thedigesters and for some heating andcooling needs of buildings. The ability torecover and use "waste" heat givesCentral Gen greater thermal efficiencythan that of Southern California Edison(60% compared to 30%). Each enginegenerator has a minimum recoverablethermal output at rated load as foliows:Engine exhaust4.395.27Engine jacket water1.902.30primaries. This resulted in an increase inbiogas production, because the energycontent of the solids recovered from theprimaries is greater than that for solidsrecovered from secondq treatment. InAPT,chemicals are added to the primarysettling facilities. Currently, ferricchloride and polymer are added for about12 to 13 hours daily. The facility hasconducted experiments with chemicaladdition on a continuous 24-hour per daybasis, and found it to be a cost-effectivemeans to increase biogas production.Central Gen has more than adequatecapacity to use all the biogas produced byThe jacket water heat recovery systemtransfers heat to a plant-wide circulatingpressurized hot water system. Theexhaust heat recovery system is designedto reduce the engine exhaust gastemperature to a minimum of 380' Fwhile generating 125 psig dry saturatedsteam.Process Modifications: AdvancedPrimary TreatmentApplication of advanced primarytreatment (APT)at both plants hasincreased solids and BOD removal in theIt

Residuals Use and Energy Conservationthe facility, and as more biogas isproduced, less natural gas needs to bepurchased. Plant s t d estimates thatbiogas production increases between 12and 18 percent because of APT. Thelower figure of 12 percent is gained with16 hours per day APT at 20 mgL femcchloride and 0.15 mg/L polymer. Thehigher figure of 18 percent is obtainedwith increased chemical addition (femcchloride at 30 mg/L and polymer at 0.22mg/L)*a0aDissolved air flotation (DAF)process reductionsDAF fan turned offTransformer turned offReduced operation of aeratorsDewatering fatl turned offElimination of scrubberrecirculation pumps associatedwith obsolete scrubbers.Lighting energy consemtionUse of gravity feed reduced the need forpumping, and the facility realizedsubstantial energy savings by insulatingthe digester domes.APT has reduced the need for secondarytreatment, resulting in energy savings.Before APT, the primary treatmentprocess removed about 65 percent oftotal suspended solids; with APT theplants achieve 80 percent removal.Increasing the amount of primary solidssent to the anaerobic digesters results inincreased biogas production, equivalent to3,000 kilowatts.Pretreatment Program Effects omEnergy ConservationImposing mass-based Iimits on BODdischarges fiom industrid users hascontributed to the Districts' ability toreduce its energy use. In the past, theplant observed dramatic increases ininfluent BOD during the food processingseason. One industry alone discharged upto 70,000 pounds of BOD per day overthe two to three month season. CSDOCnow firnits discharges from foodprocessing industries to 10,000 poundsper day average, and 15,000 pounds perday maximum BOD. Plant staff hascalculated the total reduction in BODdischarged by industry to be equivalent to12 MGD of secondary treatment onaverage, peaking at up to 50 MGD ofsecondary treatment for several weeks ata time. The staff estimates that energyuse is reduced by 500 kilowatts per yearby these efforts.Another benefit achieved through APT isreduction of the amount of biosolids thatmust be disposed offsite. Less biomass isproduced in the secondary process.Therefore, less biosolids must be hauledoffsite, resulting in reduced vehicularemissions and conservation ofnonrenewable fuels.Other ModificationsBesides advanced primary treatment,CSDOC has implemented other processchanges designed to reduce energyconsumption. These include thefollowing:12

Residuals Use and Energy CoaSenationBenefits of the Energy ConservationProgram: Air Emissions Reductionsallowances on the results of the riskassessments.CSDOC cites concerns with meeting airemissions requirements as one of twofactors driving their energy conservationefforts. Southern California airregulations are among the most stringentin the country. Both CSDOC andHypenon are subject to local regulationspromulgated by the South Coast AirQuality Management District(SCAQMD). SCAQMD regulatesemissions of sulfur dioxides fromstationary source internal combustionengines, and sets limits on the allowablecontent of sulfur in gaseous fuels.SCAQMD also requires wastewatertreatment plants to develop riskassessments, and bases influent volumeSubstitution of biogas for natural gas hasenhanced the CSDOC plants' ability tomeet air quality requirements. Becausebiogas has a heat value approximatelyone-half that of natural ga

United States U.S. EPA EPA 832-R-95-003 &EPA Environmental Protection 401 M Street SW June 1995 Agency Washington, DC 20460 A U.S. Department National Renewable NREL/TP- 430-7974 of Energy Energy Laboratory DE95009216 Golden, CO 80401 Case Studies in Residual Use and Energy Conservation at Wastewater Treatment Plants Interagency

Related Documents:

Cover Photos: (left to right) photo by Pat Corkery, NREL 16416, photo from SunEdison, NREL 17423, photo by Pat Corkery, NREL 16560, photo by Dennis Schroeder, NREL 17613, photo by Dean Armstrong, NREL 17436, photo by Pat Corkery, NREL 17721. . Interior Ambient Lighting .

Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (clockwise, left to right) NREL 51934, NREL 45897, NREL 42160, NREL 45891, NREL 48097, NREL 46526. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content

free via . www.OSTI.gov. Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (clockwise, left to right) NREL 51934, NREL 45897, NREL 42160, NREL 45891, NREL 48097, NREL 46526. NREL

free via . www.OSTI.gov. Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758, NREL 29642, NREL 19795. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. . tracker designs of different dimension (e.g. 2up landscape vs - 2-up portrait) since the self-shading geometry and bifacial rear .

Phone: 800.553.6847 or 703.605.6000 Fax: 703.605.6900 Email: orders@ntis.gov Cover Photos by Dennis Schroeder: (left to right) NREL 26173, NREL 18302, NREL 19758, NREL 29642, NREL 19795. NREL prints on paper that contains recycled content. iii

Rapid Flow, Titration, Turbidimetry, Ultraviolet- Visible Spectroscopy (UV/VIS) Parameter/Analyte Water pH EPA 150.1 Turbidity EPA 180.1 Calcium EPA 200.7 Iron EPA 200.7 Magnesium EPA 200.7 Potassium EPA 200.7 Silica, Total EPA 200.7 Sodium EPA 200.7 Aluminum EPA 200.8 Antimony EPA 200.8 Arsenic EPA 200.8 .

EPA Test Method 1: EPA Test Method 2 EPA Test Method 3A. EPA Test Method 4 . Method 3A Oxygen & Carbon Dioxide . EPA Test Method 3A. Method 6C SO. 2. EPA Test Method 6C . Method 7E NOx . EPA Test Method 7E. Method 10 CO . EPA Test Method 10 . Method 25A Hydrocarbons (THC) EPA Test Method 25A. Method 30B Mercury (sorbent trap) EPA Test Method .

Python Programming, 2/e 27 . The University of Western Australia Comparing Algorithms ! To determine how many items are examined in a list of size n, we need to solve for i, or . ! Binary search is an example of a log time algorithm – the amount of time it takes to solve one of these problems grows as the log of the problem size. Python Programming, 2/e 28 n 2i in log 2. The University of .