2013 5 23-RevCrossSections - Tucsonaz.gov

3y ago
28 Views
3 Downloads
3.44 MB
39 Pages
Last View : 15d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : River Barajas
Transcription

Discussion of Updated InitialCross Section ExamplesPhil EricksonCommunity Design ArchitectureMike JohnsonHDR Engineering

Initial Cross Section Concepts Exploring range of potential design solutionsbased on community input to date Five “families” of concepts based on number andfunction of travel lanes Range of types and widths of roadway, roadside,and landscape element “cards” To be used in initial evaluations and next round ofpublic and stakeholder agency review andcomment

Initial Cross Section Concepts Agenda for this item:– Overview of section cards– CTF discussion of section cards– Overview of initial concepts– CTF discussion of other options, issues, etc.

Cross Section Cards Roadway lanes Sidewalk andassociatedlandscaping Medians Local access lane,sidewalk, andlandscaping

Roadway LanesNo changes

Sidewalks & Associated Landscaping

Sidewalks & Associated LandscapingNewCardNewCardNewCard

6‘3‘

8‘12‘

Medians

MediansNewCardNewCardAdd1’Add3’

Local Access Lane

Local Access LaneNewCard

“Families” of Cross Sections Dimension range for Cross Section Families– Four lane92 to 130 feet67 to 134 feet– Four lane plus transit lanes116 to 154 feet89 to 156 feet– Six lane114 to 152 feet89 to 152 feet– Six lane plus transit lanes138 to 172 feet109 to 174 feet

Four LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 92 to 130 feet

Four LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 67 to 134 feet

Four LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 92 to 130 feet

Four LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 67 to 134 feet

Four Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 116 to 154 feet

Four Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 89 to 156 feet

Four Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 116 to 154 feet

Four Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 89 to 156 feet

Six LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 114 to 152 feet

Six LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 89 to 152 feet

Six LanePotential R.O.W. Range – 89 to 152 feetNo Change

Six Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 138 to 172 feet

Six Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 109 to 174 feet

Six Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 138 to 172 feet

Six Lane plus Transit LanesPotential R.O.W. Range – 109 to 174 feet

Local Access Lane StudiesEast of Campbell Concepts

Local Access Lane StudiesEast of Campbell Concepts

Local Access Lane StudiesEast of Campbell Concepts

Local Access Lane StudiesEast of Campbell Concepts

Cross Section StudiesWest of Campbell Concepts

Cross Section StudiesWest of Campbell Concepts

Cross Section StudiesWest of Campbell Concepts

CTF Discussion Are there additional “Families” of design approaches toadd? Are there additional cross section options we shouldillustrate? Are there cross section options we should eliminate? Other issues to discuss?

“Families” of Cross Sections Dimension range for Cross Section Families – Four lane 92 to 130 feet 67 to 134 feet – Four lane plus transit lanes 116 to 154 feet 89 to 156 feet – Six lane 114 to 152 feet 89 to 152 feet – Six lane plus transit lanes 138 to 172 feet .

Related Documents:

Volume 29, Issue 21 Virginia Register of Regulations June 17, 2013 2526 PUBLICATION SCHEDULE AND DEADLINES June 2013 through June 2014 Volume: Issue Material Submitted By Noon* Will Be Published On 29:21 May 29, 2013 June 17, 2013 29:22 June 12, 2013 July 1, 2013 29:23 June 26, 2013 July 15, 2013 29:24 July 10, 2013 July 29, 2013

GENERIC RISK ASSESSMENT INDEX: Risk Assessments Version Issue Date Mobile Scaffold Towers 3 May 2013 Working on Scaffolds 3 May 2013 Excavations 3 May 2013 Working in Confined Spaces 3 May 2013 Working Near Buried Spaces 3 May 2013 Crane Operations 3 May 2013 Maintenance & Repair of Plant 3 May 2013 Welding 3 May 2013 Demolition 3 May 2013 Work Involving Asbestos Products 3 May 2013 Excessive .

US 9,203,881 B2 Page 3 (56) References Cited 2013/0157699 Al * 6/2013 Talwar et al. 455/466 2013/0212497 Al 8/2013 Zelenko et al. U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS 2013/0247216 Al 9/2013 Cinarkaya et al. 2013/0086245 Al * 4/2013 Lu et al. 709/223 2013/0091204 Al * 4/2013 Loh et al. 709/204 * cited by examiner

250-7614 2011-2013 Ford Edge Installation Instructions General Applicability: Ford - 2011-2013 Explorer, 2011-2013 Taurus, 2011-2013 Flex, 2013 Fusion, 2013 F-150/250/350 Lincoln – 2012-2013 MKZ, MKX, MKS, MKT For video installation instructions, please visit us online at www.rostra.com. INSTALLATION PERFORMED ON FORD EDGE FOR REFERENCE ONLY! Parts Identification Page 1 Vehicle Preparation .

Nissan Cube 1.6L 2009-2011 D-512-7 Nissan Cube 1.8L 2009-2013 D-512-7 Nissan Frontier 2.5L 2005-2013 D-512-7 Nissan Frontier 4.0L 2005-2013 D-512-7 Nissan Maxima 3.5L 2005-2013 D-512-7 Nissan Murano 3.5L 2005-2013 D-512-7 Nissan NV2500/NV3500 4.0L 2012-2013 D-512-7 Nissan NV2500/NV3500 5.6L 2012-2013 D-512-7 Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L 2012-2013 D-512-7

NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD NEW 2013 FORD FOCUS FIESTA FUSION F-150 ESCAPE F-150 C-MAX EDGE 17,962 14,962 20,962 29,662 20,962 31,962 24,962 26,962 Stk #1300389 Stk #1300338 Stk #1300123 Stk #1300768 Stk #1300723 Stk #1300531 Stk #1300809 Stk #1300254 SiRiUS Radio .

The Ribbon is featured in all of the programs included in CIS courses; Microsoft Office Access 2013, Excel 2013, PowerPoint 2013, Word 2013, Publisher 2013, and Outlook 2013. Users will notice the similarities in format of the Ribbon across 2013 programs, as well as the tabs unique to specific programs and tasks. Common Tabs Across ProgramsFile Size: 462KB

study of p-rough paths and their collection is done in the second part of the course. Guided by the results on flows of the first part, we shall reinterpret equation (0.4) to construct directly a flow ϕsolution to the equation (0.6) dϕ F X(dt), in a sense to be made precise in the third part of the course. The recipe of construction of ϕwill consist in associating to F and X a C1 .