97p.

2y ago
3 Views
1 Downloads
1.72 MB
98 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Adalynn Cowell
Transcription

DOCUMENT RESUMEED 432 579AUTHORTITLETM 029 644Borrelli, Matthew; Cimochowski, Anna M.CPMSA Comprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and ScienceAchievement, Hartford Public Schools. 1997-1998 Year-EndReport.INSTITUTIONSPONS AGENCYPUB DATENOTEPUB TYPEEDRS PRICEDESCRIPTORSIDENTIFIERSHartford Public Schools, CT.; Curriculum Research andEvaluation, Chaplin, CT.National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA.1999-03-0097p.ReportsEvaluative (142)MF01/PC04 Plus Postage.Elementary Secondary Education; Grants; Low Achievement;*Mathematics Achievement; Mathematics Education;*Partnerships in Education; Program Effectiveness; ProgramEvaluation; School Community Relationship; *Sciences; Tables(Data); Urban Problems; *Urban Schools*Hartford Public Schools CT; *Science AchievementABSTRACTIn October 1996, the Hartford Public Schools (Connecticut)received a grant for a partnership in minority student achievement, but in1998, the grant was not renewed. This is the final year-end report on theHartford Comprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and Science Achievement(CPMSA) covering the program's second year. Fourteen schools were identifiedfor CPMSA activities. The students enrolled in these schools represent 52W ofthe total student population of 22,531 in all the Hartford Public Schools.Multiple data sources were used to evaluate the program's effectiveness.Evaluation of the second year for CPMSA found a different and more effectiveform of implementation than seen in the first year, in part due to theappointment of a full-time program director. The most significant issuesassociated with CPMSA were those that stemmed from ongoing problems in theschool district. The chaos in the public school system made it difficult forprogram activities to unfold as planned. The most significant problem was theremoval of the former superintendent, coupled with the appointment of twointerim superintendents and the eventual hiring of a new permanentsuperintendent. Key partners in the Hartford community expressed strongsupport of the CPMSA initiative and related efforts for systemic reform ofmathematics and science education, but the district was not able to commititself to the program. (Contains 10 figures and 20 tables.) ***********************************Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original ***************************************

CPMSAComprehensive Partnershipsfor Mathematics and Science AchievementHartford Public SchoolsYear-End ReportMarch 1999Matthew BorrelliInterim Superintendent of SchoolsPrincipal InvestigatorAnna M. Cimochowski, Ph.D.Assistant Superintendent for Support Programs and ServicesCo-Principal InvestigatorU.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and ImprovementEDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIALHAS BEEN GRANTED BYThis document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it.0 Minor changes have been made toimprove reproduction quality.Points of view or opinions stated in thisdocument do not necessarily representofficial OERI position or poky.t.).2TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)

Hartford CPMSA. Final Year 1997-98Page iTABLE OF CONTENTS1. INTRODUCTIONA. Demographic Information1. Building Level Activity2. Hartford Public Schools Activity3. Partnerships ActivityB. Goals and ObjectivesC. Relation of Goals and Objectives to Student Outcomes11344672. SYSTEMIC CHANGE DRIVERS10A. Policy10B. District Leadership, Governance, and Management12C. Standards-Based Curriculum19D. Standards-Based Instruction20E. Standards-Based Assessment21F. Professional Development23G. Partnerships, Parental Involvement, and Public Awareness241. Partnerships with Universities, Business, Industry, and Community Groups 242. Parental Involvement253. Public Awareness264. OTHER FACTORSA. School/District ClimateB. Attitudes of Teachers and Other School StaffC. Student AttitudesD. Parent AttitudesE. Student Enrichment Activities2727272727275. SUMMARY296. ATTACHMENTSA. MethodologyB. TISC TablesC. Survey AnalysisD. Survey of CPEP Summer ProgramE. Biographical Sketches313132334558APPENDIXTISC Tables5959Curriadum Research & Evaluatim, 237 Singletai Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.creutonm

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 1CPMSAComprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and Science AchievementHARTFORD PUBLIC SCHOOLS1997-1998 Year-End Report1. INTRODUCTIONIn October 1996, Hartford Public Schools received the Comprehensive Partnerships for theMinority Student Achievement (CPMSA) grant from the National Science Foundation (NSF)for a total of 950,000 over two years, ending in September 1998. There were provisionsfrom NSF for renewal of the grant during subsequent years. In October 1997, officials of theHartford Public Schools retained Curriculum Research & Evaluation (CRE) to serve asexternal evaluator for years one and two of the Hartford CPMSA.In 1998, due to a number of local education issues that jeopardized substantive progresstoward systemic change, NSF chose not to renew the CPMSA grant for Hartford PublicSchools.This is CRE's final year-end report on CPMSA activities in Hartford. The content follows theoutline of questions established by NSF for CPMSA evaluation studies. The reader isencouraged to examine CRE's 1996-97 year-end report and the 1997-98 mid-year report.A. Demographic InformationNumber of students in the school district. Current grand total student enrollment in theHartford Public School System is 22,531 (Hartford Public Schools data for October 1, 1998).Number of students in the school district living below the poverty level. The number ofstudents in the Hartford Public Schools who live below the poverty level (as determined bypercent of students receiving free and reduced-price meals) is 18,318, or 81.3% of the grandtotal student enrollment (Strategic School Profiles, Fall 1997). By contrast, 23.9% of theschool age students statewide live below the poverty levelNumber of students directly involved in CPAISA activities. During the second year of theHartford Comprehensive Partnerships for Mathematics and Science Achievement (CPMSA)grant, there were fourteen schools which the school district identified for CPMSA activities.The current total number of students enrolled in CPMSA targeted schools is 52% of the totalstudent population enrolled in all Hartford Public Schools, which is an increase of more than300% from the number of students enrolled in CPMSA targeted schools during the first year.Curriculum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.creus.com4

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 2The names ofthese schools, their grade levels, and current student enrollments (as of October1, 1998), June 1998 student enrollments, and percent of change are:Grade LevelSchoolEnrollment6/98,% Change10/98iBatchelderPK-65435705% BurnsPK-67316649% -BurrK-86786622% -DwightPK-6575588Annie FisherPK-67617284% -M.D. FoxK-51,0451,0321% -Mary HookerPK-534727920% -KennellyK-88819113% KinsellaPK-65165486% ,NaylorK-8550547.05% -Fox Nfiddle7-89348984% -Quirk Middle7-81,1981,2162% South Middle6-8696700.06% Bulkeley Fligh9-121,2091,39615% 1066410739.07% 46%52%6% -TOTAL STUDENTS IN CPMSA.2% -,% OF TOTAL STUDENTENROLLMENT(Note: underline indicates the four schools that participated during the first year.)Number and type of school district activities sponsored by the NSF's CPMSA program.Hartford Public School's central office personnel established three committees for theCPMSA program.There was a Governing Board that was composed ofHartford Public School's central officepersonnel, including the principal investigator, co-principal investigator, and math, science,and technology chairpersons; representatives from the Connecticut State Department ofEducation, including the Commissioner of Education, Deputy Commissioner of Education,and state math and science consultants; representatives from business and industry; andrepresentatives from the Connecticut Academy for Education in Mathematics, Science, andTechnology (Connecticut's SSI, Project CONNSTRUCT). The Governing Board wasestablished in the first year to provide oversight for the CPMSA grant.Cuniculum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Read, Chaplin. CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.crous.ocanU

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 3Also, there was an Advisory Committee, made up of Hartford Public School's central officepersonnel, chiefly the chairpersons of math, science, and technology, and the fourteen buildingprincipals. The Advisory Committee met periodically during the year to discuss strategies forimplementation and issues associated with the CPMSA grant on both within school buildingand between school building levels.There was also an Academic Council, which consisted of K-12 classroom teachers, whoexpressed an interest in leadership roles for the CPMSA's teacher training program. Thepurpose of the Academic Council was to transfer information to staff and serve as a teachertraining modeLData shows that the Governing Board met on four occasions during the second year.Attendance was spotty, however, representatives from the CSDE, Connecticut Academy, andUTC were always present. The Advisory Committee met on four occasions from September1997 through June 1998. The building principals were asked to attend Advisory Councilmeetings with their staff. Approximately half did so.The Academic Council met regularly during the year for the purpose of advancing the agendafor CPMSA and informing teachers and building principals about the initiative. Topics forcurrent and future meetings that were proposed by the Academic Council included visits tothe Brookhaven National lab, workshops on mini-grant writing, planning for the 1998 summerenrichment program, and dissemination of up-to-date information regarding CPMSA. Theteachers' interest in workshops on writing mini-grants was stimulated by several colleagues,who successfully pursued funds from corporationsincluding Microsoft and GTEtosupport professional development activities in mathematics, science, and technology forteachers and related activities for their students.I. Building Level ActivityThe principal of Henry C. Dwight Elementary School provided an example of building levelactivity sponsored by CPMSA, during year two. Included were student activities, staffactivities, and parents activities.STUDENT ACTIVITIESSeptember 5, 1997Visit to school by NASA astronaut Katherine Coleman togrades 4, 5, and 6. There were 195 students in theassembly.November 12-14, 1997Visit by representatives of NASA on a national tour togrades 4, 5, and 6. Student attendance: 190. There wasgeneral assembly and individual classes.February 10, 1998Dwight School Science Fair during which all 545 K-6students participated.February - March 1998Dwight School After School computer class for 12students.Curriculum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singletrai Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.creus.corn

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98STAFF ACTIVITIESOctober, 1997November/DecemberPage 4Computer workshops on Windows 95 and Office 97 forstaff Attendance: 4-7 teachers.Loctite Software Training for 16 teachers who receivedcomputers .1997PARENTS ACTIVITIESSeptember 20, 1997November 12, 1997February 25, 1998March 11, 1998Parents-Teachers Kickoff event and Fun Fair focused onConnecticut Mastery Test(CMT) skills. Attendance 400parents.Lego Night during which Lego projects were completedby 75 parents for purpose of developing critical thinking.Workshop on CMT test results during which parents tooka practice test. There were 6 parents who participated.Field trip to the Science Museum of Connecticut for 40parents and 70 students.2. HarYbrd Public Schools ActivityIn January 1998, Hartford Public Schools adopted "The Superintendent's Implementation'Plan for Information Technology: 1998-2001," which is designed to enable the district toaccomplish the "1994 Strategy" and the more recent "48 Recommendations for SchoolImprovement." Key areas of the plan include development of skills and competencies,integrated technology, access to integrated technology tools, quality and timely support, andleadership.On February 24 and 25, Hartford Public Schools held its 8th Annual Citywide Mathematics,Science, and Technology Fair at Moylan Elementary SchooLDuring fall 1997 and spring 1998, Hartford Public Schools provided professionaldevelopment courses free to any teachers, certified and non-certified stag and parents of aHartford Public School child. The main purpose of these courses was to raise studentachievement on the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT) and the Connecticut AcademicPerformance Test (CAPT) by improvhig teaching and learning. The staff developmentprogram included courses in mathematics, science, and technology applications for teachingand learning. Technology training courses were held at one of the UTC supportedTechnology Learning Centers, which are located at Moylan, South Middle, and Weaver Highschools.3. Partnerships ActivityThe Mathematics Resource Center, which is operated by Mr. Richard Barton, ExecutiveDirector, provides in-house and off-site tutorial services to students who need assistance withmathematics achievement, particularly at Weaver and Bulkeley high schools. Mr. Bartonconsults regularly with high school principals, mathematics department chairpersons, headguidance personnel, Curriculum and Staff Development Director, and AssistantSuperintendent on methods and strategies for retaining students. One of their conclusions isCurriculum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.crens.com

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 5that students tend to drop out of school when they discover that they have failed a numberof courses. The district has responded to this issue by expanding after school programs on a"for credit" basis, with assistance from the Mathematics Resource Center. Interestingly, thedistrict's decision to charge fees for students who need to make up credit has been receivedin a very positive way by parents in the community.Dr. Timothy Craine, of Central Connecticut State University, presented professionaldevelopment workshops, during fall 1997 and spring 1998, pertaining to teachingmathematics, grades 6-12, for the Hartford Public Schools teachers.Dr. Marilyn Schaffer, ofthe University ofHartford, presented a seminar on leadership duringfal11997. Also, she presented workshops on technology, science, and mathematics for gradesK-12, during spring and summer 1998, for the Hartford Public Schools teachers. The specialemphases of these workshops included the kit-based science plan for elementary schoolteachers and curriculum development to revise and realign the K-12 science and mathcurricula for local, state, and national standards. Documentation indicates that thesetechnology workshops have had maximum enrollments by Hartford teachers.Sr. Claire Markham, Ph.D., of Saint Joseph College, provided a Leadership Science TeacherInstitute during fall 1997 for elementary school teachers in the Hartford Public Schools.Topics included "Adventures in Science;" STC and FOSS science kits; and outreachprograms for children, such as science, mathematics, nutrition, and computer clubs.Connecticut Pre-Engineering Program (CPEP), provided two 1998 summer programsSummer Science Campsfor Hartford students and their teachers who attend CPMSA targetelementary and middle schools. Parents were invited to participate in field trips, PhysicsOlympics, and final awards ceremony. Also, CPEP provided a five-week Summer ScienceCamp at Trinity College during summer 1997 for students entering grades 8h and 9 and whoattend CPMSA schools.Additionally, CPEP provided after school programs to students attending CPMSAelementary, middle, and secondary schools in Hartford. Topics for these classes concernedvarious applications of science, including roller coasters, model bridge construction, androbotics. Students' activities focused on development of skill with computer use,mathematics, science, critical thinking, problem solving, and engineering skills.During fall 1997, CPEP also provided 12 workshops for Hartford Public Schools teachersfrom CPMSA schools. Sites included Central Connecticut State University and University ofHartford. Topics focused on science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. CPEPoffered a similar series ofworkshops during spring 1998 at University of Connecticut HealthCenter, Central Connecticut State University, and Trinity College. Finally, CPEP encouragedK-6 parent involvement at targeted CPMSA schools through offering activities for parentsto support students' achievement on the Connecticut Mastery Test (CMT), science fairactivities, use of community resources for field trips, family math and family science nights,Curriculum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.creuacom

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 6and technology nights for families. These projects were conducted in association with theHartford-based organization, OPMAD, Organized Parents Make A Difference.During fall 1997 and spring 1998, Central Connecticut State University presented its Partnersin Science Program. The program brings together students, teachers, and college faculty forenriching study of biology, chemistry, physics, earth science, and technology. Participantsincluded 11 students ftom Hartford's Quirk Middle SchooL Topics for workshops includedNight Sky, Cells and Math, Building a Motor, Chemistry Magic, Computer-Aided Drafting,Seaweeds, and many others. All courses were taught by CCSU professors from the variousdepartments of mathematics, science, and technology.Partnership activity between CPMSA and United Technologies Corporation led to matchedfunds to support purchase oflaptop computers and e-mail for all vanguard teachers associatedwith the Technology Learning Centers at South Middle School, Moylan Elementary SchooLand Weaver High SchooLB. Goals and ObjectivesGoal of the HarYird CPMSA program. To develop systemic approaches that willsubstantially increase the number of under-represented minority students enrolling in precollege "gatekeeper" science, engineering, and math (SEM) courses.Objectives of the HarYbrd CPMSA program.1. To establish a balanced emphasis on all phases of the K-12 academic pipeline withmajor emphases on math and science enrichment.2. To examine existing school district policies for the purpose of adopting new policiesto facilitate the goal of the CPMSA program and improve the delivery of educationalprograms throughout the district.3. To examine existing budgeting practices for the purpose ofleveraging funding streamsto facilitate significant improvement in delivery ofthe district's educational programs,using NSF funding as the catalyst for systemic change.4. To develop an effective management, - communication, and evaluation plan toimplement systemic change for the purpose of achieving CPMSA goals andobjectives.5. To plan and develop standards-based teacher professional development and studentenrichment interventions in specifically targeted elementary, middle, and high schoolsin respect to "gatekeeper" courses, and to implement strategies with assistance fromNSF that are designed to increase enrollments and successful completion of thesecourses.6. To limit participant support in the CPMSA program for both students and teachersto members of the Hartford Public Schools.7. To maintain a database, starting in 1996-97, of all Level I participants which shall becapable of tracking them throughout their pre-college education. This baseline datashall be used for developing quantitative numerical goals of 10% by the end of the1997-98 school year on specific outcomes pertaining to students' course enrollment,Cunicnlum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-0011 www.creus.com'Jou;.9

Hartford CPMSA. Final Year 1497-98Page 7enrichment activities, and achievement. (Source: Cooperative Agreement, # HRD9625121 )C. Relation of Goals and Objectives to Student OutcomesTabulated Indicators for Systemic Changes (TISC). Recently, Hartford Public Schools hireda new person to assist with data collection and analysis, with specific attention to the TISCreports. Also, district officials reported that successful implementation of CPMSA, andespecially data collection and analysis, requires collaborative work of a large number ofindividuals, who are assembled and given tasks when the demand for data must be met. Theirsubstantial and direct contributions, albeit part-time, were usually not documented.Background information. Hartford Public Schools remain under state receivership. Thecontrolling body is the Board of Trustees, which consists of representatives from differentconstituencies in the Hartford city area, who were appointed by Governor John Rowland in1997 when the takeover occurred.Two local issues influenced the direction and pace of implementing the Hartford CPMSAprogram:district's need to hire another new superintendent of schools (There will be fivedifferent superintendents in six years.) andcompletion of requirements at the city's flagship high school, Hartford Public HighSchool, for accreditation from the New England Association of Schools and Colleges.In May 1998, Hartford Board of Trustees asked the former Superintendent, Dr. PatriciaDaniel, the last permanent superintendent, to resign for a number of reasonsthe mostimportant ofwhich was her failure to provide various school records and other documentationin a timely manner to the Connecticut State Department of Education. Despite changes insuperintendents and the current high school accreditation issue, the district was makingprogress, albeit slow, toward accountability in programming related to CPMSA. In particular,curriculum development on PK-12 levels continued in all content areas, especiallymathematics and science.Subsequent to Dr. Daniel's removal, the district appointed Dr. Benjamin Dixon, formerAssociate Commissioner of Education for the Connecticut State Department of Education(CSDE) to serve as Interim Superintendent. Dr. Dixon was recognized as a solid candidatefor the position of Superintendent of Schools in Hartford, however, prior to his appointmentto the superintendency, he had applied for a university position at Virginia PolytechnicInstitute. Soon after the Board of Trustees appointed him to the Hartford Public Schoolsposition, he was offered and accepted the appointment in Virginia Dr. Dixon planned tocontinue in his duties as Swerintendent until &it 1998.In August1998, the Board of Trustees appointed Matthew Borrelli, former AssistantSuperintendent for West Hartford Public Schools and recently appointed as Hartford PublicSchools' chief of staff in charge of operational audit improvements, as the new interimCumculuni Rowardi & Evaluation, 237 Singletaa Road, Cbaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-00114www.creuaccel

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 8superintendent and Nancy Harris, formerly assistant superintendent for management servicesfor Milford Public Schools, as assistant superintendent for finance and administration.Matthew Borrelli expressed interest only in serving as interim superintendent until the Boardof Trustees hires someone as superintendent of schools, after which he would return to hisposition as chief of staff.In February 1999, the Board of Trustees appointed Anthony Amato, former districtsuperintendent in Manhattan, NY as Superintendent of Hartford Public Schools. AnthonyAmato began work in Hartford immediately on a part-time basis, while completing his dutiesin Manhattan. He will work full time for the district beginning in summer 1999.Despite these issues, a development in the second year of the Hartford CPMSA, whichfollows directly from recommendations of the first year evaluation, is establishment of a neworganization chart. A second change was hiring a new, full time CPMSA Program Director,Ms. Frances Sanchez, a former science teacher for the Hartford Public Schools. The newchain of command gave Ms. Sanchez direct access to the Superintendent of Schools, Dr.Benjamin Dixon, who was Principal Investigator for the Hartford CPMSA. Additionally, Ms.Sanchez had a full time administrative assistant and had transferred management of CPMSAfinancial accounts from the curriculum division for direct control by CPMSA office personneLThese changes in organization, management, and accounting contributed to a more efficientand a more effective second year of activities by the Hartford CPMSA.In Spring 1998, Hartford Public Schools hired Mr. Robert Borello, former elementary schoolprincipal, to serve as Secondary Science Chairperson for the district. This appointment ofMr.Borello satisfied the concern for having a science curriculum chairperson available. Also, Mr.Borello came to the Hartford Public Schools highly recommended by science curriculumspecialists in the state and by representatives of the Connecticut Academy. His knowledgeof science curriculum development in other school districts would be beneficial to Hartford.Also, the Secondary Mathematics Chairperson, Mr. Jimmie Hill, was unavailable for workduring most of winter and spring 1998, due to problems with his health. During Mr. Hill'sabsence, Dr. Anna Cimochowski, Assistant Superintendent for Support Programs andServices, and Mr. Allen Jones, Acting Director of Curriculum/Instruction/Assessment andProfessional Development, administered all regular meetings with high school mathematicsteachers.Ms. Pamela Barker-Jones, whose qualifications include elementary and middle schoolmathematics, in addition to school administration, had responsibility for a range of servicesas chairperson in the areas of elementary mathematics, science, and technology. Additionally,she helped with secondary mathematics in Mr. Hill's absence. However, in fall 1998, Ms.Pamela Barker-Jones resigned from her position with Hartford Public Schools, due to issuesconcerning her job responsibilities.Curriculum Research & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-001 l www.creus.comut11

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 9With partial support from CPMSA, Hartford Public Schools hired Mr. Peter Perreria to serveas technology teacher system-wide.In summer 1998, Frances Sanchez resigned from her position as Director of CPMSA.In conclusion, appointments at the central office level focused on hiring personnel for theareas of CPMSA management, mathematics, science, and technology. However, turnover ofkey personnel contributed significantly to a level ofprogram development that was lower thanrequired to meet the local circumstances and to satisfy NSF's concerns. Additionally, thereare some significant personnel issues at various levels in central office.CUMIC21113331 Resent& & Evaluation, 237 Singleton Road, Chaplin, CT 06235 860-455-1229 Fax 860-455-13011 www.creuazoin

Hartford CPMSA: Final Year 1997-98Page 102. SYSTEMIC CHANGE DRWERSA. PolicyAre district policies in alignment with CPMSA goals? The Hartford Public School Systemestablished policy to ensure that a substantial number of under-represented minority studentsenroll in pre-college science and math courses. As of January 21, 1997, to receive a highschool diploma from the Hartford Public Schools, students enrolled in high school after July1997 with a projected graduation date of 2001 or later must successfully complete threecredits in mathematics and complete the following courses as part of the three creditrequirement: Integrated Math One (equivalent of Algebra One) and Integrated Math Two(equivalent of Geometry). Middle school students enrolled in grade eight after July 1, 1997will be eligible to receive one high school credit for mathematics if all ofthe following criteriaare successfully met: student was enrolled in Integrated Math One by October 1 of the currentschool year; student was in attendance on a regular basis for the current school year; student'saverage in Integrated Math One at the end of the year is 70% or higher; student receivesgrade of 70% or higher on standardized final assessment for Integrated Math One.Also, to receive a high school diploma from Hartford Public Schools, the followingrequirement for science applies: students enrolled in high school after July 1997 with aprojected graduation date of June 2001 or later must successfully complete three credits inscience, and all students must successfully complete one science course with a lab component.These policy changes are consistent with state requirements and include other aspects aboveand beyond the standard Algebra One concepts. The changes for science will be fullyimplemented in the 1998-1999 school year.How do existing district policies impact the success rates of students in these courses? Therecent policy changes for mathematics and science course requirements will raise the bar onacademic success for all students, by establishing a higher level of performance as thestandard. This will serve as an incentive for students to pursue higher achievement levels.However, there is an issue regarding implementation of the requirements. Despite efforts bycentral office administrators to clarify the course requirements, especially for high schoolmathematics teachers, some confusion exists regarding teachers' implementation of theintegrated mathematics curriculum. Some of these teachers have chosen to work in otherprograms, rather than change their courses to reflect the new mathematics standards.The Assistant Superintendent, Dr. Anna Cimochowski, responded to the issue b

the Brookhaven National lab, workshops on mini-grant writing, planning for the 1998 summer . February 10, 1998 Dwight School Science Fair during which all 545 K-6. students participated. February - March 1998. Dwight School After School computer class for 12. students.

Related Documents:

DOCUMENT RESUME. ED 434 981 UD 033 158. TITLE Guide for Implementing the Balanced and Restorative Justice. Model INSTITUTION Department of Justice, Washington, DC. Office of Juvenile. Justice and Delinquency Prevention. REPORT NO NCJ-167887 PUB DATE 1998-12-00 NOTE. 97p. CONTRACT 95-JN-FX-002

BIOGRAFÍA ACADÉMICA DE ALFREDO LÓPEZ AUSTIN Enero de 2020 I. DATOS PERSONALES Nacimiento: Ciudad Juárez, Estado de Chihuahua, México, 12 de marzo de 1936. Nacionalidad: mexicano. Estado civil: casado. Investigador emérito de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, por acuerdo del Consejo Universitario, con fecha 21 de junio de 2000. Sistema Nacional de Investigadores. Nivel III .

It is a three stage model in which each state consists of specific skills that the therapist uses to help the client move forwards. By mastering the process of using these basic skills in an appropriate manner (often in a cyclical process of stage 1 - 2 - 3 evaluate 1 - 2 - 3 evaluate) the talking therapist may be able to increase their efficiency and structure their work in a more logical way .

Mechanical Engineering Aerodynamic Design of Vehicles Compute Aided Analysis & Design Analysis & Design. Mechanical Engineering Wind Energy Fuel Cell Energy. Mechanical Engineering UAV Space Shuttle Air & Space. Mechanical Engineering Robotics Utilities Systems. Civil Engineering Foundation Structural Analysis Analysis & Design. Civil Engineering Bridge Skyscraper Tunnel Construction . Civil .

Buku ini mengulas segala hal tentang herbal, mulai dari apa itu herbal, budidaya dan manfaat serta cara menggunakannya sebagai penyembuh alami. Terdapat TOP 100 Herbal berikut foto berwarna. Panduan wajib bagi anda yang senang berkebun herbal. 258 halaman 6 Guidelines for The Use of Herbal Medicines in Family Health Care Buku terbitan Kementerian Kesehatan RI edisi ke-6 ini, merupakan petunjuk .

6 Part 3 – 5 questions – A man at the zoo gave the animals the wrong food to eat. What did each kind of animal eat today? Listen and write a letter in each box.

Cambridge Primary Checkpoint for Global Perspectives Audio Transcript – Section 2 . Video 1 . In the preparation, or the planning phase of their work, your learners will work in their teams to prepare and plan for the action that they are going to take. With your support and guidance, each group should initially identify more than one local issue that they would like to improve, change or .

compiled from published material. The second and third University of Alberta editions incorporated new or modified methods for spillage and waste disposal developed in my laboratory. The development and testing of procedures for disposal of small waste or surplus quantities of hazardous chemicals in my laboratory is ongoing. Thus, the previous