UNPACKING THE NEW ENGLISH LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY STANDARDS

3y ago
55 Views
2 Downloads
880.04 KB
20 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Bennett Almond
Transcription

FROM THE STANDARDS TO TEACHING AND LEARNING IN THECLASSROOM: A SERIES OF RESOURCES FOR TEACHERSUNPACKING THE NEW ENGLISHLANGUAGE PROFICIENCYSTANDARDSLynn Shafer WillnerWestEdSan Francisco, CaliforniaApril 2014Many of the activities in this document have been adapted with permissionfrom the 2013 CSAI publication “Getting a Handle on the Standards.”Authors:Barbara Jones, Glory Tobiason, Sandy Chang, and Margaret HeritageNational Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), Universityof California, Los Angeles, Graduate School of Education & Information StudiesCopyright 2014 Center on Standards and Assessment ImplementationThe work reported herein was supported by grant number #S283B050022A between the U.S. Department of Education andWestEd with a subcontract to CRESST.The findings and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions orpolicies of WestEd, CRESST, or the U.S. Department of Education.

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsOverviewThis resource is part of a series produced by the Center for Standards and Assessment Implementation to assistteachers and those who support teachers to plan teaching and learning using the new English Language Proficiency(ELP) Standards. In 2013, the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) utilized the services of WestEd and theUnderstanding Language Initiative at Stanford University to develop these new ELP Standards.An important first step in preparing to teach the new ELP Standards well is to understand the content of the ELPStandards and how they differ from States’ prior ELP Standards. This resource provides an introduction to theELP Standards and outlines a detailed process that teachers can use to become knowledgeable about thestandards and prepare to teach them.How to use this resourceThis resource provides an overview of the ELP Standards as well as activities for educators to examine the ELP Standardsin depth. It uses a three‐step process to unpack the new ELP Standards.Step One: Upon which conceptual frameworks and guiding principles are the new ELP Standards based?Step Two: What does each new ELP Standard entail?Step Three: What processes and resources should be in place to implement the new ELP Standards?Step One Activities: Explore Guiding Principles for the new ELP Standards Browse the new ELP Standards documentsStep Two Activities: Interpret the new ELP Standards Classify the Depth of Knowledge associated with the language demands of certain new ELP Standards Explore the language demands of ELA, Mathematics, and Science tasks Summarize the language demands of among content area practices Consider broader modes of communication to support students’ abilities to receive, interact, and producelanguage during instructional activities Examine the vertical progressions of the new ELP Standards Compare current and new ELP StandardsStep Three Activities: Determine the degree to which specific ELP Standards are currently being instructed Determine how lessons might be integrated into units Determine next steps and resources needed for ELP Standards implementationThe information and materials provided in this resource are intended to help educators at all levels betterunderstand the new ELP Standards. Educators can choose to work through all sections of this resource individuallyor as a group (recommended) or to use and/or adapt specific sections to tailor this resource to their needs. Inaddition to the text placed in this document, please refer to the resources posted t does each new ELP Standard entail?2

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsExplore the Guiding Principles for the new ELP StandardsDirections: Work with a partner or, using the jigsaw method, count off by 8’s and sit with those with the same number.Together, read the Guiding Principles around which the ELP Standards have been designed. With your partner or group, developa list of what each guiding principle does not state, its antithesis. Return to base group to share results. Keep track of questionsthat arise.Guiding PrinciplesAntithesis of Each Guiding Principle1. PotentialELLs have the same potential as native speakers of English toengage in cognitively complex tasks. Regardless of ELP level, allELLs need access to challenging, grade‐appropriate1 curriculum,instruction, and assessment and benefit from activities requiringthem to create linguistic output (Ellis, 2008a; 2008b). Even thoughELLs will produce language that includes features that distinguishthem from their native‐English‐speaking peers, “it is possible [forELLs] to achieve the standards for college‐and‐career readiness”(NGA Center & CCSSO, 2010b, p. 1).2. Funds of KnowledgeELLs’ primary languages and other social, cultural, and linguisticbackground knowledge and resources (i.e., their “funds ofknowledge” [Moll, Amanti, Neff, & González, 1992]) are usefultools to help them navigate back and forth among their schoolsand their communities’ valuable resources as they develop thesocial, cultural, and linguistic competencies required for effectivecommunication in English. In particular, an awareness of cultureshould be embedded within curriculum, instruction, andassessment provided to ELLs since “the more one knows about theother language and culture, the greater the chances of creating theappropriate cultural interpretation of a written or spoken text”(National Standards in Foreign Language Education Project, 2006,p. 37).3. Diversity in ELL Progress in Acquiring English LanguageProficiencyA student’s ability to demonstrate proficiency at a particularELP level will depend on context, content‐area focus, anddevelopmental factors. Thus, a student’s designated ELP levelrepresents a typical current performance level, not a fixed status.An English language proficiency level does not identify a student(e.g., “Level 1 student”), but rather identifies what a student knowsand can do at a particular stage of English language development,for example, “a student at Level 1” or “a student whose listeningperformance is at Level 1.” Progress in acquiring English may varydepending upon program type, age at which entered program,initial English proficiency level, native language literacy, and otherfactors (Bailey & Heritage, 2010; Byrnes & Canale, 1987; Lowe &Stansfield, 1988). Within these ELP Standards, we assume paralleldevelopment of language and content‐area knowledge, skills, andabilities. ELLs do not need to wait until their ELP is sufficiently1Grade appropriate is defined by the English language arts, mathematics, and science standards for that grade.3

Unpacking the New ELP Standardsdeveloped to participate in content area instruction andassessment. “Research has shown that ELLs can develop literacy inEnglish even as their oral proficiency in English develops (Bunch,Kibler, & Pimentel, 2013, p. 15).4.ScaffoldingELLs at all levels of ELP should be provided with scaffolding inorder to reach the next reasonable proficiency level as theydevelop grade‐appropriate language capacities, particularlythose that involve content‐specific vocabulary and registers.The type and intensity of the scaffolding provided will dependon each student’s ability to undertake the particular taskindependently while continuing to uphold appropriatecomplexity for the student.5.Students with Limited or Interrupted Formal EducationELLs with limited or interrupted formal education must beprovided access to targeted supports that allow them to developfoundational literacy skills in an accelerated time frame(DeCapua & Marshall, 2011). Educators can refer to the CommonCore State Standards (CCSS) for ELA section “Reading:Foundational Skills” (NGA Center & CCSSO, 2010) for thispurpose.6.Special NeedsELLs with disabilities can benefit from English languagedevelopment services (and are required to have languagedevelopment goals as part of their Individualized EducationPlans [IEPs]). Educators should be aware that these studentsmay take slightly different paths toward English languageproficiency.7.Access Supports and AccommodationsBased on their individual needs, all ELLs, including ELLs withdisabilities, should be provided access supports andaccommodations for assessments, so that their assessmentresults are valid and reflect what they know and can do.Educators should be aware that these access supports andaccommodations can be used in classroom instruction andassessment to ensure that students have access to instructionand assessment based on the ELP Standards. When identifyingthe access supports and accommodations that should beconsidered for ELLs and ELLs with IEPs or 504 plans duringclassroom instruction and assessment, it is particularly useful toconsider ELL needs in relation to receptive and productivemodalities.8. Multimedia, Technology, and New LiteraciesNew understandings around literacy (e.g., visual and digitalliteracies) have emerged around use of information andcommunication technologies (International ReadingAssociation, 2009). Relevant, strategic, and appropriatemultimedia tools and technology, aligned to the ELP Standards,should be integrated into the design of curriculum, instruction,and assessment for ELLs.4

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsWhat elements of the Guiding Principle you discussed are you able to implement inyour current practice? Where do you encounter challenges?Additional questions raised during your discussion:5

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsBrowse the new ELP StandardsTour the new ELP Standards. What are your observations? With a partner or a group, organize your observations usingthe following categories:Facts, DetailsReactions, FeelingsQuestionsNew Ideas, ConnectionsWhat is most important here?Frame group discussion of this organizer as a K‐W‐L: (a) This is what we know about the ELP Standards; (b) this is what wewant to learn; and (c) later, return and discuss: This is what we found out.6

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsInterpret the New ELP StandardsEach of the 10 standard statements outlines a goal for the English language proficiency which ELLs will need todevelop to participate independently in grade‐appropriate classroom activities. Use a pencil to write the gist of each statement in your own words.Analyze the new ELP Standards to identify which ones address listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Place a checkmark next to the domains from the list in the column to the right. Try to reach consensus on the domains addressed ineach. Take turns sharing your interpretations of the standards with the whole group. Provide feedback to one another and make changes to your summary as needed, until you are confident youunderstand the main points of your standard, including how it is distinct from the other ELP Standards. We will revisit these summaries as we complete the next few activities.#ELP Standard StatementsDomains Addressed?1construct meaning from oral presentations and literary and informational text through grade‐appropriatelistening, reading, and akingReadingWriting2participate in grade‐appropriate oral and written exchanges of information, ideas, and analyses, responding topeer, audience, or reader comments and questions3speak and write about grade‐appropriate complex literary and informational texts and topicsListeningSpeakingReadingWriting4construct grade‐appropriate oral and written claims and support them with reasoning and evidenceListeningSpeakingReadingWriting5conduct research and evaluate and communicate findings to answer questions or solve problems6analyze and critique the arguments of others orally and in writing7adapt language choices to purpose, task, and audience when speaking and 8determine the meaning of words and phrases in oral presentations and literary andinformational text9create clear and coherent grade‐appropriate speech and text10make accurate use of standard English to communicate in grade‐appropriate speech and 7

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsClassify the Depth of Knowledge associated with the Language Demands of CertainELP StandardsDirections: Examine the ELP Standards below. What is the depth of knowledge (DOK) associated with the language demandsdescribed in each standard? Place the number for each standard next to the appropriate DOK section(s) in the chart. Be prepared to explain your thinking. What generalizations or conclusions can you now make? Follow‐up: Are there any ways in which your ELP Standard summaries on p. 7 can be adjusted?Standard 3: speak and write about grade‐appropriate complex literary and informational texts and topicsStandard 4: construct grade‐appropriate oral and written claims and support them with reasoning andevidenceStandard 5: conduct research and evaluate and communicate findings to answer questions or solve problemsStandard 6: analyze and critique the arguments of others orally and in writingQuestions to consider:If you use the Depth of Knowledge wheel to understand more about the depth of your student'sunderstanding, what does the student’s language use reveal about his or her access to content?8

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsExplore the Language Demands of ELA, Mathematics, and Science TasksTo ensure the ELP standards specify the language that all ELLs must acquire in order to successfully engage with college‐and‐career‐ready standards in ELA & Literacy, mathematics, and science, the new ELP Standards employ two methodsof correspondence mappings:Example of New ELP Standards with CorrespondencesEach ELP Standard contains a standardstatement and 5 ELP levelsFirst Set of Correspondences: Each ELPStandard contains correspondences withStandards for Practice: English Practices(EPs), Mathematical Practices (MPs), andScience Practices (SPs)Second Set of Correspondences:Each ELP Standard containscorrespondences with CCSS for ELAcontent standardsCCSS for ELA & Literacy The K–5 standards focus on reading, writing, speaking, listening, and language across the curriculum, reflectingthe fact that most or all of the instruction students in these grades receive comes from one teacher The grades 6–12 standards are covered in two content area–specific sections, the first for English language artsteachers and the second for teachers of history/social studies, science, and technical subjects.What are the practices?The term practices refers to behaviors which developing student practitioners should increasingly use when engagingwith the content and growing in content‐area maturity and expertise throughout their elementary, middle, and highschool years. The CCSS Standards for Mathematical Practices a.k.a., the Mathematical Practices are the first eight standards for the CCSSfor MathematicsThe NGSS Science and Engineering Practices are one of three dimensions in every NGSS standard.A set of ELA “Practices” was created for the CCSSO ELPD Framework since the CCSS for ELA & Literacy did not includespecific practices in their original form.The ELP Standards address the types of language proficiency that ELLs need as they engage in content‐area practices(and, therefore, may show slightly different groupings of practices with each ELP Standard than the groupings shown inFigure 1). “By explicitly calling attention to these practices, state ELP Standards [can be designed to] cultivate higherorder thinking skills in ELLs and target their ability to comprehend and communicate about complex text” (CCSSO, 2012,p. 16).9

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsSummarize the Language Demands among the Content Area PracticesCreate a summary for the converging practices shown in each of the section in the diagram below.Summaries for the Diagram SectionsI.EP2, EP5, MP3, EP4, SP7:II.SP2, MP4, SP5:III.SP8, EP2:IV.EP7, MP5:V.MP1, MP2, MP6, MP7, MP8:VI.SP1, SP3, SP4, SP6:VII.EP4, EP5, EP6:10

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsK‐12 Practices MatrixUse the K‐12 Practices Matrix to identify a practice and its corresponding ELP Standard. In the ELP Standards documents, you canclick on the ELP Standard number to go to the standard.The purpose of the K‐12 Practices Matrix [and also the ELA Standards Matrix for each Grade Level] is to help teachers designlesson plans which leverage the strongest correspondences between the ELP Standards and the CCSS and NGSS. However,depending on the instructional activity, and as educators’ familiarity with the standards is built, educators may identify othercorrespondences that also make sense. The matrices are intended to help educators start with correspondence analyses—they arenot an endpoint. The matrices do not contain a fixed set of correspondences.PracticesELA “Practices”2 (EP)123EP1EP1EP1ELP Standards45678910EP2EP2EP1. Support analyses of a range of grade-levelcomplex texts with evidence.EP1EP1EP2. Produce clear and coherent writing in which theEP3.EP4.EP5.EP6.development, organization, and style areappropriate to task, purpose, and audience.Construct valid arguments from evidence andcritique the reasoning of others.Build and present knowledge through research byintegrating, comparing, and synthesizing ideasfrom texts.Build upon the ideas of others and articulate his orher own when working collaboratively.Use English structures to communicate contextspecific messages.Mathematical Practices P5EP5EP5EP6EP6456MP1MP1EP2EP6EP6EP6789MP1MP110MP1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solvingthem.MP2. Reason abstractly and quantitatively.MP3. Construct viable arguments and critique theMP4.MP5.MP6.MP7.MP8.Science Practices (SP)SP1.SP2.SP3.SP4.SP5.SP6.SP7.SP8.MP3reasoning of others.Model with mathematics.Use appropriate tools strategically.Attend to precision.Look for and make use of structure.Look for and express regularity in repeatedreasoning.Ask questions and define problems.Develop and use models.Plan and carry out investigations.Analyze and interpret data.Use mathematics and computational thinking.Construct explanations and design solutions.Engage in argument from evidence.Obtain, evaluate, and communicate 6SP7SP8SP8SP8SP82While the CCSS for mathematics and the NGSS explicitly state key practices and core ideas for their respective discipline, thecorresponding features in the ELA charts were identified through a close analysis of the priorities contained within the standardsthemselves (because the CCSS for ELA do not explicitly identify key practices and core ideas) (CCSSO, 2012, p. 16).11

Unpacking the New ELP StandardsConsider Broader Modes of Communication to Support Students’ Abilities to Receive,Interact, and Produce Language during Instructional ActivitiesGuiding Principle 1 focus on Potential. It states:ELLs have the same potential as native speakers of English to engage in cognitively complex tasks. Regardless of ELP level,all ELLs need access to challenging, grade‐appropriate3 curriculum, instruction, and assessment and benefit from activitiesrequiring them to create linguistic output (Ellis, 2008a; 2008b). Even though ELLs will produce language that includes featuresthat distinguish them from their native‐English‐speaking peers, “it is possible [for ELLs] to achieve the standards for college‐and‐career readiness” (NGA Center & CCSSO, 2010b, p. 1).As you examine and explore different model lessons and tools showing effective practices for instructing ELLs, discusswith your colleagues which broader communication approaches, strategies, or tools which might support studentparticipation in activities designed around these ELP Standards.41construct meaning from oral presentations and literaryand inf

Unpacking the New ELP Standards 3 Explore the Guiding Principles for the new ELP Standards Directions: Work with a partner or, using the jigsaw method, count off by 8’s and sit with those with the same number. Together, read the Guiding Principles around which the ELP Standards have been designed.

Related Documents:

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

MARCH 1973/FIFTY CENTS o 1 u ar CC,, tonics INCLUDING Electronics World UNDERSTANDING NEW FM TUNER SPECS CRYSTALS FOR CB BUILD: 1;: .Á Low Cóst Digital Clock ','Thé Light.Probé *Stage Lighting for thé Amateur s. Po ROCK\ MUSIC AND NOISE POLLUTION HOW WE HEAR THE WAY WE DO TEST REPORTS: - Dynacó FM -51 . ti Whárfedale W60E Speaker System' .

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.