Sonoma Developmental Center: Site Transformation Study

1y ago
9 Views
2 Downloads
1.84 MB
74 Pages
Last View : 19d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Cade Thielen
Transcription

SonomaDevelopmentalCenter: SiteTransformationStudyPrepared for Transform SDC

Table of ContentsEXECUTIVE SUMMARY1INTRODUCTION: A VISION TO TR ANSFORM SDCMETHODOLOGY58SERVE THE PEOPLE, PROTECT THE L AND,10CREATE A VISIONARY INSTITUTIONCore Pillar: Preserve SDC’s Open Space10Core Pillar: Transform Health & Human ServicesCore Pillar: Create a Visionary Institution15MODELS FOR A TR ANSFORMED SDCKey Findings141717Governance & Land Transfer20PATHWAYS TO TR ANSFORM SDCScenario 1: University Acquisition2424Scenario 2: Trust or Wholly Owned Government Corporation25Scenario 3: Private Redevelopment with Multiple Compatible UsesRECOMMENDATIONS28Create a New Trust to Transform SDCProvide Transitional LeadershipSuggested Priorities2930Immediate Next StepsAPPENDICES283031A: Acknowledgments31B: Guiding Principles32C: Site Transformations Summary TableD: Transformation Case StudiesE: New Models of Care3862F: References and Documents Consulted2336926

Executive SummaryIn May 2015, Governor Jerry Brown submitted a budget proposal calling for the closureof California’s remaining developmental centers. These centers are among an array of large,publicly funded institutions undergoing dramatic change across the country. Military bases,state-run hospitals, and other aging facilities arebeing reimagined for new or renewed purposesin every state. Cooperative management agreements across agencies and sectors are helping to pool resources toward common goals.Innovative financial partnerships are helpingstrengthen the resilience of these institutions.A visionary transformation at the SonomaDevelopmental Center (SDC) property couldinform future closures seeking to integrate community values, sustainability, and economic viability to achieve a higher purpose. What happensnext at SDC could serve as a national model forother institutions facing a similar uncertain future.Site Management Study:Process AnalysisPotrero Group was invited to study transformation stories of other large institutions and to identify key principles and lessons learned that couldinform the process at SDC. The purpose of thisstudy is to examine existing partnership modelsand frameworks that can support a collaborativetransformation process, as well as strategies toensure that future site uses are financially selfsustaining. The models examined representthemes identified by community stakeholders,including centers for sustainability, health andhuman services, historic preservation, naturalresource protection, and higher education. Thisstudy is, by necessity, preliminary and intendedto inform a much more comprehensive process.Key FindingsTH E PL AN N I N G PR O CESSEN G AG ES TH E CO MMUN I TYAN D I N CL UD ES CR I TI CALSTAKEH O L D ER SAll of the successful site transformations thatwere examined for this study engaged in planning processes that were inclusive, collaborative,and comprehensive. At the time, these planningprocesses proved to be quite challenging, but inthe long run the results were extraordinary.TH E PR O CESS I N CL UD ESSI G N I FI CAN T H I G H - L EVEL STATE,CO R PO R ATE, AN D / O R N ATI O N ALL EAD ER SH I PIn addition to community planning organizations orboards, adding individuals of state-level or nationalstature can ensure that the site reaches its maximum potential and transcends some of the limitations associated with local and regional politics.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY1

F INA NCIAL SELF-SUFFICIEN CY I SAT T HE CO R E OF PLANNIN GPlanning processes are often at risk of becoming a “wish list” of community desires and hopesfor a site, which ultimately results in a haltedprocess or a default to the status quo becausethese hopes fail to cohere into a feasible vision.Some of the most successful transformationsundertook detailed economic analyses early inthe process, including rigorous market analysisof potential revenue streams that can supportsite operations, staff, and programs. These models balanced the hopes and desires for the sitewith a solid focus on ensuring that financial sustainability was an integral part of the planningprocess. Realistic cost projections helped to setreasonable expectations for the site and ensuredthe stability of tenants and anchor institutions.A P OWER FUL VISION FORTRA NSFO R MATIO N ATTRACTSF INA NCIAL AND VO LUNTE ERRES OUR CESA powerful, coherent vision can help elevatethe goals of the project above niche interests.Funders, progressive developers, and communityvolunteers are often attracted to sites that havea compelling vision. This compelling vision canhelp bring significant resources to the projectand help it avoid potentially divisive local politics. Sites of significant acreage without a central,coherent vision are often parceled off to various,unrelated users. At best, this new developmentmisses an opportunity to create something thatis greater than the sum of its parts. At worst, adivided strategy can result in lengthy negotiations over boundaries and resources, slowing orsometimes halting a project entirely.ALTER N ATI V E G O V ER N AN CESTR UCTUR ES EN AB L E TH E SI TETO TR AN SCEN D L I MI TATI O N S OFTR AD I TI O N AL D EVEL O PMEN TAN D / O R G O V ER N MEN TO W N ER SH I PTrusts, government-owned corporations, public-private partnerships, and hybrid structuresprovide remarkable flexibility that isn’t usuallyavailable if the project utilizes traditional businessor governmental structures. Some of the mostsuccessful models carefully examined the legalauthorities and relationships they needed to create the impact they desired and found the bestgovernance structure that fostered this impact.Pathways toTransform SDCThe following scenarios describe the three mostfeasible paths forward for the SDC transformation. Each provides a distinct pathway for landtransfer, site governance, and redevelopment.Input from stakeholders and focus on a preferred scenario will lay the foundation for a morecomprehensive feasibility study in the future.2SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY

S C ENA RIO 1:U NIVERSITY ACQ UISITIONA direct transfer of the SDC campus to a Californiapublic institution of higher education is amongthe least complicated options for transformingSDC. The existing governing structure of theacquiring institution will assume responsibilityfor the transformation, utilizing budgeted fundsfor expansion to adapt the campus. This scenariocould be a promising path to maintain the property as an innovative healthcare-centered campus. However, university acquisitions are oftenopportunistic, driven by the university’s currentplans for expansion and departmental needs.S C ENA RIO 2:T RU S T OR WH O LLY O WNED G O VERNMENT CO R PORATIO NPublic-private partnerships are able to transcendthe limitations of private redevelopments andinter-governmental transfers to achieve a modelthat is unique. This balanced approach helps tominimize the site’s fiscal liability while maximizing the community benefit potential. The primary consideration for such an institution shouldinclude a strong business plan for financial selfsufficiency. Balancing the aspirations of the newinstitution with financial sustainability across thesite as a whole will be key to success. Partnershipnegotiations and structural agreements are generally the most complex aspect of this model,more so than permitting, zoning, or even fundraising. Visionary leaders and individuals withstrong communication skills are needed to communicate the new model as it develops.S C ENA RIO 3:PRIVAT E R ED EVELOPMENT W I THMU LTIPL E CO MPATIBLE USESThis is another common pathway for institutionalsite conversions, particularly military bases.Parcels are sold to various entities and developers that create diverse site uses. As in most anydevelopment, the process is subject to extensivepublic input, ensuring that key community concerns are addressed. After the development,governance is divided among each of the various landholders. Without a central institutionsolely dedicated to guiding the transition, thesite could lack a coherent unified transformation enabled by other models. Aspects of theredevelopment can be slow to complete, inpart because each aspect of the plan is subjectto competing political interests and communitydesires. Lease revenue or profit-sharing models are unlikely to sustain innovative site uses—these will need their own model for financialself-sufficiency.Recommendations &Next StepsGiven the diverse set of opportunities for reuseat the SDC site, as well as interest in a variety ofprogramming options on the site’s ample campus, Potrero Group recommends that stakeholders pursue Scenario 2, utilizing a trust of diverseleaders to govern the transformation throughpublic-private partnership with the State ofCalifornia. This partnership can support andcoordinate a few key anchor institutions—incorporating elements from Scenarios 1 & 3 suchas a satellite campus, health service institution,and other complementary uses—while steering transformation efforts in accordance withcore values with a site-wide plan for financialsustainability.Goals to protect the land as well as serve thecommunity at SDC are complementary. However,a central body that can execute a vision forboth of these elements is a missing componentfrom the SDC effort. The community’s vision fora transformed SDC contains some elementsthat require collaboration with the CaliforniaDepartment of Developmental Services (DDS)SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY3

SUGGESTED PRIORITIES1Establish a governing trust that guides a focusedfeasibility assessment of the site2Collaborate with DDS, DGS, State Legislature, and otherrelevant state agencies on the closure plan and transformation3Conduct a detailed inventory and site assessments4Develop a Master Plan for the SDC site as a whole5Create a cooperating agreement with theState of California to execute the Master Planas well as others that are beyond this agency’sscope. Therefore, a more collaborative approachis needed. A body dedicated to a compellingvision for transformation, with the authority tomake decisions on the property in partnershipwith the State of California, is a natural next step.4I MMED I ATE N EXT STEPS–Establish a plan to permanently protect theopen space and natural resources on thesite.–Confirm a preferred scenario concept andsite reuse vision for the SDC campus.–Establish a working board to govern thetransformation effort.–Conduct a feasibility study of the preferredmodel, including a detailed financial analysis,operational considerations, and site transformation details.–Confirm anchor institutions for the site thatare consistent with guiding principles.–Pursue a cooperating agreement with theState of California to develop a Master Plan.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY

Introduction: A Visionto Transform SDCFew residents of the Sonoma Valley areunaffected by the changes facing theSonoma Developmental Center (SDC). TheDevelopmental Center has been a significantemployer in Sonoma County for over a centuryand is widely utilized by the community for recreation and enjoyment. The residents at SDCare a vulnerable population, with some of thegreatest physical and behavioral health needs inthe state. Its tranquil setting and highly trainedstaff provide peace of mind for hundreds of family members and guardians who care deeplyabout its residents. SDC is also the site of thevalley’s most critical wildlife corridor, a threequarter-mile-wide habitat linkage between theMayacamas Mountains and Sonoma Mountainin the Marin Ridge.In May 2015, Governor Jerry Brown submitteda budget proposal calling for the closure ofCalifornia’s remaining developmental centers.Broadly, the aim of these closures is to complyboth with California’s Lanterman Act and withthe federal Centers for Medicare & MedicaidServices (CMS) regulatory standards for reimbursement of health care costs. Both of theselegal systems require California to transitionindividuals from institutional settings to homeand community-based settings. Members of theSonoma Valley community recognize and support the civil rights values underpinning thesemandates. While the most straightforward solution may be to disperse residents, staff, andservices beyond the boundaries of the currentdevelopmental center and into other communities throughout northern California, local stakeholders believe there may be another path thathas not been explored.Many see great opportunity in the future of SDC.Even with health services for vulnerable populations and open space portions of the propertypreserved, the currently underutilized, approximately 200-acre campus could become a centerfor institutions that bring cultural, educational,and economic value to the region. All of thesecomponents contribute to make SDC a unique,though complicated, opportunity.Developmental centers are among an array oflarge, aging, publicly funded institutions undergoing dramatic change across the country.Military bases, state-run hospitals, and otheroutdated facilities are being reimagined for newor renewed purposes in every state. Cooperativemanagement agreements across agencies andsectors are helping to pool resources towardcommon goals. Innovative financial partnershipsare helping strengthen the resilience of theseinstitutions. Success on the SDC property couldinform future closures with a shared vision tointegrate community values, sustainability, andeconomic viability to achieve a higher purpose.A closure process that excludes the possibility of concurrently planning for SDC’s futureSONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY5

eliminates many creative solutions to transformthe site rather than reinvent it from scratch onlyafter the closure is complete. This path for theSDC transformation also presents a new, unexplored model for continued care at SDC: ratherthan disperse the most vulnerable individualsinto communities lacking in quality staff andresources, invite the community onto the property and build support and balance around somestructures and services that already exist. Whathappens next at SDC could serve as a nationalmodel for other institutions facing the sameuncertain future.Rather than fracture along divided interests, theSonoma Valley community has come together instrong support of a shared vision for SDC. Highlevels of public engagement, local leadership,and philanthropic support behind the community’s planning efforts are perhaps the site’sbiggest strengths. All of the necessary ingredients are present to seize a historic opportunity,including political will, community engagement,thoughtful leadership, and generous supporters.Beginning in 2012, a diverse local partnershipcomprised of the County of Sonoma, the ParentHospital Association, the Sonoma Land Trust, theSonoma Ecology Center, and other community6groups gathered to organize and discuss theirconcerns over the future of SDC. This partnership became known as the SDC Coalition andmet regularly to discuss the future of the site.The SDC Coalition’s comprehensive and inclusive planning process has engaged hundredsof local residents with a focus on preservingthe unique health care services, economic vitality, and natural resources provided by the site.The unexpected swift pace of the state’s closuretimeline is forcing critical decisions around thisprocess. Rather than jeopardize a communitysupported vision, the SDC Coalition seeks activecollaboration with the California Department ofDevelopmental Services (DDS), California StateLegislature, Department of General Services(DGS), and other relevant state agencies tothoughtfully plan for the future in order to realize the full potential at SDC.Study PurposeThe SDC Coalition aims to bring local capacityto the complicated undertaking of both closingthe developmental center as a solely state-operated institution and redeveloping the site, andhas hired a variety of experts and consultants.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY

The purpose of this site transformation studyis to examine existing partnership models thatprovide key insights for a transformation efforton the SDC property. These models includeframeworks to support a collaborative transformation process, as well as strategies to ensurethat future site uses are financially self-sustainingwhile remaining true to core community values.Although there are many innovative models forsite reuse to choose from, public input has helpedprovide an initial focus for this study. A community workshop in May of 2015 resulted in strongguiding principles for the desired transformationof SDC, including the following vision statement:Create a public-private partnership drivenby community ideas and values thatshowcases the site’s history, maintainscritical services for the developmentallydisabled, provides opportunities for creative reuse of SDC’s assets, and preservesthe natural resources and open space ofthe site.Stakeholders have also stressed the importanceof creating a financially and environmentally sustainable site that remains in harmony with thesurrounding community. A compelling visionfor SDC that embraces these principles is wellwithin reach.The recommended scenarios described in thisreport are intended to create a common language for discussing models for SDC’s future,envisioning a planning process, and navigatinga path forward. This study describes potentialstructures to support the SDC vision with soundgovernance and the ability to develop a planfor financial sustainability. Due to the time constraints of the closure process, this initial studyis preliminary. Additional research on potentialmodels and approaches will be necessary onceSonoma community stakeholders, DDS, theCalifornia State Legislature, DGS, and other relevant state agencies provide feedback on thispreliminary study.Potrero Group is a business-planning firm withdeep expertise in public-private partnerships.Our team has extensive experience working withorganizations like the National Park Service andthe National Park Foundation, complex partnerships on public lands such as The Presidio Trust(San Francisco) and CityArchRiver (St. Louis),and unique mission-driven startups like MarinClean Energy and The Institute at the GoldenGate. We bring an externally focused approachto new endeavors in the public sector throughmarket research, and the use of business planning tools that tie mission-driven strategies tofinancial sustainability.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY7

MethodologySite Transformation StudyTwo approaches were taken to conduct this study:1. PROCESS ANALYSIS. Insights and trendscompiled from 21 diverse transformationmodels to help inform partnerships, process,and end-use vision at the SDC site. Thesemodels are summarized by partnership type.2. TRANSFORMATION CASE STUDIES.Narratives describing 10 site-transformationmodels that utilized multi-governmental orpublic-private partnerships.Potrero Group was invited to review and analyzetransformation stories of comparable sites and toidentify key principles and lessons learned thatcould inform the process at SDC. The modelsexamined represent themes identified by the community, including centers for sustainability, healthand human services, historic preservation, andhigher education. Review and analysis of thesemodels provide a sense of the time, resources,and leadership structures required for such anundertaking. Additionally, these stories illuminatethe incredible potential of such processes.cases, selecting the right partnership modelwas informed by a clear vision for reuse and theopportunistic application of available resources.In some cases, programmatic end-uses of theproperty were not entirely known when partnersbegan their planning process. However, it wasoften the case that a diverse set of stakeholders used guiding principles to develop management plans that brought forth a more concretevision, thereby meeting diverse interests andgoals to create broad community benefit.StakeholderEngagementThis study was informed by input and collaboration with the SDC Coalition and communitystakeholders. Potrero Group attended meetingsMany of the models studied created publicprivate partnerships to realize their uniquevisions. Others utilized university transfers, private developments, and other multi-governmental partnerships as tools for change. In most8SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY

with the Coalition, the County of Sonoma, andDDS, in addition to holding separate interviewswith local stakeholders to elicit specific opportunities and barriers to meeting the community’sarticulated goals. A complete list of contributors and interviews can be found in Appendix A.This study is also informed by guiding principlesthat were generated in May of 2015 by over 200Sonoma Valley residents and members of theSDC Coalition during a workshop led by theCenter for Collaborative Policy (Appendix B).Report ContentsThis report is presented in four sections. Eachsection builds a case for the next in an effort tosimplify the complexities surrounding the site’sclosure and potential transformation.1. SERVE THE PEOPLE, PROTECT THE LAND,CREATE A VISIONARY INSTITUTIONThis section provides the context for thepartnership model desired at SDC, describing the site values that the community seeksto preserve in the transformation effort.2. MODELS FOR A TRANSFORMED SDCThis section illuminates key lessons from othertransformations around the country, providingconcrete frameworks to help reimagine SDC.3. PATHWAYS TO TRANSFORM SDCPotrero Group describes three scenarios fortransforming SDC that provide distinct pathways for land transfer, site programming, andredevelopment.4. RECOMMENDATIONSPotrero Group recommends a path forwardfor decision-making at SDC, including suggested next steps to initiate a public-privatepartnership model.The findings of this site management study arepreliminary. A deeper analysis of financial models that support the transformation vision will bean appropriate next step once a clearer sense ofthe site’s ultimate use and governing structure isestablished.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY9

Serve the People,Protect the Land, Createa Visionary InstitutionCore Pillars of theTransformation at SDCSDC is located within the Sonoma Valley, immediately south of the historic town of Glen Ellen.The property comprises approximately 900acres, which includes the main developmentalcenter campus of nearly 200 acres and over 700acres of open space. For more than a century,SDC has provided services to the community andthe region. While its primary mission is the careof the developmentally disabled, the campusprovides many other benefits, including employment, recreation, environmental services, andcultural and historic value.The community’s vision for future activities onthe SDC’s campus rests on three core pillars:–Preserve SDC’s open space, valuable naturalresources, and scenic values to support thewildlife corridor habitat and provide enjoyment for future generations.–Maintain critical health care and residentialservices for special needs patients in orderto sustain the greater autonomy and safetyof this vulnerable community as well as provide a statewide hub for specialized services.–Promote site uses that diversify and enhancethe valley’s economy and establish a model10for self-sufficiency; these uses would aim topreserve the distinctive rural character of thevalley as well as the historical and architectural integrity of SDC.These principles have made SDC unique for over100 years and continue to be of high value tothe people who live in the Sonoma Valley. Beforeexamining other complementary uses at the site,it is important to understand the core pillars ofthe community’s vision and why they must becarefully considered in planning for SDC’s future.CO R E PI L L AR :Preserve SDC’s OpenSpaceWith its span from mountain slope to floodplain,diversity of habitats, and key location as a wildlifecorridor, the SDC property is central to sustainingthe ecological integrity of Sonoma Valley and thegreater North Bay. In addition to its importancefor native plant and wildlife species, the propertyprovides stunning views, accessible recreationalopportunities, groundwater recharge, moderation of local climate change effects, and a beautiful and enriching setting for local residents. It iscritical that any transition of the SDC property provides safeguards for this important land, ensuringthe protection of the area’s wildlife passage, habitat connectivity, and biological diversity.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY

C RIT IC A L WILD LIFE CO R R ID O RA ND BIOLOGICAL D IVER SITYSonoma County is recognized as one of the mostbiologically diverse regions in California and theentire United States, and SDC supports a crosssection of this diversity. The undeveloped portions of SDC—about 700 acres—include forests,woodlands, and grasslands rich in native species,wetlands, and lakes, as well as a rich riparian corridor. Plant communities present on SDC support an abundance and diversity of animals, allwith a complex suite of life history requirements,including nearly 130 documented bird speciesas well as threatened and endangered wildlifespecies. The property itself is large and diverseenough to sustain a wide variety and abundanceof wildlife through part or all of its life cycle.The SDC property sits adjacent to a number ofmajor private and public lands that add to itsvalue as a connective passage for wildlife. TheSonoma County Agricultural Preservation andOpen Space District maintains conservationeasements on a number of proximal, privatelyowned properties that are protected for theirOn a larger, regional scale, SDC is positionedin a critical linkage corridor for wildlife. TheSonoma Valley Wildlife Corridor (Corridor) running through SDC encompasses approximately10,000 acres, and stretches from the top ofSonoma Mountain across Sonoma Creek andthe valley floor to the Mayacamas Mountains tothe east. The Corridor is part of a much largernetwork of linkages connecting habitats in MarinCounty to those in the Blue Ridge Mountains/Lake Berryessa area in eastern Napa County. TheSDC property includes a critical, three-quartermile-wide, five-mile-long pinch point that servesas one of the only habitat passages across theSonoma Valley. This corridor is a vital connection for wildlife movement within the Bay Areaand ensures the region is connected to largeundeveloped landscape blocks to the northand south. The Bay Area Open Space Council’s2011 Conservation Lands Network effort andthe Critical Linkages: The Bay Area and Beyondreport recognized the Sonoma Valley WildlifeCorridor as a high priority for conservation.SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY11

SDC CRITICAL LINKAGE: MARIN COAST TO MAYACAMAS MOUNTAINSSanta RosaMayacaainsun tMoasmidorõE?CorrSonomaGlenEllenWilifeÝE?omaom aSonS onekCreM ouSonomannt a iMarin Coast to Blue RidgeCritical alCenterUrbanAreasCountyBoundaryMendocinoLakeeto Bkaglu e Rid ge C ritic al Li oSonVamaylleldSonomaÆI Area of DetailNapa!11224MileslumaCoastPacific OceanMarinSeptember 2015erRiv0PetaHighwaySDCMarinMarinLakevilleSONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDYData: Critical Linkage, Conservation Lands Network 2015; Terrain, USGS 10M DEM shaded relief; Roads & County, TIGER US Census 2010; Hydrography, NHD 2014; Urban Service Areas, Sonoma County General Plan 2008.

viewsheds, wildlife corridors, and other conservation values. SDC is also adjacent to publicand private lands such as the nearly 1,500-acreJack London State Historic Park, the 162-acreSonoma Valley Regional Park, the 820-acreNorth Sonoma Mountain Regional Park andOpen Space Preserve, the 535-acre BouveriePreserve, and various properties owned or protected through conservation easements by theSonoma Land Trust.G ROU NDWATER RECH ARGEPermeable soils are essential for capturing precipitation and storing it as groundwater. Withover 700 acres of relatively undeveloped land,much of it on gentle slopes, SDC provides anexpansive groundwater recharge area. Slowlyreleased into streams long after the rainy season ends, groundwater is critical for maintainingsufficient summer flows in Sonoma Creek and itstributaries to support steelhead, riparian habitat, and a host of wildlife that depend on cool,clean, abundant summer water. Groundwateralso supplies half of the commercial and residential water demand in Sonoma Valley. TheSonoma County Water Agency’s TechnicalMemorandum “Review of Water Resources forSonoma Developmental Center” recommendsthat “care should be taken to limit the potential for any additional groundwater developmentto impact spring and stream flows at the SDCproperty” (Sonoma Developmental Center DraftResource Assessment, April 2015, p. 18). In addition, the Basin Advisory Panel, which was formedby the Sonoma County Water Agency, the Valleyof the Moon Water District, and City of Sonoma,highlights the need to be aware and protectiveof areas for groundwater recharge.CL I MATE MI TI G ATI O N AN DAD APTATI O NNorth Bay Climate Adaptation Initiative estimates that Sonoma, Marin, and Napa counties “should anticipate summer temperaturesincreasing by approximately 6 to 8 F, on average, in our region by approximately the end ofthe century with a likelihood of an increase inthe frequency and intensity of extreme eventssuch as droughts and floods.” These projectedchanges could result in a wide assortment ofSONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY13

deleterious effects including more need forgroundwater and surface water with eithersmaller total precipitation or extreme, shortduration storm events with more runoff and lessrainwater infiltration, increased fire risk, changesin pests and disease vectors due t

SONOMA DEVELOPMENTAL CENTER: SITE TRANSFORMATION STUDY 5 Few residents of the Sonoma Valley are unaffected by the changes facing the Sonoma Developmental Center (SDC). The Developmental Center has been a signifi cant employer in Sonoma County for over a century and is widely utilized by the community for rec-reation and enjoyment.

Related Documents:

Sonoma County Hazard Mitigation Plan M ITIGATION S TRATEGY APRIL 201 7 Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department 2550 Ventura Avenue . Santa Rosa, CA 95403 . Sonoma County Fire and Emergency Services Department . 2300 County Center Drive, Suite B220 . Santa Rosa, CA 95403 . Adopted by Resolution No. 1 7-XXXX of the Sonoma County .

Sonoma State University occupies 269 acres in the beautiful wine country of Sonoma County, in Northern California. Located at the foot of the Sonoma hills, the campus is just an hour's drive north of San Francisco and 40 minutes away from the Pacific Ocean. What's special about SSU? Sonoma State University, a small campus of 9,100 welcoming .

Sonoma Chocolatiers Business Plan Page 4 Sonoma Chocolatiers has added about two new wholesale customers a week for the last year. Highlights Sonoma Chocolatiers, comprising of "Infusions Teahouse" and "Sonoma Chocolatiers", is a start-up in the Sebastopol area of Sonoma County, California.It is a privately held corporation, managed by its owners, David Gambill and Susan

The Sonoma State experience is all about community, and with nearly 200 student-led clubs and organizations on campus, including 20 active sororities and fraternities, there is a place in the Seawolf community for everyone. sonoma.edu/campuslife. With . 4,200 acres. of preserved lands just beyond the campus, you can take your education outside .

SONOMA COUNTY REENTRY RESOURCES. Note: Some services may have changed due to COVID-19, please call to confirm hours and services available. TRANSPORTATION . Sonoma County Transit "Provides local and intercity public transportation services in Sonoma County, California" Location: 355 W. Robles Ave, Santa Rosa, CA 95407 . Contact: (707) 576-7433

President, Magazine Division Sonoma Media Investments, LLC 427 Mendocino Avenue. Santa Rosa, CA 95401 P: 707.521.5284 steve.childs@sonomamag.com The Heart OF WINE COUNTRY Wine & Spirits . 2019 Sonoma Magazine Media Kit Author: Andrea Raschke for Sonoma Media Investments LLC Subject:

File: SCEIP Business Plan.doc Date Authored: August 2019 BUSINESS PLAN for the Sonoma County Energy Independence Program . 2300 County Center Drive, Suite A105 Santa Rosa, CA 95403 . . This document is the business plan for the Sonoma County Energy Independence Program as of August 2019, looking out to the y ear 2023. .

The American Osteopathic Board of Radiology will not require a written attestation as a requirement for examination or certification. No. 11 In the osteopathic profession, the American Osteopathic Board of Radiology reviews and approves the eligibility of candidates whose training has been reviewed and approved by the American Osteopathic College of Radiology (AOCR). In 1982, the AOCR training .