Blakey, Dusty (Chair) - Absent Dallas, Patricia Jackson, Michael .
SCR 22 Education Technology Task ForceAssistive TechnologyGoal: Review the current condition of technology in the public education classrooms and educationalsettings of the State and prepare a plan to outline actions that support Delaware becoming thepremier state for utilizing technology in pre- kindergarten to grade 12 education.As a result of the work of this subcommittee, we will :(g) Recommend a phased plan for the implementation of the State educational technology plan;(h) Recommend a funding plan for the implementation of the State educational technology plan;(i) Recommend a plan to track and assess progress in the implementation of goals set forth in theState Educational Technology Plan.Subcommittee MembersBlakey, Dusty (Chair) - AbsentDallas, PatriciaJackson, Michael - AbsentKorobkin, MatthewMineo, BethSCR 22 Sub-Committee Meeting #1 – Assistive Technology8/10/15
SCR 22 Education Technology Task ForceAssistive TechnologyGoal: Review the current condition of technology in the public education classrooms and educationalsettings of the State and prepare a plan to outline actions that support Delaware becoming thepremier state for utilizing technology in pre- kindergarten to grade 12 education.Essential Question: How can we determine the current use of educational technology, assistive technology andinstructional materials for students with special needs and incorporate, as appropriate, the work from theDepartment of Education’s comprehensive review of the delivery of special education services, including assistivetechnology, authorized by Section 307 of the FY 2015 budget epilogue?Leading Ideas Matt Korobkin (Special Education Officer) is conducting a statewide assessment of all SPED PD, including PDon AT which can help inform this work. Beth Mineo (Director of UD CDS and DATI) has DATI data, CDS data, AIM data, and ACCESS data to informthis work. Beth Mineo has survey data on district AT use and has the surveys which could possibly be administered todetermine needsAnalysisCollective KnowledgeWhat we already know? Additional Knowledge NeededWhat more do we need to know? District Data Gathering - QIAT Indicators students access to assistive technology Identifying different types of assistive technology Professional Development Outside Sources Formal Evaluation (IDEA)Overall # of studentsConnecticut Assistive Technology DocumentsACCESS to the assessmentPrevious Surveys as a template to create a new surveyUsing explicit language in the classroom to ensurethat it shows how great assistive technology could befor every studentDATI utilization data (data is by lifespan but can pulldata by age)Virginia – does assistive technology well How are we defining students with disabilities?How do students who don't used assistive technologyare trained to work with student who are usingassistive technology?Survey for teachers on assistive technology (QIATIndicators/Educators Knowledge of Law and Policy/Awareness of Technology)IEPs that include AIM/ assistive technology versuswhat actually plays out in the classroom?At what point do we know assistive technology isneeded (Birth – 5 years of age); threshold variesgreatly at a younger age?Staffing – cases/qualificationsOne-stop shop for informationWhat services we offer to help educate parents aboutwhat currently exist?Decision Points Send Educator Surveys (Previous Years) – Beth Mineo; To review and develop as a new toolStates doing assistive technology well - Virginia, Wisconsin, Indiana (Connecticut) Identify lessons learned What they did wellDATI (Delaware Assistive Technology Initiative) Utilization Data by Age/ Need/ Type of Tech (Beth Mineo)QIAT Templates (Matthew Korobkin by September)AT Staffing Data – Matthew KorobkinIDEA Law (Reg) – Mathew KorobkinSCR 22 Sub-Committee Meeting #1 – Assistive Technology8/10/15
SCR 22 Education Technology Task ForceAssistive TechnologyGoal: Review the current condition of technology in the public education classrooms and educationalsettings of the State and prepare a plan to outline actions that support Delaware becoming thepremier state for utilizing technology in pre- kindergarten to grade 12 education.Essential Question: How can we recommend strategies and goals for improving and equalizing access to and use ofeducational technology and assistive technology in all public school systems across the State, including State-run schools?Leading Ideas AnalysisCollective KnowledgeWhat we already know?Additional Knowledge NeededWhat more do we need to know?Decision Points TBD – Tabled until next subcommittee meeting based on the data collected from the previous EQSCR 22 Sub-Committee Meeting #1 – Assistive Technology8/10/15
SCR 22 Education Technology Task ForceAssistive TechnologyGoal: Review the current condition of technology in the public education classrooms and educationalsettings of the State and prepare a plan to outline actions that support Delaware becoming thepremier state for utilizing technology in pre- kindergarten to grade 12 education.Essential Question: How can we determine the need for improved ongoing professional development in theintegration of technology, assistive technology, and the utilization of the State educational technology standards, inteaching?Leading Ideas Matt Korobkin is conducting a PD assessment of all districts and will be able to isolate AT related PD Beth Mineo has information on CDS related PD Analysis Collective KnowledgeWhat we already know?Every school district in the state has been askedto provide a PD inventory all PD provided to theireducators; MK can filter out assistive technology Additional Knowledge NeededWhat more do we need to know?Opportunity for personalized consults forteachers encountering new assistive technologyThe role of paraprofessional – areas they in themix in PDDecision Points Every school district in the state has been asked to provide a PD inventory all all PD provided to theireducators; MK can filter out assistive technology (included paraprofessionals)DATA - SPEACS Initiative, UDL, DATI PD, AIM PD, ACCESS Project (Adapting books)Early Childhood Data - Beth MineoInclusion Conference (Beth)AT PD – ATIA/ ABLETrish provide analysis on advocacy group and PD relates to themSCR 22 Sub-Committee Meeting #1 – Assistive Technology8/10/15
SCR 22 Education Technology Task ForceAssistive TechnologyGoal: Review the current condition of technology in the public education classrooms and educationalsettings of the State and prepare a plan to outline actions that support Delaware becoming thepremier state for utilizing technology in pre- kindergarten to grade 12 education.Essential Question: How can we determine the current readiness of staff to teach using educational technology in theState’s public education classrooms and education settings and determine the need for improved ongoingprofessional development in the integration of assistive technology in teaching and utilization of the Stateeducational technology standards?Leading Ideas Analysis Collective KnowledgeWhat we already know?How can you determine the readiness- surveyKinds of AT – describe comfort level (surveysuggestion)Teacher council – survey on personalized learningAbsence of guidance stalls the systems –guidance docs would empower teachers themake decisionsExplore the idea of key informant interviewsReview State technology standards (Trish) Additional Knowledge NeededWhat more do we need to know?How accessible are the curriculums that come tous?Has staff every had formal training (through acredit barring course) – via surveyAre teachers aware of the state technologystandards?Decision Points Inventory/ Procurement – how are we tracking what already exists in our districtsSCR 22 Sub-Committee Meeting #1 – Assistive Technology8/10/15
SCR 22 Education Technology Task ForceAssistive TechnologyWrap-UpMajor Decision PointsPlease combine decision points from previous pages/EQ 1 States doing assistive technology well - Virginia, Wisconsin, Indiana (Connecticut) Identify lessons learned What they did wellDistricts with strong systems – Dusty Blakey (Colonial Best Practices)DeliverablesWhatWhoWhenExample: Teacher SurveyReview and assess Educator SurveysExample: Subcommittee Chair PersonBeth MineoExample: By next Sept. MeetingTo review and develop as a new toolGather and review DATI (DelawareAssistive Technology Initiative)Utilization Data by Age/ Need/ Typeof TechBeth MineoShare QIAT TemplatesMathew KorobkinShare IDEA language on ATMatthew KorobkinTrish to review Connecticut AssistiveTechnology Docs to review ECSubcommitteeMatt and Beth contact out of stateassistive technology liaisonsMatt & BethEarly Childhood DataBethInclusion ConferenceBethBy SeptemberBy Next MeetingAs a result of the work of this subcommittee, we will:(j) Recommend a phased plan for the implementation of the State educational technology plan;(k) Recommend a funding plan for the implementation of the State educational technology plan;(l) Recommend a plan to track and assess progress in the implementation of goals set forth in the StateEducational Technology Plan.SCR 22 Sub-Committee Meeting #1 – Assistive Technology8/10/15
Matt and Beth contact out of state assistive technology liaisons Early Childhood Data Inclusion Conference Beth Mineo Beth Mineo Mathew Korobkin Matthew Korobkin Subcommittee Matt & Beth Beth Beth To review and develop as a new tool By September By Next Meeting As a result of the work of this subcommittee, we will:
Typing Test 1 2290100001 AMIT 45 41 Not Qualified 86.00 2 2290100002 Vikram Singh Absent Absent N.A. Absent 3 2290100003 RAVINDER KUMAR Absent Absent N.A. Absent 4 2290100004 SANJEET KUMAR 33 46 Not Eligible 79.00 5 2290100005 MOHIT 39 34 Not Eligible 73
Page 6 GO ON 1 The main purpose of paragraphs 7 and 8 is to — A show that Dusty takes items from only two of Chu’s neighbors B explain that Chu’s neighbors aren’t bothered when Dusty takes their personal items C emphasize that Chu’s neighbors deliberately leave objects lying around for Dusty D describe how Dusty carefully chooses the items he takes from Chu’s neighbors
Mr. Daniels Present Dr. Hollandsworth Present Mr. Speiser Present Dr. Dunn Present Mrs. Planicka Absent Mrs. Berkley Absent Mr. Meranda Approve Mr. Yockey Approve Mr. Daniels Approve Dr. Hollandsworth Approve Mr. Speiser Approved Dr. Dunn Absent 9/9 Mrs. Planicka Absent 10/12 Mrs. Berkley Absent 10/12
Viracon 144,960 East Dallas Icon Owner Pool 1 Texas LLC 67,372 Northeast Dallas Impact Floors 138,317 Northwest Dallas Factory Blue 65,814 Great Southwest/Arlington Captex Development 138,317 Northwest Dallas Xylem 65,409 Northwest Dallas Alliance Glass & Metal 136,825 Northeast Dallas
1036 RISD Academy - 13630 Coit Road Dallas, TX 75240 1037 RISD Academy - 13630 Coit Road Dallas, TX 75240 1038 A M Aikin Elem School - 12300 Pleasant Valley Dr Dallas, TX 75243 1039 Lake Highlands High School - 9449 Church Rd Dallas, TX 75238 1040 Dallas Fire Station #57 - 10801 Audelia Rd Dallas, TX 75238
1036 RISD Academy - 13630 Coit Road Dallas, TX 75240 1037 RISD Academy - 13630 Coit Road Dallas, TX 75240 1038 A M Aikin Elem School - 12300 Pleasant Valley Dr Dallas, TX 75243 1039 Lake Highlands High School - 9449 Church Road Dallas, TX 75238 1040 Dallas Fire Station #57 - 10801 Audelia Rd Dallas, TX 75238
NON-CME SYMPOSIA HOTEL MAP Fairmont Dallas 1717 N Akard St. Dallas, TX 75201 Hyatt Regency Dallas 300 Reunion Blvd. Dallas, TX 75207 214-651-1234 Sheraton Dallas Hotel 400 N Olive St. Dallas, TX 75201 214-922-8000 See the ATS Final Program and the Exhibit & Innovation Guide for a complete list and map of ATS 2019 hotels.
Andhra Pradesh State Council of Higher Education w.e.f. 2015-16 (Revised in April, 2016) B.A./B.Sc. FIRST YEAR MATHEMATICS SYLLABUS SEMESTER –I, PAPER - 1 DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS 60 Hrs UNIT – I (12 Hours), Differential Equations of first order and first degree : Linear Differential Equations; Differential Equations Reducible to Linear Form; Exact Differential Equations; Integrating Factors .
