OECD Economic Surveys Korea

1y ago
3 Views
2 Downloads
1.76 MB
57 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Angela Sonnier
Transcription

OECD Economic omic-snapshot/

This Overview is extracted from the 2020 Economic Survey of Korea. The Survey is publishedon the responsibility of the Economic and Development Review Committee of the OECD, whichis charged with the examination of the economic situation of member countries.This document, as well as any data and any map included herein, are without prejudice to the statusof or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundariesand to the name of any territory, city or area.The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeliauthorities. The use of such data by the OECD is without prejudice to the status of the GolanHeights, East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements in the West Bank under the terms of internationallaw.OECD Economic Surveys: Korea OECD 2020You can copy, download or print OECD content for your own use, and you can include excerpts fromOECD publications, databases and multimedia products in your own documents, presentations,blogs, websites and teaching materials, provided that suitable acknowledgement of OECD as sourceand copyright owner is given. All requests for public or commercial use and translation rights shouldbe submitted to rights@oecd.org. Requests for permission to photocopy portions of this materialfor public or commercial use shall be addressed directly to the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) atinfo@copyright.com or the Centre français d’exploitation du droit de copie (CFC) atcontact@cfcopies.com.tatus of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation ofinternational frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area.

3Table of contentsExecutive summary81 Key policy insights13The economy will recover gradually from the COVID-19 crisisThe recovery will probably be slow and uncertainty is exceptionally highMonetary policy is accommodative but inflation remains below the 2% targetStrong public finances allow stimulating the economyThe financial system remains solid, but the COVID-19 crisis raises vulnerabilityThe fruits of Korea’s past economic performance have not been equally distributedKorea’s economic achievements have not fully translated into well-beingBetter use of labour resources and innovation can support growthThe fight against corruption has been stepped up but challenges remainEnvironmental quality remains low by OECD standardsReferencesAnnex 1.A. Progress in other structural reform areasAnnex 1.B. Government measures to address the COVID-19 crisisAnnex 1.C. Economic co-operation with North ESFigure 1. GDP falls less than in the OECDFigure 2. Inflation is set to remain very lowFigure 3. Inequality is relatively highFigure 4. The old age dependency ratio will soarFigure 5. Service sector productivity is laggingFigure 1.1. Mobility for retail and recreation has remained relatively highFigure 1.2. The COVID-19 crisis has hit employment hard, albeit less than in most other countriesFigure 1.3. Employment drops in services and among non-regular workersFigure 1.4. Exports are fairly concentrated in terms of countries and product types (%), 2018Figure 1.5. The outlook for global semi-conductors remains uncertainFigure 1.6. Inflation is well below the 2% targetFigure 1.7. Monetary policy has been eased and the won has depreciated somewhatFigure 1.8. Sound public finances leave room for fiscal stimulusFigure 1.9. Potential impact of the COVID-19 crisis on gross government debtFigure 1.10. The unweighted leverage ratio is close to the OECD averageFigure 1.11. Aggregate corporate debt is moderate but rising and household debt is highFigure 1.12. At the national level, housing prices have been stableFigure 1.13. Income inequality is relatively highFigure 1.14. The minimum wage is high relative to the median wage, 2018Figure 1.15. Permanent workers’ employment protection is relatively strongOECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020910101111131617181920212222232425272829

4 Figure 1.16. Well-being scores remain relatively low in many dimensionsFigure 1.17. Korea has scope to raise both employment and productivityFigure 1.18. Fewer individuals work very long hours as time limits were tightened towards OECD normsFigure 1.19. Low-productivity sectors account for a high share of total employmentFigure 1.20. Digital gaps between large and small firms remain highFigure 1.21. Product market regulations are stringentFigure 1.22. Corruption is perceived as relatively highFigure 1.23. Korea is compliant on tax transparencyFigure 1.24. Environmental performance remains weak303134363839404143Annex Figure 1.C.1. North Korea’s recorded foreign tradeAnnex Figure 1.C.2. Estimated GDP level and growth rate5455TABLESTable 1. The recovery will be slowTable 1.1. Policies to support the Korean economyTable 1.2. Macroeconomic indicators and projections under two epidemiological scenariosTable 1.3. Events that could lead to major changes in the outlookTable 1.4. Past recommendations on fiscal policyTable 1.5. Past recommendations on financial policyTable 1.6. Past recommendations on the labour market and inclusivenessTable 1.7. Past recommendations on promoting female employmentTable 1.8. Overview of the Korean New Deal projectsTable 1.9. Past recommendations on regulation and support for SMEs and innovationTable 1.10. Past recommendations on corruptionTable 1.11. Past recommendations on environmental policy91518192325293237394144OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

5OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

6 This Survey is published on the responsibility of the Economic andDevelopment Review Committee of the OECD, which is charged with theexamination of the economic situation of member countries.The economic situation and policies of Korea were reviewed by theCommittee on 23 June 2020. The draft report was then revised in light ofthe discussions and given final approval as the agreed report of the wholeCommittee on 27 July 2020.The Secretariat’s draft report was prepared for the Committee byChristophe André, Jinwoan Beom and Mathilde Pak, under the supervisionof Vincent Koen. Alexander Hijzen and Stefan Thewissen, from theDirectorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs (ELS), providedsections on the labour market and the OECD’s new Jobs Strategy. YvanGuillemette and Andrés Fuentes Hutfilter also contributed to the report.Research assistance was provided by Lutécia Daniel, Natia Mosiashvili andAgnès Puymoyen, and editorial support by Sisse Nielsen and MichelleOrtiz.The previous Survey of Korea was issued in June 2018.Information about the latest as well as previous Surveys and more detailsabout how Surveys are prepared is available at www.oecd.org/eco/surveys.OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

7BASIC STATISTICS OF KOREA, 2018(Numbers in parentheses refer to the OECD average) 1, 2LAND, PEOPLE AND ELECTORAL CYCLEPopulation (million)Under 15 (%)Over 65 (%)International migrant stock (% ofpopulation, 2015)Latest 5-year average growth (%)Gross domestic product (GDP)In current prices (billion USD)In current prices (trillion KRW)Latest 5-year average real growth (201418,%)Per capita (000 USD ation density per km²Life expectancy at birth (years, 2017)Men (2017)Women (2017)Latest general electionECONOMYValue added shares (%)Agriculture, forestry and fishingIndustry including construction1 725.21 (77.5)85.7(82.9)April ENERAL GOVERNMENTPer cent of GDPExpenditureRevenue30.333.4(40.3)(37.4)Gross financial debt (2017)EXTERNAL ACCOUNTSExchange rate (KRW per USD)PPP exchange rate (USA 1)In per cent of GDPExports of goods and servicesImports of goods and servicesCurrent account balanceNet international investment )Main exports (% of total merchandise exports)Machinery and transport equipmentChemicals and related products, n.e.s.Manufactured goodsMain imports (% of total merchandise imports)Machinery and transport equipmentMineral fuels, lubricants and related materialsChemicals and related products, n.e.s.57.413.412.331.227.210.3LABOUR MARKET, SKILLS AND INNOVATIONEmployment rate (aged 15 and over, %)60.7(57.3)MenWomenParticipation rate (aged 15 and over, %)Average hours worked per year70.850.963.11 993(65.5)(49.6)(60.5)(1734)Unemployment rate, Labour Force Survey (aged 15 andover, %)Youth (aged 15-24, %)Long-term unemployed (1 year and over, %)Tertiary educational attainment (aged 25-64, %)Gross domestic expenditure on R&D (% of GDP, 2.1( 8.9)ENVIRONMENTTotal primary energy supply per capita (toe)5.6(4.1)Renewables (%)Exposure to air pollution (more than 10 g/m³ ofPM 2.5, % of population, 2017)1.9(10.5)CO2 emissions from fuel combustion per capita(tonnes)Water abstractions per capita (1 000 m³, 2016)99.2(58.7)Municipal waste per capita (tonnes, 2016, OECD: 2017)0.50.4(0.5)SOCIETYIncome inequality (Gini coefficient, 2017,OECD: 2016)Relative poverty rate (%, 2017, OECD: 2016)Median disposable household income (000USD PPP, 2017, OECD: 2016)Public and private spending (% of GDP)Health carePensions (2017, OECD: 2015)Education (public, 2017)0.355(0.310)Education outcomes (PISA 29.7)(0.4)ScienceShare of women in parliament (%)Net official development assistance (% of GNI, 2017)1. The year is indicated in parenthesis if it deviates from the year in the main title of this table.2. Where the OECD aggregate is not provided in the source database, a simple OECD average of latest available data is calculated where dataexist for at least 80% member countries.Source: Calculations based on data extracted from databases of the following organisations: OECD, International Energy Agency, InternationalLabour Organisation, International Monetary Fund, World Bank.OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

8 Executive summaryOECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

9COVID-19 triggered a deep recessionEconomic activity has fallen sharply. TheKorean authorities have reacted promptly tocontain the spread of the virus and to support theeconomy. Even so, GDP is contracting, albeitmarkedly less than in other OECD countries(Figure 1).Travel and leisure-related sectors have been hitparticularly hard and are recovering onlygradually. Manufacturing is affected by the globalcollapse in demand, notably for petrochemicals andcars. The crisis will leave durable scars and willheighten the need to tackle challenges associatedwith population ageing and low productivity to boostgrowth.Employment is shrinking. The recession isdriving down employment, particularly for nonregular workers. The government will need toinvest further in active labour market policies toensure an employment-rich and high-productivityrecovery.Figure 1. GDP falls less than in the OECD104102Korea, Single-hitOECD, Single-hitKorea, Double-hitOECD, Double-hit100989694929088201920202021Source: OECD Economic Outlook Database.StatLink 2 https://doi.org/10.1787/888934156485The global recession will slow the recovery.While domestic-oriented activity will normalisegradually, the global recession will hold backexports and investment, even assuming noresurgence of the pandemic (single-hit scenario). Asecond global wave of infections (double-hitscenario) would delay the recovery in consumptionand exports, further depress investment and pushup unemployment (Table 1).OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020A permanent slump in world trade is adownside risk. As an export-oriented economy,Korea is vulnerable to further weakness in foreigndemand and to lasting disruptions in global valuechains.Table 1. The recovery will be slowSingle-hitGross domestic productPrivate sUnemployment rateConsumer price indexCurrent account balance(% of GDP)Generalgovernmentbudget balance (% 13.62.22.11.91.10.9-2.8-2.8-3.1-3.6Source: OECD Economic Outlook 107 projections updated to takeinto account incoming data through 23 July 2020.Fiscal policy is very expansionary. Thegovernment is appropriately using the fiscal spaceoffered by strong public finances, with generalgovernment gross debt at around 40% of GDP, todamp the impact of the crisis. The budget balanceis projected to move from a surplus in 2019 to adeficit of more than 3% of GDP in 2020 in thedouble-hit scenario and 2.8% of GDP in the singlehit scenario. Fiscal policy needs to continuesupporting the economy. Additional stimulusthrough growth-enhancing investments couldstrengthen the recovery.Monetary policy is accommodative. The Bank ofKorea cut its policy rate by 50 basis points in March2020 and by another 25 basis points in May, to0.50%, and implemented a range of measures toincrease liquidity in response to the crisis. Withinflation projected to remain very low (Figure 2),monetary policy should remain accommodative. Asthere is limited room left for significant policy ratecuts, the Bank of Korea should be prepared toconsiderunconventionalmonetarypolicymeasures, going beyond liquidity support.The crisis raises financial vulnerability. Themagnitude of the COVID-19 crisis creates risks forfinancial stability, especially corporate debt, assome businesses, notably SMEs, are heavily

10 indebted. Some households will also struggle torepay their debt. Nevertheless, Korea’s financialsystem is protected by a number of buffers. Thefinancial authorities have taken determined actionto address financial risks and now appear to havestabilised financial markets.Figure 2. Inflation is set to remain very low0.8%CPI, Single-hitCPI, Double-hitCore inflation¹, Single hitCore inflation¹ , Double-hit0.70.6Old-age poverty is still high. More than 40% ofpeople aged 65 or over live in relative poverty, thehighest rate in the OECD, albeit on a decliningtrend. Old-age poverty is driven by limited pensionincome, partly due to the immature pensionsystem, and low earnings for many of those stillworking, despite often long working hours.Figure 3. Inequality is relatively ACHLNote: The Gini coefficient ranges from 0 (no inequality) to 1(maximum inequality). For the OECD, unweighted average.Source: OECD, Income Distribution Database.0.10DNK2019202020211. Excluding food and energy.Source: OECD Economic Outlook Database.StatLink 2 https://doi.org/10.1787/888934156504Well-being and inclusiveness needstrengtheningKorea scores poorly in some well-beingdimensions. The country’s outstanding incomegrowth over the past decades has yet to fullytranslate into high well-being, notably in terms ofperceived health, environmental quality and worklife balance.Income inequality is relatively high, due towage dispersion and limited redistribution(Figure 3). A dual labour market and partly relatedlarge differences in productivity between large firmsand SMEs, and between industry and services,generate strong wage inequality. Redistributionthrough taxes and benefits is weaker than in mostother OECD countries. Female employment isrelatively low and the gender wage gap is thehighest in the OECD. Inequalities are exacerbatedby the COVID-19 crisis, which affectsdisproportionately those with the weakest labourmarket positions.StatLink 2 https://doi.org/10.1787/888934156523Air pollution is a major issue. Most of thepopulation is exposed to high levels of smallparticle air pollution, with detrimental impacts onhealth and well-being. Although the governmenthas taken significant steps to curb air pollution,more is needed.Renewable energy investments will help greenthe recovery. Energy generation is stilloverwhelmingly reliant on fossil fuels, and low oilprices risk delaying the transition to cleaner energysources. The government has setambitioustargets for the share of renewables in electricitygeneration, which should rise from about 8.3% in2018 to 20% by 2030 and 30-35% by 2040.Boosting investment in renewable energy andclean technologies would help achieve asustainable recovery.Ageing and digitalisation createchallenges and opportunitiesKorea’s population is ageing rapidly, butdigitalisation could raise productivity. The oldage dependency ratio will be the highest in theOECD by 2060 (Figure 4). Korea has potential tobuild on its advanced IT technology to fosterinnovation and raise productivity. The recentlyannounced Korean New Deal, which will boostOECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

11digital, green and skills investments, has thepotential to support a green and inclusive recovery.Figure 4. The old age dependency ratio PNNote: Ratio of population aged 65 and over to population aged 15-64.Unweighted average for the OECDSource: United Nations and OECD calculations.StatLink 2 https://doi.org/10.1787/888934156542The shrinking labour supply tends to lower theeconomy’s growth potential. According to theOECD long-term model, Korea’s annual GDP percapita growth was set to slow to a pace similar tothat of other OECD countries. The COVID-19 crisisis likely to pull down Korean and global growthfurther. However, there is scope for raisingemployment rates and productivity to lift GDP percapita growth by one to almost two percentagepoints.The new OECD Jobs Strategy suggests ways toboost employment and foster inclusive growth.Raising the employment rate and quality of jobs ofKorean women, who are on average highly skilled,should be a priority. Moreover, there is a need toenhance the quality of jobs for older workers, whotend to retire late but often end their working livesin low-quality jobs, and to facilitate youth’s accessto employment, especially through enhancedvocational training and career guidance.Social protection should be strengthened. TheCOVID-19 crisis illustrates the vulnerability of nonregular workers to economic shocks, despiteemergency measures to support households andbusinesses. Along with stronger social protection,easing labour market regulations once the COVID19 crisis is overcome would promote thereallocation of workers towards their mostproductive use and reduce labour market duality.OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020While social protection schemes have beengradually extended, compliance remains achallenge.Shifting the focus of active labour market policyfrom direct job creation, which accounted for abouthalf of spending before the crisis, to training and jobcounselling, along with enhanced adult education,would enhance job quality. The crisis-time publicjob creations need to be complemented by furtherinvestments in human capital.Productivity varies widely across economicsectors. Productivity is outstanding in ITmanufacturing and strong in other manufacturing,but lagging in services, including IT services(Figure 5). The gap is also wide between big firmsand SMEs. Narrowing those gaps is key to raisingaggregate productivity.Technology diffusion is uneven. Use ofadvanced IT technologies like cloud computing andbig data is lagging in SMEs, which face difficultiesin recruiting skilled workers and managers andtraining their workforce. Scale-up success islimited, despite extensive government R&Dsupport.Product market regulations remain stringent,holding back competition and productivity growth.The government has introduced a programme toshift the burden of proof from the regulated to theregulator and regulatory sandboxes to allow firmsin new technologies and new industries to test theirproducts and business models without beingsubject to all existing legal requirements.Figure 5. Service sector productivity is lagging%350OECDKorea300250200150100500ICT manufacturingOther manufacturingICT servicesOther businessservicesNote: Sectors' productivity relative to total productivity.Source: OECD STAN Database.StatLink 2 https://doi.org/10.1787/888934156561

12 MAIN FINDINGSKEY RECOMMENDATIONSPolicies to mitigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemicThe government has taken a wide range of measures to support households and Continue to provide support to households and businesses until the economy isbusinesses during the crisis. Prolonging some current temporary measures and/or recovering, targeting any additional income support towards low-incomeproviding additional support may be necessary if the crisis lingers.households.Ensure that fiscal plans preserve long-term fiscal sustainability.Sound public finances allow further stimulus to strengthen the recovery.Support growth-enhancing investments, notably in digital fields, such as 5Ginfrastructure and artificial intelligence.Perform cost-benefit analysis of investments.Inflation is set to remain very low over the coming years, the economic recovery Maintain accommodative monetary policy and consider unconventional measuresis likely to be slow and macro-prudential tools are in place to ensure financial going beyond liquidity support.stability.Raising employment and enhancing job quality in the face of COVID-19 and rapid ageingSocial protection for non-regular workers and workers in small companies remains Strengthen protection and coverage for non-regular workers and workers in newweak, exposing them more to the COVID-19 shock, and significant coverage gaps forms of employment (e.g. platform workers) and increase compliance with socialin Employment Insurance remain.insurance through more effective enforcement.About half of spending on active labour market policy is for direct job creation. Adjust resources for the public employment service and training programmes toPublic employment service resources are limited. Funding for training maintain effective support for jobseekers.programmes has increased in response to the COVID-19 crisis.Korea has no statutory (or coherent privately-regulated) cash sickness benefit,causing hardship and complicating return to work. However, crisis measures weretaken in the context of COVID-19. The New Deal includes a sickness benefitimplementation study in 2021 and a pilot project for households, including lowincome families, in 2022.Workers are often forced to retire from their career job in their fifties for variousreasons, leading to a waste of human resources and worsening old-age poverty.The mandatory retirement age was increased to 60 in 2016-17.Match the introduction of a cash sickness benefit planned in the New Deal with astrong focus on rehabilitation and return to work.Expand incentives for workers and employers to ensure that workers stay longerin their career jobs, including through more flexibility in wages, with the view toraising the minimum mandatory retirement age further over time.Increasing inclusiveness during the COVID-19 crisis and afterThe old-age poverty rate is the highest in the OECD, partly due to the immature Further increase the Basic Pension and focus it on the elderly in absolutepension system, but also to low and restricted means-tested support, despite poverty.recent improvements.As planned under the New Deal, phase out the family support obligation from theBasic Livelihood Security Programme.The gender wage gap is the largest in the OECD.Regularly publish a national-level analysis of wage difference determinants topromote fairer wages across genders.Promoting the diffusion of technology to tackle the COVID-19 shock and to boost productivity and well-beingProduct market regulations remain tight. However, the government has introduced Use regulatory sandboxes to identify excessive regulation and revise or abolish it.a programme to shift the burden of proof from the regulated to the regulator and Facilitate telemedicine, as long as it is compatible with preserving patient safetyregulatory sandboxes are allowing firms in new technologies and new industries and quality of care.to test their products and business models without being subject to all existinglegal requirements. The temporary lifting of the ban on telemedicine during theCOVID-19 outbreak illustrates the potential benefits of a timely review ofregulations.Subsidies to SMEs have limited effects on promoting growth and boosting Subsidies to SMEs should focus more on promoting growth and boostinginnovation and productivity. Despite the efforts of the Korean government to better innovation and productivity. Provide SMEs in manufacturing and services withinnovation vouchers that can be used to commission R&D and studies on potentialtarget subsidies, the latter still allow the survival of low-productivity companies.for new technology introduction.SMEs face a lack of skilled workers, notably in digital fields, and their employees Provide more basic ICT courses to SME employees and older persons, reducehave limited access to training. Managers’ awareness of the potential of digital training costs for SMEs and provide targeted adult learning programmes to SMEtechnologies is insufficient. The digital skills gap between youth and older managers.generations is the highest in the OECD.Environmental policies post-COVID-19Notwithstanding an ephemeral improvement as the COVID-19 crisis depressed Tighten caps for air pollutant emissions and strengthen vehicle emissionactivity, air pollution is a major challenge, with detrimental impacts on health and standards.well-being.Effective carbon prices are low and vary across sectors and fuels.Price CO2 emissions evenly across sectors and fuels and raise pricing accordingto a predictable schedule.OECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

131 Key policy insightsThe economy will recover gradually from the COVID-19 crisisKorea was among the first countries hit by the COVID-19 pandemic, but a swift and effective policyresponse allowed to contain the spread of the virus (Box 1.1). Korea was able to avoid the extensivelockdowns of many other countries (Figure 1.1). Along with a range of government measures to protecthouseholds and businesses, this limited the damage to the domestic economy and output is shrinking lessthan in any other OECD country.Figure 1.1. Mobility for retail and recreation has remained relatively high% deviation from baseline0-10-20-30-40-50-60-70-80Low point25 July 2020-90-100KORJPNUSACANDEUGBRFRAITANote: Mobility trends for places like restaurants, cafes, shopping centers, theme parks, museums, libraries, and movie theatres.Source: Google COVID-19 Community Mobility Report (27 July 2020).StatLink 2 https://doi.org/10.1787/888934156580Box 1.1. COVID-19 Korea’s strategy to contain the spread of the virus1Korea was one of the first countries hit by COVID-19, with its first case confirmed on 20 January.Infections surged in the Daegu region in mid-February. However, a prompt reaction and an effectivecontainment strategy allowed to limit the spread of the disease, with the number of new cases decliningsharply from early March and the number of daily deaths falling since 24 March to around zero by lateApril. As of 3 August, 14 389 cases had been confirmed, and 301 deaths. Even though numbers aredifficult to compare across countries due to differences in data collection and the varying timing of theOECD ECONOMIC SURVEYS: KOREA 2020 OECD 2020

14 epidemic, and notwithstanding the resurgence of some local clusters in recent weeks, Korea has beenamong the most successful countries in the world in limiting the spread of the disease and the numberof deaths. Moreover, this was achieved without locking down any city or region, which minimised theeconomic impact of the outbreak.The containment strategy has been based on foreign entry controls, testing, tracing and treating: Entry ban and quarantine: ban on the entry of travellers coming from the Hubei province inChina from early February 2020. As from 1 April, all persons arriving in Korea are subject to a14-day self-quarantine and, as from 11 May, all persons arriving in Korea, regardless ofnationality, undergo a mandatory COVID-19 test. Testing: innovative methods, such as drive-through and walk-through testing facilities, alongwith the rapid development of tests, allowed extensive testing. As of 3 August, close to 1.6million persons had been tested, among which 0.9% proved positive. Tracing: rigorous epidemiological investigations are conducted, using credit card transactions,CCTV recordings and GPS data on mobile phones when necessary. Anonymised informationon contacts is disclosed to the public and close contacts of positive cases are put under selfquarantine, with their health condition monitored remotely. Treatment: patients are classified according to severity and directed towards appropriatetreatment paths at hospitals for severe cases and residential treatment centres for milder cases.Health care resources and organisation were adjusted in response to the pandemic.Digital tools, notably mobile apps, artificial intelligence and devices allowing remote work and serviceprovision (including telemedicine) have played a key role in the strategy to contain the spread of COVID19 (Chapter 3).1. For further details, see Annex 1.B.Source: Ministry of Health and Welfare, Government of the Republic of Korea (2020).The government has taken appropriate and prompt measures to support the economy and alleviatehardship (Table 1.1). In the first phase of the recovery, temporary support for households and businesseswill need to be adjusted gradually according to the pace of the recovery, taking into account the relativelylow level and incomplete coverage of unemployment insurance, as well as sectoral specificities. If the crisislingers, some temporary tax and social security deferrals and reductions will need

Environmental quality remains low by OECD standards 42 References 46 Annex 1.A. Progress in other structural reform areas 49 Annex 1.B. Government measures to address the COVID-19 crisis 50 Annex 1.C. Economic co-operation with North Korea 53 References 57. FIGURES . Figure 1. GDP falls less than in the OECD 9 Figure 2.

Related Documents:

·Hyun Chang Lee, Wonkwang University, Korea ·Chul Hong Kim, Chonnam National University, Korea ·Seong Kwan Lee, Kyunghee University, Korea ·Jung Man Seo, Korea National University of Welfare, Korea ·Jun Hyeog Choi, Kimpo College, Korea ·Young Tae, Back, Kimpo College, Korea ·Kwang Hyuk Im, PaiChai University, Korea

Access Forms & Surveys The Forms & Surveys Workspace is where you create and manage forms and surveys. Each Site, Subsite, Channel and Section Workspace has a Forms & Surveys Workspace. You can access Forms & Surveys two different ways, through the Tools tab and by clicking Forms & Surveys in Common Tools. Access the Site Workspace Forms & Surveys

ISBN 978-92-64-27792-2 (PDF) ISBN 978-92-64-27793-9 (epub) Series: OECD Economic Surveys ISSN 0376-6438 (print) ISSN 1609-7513 (online) OECD Economic Surveys: Iceland ISSN 1995-3240 (print) ISSN 1999-0308 (online) The statistical data for Israel are supplied by and under the responsibility of the relevant Israeli authorities.The use

Korea University Business School Fact Sheet for Student Exchange Program Contact Mailing Address International Office Korea University Business School A304, Korea University Business School Main Building 145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea 02841 Telephone & Fax Tel: 82-2-3290-5362 Fax: 82-2-3290-5368 Websites Korea University korea.ac.kr

This Overview is based on the June 2015 OECD Economic Outlook and is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the OECD. The opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of OECD member countries. The country notes for Brazil, Chile, Colombia and Mexico are reproduced from the OECD Economic Outlook.

RIGHTS@oecd.org, OECD, 2 rue André-Pascal, 75775 Paris Cedex 16, France . Belge, aslen OECD tarafından İngilizce olarak aşağıdaki başlık altında yayınlanmıştır: OECD (2016), OECD Position Paper Regarding the Relationship between the OECD Principles of GLP and ISO/IEC 17025, Series on

OECD and non-OECD net electricity generation Trillion kilowatt-hours World electricity use by sector Quadrillion Btu Net electricity generation in non-OECD countries increases twice as fast as in the OECD with building use being a major contributor to growth in the EIA Reference Case 0 5 10 15 20 25 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 non-OECD OECD 0 .

pile resistances or pile resistances calculated from profiles of test results into characteristic resistances. Pile load capacity – calculation methods 85 Case (c) is referred to as the alternative procedure in the Note to EN 1997-1 §7.6.2.3(8), even though it is the most common method in some countries. Characteristic pile resistance from profiles of ground test results Part 2 of EN 1997 .