1522 PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 67, NO. Doppler Weather Radar

1y ago
37 Views
2 Downloads
3.46 MB
35 Pages
Last View : 11d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Mara Blakely
Transcription

1522PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 67, NO. 1 1 , NOVEMBER 1979Doppler Weather RadarRICHARD J. DOVIAK, SENIORDUSAN S. ZRNIC, SENIORDALE S. SIRMANSMEMBER, IEEE,Abstmct-TheDopplerweather radar and its signals are examinedfrom elementary considerations to show the origin and development ofusefulweather echo propertiessuch as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),range conelation, signal statistics,etc. We present a form ofthe weatherradar equation which explicitiyshows the echo power loss due to finitereceiver bandwidth and how it is related to the range weighting function. Echoes at adjacent range samples have a correlationthat dependsas well as sampleon receiver bandwidth-transmitter pulsewidth productspacing. Stochastic Bragg scatter from clouds is examined, but experimental work is required to determine if this echo power is larger thanincoherently scattered power. Section III presents ther a t i o n betweenDoppler powerspectrum and the distribution of reflectivity and velocitywithin a resolution volume.A new formulathat relates spectrum widthto the shear of radial velocities as well as turbulence, signal decorrelation from antenna rotation, and signal -pbinses is presented.The estimation of power spectral moments IS renewed and propertiesof the most commonly used algorithms are discussed. Section V highlights some of the considerations that need to be made for Dopplerradar observationofseverethunderstorms.Echo coherency is shownto limitthepulsedDopplerradar's unambiguous range andvelocityfor windmeasurements. S i d e anddualDoppler-radarteChniquesmeasurements are reviewed. Observations of thunderstorms show tornado cyclones, and clear air measurementsin the boundary layer revealturbulence and waves.NOMENCLATUREprefilter ampli'tudefilter output amplitudeof ith scattererscatterer's weight per unit volumereceiver-filter bandwidth, 6-dB width in Hzpropagation speed, 3 X lo* m * s-lrefractive index structure constantdiameter of the antenna systemseparation of radars for dual radar systemstructure functionof refractive indexnormalized range. weighting functionnormalized one-way power gain orradiationpatternmaximum measured antenna gain; gravitationalconstantweighting function of resolution volumeprefilter echo amplitude,inphase and quadraturecomponentsinphase andquadraturephase signal at filteroutputattenuation rate due to droplets (m-'); also anintegergaseous attenuation rateshear along 8 , 4J,and r directionsManuscript received November 28,1978;revised July 3 0 , 1 9 7 9 . Thiswork w a s partially supported by the FAA under Contract DOTIFA76WAI-622 (RC360205), the N W S under Contract 8AA80901. the NRCunder Contract RC370503, and the ERDA under Contract RD840520.The submission of this paper w a s encouraged after review of an advanceproposal.The authors are with the National Severe Storms Laboratory, N O M ,Norman, OK 73069.MEMBER, IEEE, ANDwavenumber 2r/Aa parameter proportional to raindrop's refractiveindexone-way propagation loss due t o scatterandabsorptionecho power loss due to finite bandwidth receivernumber of echo samples along sample-time axis;mean molecular weightinteger; also refractive indexthermal noise powernumber of scatterersecho power of resolution volume centered a t ?power delivered to the antennasystempulse repetition timepoint target echo power at the antenna portinstantaneous weather echo power (W)mean weather echo power at sample time-rangedelay rsoutput of radar receiverrange from radar 1 , 2 to grid pointrange from source to target or resolution volumelocationunambiguous range cTJ26-dB range width of resolution volumespatial covariance of A (r*)autocovariance at lag TIcorrelation of samples spaced along range timepower spectrum in frequencydomainexpected echo sample powerpower spectrum in velocity domain for resolution volume center atTnormalized power spectrumsignal-to-noise ratioair temperature (K)time lag(PRT) or sample timepulse repetitiontimeintervaldwell time to resolve target location in FM-CWradarmathematical symbolrepresenting a pulse: U 1when 0 t r ; otherwise it is zeroradial velocity field at a pointNyquist velocity A/4Tsmean Doppler velocities corrected fortarget fallspeed at data points for radars 1,2pulse pair estimate of Doppler velocitymean Doppler velocity at a grid pointmeanDopplertargetvelocities measured byradars 1, 2mean terminal velocity of drops in resolutionvolumehorizontal wind speed0018-9219/79/1100-1522 00.75 O 1979 IEEE

1523DOVIAK e t al.: DOPPLER WEATHER RADARradial component of velocity (Doppler velocity)prefilter receiver output voltageecho signal voltageweather echo voltage sample at 7 7,resolution volumeecho samples along sample-time axiscylindrical wind componentsvertical wind speedvertical velocity of tracersith scattererrange weight due t o receiver filterreflectivity factorangular coordinate; antenna rotation rate; rateof frequency change in an FM- CW radarair density; phasewind directionrange-time sample spacingrange over which samples are averagedtwo-way half-power beamwidthtarget reflectivity cross section per unit volume(m- l )angle between incident and scatterdirectionbeamwidthbetween half-power points of oneway antenna patternradar beam elevation and azimuth angles in horizon coordinates (4) 0 at true north);also angular position of scatterer relative to beam axisradar wavelength (m)structure wavelengthwavelength of wind fluctuationsperpendiculardistance from axis of cylindricalcoordinate systembackscatter cross sectionud,ur,us, ut spectrum width duetodrop fallspeeddifferences, antenna rotation, shear, and turbulencetotal spectrum width of Doppler spectrumU2mean square value of I or Quse,us@,u, spectrum widths contributed byshear along 6,9, and r , respectively0; ,u second moment of the two-way antennapattern0:second moment of the range weighting function7pulsewidth7stime delay betweentransmittedpulse and theecho sample.I. INTRODUCTIONIwADARS were developed to detectanddeterminetherange of aircraftby radio techniques, but as theybecame more powerful, their beamsmoredirective,receivers more sensitive, and transmitterscoherent,theyalsofound highly successful applicationsin mapping the earth’ssurface andatmosphere,andtheirsignals have reached outinto space to explore surface features on our planetary neighbors. Recently pulsed Doppler radartechniques have beenapplied to map severe storm reflectivity and velocity structurewith some astounding success, particularlyshowing, inrealtime,the development of incipient tornado cyclones [24],[42], [45]. Theradar beam penetratesthunderstormsandclouds to reveal the dynamical structure inside of an otherwiseunobservableevent.This inside look will helpresearchersunderstand the lifecycle and dynamics of storms. The firstdetection of storms by microwave radar was made in Englandin early 1941. An excellent historical review of the early developments in radar meteorology can be found in Atlas’ workA morerecentarticle appeared in the PROCEEDINGS[113].Because the angular resolution A6 in degrees (”) at wavelengthX is well approximated by A9 70 AID where D is the diameter of the antenna system [ 161, it is evident that remoteradio sensing, even at microwave frequencies, is characterizedby pool spatial resolution compared to opticalstandards. Oneessential distinguishing feature favoring microwaves is itsproperty to see inside rain showers and thunderstorms, day ornight. Rain andcloud doattenuate microwave signals, butslightly (for X 0.05 m) compared to the almost completeextinction of optical signals. Scattered signal strength can beof change of phaserelated to rainintensity,andtimerate(Doppler shift)is a measure of raindrop radial speed.Development of high power and high gain klystron amplifiersin the 1950’s made practical the generation of microwsves thatare phase coherent pulse to pulse,a requirement for pulsedDopplerradars if velocities of other than first time around(first trip) echoes are to be measured [ 891. Radar signals arephase coherent from pulse to pulse if the distance (or time)between wave crests of successive transmitted pulses is fixedorknown. Magnetron oscillators, phase incoherent pulse topulse, can only be used for Doppler measurements of targetsbeyond the first trip if provision is made to store phase fortime durations longer than thepulse repetition time (PRT).The first reported use of a Doppler radar to observed weatherwas made byBrantleyandBarczys in 1957 [ 191. A rapiddevelopment of Doppler techniques followed. Boyenval [ 171deduced the drop size distribution of Rayleigh scatterers fromthe Doppler spectrum while Probert-Jones and Harper[961used vertically pointed antenna and storm motion to producea vertical cross section [ 101. Zenith-pointing Doppler radarscan be used to estimate vertical air velocities as a function ofheight and time, can yield data from which one can sometimesinfer the nature of the hydrometeors (snow, rain, or hail), andin some instances, yield data for calculating hydrometeor sizedistributions [ 1 1 .]These earliest observations of radial velocities used analogspectrum analyzers or filter banks that have economical utilityfor, at most, observations in a few resolution volumes. Atlas[4] recognized the utility of scanning storms horizontally tomapradial velocities on aplan-position indicator (PPI) typedisplay and Lhermitte [ 811 accurately assessed requirementsfor the development of a viable pulsed Doppler radar. Theseearly investigators foresaw real-time severe storm and tornadowarnings from pulsed Doppler observations of storm circulations and their predictions were to be verified a few years laterby several investigating teams [24], [25], [42], [45]. Thefirst remote measurement of tornadic wind speed was accomplished in 1958bySmithandHolmes [ 1121 using a3-cmcontinuous wave (CW)Doppler radar.Real-time reflectivities displayed on PPI have been availableto radar meteorologists since the mid-1940’s. The PPI showsreflectivity distributionson conicalsurfacesastheantennabeam sweeps in azimuth at constant elevation angle. But realtime Dopplervelocitymappingwas a goal that eluded researchers until the late1960’s.Contrary to reflectivity estimation which only requires echosample averaging to reduce statistical fluctuations, mean velocity estimation requires sophisticated data processing. Probablythe long development and cost of Doppler processors (to estimate velocities simultaneously at all resolution volumes alongthe beam)layprincipallyinpreoccupation withpursuit of[ 51.

1524spectrum measurements, from which the mostinterestingmoments (meanvelocityandspectrumwidth)need to beextracted.One of the first -Doppler spectrum analyzers that could indeed generate velocity spectra in real time for each contiguousresolution volume is describedby Chimera [33],andthismachine, called a velocity indicating coherent integrator, processed with a single electronic circuit the echo signals to generatespectrumestimatessimultaneouslyat all resolutionvolumes. Another machine, called the coherent memory filter(CMF), employing the same principles was developed [ 621 forweather radar observations and used by researchers at the AirForce Cambridge Research Laboratories(AFCRL).'Thismachine produced the first real-time maps of velocity fields ona PPI [ 3 ] .In the early seventies Sirmans and Doviak [ 1081 described adevice that generates digital estimates of mean Doppler velocityof weather targets. This device, a phase change estimator, circumvented spectral calculations and digitally processes echoesin contiguous resolutioncells at the radar data rate.The need to obtain the principal moments economically andwith minimum variance, and have these in digital format (tofacilitate processing and analysis withelectronic computers)has ledresearchersto use covariance estimatetechniquespopularly known as pulse pair processing described in SectionV. Hyde and Perry reported an early version of this method[ 721, but it was first used by ionosphere investigators at Jicamarca [ 1231.Independentlyandat aboutthe same timeRummler [ 1021, [ 1031 introduced it to the engineering community. Soon the advantages of pulse pair (PP) processing became evident, and scientists at several universities and governmentlaboratories began implementing this signal processingtechnique on theDopplerweatherradar[ 831, [ 881, [91],[llOI.A single Doppler radar maps a field of radial velocities. Twosuch radars spaced apart to view the winds nearly orthogonallycan be utilized to reconstruct the two-dimensional wind fieldin the planes containing the radials [ 2 ] , [ 821. With help ofthe air mass continuityequationthethirdwind componentcan be estimated and thus the total three-dimensional windfield within the storm may be reconstructed. This is most significant as it will enable one to follow the kinematics duringbirth, growth, and dissipation of severe storms and thus perhaps understand storm initiation andevolution. It may evenprovide the answer as to why some storms reach great severitywhile others undersimilar conditions do not.Doppler radars are not limited to the study of precipitationladen air. The kinematic structure of the planetary boundarylayer (PBL) hasbeenmappedeven when particulate matterdoes not offer significant reflectivity [47] . Coherent processing can often improve the detection of weather echoes [67].Measurement at VHF [ 601 and UHF [ 9 I, [ 361 suggests heightcontinuous clear air returns to over 20 k m , and experimentswith a moderately powerful radar at S band consistently showreflectivity in the first kilometer or two [30].Although the Doppler radar became a valuable tool in meteorological research, it has not yet been transferred to routineoperational applications. As a matter of fact, several government organizations (The National Weather Service, Air WeatherService, Air Force Geophysical Laboratory, Federal AviationAdministration and the National Severe StormsLaboratory)Presently the Air Force Geophysics Laboratory.PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 67, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 1979arepresently engaged in a joint experiment, the purposeofwhich is to demonstrate the utility of the Doppler radar forsevere storm warnings and establish guidelines for the designof next generationweather radars [ 251. We anticipate thatthe new radars with Doppler capability will go in productionin the 1980's and believe that this paper will acquaint the electrical engineering community with some specifics of Dopplerweather radar, weather echo data processing, and meteorological interpretation.11. THEDOPPLERWEATHER RADAR AND ITS SIGNALSFig. 1showsinasimplified block diagram the principalcomponents of a pulsed Doppler radar. The klystronamplifier,turned on and off by the pulse modulator, transmitsa train ofhigh "peak" power microwave pulses having duration T ofabout 1 ps with spacing at the PRT designated as T,,the sampling time interval. The antenna reflector, usually a parabolaof revolution, has a tapered illuminationin order to reducesidelobe levels. Weather radarsmeasureawide range ofvolumetric target cross sections; the weakest (about lo-'' m 2 /m3) associates with scatter from the aerosol-free troposphere,the strongest with cross sections (3 X lo-' m-') of heavy rain.Needless to say, antenna sidelobes place limitationsontheweather radar's dynamic range and can lead to misinterpretation of thunderstorm heights [41] and radial velocity measurements [ 1221.The backscatter cross section o b of a water drop witha diameter Di small compared to A (Rayleigh approximation, i.e.,Di x/16) iswhere lK12 is a parameter, related to the refractive index ofthe water, that varies between 0.91 and 0.93 for wavelengthsbetween 0.01 and0.10mandis practically independent oftemperature [ 1 1, p. 381. Icespheres have ( K I 2 values ofabout 0.18 (for a density 0.91 7 g/cm3 ) which is independentof temperature as well as wavelength in the microwave region.There is an abundance of experimental and theoretical workthat relates particle cross section to its shape, size relative towavelength when Di 2 A/16, temperature, and mixture ofphases (e.g., water-coatedice spheres). Theseworks are wellreviewed by Battan [ 11 ] and Atlas [ 51.Were it not for electromagnetic energy absorption by wateror ice drops, radars with shorter wavelength radiation wouldbe much more in use because of the superior spatial resolution.Short wavelength (e.g., A 3 cm) radars suffer echo power lossthat can be 100 times larger than radars operated withA 2 10cm [ 121. Weather radar meteorologists are not only interestedin the detection of weather but also need to make quantitativemeasurement of target cross section in order to estimate rainfall rate. Thus it is important to consider losses that aregreaterthan a few tenths of a decibel.Besides attenuation due to rain and cloud droplets, there isattenuation due to energy absorbed by the atmosphere's molecular constituents, mainlywatervaporand oxygen.Thisgaseous attenuation rate kg is not negligible if accurate crosssection measurements are to be made even at 10 cm whenstorms are far away ( r 2 60 km) and beam elevation is low(eOcf) [IS].The aboveconsiderations lead to the radar equation for asingle hydrometeor having backscatter cross section ob, andx

1525DOVIAK e t al.: DOPPLER WEATHER RADAR GETFig. 1 . Simplified Doppler radar block diagram.located at angles (e, 4) from the antennaaxismixer outputs arewhere P, is the power delivered to the antenna port, g themaximum measured gain, f 2 ( 8 ,4) the normalized radiationfunction, and I exp - [J(kg k) dr] the one-way loss factordue to gaseous kg and droplet k (both cloud and precipitation)attenuation.Themeasured gain, a ratio of far-field powerdensity S(e, 4 ) to the density if power was radiated isotropically, accounts for losses associated with the antenna system(e.g., radome, waveguide, etc.).A . The Doppler-Echo Waveform (Inphase and QuadratureComponents)When there is a single discrete target, the echo signal voltageV ( t ) replicating the transmitted electricfield waveform E isproportional to it;V ( t ,r ) A exp [ j 2 n f ( t- 2 r / c ) j ] U ( t- 2r/c) (2.3)where 2r is the total path traversed by the incident and scattered waves, A the prefilter echo amplitude, c velocity of light,and U 1 when its argument is between 0 and r, otherwise itis zero.Afterdetectionandfiltering (to remove the carrierfrequency f and harmonics generated in the detectionprocess),we obtain a signalrnodulat2g signaldiffegncefrequency signal(2.4)if receiver bandwidth is sufficiently large. Thus heterodyningand detection serve only to shift the carrier frequency withoutaffecting the modulation envelope (for simplicity Fig. 1 showshomodyning wherein STALO frequency is the same as thetransmitted frequency, i.e., f a E 0). A Doppler radar usuallyhas two mixersin order t o resolve the sign of the Dopplershift; in one the STALO signal is phase shifted by 90" prior tomixing so that the detected andfiltered output of this mixer isequal to (2.4) butphase shifted by n/2. The actual signal fromthe mixer is the real part of (2.4) and for the homodyne receiver (or after a 2nd mixing step to bringfA to zero) the twothe inphase Io(t) andquadratureQo(t)componentsof themodulating signal. For convenience we ignored losses (i.e., setb 1) and used a fi factor in (2.5) so that the sum of average power in Z and Q channels equals input power A 2 / 2 averaged over a cycle of the microwave signal.If r increases with time, the phase y - 4 n r / i decreasesand the time rateof phase changeis the Doppler shfit. It is relatively easy to see from (2.6) that,for usual radarconditions (i.e., Ts and weathertargetvelocities of the order of tens of m * s - l , the change in signalphase is extremely small during the modulating envelopeU ( t - 2r/c). Thus we measuretargetphaseshift over a time,T, sz lo-' s fromecho to echo rather than duringa pulseperiod. Because of this the pulse Doppler radar behaves as aphase sampling device; samples are at t T, ( n - 1) T , wherer, is the time delay between the nth transmitted pulse and itsecho, and is denoted as range time because it is proportional torange (i.e., T, 2r/c).It is convenient to introduce another time scale, designatedsample time, wherein time is incremented in discrete T, stepsafter t 7,. Echo phase andamplitude changes are usuallyexamined in sample-timespaceatthe discrete instants (n- 1)T, for a target at range time 7., However, there have beenefforts to measure phase change within a time r in order toeliminate aliasing problems that plague observations of stormsystems 1501.The receiver's filter (Fig. 1) response is usually a monotonically decreasing function of frequency and its width B6 is bestspecified as the frequencies within which the response is largerthan one-fourth of its highest level-its 6-dB width [ 1 191.The larger is B 6 , the better is the fidelity of the echo pulseshape, but noise power increases in proportion to B 6 . Bandwidths can beadjusted to optimize signal detection performance [ 1341 , but optimization causes receiver bandwidth lossthat should be part of the weather radar equation [go]. Fur-

1526PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 67, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 1979thermore, filterresponse is associated withaspatialweightalong the range-time axis whose form is just as important tothe radar meteorologist as the antenna pattern weight is alongangulardirections.We considerthese inthe weather radarequation (Section 11-C).average larger than the first! We estimate it in the followingway.Consider adensity function A (7)that describes the scatterer’s weight per unit volume. Then analogous to (2.7)B. Weather Echo SamplesWeather echoes are composites of signals from a dense arrayof hydrometeors, each of-which can be considered a pointtarget. In this section we show the origin of the statisticalproperties of the echo samples V(T,) and instantaneous powerP(T,) and discuss incoherent, coherent, and Bragg scatter. Theecho voltage sample V(7,) is a composite EA,.exp (j477rilA) (7,)(2.7)iof discrete echoes from all the scatterers, each of which has aweight A i determined by the scatterer’s cross section o b , theradiation pattern f4(8, ), and receiver bandwidth-transmittedpulsewidth product B 6 r . These latter weighting functionsdetermine a resolution volume in space wherein targets significantly contribute to the echo sample at 7,. The echo samplepower averaged over an r - f cycle is proportional towhich is the Fourier composition of A ( ? ) along the radialdirection (for bistatic radars the composition is analyzed alongthe mirror direction). Hence the intensity of the scattered signal depends directly upon the Fourier contentof the scatterer’scross section per unit volume [ 1 18I . V, is the volume overwhich A(T‘) contributes significantly to V(T,)-e.g., the resolution volume: see Section 11-Cl.When A (7)is an random functionand can only be describedin a statistical way, it can be shown that the sample-time average of P(T,) isP(7,)J: exp (-j4np/A)R(p’) dV, I-1 I12- exp ( j 4 n r / d)V, ZA(?)(2.10a)whereR ( p ’ ) E [ A ( ; ; ) - 2 ( 7 ) 1 [A*(?’) - 2*(7‘)] (2.10b)The above is the instantaneous echo power P(7,) for one transmission and N , is the number of scatterers. If scatterers withina resolution volume move randomly a significant fraction of awavelength (e.g., A/4) between successive transmissions, eachsuccessive echosample V(7,) (spaced Ts)will be essentiallyuncorrelated. In order to make measurements of the scatterer’smean radialspeed, thetime T, between successive samplesmust be small so that contiguous echoes, at fixed delay T,, arecorrelated.The first sum in (2.8) is a constant independent of scatterer’sposition and is portional to the zeroth momentof the Dopplerspectrum, whereas the second represents the fluctuating portion of theinstantaneous power andcontainstheDopplervelocity information. Although the second sum can be significantly larger than the first (it has N,(N, - 1)) contributionscompared to N , for the first term) for some echo samples, itsaverage over many successive samples (i.e., sample-time average)approaches zero for spatially uniform distributionsbecause theto zero.sample-time average of the exponential term tendsThe first sum is then the mean power P(7,). An accurate estimate of this term is important because it relates to themeteorological estimates of liquid water in the resolution volume.1) Incoherent and Bragg Scatter: Because radar meteorologists relate echo power to the first term in (2.8), it is important to be aware of the conditions under which the sampletime average of the 2nd term is negligible. The first termrepresents incoherent scatter because its power is proportionalto the number of scatterers; the time average of the secondterm represents coherent scatter [ 1061. If scatterers are notindependent, but have their positions correlated, we then haveastatistically varying nonuniformscatterer density. Inthiscase it is possible to have the 2nd term of (2.8) give a timeis the spatial covariance of A (7) for a statistically homogeneous medium, p’ E7 - T‘, and the overbar is a sample-timeaverage. To arrive at (2.10) we assumed that the resolutionvolume size is large compared to the scales over which R ( 3 )has significant value. The first term in (2.10a) is due to fluctuations in the density of scatterers while the second term issteady and comes from the mean structure of the density correlated,R ( p ’ ) is a Dirac delta function havinga weight so that the firstterm in m a ) is equal t o incoherentscatter [ 1061. If inaddition A (7)is constant and the radial extent of resolutionvolume large compared to wavelength, steady backscatter fromthe mean structure is negligible.Scatter in anydirection comes fromFouriercomponentshaving a structure wavelength A, related to radio wavelengthA, A/2 sin (8,/2)(Bragg’s Law)(2.1 1)where 8, is the angle between the incident and scattered-wavedirections (e, 71 for monostatic radar). While it is customaryto define Bragg scatter as being from a periodic structure inthe meandensityprofile,one can definea stochastic Braggscatter if it arises from the shape of the correlation function.Thus the first term in (2.10a) contains the incoherent scatterand stochastic Bragg scatter,. Chernikov [ 3 1 ] has determinedthe relative strengths of Bragg andincoherentscatterandrelated it to the spatial covariance of cloud liquid water content. He shows conditions of side scatter where stochasticBragg scatter is much larger than incoherent scatter and hencemight be important for electromagnetic interference from rainshowers.Bragg scatter is commonly ignored in studies of precipitationbackscatter, but it would be significant if the liquid water’scovariance function indicated scale sizes less than a few meters.Although stochastic Bragg scatter may be negligible for precipitation backscatter, it is not for echoes from clear air. Indeedclear air radar echoes are a result of B r a g scatter because A ( r )

1527DOVIAK e t al.: DOPPLER WEATHER RADARhas fluctuations at scales equal to X/2 although A (F) might ber independent (i.e., nosteady echoes). Incoherentscatterfrom air molecules at microwave frequencies is usually manyorders of magnitude smaller than stochastic Bragg scatter.2 ) Signal Statistics: The Z and Q components of the echo'ssample are random variables if scatterers' positions change inan unpredictable way. Because Z, Q are comprised of a largenumber of contributions, each of which is not a significantportion of the whole, we can invoke the central limit theorem[ 94, p. 2661 to deduce thatZ and Q amplitudes have a Gaussianprobabilitydistributionwithzeromean.Thus I and Q arejointly normal [94, p. 1821 random variables andDavenportI101.02.0SOand Root [ 38, p. 1601 have shown that Z and Q from a narrowBANDWIDTH WCSEWIOTH PRODUCT B,Tband Gaussian process have zero correlations. Thus the probFig. 2 . Receiver signal power loss L , (dB) and normalized 6-dBrangeability distribution of Z and Q is-t1Prob (I,Q) -exp ( - I 2 /2u2 2TU'Q2/2u2)(2.1 2)width, 2 r , / c z , of the resolution volume versus receiver eris Gaussianandecho pulse rectangular.where u' is the mean-square value of I (equal for Q). Because shown [95] thatP(rs) (I' Q'), we see from (2.12) that instantaneouspoweris exponentially distributed and its mean value is F 2a'.C. The Weather Radar EquationWe can now relate the sample-time averaging of echo powerP ( r s ) to the radar parameters and target cross section. Thecontribution to average echo power at the filter output fromeach scatterer is1pi -A;2(2.13)f 4 @ , q5) sin 6de d# e.:8ln2(2.17)where 8 is the 3-dB width(in radians) of the one-way pattern.The range weighting function W ( r ) can be expressed as a product of a receiver loss factor 10 and a weighting function f w ( r )whose peak is normalized to unity in order to have a formof gain squared gz and patternanalogous to theproductfunction f4(e, #). That iswhich can be directly expressed in terms of radar parametersand target cross section through use of (2.2). Thus the sampletime average power at range-time delay rs iswhere W(ri) is a range weight determined by the filter bandwidth and transmitted pulsewidtt.We nowconsider anelemental volume A V thatcontainsmany scatterers. The summation of ubi over this volume normalized to A V defines the target reflectivity q(2.15)Replacing the sum by an integration because particles are assumed closely spaced compared to the scale of the weightingfunctions we have the following form for the weather radarequation(2.16)In the above it is assumed f 4 (e, d)W2( 7 ) has a scale (resolutionvolume dimensions) such that the reflectivity and attenuationcan be considered constant over the region which contributesmost to F(rs). Range ro is the distance at which W'(r) ismaximum and is assumed much larger than the extent over

1522 PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE, VOL. 67, NO. 11, NOVEMBER 1979 Doppler Weather Radar RICHARD J. DOVIAK, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE, DUSAN S. ZRNIC, SENIOR MEMBER, IEEE, AND DALE S. SIRMANS Abstmct-The Doppler weather radar and its signals are examined from elementary considerations to show the origin and development of useful weather echo properties such as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

IEEE 3 Park Avenue New York, NY 10016-5997 USA 28 December 2012 IEEE Power and Energy Society IEEE Std 81 -2012 (Revision of IEEE Std 81-1983) Authorized licensed use limited to: Australian National University. Downloaded on July 27,2018 at 14:57:43 UTC from IEEE Xplore. Restrictions apply.File Size: 2MBPage Count: 86Explore furtherIEEE 81-2012 - IEEE Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity .standards.ieee.org81-2012 - IEEE Guide for Measuring Earth Resistivity .ieeexplore.ieee.orgAn Overview Of The IEEE Standard 81 Fall-Of-Potential .www.agiusa.com(PDF) IEEE Std 80-2000 IEEE Guide for Safety in AC .www.academia.eduTesting and Evaluation of Grounding . - IEEE Web Hostingwww.ewh.ieee.orgRecommended to you b

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

us88685733 agma 1012-f 1990 us88685736 agma 2003-b 1997 us88685805 agma 6110-f 1997 us88685810 agma 9004-a 1999 us88685815 agma 900-e 1995 de88686925 tgl 18790/01 1972-09 de88686928 tgl 18791/01 1982-06 de88686929 tgl 18791/02 1983-07 us88687101 a-a-20079 2002-08-20 us88687113 a-a-50800 1981-04-23 us88687199 a-a-59173 1998-03-04 us88687222 a-a-55106 1992-07-15 us88687243 a-a-20155 1992-11-16 .