Advanced Leak Detection Technology Utilizing Satellite Imagery

1y ago
3 Views
2 Downloads
4.50 MB
25 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Nadine Tse
Transcription

Advanced Leak Detection TechnologyUtilizing Satellite Imagery

345 Team Members and Growing

Water Infrastructure Asset ManagementwaterSatellite Based Leak DetectionThis technology uses multispectral aerial imaging – taken from satellite-mounted sensors – to spot leakage inunderground distribution and transmission pipes. The raw imagery is processed by algorithms looking for aparticular spectral “signature” typical to drinking water. After calculating and adjusting any distorting factors, theinformation is integrated to Hydromax USA’s client GIS water network models and project managementdashboards. The system generates locations of water leaks which can be integrated by Hydromax into existingCMMS models or can be presented in a mobile web application displaying the leak location and size within theclients existing GIS. Hydromax USA can provide technical support to the utility’s teams for final correlation orperform the correlation on the leaks identified. The result? Leaks are found without the time and manpower ofsystem-wide field based acoustic surveys.

AND OUR PARTNER, UTILIS LTDTHE LEADER IN WATER LEAK DETECTIONSATELLITE TECHNOLOGYUTILIS SOLUTION is a cost-effective method for detectingfresh-water leaks in urban water supply systems, utilizing apatented, one-of-its-kind remote-sensing technologyproviding leakage locations with pinpoint accuracy,regardless of material or demographic density.UTILIS EXPERTS in geophysics, hydrology and water networkmanagement, have managed numerous projects across theglobe, including in the U.S., South America, Australia, the EUand Israel, and has yielded highly-successful, proven results.Since its inception, Utilis has conducted vast research,gaining expertise in analysis of urban water networks thatthrough a unique set of micro-parameters provide aremarkably accurate solution.

The Problem Addressed – Non-Revenue Water (NRW) Huge amounts of water and millions of dollars are lost Significant resources are invested to reduce NRW (people, technology, money)Leak detection methods: Acoustic Audit: Annual (multi-year) system-wide approach Inherently inefficient – survey segment by segment Dependent upon the “ear” of the technician Frequency of missed “new” leaks

The Problem Addressed – Non-Revenue Water (NRW) Huge amounts of water and millions of dollars are lost Significant resources are invested to reduce NRW (people, technology, money)Leak detection methods: Acoustic Audit: Annual (multi-year) system-wide approach Inherently inefficient – survey segment by segment Dependent upon the “ear” of the technician Frequency missed “new” leaks Loggers: fixed network or lift-and-shift Expensive hardware deployed 500 feet Limited battery life requires reinvestment

Imagine for a minute 7

Densely urbanized and tall buildings Minimum off-nadir angle: spot-light (3x1) mode 7.3 high sensitive (6x3) mode 17.5 Observation Direction: L/R

Satellite CoverageExample

Satellite CoverageExample

SAR The images depict the same location at a point in time, however when viewed throughSAR the clouds suddenly disappear. The left diagram demonstrates the different penetration of different wavelength.The X band does not penetrate the tree tops. The C band is improved but still isaffected. The L Band penetrates everything.

Solution Technology Advantages of remote sensing (L-band, 1.3 GHz) All weather capability Day and night operation Sensitivity to dielectric properties Sensitivity to man made objects Subsurface penetration Dr. Thuy Le ToanCo-Chair of BIOMASS Mission Advisory GroupCentre d'Etudes Spatiales de la BIOsphère (CESBIO)

The Secret Sauce Geo-referencing“Noise” cleaningFilteringDielectric constant – chemical signature

How We Do It?1234SatelliteSpectral nalysisWeb based appand intuitive UIUtilis takes the rawdata and prepares itfor analysis, byfiltering bouncesfrom buildings andother manmadeobjects, vegetationhydrologic objects,and more.Using Utilis advancedalgorithmic analysisto track the spectral“signature” ofdrinking water in theground.Leaks are displayedin user friendly GISreports, with 20-100meter radiusaccuracy.Raw images of thearea taken by a SARoperating in the Lband are acquired.

Accuracy and Precision We currently use images with pixel size of 6x3 meters. Available also 3x1 meters,will be tested soon Findings delivered within a 1-100 meter radius buffer. From the pilots conducted,all leaks found exactly on the address or across the street or one house away Due to the high confidence in the location precision, the confirmation process ofwhether a finding is a leak or not takes 5 minutes on non-plastic pipes. Improved accuracy with ongoing surveys refining each clients unique “spectralfingerprint”.

Web Based UI The algorithms output is intersected with local infrastructures (e.g. pipe layers).This normalized and corrected data is presented graphically over Google Maps.Additional information such as leak size is available.Alternatively, the report can be delivered in ESRI compatible format.

Delivery ModelSpectral AnalysisClient InformationManagement SystemsMapping IntegrationField CorrelationHUSA Infrastructure Dashboard

Standard Acoustic Survey

Satellite Guided Survey

Comparison of Leak YieldStandardAcoustic SurveyLeaks Foundper person / day[Satellite Traditional Acoustic] 6.1per person per dayaverage coverageper person per dayaverage coverageleaks/day/personMetallicPer mile per man per day1 leak every 2.5 – 3.7 milesPlasticlength of timeSatellite Guided Acoustic Survey 1.16Territory CoveredSurvey Cyclea4.0 Miles1.0 Milesleaks/day/personMetallicPlasticEvery1-5 yearsComparison between acoustic survey and satellite leak detection guidance was attained.20.0 Miles5.0 MilesMonthlyMonthly, quarterly, yearly options

Comparison of Leak YieldStandardAcoustic SurveyLeaks Foundper person / dayaSatellite Guided Acoustic Survey[Satellite Traditional Acoustic] 6.1 1.16leaks/day/personleaks/day/personAnnual: 1 crew200 Leaks1,220 Leaks5 Years: 1 crew1,000 Leaks6,100 LeaksComparison between acoustic survey and satellite leak detection guidance was attained.

Utilis Solution - ExamplesLive GIS (Sample)

List of Benefits The entire system is surveyed up to 12 times a year rather thanonce every 1-5 years or less. Potential leak run times are reduced from upwards of 3-5 years toa maximum of 1 month. Priority Leaks can be targeted quickly reducing potential damageand claims. NRW will reduce more quickly and stay down. Unaffected by weather, traffic, noise, time. Reduce carbon foot print. More efficient use of human and financial capital resources.

Recent News in Kansas City

Thank YouPaul SchumiNational Sales ManagerHydromax USApaul.schumi@hydromaxusa.com812-708-0590Shane MajetichManager, National Water ServicesHydromax USAshane.majetich@hydromaxusa.com813-305-6610

Per mile per man per day 1 leak every 2.5 -3.7 miles Survey Cycle length of time Monthly Monthly, quarterly, yearly options Every 1-5 years Comparison between acoustic survey and satellite leak detection guidance was attained. per person per day average coverage Metallic 4.0 Miles Plastic 1.0 Miles per person per day average coverage Metallic .

Related Documents:

LIST OF FIGURES . Number Page . 1.1 Subsea Development USA Gulf of Mexico 5 1.2(a) Liquid Only Leak 6 1.2(b) Gas Only Leak 6 2.1 Categorization of Leak Detection Technology Used 10 in this Study 2.1.1 Leak Detection by Acoustic Emission Method 12 2.1.2 Leak Detection by Sensor Tubes 14 2.1.3 Leak Detection by Fiber Optical Sensing 17 2.1.4 Leak Detection by Soil Monitoring 19

the tank itself, API standards prescribe provisions for leak prevention, leak detection, and leak containment. It is useful to distinguish between leak prevention, leak detection and leak containment to better understand the changes that have occurred in tank standards over the years. In simple terms, leak prevention is any process that is designed to deter a leak from occurring in the first .

8 Leak Detection Techniques Using Vacuum Leak Detectors 8 9 Industrial Leak Test 9. 3 Fundamentals of Leak Detection . by a special apparatus and fed to the leak detector. This procedure can be carried out using either helium, refrigerants, SF6 as the test gas. . Leak test using vacuum gauges which are sensitive to the type of gas. 6

The wide range of leak rates from Besides the determination of the total several 100 mbar x l/s to below 10-11 mbar x l/s as they occur in practi-ce necessitates the use of different leak detection principles and hence leak detectors (see figure). leak tightness, it is usually important to locate the leak, quickly and precisely,

compare its leak rates (e.g., percentage of leak-ing components to number of components mon - itored) with the facility technician's leak rates. In a study covering 17 petroleum refineries, the leak rate based on EPA monitoring was approximately 5%, while the leak rate based on industry mon-itoring was approximately 1%.6 Discrepancies

Leak detection can be subdivided into two major approaches: 1) those based on systems gathering and analyzing data concerning conditions of the fluid within the pipeline, known as internal leak detection, and 2) those leak detection efforts related to monitoring for signs of hydrocarbon outside of the

Special Water Leak Detection Devices AQUAPHON A 200 : Premium water leak detector: professional - flexible - intelligent 3,4 AQUAPHON A 150 : Handy water leak detector: compact - universal - reliable 5,6 AQUAPHON A 50 : Entry-level water leak detector: compact - on-hand - efficient 7 AquaTest T10: Robust test rod and ground mic 8

constant leak sound value of a leak and the total current sound value. In addition, the results of each measurement can be automatically stored for a comparison of leak sound levels along a series of sequential listening points (see Section 3.8 on Memory Mode, pp 18 - 19). The HL 5000 is the first leak locator that when in leak