Correlation Between Soaked & Unsoaked Cbr Values Of Different Soil Samples

1y ago
7 Views
2 Downloads
782.66 KB
5 Pages
Last View : 18d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Kairi Hasson
Transcription

2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) CORRELATION BETWEEN SOAKED & UNSOAKED CBR VALUES OF DIFFERENT SOIL SAMPLES Chandravali Pandey1, Dr. Shubha Agarwal2 1 Research Scholar, Master of Construction Technology & Management, LNCT, Bhopal 2 Professor & Head “Department of Civil Engineering” LNCT, Bhopal Abstract:- Pavements are a assortment of materials. These materials, their associated properties, and their interactions determine the properties of the resultant pavement. Thus, a good understanding of these materials, how they are characterized, and how they perform is fundamental to understanding pavement. The materials which are used in the construction of highway are requires not only a meticulous understanding of the soil and aggregate properties but also the binding materials. soil and aggregate properties affect pavement stability and durability and binding materials may be added to improve these pavement features. Soil is considered as a complex material or deposition of earth material, which includes widely different materials like boulders, sands, gravels, clays and silts. These earth material derived naturally by the mechanical and chemical disintegration of rocks or decay of vegetation, that can be excavated by manual or mechanical means depending on the availability. The supporting soil underneath pavement and constructed road is called sub grade. Undisturbed soil underneath the pavement is called natural subgrade. Compacted sub grade is the soil compacted by controlled movement of heavy compactors. The performance of pavements depends to a large extent on the strength and stiffness of the sub grade. CBR test is important method of evaluating the sub grade strength, among the various methods but quick estimation of CBR is most important for highway engineer so this study is focus on comparison of soaked and unsoaked CBR value. This Study is an attempt to understand the influence of soaking on CBR value subjected to different days of soaking and the corresponding variation in moisture content Key words:- Unsoaked & Soaked California bearing ratio, Maximum Dry Density & Optimum Moisture Content, Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, Plasticity Index. I. INTRODUCTION Damages of roads by floods are common phenomena and a huge Expenditure is required almost after each flood for convalescence of the roads. Therefore, research aiming at finding the modes of damages to roads under flood has become necessary. Several factors may appear to be responsible for such damages, which need to be confirmed by experiments. This study aimed at determining the effects of depth of submergence and duration of submergence on the sub grade strength of soil samples collected from the nearby borrow areas, where plenty amount of material is available for the construction purpose. The material which is collected for testing is different in quality and property, so that the material was separately tested in the laboratory.CBR tests were performed with different heights of submergence after normal soaking period and also after prolonged submergence. Index and identification tests were performed for classification and for determination of the suitability of the studied soils as sub grade material. Design of the various pavement layers is very much dependent on the strength of the subgrade soil over which they are going to be laid. Sub grade strength is mostly expressed in terms of CBR (California Bearing Ratio). Weaker subgrade essentially requires thicker layers whereas stronger subgrade goes well with thinner pavement layers. The pavement and the subgrade mutually must sustain the traffic volume. The Indian Road Congress (IRC) encodes the exact design strategies of the pavement layers based upon the subgrade strength which is primarily dependant on CBR value for a laboratory or field sample soaked for four days. The subgrade is always subjected to change in its moisture content due to rainfall, capillary action, overflow or rise of water table. For an engineer, it's important to understand the change of subgrade strength due to variation of moisture content. This project is an attempt to understand the influence of soaking on CBR value subjected to different days of soaking and the corresponding variation in moisture content. It is observed that the CBR decreases and the moisture content increases for high degree of soaking. II. OBJECTIVE It is common that the subgrade strength for highway pavement design is determined by CBR test measurement. This can be from the laboratory CBR test or directly from field CBR test. The correlation between the result of CBR unsoaked value and CBR soaked value is hardly found. This Thesis objective is to obtain a local correlation between the results of CBR laboratory test without soaked and CBR soaked value. The correlation is based on the comparison CBR unsoaked test results and CBR soaked value which has the same fraction of gravel, sand and clay in soil. III. SCOPE The present scope of work for this thesis is to ascertain the CBR value under different soaking time conditions and to study the influence, in the samples under varying soaking. 1. 2. 3. 4. To collect a particular soil sample and determine its basic physical property such as LL,PL,PI and grain size distribution To study the soil under modified proctor compaction and determine the MDD and OMC for the soil sample To carry out CBR Test for sample soaked in different times To study the influence of soaking on sub grade strength JETIR1906C54 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 326

2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) IV. DETAILS OF LABORATORY STUDIES California Bearing Ratio The CBR test was originally developed by O.J. Porter for the California Highway Department during the 1920s. It is a load-deformation test performed in the laboratory or the field, whose results are then used with an empirical design chart to determine the thickness of flexible pavement, base, and other layers for a given vehicle loading. Though the test originated in California, the California Department of Transportation and most other highway agencies have Since abandoned the CBR method of pavement design. In the 1940s, the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) adopted the CBR method of design for flexible airfield pavements. The thickness of different elements comprising a pavement is determined by CBR values. The CBR test is a small scale penetration test in which a cylindrical plunger of 3 in2 (5 cm in dia) cross-section is penetrated into a soil mass (i.e., sub-grade material) at the rate of 0.05 in. per minute (1.25 mm/minute). Observations are taken between the penetration resistance (called the test load) versus the penetration of plunger. The penetration resistance of the plunger into a standard sample of crushed stone for the corresponding penetration is called standard load. The California bearing ratio, abbreviated as CBR is defined as the ratio of the test load to the standard load, expressed as percentage for a given penetration of the plunger. CBR (Test load/Standard load) 100 The table gives the standard loads adopted for different penetrations for the standard material with a CBR value of 100%. Four Lot of soil samples taken as per classification. Samples are molded at its optimum moisture content to its proctor density was tested for its soaked and unsoaked CBR strength and also carried out IS classification as per IS 2720 and wet sieve analysis also carried out by four soil sample. Thus the process comprises of three parts. 1. On original sample carried out first wet sieve analysis, liquid limit and plastic limit. 2. Estimation of proctor density and optimum moisture content for each soil sample. 3. Molding the soil sample into standard moulds keeping its moisture content and dry density exactly same as its optimum moisture content and proctor density respectively. 4. Determination of CBR strength of the respective soil samples in moulds using the CBR instrument. 5. Each soil sample is tested for its soaked CBR and unsoaked CBR strength after being soaked in water for 4 days. Determination of CBR Value of Soil Subgrade Apparatus: 1. Loading machine-any compression machine can operate at constant rate of 1.25mm per minute can be used. 2. Cylindrical moulds- moulds of 150mm diameter and 175mm height provided with a collar of about 50mm length and detachable perforated base. 3. Compaction rammer, 4. Surcharge weight-annular weights each of 2.5kg and 147mm diameter. 5. IS sieve 19mm, coarse filter paper, balance etc. Fig. No. 1 (CBR Apparatus) The California Bearing Ratio(CBR) test was developed by the California Division of Highways as a method of classifying and evaluating soilsub grade and base course materials for flexible pavements. CBR is a measure of resistance of a material to penetration of standard plunger under controlled density and moisture conditions. CBR test may be conducted in remolded or undisturbed sample. Test consists of causing a cylindrical plunger of 50mm diameter to penetrate a pavement component material at 1.25mm/minute. The loads for 2.5mm and 5mm are recorded. This load is expressed as a percentage of standard load value at a respective deformation level to obtain CBR value. Sieve the sample through 19 mm IS sieve. Take 5kg of the sample of soil specimen. Add water to the soil in the quantity such that optimum moisture content or field moisture content is reached. Then soil and water are mixed thoroughly. Spacer disc is placed over the base plate at the bottom of mould and a coarse filter paper is placed over the spacer disc. The prepared soil water mix is divided into five. The mould is cleaned and oil is applied. Then fill one fifth of the mould with the prepared soil. That layer is compacted by giving 56 evenly distributed blows using a hammer of weight 4.89kg. The top layer of the compacted soil is scratched. Again second layer is filled and process is repeated. After 3rd layer, collar is also attached to the mould and process is continued. After fifth layer collar is removed and excess soil is struck off. Remove base plate and invert the mould. Then it is clamped to base plate. JETIR1906C54 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 327

2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) Surcharge weights of 2.5kg are placed on top surface of soil. Mould containing specimen is placed in position on the testing machine. The penetration plunger is brought in contact with the soil and a load of 4kg (seating load) is applied so that contact between soil and plunger is established. Then dial readings are adjusted to zero. Load is applied such that penetration rate is 1.25mm per minute. Load at penetration of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,4,5,7.5,10 and 12.5mm are noted. In table 1 represent the standard load value. TABLE 1 (STANDARD LOAD VALUE) Penetration(mm) Standard Load(kg) Unit Standard Load(kg/cm2) 2.5 1370 70 5 2055 105 7.5 2630 134 10.0 3180 162 12.5 3600 183 V. DATA ANALYSIS The values and datas collected from laboratory test of different soil samples and different conditions (Soaked & Unsoaked) with different durations are further analyzed to find out the correlation between varying Soaked & Unsoaked values of different types of sample for different time periods. Table No. 2 shows the results of different CBR values for different no. of samples for different conditions & durations. Table 2 Variation of CBR values of different samples with their respective time of soaking of sample no 1 to 4 Sample No. 1 Unsoaked CBR result 18.57 Soaked CBR result (24 Hrs.) 9.66 Soaked CBR result (48 Hrs.) 7.14 Soaked CBR result (72 Hrs.) 6.05 Soaked CBR result (96 Hrs.) 5.02 2 25.25 13.37 10.4 7.35 6.19 3 21.54 12.63 11.88 10.4 8.37 4 17.83 9.66 8.91 7.43 5.31 Fig. 2 Variation of CBR values of different samples with their respective time of soaking of sample no 1 to 4) JETIR1906C54 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 328

2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) VI. CORRELATION BETWEEN SOAKED & UNSOAKED SOIL SAMPLES Table 3 Difference Between Soaked and Unsoaked CBR % Value for Different duration Unsoaked CBR Soaked CBR Soaked CBR Soaked CBR Sample No. Value Value (24 Hrs.) Value (48 Hrs.) Value (72 Hrs.) 18.57 9.66 7.14 6.05 Sample No. 01 Soaked CBR Value (96 Hrs.) 5.02 % Variation 100% 52.01% 38.45% 32.58% 27.03% Sample No. 02 25.25 13.37 10.40 7.35 6.19 % Variation 100% 52.95% 41.19% 29.11% 24.51% Sample No. 03 21.54 12.63 11.88 10.40 8.37 % Variation 100% 58.63% 55.15% 48.28% 38.86% Sample No. 04 17.83 9.66 8.91 7.43 5.31 % Variation 100% 54.18% 49.97% 41.67% 29.78% From this results, it is observed that the CBR value of soil sample decreases from Zero hour to Ninty six hours, in sample no.1 its decreses up to 27.03% from 100%. & in Sample no. 2 its decreses up to 24.51% from 100% and then in sample No 3 its decreses up to 38.86% from 100%. And in last but not least its decreses 29.78% from 100%. VII. CONCLUSION From the results and discussions described earlier, it is observed that the CBR value of the given soil sample decreases rapidly with time of soaking up to 24 hrs. and then decreases slowly. When soil samples are taken from different points of the CBR sample and tested This Study is an attempt to understand the influence of soaking on CBR value subjected to different days of soaking and the corresponding variation in moisture content. It is observed that the CBR decreases and the moisture content increases for high degree of soaking. Unsoaked CBR let us considered to be 100% . Percentage decreases in Soaked CBR (24 hours) with respect to Unsoaked CBR can be considered to be approximately 54.44% , in Soaked CBR ( 48 hours ) can be considered to be approximately 46.19% , in Soaked CBR (72 hours ) can be considered to be approximately 37.91% and in Soaked CBR (96 hours) can be considered to be approximately 30.05% . Unsoaked CBR test is less time consuming test as compare to Soaked CBR test so these Unsoaked CBR percentage values can be used to predict the Soaked CBR values on the basis of correlation between Soaked and Unsoaked CBR values. TABLE 4 AVERAGE CBR VALUES IN PERCENTAGE WITH DIFFERENT TIME OF SOAKING. Average Unsoaked Average Soaked CBR Average Soaked CBR Average Soaked CBR Average Soaked CBR CBR Value Value (24 Hrs.) Value (48 Hrs.) Value (72 Hrs.) Value (96 Hrs.) 100% 54.44% 46.19% 37.91% 30.05% Fig. 3 Average CBR Values in Percentage with different time of soaking JETIR1906C54 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 329

2019 JETIR June 2019, Volume 6, Issue 6 www.jetir.org (ISSN-2349-5162) IX. REFRENCES [1] Arora K.R. (2009) “A Text book of Soil Mechanics” Standard Publishers Distributors. [2] Annual Book of ASTM Standards 1997, Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-Compacted Soils, ASTM D1883, West Conshohocken, PA [3] Bindra S.P. (1977) "A Text Book of Highway Engineering" Dhanpat Rai and Sons, New Delhi [4] Khanna S.K. and C.E.G. Justo (2013), “Highway Material and Pavement Testing” Nem Chand & Bros. [5] Punmia B.C. , Ashok Kumar Jain & Arun Kumar Jain (2005) “A Text Book of Soil Mechanics & Foundations”. [6] Singhal, R.P. (1967). Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Singhal Publications, India. [7] Terzaghi, K. (1943). Theoretical soil Mechanics, Chapman and Hall, London and John Wiley & Sons. [8] Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R.B. (1967). Soil Mechanics in engineering practice, Hohn Wiley & Sons. [9] Vinod, P. and Reena, C. 2008. Prediction of CBR Value of Lateritic Soils Using Liquid Limit and Gradation Characteristics Data, Highway Research Journal, IRC, 1 (1): 89-98. [10] National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP). 2001. Guide for Mechanistic and Empirical–Design for New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, Final Document, Appendix CC-1: Correlation of CBR Values with Soil Index Properties, West University Avenue Champaign, Illinois, USA. [11] “Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements for low volume of Rural road” IRC- SP-72 [12] IS 2720 Part-2 “Method of test for Soil-Determination of Moisture Content. [13] IS 2720 Part-4 “Method of test for Soil-Determination of Sieve Analysis. [14] IS 2720 Part-5 “Method of test for Soil-Determination of Liquid limit and Plastic limit” [15] IS 2720 Part –8 “Method of test for Soil-Determination of Water Content, Dry density relation using a heavy Compaction” [16] IS 2720 Part-16 “Methods of test for Soil-Laboratory determination of CBR ”Partha Chakroborty & Animesh Das “Principles of Transportation Engineering” Ministry of Road Transport and Highways Report of the Specifications for Road and Bridge Work in India. [17] IRC-SP 72-2007, "Guidelines for the Design of Flexible Pavements for Low Volume Rural Roads" IRC, New Delhi. [18] Indian Roads Congress, Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements IRC : 37-1970. JETIR1906C54 Journal of Emerging Technologies and Innovative Research (JETIR) www.jetir.org 330

CBR test is important method of evaluating the sub grade strength, among the various methods but quick estimation of CBR is most important for highway engineer so this study is focus on comparison of soaked and unsoaked CBR value. This Study is an attempt to understand the influence of soaking on CBR value subjected to different days of soaking .

Related Documents:

PSI AP Physics 1 Name_ Multiple Choice 1. Two&sound&sources&S 1∧&S p;Hz&and250&Hz.&Whenwe& esult&is:& (A) great&&&&&(C)&The&same&&&&&

Argilla Almond&David Arrivederci&ragazzi Malle&L. Artemis&Fowl ColferD. Ascoltail&mio&cuore Pitzorno&B. ASSASSINATION Sgardoli&G. Auschwitzero&il&numero&220545 AveyD. di&mare Salgari&E. Avventurain&Egitto Pederiali&G. Avventure&di&storie AA.&VV. Baby&sitter&blues Murail&Marie]Aude Bambini&di&farina FineAnna

The program, which was designed to push sales of Goodyear Aquatred tires, was targeted at sales associates and managers at 900 company-owned stores and service centers, which were divided into two equal groups of nearly identical performance. For every 12 tires they sold, one group received cash rewards and the other received

College"Physics" Student"Solutions"Manual" Chapter"6" " 50" " 728 rev s 728 rpm 1 min 60 s 2 rad 1 rev 76.2 rad s 1 rev 2 rad , π ω π " 6.2 CENTRIPETAL ACCELERATION 18." Verify&that ntrifuge&is&about 0.50&km/s,∧&Earth&in&its& orbit is&about p;linear&speed&of&a .

theJazz&Band”∧&answer& musical&questions.&Click&on&Band .

6" syl 4" syl 12" swgl @ 45 & 5' o.c. 12" swchl 6" swl r1-1 ma-d1-6a 4" syl 4" syl 2' 2' r3-5r r4-7 r&d 14.7' 13' cw open w11-15 w16-9p ma-d1-7d 12' 2' w4-3 moonwalks abb r&d r&d r&d r&d r&d r&d ret ret r&d r&d r&d r&d r&d 12' 24' r&d ma-d1-7a ma-d1-7b ret r&d r&d r5-1 r3-2 r&d r&r(b.o.) r6-1r r3-2 m4-5 m1-1 (i-195) m1-1 (i-495) m6-2l om1-1 .

varying compaction energies as well as soaked and unsoaked CBR as functions of water content for the constructed condition of the soil. The moisture-density curve and CBR strength represent the critical data necessary to enable contingency design and construction of highways and airfields.

CODE CASES: BOILERS AND PRESSURE VESSELS Supplement 4 The new andrevisedCases thatappear in thisSupplementwere approvedby theBoardon Pressure