Introduction To Matchbox Manifolds - University Of Illinois Chicago

10m ago
7 Views
1 Downloads
1.02 MB
57 Pages
Last View : 24d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Helen France
Transcription

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds Steven Hurder University of Illinois at Chicago www.math.uic.edu/ hurder . Report on works with Alex Clark and Olga Lukina Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Matchbox manifolds Let M be a continuum. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Matchbox manifolds Let M be a continuum. Suppose that each x M has an open neighborhood homeomorphic to ( 1, 1)n Tx , where Tx is a totally disconnected clopen subset of some Polish space X. arc-components are locally Euclidean. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Matchbox manifolds Let M be a continuum. Suppose that each x M has an open neighborhood homeomorphic to ( 1, 1)n Tx , where Tx is a totally disconnected clopen subset of some Polish space X. arc-components are locally Euclidean. Definition: M is an n-dimensional matchbox manifold M admits a covering by foliated coordinate charts U {ϕi : Ui [ 1, 1]n Ti i I} where Ti are is a totally disconnected clopen subsets of X. The transition functions are assumed to be C r , for 1 r , along leaves, and the derivatives depend (uniformly) continuously on the transverse parameter. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Why Matchbox Manifolds? L0 is a connected, complete Riemannian manifold, “marked” with a metric, a net, a tiling, or other local structure. “Compactify” this data by looking for a continuum M in which L0 embeds as a leaf of a “foliation” and respecting the local structure. A simple example which embeds in foliation on T2 : “Slinky model” gives even more compact model, and is continuum. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Triply periodic manifold “Compactifying” gives a foliation of a compact 4-manifold M (L S1 )/Z3 with leaf L Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Penrose tiling stripped of decorations Closure of R2 -translates of the graph below yields a continuum M foliated by action of R2 : Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Graph closures & Ghys-Kenyon examples Closure of space of subtrees of given graph, yields a Cantor set with pseudogroup action, which generates a foliated continuum M. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Definition: An n-dimensional matchbox manifold is a continuum M which is a smooth foliated space with codimension zero and leaf dimension n. Similar concept to laminations. Ti are totally disconnected Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds M is a matchbox manifold UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Definition: An n-dimensional matchbox manifold is a continuum M which is a smooth foliated space with codimension zero and leaf dimension n. Similar concept to laminations. Ti are totally disconnected M leaves of F orbits of group action Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds is a matchbox manifold UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Definition: An n-dimensional matchbox manifold is a continuum M which is a smooth foliated space with codimension zero and leaf dimension n. Similar concept to laminations. Ti are totally disconnected M leaves of F orbits of group action is a matchbox manifold A “smooth matchbox manifold” M is analogous to a compact manifold, and the pseudogroup dynamics of the foliation F on the transverse fibers Ti represents intrinsic fundamental groupoid. They appear in study of tiling spaces, leaves of foliations, graph constructions, inverse limit spaces, pseudogroup actions on totally disconnected spaces, et cetera. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Questions that we would like to understand How does a matchbox manifold M differ from an invariant set of a smooth dynamical system? of a foliation dynamical system? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Questions that we would like to understand How does a matchbox manifold M differ from an invariant set of a smooth dynamical system? of a foliation dynamical system? What is the group of homeomorphisms of M? is it “big” or “small”? is it “algebraic”? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Questions that we would like to understand How does a matchbox manifold M differ from an invariant set of a smooth dynamical system? of a foliation dynamical system? What is the group of homeomorphisms of M? is it “big” or “small”? is it “algebraic”? Can you “count” the matchbox manifolds? How do you distinguish one from another? with K-Theory invariants? using cohomology invariants? systems of approximations? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Questions that we would like to understand How does a matchbox manifold M differ from an invariant set of a smooth dynamical system? of a foliation dynamical system? What is the group of homeomorphisms of M? is it “big” or “small”? is it “algebraic”? Can you “count” the matchbox manifolds? How do you distinguish one from another? with K-Theory invariants? using cohomology invariants? systems of approximations? What classification scheme works to understand these spaces? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Questions that we would like to understand How does a matchbox manifold M differ from an invariant set of a smooth dynamical system? of a foliation dynamical system? What is the group of homeomorphisms of M? is it “big” or “small”? is it “algebraic”? Can you “count” the matchbox manifolds? How do you distinguish one from another? with K-Theory invariants? using cohomology invariants? systems of approximations? What classification scheme works to understand these spaces? Restrict attention to one of two cases: M is transitive if there exists a dense leaf. M is minimal if every leaf in M is dense. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Embeddings If f : K K is minimal action on Cantor set, then classical problem asks, when does this action arise as the restriction of a C r -diffeomorphism of f : S1 S1 ?, where r 2? How about as invariant set for some diffeomorphism on N k where k 1? Solutions to this problem for solenoids modeled on Tn , n 1 by Gambaudo, Tressier, et al in 1990’s. For n 1 by Clark & Hurder, “Embedding solenoids in foliations”, Topology Appl., 2011. The criteria for embedding depend on the degree of smoothness required. These are very special cases, and problem is wide open. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Homeomorphisms Let M be a matchbox manifold of dimension n. Lemma: A homeomorphism φ : M M0 of matchbox manifolds must map leaves to leaves is a foliated homeomorphism. Proof: Leaves of F path components of M Corollary: Homeo(M) Homeo(M, F) – all homeomorphisms are leaf preserving. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Yes! Hagopian, 1977. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Yes! Hagopian, 1977. Mislove & Rogers, 1989. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Yes! Hagopian, 1977. Mislove & Rogers, 1989. Aarts, Hagopian & Oversteegen, 1991. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Yes! Hagopian, 1977. Mislove & Rogers, 1989. Aarts, Hagopian & Oversteegen, 1991. Clark, 2002. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Yes! Hagopian, 1977. Mislove & Rogers, 1989. Aarts, Hagopian & Oversteegen, 1991. Clark, 2002. Clark & Hurder, 2010. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Bing Bling Bing Question: Let X be a homogeneous continuum, and suppose every proper subcontinuum of X is an arc. Must X then be a circle or a solenoid? Yes! Hagopian, 1977. Mislove & Rogers, 1989. Aarts, Hagopian & Oversteegen, 1991. Clark, 2002. Clark & Hurder, 2010. Proofs vary in their degrees of “abstractness”, suggesting: Bing Conjecture: Suppose that M is homogeneous continuum, and M is a matchbox manifold of dimension n 1. Then either M is homeomorphic to a compact manifold, or to a McCord solenoid. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The Theorem Theorem: [C & H, 2010] Bing Conjecture is true for all n 1. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The Theorem Theorem: [C & H, 2010] Bing Conjecture is true for all n 1. Sketch of proof of this, introduces many ideas from foliation and topological dynamical systems of matchbox manifolds – a.k.a. dynamics of pseudogroups acting on totally disconnected spaces. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The Theorem Theorem: [C & H, 2010] Bing Conjecture is true for all n 1. Sketch of proof of this, introduces many ideas from foliation and topological dynamical systems of matchbox manifolds – a.k.a. dynamics of pseudogroups acting on totally disconnected spaces. 1. detour through weak solenoids 2. dynamics of pseudogroups 3. shape and transverse foliations 4. codings and solenoids 5. automorphisms. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Weak solenoids Let B be compact, orientable manifolds of dimension n 1 for 0, with orientation-preserving covering maps p 1 p p 1 p2 p1 B B 1 · · · B1 B0 The p are the bonding maps for the weak solenoid S lim {p : B B 1 } Y B 0 Proposition: S has natural structure of a matchbox manifold, with every leaf dense. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms From Vietoris solenoids to McCord solenoids Basepoints x B with p (x ) x 1 , set G π1 (B , x ). There is a descending chain of groups and injective maps p 1 p p 1 p2 p1 G G 1 · · · G1 G0 Set q p · · · p1 : B B0 . Definition: S is a McCord solenoid for some fixed 0 0, for all 0 the image G H G 0 is a normal subgroup of G 0 . Theorem [McCord 1965] Let B0 be an oriented smooth closed manifold. Then a McCord solenoid S is an orientable, homogeneous, equicontinuous smooth matchbox manifold. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Classifying weak solenoids A weak solenoid is determined by the base manifold B0 and the tower equivalence of the descending chain o np p 1 p p2 p1 1 G 1 · · · G1 G0 P G Theorem:[Pontragin 1934; Baer 1937] For G0 Z, the homeomorphism types of McCord solenoids is uncountable. Theorem:[Kechris 2000; Thomas2001] For G0 Zk with k 2, the homeomorphism types of McCord solenoids is not classifiable, in the sense of Descriptive Set Theory. The number of such is not just huge, but indescribably large. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Pseudogroups Covering of M by foliation charts transversal T M for F Holonomy of F on T compactly generated pseudogroup GF : I relatively compact open subset T0 T meeting all leaves of F I a finite set Γ {g1 , . . . , gk } GF such that hΓi GF T0 ; I gi : D(gi ) R(gi ) is the restriction of gei GF , D(g ) D(e gi ). Dynamical properties of F formulated in terms of GF ; e.g., F has no leafwise holonomy if for g GF , x Dom(g ), g (x) x implies g V Id for some open neighborhood x V T . Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Topological dynamics Definition: M is an equicontinuous matchbox manifold if it admits some covering by foliation charts as above, such that for all 0, there exists δ 0 so that for all hI GF we have x, x 0 D(hI ) with dT (x, x 0 ) δ dT (hI (x), hI (c 0 )) Theorem: Let M be an equicontinuous matchbox manifold. Then M is minimal. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Topological dynamics Definition: M is an equicontinuous matchbox manifold if it admits some covering by foliation charts as above, such that for all 0, there exists δ 0 so that for all hI GF we have x, x 0 D(hI ) with dT (x, x 0 ) δ dT (hI (x), hI (c 0 )) Theorem: Let M be an equicontinuous matchbox manifold. Then M is minimal. Theorem: If M is a homogeneous matchbox manifold, then the pseudogroup GF is equicontinuous. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Topological dynamics of pseudogroups Can also define and study pseudogroup dynamics which are distal, expansive, proximal, etc. ADVERT: See Lectures on Foliation Dynamics: Barcelona 2010 S. H., [2011 arXiv] Dynamics of foliations, groups and pseudogroups, P. Walczak, [2004, Birkhäuser, 2004] Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Shape theory The shape of a set M B is defined by a co-final descending chain {U 1} of open neighborhoods in Banach space B, U1 U2 · · · U · · · M ; \ U M 1 Such a tower is called a shape approximation to M. Homeomorphism h : M M0 induces maps h , 0 : U U 00 of shape approximations. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Main technical result Theorem: Let M be a transitive matchbox manifold. Then M has a shape approximation such that each U admits a quotient map π : U B for 0 where B is a “branched n-manifold”, covered by a leaf of F. The system of induced maps p : B B 1 yields an inverse limit space homeomorphic to M. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Main technical result Theorem: Let M be a transitive matchbox manifold. Then M has a shape approximation such that each U admits a quotient map π : U B for 0 where B is a “branched n-manifold”, covered by a leaf of F. The system of induced maps p : B B 1 yields an inverse limit space homeomorphic to M. This study is part of sequence of papers by Clark, H. & Lukina: Voronoi tessellations for matchbox manifolds, July 2011 (arXiv). Shape of matchbox manifolds, September 2011, to appear. Classification of matchbox manifolds, 2011, to appear. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Remarks For M a tiling space on Rn , this is just the presentation of M as inverse limit in usual methods. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Remarks For M a tiling space on Rn , this is just the presentation of M as inverse limit in usual methods. For M with foliation defined by free G -action and tiling on orbits, as in Benedetti & Gambaudo, same as their result. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Remarks For M a tiling space on Rn , this is just the presentation of M as inverse limit in usual methods. For M with foliation defined by free G -action and tiling on orbits, as in Benedetti & Gambaudo, same as their result. For general M, the problem is to find good local product structures, which are stable under transverse perturbation. The leaves are not assumed to have flat structures, so this adds an extra level of difficulty, as compared to the methods in paper of Giordano, Matui, Hiroki, Putnam, & Skau: “Orbit equivalence for Cantor minimal Zd -systems”, Invent. Math. 179 (2010) Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The difficulties depends on the dimension: For n 1, it is trivial. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The difficulties depends on the dimension: For n 1, it is trivial. For n 2, given a uniformly spaced net in L0 , the volumes of triangles in the associated Delaunay triangulation in the plane are a priori bounded by the net spacing estimates. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The difficulties depends on the dimension: For n 1, it is trivial. For n 2, given a uniformly spaced net in L0 , the volumes of triangles in the associated Delaunay triangulation in the plane are a priori bounded by the net spacing estimates. For n 3, there are no a priori estimates on simplicial volumes, and the method becomes much more involved. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms The difficulties depends on the dimension: For n 1, it is trivial. For n 2, given a uniformly spaced net in L0 , the volumes of triangles in the associated Delaunay triangulation in the plane are a priori bounded by the net spacing estimates. For n 3, there are no a priori estimates on simplicial volumes, and the method becomes much more involved. In terms of leaf dimensions, we have the fundamental observation: 1 2 3 n Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Coding orbits Coding the orbits of a dynamical system is about as old an idea as exists in dynamics. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Coding orbits Coding the orbits of a dynamical system is about as old an idea as exists in dynamics. Ahlfors, Gottschalk, . Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Coding orbits Coding the orbits of a dynamical system is about as old an idea as exists in dynamics. Ahlfors, Gottschalk, . E. Thomas in 1970 paper for 1-dimensional matchbox manifolds applied these ideas to matchbox manifolds. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Theorem: [Clark & Hurder] Suppose that F is equicontinuous. Then for all 0, there is a decomposition into k disjoint clopen sets, for k 0, T T1 · · · Tk such that diam(Ti ) for all i, and the sets Ti are permuted by the action of GF . Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Theorem: [Clark & Hurder] Suppose that F is equicontinuous. Then for all 0, there is a decomposition into k disjoint clopen sets, for k 0, T T1 · · · Tk such that diam(Ti ) for all i, and the sets Ti are permuted by the action of GF . We obtain a “good coding” of the orbits of the pseudogroup GF . Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Theorem: [Clark & Hurder] Suppose that F is equicontinuous. Then for all 0, there is a decomposition into k disjoint clopen sets, for k 0, T T1 · · · Tk such that diam(Ti ) for all i, and the sets Ti are permuted by the action of GF . We obtain a “good coding” of the orbits of the pseudogroup GF . Moreover, the coding respects the inverse limit structure defined by shape approximations. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Theorem: [C & H, 2010] Let M be a equicontinuous matchbox manifold. Then M is minimal, and homeomorphic to a weak solenoid. Corollary: Let M be a equicontinuous matchbox manifold. Then M is homeomorphic to the suspension of an minimal action of a countable group on a Cantor space K. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Homogeneous matchbox manifolds Definition: A matchbox manifold M is homogeneous if the group of homeomorphisms of M acts transitively. Theorem: [C & H, 2010] Let M be a homogeneous matchbox manifold. Then M is equicontinuous, minimal, without holonomy; and M is homeomorphic to a McCord solenoid. Corollary: Let M be a homogeneous matchbox manifold. Then M is homeomorphic to the suspension of an minimal action of a countable group on a Cantor group K. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Leeuwenbrug Program Question: To what extent is an element of Homeo(M) determined by its restriction to a complete transversal T to F? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Leeuwenbrug Program Question: To what extent is an element of Homeo(M) determined by its restriction to a complete transversal T to F? Question’: Let M, M0 be matchbox manifolds of leaf dimension n, with transversals T , T 0 and associated pseudogroups GF and GF0 0 . Given a homeomorphism h : T T 0 which intertwines actions of GF and GF0 0 , when does there exists a homeomorphism H : M M0 which induces h? Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms Leeuwenbrug Program Question: To what extent is an element of Homeo(M) determined by its restriction to a complete transversal T to F? Question’: Let M, M0 be matchbox manifolds of leaf dimension n, with transversals T , T 0 and associated pseudogroups GF and GF0 0 . Given a homeomorphism h : T T 0 which intertwines actions of GF and GF0 0 , when does there exists a homeomorphism H : M M0 which induces h? Theorem: True for n 1, i.e., for oriented flows. J.M. Aarts and M. Martens, “Flows on one-dimensional spaces”, Fund. Math., 131:3958, 1988. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox Manifolds Goals Solenoids Pseudogroups Shape Coding Morphisms co-Hopfian Example of Alex Clark shows this is false for n 2! False even for solenoids built over a surface B0 of higher genus. The problem comes up from the fact that covers of the base B0 need not be homeomorphic to the base. Problem: Understand equivalence between matchbox manifolds in terms of their holonomy pseudogroups, and other invariants of their dynamics and geometry. Long way to go. Steven Hurder Introduction to Matchbox Manifolds UIC

Matchbox hisms De nition: An n-dimensional matchbox manifold is a continuum M which is a smooth foliated space with .

Related Documents:

Matchbox Oven Four Matchbox Horno Matchbox Models/Modèles/Modelos: M1313, M1718 Do not operate this equipment unless you have read and understood the contents of this manual! Failure to follow the instructions contained in this manual may result in serious injury or death. This manual contains important safety information concerning the .

Remark: the question whether a matchbox manifold can arise as a subset of a smooth foliated manifold is an open question. Remark: if Z x is a separable topological space, not necessarily totally disconnected, M is called a foliated space. Olga Lukina (University of Leicester, UK) Graph matchbox manifolds July 2th, 2012 5 / 31

Flow Manifolds Static Pressure Manifolds Liquid Level Manifolds Flow Manifolds Static Pressure Manifolds Liqu

BRUTE IImanifolds F 43 TITAN manifolds F 44-45 All manifold repair parts 46, 49-50 Series 41 manifolds F 47-48 R-134a auto manifolds 51, 58 Ammonia manifold 51, 58 Single gauge manifolds 51 BRUTE IImanifolds C 54 TITAN manifolds C 55-56 Series 41 manifolds C 57 1/4" original charging hoses 25 1/4" PLUS II Hoses, FlexFlow .

42 3 NIB Matchbox Dallas Cowboys Trucks NFL Dallas Cowboys, LTD Edition, 1994, '96, '97. 43 2 NIB Matchbox Penn State Trucks Matchbox Team Collectibles, 1991 & 1992 44 2 NIB Matchbox Dallas Cowboys Trucks 2 Adult Team Collectibles NFL Cowboys Trucks, 1999. 45 2 NIB White Rose Collectibles Collegiate Trucks 2 Penn State 2001 trucks

Matchbox 360: The Commercial Cooking Revolution Continues Matchbox 360-14 Specifications Height: 19.9" Width: 33.2" Depth: 41.3" Oven Weight: 211 lbs. Power: Single Phase 60 Hz Operating Voltage: 208V / 240V Max Current Draw: 32A/36A Plug: NEMA 6-50P Cord Length: 72" Matchbox 360-12 Specifications Height: 19.9" Width: 29.3" Depth .

2.2. Fundamental groups of surfaces 8 2.3. The mapping class group and Dehn twists 11 2.4. Classi cation of ff 11 3. Examples and constructions of 3-manifolds 12 3.1. Examples of 3-manifolds 12 3.2. Constructions of more 3-manifolds 16 4. 3-manifolds up to 1973 16 4.1. The Prime Decomposition Theorem

BSS 7230 F2 FAR 25.853 (d), App. F -Part V ABD 0031 / AITM 2.0007 BSS 7238 ABD 0031 / AITM 3.0005 BSS 7239 UL 94 / HB UL 94 / V-0 Conversion of units: 1.0 mm is equivalent to 0.03937 inches Property Measurement Method UnitValue 1.1 2.0 1.5 / 2.0 1.5 / 2.0 0.06 / 0.08 1.5 / 2.0 1.5 / 2.0 0.06 / 0.08 1.5 / 2.0 0.06 / 0.08 mm mm mm inches mm mm inches mm mm inches. EOS 2008 EOSINT P FORMIGA P .