UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)
UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository)Spicing up politics: how soft news and infotainment form political attitudesBoukes, M.Publication date2015Document VersionFinal published versionLink to publicationCitation for published version (APA):Boukes, M. (2015). Spicing up politics: how soft news and infotainment form political attitudes.General rightsIt is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s)and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an opencontent license (like Creative Commons).Disclaimer/Complaints regulationsIf you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, pleaselet the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the materialinaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letterto: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Youwill be contacted as soon as possible.UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl)Download date:28 Apr 2021
107ReferencesAarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematicframes. Political Communication, 28(2), 207-226. doi:10.1080/10584609.2011.568041Aday, S. (2010). Chasing the bad news: An analysis of 2005 Iraq and Afghanistanwar coverage on NBC and Fox News channel. Journal of Communication,60(1), 144-164. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01472.xAlbæk, E., Van Dalen, A., Jebril, N., & de Vreese, C. (2014). Political journalism incomparative perspective. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.Albarracín, D., & Vargas, P. (2010). Attitudes and persuasion: From biology tosocial responses to persuasive intent. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert T. & G.Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Volume 1 (5th ed., pp. 394-427).Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.Althaus, S. L. (2003). Collective preferences in democratic politics: Opinion surveys and the willof the people. New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.Althaus, S. L. (2012). What’s good and bad in political communication research?Normative standards for evaluating media and citizen performance. In H.A. Semetko, & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of politicalcommunication (pp. 97-112). Londen, United Kingdom: SAGE.Anderson, B. (2004). News flash: Journalism, infotainment and the bottom-line business ofbroadcast news. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.Arbuckle, J. L. (2010). IBM SPSS AMOS 19 user’s guide. Chicago (IL): AmosDevelopment Corporation.Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Cryderman, J. (2013). Communication, persuasion,and the conditioning value of selective exposure: Like minds may uniteand divide but they mostly tune out. Political Communication, 30(2), 213-231.doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.737424Arceneaux, K., Johnson, M., & Murphy, C. (2012). Polarized politicalcommunication, oppositional media hostility, and selective exposure. TheJournal of Politics, 74(01), 174-186. doi:10.1017/S002238161100123XArpan, L. M., & Nabi, R. L. (2011). Exploring anger in the hostile media process:Effects on news preferences and source evaluation. Journalism & MassCommunication Quarterly, 88(1), 5-22. doi:10.1177/107769901108800101Asch, S. E. (1951). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortionof judgments. In H. Guetzkow (Ed.), Groups, leadership, and men (pp. 222236). Pittsburgh (PA): Carnegie Press.
108Aust, C. F., & Zillmann, D. (1996). Effects of victim exemplification in televisionnews on viewer perception of social issues. Journalism & MassCommunication Quarterly, 73(4), 787-803. doi:10.1177/107769909607300403Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York (NY):Springer-Verlag.Baek, Y. M., & Wojcieszak, M. E. (2009). Don’t expect too much! Learning fromlate-night comedy and knowledge item difficulty. Communication Research,36(6), 783-809. doi:10.1177/0093650209346805Baker, C. E. (2002). Media, markets, and democracy. New York (NY): CambridgeUniversity Press.Banaji, M. R., & Heiphetz, L. (2010). Attitudes. In S. T. Fiske, D. Gilbert T. & G.Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Volume 1 (5th ed., pp. 353-393).Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons.Barker, D. C., & Lawrence, A. B. (2006). Media favoritism and presidentialnominations: Reviving the direct effects model. Political Communication,23(1), 41-59. doi:10.1080/10584600500477013Barnett, S. (1998). Dumbing down or reaching out: Is it tabloidisation wot done it?The Political Quarterly, 69(B), 75-90. doi:10.1111/1467-923X.00193Barnhurst, K. G. (1998). Politics in the fine meshes: Young citizens, power 0.1177/016344398020002003Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinctionin social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statisticalconsiderations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies, and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to theinattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96(1), 91-110.doi:10.1017/S0003055402004252Baum, M. A. (2003a). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence orabsence of evidence? Political Communication, 20(2), 173-190.doi:10.1080/10584600390211181Baum, M. A. (2003b). Soft news goes to war: Public opinion and American foreign policy inthe new media age. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.Baum, M. A. (2004). Circling the wagons: Soft news and isolationism in Americanpublic opinion. International Studies Quarterly, 48(2), 313-338.doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.00303.x
REFERENCES109Baum, M. A. (2005). Talking the vote: Why presidential candidates hit the talkshow circuit. American Journal of Political Science, 49(2), Baum, M. A., & Jamison, A. S. (2006). The Oprah effect: How soft news helpsinattentive citizens vote consistently. Journal of Politics, 68(4), rtner, J., & Morris, J. S. (2006). The Daily Show effect: Candidateevaluations, efficacy, and American youth. American Politics Research, 34(3),341-367. doi:10.1177/1532673X05280074Baym, G. (2005). The Daily Show: Discursive integration and the reinvention ,259-276.doi:10.1080/10584600591006492Baym, G. (2007). Crafting new communicative models in the televisual sphere:Political interviews on The Daily Show. The Communication Review, 10(2),93-115. doi:10.1080/10714420701350379Baym, G. (2010). From Cronkite to Colbert: The evolution of broadcast news. Boulder(CO): Paradigm Publishers.Baym, G. (2013). Political media as discursive modes: A comparative analysis ofinterviews with Ron Paul from Meet The Press, Tonight, The Daily Show,and Hannity. International Journal of Communication, 7(Breaking Boundaries),489-507. Retrieved from 64Baym, G., & Jones, J. P. (2012). News parody in global perspective: Politics,power, and resistance. Popular Communication, 10(1-2), 2-13.doi:10.1080/15405702.2012.638566Baym, G., & Shah, C. (2011). Circulating struggle. Information, Communication &Society, 14(7), 1017-1038. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2011.554573Becker, A. B. (2014). Humiliate my enemies or mock my friends? Applyingdisposition theory of humor to the study of political parody appreciationand attitudes toward candidates. Human Communication Research, 40(2), 137160. doi:10.1111/hcre.12022Becker, A. B., & Waisanen, D. J. (2013). From funny features to entertainingeffects: Connecting approaches to communication research on 3.doi:10.1080/15358593.2013.826816
110Bennett, W. L. (2007). Relief in hard times: A defense of Jon Stewart’s comedy inan age of cynicism. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 24(3), 278-283.doi:10.1080/07393180701521072Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changingfoundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4),707-731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.xBennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2010). The shifting foundations of politicalcommunication: Responding to a defense of the media effects .1111/j.14602466.2009.01471.xBerelson, B. (1952). Democratic theory and public opinion. The Public OpinionQuarterly, 16(3), 313-330. doi:10.1086/266397Berger, A. A. (1976). Anatomy of the joke. Journal of Communication, 26(3), nsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., & Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labormarkets for experimental research: Amazon.com's Mechanical Turk.Political Analysis, 20(3), 351-368. doi:10.1093/pan/mpr057Betancourt, H. (1990). An attribution-empathy model of helping (3),573-591.doi:10.1177/0146167290163015Bird, S. E. (1998). News we can use: An audience perspective on the tabloidisationof news in the United States. Javnost-the Public, 5(3), 33-49. Retrieved Blanton, H., Strauts, E., & Perez, M. (2012). Partisan identification as a predictorof cortisol response to election news. Political Communication, 29(4), 447460. doi:10.1080/10584609.2012.736239Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication:Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209-230.doi:10.1080/105846099198596Boczkowski, P. J. (2009). Rethinking hard and soft news production: Fromcommon ground to divergent paths. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 98-116.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01406.xBolton, G. (2010). Testing models and internalizing context: A comment on“Theory and experiment: What are the questions?” Journal of EconomicBehavior & Organization, 73(1), 16-20. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2009.11.002
REFERENCES111Borden, S. L., & Tew, C. (2007). The role of journalist and the performance ofjournalism: Ethical lessons from “fake” news (seriously). Journal of MassMedia Ethics, 22(4), 300-314. doi:10.1080/08900520701583586Bosch, B. (2013). Beyond vox pop: The role of news sourcing and political beliefsin exemplification effects. Mass Communication and Society, 17(2), 217-235.doi:10.1080/15205436.2013.779718Boukes, M., & Boomgaarden, H. G. (2014). Soft news with hard consequences?Introducing a nuanced measure of soft versus hard news exposure and itsrelationship with political cynicism. Communication Research. Advance onlinepublication. doi:10.1177/0093650214537520Brants, K. (1998). Who's afraid of infotainment? European Journal of Communication,13(3), 315-335. doi:10.1177/0267323198013003002Brants, K., & Neijens, P. (1998). The infotainment of politics. PoliticalCommunication, 15(2), 149-164. doi:10.1080/10584609809342363Brants, K., & Van Praag, P. (2006). Signs of media logic: Half a century of politicalcommunication in the Netherlands. Javnost-the Public, 13(1), 25-40.Retrieved from Brewer, P. R., Young, D. G., & Morreale, M. (2013). The impact of real newsabout “fake news”: Intertextual processes and political satire. InternationalJournal of Public Opinion Research, 25(3), 323-343. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edt015Brosius, H., & Bathelt, A. (1994). The utility of exemplars in 1),48-78.doi:10.1177/009365094021001004Buckingham, D. (1997). News media, political socialization and popularcitizenship: Towards a new agenda. Critical Studies in Mass Communication,14(4), 344-366. doi:10.1080/15295039709367023Bucy, E. P., & Tao, C. (2007). The mediated moderation model of interactivity.Media Psychology, 9(3), 647-672. doi:10.1080/15213260701283269Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism?(Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,98(4), 550-558. doi:10.1037/a0018933Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs forresearch. Chicago (IL): Rand McNally College.Chaffee, S. H., & Schleuder, J. (1986). Measurement and effects of attention tomedia news. Human Communication Research, 13(1), 76-107.doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.1986.tb00096.x
112Chaffee, S. H., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G. (1994). Political knowledge and thecampaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21(3), 305-324.doi:10.1177/009365094021003004Chang, C. (2001). The impacts of emotion elicited by print political advertising doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0302 01Chia, S. C. (2006). How peers mediate media influence on adolescents? Sexualattitudes and sexual behavior. Journal of Communication, 56(3), 585-606.doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00302.xChoi, J., Yang, M., & Chang, J. J. (2009). Elaboration of the hostile mediaphenomenon: The roles of involvement, media skepticism, congruency ofperceived media influence, and perceived opinion climate. CommunicationResearch, 36(1), 54-75. doi:10.1177/0093650208326462Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Review of PoliticalScience, 10(1), 103-126. doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinionformation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication,57(1), 99-118. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.xCoe, K., Tewksbury, D., Bond, B. J., Drogos, K. L., Porter, R. W., Yahn, A., &Zhang, Y. (2008). Hostile news: Partisan use and perceptions of cablenews programming. Journal of Communication, 58(2), ta, L. (2009). Political satire and postmodern irony in the age of StephenColbert and Jon Stewart. The Journal of Popular Culture, 42(5), n, J. (2011). Surveying scholarship on The Daily Show and the ColbertReport. In A. Amarasingam (Ed.), The Stewart/Colbert effect: Essays on the realimpacts of fake news (pp. 9-33). Jefferson (NC): McFarland.Converse, P. E. (1964). The nature of belief systems in mass publics. In D. Apter(Ed.), Ideology and discontent (pp. 206-262). New York (NY): Free Press.Conway, M., Grabe, M. E., & Grieves, K. (2007). Villains, victims, and the virtuousin Bill O'Reilly’s "No-Spin Zone": Revisiting world war 3.doi:10.1080/14616700601148820
REFERENCES113Costera Meijer, I. (2003). What is quality television news? A plea for extending theprofessional repertoire of newsmakers. Journalism Studies, 4(1), 15-29.doi:10.1080/14616700306496Coulson, S., & Williams, R. F. (2005). Hemispheric asymmetries and oi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.015Coyne, S. M., Padilla-Walker, L. M., & Howard, E. (2013). Emerging in a digitalworld: A decade review of media use, effects, and gratifications .doi:10.1177/2167696813479782Crites, S. L., Fabrigar, L. R., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Measuring the affective andcognitive properties of attitudes: Conceptual and methodological ),619-634.doi:10.1177/0146167294206001Curran, J. (2010). Democratic value of entertainment: A reappraisal. Media &Jornalismo, 17(9), 69-85. Retrieved from http://www.cimj.org/images/stories/docs cimj/17 5-artigo.pdfCurran, J., Douglas, A., & Whannel, G. (1980). The political economy of thehuman interest story. In A. Smith (Ed.), Newspapers and democracy:International essays on a changing medium (pp. 288-347). Cambridge (MA): TheMIT Press.Dahlgren, P. (2005). The internet, public spheres, and political communication:Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication, 22(2), 147-162.doi:10.1080/10584600590933160Dalton, R. J. (2000). Citizen attitudes and political behavior. Comparative PoliticalStudies, 33(6-7), 912-940. doi:10.1177/001041400003300609Daschmann, G., & Brosius, H. (1999). Can a single incident create an issue?Exemplars in German television magazine shows. Journalism & MassCommunication Quarterly, 76(1), 35-51. doi:10.1177/107769909907600104Davison, W. P. (1983). The third-person effect in communication. The PublicOpinion Quarterly, 47(1), 1-15. doi:10.1086/268763De Vreese, C. H. (2002). Framing Europe: Television news and European integration.Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Aksant Academic.De Vreese, C. H. (2005). News framing: Theory and typology. Information DesignJournal Document Design, 13(1), 48-59. doi:10.1075/idjdd.13.1.06vre
114De Vreese, C. H., & Klausch, T. (2011). The salience of frames and their effects onthe support for CFSP and supranational policy allocation. In K.Oppermann, & H. Viehrig (Eds.), Issue salience in international politics (pp.118-136). Abingdon, United Kingdom: Routledge.DellaVigna, S., & Kaplan, E. (2007). The Fox News effect: Media bias and 1234.doi:10.1162/qjec.122.3.1187Delli Carpini, M. X. (2012). Entertainment media and the political engagement ofcitizens. In H. A. Semetko, & M. Scammell (Eds.), The SAGE handbook ofpolitical communication (pp. 9-21). London, United Kingdom: SAGE.Delli Carpini, M. X. (2013). Can we bridge the quantitative versus qualitative dividethrough the study of entertainment and politics? International Journal ofCommunication, 7(Breaking Boundaries), 531-551. Retrieved fromhttp://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/ article/view/1972Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and whyit matters. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press.Delli Carpini, M. X., & Williams, B. A. (2001). Let us infotain you: Politics in thenew media age. In W. L. Bennett, & R. M. Entman (Eds.), Mediated politics:Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 160-181). New York (NY):Cambridge University Press.DeLuca, K. M., & Peeples, J. (2002). From public sphere to public screen:Democracy, activism, and the "violence" of Seattle. Critical Studies in MediaCommunication, 19(2), 125-151. doi:10.1080/07393180216559Diddi, A., & LaRose, R. (2006). Getting hooked on news: Uses and gratificationsand the formation of news habits among college students in an Internetenvironment. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50(2), 193-210.doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5002 2Downs, A. (1957). An economic theory of democracy. New York (NY): Harper Row.Druckman, J. N., & Parkin, M. (2005). The impact of media bias: How editorialslant affects voters. Journal of Politics, 67(4), 1030-1049. doi:10.1111/j.14682508.2005.00349.xDruckman, J. N., & Kam, C. D. (2011). Students as experimental participants: Adefense of the "narrow data base". In J. N. Druckman, D. P. Green, J. H.Kuklinski & A. Lupia (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of experimental political science(pp. 41-57). New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
REFERENCES115Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando (FL): HarcourtBrace Jovanovich.Eisend, M. (2009). A meta-analysis of humor in advertising. Journal of the Academy ofMarketing Science, 37(2), 191-203. doi:10.1007/s11747-008-0096-yEllithorpe, M. E., Holbert, R. L., & Palmer-Wackerly, A. (2013). Procrastinationand the shifting political media environment: An experimental study ofmedia choice affecting a democratic outcome. Communication Studies, 64(5),561-578. doi:10.1080/10510974.2013.832692Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured .1111/j.14602466.1993.tb01304.xErisen, C., Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2014). Affective contagion in effortfulpolitical thinking. Political Psychology, 35(2), 187-206. doi:10.1111/j.14679221.2012.00937.xEsser, F. (1999). 'Tabloidization' of news: A comparative analysis of AngloAmerican and Germ
107 References Aarøe, L. (2011). Investigating frame strength: The case of episodic and thematic frames.
The love dare challenge day 1. The love dare challenge reviews. The love dare daily challenges. The love dare challenge printable. The fireproof love dare challenge. The love dare challenge app. I believe the only thing you need to have to know true love is true love. SearchReSearchDaniel M. Surprisingly, I am not in a failing marriage, but I .
DARE!! Instruments DARE!! EMC & RF Measurement equipment Vijzelmolenlaan 3 3447 GX Woerden The Netherlands Tel. 31 348 416 592 www.dare.eu instruments@dare.eu DARE!! Products B.V. CoC number: 30138672 VAT number: NL8056.13.390.B01 . The CI test Bundle is a turn-key solution for
DARE Digital Storytelling Handbook for Empowerment 5 DARE Project The DARE Digital Storytelling Handbook was developed as part of DARE: Disable the Barriers Project. It includes accessible multimedia resources to accommodate the needs of people with and without impairments. The aims of the Digital Storytelling Handbook and DARE Project are to:
solaris repository description Local\ copy\ of\ the\ Oracle\ Solaris\ 11.1\ repository solaris repository legal-uris solaris repository mirrors solaris repository name Oracle\ Solaris\ 11.1\ Package\ Repository solaris repository origins solaris repository
* 2. One to three Dare ground rod clamps 3. Dare insulated underground & hook-up wire 4. One Dare cut-off switch, if desired 5. Dare line clamps/split bolts/fence taps 6. Surge Protector * The pulse energy of the DE 20, DE 60, or DE 80 is low enough where one ground rod may be all that is needed. INSTALLING THE GROUND SYSTEM
Creating, Restoring, and Configuring the Informatica Repository 78 Starting the Informatica Repository Server 78 Creating or Restoring the Informatica Repository 79 Dropping the Informatica Repository (Optional) 81 Registering the Informatica Repository Server in Repository Server Administration Console 81 Pointing to the Informatica Repository 82
Introduction Basic Git Branching in Git GitHub Hands-on practice Git: General concepts (II/II) I clone: Clone remote repository (and its full history) to your computer I stage: Place a le in the staging area I commit: Place a le in the git directory (repository) I push: Update remote repository using local repository I pull: Update local repository using remote repository
Mar 01, 2020 · dare. I did apologize years later. But the point is that there is power in a dare. Most of us are have a daring spirit. We almost always want to rise to the challenge of something put before us, especially if done by a peer, a teacher or an employer. In general, we like to be dared. So, I want to dare you to something. This Lent I dare you to .
