2019 North American Remote Cardiac Monitoring

2y ago
17 Views
3 Downloads
855.91 KB
12 Pages
Last View : 8d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Roy Essex
Transcription

2019 North American Remote Cardiac MonitoringTechnology Leadership Award2019NORTH AMERICANREMOTE CARDIAC MONITORINGTECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP AWARD2018

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHContentsBackground and Company Performance . 3Industry Challenges . 3Technology Leverage and Business Impact . 4Conclusion. 6Significance of Technology Leadership . 7Understanding Technology Leadership . 7Key Benchmarking Criteria . 8Best Practices Award Analysis for InfoBionic . 8Decision Support Scorecard . 8Technology Leverage . 9Business Impact . 9Decision Support Matrix . 10Best Practices Recognition: 10 Steps to Researching, Identifying, and Recognizing BestPractices . 11The Intersection between 360-Degree Research and Best Practices Awards . 12Research Methodology . 12About Frost & Sullivan . 12 Frost & Sullivan 20192“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHBackground and Company PerformanceIndustry ChallengesAccording to US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 11.5% of Americanadults have been diagnosed with a heart disease. As a family, heart disease results in 197deaths per 100,000 persons, making it the leading cause of death in the country. A keymember of this family is cardiac arrhythmia, which is characterized by irregular electricalactivity in the heart that causes it to beat too rapidly, too slowly, or erratically. Anunusually fast rhythm (above 100 beats per minute) is called tachycardia, and a heartrate that is too slow (less than 60 beats per minute) is called bradycardia. Arrhythmiaspose the risk of developing into serious conditions such as stroke, heart failure, or cardiacarrest. Clinical studies, including one published recently by Alan Go et al in the Journal ofthe American Medical Association (JAMA) Cardiology, advocate the practice of continuouscardiac monitoring as a means to detect arrhythmia early on and to prevent risks of strokeand heart failure.In this context, the cardiac monitoring industry offers several types of monitors thatenable remote and continuous monitoring through electrocardiography (ECG). The first isthe widely adopted Holter monitor, a battery-operated, portable device that a patientwears to record the heart’s electrical activity for up to two weeks to screen for cardiacevents. The challenge with these traditionally used ambulatory heart monitors is that theyare not capable of real-time analysis; the data is reviewed days or weeks after it has edtobecumbersomeanduncomfortable for the patient due to the presence of patches and wires. A second type ofcardiac monitor, an event monitor, provides a more timely analysis of cardiac data, butthe patient initiates recording when experiencing symptoms; therefore, the recording isnot continuous. Moreover, the recorder constantly overwrites previous data, which meansretaining heart data over time becomes a major issue. Finally, mobile cardiac telemetry(MCT) units provide continuous measurements of cardiac activity and include an automaticarrhythmia detector. But the challenge with this device lies in automatic ECG analysissince this requires vast computational resources and electrical power.The key takeaway from reviewing the solutions available in the market is that theyprovide a great value addition. At the same time, though, the dependence on one devicealone is likely to result in incomplete cardiac monitoring. Another challenge in the remotemonitoring industry is siloed information that directly affects timely diagnosis andtreatment, and thus poses a potential danger for patients with a history of heart disease.The need of the hour is a cardiac monitor that would integrate the positive attributes ofthe various form factors, while also keeping in mind evolving healthcare trends andpatients’ increasing comfort with the digital space. Such a monitor would put the patientat the center of the digital ecosystem, non-intrusively recording, storing, and analyzingcardiac activity—virtually bringing the patient closer to the physician. Frost & Sullivan 20193“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHTechnology Leverage and Business ImpactInfoBionic, a digital health company based in Boston, designed and developed MoMe Kardia, introduced as the only full disclosure transmitter in the market. As an answer tothe key unmet needs of the cardiac monitoring market, MoMe Kardia captures clinicalgrade ECG, providing near real-time and continuous cardiac monitoring.Commitment to CreativityThe MoMe Kardia system seamlessly integrates the three monitoring modes—Holter,cardiac event monitoring, and MCT—into a single, non-invasive cardiac monitor. Built intoa lightweight wearable form factor, MoMe Kardia allows physicians to gather cardiac dataduring the monitoring period. Physicians can remotely switch between the three diagnosticmodes, empowering them to gather data needed to make an effective diagnosis.Unlike other products that usually have a sensor unit to acquire ECG data and another unitto transmit the captured data to the monitoring center, MoMe Kardia allows both tasks tobe accomplished via a single device. Frost & Sullivan believes that a key feature of theproduct is that it does not require patient intervention to capture or record data;therefore, the transfer from ECG recording to storage is continuous. The device is sleekand lightweight, allowing patients to go about their daily routine without interference fromthe monitor. The comfort and convenience that the device offers translates into usageover long periods of time.At a time when consumer electronic products, renowned for elegant product design, areoffering health monitoring, it becomes incumbent upon clinical-oriented diagnostic devicesto also focus on product design. Traditionally, this aspect of product development hasbeen overlooked, placing utility over comfort. Frost & Sullivan commends InfoBionic for aproduct design that has focused on patient comfort just as much as on physicianexpediency.Commitment to InnovationA persistent industry challenge has been data storage, management, and analysis. MoMeKardia confronts this challenge head-on with innovative product features supplementing anovel business model. On the product side, the monitoring unit has enough power tocontinuously stream to the cloud. It delivers data directly from the cloud to the physician’ssmartphone via a secure app that is Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act(HIPAA) compliant.A few other product features truly showcase the value offering: MoMe Kardia enables precision analysis by verifying detected events through aproprietary algorithm to reduce false positives. The physician can conveniently gain access to monitoring data any time of the day,and remotely switch between modes as needed. The physician has access to all data at any given point of time and uniquely has fullownership of the entire service. Full data disclosure sets MoMe Kardia apart from Frost & Sullivan 20194“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHmarket competition; all other devices share only event triggers with the patient. Fulldata has to be requested, and even then may take time to receive. By givingphysicians complete access to patients’ health data, InfoBionic empowers them withtrue 24x7 monitoring and faster intervention.Technology Incubation and Commercialization SuccessIn early 2016, InfoBionic received clearance from the US Food and Drug Administration tomarket the MoMe Kardia system as an aid to physicians in their diagnosis of cardiacarrhythmias. Within two years, the device has gained considerable traction in the market:it has been used to diagnose and/or monitor more than 40,000 patients. InfoBionicwitnessed a nearly 600% growth in new and recurring customers from 2016 to 2017 andcontinues this pace throughout 2018.MoMe Kardia is positioned as the only deep learning software-as-a-service cardiacmonitor. This makes cardiac care intelligent, scalable, and closely aligned with the growingcardiac monitoring needs. InfoBionic sells the devices to physicians for a one-time fee,and thereon, a monthly subscription fee is charged for the use of software that runs thedata. The physician is then able to prescribe a single device to multiple patients, changingbetween different modes. Under InfoBionic’s business model, a physician is able to use asingle device for as many tests as needed, at a single monthly fee. If the same had beendone using the three traditional devices, the costs would have been unpredictable anddependent on the scale of monitoring required, varying between 100 and 1,000 permonth. Instead, the 3-in-1 MoMe Kardia device greatly reduces infrastructure costs andallows physicians to scale their monitoring lar and endovascular atwithdevelopsThis partnership gives the novel productmarketing might and a market foothold that is needed to take on some of the larger andwell-established cardiac diagnostic companies.Customer Acquisition and Growth PotentialThe MoMe Kardia system not only provides near real-time heart activity data, but alsosolves the problem of storing and retaining data. Moreover, the system’s remote transitioncapability can eliminate the need for patient to visit a hospital; the physician can decidethe treatment based on the arrhythmia detection relevance. This effectively replicates thepractice of non-emergency in-hospital monitoring, making patients unencumbered whilethey are studied in their natural state of activity.In the wake of increasing market adoption and successful product acceptance, InfoBionicraised 50 million in a new round of funding, bringing its total funding to 75 million.Frost & Sullivan believes that this funding round, viewed together with the BIOTRONIKpartnership, significantly boosts the company’s growth potential.InfoBionic is now launching nationally withhundreds of representatives through itsstrategic partner. This is a part of the plan to increase its market presence from about 5 Frost & Sullivan 20195“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHstates at the beginning of 2018 to nationwide coverage by year end. Over the next 18 to 24months, InfoBionic plans to expand into international territories, beginning with selectmarkets in Europe and promising countries in Asia. With strong intentions for aninternational presence, InfoBionic’s growth worldwide is imminent.ConclusionInfoBionic’s MoMe Kardia system addresses the key issues and barriers in the remotecardiac monitoring industry. By leveraging technology effectively, InfoBionic has devised asystem that caters to cardiac arrhythmia patients and their physicians by convenientlymonitoring and diagnosing cardiac activity in as close to real time as possible. Patients andphysicians are now equipped with greater control over heart monitoring for improvedoutcomes.For its commendable technology leverage and remarkable overall performance, InfoBionichas earned Frost & Sullivan’s 2018 Technology Leadership Award. Frost & Sullivan 20196“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHSignificance of Technology LeadershipTechnology-rich companies with strong commercialization strategies benefit from theincreased demand for high-quality, technologically-innovative products. Those productshelp shape the brand, leading to a strong, differentiated market position.Understanding Technology LeadershipTechnology Leadership recognizes companies that lead the development and successfulintroduction of high-tech solutions to customers’ most pressing needs, altering theindustry or business landscape in the process. These companies shape the future oftechnology and its uses. Ultimately, success is measured by the degree to which atechnology is leveraged and the impact that technology has on growing the business. Frost & Sullivan 20197“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHKey Benchmarking CriteriaFor the Technology Leadership Award, Frost & Sullivan analysts independently evaluatedtwo key factors—Technology Leverage and Business Impact—according to the criteriaidentified below.Technology LeverageCriterion 1: Commitment to InnovationCriterion 2: Commitment to CreativityCriterion 3: Technology IncubationCriterion 4: Commercialization SuccessCriterion 5: Application DiversityBusiness ImpactCriterion 1: Financial PerformanceCriterion 2: Customer AcquisitionCriterion 3: Operational EfficiencyCriterion 4: Growth PotentialCriterion 5: Human CapitalBest Practices Award Analysis for InfoBionicDecision Support ScorecardTo support its evaluation of best practices across multiple business performancecategories, Frost & Sullivan employs a customized Decision Support Scorecard. This toolallows our research and consulting teams to objectively analyze performance, according tothe key benchmarking criteria listed in the previous section, and to assign ratings on thatbasis. The tool follows a 10-point scale that allows for nuances in performance evaluation.Ratings guidelines are illustrated below.RATINGS GUIDELINESThe Decision Support Scorecard is organized by Technology Leverage and Business Impact(i.e., These are the overarching categories for all 10 benchmarking criteria; the definitionsfor each criterion are provided beneath the scorecard.). The research team confirms theveracity of this weighted scorecard through sensitivity analysis, which confirms that smallchanges to the ratings for a specific criterion do not lead to a significant change in theoverall relative rankings of the companies. Frost & Sullivan 20198“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHThe results of this analysis are shown below. To remain unbiased and to protect theinterests of all organizations reviewed, we have chosen to refer to the other keyparticipants as Competitor 2 and Competitor 3.Measurement of 1–10 (1 poor; 10 excellent)TechnologyLeverageTechnology 9.59.5Competitor 2877.5Competitor 36.57.57Technology LeverageCriterion 1: Commitment to InnovationRequirement: Conscious, ongoing development of an organization’s culture that supportsthe pursuit of groundbreaking ideas through the leverage of technologyCriterion 2: Commitment to CreativityRequirement: Employees rewarded for pushing the limits of form and function, byintegrating the latest technologies to enhance productsCriterion 3: Technology teinvestmenttoincubatenewtechnologies developed internally or through strategic partnershipsCriterion 4: Commercialization SuccessRequirement: A proven track record of successfully commercializing new technologies, byenabling new products and/or through licensing strategiesCriterion 5: Application DiversityRequirement: The development of technologies that serve multiple products, multipleapplications, and multiple user environmentsBusiness ImpactCriterion 1: Financial PerformanceRequirement: Overall financial performance is strong in terms of revenues, revenuegrowth, operating margin, and other key financial metrics.Criterion 2: Customer AcquisitionRequirement: Overall technology strength enables acquisition of new customers, even asit enhances retention of current customers.Criterion 3: Operational EfficiencyRequirement: Staff is able to perform assigned tasks productively, quickly, and to a highquality standard. Frost & Sullivan 20199“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHCriterion 4: Growth PotentialRequirements: Technology focus strengthens brand, reinforces customer loyalty, andenhances growth potential.Criterion 5: Human CapitalRequirement: Company culture is characterized by a strong commitment to customerimpact through technology leverage, which in turn enhances employee morale andretention,Decision Support MatrixOnce all companies have been evaluated according to the Decision Support Scorecard,analysts then position the candidates on the matrix shown below, enabling them tovisualize which companies are truly breakthrough and which ones are not yet operating atbest-in-class levels.HighInfoBionicBusiness ImpactCompetitor 3Competitor 2LowLow Frost & Sullivan 2019Technology Leverage10High“We Accelerate Growth”

BEST PRACTICES RESEARCHBest Practices Recognition: 10 Steps to Researching,Identifying, and Recognizing Best PracticesFrost & Sullivan Awards follow a 10-step process to evaluate Award candidates and assesstheir fit with select best practice criteria. The reputation and integrity of the Awards arebased on close adherence to this process.STEPOBJECTIVEKEY ACTIVITIESOUTPUTIdentify Award recipientcandidates from around theglobe Conduct in-depth industryresearch Identify emerging sectors Scan multiple geographiesPipeline of candidates whopotentially meet all bestpractice criteriaPerform comprehensive,360-degree research on allcandidates in the pipeline Interview thought leadersand industry practitioners Assess candidates’ fit withbest-practice criteria Rank all candidatesMatrix positioning of allcandidates’ performancerelative to one another1Monitor,target, eadership inbestpracticesPerform in-depthexamination of all candidates Confirm best-practice criteria Examine eligibility of allcandidates Identify any information gapsDetailed profiles of allranked candidates4InitiateresearchdirectorreviewConduct an unbiasedevaluation of all candidateprofiles Brainstorm ranking options Invite multiple perspectiveson candidates’ performance Update candidate profilesFinal prioritization of alleligible candidates andcompanion best-practicepositioning paper5Assemblepanel ofindustryexpertsPresent findings to an expertpanel of industry thoughtleaders Share findings Strengthen cases forcandidate eligibility Prioritize candidatesRefined list of prioritizedAward candidates6ConductglobalindustryreviewBuild consensus on Awardcandidates’ eligibility Hold global team meeting toreview all candidates Pressure-test fit with criteria Confirm inclusion of alleligible candidatesFinal list of eligible Awardcandidates, representingsuccess stories worldwide7Performquality checkDevelop official Awardconsideration materials Perform final performancebenchmarking activities Write nominations Perform quality reviewHigh-quality, accurate, andcreative presentation ofnominees’ successes8Reconnectwith panel ofindustryexpertsFinalize the selection of thebest-practice Award recipient Review analysis with panel Build consensus Select recipientDecision on which companyperforms best against allbest-practice criteria9Communica

cardiac monitoring as a means to detect arrhythmia early on and to prevent risks of stroke and heart failure. In this context, the cardiac monitoring industry offers several types of monitors that enable remote and continuous monitoring

Related Documents:

Cardiac rhythm & heart failure, cardiac catheter ablations, and cardiac diagnostic services . This highlights the percent of change in payment for major cardiac rhythm and heart failure, and cardiac catheter ablation therapies between OPPS 2021 payment . "Lifecycle of a Code: How the CPT and RUC Process Works." American Medical .

7 Introduction UHS Cardiac ICU Handbook – Second edition 2016 dependency unit, the coronary care unit (both on D-level), and cardiothoracic theatres, cardiac pre and post-op wards and cardiac catheter laboratories (all on E level). Familiarisation with Equipment There is a large array of equipment used on the cardiac intensive care unit.

Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) is a two day course that teaches students to recognize and treat cardiac arrest, arrhythmias, acute coronary syndromes, stroke, cardiac arrest in the pregnant woman, and cardiac arrest in situations involvi

Remote cardiac service providers have considerably higher indirect costs than do other IDTFs. Consequently, applying the IPCI applicable to IDTFs results in an allocation of indirect costs to remote cardiac monitoring services that is unfairly low. Similarly, use of physician work to a

Cardiac event monitors were developed to provide longer periods of monitoring and may be useful when the initial evaluation by Holter monitoring is non-diagnostic or when symptoms are infrequent. Remote cardiac monitoring technologies allow home electrocardiographic (EKG) monitoring of indivi

vices for remote cardiac monitoring. It will review the known and suspected cardiac clinical effects of COVID-19 virus. Finally, it will reevaluate the role of virtual solutions and home monitoring for cardiac patients in this new, rapidly disrupting healthcare model.

2019 Alfa Romeo Giulia 2019 BMW X7 2019 Alfa Romeo Stelvio 2019 BMW Z4 2019 Audi A3 2019 Buick Cascada 2019 Audi A4 2019 Buick Enclave 2019 Audi A5 2019 Buick Encore 2019 Audi A6 2019 Buick Envision 2019 Audi A7 2019 Buick LaCrosse 2019 Audi A8 2019 Buick Regal 2019 Audi Allroad

or a small group of countries, we explore possible drivers behind the decline in income inequality in Latin America as a whole. To undertake this task, we utilize an array of methodologies—including correlation and econometric techniques. To start, we look at simple correlations between changes in policy variables and changes in income inequality