CO2 Capture And Usage: Harnessing The CO2 Content In .

2y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
4.84 MB
18 Pages
Last View : 3m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Elise Ammons
Transcription

CO2 Capture and Usage: Harnessingthe CO2 Content in Natural Gas forEnvironmental and Economic GainsEmmanuel O. Agiaye and Mohammed Othman, Nigerian Agip Oil CompanySummaryCarbon dioxide (CO2) capture and usage (CCU) is currently a globaltopical issue, and is viewed as one possible route to reduction of CO2concentrations in the atmosphere. The core issues facing the worldin current times—development, economy, and environment—areidentified as being dependent on the provision of clean, efficient, affordable, and reliable energy services. Currently, the world is highlydependent on fossil fuels for provision of energy services, and theamount of which renewable energies can sufficiently replace is minimal. The deployment of appropriate CO2-separation technologiesfor the processing of natural gas is viewed as an abatement measuretoward global CO2-emissions reduction. Selection of the optimumtechnology among the several separation technologies for a particular separation need requires special attention to harness the economic and environmental benefits. The captured CO2 would alsorequire appropriate disposal or usage so as to sequester or “delay”its re-entry into the atmosphere. These challenges of CCU—involving natural gas particularly during processing, which has become an area of intense research—shall be discussed in the paperwith respect to the selected technique for CO2 capture. A typical natural-gas-production scenario in Nigeria shall be analyzed for potential CO2 capture. Further discussion shall be on the identification ofthe recovered CO2 gas-usage framework, such as CO2 flooding [inenhanced oil recovery (EOR)], for additional revenue generation,assessment of the CO2 savings, and the contribution to the clean development mechanism (CDM).IntroductionThe separation of CO2 from the gas stream is currently a globalissue. The increasing amounts of greenhouse gases (GHGs) in theatmosphere in recent years, considered to be partly responsible forclimate change, have been a serious global concern, and CO2 gashas been identified to as a major contributor of GHGs. Several postulations have proposed a long-term global stabilization of CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere to be a possible panacea for curtailingclimate change and global warming. The use of fossil fuels inclusiveof natural gas currently dominate the source of global energy supply,which are considered capable of meeting the world’s increasing energy needs up to 84% by 2030 (IEA 2008, page 47) from the currentdemand of approximately 81% (IEA 2012, page 10). CO2 emissionto the atmosphere from combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil, and natural gas) and during production/processing of natural gas is considered to be the major cause of high CO2 volumes in the atmosphere.It has been outlined that energy scenarios involving the use of cleanenergy technologies can result in a more than 50% reduction inglobal CO2 emissions up to 2050 (IEA 2010) with the deploymentof carbon capture and sequestration (CCS), inclusive of industry andCopyright 2016 Society of Petroleum EngineersThis paper (SPE 178316) was accepted for presentation at the SPE Nigeria AnnualInternational Conference and Exhibition, Lagos, 4–6 August 2015, and revised forpublication. Original manuscript received for review 7 September 2015. Revised manuscriptreceived for review 15 February 2016. Paper peer approved 22 February 2016.power generation, as capable of contributing up to 19% in CO2 reductions (IEA 2008, page 69). These are not withstanding the assessment performed by IEA (2012) with respect to “high potentialCO2 emissions” found with global “carbon reserves,” and therebyoutlining the deployment of CCS as the major technology requiredfor sustaining the projected demand on fossils. “The assessment hasattributed almost 63% to coal, 22% to oil and 15% to gas in CO2emissions potential locked in these reserves.” The case of CO2 innatural gas represents a typical scenario for a number of oil and gascompanies faced with the enormous challenge of reduced energylevel of sales gas making it subquality or when disposal by flaringincreases the source of CO2 emissions to the atmosphere. However,the amount of natural gas flared globally has been shown to contribute approximately 1.2% of the global CO2 emissions, which isgiven to be more than one-half of the certified emissions reductionsunder the Kyoto Protocol (ICF International 2006).There are several technologies and techniques now available forseparation of CO2 (or acid gases) from gas mixture, either as fluegas from power plants or from natural gas. In addition to deployment of these technologies, the captured or separated CO2 must bedisposed of in such a manner as to prevent it from seeping back intothe atmosphere. This is required to achieve the aims of the CDMfrom the use of fossil fuels. Among the fossil fuels, natural gas hasbeen shown to contain the least amount of CO2 emitted per tonnageof fuel burnt as compared with coal and oil. In addition to the CO2emitted during combustion, natural gas on production also containsa certain amount of impurities, including CO2 gas. The maximumlevel of CO2 permitted in natural-gas fuel is typically less than 3%.Hence, all natural gas is treated to remove the solids and free liquids and to reduce water-vapor content to acceptable levels and,especially, to meet pipeline specifications. Hence, natural gas mustbe purified through the removal of CO2 and other acid gases andimpurities (where present) because these impurities can form acidsin the presence of water to corrode pipelines and other equipment.In addition, higher concentrations of CO2 in natural gas reduce theheating value or energy level, which is below pipeline specifications, necessitating its removal before distribution to the end consumer. Natural gas has been a main source in meeting the world’senergy demand, contributing an estimated 23.81% in 2010 to theworld energy supply mix (Rufford et al. 2012, page 123). This contribution is projected to increase because natural gas is consideredthe cleaner fossil fuel compared with coal and oil. The deployment of appropriate CO2-capture technology in processing naturalgas stands to improve its value as the cleaner fossil fuel. In thispaper, a brief review of related acid-gas separation processes willbe reviewed and recommendations will be presented. Economicopportunities by use of the captured CO2 for additional revenuegeneration through EOR by CO2 flooding, as well as appropriatetransportation and storage infrastructure, will be reviewed.CO2-Capture TechnologiesThere are different techniques or technologies available today thatare used for the separation of CO2 from natural gas or from flueJune 2016      Oil and Gas FacilitiesSPE OGF 178316 160002.indd 1126/03/16 3:10 PM

PropertyKinetic diameter (Å)CH4CO2N23.803.303.64Normal boiling point [K (oC)]111.7 (–161.45)–77.3 (–195.85)Critical temperature [K (oC)]3.80 (–269.35)304.1 (30.95)126.2 (–46.95)Critical pressure [psi (bar)]667.2 (46)1,070.4 (73.8)493.1 (34) Hvap at NBP (KJ/mol)8.1726.15.58Polarizability (Å3)2.4482.5071.710Quadrupole moment (DÅ)0.024.31.54Table 1—Physical properties of CH4, CO2, and N2 (Rufford et al. 2012; Scholes et al. 2008, page 54).gas (from power plants). The type of separation process requiredin any particular case is often affected by the specifications of theproduct gas and the amount and composition of the gas mixture. Assimple as it may seem, the selection of the optimum technology suitable for the separation process may become an issue as a result of anumber of factors. This is because no one technology can perfectlysuit all the conditions required for separation. Hence, each is associated with its advantages and disadvantages. Typical factors that maybe considered for the separation of CO2 from natural gas include The CO2 content in the product gas, which is typically required at less than 2% The presence and concentration of other impurities in the feedgas, such as H2S and water content The presence and concentration of heavy hydrocarbon (HC)ends, contaminants, and water vapor The conditions available for processing the gas, such as thepressure, temperature, and volume of the feed gasHowever, the choice of a CO2-capture technology could be simplified by “exploiting the differences in the molecular propertiesor the thermodynamic and transport properties of the componentsin the mixture” (Rufford et al. 2012, page 125). Table 1 shows thephysical properties of a gas mixture [methane (CH4), CO2, and nitrogen (N2)] that can be exploited by use of the molecular-properties approach to achieve separation of these gases.Thermodynamic and transport properties can also be used toachieve separation by use of properties such as solubility, adsorption capacity, diffusivity, vapor pressure, and boiling points.On the basis of the molecular or thermodynamic and transportproperties of the gas components to be separated (Rufford et al.2012, page 125), approximately five separation mechanisms areusually applied, with which a suitable separation process could beselected. Generally, selection of the appropriate separation processdepends more on its characteristic separation power (SP) to achievethe desired gas specifications in addition to its economic viabilityin terms of the separated-products value.The following five separation mechanisms are commonly applied in any of the separation processes: Absorption—involves absorption in a liquid or solid sorbentthrough diffusion into the liquid or solid absorbing medium(for instance, amine absorption of CO2 in a scrubber process). Adsorption on a solid—involves the gas component to be separated, binding to the surface of a solid adsorbent such as activated carbon, silica gel, zeolites, and finely divided platinum.A typical example of an adsorption mechanism is the molecular-sieves-separation process for natural-gas purification. Permeation mechanism—involves separating components byuse of the principle of solubility diffusion to permeate througha membrane. Chemical conversion to another compound—for instance, thesteam-reformation process of natural gas to produce H2 andCO2, otherwise known as hydrogen economy. Phase creation by heat transfer—to (or from) the gas mixture,which involves use of phenomena such as condensation, desublimation, or distillation.The separation mechanisms as outlined in the preceding areeach characterized by a major property known as selectivity withrespect to the components to be separated. In particular, the equilibrium selectivity of the feed stream is usually a very importantproperty for the evaluation of absorption and adsorption separation processes. In membrane-permeation mechanisms, selectivity,for instance, is applied in the analysis of the process-separation capability, depending on the concentrations of the permeate (CO2rich gas) and feed stream. The performance of a separation processcan therefore be viewed as governed by the selectivity behaviorof the separation mechanism and engineering decisions leading tothe selection and implementation of the separation process. Typicalengineering decisions include aspects that will enhance or maximize the process efficiency, such as mitigation decisions of CO2plasticization of membranes. The separation-process performance,which is dependent on selectivity behavior, could therefore be related to the SP that is used to quantify the performance of the entireseparation process in terms of the feed-gas compositions (Seaderand Henley 2006). In Table 2, typical inherent selectivity valuesare shown as applicable to the separation mechanisms of the mostcommon separation technologies, especially for natural-gas-sweetening applications. The SP of each of the technologies is also given.The values show estimation of the inherent selectivity and SP required to produce typical pipeline-quality gas to less than 2% CO2from a natural-gas feed mixture of 5% CO2 (Rufford et al. 2012,page 126). From the table, one can easily notice the higher inherentSeparatingAgentTypical InherentEquilibriumSelectivity ( aCO2 -CH4 )Typical ProcessSP(SPCO2 -CH4)Membrane15–2020–40Adsorption—CO2 selectiveSolid adsorbent2.0–8.56.0–22Amine absorption (MDEA)Liquid absorbent8603,300Physical solvent (Chilled CH4)Liquid absorbent3181,900ProcessMembrane permeation – CO2selectiveMDEA methylenedioxyethylamphetamine.Table 2—The inherent equilibrium selectivity and SP for the separation of CO2 from CH4 (Ruffordet al. 2012).2Oil and Gas Facilities      June 2016SPE OGF 178316 160002.indd 226/03/16 3:10 PM

selectivity values with respect to CO2-component separation inthe process mechanisms of absorption by use of chemical-amineabsorption and physical-solvent absorption as compared with themembrane-permeation and -adsorption processes. The higher SPvalues are also an indication that the absorption mechanisms arepossibly better in separation of CO2 gas from natural gas.Given that considerations for inherent selectivity or SP aloneare not enough to determine the appropriate separation technologyfor gas separation, other design steps are usually to be taken by thedesign engineer through good-engineering practice toward the selection of the optimum and most-economical separation process. Inthe case of natural-gas purification involving the removal of CO2,other factors worthy of consideration include The assessment of the level of contaminants and impuritiesin the feed composition and requirement for removal level tomeet end-use specifications. The feed-gas conditions, such as temperature, pressure, watercontent, and flow rate. The method of removal of other acid gases other than CO2,such as H2S present in the feed gas. This requires the engineerto decide on the choice of either the selective- or the simultaneous-removal method or the appropriate separation mechanism to achieve an optimum process. The method of disposal or market usage of the separatedcomponent(s). Typical instances could include finding amarket for the captured CO2 for additional revenue generation, reinjection of the CO2 for EOR, and venting of N2 to atmosphere or N2 generation.A detailed cost and performance analysis, which can ultimatelylead to the determination of the best separation process under givenconditions, can thereby be performed by use of the preceding selection factors.Absorption in a Liquid (or Solid) SorbentAbsorption is referred to as “the transfer of a component of gasphase (CO2, H2S) into a liquid (or solid) phase in which it is soluble”(Kohl and Nielsen 1997, page 1). The process involves passing agas mixture through a liquid (or solid) such that one or more components of the gas mixture are dissolved selectively to provide asolution with the liquid (or solid). The gas component (the solute),forming solution with the liquid or solid (the sorbent), is said to beabsorbed by the sorbent. This absorption mechanism has been usedin many commercial gas-separation processes worldwide, especially in oil and gas operations, and is generally carried out in conventional industrial pressure vessels known as contactors, where amass transfer by direct contact and dispersion of one phase withinanother takes place (Dindore 2003, page 4). Depending on whetherthere is a chemical or physical reaction between the solute and thesorbent, absorption processes are basically available as chemicalabsorption and physical absorption, respectively.The basic process in chemical absorption in CO2 capture fromnatural gas involves the reaction of the CO2 with the sorbent toform weakly bonded intermediate compounds. On application ofheat, the CO2 is released from the compound, thereby regeneratingthe sorbent. The chemical solvents are somewhat favored at lowerpartial pressures (60 to 100 psia) above which physical solvents arepreferable (Freireich and Tennyson 1977).Some of the common chemical-absorption processes for acid-gastreating (particularly CO2 capture from natural gas) in the industryare as follows: Aqueous amine processes derived from ammonia (NH3): Forinstance, a tertiary amine process, such as MDEA (Ruffordet al. 2012, page 128)RR ′R ′′N CO 2 H 2 O RR ′R ′′NH HCO3 .In the preceding simplified reaction, the tertiary amine (sorbent) reacts exothermically with the CO2 in the natural-gasstream, usually at high pressure and low temperature, to forma carbamate-ion nitrogen/carbon bond, thereby capturing theCO2 from the gas stream. The carbamate-ion bond is thenbroken down at a higher temperature and low pressure to endothermically strip the CO2 in a regeneration process, whilethe lean amine solution is recycled back for another round ofcapture. The aqueous amine-based absorption can be achievedby use of primary, secondary, or tertiary amine solvents. Depending on the key requirement for CO2 capture, tertiaryamines have an advantage over secondary and primary aminesby regeneration-energy and loading-capacity requirements,whereas the primary and secondary amines are preferred interms of faster reaction rates with the acid gas (CO2) (Rackley2010, page 105). Hot-carbonate (alkali salt) systems: Use of hot solutions ofpotassium carbonate (K2CO3) or sodium carbonate (NaCO3)to remove CO2 from high-pressure gas streams (Rufford et al.2012, page 130):CO 2 ( g ) K 2 CO3 H 2 O(1) 2KHCO3 ( s )Similar to the amine-based process, the simplified reactionin the preceding gives the absorption of CO2 in a lean hotpotassium-carbonate stream, usually occurring in a counterflow arrangement between the hot alkali (sorbent) and the natural-gas stream. The rich alkali solution containing capturedCO2 is then regenerated and recycled back, with the entireprocess occurring at high temperatures. Aqueous ammonia-based absorption: Similar to the aminebased absorption, ammonia-based absorption involves thechemical reaction of ammonia and its derivatives with CO2to form a weak bond where CO2 is removed on applicationof heat. Compared with the amine-based process, the aqueousammonia process is shown to have lower energy requirements(Rufford et al. 2012, page 130), thereby lending it to possiblesignificant energy efficiency improvement and lower costs(Rackley 2010, page 105).Physical absorption involves the selective absorption or separation of CO2 from the natural-gas stream, where the rate of absorption increases with increasing pressure and at low temperature.The physical-absorption process uses the principle of gas (solute)solubility in the sorbent such that the dissolved volume is proportional to the partial pressure at a given temperature without reactingchemically with the sorbent (Rackley 2010, page 109). Physicalabsorption processes are generally favored at acid-gas (CO2) partial pressures greater than 200 psia (14 bara) (Rufford et al. 2012,page 128). Other factors considered favorable include low concentration of HCs (C6 ) and requirement for selective and bulk captureof CO2 in the gas mixture. The most common physical-absorptionprocesses used in the industry include Selexol (using the unioncarbide sorbent made of dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol),Rectisol (using chilled methanol sorbent), and fluor (based onpropylene carbonate sorbent) processes.In both the physical- and chemical-absorption processes, theamount of CO2 gas to be captured, as well as the CO2 loading capacity of the sorbent, determines the rate of circulation of the required sorbent; in addition to the energy required to regenerate thesorbent, these form the major cost factors in the absorption processes (Rufford et al. 2012, page 128). Despite the preceding constraints, the chemical-absorption processes with amine solutions,for instance, have been commonly used absorption processes forCO2 capture and gas sweetening within the natural-gas industry.In comparison with the physical-absorption solvents, the chemicalsolvents generally have higher energy requirements for regeneration (because the heat of absorption is much higher) and higheracid-g

June 2016 t Oil and Gas acilities 1 CO2 Capture and Usage: Harnessing the CO2 Content in Natural Gas for Environmental and Economic Gains Emmanuel O. Agiaye and Mohammed Othman, Nigerian Agip Oil Company power gener

Related Documents:

Kemppi 2500 ac/dc 1 Tig, alu, CO2 250 Kemppi MLS 3003 ac/dc 1 Tig, alu, rustfri 250 Kemppi KMS 400 1 CO2 500 Kemppi Pro evo 4200 3 CO2 400 1 with welding tractor Kemppi Kempomig 4000W 1 CO2 400 Kemppi MLS 3000 3 TIG, alu, CO2 250 Fronius Transtig 3000 1 TIG 300 Kemppi Weld 400 2 CO2 400 Kempact MIG 2530 1 CO2 250 Kemppi Mat 320 1 CO2 320 Kemppi .

Kemppi 2500 ac/dc 1 Tig, alu, CO2 250 Kemppi MLS 3003 ac/dc 1 Tig, alu, rustfri 250 Kemppi KMS 400 1 CO2 500 Kemppi Pro evo 4200 3 CO2 400 1 med svejsetraktor Kemppi Kempomig 4000W 1 CO2 400 Kemppi MLS 3000 3 TIG, alu, CO2 250 Fronius Transtig 3000 1 TIG 300 Kemppi Weld 400 2 CO2 400 Kempact MIG 2530 1 CO2 250 Kemppi Mat 320 1 CO2 320 Kemppi 1 .

HowtoImplement Embedded Packet Capture Managing Packet DataCapture SUMMARYSTEPS 1. enable 2. monitor capture capture-name access-list access-list-name 3. monitor capture capture-name limit duration seconds 4. monitor capture capture-name interface interface-name both 5. monitor capture capture-name buffer circular size bytes .

Materials 2017, 10, 629 2 of 26 There are at least three routes of lowering the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere: (i) direct reduction of CO2 emission; (ii) CO2 capture and storage (CCS); and (iii) CO2 utilization [5-7]. Lowering the CO2 emission may seem quite unrealistic because of the present human lifestyle and emergent use of fossil fuel. The potential of CCS technology can be restrained .

2. monitor capture capture-name access-list access-list-name 3. monitor capture capture-name limit duration seconds 4. monitor capture capture-name interface interface-name both 5. monitor capture capture-name buffer circular size bytes EmbeddedPacketCaptureOverview 4 EmbeddedPacketCaptureOverview PacketDataCapture

The captured CO2 must then be purified and compressed for transport and storage. It is possible to reduce the CO2 emissions from new power plants by about 80 to 90%, but this increases the cost of electricity produced by 35 to 85%. For industrial processes where a relatively pure CO2 stream is produced, the cost per tonne of CO2 captured is .

Sample Capture Session switch1(config)#monitor session 3 type capture switch1(config-mon-capture)#buffer-size 65535 switch1(config-mon-capture)#source interface gi4/15 both switch1#sh monitor capture Capture instance [1] : Capture Session ID : 3 Session status : up rate-limit value : 10000 redirect index : 0x809 buffer-size : 2097152

are required with reduced weight. Experimental tests are executed following ASTM or UNI EN rules, in particular the shear test is executed using a rig constructed to the purpose, designed following the rule ASTM D 4255-83. Besides the tests were simulated by analytical methods, by means of Cadec software and numerically