State Laws, Agency Policies, Or Regulations Related To .

2y ago
9 Views
2 Downloads
338.62 KB
10 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jerry Bolanos
Transcription

State Laws, Agency Policies, or RegulationsRelated to LGBTQ Youth in the Child Welfare SystemNo updates required since May 10, 2021Alabama State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system. State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See HB 24 (2017).Alaska State agency explicitly interprets existing protections against discrimination in public servicesbased on sex to include both sexual orientation and gender identity. See Alaska StateCommission for Human Rights (2020), including agency social media posts. See also Alaska DHSSDiscrimination Complaint Form, enumerating sexual orientation and gender identity orexpression.Arizona State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system. State agency policy provides that youth should receive services and resources related to theirsexual orientation and gender identity, but does not prohibit discrimination. See Policy andProcedures Manual Chapter 5, Section 35: Independent Living Services & Supports.Arkansas State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system.California State law prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity in theprovision of state programs and activities; SB 1441 (2006; effective 2007). State law prohibits discrimination against youth in the child welfare system on the bases ofsexual orientation and gender identity. See AB 458 (2003; effective 2004), Cal. WIC 16001.9, andCal. Code Regs. tit. 22, §83072. State law requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for foster agencies and staff.See AB 458 (2003) and Cal. Code Regs. tit. 22, § 88022. State law requires that transgender youth in out-of-home care be placed according to theirgender identity. See SB 731 (2015), and Cal. WIC 16001.9.19

Colorado State law includes protections against discrimination for youth in the child welfare system onthe bases of sexual orientation and gender identity (enumerated separately). See SB 11-120(2011) and CRS 19-7-101. State’s nondiscrimination law applies to state (via definition of person), including child welfareagency and government services (via definition of public accommodations, including “any placeoffering services to the public”). State’s nondiscrimination law enumerates SO, defined toinclude GI (2008). State law prohibits gender identity discrimination in housing, which may apply to placement inthe child welfare system. See 3 Colo. Code Regs. § 708-1:81.9.Connecticut State agency policy prohibits discrimination in adoption, foster care, and for youth in the childwelfare system on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See DCF’sNondiscrimination Statement, first issued as Policy 30-9, May 2004. State agency policy requires that transgender youth in out-of-home care be placed according totheir gender identity. See DCF’s “Working with Transgender Youth and Caregivers PracticeGuide” as of Dec 2018, and as early as Dec 2014 (p5). Note: LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training is available but not required. State’s nondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation (1991) and gender identity (2011)Delaware State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals (adults and youth) based onsexual orientation and gender identity. See DSCYF’s Policy #217 (April 2019, and as early as Nov2012 as Policy CS-008). State’s nondiscrimination law explicitly includes state, local, and tax-funded agencies performingpublic functions (via definition of public accommodations). State’s nondiscrimination lawenumerates sexual orientation (2009) and gender identity (2013).District of Columbia State agency policy prohibits discrimination in adoption, foster care, and for youth in the childwelfare system on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See CFSA’s Statement ofNondiscrimination (2011) and Gender Identity and Expression Policy (2017) State’s nondiscrimination law explicitly includes/applies to the state, state licenses, benefits,and more (§ 2–1402.67). State’s nondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation (1977)and gender identity (2006).

Florida State regulation includes protections against discrimination for youth in the child welfare systemon the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See FAC 65C-14.021 (2016) and FAC 65C14.040 (2016). State regulation includes a protocol for determining whether transgender youth in out-of-homecare should be placed according to their gender identity. See FAC 65C-14.040 (2016). State regulation requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for staff working directlywith children. See FAC 65C-14.023 (2016).Georgia State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system.Hawai i State law and policy prohibit discrimination against all individuals (adults and youth) in the childwelfare system on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See DHS’s DiscriminationComplaints Policy (2014) and Rights of Children in Foster Care (2018; from SB 2790 (2018)).Idaho State has policy-based protections against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation,gender identity, and gender expression. See Idaho Youth in Care Bill of Rights (2015).Illinois State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all DCFS service recipients on the bases ofsexual orientation and gender identity. See DCFS’s Affirmative Action Statement (at least asearly as Feb 2017). State has policy-based protections against discrimination against youth in the child welfaresystem on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See Illinois Foster Child andYouth Bill of Rights (2016) State policy provides transgender youth with the right to be placed according to their genderidentity. See Illinois Foster Child and Youth Bill of Rights (2016). State policy requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training. See Illinois Foster Child andYouth Bill of Rights (2016) State nondiscrimination law applies to public officials (775 ILCS 5-102). State’s nondiscriminationlaw enumerates sexual orientation, defined to include gender identity (2005, effective 2006)Indiana State agency policy prohibits discrimination against individuals based on sexual orientation. SeeIndiana Department of Child Services Code of Conduct (2020; SO included as early as May 2010). State agency policy prohibits discrimination against youth in the child welfare system on thebases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See Indiana Bill of Rights for Youth in FosterCare (2013).

Iowa State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all DHS clients and applicants on the basesof sexual orientation and gender identity. See Iowa Department of Human Services NonDiscrimination Policy (as early as June 2012).State’s nondiscrimination law explicitly includes/applies to state and local government and “taxsupported districts” (VI §216.2, via definition of public accommodations). State’snondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation and gender identity (2007).Kansas State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system. State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See SB 284 (2018).Kentucky State regulation prohibits discrimination against all individuals (adults and youth) on the basesof sexual orientation and gender identity in all government services. See Executive Order 2020554 (June 2020).Louisiana State regulation includes protections against discrimination for youth in the child welfare systemon the basis of sexual orientation only. See LAC 67-V §7311(E)(5) (2011) and LAC 67-V§7115(A)(5) (2011).Maine State agency policy prohibits discrimination in its programs and services on the basis of sexualorientation (defined in state law to include gender identity). See Maine DHHS NondiscriminationNotice (June 2017) and §4553 (2005) State agency policy prohibits discrimination against youth in the child welfare system on thebases of sexual orientation, gender identity, and gender expression. See The Maine Youth inCare Bill of Rights (2008, revised 2016). State’s nondiscrimination law explicitly includes/applies to state and local governments,agencies, and departments (5 § 4553.8, via definition of public accommodations). State’snondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation, defined to include gender identity (2005).

Maryland State nondiscrimination law explicitly applies to government units, officers, and employees(§20-901), including in public accommodations (§20-304). State’s nondiscrimination lawenumerates sexual orientation (2001) and gender identity (2014). State regulation includes protections against discrimination for youth in the child welfare systemon the basis of sexual orientation only. See Md. Code Regs. 10.57.05.03(C). State policy requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training. See Policy SSA-CW #17-08(2016), updated 2018. Placement of transgender youth will be made on a case-by-case basis with input from thetransgender child, and “shall not be based on the youth’s sex assigned at birth.” See Policy SSACW #17-08 (2016), updated 2018.Massachusetts State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals (adults and youth) on thebases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See DCF’s LGBTQ – A Guide for Working WithYouth and Families, pC-12, as early as Spring 2015. See also Massachusetts Foster Child Bill ofRights (2009). State agency policy includes guidance for placing transgender youth according to genderidentity. See DCF’s LGBTQ – A Guide for Working With Youth and Families, pD-16, as early asSpring 2015. State regulation protects against discrimination for all applicants/recipients (adults and youth)of Department services on the basis of sexual orientation only. See 110 CMR 1.09 (2000). Executive Order 526 (Feb 2011) required that “all programs, activities, and services provided,performed, licensed, chartered, funded, regulated, or contracted for by the state shall beconducted without unlawful discrimination” based on sexual orientation and gender identity. State nondiscrimination law applies to the state and state services (via definition of publicaccommodations). State nondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation (1989) andgender identity (2016).Michigan State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals based on sexual orientation,gender identity, and gender expression. See MDHHS Nondiscrimination Statement (2019, and asearly as July 2009). See also Dumont settlement (March 2019).o However, in Sept 2019, a federal judge issued a preliminary injunction of the Dumontsettlement, meaning that a trial will need to be held to determine the status of religiousexemptions and nondiscrimination in child welfare services. State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See HB 4188 (2015), HB 4189 (2015), and HB 4190 (2015).

Minnesota State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals based on sexual orientation,defined in state law to include gender identity. See DHS Nondiscrimination Statement (as earlyas April 2008). See also MN DHS Working with lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender andquestioning/queer youth (2013). State regulation includes protections against discrimination for youth in the child welfare systemon the basis of sexual orientation, defined in state law to include gender identity. See Minn. R.2960.0050, Minn. R. 2960.0080, and Minn. R. 2960.3080 (2003). State regulation requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for child welfare staff.See Minn. R. 2960.0150 (2003).Mississippi State has regulatory-based protection against discrimination on account of sexual orientationand gender identity for youth in the child welfare system. See CMR 18-6:1.D-XII Appendix L,Appendix M (2017; instituted 2013). State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See HB 1523 (2016).Missouri State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals based on sexual orientationonly. See Missouri DSS Nondiscrimination Policy Statement (as early as June 2006). See also Children’s Division “Best Practices Guidance for Supporting LGBTQ Youth in Foster Carefor Child Welfare Staff” (2020).Montana State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals based on sexual orientationonly. See DPHHS Nondiscrimination Policy (effective May 2010).Nebraska State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system.Nevada State law and policy includes protections against discrimination for youth in the child welfaresystem on the bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See NRS §432.525 and Nevada'sFoster Youth Bill of Rights (2011). State law requires transgender youth to be placed in accordance with their gender identity. SeeAB 99 (2017). State law requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for providers. See AB 99 (2017). State’s nondiscrimination law explicitly includes “adoption agency or other social serviceestablishment” (NRS 651.050, in definition of public accommodations). State’snondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation (2009) and gender identity (2011).

New Hampshire State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals on the bases of sexualorientation and gender identity. See DCYF Policy Directive 17-50 (August 2017). State nondiscrimination law applies to the state and its agencies (via definitions of person andpublic accommodations). State’s nondiscrimination law enumerates sexual orientation (1997)and gender identity (2018).New Jersey State regulation and agency policy prohibit discrimination against all individuals on the bases ofsexual orientation and gender identity. See NJAC Title 3A (2019), DCF’s LGBTQI Policy (Aug2016), DCF’s Policy No. 100 (April 2011), and Manual of Requirements for Resource FamilyParents, 10:122C-1.6New Mexico State has regulatory-based protection against discrimination against all individuals on the basesof sexual orientation and gender identity. See NMAC 8.26.5.15 (2009). State requires agency-provided LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for current orprospective foster parents. See NMAC 8.26.5.18 (2009).New York State regulations and agency policy prohibit discrimination against youth (and all individuals) onthe bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See NYOCFS Policy and Procedures Manual(2008), as well as regulations in 18 CRR-NY §441.24 (foster), 18 CRR-NY §423.4 (preventiveservices), and 18 CRR-NY §421.3 (adoption). Youth can request particular placement on the bases of sexual orientation or gender identityand requests will be taken into consideration in placement determinations. See NYOCFS Policyand Procedures Manual (2008). State has a policy requiring LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for agency staff. SeeNYOCFS Policy and Procedures Manual (2008).North Carolina State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system.North Dakota State agency explicitly interprets existing protections against discrimination in public servicesbased on sex to include both sexual orientation and gender identity. See North DakotaDepartment of Labor and Human Rights statement (2020). State regulation prohibits discrimination against youth in the child welfare system on the basisof sexual orientation only. See NDAC 75-03-36-35 (April 2010) and North Dakota Foster CareHandbook for Youth (Jan 2014). State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See ND Century Code §50-12-07.1 (2003).

Ohio State regulation prohibits discrimination against youth in the child welfare system on the basesof sexual orientation and “sexual identity” only. See Ohio Admin. Code 5101:2-7-09 (2014).Oklahoma State regulation prohibits discrimination against youth in the child welfare system on the basesof sexual orientation and gender identity. See OAC 340:75-14-1(b) (2019), Form 04IL011E Rightsof Oklahoma Foster Youth (p57, 2016), and DHS’s LGBTQ Children, Youth, and Families PracticeGuidebook (2019). State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See SB 1140 (2018).Oregon State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals on the basis of sexualorientation, defined in state law to include gender identity. See Oregon Department of HumanServices, Children, Adults and Families Policy No. I-A.1, Client Rights – Policy (2007).Pennsylvania State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system.o However, state has a regulation prohibiting discrimination against youth in the childwelfare system only in the context of residential facilities, based on sexual orientationonly. See 55 Pa. Code § 3800.32.Rhode Island State law prohibits state agencies from discriminating in the provision of services based onsexual orientation (1995) and gender identity (2001) (§28-5.1-7) State has law and regulatory-based protections against discrimination against all individuals onthe bases of sexual orientation and gender identity. See R.I. Gen. L. 42-72-15 (2015, Children’sBill of Rights), 214-RICR-10-00-1.14(c), and 214-RICR-40-00-4. State agency policy prohibited discrimination based on sexual orientation only as early as Sept2009, and both sexual orientation and gender identity by October 2011. State agency policy requires LGBTQ-inclusive cultural competency training for DCYF staff. SeeStaff Protocol: Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity and Expression (2016).South Carolina State has no explicit protection against discrimination on the bases of sexual orientation orgender identity for youth in the child welfare system. State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See HB 4950, §38.29 (2018). See also Trump administration waiver offederal nondiscrimination requirements (2019).

South Dakota State agency policy prohibits discrimination against all individuals on the bases of sexualorientation and gender identity. See DSS’s Notice of Nondiscrimination (adopted 2014). State permits state-licensed child welfare agencies to refuse to place and provide services tochildren and families, including LGBTQ people and same-sex couples, if doing so conflicts withtheir religious beliefs. See SB 149 (2017).Tennessee State agency policy prohibits discrimination against

State agency policy provides that youth should receive services and resources related to their sexual orientation and gender identity, but does not prohibit discrimination. See Policy and Procedures Manual Chapter 5, Section

Related Documents:

laws, foreign investment is governed by laws of general application (e.g., company laws, contract laws, environmental protection laws, land-use laws, laws guaranteeing compensation for expropriation of property, etc.), along with sector-specific laws, which govern the admission of new investment in sectors

enforcement of other criminal laws, 8such as apostasy laws, anti-conversion laws, incitement to religious hatred laws (also often referred to as "hate speech" laws), anti-extremism laws, and even anti-witchcraft laws. Mob activity, threats, and/or violence around blasphemy allegations occur both at times when the state enforces the law

21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership . About the Laws The laws can be learned The laws can stand alone The laws carry some consequences The laws are the foundation of leadership . 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership . The Law of

Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. Defense Commissary Agency. Defense Contract Audit Agency. Defense Contract Management Agency * Defense Finance and Accounting Service. Defense Health Agency * Defense Information Systems Agency * Defense Intelligence Agency * Defense Legal Services Agency. Defense Logistics Agency * Defense POW/MIA .

Myanmar language. · Moreover, it translated laws into English and published in three volumes as "Myanmar Laws( 1988-1989)", "Myanmar Laws( 1997)" and "Myanmar Laws( 1998-1999)". This issue "Myanmar Laws(2000)" is the·con inuation of the publication mentioned above. "Myanmar Laws(1990)"

Infant Safe Haven Laws: Summary of State Laws Many State legislatures have enacted legislation to address infant abandonment and infanticide in response to a reported increase in the abandonment of infants. Beginning in Texas in 1999, "Baby Moses laws" or infant safe haven laws have been enacted as an incentive for mothers in crisis to

Genesis 3 laws Exodus 111 laws Leviticus 247 laws Numbers 52 laws Deuteronomy 200 laws As shown above, the laws are contained inside a story framework that traces the “history” events from the moment of creation in Genesis 1 down to the

laws, at least 25 criminalize blasphemy, and at least 29 have laws against hate speech In exploring the prevalence and nature of these laws, this report shines light on the following trends: Blasphemy and apostasy laws are often overbroad and can be used to limit a variety of religious expression These laws violate international