Ground System Design - MIT OpenCourseWare

2y ago
32 Views
2 Downloads
1.09 MB
26 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : River Barajas
Transcription

Ground System DesignCol John Keesee6/17/20041Lesson ObjectivesThe student will:1. Be able to list the functions performed by a space systems ground supportsystem.2. Know factors in ground station design3. Know components of ground station architecture4. Know capabilities of typical dedicated ground systems and common multi-userground support systems5. Know design considerations for specifying ground system elements.1

Overview Ground Systems– Support the space segment Command and ControlMonitor spacecraft healthTrackCalculate spacecraft attitude– Relay mission data to the users6/17/20042Ground systems have a command (uplink) function as well as a data (telemetry andmission data) function.2

Ground Station Design Location, location, location–––––CoverageData-user needsCostAccessibilityAvailability Link data rates– G/Ts, EIRP Requirements for data handling Communication between ground system elementsand data users6/17/20043These are the important factors in ground station design. The spacecraft orbit andmission characteristics will drive available locations for ground systems.Satellite transmitter characteristics and data rates will determine the groundsystem’s transmitter and receiver operating characteristics.Because the facilities that process data may not be co-located with the receivingsystem, the ground system will have its own terrestrial and space communicationlinks.3

Ground System Elements Mission elements and facility elements Ground station is where the Earth-based end ofsatellite communication takes place––––––––Antenna systemReceive RF equipmentTransmit RF equipmentMission data recoveryData-user interfaceTT&C equipmentStation control centerSystem clock6/17/20044The ground system consists of both mission (functional) elements and facilities.A ground station would usually consist of most of these elements4

Control Centers Spacecraft Operations Control Centers– Monitors and commands the spacecraft bus– Analyzes spacecraft telemetry– Coordinates and controls Payload ControlCenter access– Includes data monitoring equipment,commanding facilities and communications6/17/20045In most cases, the spacecraft operations control center controls the overall mission,even though the payload is the reason for the mission. The SOCC monitors thehealth and status of the bus and, in some architectures, the payload as well.Sometimes it’s a multi-mission facility, and many times is separated physicallyfrom the payload operations control center.5

Control Centers continued Payload Operations Control Center– Analyzes telemetry and mission data from instruments– Issues commands to instruments Mission Control Center– Plans and operates the space mission SOCC, POCC and MCC may not be co-located May require hot spares to maintain highavailability Survivability may dictate multiple ground systemsites for coverage and redundancy6/17/20046The entire focus of the POCC is the payload, its monitoring, management andcontrol.The mission control center would be responsible for the entire constellation ofsatellites.The SOCC, the POCC and the MCC are many times not co-located.When the availability requirement is very high we may specify multiple systemsrunning in parallel (hot spares) to minimize the downtime in case of a failure.6

Communication Links Communication support required betweenground system elements and data-users– Landline and satellite connections– International links through comsats andterminal equipment Intelsat, Telstar, Westar, DSCS, Milstar– Internet protocols6/17/20047The communication links between the SOCC, the POCC and the MCC might bethrough landlines, satellite connections, or the internet. Typically military systemsmay use the Defense Satellite Communication System to relay information betweennodes.7

Data Handling ding—DecodingData CompressionTime TaggingData storageData quality monitoring6/17/20048Data from the satellite are usually multi-plexed (usually Time division multipleaccess) to allow communication with multiple satellites over the same link.We discussed these functions in the lesson on TT&C8

Defense Meteorology SatelliteProgram Spacecraft uplink– L-band (1.75 to 1.85 GHz) 2 kbps (command) Downlink– S-band (2.2 to 2.3 GHz) 1024 kbps (mission data) Command Readout stations and AFSCN Mission data transfer from ground stations to DMSPcentral facilities via domestic satellite and landlines Similar connections to large data processing centers Some data-users receive direct from the spacecraft6/17/200499

Alternatives to Dedicated GroundSystems Host systems provide some or all parts ofthe ground system– Saves money, has high reliability andavailability– However, may not be optimum for a specificmission Sharing resources requires scheduling coordinationand prioritization– May impact user mission6/17/20041010

Air Force Satellite ControlNetwork Eight ground stations (RTS) with two antennaseach Two central locations– Consolidated Space Test Center at Sunnyvale CA– Consolidated Space Operations Center at SchrieverAFB CO Combined SOCC, POCC, and MCC at eitherCSTC or CSOC Communication links via landline and comsats– DSCS and Intelsat6/17/20041111

AFSCN continued 18m and 14m antennas for TT&C and missiondata Space Ground Link System (SGLS)– Twenty channel pairs (one uplink, two downlinkcarriers)– 1.024 Mbps downlink at 2.2—2.3 GHz– 2 kbps uplink at 1.75—1.85 GHz– Provides range, range rate, telemetry and mission data Non-SGLS downlinks provide up to 5 Mbps6/17/20041212

NASA Tracking and Data RelaySatellite System Three geo-synchronous relay satellites– Supports 20 sub-synchronous satellites multiple-accessS-band links 2.1064 GHz forward or command link (uplink) 2.2875 GHz return or downlink– Two each single-access links at S-band and Ku-band 2.025—2.120 GHz forward link (S-band) 2.200—2.300 GHz for the return path 13.775 GHz forward and 15.003 GHz return (Ku-band)6/17/20041313

TDRSS continued Ground station at White Sands NM Satellites act as “bent pipe” to all traffic G/Ts and EIRP specified in SMAD Fig 15-9 and15-10 Command data and telemetry through NASA’sNASCOM communication network Combination ground system centers provided atGoddard (Greenbelt MD) and Johnson SpaceCenters (Houston TX)6/17/20041414

TDRSS Overview6/17/20041515

TDRSS Spacecraft6/17/20041616

TDRSS Antennas6/17/20041717

TDRSS Constellation6/17/20041818

TDRS H, I, J6/17/200419Image taken from NASA's website. http://www.nasa.gov. Used with permission.19

TDRSS Ground Antennas6/17/20042020

TDRSS Ground Antennas6/17/20042121

Commercial Ground Systems Typically S-band and X-band downlink and Sband uplink Downlink data rates to 15 Mbps (S-band) and to150 Mbps (X-band) Uplink data rates to 1.5 Mbps Time division multiplexed (TDM) andConsultative Committee for Space Data Systems(CCSDS) telemetry formats User communication uses IP and dialup ordedicated lines6/17/20042222

Commercial Ground Systemscontinued Commercial Ground Network (UniversalSpacenet)– Ground stations in Alaska and Hawaii Ground Network System (Allied SignalTechnical Service Corporation– Ground stations in Greenland, Alaska andNorway6/17/20042323

Design Considerations Required satellite coverage determines thenumber and location of ground stations– LEOs are particularly demanding because ofshort and infrequent contact opportunities– Large quantities of mission data must be storedon board and downlinked in short periods– Infrequent TT&C contact demands more onboard autonomy6/17/20042424

Design Considerations continued Data user distribution drives processing andcommunication requirements6/17/20042525

References Wertz, James R. and Wiley J. Larson, SpaceMission Analysis and Design, Third ed.,Microcosm Press, Torrance CA, 1999 http://www.losangeles.af.mil/SMC/PA/FactSheets/cw fs.htm 42626

– Twenty channel pairs (one uplink, two downlink carriers) – 1.024 Mbps downlink at 2.2—2.3 GHz – 2 kbps uplink at 1.75—1.85 GHz – Provides range, range rate, telemetry and mission data

Related Documents:

Unlocking Knowledge, Empowering Minds About MIT OpenCourseWare › MIT OpenCourseWare Free and open educational resource (Syllabi, lecture notes, videos, psets, exams, Java applets ) No credit, degrees, or faculty access 1.5 - 2 million visitors/month (including 10,000 HS students) Publishing 1

PowerBook 145B/80 B1433 MIT 1370 PowerBook Duo 230/ 120 B1432 MIT 2480 ThinkPad 720/160 9552-308 MIT 3245 ThinkPad 720C/160 9552-30J MIT 4540 DeskJet 500 HP-C2106A MIT 370 LaserJet lIP Plus HP-C2007A MIT 790 Value Bundle 4MB RAM/120MB hard disk MIT 1215 Value Bundle

1.50 -1.00 -0.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 We want to estimate the worst 1% of the possible outcomes. Developed for educational use at MIT and for publication through MIT OpenCourseware. No investme

megger test report. pt. radius sembilan utama. inspection & certification. 086/rds-ms/ut.bp/vi/2021. 4 report of megger test. ship's name : tb. karya star 6 place of inspection : samarinda date of inspection : juni, 30 - 2021 satuan mega ohm no r-ground s-ground t-ground j-ground k-ground u-ground v-ground w-ground remarks

djain@mit.edu, sra@mit.edu, jguo01@risd.edu, rvictor@mit.edu, raywu22@mit.edu, juschiu@mit.edu, geek@mit.edu ABSTRACT We present Amphibian, a simulator to experience scuba diving virtually in a terrestrial setting. While existing diving simulators mostly focus on visual and aural di

For Peer Review A OverCode: Visualizing Variation in Student Solutions to Programming Problems at Scale ELENA L. GLASSMAN, MIT CSAIL JEREMY SCOTT, MIT CSAIL RISHABH SINGH, MIT CSAIL PHILIP J. GUO, MIT CSAIL and University of Rochester ROBERT C. MILLER, MIT CSAIL In MOOCs, a single programming exercise may produce thousands of solutions from learners.

3.2.1 Fokussieren mit »autofocus« 60 3.2.2 Platzhalter-Text mit »placeholder« 61 3.2.3 Verpflichtende Felder mit »required« 62 3.2.4 Noch mehr neue Attribute für das »¡nput«-Element 62 3.3 Neue Elemente 65 3.3.1 Anzeigen von Messgrdfien mit »meter« 65 3.3.2 Fortschrittsanzeige mit »progress« 68 3.3.3 Auswahllisten mit »datalist« 69

MIT 401(k) Oversight Committee, 2014-2019. MIT Committee on Graduate Programs, 2017-2019. MIT International Advisory Committee . MITx Faculty Advisory Committee . MIT Sloan: International Initiatives Committee, Co-Chair of Space Committee, Chair of Load Committee, and Member of various standing committees, MIT Sloan School of Management, 2011-2015.