Managing System Integrity Of Gas Pipelines

2y ago
98 Views
23 Downloads
1.11 MB
5 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Jenson Heredia
Transcription

This is a preview of "ASME B31.8S-2012". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.ASME B31.8S-2012(Revision of ASME B31.8S-2010)ManagingSystem Integrityof Gas PipelinesASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31Supplement to ASME B31.8A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L STA N DA R D

This is a preview of "ASME B31.8S-2012". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.ASME B31.8S-2012(Revision of ASME B31.8S-2010)ManagingSystem Integrityof Gas PipelinesASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31Supplement to ASME B31.8A N A M E R I C A N N AT I O N A L S TA N D A R DThree Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 USA

This is a preview of "ASME B31.8S-2012". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.Date of Issuance: January 11, 2013The next edition of this Code is scheduled for publication in 2014.ASME issues written replies to inquiries concerning interpretations of technical aspects of this Code.Periodically certain actions of the ASME B31 Committee may be published as Cases. Casesand interpretations are published on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages athttp://cstools.asme.org/ as they are issued.Errata to codes and standards may be posted on the ASME Web site under the Committee Pages toprovide corrections to incorrectly published items, or to correct typographical or grammatical errorsin codes and standards. Such errata shall be used on the date posted.The Committee Pages can be found at http://cstools.asme.org/. There is an option available toautomatically receive an e-mail notification when errata are posted to a particular code or standard.This option can be found on the appropriate Committee Page after selecting “Errata” in the “PublicationInformation” section.ASME is the registered trademark of The American Society of Mechanical Engineers.This code or standard was developed under procedures accredited as meeting the criteria for American NationalStandards. The Standards Committee that approved the code or standard was balanced to assure that individuals fromcompetent and concerned interests have had an opportunity to participate. The proposed code or standard was madeavailable for public review and comment that provides an opportunity for additional public input from industry, academia,regulatory agencies, and the public-at-large.ASME does not “approve,” “rate,” or “endorse” any item, construction, proprietary device, or activity.ASME does not take any position with respect to the validity of any patent rights asserted in connection with anyitems mentioned in this document, and does not undertake to insure anyone utilizing a standard against liability forinfringement of any applicable letters patent, nor assumes any such liability. Users of a code or standard are expresslyadvised that determination of the validity of any such patent rights, and the risk of infringement of such rights, isentirely their own responsibility.Participation by federal agency representative(s) or person(s) affiliated with industry is not to be interpreted asgovernment or industry endorsement of this code or standard.ASME accepts responsibility for only those interpretations of this document issued in accordance with the establishedASME procedures and policies, which precludes the issuance of interpretations by individuals.No part of this document may be reproduced in any form,in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise,without the prior written permission of the publisher.The American Society of Mechanical EngineersThree Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990Copyright 2013 byTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERSAll rights reservedPrinted in U.S.A.

This is a preview of "ASME B31.8S-2012". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.CONTENTSForeword . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Committee Roster . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Summary of Changes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .vvix1Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .12Integrity Management Program Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23Consequences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84Gathering, Reviewing, and Integrating Data. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95Risk Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .126Integrity Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .177Responses to Integrity Assessments and Mitigation (Repair and Prevention). . . . . .218Integrity Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .279Performance Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2810Communications Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3311Management of Change Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3412Quality Control Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3513Terms, Definitions, and Acronyms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .3514References and Standards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41Integrity Management Program Elements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Integrity Management Plan Process Flow Diagram . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Potential Impact Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Timing for Scheduled Responses: Time-Dependent Threats, PrescriptiveIntegrity Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Hierarchy of Terminology for Integrity Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . )-19.4(c)-1Data Elements for Prescriptive Pipeline Integrity Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Typical Data Sources for Pipeline Integrity Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Integrity Assessment Intervals: Time-Dependent Threats, Internal andExternal Corrosion, Prescriptive Integrity Management Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Acceptable Threat Prevention and Repair Methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Example of Integrity Management Plan for Hypothetical Pipeline Segment(Segment Data: Line 1, Segment 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Example of Integrity Management Plan for Hypothetical Pipeline Segment(Integrity Assessment Plan: Line 1, Segment 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Example of Integrity Management Plan for Hypothetical Pipeline Segment(Mitigation Plan: Line 1, Segment 3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Performance Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Performance Metrics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .Overall Performance Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iii253610111423292930313232

This is a preview of "ASME B31.8S-2012". Click here to purchase the full version from the ANSI store.Nonmandatory AppendicesAThreat Process Charts and Prescriptive Integrity Management Plans . . . . . . . . . . .BDirect Assessment Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .CPreparation of Technical Inquiries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .iv456566

ASME B31.8S-2012 (Revision of ASME B31.8S-2010) Managing System Integrity of Gas Pipelines ASME Code for Pressure Piping, B31 Supplement to ASME B31.8 AN AMERICAN NATIONAL STANDARD Three Park Avenue New York, NY 10016 USA This is a preview of "ASME B31.8S-2012". Cli

Related Documents:

Integrity ONE* 41x51x15.5cm Integrity DUE XL* 43.5x67x21cm Integrity TOP* 37x51x15.5cm Integrity Q* 41x51x17.5cm Integrity, the Silestone kitchen sink Seamless Integration More than 90% Quartz and 100% Innovation Integrity ONE In one single piece ONE is the model which embodies Integrity's concept. A single kitchen sink in one piece.

May 20, 2008 · Power Integrity in System Design CAE / Design Simulation Skipper Liang 5/20/2008. 2 Agenda Introduction Power Integrity Concept DC Analysis for Power Integrity AC Analysis for Power Integrity Summary Q & A 1. Observe from Frequency Domain 2. Observe from Time Domain. 3 Introduction Power Integrity Concept DC

Integrity. A single sink, in one piece, measuring 41x51x15,5cm., ONE is 1, with its curved outline, the perfect choice for lovers of fluid design and originality. Integrity Integrity DUE L Integrity ONE Integrity DUE S Integrity DUE XL. . Price Groups Silestone .

aging organizational integrity risks . Organizational integrity is defined as an organization func-tioning consistently with the purposes and values for which it was created . There are two types of integrity issues an organization must monitor: Integrity violations are actions on the part of organizational members that undermine

Ten RecommendaTionS foR managing oRganizaTional inTegRiTy RiSkS iBm center for The Business of government The purpose of this report is to provide public managers with a better understanding of man-aging organizational integrity risks . Organizational integrity is defined as an organization func-

PIPELINE INTEGRITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (PIMS) PIMS is a database system for managing subsea pipeline anomalies and inspection data with Integrity Management input, analysis and corrective action control. Subsea Asset managers do not have the time to filter through the mass of pipeline inspection data and reports to see where the anomalies are and the Integrity Manager doesn’t have time to .

A - Simple Gas Lift System, B-Continuous Gas Lift, C- Intermittent Gas Lift Fig.1 Gas Lift Types (Ibrahim, 2007)(Salahshoor, Zakeri and Haghighat Sefat, 2013) 2.1 Advantages of Gas Lift Gas Lift is most preferred due to following advantages ('Ga if C i -flow gas lift Intermittent-flow gas if', 2018). i- Maximum liquid production

Pipeline Integrity Management System By Markus Ruhe and Frank Rathlev 1 Introduction In order to ensure that gas transport lines operate with as little damage and environmental impact as possible while still being economic, Thyssengas GmbH operates a Pipeline Integrity Management (PIM) system. The task of PIM is to determine the overall process for the integrity assessment of lines and thus to .