CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGR· IM RELEASE AS SANITIZED .

2y ago
14 Views
3 Downloads
931.91 KB
20 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Kaleb Stephen
Transcription

Director ofCentralIntelligenceCIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGR· iMRELEASE AS SANITIZEDSoviet Space ProgramsNational InteUigence EstimateVolume 1-Key Judgmentsand Executive Summary .Top SecretNf 11-1-85/

'i.Tef3 BeretNIE ll-l-85JSOVIET SPACE PROGRAMSVOlUME I-KEY JUDGMENTSAND EXECUTIVE SUMMARYInformation available as of 5 December 1985was used in the preparation of this Estimate.which was approved bv the National ForeignIntelligence Board on that date.Tep Sserat

THIS ESTIMATE IS ISSUED BY THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRALINTELLIGENCE.THE NATIONAL FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE BOARD CONCURS,EXCEPT AS NOTED IN THE TEXT.The following intelligence organizations participated in the preparation of theEstimate:The Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National SecurityAgency, and the intelligence organization of the Department of State.Also Participating:The Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence, Department of the ArmyThe Director of Naval Intelligence, Department of the NavyThe Assistant Chief of Staff, Intelligence, Deportment of the Air ForceThe Director of Intelligence, Headquarters, Marine Corps

PREFACEThis Estimate is published in two volumes. Volume I includes theKey Judgments and Executive Summary. Volume II is a comprehensivediscussion of Soviet space programs.vTGS sggg Ba/ 'I ps;c,e'

Tap 6ee stFigure 1Soviet Space Expenditures, 1965-85Billion 1983 US S30Support01965707580ScctclVI .Top gGnllt85

TeF' 6ceactKEY JUDGMENTSA continuing trend toward the increasing use of space assets by Sovietmilitary forces is clearly foreshadowed by the large investments in spacesystems R&D of the past few years. We can expect to see the payoff bythe early 1990s in terms of expanded access to space for performance ofa variety of missions. In the long term, space systems would probably bean integral part of any advanced-technology strategic defense systemthe Soviets might develop and deploy, and we expect antisatellite(ASAT) capabilities-improved by then-to be a critical aspect of Sovietefforts to counter any space-based elements of a potential future USstrategic defense.Ultimately, it is the sheer size and breadth of the Soviets' space effort that gives them their greatest potential in the competition forleadership in space. The magnitude of the effort compensates for muchof the inefficiency and technological deficiency that characterizes manyindividual Soviet programs. Furthermore, we cannot clearly account for'all of the Soviet space support facilities in existence and underconstruction-design bureaus, production facilities, launchpads, andcontrol facilities-with known programs. Although some or even all ofthis additional capacity may be designated for relatively . benign"programs that we have not been able to detect, the possibility remainsthat developments of a more ominous nature await us, such as theeventual deployment of weapons in space. Another possibility is thatmore of the older facilities and launch vehicles will be phased out' thanwe have projected . Finally, it appears that the Soviets are providingthemselves with the necessary support structure to ensure that they willbe well positioned to make timely deployments of space systems basedon any major breakthrough in one or more areas in which we know theyare working-antisubmarine warfare (ASW}, ASA T, or ballistic missiledefense (BMD) technologies, for example.We estimate that in 1985 the costs of Soviet space programs areabout 26 billion. Between 1980 and 1983, space costs nearly doubled,largely because of the costs associated with the development of theheavy-lift launch vehicle. Since then, space programs have continued toexpand at a rate of nearly 10 percent annually (see figure 1). This levelof investment is equivalent to about 1.5 percent of the Soviet grossnational product. The costs of military space activities alone are aboutthe same as those for strategic offensive forces. Since 1980, mannedspace programs have accounted for the bulk of increased expendituresand now amount to about One-fourth of the total costs of Soviet spaceTGS &33(} 86/lTep &aerat

Tap Seerstefforts. The Soviets are making extensive use of man in space forperforming research on critical military problems[We expect the largest increases to be noted inmanned activities and communications programs over the next fiveyears.JThe Soviets currently have a dedicated antisatellite interceptor andseveral other potential means to conduct ASA T operations. The orbitalinterceptor system presents a significant threat to all low-altitude USintelligence and military support satellites but its effectiveness is limitedby operational considerations and reliability. The Soviets' overall ASATcapabilities are somewhat limited, especially against satellites at higheraltitudes. We expect the Soviets to make significant improvements intheir ASA T capabilities, particularly in the area of directed-energytechnologies.The Soviets use their space assets today principally to performtraditional military support missions of communications, targeting,reconnaissance and surveillance, navigation, meteorology, and geodesy;militarily, these functions will remain the most important space activities in the near term, and most of the future developments we projectare extensions of these basic military support missions. In addition, theSoviet space effort supports civilian-oriented functions, such as telecommunications, remote sensing for agricultural and resource development,and scientific research.The military importance of Soviet space assets has increasedgreatly in the past 10 years, and the Soviets increasingly value these assets for support of military operations in a crisis or conflict, especiallyfor reconnaissance and targeting, communications, and navigation. Wejudge that, although the USSR is not at present overly dependent onspace systems for the effective conduct of military operations, satellitesbecome more important to the Soviets as the level of conflict increases.In addition, as more near-real-time monitoring capabilities are introduced (including manneq platforms), we expect that Soviet spacesystems will become increasingly important in providing information onrapidly developing situations to both national-level decisionmakers andmilitary commanders.Soviet efforts to acquire space technology wi!I increase in the faceof intensified military-technological competition with the United States.The proliferation of commercial space capabilities among the Westernallies and the establishment of cooperative space programs will widenthe available targets for Soviet access. Thr()ugh such efforts, a vastamount of valuable space-related technology already has been andcontinues to be obtained directly from US sources and US allies inWestern Europe and Japan. Critically sought-after missile and spaceTG& &:l6Q 8&/ r2

Tal' ee1 attechnologies include those related to development of space-based laserand other directed-energy weapons and antimissile defense systems.Open source publications, particularly NASA documents and NASAfunded contractor studies, constitute the largest and most importantsource of US space technology.The scope and direction of the Soviet space effort, the extensive efforts to acquire Western space technology, and the military nature ofSoviet manned space experiments are ultimately disquieting. Althoughwe judge that overall the Soviets remain at a significant technologicaldisadvantage relative to the United States in space, we are concernedabout the possibility that they may be heading toward a major militaryadvance. Our concern stems primarily from the considerable uncertainties we face in several key areas: the Soviet efforts in advanced weapontechnologies, the purpose of the Soviet use of man in space, and thegreat increase in the infrastructure the Soviets are providing. for spacesystem operations. Their efforts in these areas could lead to importantmilitary advantages.3Top Scu cl

Top 6ce:ratEXECUTIVE SUMMARY1. Over 70 percent of Soviet space launches are formilitary purposes at present and have been for someyears; most of the remainder serve both military andcivil purposes. The Soviets are increasing their spaceefforts in overall expenditures, R&D, booster size andpayload capabilities, and number and types of satellites in orbit. Much of the increase is due to thegrowing use of satellite systems to support militaryoperations. We have identified 15 Soviet space systemsthat are probably in development and are likely toundergo testing in the next 10 years (see figure 2).2. The Soviet approach to space differs from the USapproach. In general, the Soviets conduct their activities in space in much the same way they conduct alltheir military activities. Space assets are integratedinto the various elements of Soviet military forces andare not subordinated to a separate entity such as aspace command. In the Soviet view, any major conflicton Earth cannot be conducted without involvingspace. Soviet military precepts, such as the importanceof surprise, the necessity of confusing the enemy, andthe use of overwhelming force to ure mditaryobjectives, are also likely to apply to Soviet militaryoperations in space during a war. -· · .of a new ocean research satellite for naval support such as locating ice-free routes and facilitating Arctic submarine operations. The Sovietshave also increased the use and sophistication oftheir military comsat networks.-Improved Readiness Posture. These developments have improved the Soviet posture withregard to augmentation needs in a crisis. Whereas two years ago, about 40 additional satelliteswould have been needed to fill out existingpeacetime networks in order to support crisis orwartime needs, today's requirement probably hasbeen reduced to 20 to 30 because of the largernumber of satellites and upgraded systems nowon orbit. In addition, demonstration of a capability to store on orbit some communications, navigation, and reconnaissance satellites indicates Soviet intentions to reduce even further their needto launch additional spacecraft in a crisis.- Timeliness. The Soviets have taken preliminarysteps to improve the timeliness of their space---based reconnaissance.c· . .lBy the 1990s, theSoviets will be capable of rera'ying some satellitederived information to field commanders withinabout two hours of collection by reconnaissancesatellites, a capability essential for combat conditions in which mobility characterizes the forcesof both sides.A. Key Developments3. Key developments since the 1983 NIE on TheSoviet Space Program point to a continuing determined Soviet effort to acquire a mature and robust setof capabilities in space:- Expanded Satellite Network. The Soviets haveincreased the number of operational satellitestypically on orbit to over 140. This larger andmore sophisticated network is more capable ofsupporting Soviet military forces and operationsthan the 110-satellite network of just two yearsago.- Survivabilitu. We have noted some Soviet efforts to improve the survivability of Soviet spacecontrol facilities. Launch facilities and the maincontrol facilities are fixed, however, and remainvulnerable to attack.·- New Capabilities. The Soviets have furtherbroadened satellite support to military missions,including reconnaissance, communications, targeting, and other purposes. Notev:rorthy developments include the introduction of a prototypenear-real-time imaging system and development-Long-Duration Manned Spaceflight. Sovietcosmonauts set a world record of 237 continuousdays in space in a single flight, part of the longterm Soviet effort to establish a permanentmanned presence in space. The Soviets alsodemonstrated the capability to bring the damaged Salyut 7 spacecraft back into service, with5-TG& §33Q 8§/{Tep beeret

Top 6cc: elFigure 2Soviet Space Systems Likely To Be in DevelopmentInitial prototypetestingFull operationalcapabilityLimifed operationalcapability Submarine detectionLarge space stationSpace tugAdvanced military communicationsSubmarine laser communications "Space-based laser ASA T- -. ·:: .-.·. . .- :. Multispectral earth resourcesNew-generation: low-altitude ELINTShuttle orbiterGeosynchronous meteorological (GOMS)Satellite data rebyPotok data transmissionSpaceplaneGeosynchronous launch detectionModular space station.Ocean research. . ."'. : .". .-·. ·.:-· .-.- .-.-.-:.9293.":.-.-:Electro-optical imaging satellite (IMSA1)Global navigation satellite (GLONASS)198384858786the cosmonauts performing repairs on orbit. Theseexperiences will provide a basis for long-duration,continuously manned, earth-orbiting space stations,and possibly manned lunaror interplanetary missions.-4. Other important developments represent significant Soviet investment in R&D and infrastructure to6saae SS/l8990919495support more diverse and ambitious space programs inthe 1990s:B. Space Support Activities-TC588Progress continues on major new constructionprojects at space support facilities. Significantexpansion has occurred at a number of majordesign and production facilities in the past fewyears; in some cases, we observed expansion inexcess of identified projects. The capacity of thespace control network to deal with increasing

Tep 6 c stcvolumes of data, and its efficiency and timeliness, are being improved with the introduction ofmore computer capabilities. Extensive construction continues at Soviet space launch centers,especially at Tyuratam, which supports allmanned launches and launches of heavy payloads. The preparation of three launchsites forthe new heavy-lift launch vehicle indicates plansfor its extensive use (see figure 3).-JC. Manned Space Efforts5. Observed efforts in the area of manned spaceoperations illustrate several aspects of the Sovietapproach:-Military applications have characterizedr]proportion of Soviet manne spaceactivity.cDevelopment work continues on the newmedium- and heavy-lift launch vehicles, andfurther progress has been made in the development of a reusable space transportation system (amanned space shuttle). The Soviet shuttle program probably began in 1974, and the shuttleorbiter is similar to the US space shuttle, theresult of extensive ongoing efforts on the Pa.rt ofthe Soviets to acquire Western space technology(see figure 4). Initial flight testing of the mediumlift launch vehicle began in April 1985; weanticipate the first test flights of the heavy-liftlaunch vehicle in 1986. The Soviet shuttle willprobably first go into orbit in 1987, when construction of a suitable launchpad is completed.These launch vehicles will support a wide varietyof military and civil missions, and will providekey support for the establishment of larger spacestations and a continuous manned presence inspace. The heavy-lift launch capability will alsogive the Soviets the option of orbiting largepower sources and other potential componentsfor future space weapons.JConductingsuch tests on manned platforms overcomes someof the limitations for the Soviets of remoteinstrumentation and highly complex, unmanned,space-based prototypes.- Prestige is another key aspect Scientific achievements in space are important to the Sovietleadership for both domestic and internationalpolitical purposes. Moscow is apparently willingto invest substantial resources to maintain highvisibility in this area. The announced Soviet goalof a continuously manned space station in nearearth orbit is undoubtedly motiva.ted in part byprestige considerations.- The Soviets continue to increase their use ofcommunications satellites for their military, government, and civil communications. Projecteddevelopments will have the advantages of significantly improving the speed, flexibility, and reliability of command and control and other communications. The Soviets are actively pursuing acomprehensive program for geostationary communications systems that could include satellitesthat serve more than one communications network, intersatellite crosslinking, and laser communications links.6. Since 1971, Soviet space stations have been inorbit nearly continuously, periodically occupied bySoviet cosmonauts. Within three years, and possibly assoon as next year, the Soviets will have established apermanent manned presence in space. The comprehensive Soviet manned program will probably consistof. several functionally interrelated componentsincluding:-Initially, a modular space station for a crew ofthree to 12 persons.·E-Later on, a large space base for a crew of 12 to 20persons.-J7TGS 533g 8G/'A reusable space shuttle orbiter, which will belaunched by the SL- W heavy-lift launch vehicle.T9p SgEFal

Tsfl e ere I8TC& 66Q B / rTep 5cu cl

.'-A spaceplane which, if developed, will probablybe launched by the SL-X-16 medium-lift launchvehicle.-Two ground-based high-energy lasers at the Saryshagan test range with potential ASA Tcapabilities.7. Much of the Soviet manned space effort is notfully explainable; nor can we be certain how muchprogress the Soviets have made. It is unclear whetherthey envision man's role in space as limited to R&Dfunctions, or whether they intend to give him somemajor function in eventual operational systems. Weare skeptical that the Soviets will find an effective andefficient way to put man in the loop in space for spacewarfare systems, but, on the other hand, we have onlya very limited understanding of what their systemconcepts look like.- The technological capability, using active electronic warfare (EW), to attempt to interfere withenemy space systems. We have no direct evidence that enables us to judge the extent of thesecapabilities. We believe, however, that the Soviets intend to use active EW to attempt tointerfere with some space systems: Potential Soviet active EW platforms include many fixed,transportable, and mobile transmitters; however,we have no evidence of Soviet equipment ororganizations with an ASAT EW mission. Thereis an alternative view that evidence is insufficientto support the judgment of Soviet intent to useactive EW against satellites. 1D. Space Warfare Capabilities8. The Soviets use their space assets today principally to perform traditional military support missions ofcommunications, targeting, reconnaissance and surveillance, navigation, meteorology, and geodesy; militarily, these functions will remain the most importantspace activities in the near term, and most of thefuture developments we project are extensions of thesebasic military support missions. In a crisis or conflict,Soviet space assets would enhance existing terrestrialcapabilities, especially by collecting and transmittingcritical data in a more timely manner. Examplesinclude warning of US ballistic missile launches andavailability of reconnaissance data on strategic targetsin near real time. In some cases, Soviet space systemscomprise unique capabilities, including providing realtime targeting information on Western surface navalforces to Soviet naval combatants, and providingcontinuity for long-distance communications.10. Current Soviet ASAT capabilities are limitedand fall short of meeting the apparent requirement tobe able to deny enemy use of space in time of war:- The orbital interceptor, the Galosh. and the lasershave the potential to destroy or interfere withsatellites in near-Earth orbit. Electronic warfarecurrently represents the only potential threat tounD,rotected satellites in higher orbits. SomeICBMs, with modifications, and some spaceboosters have the capability to be used againstsatellites at all altitudes, but we doubt the Sovietswould use them in such a role.-The orbital interceptor, because it is nonnuclear,would be used at lower levels of conflict than anuclear ASAT weapon. The orbital interceptorsystem presents a significant threat to all lowaltitude US intelligence and military supportsatellites. However, it has a demonstrated successrate of about 60 percent, it is susceptible toevasive maneuvers or other countermeasures]and it co

CIA HISTORICAL REVIEW PROGR· iM RELEASE AS SANITIZED Soviet Space Programs National InteUigence Estimate Volume 1-Key Judgments and Executive Summary . Top Secret . The Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, and the

Related Documents:

Latest IIA exams,latest IIA-CIA-PART2 dumps,IIA-CIA-PART2 pdf,IIA-CIA-PART2 vce,IIA-CIA-PART2 dumps,IIA-CIA-PART2 exam questions,IIA-CIA-PART2 new questions,IIA-CIA-PART2 actual tests,IIA-CIA-PART2 practice tests,IIA-CIA-PA

9. CiA DS-204-1 V1.1, DBT Service Spezifikation, Februar 1996 10. CiA DS-204-2 V1.1, DBT Protokoll Spezifikation, Februar 1996 11. CiA DS-205-1 V1.1, LMT Service Spezifikation, Februar 1996 12. CiA DS-205-2 V1.1, LMT Protokoll Spezifikation, Februar 1996 13. CiA DS-206 V1.1, Empfohlene Namenskonventionen für die Schichten, Februar 1996 14.

Programme: SYBSc Semester: III Course : Calculus & Analog Electronics Course Code : SPHT302 Teaching Scheme (Hrs/Week) Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) 40 marks End Semester Examination Total L T P C CIA-1 CIA-2 CIA-3 CIA-4 Lab Written 3 - 3 15 15 10 - 60 100 Max. Time, End Sem

27 CIA FINANCIAL REPORTS i. CIA Account Statement ii. CIA Budget Analysis and Projections 2019-2020 Appendix 14 & 15 iii. CIA Inventory Appendix 16 (Financial reports have not yet been provided by the FAI and will be presented at the Plenary meeting). 28 AWARD OF MONTGOLFIER DIPLOMAS –

A. Review the open systems interconnect network model. B. Identify the network operating costs. C. Determine the business purpose of the network. D. Map the network software and hardware products into their respective layers. Answer: C . . CIA-I Dumps, CIA-I Braindumps, CIA-I Real

Course: Food and Dairy Microbiology Course Code: XMI602 Teaching Scheme (Hrs/Week) Continuous Internal Assessment (CIA) End Semester Examination Total L T P C CIA-1 CIA-2 . Banwart G. J. (1989). Basic Food microbiology, 2nd Edn. Chapman and Hall. International Thompson Publishing.

Re se ña del Pro gra ma de Li cen cia tu ra en Fí si ca en la UASLP en su 50 Aniver sa rio José M. Ca bre ra Tru j i ll o 1 Fa cul tad d e Cien cias , Univer sidad Autón oma de S an Lu is Potosí La fí si ca, a di fe ren cia de la ma te má ti ca, no es una cien cia

SAMPLE CONTENT 1 Word Meaning bashfulness (n) shyness or discomfort with other people be a pussy-cat (phrase) here, laze around indoors beckoned (v) invited or guided someone with a gesture of a hand behold (v) see; witness betokening (v) be a sign of blanc-mange (n) almond flavoured milk pudding blunt (adj) here, saying something honestly without trying to be polite