US Army On The Mexican Border: A Historical Perspective

2y ago
15 Views
2 Downloads
1.10 MB
110 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Kaydence Vann
Transcription

OP 22The US Army on theMexican Border:A HistoricalPerspectiveMatt M. MatthewsThe Long War SeriesOccasional Paper 22Combat Studies Institute PressFort Leavenworth, Kansas

OP 22The US Army on theMexican Border:A HistoricalPerspectiveMatt M. MatthewsCombat Studies Institute PressFort Leavenworth, Kansas

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataMatthews, Matt, 1959The U.S. Army on the Mexican border : a historical perspective / by Matt M.Matthews.p. cm. -- (Long war series occasional paper ; 22)Includes bibliographical references.1. Mexican-American Border Region--History, Military. 2. Mexican-AmericanBorder Region--History. 3. United States. Army--History. 4. Geopolitics--UnitedStates--History. 5. Geopolitics--Mexico--History. 6. Intervention (Internationallaw) 7. National security--United States--History. 8. Border patrols--UnitedStates. 9. United States--Foreign relations--Mexico. 10. Mexico--Foreignrelations--United States. I. Title. II. Series.F786.M44 2007355.00972’1--dc222007027330CSI Press publications cover a variety of military historytopics. The views expressed in this CSI Press publicationare those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of theDepartment of the Army or the Department of Defense. Afull list of CSI Press publications, many of them availablefor downloading, can be found at p.The seal of the Combat Studies Institute authenticates this document as anofficial publication of the CSI. It is prohibited to use CSI’s official seal on anyrepublication of this material without the written permission of the Directorof CSI.This is the Official U.S. Government editionof this publication and is herein identified tocertify its authenticity. Use of the 978-0-16078903-8 ISBN prefix is for U.S. GovernmentPrinting Office Official Editions only. TheSuperintendent of Documents of the U.S.Government Printing Office requests that any reprinted edition clearly belabeled as a copy of the authentic work with a new ISBN.For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing OfficeInternet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512-1800; DC area (202) 512-1800Fax: (202) 512-2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402-0001I S B N 978-0-16-078903-8

ForewordSince the mid-19th century, the United States has frequently employedthe US Army on its southern border to perform various roles in support ofthe Nation—from outright war, to patrolling the border, to chasing banditswhile securing persons and property on both sides of the border, and mostrecently to supporting civil law enforcement and antidrug efforts. Eventssince 9/11, such as the recent deployment of National Guard Soldiers tothe Mexican border, are only the latest manifestation of this long tradition.This 22nd Occasional Paper in the Combat Studies Institute (CSI) LongWar Series, The US Army on the Mexican Border: A Historical Perspective,by CSI historian Matt M. Matthews, reviews the lengthy history of theUS Army on the Mexican border and highlights recurring themes that arerelevant to today’s ongoing border security mission.Between 1846 and the early decades of the 20th century, the US Armycarried out its security missions under a variety of hardships imposed bythe massive length and ruggedness of the border. The shortage of soldiers topolice the new and oft-disputed border also proved especially problematic.Mexican domestic politics and US-Mexican international relations greatlyaffected the Army’s operations. Since the 1920s, the Army’s role has beendramatically different, ranging from noninvolvement to varied formsof support to local, state, and Federal civilian agencies. Mr. Matthews’narrative brings to light these complexities and makes for compellingreading.The ongoing, post-9/11 debate over the military’s role in securing ourNation’s southern border makes this paper important reading for today’sSoldiers. While current and future missions will not mirror those of thepast, the historical record is replete with insights and lessons learnedfrom the Army’s past that are timely and relevant today. CSI—The PastIs Prologue!Timothy R. ReeseColonel, ArmorDirector, Combat Studies Instituteiii

ContentsPageForeword. iiiIntroduction.1Chapter 1. Setting the Stage: The Army of Observation and Armyof Occupation on the Mexican Border, 1845–46.9The Texas Revolution.9The Army of Observation.12The US Army of Occupation.13Taylor’s March to the Rio Grande.14Chapter 2. The US Army and Mexican Border Security, 1850–61.27Border Geography.27Deployment of US Army Forces on the MexicanBorder.28Captain James H. Callahan and the Burning of PiedrasNegras.31Cortina’s War.33Summary.38Chapter 3. The US Army and Mexican Border Security,1865–1910.41Major General Sheridan and Napoleon III on the RioGrande.41Deployment of Army Forces on the Mexican Border,1870–86.46Colonel Ranald S. Mackenzie’s Raid.48Brigadier General Edward Ord, William R. “PecosBill” Shafter, and Porfirio Diaz.51Summary.53Chapter 4. The US Army and Mexican Border Security, 1911–17.59Diaz.59Huerta, Carranza, Villa, and Zapata.60Deployment of US Army Forces on the MexicanBorder.61Major General Frederick Funston and the Plan of SanDiego. 62Pershing’s Expedition and the Return of the Plan ofSan Diego Plotters.67Summary.69

Chapter 5. The US Army and Mexican Border Security,1919–Present.73Deployment of US Army Forces on the MexicanBorder and the Battle of Juarez, 1919. 73Immigration Issues and Operation WETBACK.76The US Army and Mexican Border 91About the Author.101Maps1. Transcontinental Treaty Line.22. Taylor’s Army on the Rio Grande.203. Major Comanche Trail Into Mexico.294. Forts in Texas.475. The 2,000-Mile US-Mexican Border.64vi

IntroductionI have the honor to inform you, that I have arrived onthe Line as near as has been ascertained that divides thetwo States of North America and that of Mexico, with twohundred Troops of the U.S. Army.Brevet Major Bennet Riley to his Excellency theGovernor of Santa Fe, 10 July 1829On 25 January 1825, US Senator Thomas Hart Benton of Missouri roseon the floor of the Senate to speak in favor of a bill that would mark a road“from the frontier of Missouri to the confines of New Mexico.” Missouritraders had been using this road, known as the Santa Fe Trail, to movetheir caravans of goods from western Missouri to Santa Fe, New Mexico,since 1821. Benton told his fellow senators, “To the people of the West, Iknow this trade to be an object of the greatest value. . . . The Mexicans aretheir neighbors, and the only foreign power with whom they can trade.”1In fact, since gaining independence from Spain in 1821, Mexico, too, hadpromoted a strong trade relationship between its remote provinces in thenorth and the frontier states of the American West. By 1825, the newlyfederalized Republic of Mexico2 and the United States considered an overland trade route to be mutually beneficial.The bill to survey the Santa Fe Trail was signed into law by PresidentJames Monroe on 3 March 1825. The new law stipulated that the roadwould be marked from western Missouri to the Arkansas River. Since thesigning of the Transcontinental Treaty3 with Spain in 1819, the westernportion of the Arkansas River constituted a portion of the boundary linebetween Mexico and the United States (see map 1). The new law alsoauthorized commissioners to make treaties with the various Indian tribesalong the trail and to conduct negotiations with the Mexican Governmentfor marking the trail to Santa Fe, New Mexico. Senator Benton was certainthe new trail would become “a highway between nations.”4In the spring of 1829, at the behest of President Andrew Jackson, theUS Army ordered a small contingent of soldiers to move from JeffersonBarracks to Cantonment Leavenworth to begin providing security for theMissouri traders making the dangerous trek to and from Santa Fe, NewMexico. The assignment fell to Brevet Major Bennet Riley and fourcompanies of the 6th Regiment, US Infantry. While a mounted force wouldcertainly have been preferable, at that time the US Army contained only6,332 soldiers, and the cavalry arm was nonexistent.5 On 18 April, Brigadier

TranscontinentalTreaty Line, aAltaCaliforniaRed RiverArizonaNew foGrandrveRieUSMexicoTranscontinentalTreaty Line, 1819iarnfoalifCGulf ofMexicoMap 1. Transcontinental Treaty Line.General Henry Atkinson, Commander of the Western Department, issuedthe following order:Notice is hereby given, that a detachment of two hundredtroops, under the command of Maj. [Bennet] Riley,of the 6th Regt. Infy., will proceed from CantonmentLeavenworth, about the first of June, on the Santa Fe road,to the Arkansas [R]iver, for the protection of caravansengaged in commercial intercourse with the provinces ofNew Mexico.The detachment will halt at some position on the Arkansas,for the return of the caravans, till some time in October,when it will fall back to the frontier.6On 11 June, the US Army contingent linked up with 79 Missouritraders and 38 wagons at Round Grove. On 9 July, Riley’s commandarrived near Chouteau’s Island7 (located near present-day Lakin, Kansas),a location he considered to be on the border between the United States and

Mexico. From Cantonment Leavenworth, the total distance marched wasapproximately 400 miles.Eager to continue on to Santa Fe, the traders crossed the ArkansasRiver the following day. Before leaving, however, the leader of the caravan,Charles Bent, delivered a letter to Riley in which he expressed the traders’“sincere regret that you are not permitted to accompany us farther yetunder the assurance that if danger threatens you will at all times be readyto march to our defence we rest comparatively secure.” On the morning of11 July, Riley crossed to the south side of the Arkansas River to deliver aletter to Bent, which he was to carry to the Governor of Santa Fe:I have the honor to inform you, that I have arrived onthe Line as near as has been ascertained that divides thetwo States of North America and that of Mexico, withtwo hundred Troops of the U.S. Army. The object forwhich I was sent is the protection of the trade from ourCountry, to the State over which you Preside, it is hopedtherefore that your excellency will feel an equal interestwith the United States, and give it all the protectionand assistance in your power whilst in your territory,and if possible to send an escort for the protection ofthe different companies of Traders to the lines as abovementioned or take some suitable means, to prevent Indiandepredations. They inform me that the Savages haveheretofore been very outrageous on both sides of theLine, and my Government have determined to protect iton their side—I hope therefore that the Trade is of suchimportance to Mexico that will induce your excellencyto adopt a similar course. I shall remain in or about thisplace until the return of the Company of Traders that arethe bearers of this Communication when I should be veryglad to see some of the Officers and Soldiers of yourexcellencies Government.8With Riley’s letter in hand, the traders started their long unescortedjourney to Santa Fe. Riley assured the traders he would wait until 10October for their return.It did not take long for the Missouri traders to run into trouble. Sixmiles south of the Arkansas, Bent’s caravan was attacked by hundreds ofKiowa Indians. A quick counterattack by Bent and the firing of a smallcannon saved the caravan from complete annihilation. Terrified by the

cannon fire, the Kiowa warriors fell back into an overwatch position in thesurrounding hills. Bent quickly ordered his men to dig in and sent ridersracing back to the Arkansas to request aid from Riley and his men.9When the riders arrived at 1830 with news of the situation, Rileydecided without hesitation to rescue the caravan. That night, Riley andthe men of the 6th Infantry Regiment crossed the Arkansas into Mexico,marking the first but certainly not the last time a US Army incursion intoMexican territory would be warranted. At 2300, Riley and his soldiersarrived at Bent’s defensive position. The next morning, finding the Indiansgone, the caravan began moving south. Riley escorted the traders for 2 daysand then returned to the Arkansas where the soldiers awaited its return.10For nearly 3 months, Riley and the soldiers of the 6th Infantry waitedfor the return of the traders. On the morning of 11 October, Riley gave thecommand for the firing of the signal gun and ordered his four companies tobegin the long journey back to Cantonment Leavenworth. Three miles intotheir march home, Riley and his small command were overtaken by fastriding traders. They announced that the caravan was rapidly approachingthe Arkansas River with almost 300 people and a large herd of livestock.Traveling with the caravan were approximately 90 traders, a Spanishfamily, and close to a dozen Spaniards recently exiled from Mexico. ToRiley’s great relief, the entire procession was guarded by a large contingentof Mexican soldiers under the command of Colonel Jose Antonio Viscarra.Riley recalled:I ordered a halt, pitched my tents, and waited for theirarrival, which was on the next day, the 12th. When the Col.got nearly across the river, I had my line formed parallelto it, and received him with presented arms. . . . After hehad passed, I dismissed the battalion, and received andwelcomed him to the territory of the United States; andinvited him and the Secretary of the State of Santa Fe tomy tent, where we exchanged civilities.11At some point during the official festivities, the Mexican dignitarieshanded Major Riley a letter from New Mexico Governor Jose Ano Chavez,in which he stated he had “arranged with . . . Viscarra to help the merchantsof North America in their departure from this territory.” He also informedRiley that he placed “himself completely” at the major’s disposal. On13 July, both Riley and Viscarra headed for home. “Not without mutualprofessions of friendship,” Riley reported, “and hopes of seeing each otherin the Spanish country next year.”12

The meeting between the US Army and the Mexican Army on theArkansas River was dignified and cordial and certainly did not revealany hidden animosity between the two nations. Although Riley had beenforced to make a limited incursion into Mexican territory to rescue thetraders, the Mexican Government issued no complaint. In the end, Rileywas convinced that the entire caravan “would have been destroyed and thepeople killed if it had not been for the Mexican escort.”13 The encounterbetween Riley and Viscarra temporarily ushered in a spirit of goodwillbetween the two republics.In May 2006, President George W. Bush announced plans to mobilizemore than 6,000 Army National Guard Soldiers to assist the Border Patrolin its efforts to secure the US border with Mexico. Now, 177 years afterRiley’s mission, concerns over possible terrorist infiltration, increasingcriminal drug activity, and an alarming influx of illegal immigrants to theUnited States by way of Mexico have again called for the deployment ofUS troops to the border. Despite the apparent need for better policing,the announcement was not met with unanimous approval. As history hasshown, deployment of US soldiers to the border is often controversial,and the use of military personnel to support law enforcement is at bestcontentious.Since the US seizure of half of the Mexican territory during thewar with Mexico, the two countries have experienced an ambivalentrelationship regarding their shared border. Years of cross-border raids byIndians, bandits, and revolutionaries added to the enmity. Historically,the difficulties were compounded by a growing ethnic disdain on bothsides and by the continual instability of the Mexican Government. In thisclimate of unrest, it is not surprising that the US Army has played a majorrole in policing the border.This occasional paper is a concise overview of the history of the USArmy’s involvement along the Mexican border and offers a fundamentalunderstanding of problems associated with such a mission. Furthermore,it demonstrates how the historic themes addressed—disapproving publicreaction, Mexican governmental instability, and insufficient US militarypersonnel to effectively secure the expansive boundary—are still prevalenttoday.Chapter 1 addresses the Texas Revolution, the annexation of Texas,and the resulting diplomatic deterioration between the United States and

Mexico. It also examines the mission of the Army of Observation andArmy of Occupation on the Mexican border from 1845 to 1846 and thecircumstances that led to the Mexican-American War. This conflict andthe resulting treaties defined the border and set the stage for the Army’ssubsequent missions there. The hostility that emerged during and after thewar lingers and complicates the relationship between the two countries tothis day.Chapter 2 examines the first attempts by the US Army to secure theMexican border. Interestingly, these initial efforts were designed to stopIndian raids into Mexico. The Army’s attempts were undermined by aninsufficient number of soldiers, which made patrolling the expansiveborder difficult. Static defensive positions proved likewise ineffective instopping the influx of raiders. The chapter also explores the role of the TexasRangers and the US Army in protecting the border as well as problemsregarding Army involvement with state and local law enforcement. Theburning of Piedras Negras, Mexico, by Texas Ranger Captain James H.Callahan as detailed in this chapter provides an example of the challengesencountered by the US Army when deal

law) 7. National security--United States--History. 8. Border patrols--United States. 9. United States--Foreign relations--Mexico. 10. Mexico--Foreign relations--United States. I. Title. II. Series. F786.M44 2007 355.00972’1--dc22. 2007027330. CSI Press publications cover a variety of mil

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

eric c. newman air force 2001-2009 george f. giehrl navy 1941-1945 f conrad f. wahl army 1952-1954 sidney albrecht . william c. westley jr. army 1954-1956 roland l. winters navy 1945-1946 michael a. skowronski army . joseph a. rajnisz army 1966-1971 james l. gsell army army army army army navy army navy air force army army

Army Materiel Command (AMC) http://www.amc.army.mil/ AMCOM -Redstone Arsenal http://www.redstone.army.mil/ Association of the US Army (AUSA) http://www.ausa.org/ Army Center for Military History http://www.army.mil/cmh-pg/ Army Training Support Ctr http://www.atsc.army.mil/ CECOM http://www.monmouth.army.mil