NCDOT Project Development Timeline
NCDOT Project Development TimelineRob Hanson, P.E.Eastern Project Development Section HeadOctober 16, 2014
How do concurrence points fit into theoverall process? Why is it important to reach concurrenceon schedule? Requests for additional information orstudy How does this affect NCDOT? What happens between concurrencepoints?2
OVERALL PROCESS
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Long-Range Planning
Strategic Highway Corridors
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Scheduling Expectation of delivery National Congress Map-21 State Goals
Annual Funding Balance /-10% Variance onalTestDivisionTestAnnual BudgetsTestTestTestTestTestTest18
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Design
Design
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Right of Way
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
Construction
Long-Range Planning Programming (funding) NEPA/SEPA (Planning/EnvironmentalDocument) Design Right of Way Construction
How do concurrence pointsfit in the process?
NEPA/SEPA(Planning/EnvironmentalDocument)
Concurrence Point #1: Purpose and NeedConcurrence Point #2: Alternatives to be studiedConcurrence Point #2A: Bridging decisionsConcurrence Point #3: Least EnvironmentallyDamaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) Concurrence Point #4: Avoidance and Minimization4A: Alignment4B: 30% Hydraulic Design4C: Permit Drawing
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2A
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2AWidening & New LocationCP 4A & 4B R/W delivery
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2AWidening & New LocationCP 4A R/W delivery
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2AWidening & New LocationCP 4A R/W deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2AWidening & New LocationCP 4A R/W deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3Widening & New LocationFinal Document R/W delivery
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2AWidening & New LocationCP 4A R/W deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3Widening & New LocationFinal Document R/W deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3
New LocationCP 3 R/W delivery (surveys can begin)CP 1CP 2CP 2AWidening & New LocationCP 4A R/W deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3Widening & New LocationFinal Document R/W deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3
4ADesHrg4BPlansR/WFinal NEPA Document
Widening & New LocationPermit Letting delivery
Widening & New LocationPermit Letting deliveryCP 1CP 2CP 2ACP 3CP 4ACP 4BCP 4C
4CFinal PlansPermitUtility RelocationRight of Way AcquisitionConst
Requests for additional information orstudy How does this affect NCDOT? What happens between concurrencepoints?52
Concurrence Point 1Purpose and Need CapacitySafetyEconomic DevelopmentTruck TrafficStrategic CorridorsHurricane Evac.Includes Study Area
Concurrence Point 1Purpose and Need Capacity Safety Basis for designationComprehensive Transportation PlanHurricane Evac. Traffic projectionsLocal government dataStrategic Corridors Local government and industry dataTruck Traffic 3-year accident analysis, review of statistical dataEconomic Development Traffic projectionsHurricane evacuation modelMobility/Travel Time Delay, queue lengths
Concurrence Point 1Purpose and NeedOther prep: Aerial base map with proposed study area Internal Scoping/External Scoping For EIS – Public involvement
CapacitySafetyEconomic DevelopmentTruck TrafficStrategic CorridorHurricane Evac
Concurrence Point 2Detailed Study Alternates
Concurrence Point 2 - PreparationDetailed Study AlternatesNew Location GIS level environmental dataReview of modal optionsFunctional alignments/costs – computer modelingPublic InvolvementWidening Environmental field infoPrelim. DesignCapacity analysisPublic Involvement
More alternatives
# of alternativesWidening , New locationPublic reactionAdd’l design, cost estimatesenvir. Review/impacts calcs
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions
Concurrence Point 2A: PrepPrelim. design completedWetlands delineatedHydraulic analysis completed for structuresCost estimatesHistoric eligibility determinedProtected species reviews conductedCommunity impact assessment completedEliminate certain alternates?New Location Build condition traffic projections/capacity analysisMeeting planning Field meeting, possible office meeting to follow
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions
Concurrence Point 2A: Bridging Decisions
Unable to eliminate alternatives?Disagree on bridge lengths?
Concurrence Point 3: Selection of the LEDPA
Concurrence Point 3: Prep.ection of the LEDPA Finalize prelim. designs & environmental impactsNEPA document preparation, review, distributionPublic Hearing – prep, conduct, comment periodPost Hearing meeting/review of public commentsReview of agency comments on DEIS/EA, etc.
Delays if team cannot concur,Elevation?
Concurrence Point 4A:Avoidance & Minimization
Concurrence Point 4A: Prep.Avoidance & Minimization Review selected alignment for further minimization Revise environmental data based on comments fromagencies at CP 3 and from DEIS/EA comments
Substantial minimization atprevious steps404 jurisdictionalminimization/other resources
Concurrence Point 4B & 4C 30% Hydraulic Review Permit Drawings
Concurrence Point 4B & 4C 30% Hydraulic Review Permit Drawings
Rob Hanson, P.E.(919) 707-6024rhanson@ncdot.gov
Pages/Merger.aspx
Eastern Project Development Section Head October 16, 2014 . NCDOT Project Development Timeline How do concurrence points fit into the overall process? Why is it important to reach concurrence on schedule? . PowerPoint
Division Construction Staff Engineer Greg Johnston 336-903-9125 gjohnston@ncdot.gov Division Project Team Lead Ramie Shaw, PE 336-903-9134 rashaw@ncdot.gov Division Bridge Project Manager Joe Laws, PE 336-903-9138 jlaws@ncdot.gov Division Contract Engineer Kenny Heavner, PE
TimeLine Business Systems 40 years of history - more than 350 customers - one goal: to become the market-leading ERP system for foundries and die-casting companies Business Systems TimeLine TimeLine Gebauer GmbH, German Head Office in Solingen TimeLine Financials GmbH & Co. KG, located near Dresden www.timeline.info TimeLine TimeLine.
Administer NCDOT drone integration, including planning, implementing, and reporting prog-ress and results to leadership. Advise and approve all UAS procurement at NCDOT. Educate NCDOT personnel about the UAS poli-cy, training opportunities, and fleet require-ments. Train and certify NCDOT personnel as UAS op-erators.
NCDOT CUSTOMER SERVICE SURVEY 2020-21 NCDOT Project 2022-24 FHWA/NC/2022-24 July 2022 Emeline McCaleb Joy Davis, MPA, PMP Daniel Findley, Ph.D., PE
other state departments of transportation ()s has identified relevant practices DOT that help to inform NCDOT as it pursues future resilience-related actions, such as vulnerability assessments or pilot studies. The development of the NCDOT Strategy was heavily guided by engagement activities through online
PAGE A Georgetown Project Review and Approval Process 25 * B Special Permit Flow Chart, Timeline, and Checklist 27 * C Variance Flow Chart, Timeline, and Checklist 28 * D Notice of Intent Flow Chart, Timeline, and Checklist 30 * E Definitive Approval Flow Chart, Timeline, and Checklist 32 * F Site Plan Approval Flow Chart, Timeline, and Checklist 34 *
WEB TRANSFORMATION PROJECT . Project timeline . High level timeline and project plan . Timeline — publ
Albert Woodfox, 68, has been in solitary confinement since his conviction in 1972 for the murder of a prison guard. He has always maintained his innocence. There is no physical evidence to link him to the crime; the conviction relied pri-marily on the testimony of an eye witness who received favours, including his re- lease, for cooperation. Albert’s conviction has been overturned three .
