2030 - Home AIA Professional

2y ago
27 Views
2 Downloads
7.94 MB
38 Pages
Last View : 21d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Hayden Brunner
Transcription

2030BY THENUMBERSThe 2018 summary ofthe AIA 2030 Commitment

CONTENTSExecutive Summary. 2The 2030 Commitment in context. 3Section 1. 2030 signatories are leaders. 4Reporting firms in 2018. 5New firms in 2018. 9pEUI by state. 10Global footprint.11Local impact. 12Award winners.132030 in practice: Payette.14Section 2. Practical solutions, today.15Projects meeting and exceeding the mark. 16Projected operational cost savings.17Typical savings. 18Impact of existing buildings. 19Impact of climate zones on pEUI savings. 20Impact of energy modeling on pEUI savings.21Impact of small firms.22Published September 2019Section 3. Urgency is increasing faster than the market is responding.23Rapid growth in the built environment.24Progress to 2030 goals.25Percent of signatories who report.26GSF shrinks. 27Percent of modeled projects.28Section 4. Driving exponential change.29Four strategies. 302030 in practice: RB B Architects, Inc. 31Section 5. Forward, together.32Taking the next steps. 33Appendix: Methodology. 34Resources & references. 35Acknowledgments. 36

EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe question of combating climate change through the builtenvironment has long ceased to be one of “whether?” “why?” or“when?” Instead, the real question is “who?”Architects, engineers, and owners all have critical roles to playin fighting climate change and the opportunity to becomeleaders in the movement. Every single one of us can—andshould—align our work with efforts to fight climate change. Thisrecognition of individual responsibility underpinned the passageof a resolution for “urgent and sustained climate action” byan overwhelming margin of voting members at the 2019 AIAConference on Architecture.1The 2030 Commitment, at its core, is a response to ourclimate crisis and a platform for architects, engineers,and owners—whether in small practices or internationalorganizations—to demonstrate climate action through energyefficient design. Signatories of the 2030 Commitment reportannual progress against increasingly aggressive targets forenergy reduction in projects, culminating in a goal of zero netcarbon buildings by 2030.For 2018 alone, 252 firms reported data to the 2030Commitment’s Design Data Exchange (DDx) on projects totalingnearly 3 billion square feet across 92 countries. These projectsaccounted for an overall predicted energy use (pEUI) reductionequivalent to avoiding 17.7 million metric tons of CO2 emissions—and operating savings of more than 3.3 billion—relative to2030 baseline-equivalent buildings.*Nevertheless, it’s clear that we must double down on effortsto meet our 2030 targets. This year’s average weighted pEUIreduction—46%—is the best in 2030 history, but less than thecurrent 70% target. To reach a zero net carbon future, we mustvastly increase the number of 2030 signatories and the project’sperformance data by working together to: Increase incorporation of energy modeling especially duringearly design phases to set reduction targets and focus onincorporating passive design strategies. In 2018, modeledprojects reported about 25% better pEUI reduction thannon-modeled projects, but only about half of all reportedprojects were modeled—leaving untapped a powerful tool todrive design and improve performance. Embrace both on- and off-site renewable energy in design.Innovative design and passive strategies alone cannot bringevery project to zero net carbon emissions. Advocate for more stringent codes that continue to pushthe bottom up. For instance, universal adoption of theZERO Code, championed by Architecture 2030 and AIA,could make zero net carbon buildings the norm. Encourage more signatories and collaborators to sharetheir data. Reporting project data is the only way to showaccountability and progress toward the 2030 goals. Italso helps firm leaders better understand the performanceand impact of their portfolios in the industry context andstrengthens the case for zero net carbon solutions.*See appendix for the method used to calculate these savings.A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S2

E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y / The 2030 Commitment in contextIn 2018, 2030 Commitment projects accounted for an annualoverall energy savings equivalent to avoiding 17.7 million MTCO2e. Over a year, this equates to:3.717.7MILLION MT CO ²emillion passenger vehicles2removed from the road for oneyear. In context, 3.7 millionis the estimated numberof registered private andcommercial vehicles in thestate of Georgia.320.8million acres of forestequivalent carbonsequestration.2.1million homes powered by electricity and natural gas or 3 millionhomes powered by electricity for one year—the approximate equivalentto powering all housing units in Maryland for 1 year.4A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S3

SECTION 1.2030SIGNATORIESARE LEADERS

L E A D E R S / Reporting firms in 2018In 2018, 252 signatories—45%of all 2030 signatories—reportednearly 3 billion square feet ofproject data. The data presentsa striking picture of climateleadership globally, locally, andacross the profession.T H E S E 1 6 F I R M S A C H I E V E D A 7 0 % O R G R E AT E Rp E U I S AV I N G S A C R O S S T H E I R E N T I R E P O R T F O L I O !Arkin Tilt ArchitectsMcLennan DesignBergmeyer AssociatesPlacetailorCOULSONPyatok Architecture Urban DesignehddSam Rodell Architects AIAGreen HammerTBDAKaplan Thompson ArchitectsVermont Integrated ArchitectureLehrer Architects LA, Inc.YGH ArchitectureLPA, Inc.ZeroEnergy DesignA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S5

L E A D E R S / Reporting firms in 2018THESE FIRMS REPORTED PROJECT DATA IN 2018.100 Fold Studio5G Studio CollaborativeAC MartinAdrian Smith Gordon Gill ArchitectureAlbert Kahn Associates, Inc.AlliianceAnkrom Moisan Architects, Inc.Ann Beha ArchitectsARC/Architectural Resources Cambridge, Inc.ArchimaniaArchitectural Nexus, Inc.Arkin Tilt ArchitectsArrowstreetAshley McGraw ArchitectsAtelier TenAyers Saint GrossBallingerBAR ArchitectsBassetti ArchitectsBergmeyer AssociatesBeyer Blinder Belle Architects & Planners, LLPbKL Architecture LLCBKV GroupBlair Mui Dowd Architects, PCBLT ArchitectsBNIM ArchitectsBohlin Cywinski JacksonBora ArchitectsBoulder Associates, Inc.Braun and Steidl ArchitectsA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S26Brininstool Lynch, Ltd.Brooks Scarpa Architects, Inc.Browning Day Mullins DierdorfBruner/Cott & AssociatesBuroHappold EngineeringBWBRCallisonRTKLCambridgeSevenCannon DesignCarleton Hart ArchitectureCBT ArchitectureClark NexsenCO ArchitectsColdham & Hartman ArchitectsCOOKFOX ArchitectsCooper CarryCorganCOULSONCS&PCTA Architects EngineersCuningham Group Architecture, Inc.Dake Wells ArchitectureDattner ArchitectsDavid Baker ArchitectsDavis Partnership ArchitectsDBR Engineering Consultants, Inc.Dekker/Perich/SabatiniDesign Collective, Inc.designLAB architectsDewberry93NUMBEROF FIRMSREPORTINGBY FIRM SIZE77Firm size1–910–4950–9955100 DIALOGDIGSAUDiMella ShafferDLR GroupDRAW Architecture Urban DesignDS Architecture, LLCDSK Architects PlannersDWL Architects Planners Inc.EhddEhrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney ArchitectsElkus Manfredi ArchitectsEllenzweigElness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc.ELS Architecture and Urban Designemersion DESIGN6

L E A D E R S / Reporting firms in 2018Engberg Anderson ArchitectsEnglish Associates Architects, Inc.Ennead ArchitectsEskew Dumez RippleEwingColeEYPFarr AssociatesFeldman ArchitectureFFA Architecture and Interiors, Inc.Finegold Alexander ArchitectsFlad ArchitectsFrederick Frederick ArchitectsFXFOWLEgbA Architecture & PlanningGBD Architects IncorporatedGenslerGFFGLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.Goody ClancyGould EvansGRECGreen HammerGresham, Smith and PartnersGrimm and ParkerGSBS ArchitectsGuidon DesignHackerHahnfeld Hoffer StanfordHanbury Evans Wright Vlattas CompanyHandel Architects, LLPHarley Ellis DevereauxA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R SHarrisonKornberg ArchitectsHartshorne Plunkard ArchitectureHastings Architecture Associates, LLCHDRHelix Architecture DesignHennebery Eddy Architects, Inc.HGA Architects and EngineersHigh Plains ArchitectsHKSHMC ArchitectsHMFH Architects, Inc.HOK Inc.Holst ArchitectureHord Coplan MachtHoweler Yoon Architecture, LLPICON Architecture, Inc.IKM IncorporatedIn Balance Green ConsultingJacobs Global Buildings DesignJer Greene, AIA CPHCJohn Ronan ArchitectsJohnson Roberts Associates, Inc.Jones Studio, Inc.Jones Whitsett ArchitectsJSA, Inc.Kaplan Thompson ArchitectsKieranTimberlakeKipnis Architecture PlanningKirkseyKOO LLCKrueck Sexton ArchitectsKuhn Riddle ArchitectsLake Flato ArchitectsLandon Bone Baker Architects (LBBA)Leddy Maytum Stacy ArchitectsLeers Weinzapfel AssociatesLegat ArchitectsLehrer Architects LA, Inc.LHB, Inc.Little Divsersified Architectural ConsultingLMN ArchitectsLord Aeck SargentLPA, Inc.LSW ArchitectsMaclay ArchitectsMahlum ArchitectsMarlene Imirzian & Associates ArchitectsMazzettiMcGranahan ArchitectsMcLennan DesignMiller Dyer Spears, Inc.MithunMJMAmode associatesMoody NolanMoseley ArchitectsMSRNAC ArchitectureNBBJNeumann Monson ArchitectsOlson KundigOPN Architects7

L E A D E R S / Reporting firms in 2018Opsis ArchitectureOrcutt WinslowOtak, Inc.Overland Partners ArchitectsPagePappageorge Haymes PartnersPATH ArchitecturePaul Poirier Associates ArchitectsPayettePei Cobb Freed & Partners Architects LLCPelli Clarke Pelli ArchitectsPerkins WillPerkins EastmanPickard ChiltonPlacetailorPrecipitate, PLLCPyatok Architecture Urban DesignQuattrocchi Kwok ArchitectsQuinn Evans ArchitectsRatcliffRATIO ArchitectsRB B Architects, Inc.richärd bauerRMW architecture & interiorsRNT ArchitectsRobert A.M. Stern ArchitectsRoss Barney ArchitectsRSP ArchitectsA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R SRVK Architects, Inc.Sam Rodell Architects AIASasaki AssociatesSchadler Selnau Associates PCSERA ArchitectsSerena Sturm ArchitectsShepley BulfinchSHKS ArchitectsSHP Leading Designsiegel & strain architectsSmith Seckman Reid, Inc.SmithGroupJJRSmith-Miller Hawkinson ArchitectsSMMASnow Kreilich ArchitectsSolomon Cordwell BuenzSOM (Skidmore Owings & Merrill)Speranza ArchitectureSRG Partnership, Inc.Stantec ArchitectureSteinberg ArchitectsSterner DesignStudio MaSTUDIOS architectureTBDAThe Beck GroupThe Green Engineer, Inc.The Miller Hull PartnershipThe Sheward PartnershipThe SLAM CollaborativeThornton ThomasettiTK-ArchitectureTLC Engineering SolutionsTLCD ArchitectureTreanorHLTrivers AssociatesUrban Design PerspectivesUrbanWorks, Ltd.UtileValerio Dewalt Train AssociatesVanderweil EngineersVermont Integrated ArchitectureVMDO ArchitectsWBRC Architects/EngineersWDG ArchitectureWeber ThompsonWight & CompanyWilliam Rawn AssociatesWLC Architects, Inc.Wright Heerema ArchitectsWRNS StudioWRTYost Grube HallZeroEnergy DesignZGF Architects LLPZiger/Snead8

L E A D E R S / New firms in 2018THESE FIRMS JOINED THE 2030 COMMITMENT IN 2018.100 Fold StudioAnmahian Winton ArchitectsAntunovich AssociatesBBGM Architects & Interiors, Inc.Behnisch ArchitektenBen Rosenblum StudiobKL Architecture LLCBKSK ArchitectsBKV GroupBlackney Hayes ArchitectsBrininstool LynchCambridgeSevenCarleton Hart ArchitectureCorganCowart Group PCdbHMSDBR Engineering Consultants, Inc.DesignStudiosNUSDMAC ArchitectureDominek Architecture, LLCDS Architecture, LLCDuda Paine ArchitectsEllipsis ArchitectureEncore Sustainable DesignEXPFelix DeVito ArchitectFennick McCredie Architecture, Ltd.A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R SFergus Garber YoungFFKR ArchitectsFGP Atelier International LLCgbA Architecture & PlanningGLHN Architects & Engineers, Inc.GO LogicHart HowertonHBRA ArchitectsHKS ArchitectsHoweler Yoon Architecture, LLPJohn Ronan ArchitectsJohnson Roberts Associates, Inc.Jurassic StudioKBZ ArchitectsKOO LLCKSS ArchitectsKuhn Riddle ArchitectsLorcan O’Herlihy ArchitectsMachado and Silvetti AssociatesMcLennan DesignMEPCE, Inc.MJMANative Son Design StudioOdile Compagnon ArchitectOptima, Inc.Otak, Inc.Oudens Ello Architecture, LLCPappageorge Haymes PartnersPATH ArchitecturePieri ArchitectsPlacetailorPrellwitz Chilinski AssociatesPyatok Architecture Urban DesignRDG Planning & DesignRoss Architecture, Inc.Semple Brown Design, PCSillman Wright ArchitectsSté Yaba and Kumba Intl.Stantec ArchitectureStudio Dwell ArchitectsStudio Gang ArchitectsStudio Twenty Seven ArchitectureSTUDIO-E Architecture, PCSWBRTHRIVE CollaborativeTLCD ArchitectureUtileWalker ArchitectsWalter Street ArchitectureWeston C. Burrer, ArchitectWheeler Kearns ArchitectsWright Heerema Architects9

L E A D E R S / pEUI by state50%47%44%50%53%35%2 0 3 0 S I G N AT O R I E S A R EL E A D E R S I N C O M B AT I N GC L I M AT E C H A N G E T H R O U G HT H E B U I LT E N V I R O N M E N 8%50%47%49%46%43%49%45%In the US alone, they reported 1.7 billionsquare feet—a total of 15,603 projects—touching every US state, the District ofColumbia, and Puerto Rico. Californialeads the nation in total number ofprojects and reporting pEUI savings.41%44%56%43%43%47% 42%48%56%42%46%38%42%48%47%38%44% 43%41%Number of projects1–9948%100–199200–49943%500 48%6,638Interior K1K2K232M3K4K5KNumber of projects6K7K8K0M250M500M750M1000M1250M1500MGSFThe data shown on the map excludes interior only projects and shows only wholebuilding projects (residential and non-residential).A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S10

L E A D E R S / Global footprintA GLOBAL FOOTPRINTSignatories also reported 2,396 projectsoutside of the US, totaling 1.1 billionsquare feet, or 35% of total GSF, across92 countries.Number of projects1–249250–499500–749750 N/A1,197Interior 71M400600Number of projects800100012000M200M400M600M800M1000MGSFThe US is only added to the map for reference and not included in the bar graphs.A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S11

L E A D E R S / Local impact“My local 2030 ‘huddle’ is a form of authentic support fromothers at signatory firms striving to design to reach the 2030Commitment targets. It reminds me that we are all committedtogether to respond to climate urgency.”Gwen Fuertes, AIA, LEED AP BD CLMSAA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R SFrom Boston and New York, to Pittsburgh and Chicago, to Seattle and San Francisco, 2030 signatories areworking to mobilize collaboration on a regional and local scale. These groups—whether informal peer-topeer support networks or more formal AIA committees—are building a culture that promotes energy andemissions savings in design. In 2018, these groups worked to push zoning incentives for energy-efficientbuildings, advocate for code improvements, support renewable energy, and participate in pilot programs.Utilities and state-based energy organizations also recognize the value of 2030. In 2018, Energy Trustof Oregon piloted an internship program to assist five Oregon-based firms in reporting projects andhitting energy targets. As a result of the program, for these five firms the weighted average EUI reductionimproved from 41% in 2017 to 43% in 2018 and the number of reported projects more than tripled.12

L E A D E R S / Award winnersA I A A R C H I T E C T U R E F I R M AWA R D R E C I P I E N T S A N D S I G N AT O R I E SPayette – 2019Snow Kreilich Architects – 20182030 signatories are provingthat high-level technicalperformance is compatible withaward-winning design. In 2018,more than 70% of AIA awardwinning projects were designedby one or more 2030 signatoryfirms. Since the inception of theCOTE Top Ten Awards in 1997,every firm to receive the awardhas also been a 2030 signatory.For the sixth consecutive year,the AIA Architecture Firm Awardrecipient was a 2030 signatory.Leddy Maytum Stacy Architects – 2017LMN Architects – 2016Ehrlich Architects – 2015Eskew Dumez Ripple – 2014A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S13

L E A D E R S / 2030 in practicePAY E T T EAs AIA’s 2019 Architecture Firm Award recipient, Boston-based Payette has earned a reputation for its innovative, complexdesign work focused on academic science and health care facilities—building types known for high energy demands. The firmhas long worked to integrate performance with design, which made joining the 2030 Commitment in 2011 an easy choice—and one that has helped the firm further embed sustainable design throughout its practice.“It’s not just a few exemplar projects,” explains Andrea Love, AIA, principal and director of building science. “Everyoneunderstands that we as a firm have made the commitment, and so in every project, they now have a responsibility to try tomeet that target. It also helps us build energy literacy across the board and makes energy use a key part of how we talk aboutprojects both internally and to clients.”Payette has also shared the firm’s experience in operationalizing the 2030 Commitment with area peers via the Boston 2030discussion group and mentoring. “We’ll all be better if we’re all participating in the 2030 Commitment,” says Love. “It’s a healthysense of competition that pushes us to design high-performing, beautiful buildings and move toward the 2030 targets.”A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S14

SECTION 2.PRACTICALSOLUTIONS,TODAY

S O L U T I O N S / Projects meeting and exceeding the mark712 projects165 firms4,526 projects131 zero netenergy projectswere designed to meet the 70% pEUIreduction target.by 130 firms were designed to meet the 25%lighting power density (LPD) reduction target.reported projects that were designed to meet the70% pEUI reduction target.(achieving 100% or higher pEUI reduction)were reported by 57 firms.A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S16

S O L U T I O N S / Projected operational cost savings 3.3 BILLION/YEARAlong with stunning design and exceptional performance, ownersand clients demand return on investment. In this respect, the 2030Commitment delivers. In 2018, 2030 projects represented energysavings of more than 3.3 billion over the baseline equivalent.See appendix for the method used to calculate these savings.A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S17

S O L U T I O N S / Typical savingsC O M M E R C I A L S AV I N G SR E S I D E N T I A L S AV I N G SA typical 100,000-square-foot commercial office building inNew York City designed to perform 70% better than the2030 baseline would yield the following annual savings:Meanwhile, a typical 2,500-square-foot single-family home inMobile, Alabama, designed to perform 70% better thanthe 2030 baseline would yield the following annual savings: 2,154 MWh 22.6 MWh 199,600 2,050 520 9less energyin projected energy cost savingsmetric tons CO²e reductionA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R Sless energyin projected energy cost savingsmetric tons of CO²e reduction18

S O L U T I O N S / Impact of existing buildingsConstruction typeM A J O R R E N O VAT I O N S O FNON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGSP E R F O R M S I M I L A R LY T O N E WCONTRIBUTIONS IN TERMS OFENERGY EFFICIENCYCategory name7,116Interior onlyMajor renovationof existing ior onlyNew 0K4K6K8KConstruction typeMajor renovationof existing buildingNumber of projectsCategory name29%Interior only45%Non-residential42%ResidentialNew construction27%Interior only45%Non-residentialConstruction typeNew constructionInterior only10%20%30%pEUI % Savings223MNon-residentialResidential0407MInterior onlyMajor renovationof existing building41%ResidentialCategory name10M40%50%Recognizing the importance ofimproving our existing building stock,the 2030 Commitment began trackingmajor renovations of existing buildingsin 2018. The results are compelling:At 45% pEUI, major renovations ofnonresidential building perform similarlyto new contributions in terms ofenergy efficiency.Existing buildings represent aconsiderable opportunity to minimize theeffects of the built environment on climatechange by reducing carbon emissionsfor building material manufacture,transportation, and al0M500M1000M1500M2000MGSFA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S19

S O L U T I O N S / Impact of climate zones on pEUI savingsPORTFOLIOAVERAGE2030 TARGET2 0 3 0 TA R G E T S A R E A C H I E VA B L EIN ALL ZONES1A VERY HOT–HUMIDWhile every climate zone presents its ownchallenges to designers and architects, 2030projects show that meeting and exceedingperformance standards is possible.2A HOT–HUMID2B HOT–DRY3A WARM–HUMID3B WARM–DRY3C WARM–MARINE4A MIXED–HUMID4B MIXED–DRY4C WARM–MARINEKey5A COOL–HUMIDLowerextreme5B reme6A COLD–HUMID6B COLD–DRY7 VERY COLD0102030405060708090100110pEUI % savingsA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S20

S O L U T I O N S / Impact of energy modeling on pEUI savingsCURRENT 2030 TARGET2030 TARGET IN 2020ALL USE TYPES CAN MEET THEC U R R E N T 2 0 3 0 TA R G E T S, B U TO N LY W I T H E N E R G Y M O D E L I N GmodeledOfficeK-12 educationnon-modeledThe 2018 data shows that most use types willbe able to meet the more challenging 2020target: 80% pEUI reduction. Energy modelingwill become even more important as thetargets become more challenging in 2020,2025, and 2030.modelednon-modeledmodeledHigher non-modeled0102030405060708090100110120pEUI % savingsA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S21

S O L U T I O N S / Impact of small firmsS M A L L F I R M S AV E R A G E60% pEUI REDUCTION60%60%pEUI % Savings50%46%49%46%40%While large firms contributed 90% oftotal GSF included in this year’s analysis,the 2030 Commitment is relevant forfirms of all sizes. In 2018, 80% of thefirms meeting the 70% pEUI target havefewer than 50 people, and firms withfewer than 10 people have the highestaverage percent pEUI reduction,a whopping 60%!30%20%10%283 Projects4,777,864 GSF1,432 Projects130,581,793 GSF1,595 Projects166,193,849 GSF14,689 Projects2,591,436,550 GSF1–910–4950–99100 0%Firm sizeA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S22

SECTION 3.URGENCY ISINCREASINGFASTER THANTHE MARKET ISRESPONDING

U R G E N C Y / Rapid growth in the built environment75%40%2.5 billion2.5 trillionshare of global greenhouse gas emissions attributableto the urban built environmentestimated increase in number of people living inurban areas by 2050A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R Sshare of global greenhouse gas emissions thatcome from existing buildingsestimated GSF of new construction by 2060The United Nations hasprojected that urban areas willadd 2.5 billion people by 2050,moving from 55% of the world’spopulation today to 68%.6 Thefight against climate changewill play out in our cities andtheir buildings as we double thecurrent global building stock—making zero net carbon newconstruction an imperative,not an option.24

U R G E N C Y / Progress to 2030 goals100%10080%80pEUI % 4%46%20%200%20112012201320142015YearA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S402016201720180OUR PROGRESS IS NOTK E E P I N G PA C E W I T H T H EGROWING URGENCY ANDI M PA C T S O F C L I M AT E C H A N G EIn 2006, Architecture 2030 set anambitious roadmap to achieve carbonneutrality in new buildings by 2030with incremental targets increasingevery five years.Although the average pEUI increasedto 46% this year (the highest ever)from 44 in the prior year, this rate ofimprovement is unlikely to achieve 100%zero net carbon design by 2030 withoutexponential change. Along with continuedincorporation of proven energy-efficientdesign strategies, we will also need toincrease our use of energy modeling andincorporate on- and off-site renewableenergy to reach these targets.25

U R G E N C Y / Percent of signatories who reportFEWER THAN HALF OF ALLS I G N AT O R I E S A R E R E P O R T I N G ,WHERE DOES YOURF I R M S TA N D ?60050014%11%Number of firms4009%9%3002%10%Seventy-nine new firms joined the 2030Commitment in 2018, bringing the totalnumber of active signatories to 549. Of those,252 submitted portfolios in 2018 comparedto 212 in 2017, an 18% increase. On average,45% of signatories that joined in a given yearare reporting, regardless of when they joinedthe 2030 Commitment. Encouragingly, sixfirms that joined the commitment in early2019 were able to report before the 2018reporting deadline.12%20010%55%11%Year joined2019201810055%2017201620150Signatories in 2018A I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R SReported in 2018Before 201526

U R G E N C Y / GSF shrinksGSF DROPS 4%304M18K15K459MFor the first time, reported GSF shrunkcompared to the previous year, dipping 4% tojust under 3 billion GSF. At the same time, thetotal number of projects increased to 17,999—7% higher than 2017.2018GSF7,8357,319Number of 0MKeyInterior 102016201720182016GSF2017GSF0KYear2,028MA I A 2 0 3 0 BY T H E N U M B E R S2,302M27

U R G E N C Y / Percent of modeled projectsM O D E L E D P R O J E C T S A R E F L ATAT A R O U N D 5 0 %In 2018, on average, modeled projectshave an approximately 25% higher pEUIreduction than non-modeled projects. Yet,the percentage of projects being modeledhas not significantly changed since 2017,hovering around 50% for both the number ofprojects and the percentage of total GSF. Thisrepresents a significant missed opportunity.Reporting year201620172018Total number of records along status energy model57%43%Total use type total area along status energy model65%35%Total number of records along status energy model50%50%Total use type total area along status energy model54%46%Total number of records along status energy model49%51%Total use type total area along status energy ledModeledA I A 2 0

DRAW Architecture Urban Design DS Architecture, LLC DSK Architects Planners DWL Architects Planners Inc. Ehdd Ehrlich Yanai Rhee Chaney Architects Elkus Manfredi Architects Ellenzweig Elness Swenson Graham Architects, Inc. ELS Architecture and Urban Design emersion DESIGN 55 26 NUMBER OF FIRMS REPORTING BY FIRM SIZE 77 93 Firm size 1–9 .

Related Documents:

AIA Global Bond Fund 8 Dana Asing AIA Asia Opportunity Fund AIA New Horizon Fund AIA Asian Debt Fund AIA International High Dividend Fund . The performance of our main funds - AIA Fixed Income, AIA Balanced Fund and AIA Equity PLUS Fund - was particularly commendable, having

Graphic Design · Vadim Gershman Diagrams · Vadim Gershman & Andrea J. Johnson Copy Editor Linda Lee AIA Equity and the Future of Architecture (EQFA) Steering Group Emily Grandstaff-Rice, FAIA Annelise Pitts, AIA Karen Williams, AIA AIA EQFA Committee 2018 Keshika De Saram, Assoc. AIA Kimberly Dowdell, AIA, NOMA Emily Grandstaff-Rice, FAIA, Chair

Young Architects Forum ‘20-’21 Community Director. Sarah Page, AIA. AIA Chattanooga. AIA Tennessee Emerging Professional Committee & AIA Tennessee Board of . Photo credit: Spillman Farmer Architects. AIA PA EPiC Firm Go to menti.com. AIA Tennessee

Education Systems (AIA/CES). Credit(s) earned on completion of this program will be reported to AIA/CES for AIA members. Certi!cates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request. This program is registered with AIA/CES for continuing professional educat

George Metzger AIA, Chair . Dan Peruzzi AIA Deborah Fennick AIA . BSA/AIA Audit Committee Dan Peruzzi AIA John Cinkala . Dave Sullivan MaryBeth Celorior . BSA FOUNDATION BUSINESS COMMITTEES Foundation Finance Committee Eric Krauss – Chair Ted Touloukian AIA Kenneth Willis Laura Wernick FAIA Bud Ris Greg Bialecki

Jasper stone Company Janet sonnichsen neWly registereD Jeff Chadwick, AIA Jeff Dolezal, AIA eric Maxwell, AIA in memory Lynn Vermeer, AIA In conjunction with Grassroots, AIA Omaha received an AIA National Component excellence Award in the area of Component outreach Communication: overall Program for Natural Capitalism: Fueling the Next Industrial

Institute of Architects (AIA) Continuing Education Session (CES) for AIA members. Certificates of Completion for both AIA members and non-AIA members are available upon request. This course is registered with AIA CES for continuing professional education. As such, it does not include content

an assignment. (See USPTO forms PTO/AIA/05, PTO/AIA/06, PTO/AIA/07, PTO/AIA/10and PTO/AIA/11,all of which are explained below.) Unlike in non ‐ reissue nonprovisional patent applications, submission of the inventor’s oath or ReissueFiling Guide for ApplicationsFiled on/after 9/16/2012 Page 3