OPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016OPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORTLEARJETMODEL 45(LEARJET 40, 45, 70 AND 75)GRUPO DE AVALIAÇÃO DE AERONAVES – GAABRAZILIAN AIRCRAFT EVALUATION GROUPAGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE AVIAÇÃO CIVILRIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZILORIGINAL – JULY 22, 2016ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 1
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016Revision ControlREVISIONDATEOriginalJuly 22, 2016ANAC, Rio de JaneiroHIGHLIGHTS OF CHANGEOriginal reportOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 2
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016ApprovalAudir Mendes de Assunção FilhoTraining Organizations Certification BranchDepartment of Flight StandardsANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 3
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016Table of ContentsREVISION CONTROL . 2APPROVAL . 3TABLE OF CONTENTS . 41GENERAL . 51.1EVALUATION TEAM . 5ACRONYMS . 62INTRODUCTION . 72.1BACKGROUND . 72.2OBJECTIVE. 72.3PURPOSE. 72.4APPLICABILITY . 72.5CANCELATION . 83PILOT TYPE RATING . 94MASTER DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS (MDR) . 105OPERATOR DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS (ODR) . 116SPECIFICATIONS FOR TRAINING, CHECKING AND CURRENCY . 126.1AIRMEN MINIMUM EXPERIENCE FOR INITIAL FLIGHT TRAINING . 126.2AIRMEN MINIMUM QUALIFICATION FOR DIFFERENCES TRAINING . 126.3TRAINING AREA OF SPECIAL EMPHASIS (TASE). 126.4TRAINING FOR SEAT DEPENDENT TASKS. . 137COMPLIANCE TO RBHA 91 AND RBAC 135 . 158TECHNICAL PUBLICATIONS. 168.1MASTER MINIMUM EQUIPMENT LIST - MMEL . 168.2AIRPLANE FLIGHT MANUAL - AFM . 16APPENDIX 1 ACCEPTABLE OPERATOR DIFFERENCE REQUIREMENTS(ODR) TABLES . 17APPENDIX 2 RBHA 91 AND RBAC 135 COMPLIANCE CHECKLISTS . 98APPENDIX 3 PILOT TRAINING OUTLINES . 105ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 4
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20161 General1.1 Evaluation Team1.1.1. First issue team memberNameTaskOrganizationGuilherme dos Santos MacedoEvaluator InspectorANACANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 5
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016Acronyms AEO – All Engine OperativeANAC – Agência Nacional de Aviação Civil (Brazilian National CivilAviation Agency)ATO – Approved Training OrganizationFAA – Federal Aviation AdministrationFFS – Full Flight SimulatorFSB – Flight Standardization Board (FAA)FSTD – Flight Simulator Training DeviceFTD – Flight Training DeviceFTO – Flight Training OrganizationGGCP – Gerência Técnica de Certificação de Produto (ANAC ProductCertification Branch)MCR – Master Common RequirementsMDR – Master Difference RequirementsMMC – Multi Crew CoordinationMMEL – Master Minimum Equipment ListODR – Operator Differences RequirementsPF – Pilot FlyingPIC – Pilot in CommandPNF – Pilot Not FlyingRBAC – Regulamento Brasileiro de Aviação CivilRBHA – Regulamento Brasileiro de Homologação AeronáuticaSAR – Superintendência de Aeronavegabilidade (ANAC AirworthinessDepartment)TCDS – Type Certificate Data SheetANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 6
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20162 Introduction2.1 BackgroundThis evaluation was conducted by documentation analysis using theinformation provided by the manufacturer and the determinations of the Learjet45 Flight Standardization Board (FSB) Report Revision 1, issued by the FederalAviation Administration (FAA) on May 20th, 2014.In case more detailed information is required, refer to the later FSB Reportmentioned above.2.2 ObjectiveThis report presents ANAC collection of results obtained from theoperational evaluations of Learjet Model 45 aircraft, commercially known asLearjet 40, 45, 70 and 75. Unless otherwise specified, Learjet 45 means theLearjet 40, 45, 70 and 75. Learjet 45, Learjet 40, Learjet 70 and Learjet 75 canalso be referred as LR-45, LR-40, LR-70 and LR-75 respectively.2.3 PurposeThe purpose of this report is to:a. Define the Pilot Type Rating assigned for the Learjet 45 aircraft;b. Recommend the requirements for initial, transition, upgrade andrecurrent training, checking and currency applicable to flight crew for theLearjet 45, and functionalities;c. Provide the Master Differences Requirements (MDR) for crews requiringdifferences qualification for mixed-fleet-flying;d. Provide an acceptable Operator Differences Requirements (ODR);e. Describe the required Flight Simulation Training Device (FSTD) for crewtraining and checking.2.4 ApplicabilityThis report is applicable to:ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 7
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016a. Brazilian operators of Learjet 45 aircraft – identified as Learjet 40, Learjet45, Learjet 70 and Learjet 75 in the ANAC Type Certificate Data Sheet(TCDS) EA-1999T08 – who operate under RBHA 91 and RBAC 135rules;b. Approved Training Organizations certified under RBAC 142 (Type RatingTraining Organizations - TRTO);c. ANAC Inspectors related to certification and/or safety oversight of Learjet45 aircraft operation.2.5 CancelationNot Applicable.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 8
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20163 Pilot Type RatingThe specific pilot type rating assigned to the Learjet 45 aircraft isdesignated "LR45".Airmen who wish to pursue any specific type rating must comply with therequirements established on subparagraph 61.213(a)(1) of RBAC 61.The GAA recommends the update of ANAC type rating list (InstruçãoSuplementar – IS 61-004) with the following information:Table 1 - Pilot Type RatingX – Type Rating (Airplane) – Land – Multi Pilot Operation, Multi Engine (All Engines)AircraftType RatingManufacturerRMKModelNameANACLearjet 45/40Learjet(Bombardier)Learjet 45 SeriesDLR45Learjet 75/70ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 9
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20164 Master Difference Requirements (MDR)The Master Difference Requirements matrix for the Learjet 45 aircraft isshown in Table 2. These provisions are applied when there are differencesbetween models which affect crew knowledge, skills, or abilities related to flightsafety (e.g., Level A or greater differences) for training, checking and currency,respectively, according to IAC 121-1009.Table 2 - Master Difference RequirementsFROM AIRCRAFTTO AIRCRAFTLearjet 45 Learjet 40 Learjet 75 Learjet 70Learjet 45----A/A/AC/C/CC/C/CLearjet 40A/A/A----C/C/CC/C/CLearjet 75C/C/CC/C/C----A/A/ALearjet 70C/C/CC/C/CA/A/A----ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 10
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20165 Operator Difference Requirements (ODR)Each operator of a mixed fleet of Learjet 45, 40, 75 and 70 shall produce itsown ODR, as required by IAC 121-1009.For operators flying the Learjet 45, 40, 75 and 70 aircraft, the ODR tables inAppendix 1 have been found acceptable by the ANAC GAA and may be usedby the POI for approval of an operator with the specific aircraft equipage.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 11
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20166 Specifications for Training, Checking and CurrencySpecifications for initial, transition, upgrade, or recurrent training, checkingand currency are detailed on FSB Report mentioned above.For information about Differences Training for Learjet 40/45 base to Learjet70/75 and for Learjet 70/75 base to Learjet 40/45 and for information about PilotInitial Type Rating Course for Learjet 70/75, refer to Appendix 3.6.1 Airmen Minimum Experience for Initial Flight TrainingSpecifications for training detailed in this ANAC GAA report and in the FAAFSB report apply to programs for airmen who have experience in RBHA 91 orRBAC 135 operations and multi-engine transport turbojet aircraft, includingglass cockpit and FMS experience. For airmen not having this experience,additional requirements may be appropriate as determined by ANACDepartment of Flight Standards.6.2 Airmen Minimum Qualification for Differences TrainingThe candidate pilot for a differences training between the airplanes musthold a valid “LR45” type rating and be qualified on the base aircraft.6.3 Training Area of Special Emphasis (TASE)The following areas of emphasis should be addressed during ground andflight training:a) Flight Instruments. The Engine Indication and Crew Alerting System(EICAS), the Primary Flight Displays (PFD), and Multi-Function Displays (MFD).Altitude and airspeed are presented on vertical scale instruments in both digitaland analog formats. Pilots need to be able to understand the multitude ofinformation presented on all the displays. Pilots transitioning from traditionalround dial basic "T" instruments may require additional training and instrumentscan practice to gain proficiency in manually flying by reference to the PFD.Recognition of display failures, reversionary modes, and appropriate correctiveaction to be taken should be addressed.b) Flight Control System. An operational understanding of the basic modesof operation as well as an understanding of the primary and secondary flightcontrol systems and their associated system components. Pitch and rollmechanical disconnect should only be demonstrated in the simulator, andshould never be utilized in the aircraft unless checklist requires it.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 12
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016Demonstration of pitch and roll mechanical disconnect is not required for thepractical test.c) Flight Guidance System including the Autopilot and Flight Director. Anunderstanding of the various lateral and vertical modes and the ability to selectand arm the various modes during different phases of flight is essential. Anoperational understanding of the autopilot and flight director limitations and theskills and ability to operate the aircraft in compliance with associated limitations.d) Digital Electronic Engine Control (DEEC). An operational understandingof the DEEC and the engine thrust selection and limitations are required.e) Control Panels. System control panels using pushbuttons with integrallight bars. Pilots should have an understanding of the switch position andsystem configuration as it relates to whether the light bar is illuminated or not.This understanding is required for both normal and abnormal system operation.f) LR-70/75 Touch Screen Controllers. Pilots should have an understandingof touch screen controllers, navigation through the various pages, the selectedtouch key position and system configuration as it relates to system operation.This understanding is required for both normal, abnormal and emergencysystem operation.g) LR-70/75 G5000 system functionality concerning touch screencontrollers, synoptic pages, display softkeys, FMS functions, database currencyrequirements, synthetic vision, annunciations, flight planning, hazard avoidancesystems, system failure modes and back up controllers.h) Any other function / area deemed appropriate by the ANAC.6.4 Training for Seat Dependent Tasks.Accomplishment of certain tasks, procedures, or maneuvers require trainingof a crewmember for a particular crew position (i.e. captain, first officer, checkairman, etc.). Training programs should recognize and address the necessaryseat / position related tasks for the applicable crewmember. Accordingly,training programs should address seat dependent tasks or maneuvers to theextent necessary to ensure crew proficiency at each position, and inaccordance with ODR tables when applicable.Features or Procedures which could have Seat Dependent Elementsinclude the following:a) Rejected Takeoffb) Emergency DescentANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 13
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016c) Abnormal and Emergency Procedures that require locating circuitbreakers in the left and right crew seatd) Crew coordination for manual gear extensione) Environmental controls at right crew seatf) Oxygen controls at left crew seatANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 14
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20167 Compliance to RBHA 91 and RBAC 135Compliance Checklists with RBHA 91 and RBAC 135 applicable to Learjet45 aircraft provided by the manufacturer are presented on Annex 2.Compliance checklists are provided as an aid to ANAC operationscertification divisions and were not demonstrated to the ANAC AircraftEvaluation Group – GAA/GCOI/SPO.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 15
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 20168 Technical Publications8.1 Master Minimum Equipment List - MMELLearjet 45 MMEL approved by the FAA shall be used by Brazilianoperators as a basis for developing their MEL. These documents are s.faa.gov/PICResults.aspx?mode Publication&doctype MMEL.8.2 Airplane Flight Manual - AFMLearjet 45 AFM approved by GGCP/SAR shall be used by Brazilianoperators as a basis for developing their Operator Airplane Operations Manual(AOM).ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 16
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016Appendix 1Acceptable Operator Difference Requirements (ODR)TablesODR Definitions -Training LevelsDefinitions“HO” Handout“S/T” Slide/Tape presentations“TCBI” Tutorial Computer Based Instruction“SU” Stand-up Instructors“VT” Video Tapes“ICBT” Interactive Computer Based Training“CSS” Cockpit System Simulators“CPT” Cockpit Procedures Trainers“PTT” Part Task Trainers“FTD 2-5” Flight Training Devices (level 2-5)“FTD 6-7” Flight training devices (level 6-7)“FFS A-B” Full Flight Simulators (level A or B )“FFS C-D” Full Flight Simulators (level C or D)“ACFT” AircraftNOTESODRTrainingLevelABCDEAn “X” in an ODR table column indicates that any of thetraining methods listed for that level are acceptable. If aspecific instruction method is specified in an ODR tablecolumn, it must be used.“B” in the Checking column of the ODR tables indicatesa “task” or “systems” check required as specified in“Level B Checking” section found in the CommonProcedures Document.Garmin Integrated Procedures Trainer (IPT) referred asthe Garmin Kiosk by Garmin and Learjet is considereda Cockpit System Simulator “CSS”.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 17
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 40DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE METHODTRAININGDESIGNREMARKSCHKG/CURRFLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVLCHK CURRCHAR CHNG A BCDWeightsMax Ramp Weight reduced to 21,250 lbs.Max Takeoff Weight reduced to 21,000 lbs.Maximum Zero Fuel Weight 16,000 lbs.Dimensions Overall Length Reduced 23.55 inchesNoNoHOAANoNoHOAADIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE METHODTRAININGSYSTEMREMARKS6Dimensions andAreas9Towing andTaxiing11PlacardsFuselage length reduction requires newformulas for weight and balance.Fuselage length reduction results insmaller turning radius, no operationalimpact.Fuel Quantity placards (interior &exterior) change to reflect useablequantity reduction.21Removal of 2 gaspers.Air Conditioning Reduction in length of main cabincondition air ducting.Reduction in length vacuum line(pressurization, outflow valve control).System operation not affected.23Antenna relocation results in no changeCommto system operation.27Flight ControlsReduced length control system cables.Control system operation not affected.28FuelFuel System difference limited to areduction in Total Useable Quantity.No change to any other system aspect.29Reductions in length of hydraulic noseHydraulic Power gear extend and retract lines.Hydraulic system operation notaffected.31CAS and CWP messages added forIndicatingCabin Altitude problem awareness.RecordingL R ECS CAS messages added forSystemsbleed air system failures.Note; These changes will be introducedANAC, Rio de JaneiroCHKG/CURRFLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVLCHK CURRCHAR CHNG AB NoNoHOAANoNoHOAANoNoHOAAOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 18
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016M45 (S/N 001 to 2000) aircraft.DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE METHODTRAININGSYSTEM32LandingGear33LightsFLT PROC LVL LVL LVL LVLCHK CURRCHAR CHNG AB CDREMARKSShorter emergency landing gear cable, nochange in system operation.Interior lights are LED-based, no operationalimpact.34EGPWS, TCAS 2000 and ELT areNavigation installation standards, no operationaldifferences from optional (STC) installations.355 dual masks drop (was 6).OxygenOxygen chart in AFM and Pilot’s manualchanged.52Fuel quantity reduction relocated gravity fuelDoorsfill door, no operational impact.53Fuselage56WindowsFuselage length reduction requires nospecial maintenance or operationalrestrictions.Removal of three windows requires nospecial maintenance or NoHOAANoNoHOAANoNoHOAANoNoHOAADIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 40BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE METHODTRAININGMANEUVERPTSManeuversREMARKSNo ChangesANAC, Rio de JaneiroCHKG/CURRFLT PROC LVLCHAR CHNG ANoNoHOLVLBLVLCCHKG/CURRLVLDCHKCURRAAOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 19
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016ODR Table: Learjet 45 to Learjet 75DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE REMARKSFlight Deck panel layout modifiedto integrate new Garmin 5000avionics suite and to enhanceaesthetics.Relocated flight deck controlpanels.AircraftGeneralLarger wingletsAircraftGeneralPassenger cabin updatedAircraftGeneralWeights and dimensionsunchangedFLT PROC LVLCHAR CHNG AANoNoHOAACOMPLIANCE METHODTRAINING21 ECS21 ECS22 AFCS22 AFCS22 AFCS22 AFCSREMARKSPRESSURIZATION panel resizedand reconfigured.L & R BLEED, PACK, HI FLOWand EMERG PRESS switchesmoved to new PAX/OXY PRESSpanel on pedestal.APU BLEED switch move to APUpanel on pedestal.ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROLSYSTEM (ECS) synoptic pagecontrolled via GTCsFlight Guidance Controller Panel(FGC) replaced by Garmin ModeController (GMC)Flight Director Modes same asHoneywell Primus 1000 suiteexcept FLC versus Speed.New Flight Director Takeoff Modedisplayed on PFDNew autopilot servos, yaw damperand rudder boostANAC, Rio de JaneiroCURRNoDIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)SYSTEMCHKFLT PROCCHAR CHNGNoNoLVLALVLBLVLCNormAbnorm BNoNormNoNormNoNormHOAANoNoHOAATCBI,SUOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 20
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016DIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE METHODTRAININGSYSTEM22 AFCS22 AFCS22 AFCS22 AFCSREMARKSFlight Director button nowengages as well as disengagesflight directorGarmin mode control panel hasup/down wheel for pitch and speedreferenceGarmin mode control panel –ASEL knob now called ALTAutopilot engage/disengage logicdiffers.23 Comm Communication and navigationradio functions selected anddisplayed at Garmin TouchScreens Controllers 1 and 2 (GTC)23 Comm Audio panels functionality selectedand displayed at Garmin TouchScreens Controllers (GTC 1 and 2)23 Comm Active and standby communicationfrequency displayed on Pilot andCopilot DU1 and DU3 controlledby GTCs or GCU23 Comm Control panel removed forClearance Delivery Head radio.New functionality provided by CLRDLY SW/IND and/or EMER COMSW/IND.23 Comm ADS-C and CPDLC(VDL Mode 2) (futuredevelopment)23 Comm Optional HF panel removed,functionality and control at GTC1and 223 Comm Optional SELCAL HF/VHF PRESSFOR TEST/RESET buttonremoved. Controlled at GTC 1 andGTC 2.23 Comm Passenger Address (PA)functionality and selection movedfrom audio panels to GTCs23 Comm Interphone/Intercom functionalitymoved from audio panels to GTCsand additional intercom with passcompartment.23 Comm Transmit and receive selectionmoved from audio panels to GTCsaccessed via GTC radio bars.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroFLT PROCCHAR rmHOAANoNormHOAANoNormAbnorm TTFTD2-5CSS,PTTFTD2-5CSS,PTTFTD2-5OPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 21
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 4523 Comm Oxygen Mask Mic selection movedfrom audio panels to pilot andcopilot switch panels andrelabeledL OXY MIC and R OXY MIC23 Comm RADIO CTL HOT BUS SW/INDremoved, functionalityaccomplished with the clearancedelivery button.23 Comm Optional SatCom handsetremoved. SatCom functionalitycontrolled through GTC 1 and 2.23 Comm GTC recorder capable of recordingand playback of clearances.Original – July 22nd, 2016NoNormAbnorm HOEmerNormHOAANoNormHOAANoNormHOAACOMPLIANCE METHODTRAININGREMARKS24 Electrics ELECTRICAL panel moved fromPilot Switch Panel to pedestal.24 Electrics EMER BATT SW/IND changed tolatched toggle switch for STBYINSTR24 Electrics Larger 28 Amp-Hour lead acidemergency battery including 300Wheater24 Electrics Emergency Bus loadshedding/distribution24 Electrics CAB PWR SW/IND24 Electrics Electrical synoptic page accessedvia GTCs and displayed on DU 2ANoDIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)SYSTEMAFLT PROCCHAR OAATCBI,SU25EquipmentandFurnishings26 FireEmergency Locator Transmitter(ELT) with GPS. ELT switchlocated on pedestal.Engine and APU switches andpanels located on pedestal.NoNoHOAA26 FireCrew Warning Panel/RMUindications removed.NoNoHOAA26 FireFire test performed at GTCsversus rotary test switchNoNormAA27 FlightControlsNoNormHOAA27 FlightControlsEICAS and Synoptic Indicationsof: aileron trim; rudder trim; pitchtrim; flaps; and, spoilersPitch Disconnect handle movedand color changed.NoNoHOAA27 FlightControlsSPLN RESET and FLAP RESETfunctionality moved to FLIGHTNoNormHOAAANAC, Rio de JaneiroTCBI,SUOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 22
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45Original – July 22nd, 2016CONTROL panel on pedestal.27 FlightControls27 FlightControlsPIT TRIM BIAS switch moved toFLIGHT CONTROL panel onpedestal.ELEV DISC handle relocated onpedestal27 FlightControlsRUD BOOST SW/IND located toFLIGHT CONTROL panel onpedestal.27 FlightFlaps test accomplished with SYSControlsTEST/RESET rotary knob onpedestal30 Ice and ANTI-ICE panel moved fromRaincenter switch panel to pedestal.30 Ice and ANTI-ICE test moved from rotaryRainswitch to GTC 1 and 231Three LCD Display Units installedIndicating/ with select key functionality onRecording lower bezel Summary Page and all synopticsdiffer in presentationElectronic Flight InformationSystem (EFIS) differs inpresentation and functionality.Engine Indicating and CrewAlerting System (EICAS) differs inpresentation and functionalitySelectable Synthetic VisionSystem (SVS) on pilot and copilotDUsSystem synoptics changed inpresentationOptional flight data I,SUCSS,PTTFTD2-5NormHOAbnormNo---(future provision)Clock functions and indicationsdiffer.NoNormHOAAAdvisory AOA indicationselectable at PFD.NoNoHOAACockpit Voice Recorder (CVR)panel removed.NoNoHOAAGarmin Stall Warning UAAStall Warning test moved to GTC1 and 2 and indications during testdiffer.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 23
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet ng/Recording31Indicating/RecordingNew green bar indication onairspeed indicator representsapproach reference speed.No optional Runway AwarenessAlerting System (RAAS).Safe Taxi and optional EnhancedSafe Taxi available.Third party provided electronicchecklist displayed on MFD andselected at touch screencontrollers. OperatorResponsibility (future provision)All DUs reversion controls onpilots and copilot’s glareshieldremoved. Functionality nowcontrolled by DUREVERSION/DIM panel onpedestalADC and AHRS reversion knobsremoved, functionally nowcontrolled by DU softkeys.Low Speed Awareness andOverspeed cues on PFDs colorlogic changed.Original – July 22nd, rmTCBI,SUAANoNoAAHODIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE EMARKSHeading, speed, altitude selectbugs and navigation source colorlogic changes.VSI indication changed from anarc to a tape.Electronic navigation chart displayavailableFPA now FPM (Flight PathMarker). Speed carat indicationremoved.GEAR/HYD panel moved from copilot switch panel to center switchpanelLanding gear handle moved fromGEAR/HYD panel to copilot switchpanel.Gear test moved from rotaryswitch to GTC 1 and 2.Landing gear position indicationsANAC, Rio de JaneiroFLT PROCCHAR oNormAANoNoAATCBI,SUHOOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 24
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 45LandingGear32LandingGear32LandingGear33 LightsOriginal – July 22nd, 2016now EICAS indicationsGear Caution/Warning indicationsdiffer in presentation. Logic is thesameSynoptic presentation of AUX HYDand HYD XFLOW indicationsExternal and wing inspection lightcontrol; no smoking/belts; andEMER LTS switches moved fromcenter switch panel to newoverhead light switch panel33 Lights Dimming control panels onpedestal for GTCs, DUs, STBYINSTR and SW/IND34PFD’s Nav source, course andNavigation bearing pointers controlled by DUsoft key selection.34Pilot’s and copilot’s DisplayNavigation Control panels replaced by DUsoftkeys and GTCs.34Garmin integrated AHRS systemNavigation replaces Honeywell I,SU34Navigation radios controlled andNavigation displayed at GTCsNoNorm34Navigation active and standbyNavigation frequencies displayed on PFDsNoNoHOAA34ADC test removed, now a BIT test.NavigationNoNormHOAATCBI,SUDIFFERENCE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 75BASE AIRCRAFT: Learjet 45APPROVED BY(POI)COMPLIANCE gation34NavigationREMARKSElectronic Standby InstrumentSystem installed (ESIS) Fourstandby indications: A/S; ALT;ATT; and HDG.ESIS capable of ILS guidance.PFD’s Nav Source and bearingpointers selected via DU softkeys.Course controlled via GarminMode Controller (GMC)Mode S transponder withEnhanced Surveillance and ADSB-Out (future provision) selectedand displayed at GTCs.Transponder automatic - groundor altitude.ANAC, Rio de JaneiroFLT PROC LVLCHAR D2-5CHKG/CURRLVLDCHK CURRBBAAHOAAHOAATCBI,SUOPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT – PAGE 25
Operational Evaluation Report – Learjet 4534Navigation34NavigationLightning detection standardequipment and controlled by GTC1 and 2New weather radar selected atGTCs. No separate control panel.34NavigationFMS CDUs removed, functionalityand control at GTC1 and 234NavigationPFD inset map available to displaytraffic and navigation mapcontrolled by PFD softkeys.FMS GPS navigation sourceonly,
Learjet 40, 45, 70 and 75. Unless otherwise specified, Learjet 45 means the Learjet 40, 45, 70 and 75. Learjet 45, Learjet 40, Learjet 70 and Learjet 75 can also be referred as LR-45, LR-40, LR-70 and LR-75 respectively. 2.3 Purpose The purpose of this report is to: a. Define the Pilot Type Rating
Operational Evaluation Report - Cessna CE-525, 525A, 525B, 525C Original - March 12, 2015 ANAC, Rio de Janeiro OPERATIONAL EVALUATION REPORT - PAGE 9 3 Pilot Type Rating There are two pilot type ratings assigned to the CE-525, 525A, 525B and 525C aircraft, depending on the kind of operation: C525, for single pilot operations; and
EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW TEMPLATE Bureau for Policy, Planning and Learning August 2017 EVALUATION REPORT CHECKLIST AND REVIEW TEMPLATE-4 Evaluation Report Review Template This Review Template is for use during a peer review of a draft evaluation report for assessing the quality of the report.
POINT METHOD OF JOB EVALUATION -- 2 6 3 Bergmann, T. J., and Scarpello, V. G. (2001). Point schedule to method of job evaluation. In Compensation decision '. This is one making. New York, NY: Harcourt. f dollar . ' POINT METHOD OF JOB EVALUATION In the point method (also called point factor) of job evaluation, the organizationFile Size: 575KBPage Count: 12Explore further4 Different Types of Job Evaluation Methods - Workologyworkology.comPoint Method Job Evaluation Example Work - Chron.comwork.chron.comSAMPLE APPLICATION SCORING MATRIXwww.talent.wisc.eduSix Steps to Conducting a Job Analysis - OPM.govwww.opm.govJob Evaluation: Point Method - HR-Guidewww.hr-guide.comRecommended to you b
Section 2 Evaluation Essentials covers the nuts and bolts of 'how to do' evaluation including evaluation stages, evaluation questions, and a range of evaluation methods. Section 3 Evaluation Frameworks and Logic Models introduces logic models and how these form an integral part of the approach to planning and evaluation. It also
Independent Evaluation of the UN Peace Fund for Nepal Evaluation Report 5 PREFACE The Terms of Reference issued by the United Nations Peace Fund for Nepal (UNPFN) stipulated that the evaluation be divided into two main phases, each concluded by a report: the Inception and the Evaluation Phase. This is the draft Evaluation Report.
Mercury Inventory Russian FederationTerminal Evaluation report February 2018 4 ABOUT THE EVALUATION1 Joint Evaluation: No Report Language(s): English Evaluation Type: Terminal Project Evaluation Brief Description: This report is a terminal evaluation of a UN Environment-GEF project implemented between 2013 and 2017.
Jul 24, 2019 · 3. ASCE 41 Tier 1 Seismic Evaluation ASCE 41 provides a three-tiered evaluation approach: a Screening Phase (Tier 1), an Evaluation Phase (Tier 2), and a Detailed Evaluation Phase (Tier 3). A Tier 1 evaluation consists of checklists that allow for a rapid evaluation of the
Operational Planning Guidelines . Operational Support Function 1 Functional Responsibility: 2 3 / / Purpose: 4 Support Agencies 5 Introductory Statement (Optional) 6 Element Issues to be addressed 7 7 8 . C. The Operational Checklist: The Operational checklist is designed for use during activations, to record actions taken, and the .
