Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Expansion: Project

2y ago
37 Views
4 Downloads
9.60 MB
23 Pages
Last View : 1d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Xander Jaffe
Transcription

Hampton Roads Bridge Tunnel Expansion:Project Development UpdateMay 17, 2018James S. UtterbackHRBT Project DirectorVirginia Department of Transportation

5/17/2018

Ten Hampton Roads TunnelsChesapeake ChannelTunnel (1964)Hampton RoadsBridge-Tunnel(1957 & 1976)Thimble ShoalTunnel (1964)Monitor-MerrimacMemorial BridgeTunnel (1992)MidtownTunnel(1962 & 2016)5/17/2018DowntownTunnel(1952 & 1987)3

5/17/2018 9 tunnels are steel-shell immersed tubes 1 tunnel is concrete-box immersed tube Future tunnel #11 at Thimble Shoal will be bored 1965196019551950Midtown Tunnel #2Monitor-MerrimacDowntown Tunnel #2Hampton Roads #2Midtown Tunnel #1Thimble Shoal #1& Chesapeake #1Hampton Roads #1Downtown Tunnel #165 Years of Tunneling in Hampton Roads19764

HRBT Expansion - Scope of Work Between SettlersLandinginHampton and I-564in Norfolk Improvements in I64 including theconstruction of anew 4 lane HRBTtunnel New 4 lane HRBTtunnel will serveEastbound traffic 2 existing HRBTtunnels will serveWestbound traffic

Proposed Tunnel Alignment(Hampton Side)65/17/2018

Proposed Tunnel Alignment(Norfolk Side)5/17/20187

Proposed Lane Configurationfor Tunnel and Approach Bridges 2 1 1 concept in each direction: 2 free General Purpose lanes 1 full-time HOT lane 1 peak-hour HOT lane on left shoulder5/17/20188

Tunnel Considerations Landside work has risks but is largely conventional Tunnel work is less conventional and will generate greatestrisks from cost and schedule standpoint This is a rare location where both immersed-tube and boredtunnel construction methods are feasible All ten Hampton Roads tunnels to date have been immersed tubes Until recently, bored tunnels were not feasible in soft soils But recent advances in technology now make bored tunnelspossible in soft soils These methods were directly compared in the nearby ThimbleShoal Tunnel procurement in 20155/17/20189

Immersed-Tube Tunneling (ITT)5/17/201810

Immersed Tube Elements5/17/201811

Conceptual Tunnel Section (Immersed)UtilityCorridorJet FansEgressCorridor5/17/201812

Tunnel Boring Machine5/17/201813

Twin Bore with TBM5/17/201814

Conceptual Tunnel Section (Bored)5/17/201815

Key Differences between Boredand Immersed-Tube Tunneling Alignment ITT alignment must be further away from existing tunnel (HamptonRoads rule of thumb about 200 feet) Bored tunnel can be much closer to existing facilities (general ruleof thumb about one diameter 50 feet) Geotechnical ITT method has limited concern for soil properties, since soil alongtunnel path is dredged out and removed Bored method is specifically tailored to local soil properties Environmental and Permitting Section 408 coordination with marine stakeholders / federal channel Section 103 concurrence for offshore disposal of ITT spoils JPA permit for disposal of bored-tunnel spoils5/17/2018161976

D-B Procurement (PPTA vs VPPA)VDOT has the authority to pursue a Design-Build (D-B)procurement under both the PPTA or VPPA: Current VDOT D-B (VPPA) template was not developed tohandle a project of HRBT magnitude PPTA provides contractual flexibility for complex riskprofile (significant construction and geotechnical risk) PPTA encourages innovation through extensive use ofAlternative Technical Concepts (ATCs) process PPTA provides for iterative process that invites feedbackand collaboration from the proposers in order to developmore responsive procurement documents5/17/201817

Procurement ActivitiesCompleted to DateDATEACTIVITYDecember 15, 2017RFQ issuedDecember 15, 2017 to February 7, 2018Q&A periodJanuary 19, 2018Project Information MeetingFebruary 2018SOQ Evaluation Manual developedFebruary 1, 2018Addendum No. 1 issuedFebruary 5 to 6, 2018One-on-one meetingsFebruary 16, 2018Addendum No. 2 issuedMarch 2, 20183 teams submitted SOQsMarch 5 to 9, 2018SOQ evaluation (sequestration)March 12 to April 10, 2018Reference checks, clarification questionsApril 2, 2018Selection Committee metApril 26, 2018Announcement of Short-listed Offerorteams18

Key Points in SOQ EvaluationTwo-part Evaluation MethodPass/Fail Review Compliance and completion of submission Offeror legal information and financial capabilityQualitative Evaluation Equal emphasis on General Technical Qualifications (50 points)and Tunnel Delivery Qualifications (50 points) Option to submit for either or both Immersed Tube Tunnel andBored Tunnel methodologies

Key Points in SOQ EvaluationQualitative EvaluationObjective is to short-list well-integrated teams that demonstrateexperience in: Design and construction of large diameter roadway or rail tunnels Bridge design and construction in marine environments and in closeproximity to existing structures and bridges Widening heavily-traveled environments in urban environmentsrequiring complex maintenance of traffic Land reclamation/island construction in a tidal marine environment Construction in an active navigable channel

SOQ SubmissionsTEAMSLeadContractorSkanska – KiewitJV(ITT)Skanska USA CivilSoutheast Inc.Kiewit Infrastructure Co.Hampton RoadsCapacityConstructors(ITT BT)Fluor Enterprises, Inc.Dragados USAThe Lane ConstructionCorporationVinci ConstructionGrands ProjectsTraylor Bros., Inc.Dodin CampenonBernard SASDragages Civil WorksVirginia, LLC (Boyguessubsidiary)LeadDesignerWSP USA Inc.Hampton RoadsConnectorPartners JV(ITT BT)AECOM TechnicalServices, Inc.I-64 Design JV HDREngineering, Inc. Mott MacDonald

Next Procurement ActivitiesActivityDraft Request for ProposalsAlternative Technical Concept ProcessFinal Request for ProposalsSelection of Best Value ProposalTarget DateMay 2018Summer/Fall 2018Fall 2018January 2019PPTA Statutory AuditEarly 2019Execution of Comprehensive AgreementEarly 2019PPTA Steering Committee BriefingNo later than 60 daysfrom execution of CA

23

Downtown Tunnel #1 Hampton Roads #1 Midtown Tunnel #1 Thimble Shoal #1 & Chesapeake #1 Hampton Roads #2 Downtown Tunnel #2 Monitor-Merrimac Midtown Tunnel #2 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 9 tunnels are steel-shell immersed tubes

Related Documents:

Feb 21, 2018 · Downtown Tunnel #1 Hampton Roads #1 Midtown Tunnel #1 Thimble Shoal #1 & Chesapeake #1 Hampton Roads #2 Downtown Tunnel #2 Monitor-Merrimac Midtown Tunnel #2 1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2020 65 Years of Tunneling in

Future tunnel #11 at Thimble Shoal will be bored tunnel Settlers Landing in Hampton to I-564 Norfolk (9.5 Miles) I-64 improvements include 6 lanes of highway and construction of 4 lane bridge/tunnel New 4 lane HRBT tunnel will s

The Chesapeake Bay Bridge Tunnel, shown in a 2000 file photo. (Steve Earley Virginian-Pilot file photo) View full-size photo Buy Pilot photos RELATED Meetings set on Bay Bridge-Tunnel toll increase - Jul. 18 Bay Bridge-Tunnel moves toward higher toll, expansion - May. 31 Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel to offer big discount - Feb. 13

The Hampton Roads Connector Partners (HRCP) is hereby authorized under section 101(a)(5)(D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1371(a)(5)(D)) to harass marine mammals incidental to the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel (HRBT) Expansion Project, Hampton-Norfolk, Virginia

Hampton Roads Transit (HRT). This budget reflects 17.5 million in operating revenues, 83.0 million in non-operating revenues, and 100.5 million in expenses. We trust you will find this document informative and useful. HRT's mission is to connect Hampton Roads through high quality, safe, efficient, and sustainable transportation services.

Hampton Roads as either excellent or good, while 46 percent rated economic conditions as fair or poor. This portion rating the regional economy as excellent or good was the highest in 2015 and only decreased slightly this year. Life in Hampton Roads is not without its challenges and Hampton Roads residents continue to have

Roads in Malaysia are classified into two broad categories, namely Federal Roads and State Roads. 2.1 Federal Roads Federal roads are all roads declared under the Federal Roads Ordinace (1959) and the major interurban roads joining the state capitals and roads leading to points of entry to and exit from the country.

Each 100 mL contains 900 mg of Sodium Chloride, USP (NaCl). The osmolarity is 308 mOsmol/L (calculated). It contains 154 mEq/L sodium and 154 mEq/L chloride. The MINI-BAG Plus Container is a standard diluent container with an integral drug vial adaptor. It allows for drug admixture after connection to a . single dose . powdered drug vial having a . 20 mm closure. A breakaway seal in the tube .