Existential Theories 1 RUNNING HEAD: EXISTENTIAL THEORIES .

2y ago
23 Views
2 Downloads
372.74 KB
63 Pages
Last View : 14d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Philip Renner
Transcription

Existential Theories1RUNNING HEAD: EXISTENTIAL THEORIESExistential and Humanistic TheoriesPaul T. P. WongGraduate Program in Counselling PsychologyTrinity Western UniversityIn Wong, P. T. P. (2005). Existential and humanistic theories. In J. C. Thomas, & D. L.Segal (Eds.), Comprehensive Handbook of Personality and Psychopathology (pp.192-211). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Existential Theories2ABSTRACTThis chapter presents the historical roots of existential and humanistic theories and thendescribes four specific theories: European existential-phenomenological psychology,Logotherapy and existential analysis, American existential psychology and Americanhumanistic psychology. After examining these theories, the chapter presents a reformulatedexistential-humanistic theory, which focuses on goal-striving for meaning and fulfillment.This meaning-centered approach to personality incorporates both negative and positiveexistential givens and addresses four main themes: (a) Human nature and human condition,(b) Personal growth and actualization, (c) The dynamics and structure of personality basedon existential givens, and (c) The human context and positive community. The chapter thenreviews selected areas of meaning-oriented research and discusses the vital role of meaningin major domains of life.

Existential Theories3EXISTENTIAL AND HUMANISTIC THEORIESExistential and humanistic theories are as varied as the progenitors associated with them.They are also separated by philosophical disagreements and cultural differences (Spinelli,1989, 2001). Nevertheless, they all share some fundamental assumptions about humannature and human condition that set them apart from other theories of personality. Theoverarching assumption is that individuals have the freedom and courage to transcendexistential givens and biological/environmental influences to create their own future.Secondly, they emphasize the phenomenological reality of the experiencing person.Thirdly, they are holistic in their focus on the lived experience and future aspirations of thewhole person in action and in context. Finally, they attempt to capture the high drama ofhuman existence – the striving for survival and fulfillment in spite of the humanvulnerability to dread and despair.This particular perspective raises several questions relevant to the struggles and challengesfaced by all people: What is the point of striving towards a life goal, when death is theinevitable end? How can people find meaning and fulfillment in the midst of failures,sufferings and chaos? How can they realize their potential and become fully functioning?What is the primary, unifying motivation that keeps them going in spite of setbacks anddifficulties?Generally, European existentialists (e.g., Heidegger, Biswanger) tend to be pessimistic intheir emphasis on the negative existential givens, such as the dread of nothingness andanxiety about meaninglessness. American humanistic psychologists (e.g., Maslow,

Existential Theories4Rogers), on the other hand, tend to be optimistic in their focus on the positive existentialgivens, such as growth-orientation and self-actualization.The meaning-centered approach integrates both points of view. Thus, personality dynamicsstem from the conflict between negative and positive existential givens. The choicesindividuals make in resolving the inner conflict result in different personalities. Thestructure of personality is viewed primarily as a life story situated in a particular context.The human story is about the lived experience of individuals searching for meaning andfulfillment in a world that is beyond comprehension and control.The present chapter reviews the historical roots of existential and humanistic theories,critiques the major existential and humanistic models before articulating the meaningcentered approach as a reformulated existential-humanistic theory. The chapter thenpresents the empirical evidence and discusses the practical implications of the meaningcentered approach.Reasons for re-formulating the existential-humanistic theory include:1. Provide a more balanced and realistic view of the human condition by recognizingthe ongoing conflicts between the positive and negative existential givens2. Need a common existential-humanistic theory capable of explaining both the bestand worst of human behaviors3. Need to clarify and operationalize important existential and humanistic concepts4. Reframe the crucial issues of existential, humanistic psychology in terms of thehuman struggle for survival and fulfillment in a chaotic and difficult world

Existential Theories55. Facilitate rapprochement between qualitative and quantitative research traditions6. Bridge the gaps between existential, humanistic and transpersonal psychology bymaking goal-striving for meaning and significance the common foundationSTATEMENT OF THE THEORIESHistorical backgroundPhilosophical rootsExistential psychology is based on existential philosophy. Its philosophical roots can betraced to the works of Søren Kierkegaard (1813-1855), Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900),Karl Jaspers (1883-1969), Edmund Husserl (1859-1938), and Martin Heidegger (18891976). Husserl (1962), founder of phenomenology, emphasizes that knowledge begins withsubjective human experience, thus rejecting scientific realism and mind-body dualism.Phenomenology seeks to describe and clarify the immediate experience, with everydaylanguage rather than scientific vocabulary.Bearing a clear mark of Husserl’s influence, Heidegger’s (1962) philosophy of existence(ontology) is sometimes characterized as existential-phenomenological. His mostinfluential concept is Being-in-the-world. The person has his/her being or existence in theworld, and the world has its existence as experienced and disclosed by the being. The worldchanges as the person’s ideas about it change. The person and the human world are one,because they cannot exist apart from each other.

Existential Theories6Existentialism as a popular movement in Europe began right after the end of World War II.Its main proponents are two French intellectuals: Jean-Paul Sartre (1905-1980) and AlbertCamus (1913-1960). Existentialism is concerned with the ontological issues of humanexistence, such as freedom, responsibility, and authenticity. Even though human existenceis devoid of ultimate meaning, individuals can create meaning and live authenticallythrough the choices they make.In spite of his dark and pessimistic view of life, Jean-Paul Sartre also affirms the limitlesspossibilities of individual freedom. To Sartre, freedom is the fountain of hope, thefoundation of all human values. Freedom constitutes us as human beings. Freedom, notbiology, is our destiny. Through the exercise of freedom, we can transcend our genes, ourpast history and the environment. Our capacity to choose how we exist determines whatkind of people we will become. Thus, “existence precedes essence”.Psychological rootsTwo Swiss psychiatrists were primarily responsible for applying philosophicalphenomenology to psychotherapy and psychology. Ludwig Biswanger, influenced byMartin Heidegger and Martin Buber, was the first self-declared existential analyst. He hasbeen able to apply Heidegger’s concept of Being-in-the-world to psychotherapy(Biswanger, 1958). Medard Boss (1963), a friend of Heidegger, was director of the Instituteof Daseinsanalytic Therapy. He has had considerable impact on American humanisticpsychology. An entire issue of The Humanistic Psychologist (Craig, 1988) was devoted toBoss.

Existential Theories7Biswanger believes that the truth about human existence cannot be acquired throughexperimentation and intellectual exercise; it can only be revealed through thephenomenological methods of describing lived experiences. To study the person as a wholeand gain a complete understanding of human existence, we need to include three levels orthree regions of the conscious experience: (a) Umwelt (the biological world): Oursensations about our body and the physical world around us, such as pleasure and pain,warmth and cold. (b) Mitwelt (the social world): Our social relations, community andculture, including how we feel and think about others. (c) Eigenwelt (psychological world):The subjective, phenomenological world of personal meaning, such as our awareness of thespecial meaning something holds and our understanding of the experience itself.The experience of being in the world points to the experience of non-being or nothingness.The dread of nothingness is one of the existential givens. However, this negative given maybe mitigated by the positive existential given of yearning to realize one’s new possibilities.This desire is captured by the concept of Being-beyond-the-world through transcending theworld in which one lives. Transcendence refers to the capacity to transcend time and spaceof the present world by transporting oneself to the future. It entails the capacity to chooseone’s future in spite of the constraints from the present and past. Transcendence entailsmore than imagination and creative symbolism; it involves making courageous choices,designing one’s own world, and taking actions to fulfill one’s full potentiality.To choose the possibilities for change is to live an authentic life and become fully human.On the other hand, when individuals avoid the risk of change and choose to remain wherethey are, then they are living an inauthentic existence. Individuals are free to choose either

Existential Theories8kind of life. However, authenticity does not automatically mean self-actualization, becausethe project of becoming fully human is fraught with difficulty. Therefore, the existentialguilt of failing to fulfill all possibilities is always with us. Part of the difficulty in thehuman project is due to ground of existence, which limits our freedom. The concept of“ground of existence” represents conditions of “thrownness” which constitute one’sdestiny. One can still live an authentic life by achieving the possibilities within thelimitations due to thrownness. These early existential psychologists clearly recognize thedialectical dynamics of inner conflict – the negative existential givens of anxiety, dread,guilt, and despair as well as the positive existential givens of freedom, responsibility, andtranscendence. The concept of Being-in-the-world can be understood as person-in-context,because it encompasses the person’s biological, psychological, existential and spiritualneeds as well as the social/cultural context.European existential-phenomenological psychotherapyErnesto Spinelli (1989, 1997) and Emmy van Deurzen (1988, 1997) are among the leadersin existential psychotherapy in Europe today. Both are strongly influenced by existentialphenomenological philosophy. Cooper (2003) has provided a more detailed description ofthe British school of existential analysis and more recent developments.Emmy van Deurzen’s approach to existential therapy is to enable people to (a) becomemore authentic, (b) broaden their understanding of themselves and their future, and (c)create something worth living in the present. These therapeutic goals are achieved throughclarifying the clients’ assumptions, values, and worldviews, exploring what is meaningfulto them, and empowering them to confront existential givens and personal limitations with

Existential Theories9honesty and authenticity. Similarly, for Ernesto Spinelli (1989), the therapeutic goal is “tooffer the means for individuals to examine, confront and clarify and reassess theirunderstanding of life, the problems encountered throughout their life, and the limitsimposed upon the possibilities inherent in being-in-the-world” (p.127). This goal can beachieved through adopting an attitude of empathy and neutrality, using descriptivequestioning to clarify their present experience, and facilitating their discovery of their ownmeanings in spite of the existential givens. His latest book (1997) focuses on dialogues andencounters in therapeutic relationships and presents several case studies.Both Spinelli and Van Duersen implicitly recognize the positive existential givens, such asthe quest for meaning, authenticity and fulfillment of potentiality in spite of the negativeexistential givens. Healthy personality development requires (a) confronting and acceptingnegative existential givens, (b) living with conflicts and limitations, and (c) affirming thepossibilities of authentic living and personal growth. However, Spinelli (2000) does notaccept actualization as an inevitable tendency of the self, and points out that bothwholeness and incompleteness are aspects of lived experience.Logotherapy and existential analysisDifferent from other European existential psychologists, Viktor Frankl (1905-1997) wasthe first to emphasize positive existential givens. This is remarkable, because personally heexperienced more horrors and sufferings than any of the other existential philosophers andpsychologists. Frankl spent 1942-1945 in Nazi concentration camps. His parents, brotherand wife were all murdered in Nazi death camps. According to his own account (Frankl,1984), he developed Logotherapy and Existential Analysis, known as the “Third Viennese

Existential Theories 10School of Psychotherapy” in 1938, out of his dissatisfaction with psychoanalysis. Franklstudied with both Freud and Adler. He accepted Freud’s concept of unconsciousness, butconsidered the will to meaning as more fundamental to human development than the will topleasure. Existential analysis, similar to psychoanalysis, is designed to bring toconsciousness and enhance the “hidden” logos. Existential analysis refers to the specifictherapeutic process involved in helping people discover their meaning in life. “Logotherapyregards its assignment as that of assisting the patient to find meaning in his life. Inasmuchas logotherapy makes him aware of the hidden logos of his existence, it is an analyticalprocess” (Frankl, 1984, p.125). However, in Frankl’s writing, the two terms are used eitherinterchangeably or together as a unified name.Logotherapy was put to a severe test in a very personal way when Frankl was incarceratedin Nazi concentration camps. “This was the lesson I had to learn in three years spent inAuschwitz and Dachau: those most apt to survive the camps were those oriented toward thefuture, toward a meaning to be fulfilled by them in the future” (Frankl, 1985, p.37). Thisobservation strengthened his belief that the primary human motivation is the “will-tomeaning”.Logotherapy is a distinct branch of existential-humanistic school of psychotherapy, becauseof its focus on positive meaning and the human spirit (Wong, 2002a). What sets Franklapart from Rollo May and Irvin Yalom (2000) is his unconditional affirmation of life’smeaning, including the ultimate meaning. The main objective of logotherapy is twofold:facilitate clients’ quest for meaning and empower them to live responsibly, regardless oftheir life circumstances. Logotherapy literally means “healing or therapy through

Existential Theories 11meaning”. It comes from the Greek word logos, which may mean the word, meaning, orGod’s will (Fabry, 1994). Most people do not realize that logotherapy is actually aspiritually-oriented approach towards psychotherapy. “A psychotherapy which not onlyrecognizes man’s spirit, but actually starts from it may be termed logotherapy. In thisconnection, logos is intended to signify ‘the spiritual’ and beyond that ‘the meaning’”(Frankl, 1986, xvii). Frankl (1986) proposes that “three factors characterize humanexistence as such: man’s spirituality, his freedom, his responsibility” (xxiv). According toFrankl’s dimensional ontology (Frankl, 1986), human beings exist in three dimensions -somatic, mental and spiritual. Spirituality is the uniquely human dimension. However,these different dimensional entities must be understood in their totality, because a person isa unity in complexity.Specific vs. ultimate meaningAccording to Frankl (1967, 1984, 1986) there are two levels of meaning: (a) the presentmeaning, or meaning of the moment, and (b) the ultimate meaning or super-meaning.Frankl believes that it is more helpful to address specific meaning of the moment, of thesituation, rather than talking about meaning of life in general, because ultimate meaningsexist in the supra-human dimension, which is “hidden” from us. Each individual mustdiscover the specific meanings of the moment. Only the individual knows the rightmeaning specific to the moment. The therapist can also facilitate the quest and guide themto those areas in which meanings can be found (Fabry, 1994; Frankl, 1984, 1986).Meaning vs. valueValues are abstract meanings based on the lived experiences of many, many individuals.Frankl (1967, 1986) believes that these values can guide our search for meaning and

Existential Theories 12simplify decision-making. Traditional values are the examples of the accumulation ofmeaning experiences of many individuals over a long period of time. However, thesevalues are threatened by modernization. Even with the loss of traditional values,individuals can still find meaning in concrete situations. According to Frankl (1967) “Evenif all universal values disappeared, life would remain meaningful, since the uniquemeanings remain untouched by the loss of traditions” (p.64).Values may lie latent and need to be awakened and discovered. For example, in the camp,prisoners were degraded and treated as nonentities. Most of them became demoralized andbehaved like animals. However, some prisoners were able to maintain their dignity and asense of self-worth. Frankl (1984) commented that “The consciousness of one’s inner valueis anchored in higher, more spiritual things, and cannot be shaken by camp life. But howmany free men, let alone prisoners, possess it?” (p.83).Basic tenets of logotherapyThe logotherapeutic tenets include freedom of will, the will to meaning and the meaning oflife (Frankl 1967, 1969, 1986).(1) Freedom of will: Frankl (1978) realizes that “Human freedom is finite freedom. Man isnot free from conditions. But he is free to take a stand in regard to them. The conditions donot completely condition him” (p.47). Frankl believes that although our existence isinfluenced by instincts, inherited disposition and environment, an area of freedom is alwaysavailable to us. “Everything can be taken from a man, but the last of the human freedoms-- to choose one’s attitude in any a given set of circumstances, to choose one’s own way”(Frankl, 1963, p.104). Therefore, we all have the freedom to take a stand towards thedeterministic conditions, to transcend our fate. With freedom comes responsibility. Frankl

Existential Theories 13(1984) differentiates between responsibility and responsibleness. The former comes frompossessing the freedom of will. The latter refers to exercising our freedom to make the rightdecisions according to the demands of life.(2) Will to meaning: This is “the basic striving of man to find meaning and purpose”(Frankl, 1969, p.35). The will-to-meaning is possible because of the human capacity ofself-transcendence: “Being human is being always directed, and pointing to something orsomeone other than oneself: to a meaning to fulfill or another human being to encounter, acause to serve or a person to love” (Frankl, 1978, p.35). Self-transcendence allows peopleto be free from the confines of time and space. They are able to move from what they aretowards what they “ought to be” or “should be”. Self-transcendence is essential for findinghappiness, because fulfillment is a by-product of meaning: “Only to the extent to whichman fulfils a meaning out there in the world, does he fulfil himself” (Frankl, 1969, p.38).(3) Meaning of life: For Frankl (1963), “The meaning of our existence is not invented byourselves, but rather detected” (p.157). It is an “Aha” experience, a moment of awarenessand awakening, akin to enlightenment. How do we answer the existential question: “Is lifeas a whole meaningful or meaningless”? On the one hand, he avoids giving an abstractanswer to such general existential questions; on the other hand, he affirms the potential formeaningfulness for every human being in all situations. Frankl (1984) suggests three waysof finding meaning: “According to logotherapy, we can discover this meaning in life inthree different ways: (1) by creating a work or doing a deed; (2) by experiencing somethingor encountering someone; and (3) by the attitude we take towards unavoidable suffering”(p.133).Attitudinal values are especially important in situations of unavoidable suffering. Frankl

Existential Theories 14(1969) claims: “This is why life never ceases to hold meaning, for even a person who isdeprived of both creative and experiential values is still challenged by a meaning to fulfil,that is, by the meaning inherent in the right, in an upright way of suffering” (p.70).Existential frustration and noogenic neurosisExistential frustration is a universal human experience, because the quest for meaning canbe blocked by external circumstances as well as internal hindrances. When the will tomeaning is frustrated, one may develop noogenic neurosis or existential vacuum.“Noogenic neuroses have their origin not in the psychological but rather in the ‘noological’(from the Greek noos meaning mind) dimension of human existence” (Frankl, 1984,p.123). Therefore, other forms of psychotherapy would not be adequate, and Logotherapyis specifically appropriate in dealing with existential neuroses.Existential vacuum refers to general sense of meaninglessness or emptiness, as evidencedby a state of boredom. It is a widespread phenomenon of the twentieth century, as a resultof industrialization, the loss of traditional values and dehumanization of individuals. Mostpeople may experience existential vacuum without developing existential neurosis. Manypeople feel that life has no purpose, no challenge, no obligation and they try to fill theirexistential vacuum with materials things, pleasure, sex, power, or busy work, but they aremisguided (Frankl, 1984). “The feeling of meaninglessness not only underlies the massneurotic triad of today, i.e., depression-addiction-aggression, but also may eventually resultin what we logotherapists call a ‘noogenic neurosis” (Frankl, 1986, p.298). Existentialvacuum is not a neurosis or disease. In fact, it may make us aware of our own emptinessand trigger a quest for meaning. The therapist can empower and challenge the clients to filltheir inner emptiness. Logotherapy can supplement psychotherapy in psychogenic cases

Existential Theories 15and somatogenic neurosis, because “by filling the existential vacuum, the patient will beprevented from suffering further relapses” (Frankl, 1984, p.130).Suffering and tragic triadFrankl (1984) reasons that “If there is a meaning in life at all, then there must be a meaningin suffering. Suffering is an ineradicable part of life, even as fate and death” (p.88).Suffering is not a necessary condition for meaning, but suffering tends to trigger the questfor meaning. Frankl (1967) observes that the Homo Sapiens is concerned with success,while the Homo Patiens (the suffering human being) is more concerned about meaning.Frankl (1963, 1984) has observed through his own experience and his observation ofprisoners and clients that people are willing to endure any suffering, if they are convincedthat this suffering has meaning. However, suffering without meaning leads to despair.Quest for meaning is more likely to be occasioned by three negative facets of humanexistence: pain, guilt and death. Pain refers to human suffering, guilt to the awareness ofour fallibility and death to our awareness of the transitoriness of life (Frankl, 1967, 1984).These negative experiences make us more aware of our needs for meaning and spiritualconnection. Neuroses are more likely to originate from our attempt to obscure the reality ofpain, guilt and death as existential facts (Frankl, 1967, 1984). Logotherapy provides ananswer to the tragic triad through attitudinal values and tragic optimism (Frankl, 1984):“I speak of a tragic optimism, that is, an optimism in the face of tragedy and inview of the human potential which at its best always allows for: (a) turningsuffering into a human achievement and accomplishment; (2) deriving from guiltthe opportunity to change oneself for the better; and (3) deriving from life’stransitoriness an incentive to take responsible action” (p.162)

Existential Theories 16The positive existential psychology of Viktor FranklFrankl is unabashedly positive, emphasizing human strengths without downplaying thedifficulties inherent in human existence. He discovered in concentration camps that “someof our comrades behaved like swine while others behaved like saints. Man has bothpotentialities within himself; which one is actualized depends on decisions but not onconditions” (Frankl, 1984, p.157). He believes that “it is possible to say yes to life in spiteof all the tragic aspects of human existence” (p.17). “Man is capable of changing the worldfor the better if possible, and of changing himself for the better if necessary” (p.154).Therefore, “life is potentially meaningful under any conditions, be they pleasurable ormiserable” (Frankl, 1986, p.301). This affirmation of meaning is the foundation oflogotherapy. However, Viktor Frankl’s impact extends far beyond logotherapy andpsychotherapy. He deserves to be recognized as the father of positive psychology. Hispositive triad – meaning, optimism, and spirituality – have become the major research areasfor several disciplines, such as psychology, medicine, management and education, asattested by Batthyany and Guttmann’s (2005) annotated bibliography of research onmeaning and purpose.American Existential PsychologyExistential psychology was introduced to America by Rollo May (1909-1994). Theearly history of existential psychology in America can be found in May, Angel, andEllenberger (1958), and May (1961). May acknowledges the influence of Husserl,Heidegger, Merleau-Ponty, Biswanger, William James, Paul Tillich, and R. D.Laing. May plays a key role in bridging between European existentialism and

Existential Theories 17American psychology. Influenced by European existential philosophers andpsychologists, May (1950) focuses on anxiety as an inevitable given in humanexistence and recognizes a prevailing sense of meaninglessness as a major problemfor modern age.May (1965) clarifies Husserl’s concept of intentionality and makes it the central piece ofhuman consciousness. Intentionality is “the structure which gives meaning to experience"and it underlies the process of planning and decision making among several alternatives.All human beings are confronted with a basic choice between ontological anxiety andontological guilt. The former refers to choosing the future in spite of fear of the unknownand difficulties ahead. The latter refers to choosing the status quo and familiar pastpractices; it will bring ontological guilt because of a felt sense of missed opportunity. Onecan achieve authenticity by having the encourage to embark on an unknown future.May (1953) is concerned about the loss of traditional values and a sense of personal dignityas the sources of anxiety:"The upshot is that the values and goals which provided a unifying center forprevious centuries in the modern period no longer are cogent. We have not yetfound the new center which will enable us to choose our goals constructively, andthus to overcome the painful bewilderment and anxiety of not knowing which wayto move. Another root of our malady is our loss of the sense of the worth anddignity of the human being" (p. 49).

Existential Theories 18Following Heidegger, May (1961) later points out that the main source of anxiety andconflict comes from the self-consciousness of the “I am” experience in the world and theawareness of the state of non-being or nothingness. Paradoxically, in order to affirm orpreserve their sense of self, they need to give up part of their self-centeredness by reachingout to others. Similarly, in order to overcome the anxiety of non-being, they need to havethe courage to develop new possibilities. Freedom and courage enable individuals to riseabove their anxiety and personal issues. "Freedom is man's capacity to take a hand in hisown development. It is our capacity to mold ourselves" (May, 1953, p. 138). The challengeis to live each moment with freedom and responsibility. While freedom enables one to riseabove personal problems, the exercise of freedom can also become a source of anxiety. Inthe absence of traditional values as consistent guides, the individuals are thrown on theirown to make the right decisions. "Courage is the capacity to meet the anxiety which arisesas one achieves freedom. It is the willingness to differentiate, to move from the protectingrealms of parental dependence to new levels of freedom and integration" (May, 1953, p.192).Courage is paradoxical. In Courage to Create, May (1994) elaborates on the concept ofcourage, which means the capacity to choose to be authentic, to move forward and create anew future in spite of one’s shadow or “daimonic”. Courage is the best expression ofauthenticity, and is at the very heart of the creative process, which always involvesexistential encounters with anxiety and fear. The authentic individuals are free to create,because they have the courage to confront and accept their self-doubts and anxiety.Freedom means the liberty to choose, to design one’s own future, in spite of inherentlimitations, which May (1999) calls destiny. May is able to shift from determinism to

Existential Theories 19destiny by recognizing our capacity for freedom and intentionality in spite of internal andexternal limitations. To May, destiny means both throwness and the

Different from other European existential psychologists, Viktor Frankl (1905-1997) was the first to emphasize positive existential givens. This is remarkable, because personally he experienced more horrors and sufferings than any of the other existential philosophers and psychologists. Frankl spent 1942-1945 in Nazi concentration camps.

Related Documents:

4 Abstract This thesis carries out an existential analysis of Samuel Beckett's Waiting for Godot and Franz Kafka's The Metamorphosis through the complex lenses of existential absurdity and alienation and analyses how the use of these existential notions reflects relevant exis

Nick Bostrom University of Oxford Abstract Existential risks are those that threaten the entire future of humanity. Many theories of value imply that even relatively small reductions in net existential risk have enormous expected value. Despite their importance, issues surrounding human-extinction risks and related hazards remain poorly understood.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY 63-81 Learning Objectives 63 Key Terms 63 Role Theories 65 Motivational Theories 67 Learning Theories 69 Cognitive Theories 73 Symbolic Interaction Theories 75 Socio-Cultural Theories 77 Evolutionary Theories 78 Summary and review 80 review QueStionS 81 4. SELF AND IDENTITY 82-107

Counselling at the Existential Academy in London, where she is Principal. Her best sellers include Everyday Mysteries (Routledge), Paradox and Passion in Psychotherapy (Wiley), and Existential Counselling and Psychotherapy in Practice (Sage). Editors Erik Craig is an existential psychol

special existential dichotomy of nature and culture, and in the personality theory of Alfred Adler towards more special existential dichotomy of superiority and com-munity. objectives The main objective of this article is to show that the new existential criterion of nor-mal and abnormal personality based on the works of Fromm is implicitly present

2. To obtain the Dimensions of Existential Relatedness and Growth needs. 3.Erg Motivational Needs (Alderfer's Erg Model): The acronym ERG stands for three groups of fundamental needs, they are Existential, Relatedness and Growth needs. These needs are line up with the Malow‟s hierarchy of needs. But Alderfer developed the needs into a

2 S o c i a l T h e o r i e s Theories can be used to study society—millions of people in a state, country, or even at the world level. When theories are used at this level they are referred to as macro-level theories, theories which best fit the study of massive numbers of people (typically Conflict and Functional theories).

This standard employs the principles of API 650; however, storage tank owner/operators, based on consideration of specific construction and operating details, may apply this standard to any steel tank constructed in accordance with a tank specification. This standard is intended for use by organizations that maintain or have access to engineering and inspection personnel technically trained .