Research On Calculation Method Of Wave Load And Mooring .

3y ago
21 Views
3 Downloads
1.38 MB
8 Pages
Last View : 30d ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Joanna Keil
Transcription

JournaloOPENentgemnaefense MafDISSN: 2167-0374ACCESS Freely available onlineJournal ofDefense ManagementResearch ArticleResearch on Calculation Method of Wave Load and Mooring Force Basedon Time Domain Potential Flow TheoryZhang Bao-Ji*, Ning Ping-Bo and Zhang ChiCollege of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, P.R. ChinaABSTRACTIn order to predict the wave force of moored ships quickly and accurately, based on the unsteady time domain flowtheory, the calculation method of wave load and mooring force of LNG ship under full load and ballast conditionsis studied. Through short-term forecasting and long-term forecasting, the wave bending moment and wave force ofeach cross section of the LNG ship, as well as the motion response of LNG ship which have the greatest influence onthe wave load are obtained. Based on this, the wave force and motion response is performed, and the mooring pointis set according to the actual environmental conditions when the LNG ship is moored at the dock. The mooringforce of each cable that meets the specifications and the number of mooring lines required are finally obtained. Theresearch results in this paper can provide a technical support for dock mooring setup and mooring force calculationfor similar ship types.Keywords: Wave load; Time domain; Mooring calculation; Wave forceINTRODUCTIONShips or marine structures can be affected by the marineenvironment when they are moored at docks or at sea, generatingsome forces and reaction forces such as wind, waves, currents andtides. Under the influence of these external forces, the ship willproduce 6 Degrees of Freedom motion (6-DOF), such as: heave,pitch, sway, roll, yaw, and sway. In addition, it will be affected bypassing ships. Moreover, the nonlinearity of mooring lines andfender materials, as well as the tension and slack of the cables, canmake the calculation of mooring forces very difficult [1]. At present,the design and calculation of mooring mainly rely on methods suchas field observation, physical model test and numerical simulation.Although the model test is accurate, it is difficult to capture somecomplicated physical phenomena, especially the long experimentalperiod and high cost. It is difficult for some preliminary designersand researchers to accept. Therefore, numerical simulation shouldbe the main means to study the mooring calculation. Especiallyin recent years, some large-scale commercial software has comeout one after another. It is a trend to use software to calculatemooring. In foreign countries, as early as the 1970s, mathematicalmodels were used to predict the motion response and mooringforce of dock mooring vessels under wind and current. Natarrajanet al. used a combination of numerical simulation and physicalmodel tests to conduct a comprehensive numerical simulationand experiment on a certain wave height and different periodof the marine environment and obtained satisfactory results [2].Kreruzer proposed a cable dynamic analysis model [3]; Wicherset al. developed a fully coupled time-domain numerical model tostudy the coupling effects of deep-water mooring lines and riserdrag coefficients on the movement of floating bodies and thetension of mooring lines [4];Sphaier et al. solved the static problemof turret FPSO mooring system by using simplified equation ofship motion [5];Kim et al. studied the coupled motion of thehull and mooring of the turret FPSO by experimental methods.Domestic researchers' mooring calculations are based primarilyon potential flow theory and large commercial software [6]. Hu Yiused Seasam software to study the hydrodynamic performance oflarge LNG ships, and used AQWA software to study the mooringforce calculation of LNG ships [7]. Yu Yang from the static pointof view, does not consider the impact of cable tensile deformation,the cable tension is analyzed [8]; Xiang Yi used the Monte Carloalgorithm and the chaotic solution to simulate the tension of themooring ship ropes, and compared with the experimental values,and obtained consistent results [9,10];Li Wei studied the variationof the force of the cable and the fender with the wind and wavedirection and the wind direction by testing the large wind andwave mooring model of a 175,000-ton bulk carrier [11]. Jiang Qingtook the Dalian Ore Terminal as an example, and measured thecable pulling force in the 90-degree range and the 2.25 m intervalin all directions, and the ship was berthed by physical model test[12]. Liu Bi-Jin and Zhang Yi-Fei through theoretical analysis ofCorrespondence to: Zhang Bao-Ji, Professor, College of Ocean Science and Engineering, Shanghai Maritime University, Shanghai 201306, P.R. ChinaTelephone: 86-21-38282504; E-mail: zbj1979@163.comReceived: May 10, 2019; Accepted: May 21, 2019; Published: May 28, 2019Citation: Bao-Ji Z, Ping-Bo N, Chi Z (2019) Research on Calculation Method of Wave Load and Mooring Force Based on Time Domain Potential FlowTheory. J Def Manag. 9:180; doi: 10.35248/2167-0374.19.180Copyright: 2019 Bao-Ji Z, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the term of the Creative Commons Attribution License, whichpermits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.J Def Manag, Vol. 9 Iss. 1 No: 1801

Bao-Ji Z, et al.OPENthe ship under mooring conditions summarized the main factorsaffecting the mooring force of the ship [13]. Under differentworking conditions, the cable of each position of the ship wasanalyzed under different wave height and periodic environment.The variation of the tether force also considers the influence ofthe wave angle on the tether force. Zou Zhi-Li introduced the basiccharacteristics of soft steel arm mooring and the importance ofaccurately calculating its mooring force [14]. Taking FPSO in BohaiSea as an example, analyzing its force and establishing the equationof the force and moment, after various calculations and analysis,verifies the reliability and practicability of its dynamic analysismethod. Based on the previous research results and experience,this paper studies the wave load of LNG ships under full loadand ballast conditions based on the unsteady time domain flowtheory. Through short-term forecasting and long-term forecasting,the wave bending moment and wave force are obtained, and thenthe 6-DOF motion performance is performed to obtain the swayacceleration and the surging acceleration which have the greatestinfluence on the wave load. Based on this, the calculation of thewave force is carried out. According to the actual environmentalconditions of the LNG ship dock mooring, the mooring point issteed. After many calculations and modifications of the mooringpoint setting, each of the specifications is finally obtained. Themooring force of the root cable and the number of mooring cablesrequired. The research results in this paper can provide theoreticalcalculation methods for the dock mooring setting and mooringforce calculation of similar ship types.BASIC THEORYSolution of unsteady disturbance potentialDefine zero-speed radiation potential ф0j(x, y, z) and speedadditional velocity potential k0j(x, y, z), so that it satisfies thecontinuous equation and the bottom condition, free surfacecondition, remote radiation condition and the surface conditiondefined by the following formula [15]: 0φj (x ,y ,z ) nj ,(j 1,2, ,6) n Uφj (x ,y ,z ) m j ,(j 1,2, ,6) n(1)Then the radiation potential фj(x, y, z) can be decomposed into thesum of the radiation potential ф0j(x, y, z) without speed and theadditional velocity potential фUj (x, y, z) with speed, namely:φ j ( x, y, z ) φ 0j ( x, y, z ) U Uφ j ( x, y, z ), j 1,2, ,6iω(2)where,0j 1,2,3,4 0φ ( x, y, z ) φ3 ( x, y, z )j 5 φ 0 ( x, y , z )j 62 Uj(3)For the above solution problem, each disturbance potential фj(x, y,z) can be determined by an appropriate numerical solution method.After disturbance potential фj(x, y, z) defined, the generalizedadditional mass coefficient and the generalized wave-dampingcoefficient can be obtained by the following formula:mij ρ Re(φ j )ni dssHN ij ρω Im(ϕ j )ni ds(4)ACCESS Freely available onlineThe resilience coefficient can be obtained by the following formula:C33 ρ gA C35 C53 ρ gS y C ρg h ρg(J z z )44xxBG C55 ρ g hy ρ g ( J y z B zG ) (5)where, A is the waterline area of the ship at equilibrium;Sy is thestatic moment for the y-axis;Jx and Jy is the moment of inertia for thex and y axes; is the ship's drainage volume; zB and zG is the verticalcoordinates of the ship's center of gravity and center of gravity;hxand hy is the ship's horizontal stability and vertical stability arehigh. From the linearized Bernoulli equation, the hydrodynamicpressure after the hydrostatic pressure change is subtracted is: P( x, y, z , t ) Re { p ( x, y, z ) eiωt } ρ (iω Up ( x, y , z , ) )[ϕ I ( x, y, z ) ϕ D ( x, y, z ) ϕ R ( x, y, z )] x(6)The hydrodynamic forces and moments acting on the hull can beintegrated by the above-mentioned hydrodynamic pressure alongits average wet surface S:F(t ) nPdSS(t )m 0 (r n)PdS(7)SCatenary modelThe catenary mooring cable has a standard quasi-static modelequation, which is based on the vertical gravity action of themooring cable to resist the resilience of the environmental load ofthe platform, whose equation is [16]:I w h(h 2THTW) l ' H sinh 1 (WWTHh(h 2TH) 0W(8)In Eq. (8), lw is the working length of cable when not stretched l’is the length of cable after stretching, h is the water depth, TH isthe cable tension, w is the gravity of the unit catenary line in thewater. Catenary model is very effective in shallow water mooringcalculation, so it has been widely used. This paper studies themooring calculation of shallow water in a water depth of 30 m, sothe catenary model is used.CALCULATION OF THE WAVE LOAD ANDMOTION RESPONSETaking a LNG ship as an example, the ship's wave load is predictedby time domain potential flow theory, and the safety of the ship isanalyzed and verified. The dock mooring design is carried out tocalculate the mooring force of each cable based on the wave loadand compare it with the specification value to verify the reliabilityof the mooring method. The main dimensions of the LNG ship areshown in Table 1. Different wave directions and wave frequencieshave different effects on the radiation and diffraction of the ship,which affects the amplitude response of the RAO. The ship has atotal of 0 , 30 , 60 , 90 , 120 , 150 , and 180 wave directions. The0 direction is the ship's corresponding wave condition, and the90 direction is the ship's starboard side wave. The 180 direction isthe case where the ship is facing the waves. The wave frequency isset from 0.1 rad/s to 1.8 rad/s for a total of 35 frequencies with aninterval of 0.05 rad/s. The wave uses JONSWAP (γ 1).sHJ Plant Pathol Microbiol, Vol. 10 Iss. 4 No: 4802

Bao-Ji Z, et al.OPENWave load calculationFigure 1 is a distribution diagram of the wave bending momentof the ship. It can be seen from the figure that the vertical wavebending moment of the LNG ship is the largest when the waveangle is 0o-30o, that is, when the ship is sailing with the wave, itswave bending moment is larger than other wave angles. When theship is sailing on a transverse wave, that is, when the wave angleis 90o, the ship receives the minimum wave bending moment.Figure 2 is a wave shear distribution diagram of the ship. It canbe seen from the figure that when the ship's wave angle is 180o,the ship receives the maximum wave shear force. When the ship'swave angle is 120o, that is, when the ship approaches the transversewave, its wave shear force is the smallest.Motion response analysisFigures 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 are motion response curve of LNG shipin irregular wave, it can be seen from the picture and LNG carrierhas large motion amplitude in the low frequency range. The surgeRAO curve and sway RAO curve of the LNG ship is the largestwhen the frequency is 0.05 rad/s. The roll RAO curve and pitchRAO curve of the LNG ship is the largest when the frequency is 0.6rad/s. The heave RAO curve of the LNG ship is the largest whenthe frequency is 0.8 rad/s.CALCULATION OF THE MOORING FORCECalculation of minimum breaking force of mooring ropeIn order to calculate the force and moment generated by the shipACCESS Freely available onlineunder the combined action of wind and current, the minimumbreaking force of each mooring line is calculated based on thetheory of time domain potential flow, which lays a foundationfor the subsequent mooring design and calculation. The airdensity ρA 1.28kg/m3 and the seawater density ρw 1025kg/m3.The calculation conditions of the specific dock mooring forceare shown in Table 2. All the calculated pitch angles are 0 in themooring state.Calculated according to 14 broken cables:Σy 2276 0.875A 14 0.158 0A 2276/(0.875 14 0.158 0) 185.8 kNAccording to the specification, each rope can withstand up to 55%of the tension, so the minimum breaking force of each cable isMBL 185.8/0.55 337.8kN:Σx 651 0.893A 0 0.235A 16A 651/(0.893 0 0.235 16) 173 kNAccording to the specification, each rope can withstand up to 55%of the tension, so the minimum breaking force of each cable isMBL 173/0.55 314 kN. Table 3 shows the wind receiving area,maximum longitudinal force and lateral force of the LNG shipunder full load and ballast conditions. The minimum breakingforce of each rope is MBL 314 kN, so the minimum breaking loadof the cable is 314 x1.0 314 kN. Therefore, as long as the minimumbreaking of the actually taken mooring cable is not more than 314kN and is greater than the minimum breaking force required inthe calculation of the number of armors, it is satisfactory. TheOverall length /mLength between perpendiculars /mBreath/mDraft/mBallast draft /mFull load draft /m195.3184.830206.72310.3Table 1: The main dimensions of the LNG.Figure 1: Vertical wave bending moment of LNG ship.Figure 3: Surge RAO.Figure 2: Vertical wave shear of LNG ship.Figure 4: Sway RAO.J Plant Pathol Microbiol, Vol. 10 Iss. 4 No: 4803

Bao-Ji Z, et al.OPENACCESS Freely available onlinethis paper, the LNG ship first considers the axial direction of thethree wind directions and the wave direction of 0 , 90 and 150 .The Jonswap wave spectrum is used. The specific environmentalsettings are shown in Figures 8, 9, 10 and Table 4 are Waveforms inan environmental state.mooring calculation can be performed by substituting the abovewind receiving area and wave load data into the mooring forcecalculation program.LNG ship mooring arrangement and preliminarycalculationCable guide hole setting for LNG shipsEnvironmental settings for LNG shipsAccording to the OCIMF MEG3 (2008) specification, the initialmooring settings are shown in Figure 11. After calculation, themaximum axial force of the cable under ballast, full load conditionsand different environments is shown in Table 5, and the maximumvalue appears as shown in Figures 12 and 13. Through the analysisof the above axial force, it is found that under each workingcondition, the maximum axial force is greater than the previouslycalculated 314 KN as shown in Table 5, which means that the shiphas safety hazards in this mooring setting state and does not meetthe design requirements. In addition, it can be seen that underdifferent wind directions and working conditions, the maximumaxial force of the ship mooring rope appears on different anchorchains, which proves that the ship is not only affected by differentworking conditions during the mooring process. It is also affectedby environmental loads. In order to ensure the safety of the mooringship, three wind directions (wave directions) were considered inthe subsequent mooring setting.Environmental factors must be considered when designing themooring system for LNG carriers. For ships of more than 16,000DWT in global trade, effective and reasonable mooring settingscan guarantee stability and safety. When a natural gas carrierexceeds 150 meters, environmental standards must be met. InMooring position adjustmentFigure 5: Heave RAO.After repeated calculations, comparisons and analysis, the ship'sguide whole position is unchanged, but four fender points areadded to ensure that the ship's wharf is moored, and the impactbetween the hull and the wharf is affected by wind, waves andcurrent. Increase the cushioning force and reduce the damage tothe hull. The position of the fender point is selected according tothe mooring setting map. Because the water depth is 20 meters,the vertical position Z of the fender point is taken as 20 meters.The fender points and the relative positions of the 14 cables areshown in Figure 14. In Figure 14, there is an anchor point undereach fender point to better secure the ship. And as can be seenfrom the Figure, the ship has a total of 14 cables, including 2 firstcables, 6 horizontal cables, 4 inverted cables, and 2 tail cables.Figure 6: Roll RAO.Environmental adjustmentDue to environmental factors, the ship's mooring safety has a greatimpact. To ensure safety, the original 0 , 90 , 150 directions aremodified to 0 , 30 , 45 , 60 , 90 . The six directions of 150 , thedetailed settings are shown in Table 6. As can be seen from thetable, in this adjustment plan, the ship adjusts the wind speedto the maximum wind speed specified in the design book andperforms the mooring calculation in the worst environmentalconditions, which is more helpful for the safety of the ship.Adjusted calculation resultAfter the calculation of the environment, cable material and theaddition of the fender point of the LNG ship, the final axial forceFigure 7: Pitch RAO.Draft(m)Structural draft10.3Environment factorsBallastdraftWind (m/s)6.2630.87Depth to draft ratioAngle and speed of the currentFull load0 10 50 90 180 1.541.031.030.3861.54ballast1.1Table 2: Dock mooring calculation conditions.J Plant Pathol Microbiol, Vol. 10 Iss. 4 No: 4804

Bao-Ji Z, et al.ConditionsBallastOPENLongitudinal wind area AL(m2) Lateral wind area AT(m2)3203ACCESS Freely available onlineMaximum longitudinal force FXmax Maximum transverse(KN)FYmax(KN)873full load2449751Table 3: Ship's force and wind receiving area under two working conditions.65121655362276forceFigure 8: 0 wind direction and the environmental state of the wave.Figure 10: 150 wind direction and environmental conditions of the wave.Figure 9: 90 wind direction and environmental conditions of the wave.Figure 11: 150 wind direction and environmental conditions of the wave.Figure 12: Maximum axial force of the cables on different wind directions and wave under ballast conditions.J Plant Pathol Microbiol, Vol. 10 Iss. 4 No: 4805

Bao-Ji Z, et al.OPENWaveACCESS Freely available onlineWindCurrentSignificant wave heightZero-crossing periodWave directionWind speedWind directionCurrent speed1.5 m7.5 s0º10.29 m/s0º1.54 m/sCurrent direction0º0.3 m9.0 s90º7.72 m/s90º0.39 m/s90º1.2 m7.5 s150º10.29 m/s150º1.03 m/s150ºTable 4: Specific environment setting of the LNG ship.DirectionBallastFull load0 533.578460.94990 400.933537.345150 459.014539.277Table 5: Maximum axial force (N).Figure 13: Maximum axial force of the cables on different wind directions and wave under full load conditions.Figure 14: Cable and fender point location.J Plant Pathol Microbiol, Vol. 10 Iss. 4 No: 4806

Bao-Ji Z, et al.OPENWaveSignificant waveheightZero-crossing periodACCESS Freely available onlineWindWave directionWind speedCurrentWind directionCurrent speedCurrent direction1.5 m7.5 s0º30.87 m/s0º1.54 m/s0º1.2 m7.5 s30º30.87 m/s30º1.03 m/s30º45º1.0 m8s45º30.87 m/s45º1.38 m/s0.7 m8s60º30.87 m/s60º1.76 m/s60º0.3 m9s90º30.87 m/s90º0.386 m/s90º1.2 m7.5 s150º30.87 m/s150º1.03 m/s150ºTable 6: LNG45 ship environment setting.Figure 15: Axial force distribution of each cable under full load and ballast conditions.calculation results under the two working

by time domain potential flow theory, and the safety of the ship is analyzed and verified. The dock mooring design is carried out to calculate the mooring force of each cable based on the wave load and compare it with the specification value to verify the reliability of the mooring method. The main dimensions of the LNG ship are shown in Table 1.

Related Documents:

EPA Test Method 1: EPA Test Method 2 EPA Test Method 3A. EPA Test Method 4 . Method 3A Oxygen & Carbon Dioxide . EPA Test Method 3A. Method 6C SO. 2. EPA Test Method 6C . Method 7E NOx . EPA Test Method 7E. Method 10 CO . EPA Test Method 10 . Method 25A Hydrocarbons (THC) EPA Test Method 25A. Method 30B Mercury (sorbent trap) EPA Test Method .

calculation algorithms when a clinical trial protocol is proposed while different TPS or dose calculation algo- rithms are correlated with this protocol. In this paper, we present a practical method to measure and evaluate dose calculation algorithms and to commis- sion dose calculation models in a TPS. For example, in

American code ANSI /AISC 360-10 gives two verification options: LRFD and ASD. In Robot program you always have to manually adjust : 1. calculation method, 2. load code combination appropriate for calculation method ad.1 calculation method Calculation method (LRF

7 1-7. Calculation functions The available calculation functions are Statistical Calculation and Calculation between Channels. Statistical Calculation allows you to check the maximum, minimum, and average values of all the channels as numeric

The Problem with Root Cause Analysis Method A Method B Method C Method G Method E Method H Method J Method F Method D Method I No‐one can agree on "what is a root cause." Everyone says they do "root cause analysis,"yet everyone is doing something different!

0.1.2 Calculation Example A strength calculation for the following shaft-hub-connection is required (see also DIN 6892, Example E.2). Enter the following values into the input elds: Shaft diameter 60 mm Application factor 1.75 Outer diameter hub D 2 120 mm Calculation method B Oper

4. The hydraulic calculation method used in energyPRO 4.1 Restrictions in the hydraulic calculation The transmission temperatures are decided as external conditions, i.e., no tempera-ture optimization is included. 4.2 Input for the hydraulic calculation 4.2.1 General constants - Specific heat capacity of water, Cp - Density of water, ρ

EN 12828, Heating systems in building – Design for water based heating systems EN 12831, Heating systems in buildings - Method for calculation of the design heat load. EN 15316-1, Heating systems in buildings - Method for calculation of system energy requirements and system efficiencies – Part 1: General