Ford Motor Company APQP Guideline - WordPress

3y ago
26 Views
2 Downloads
584.00 KB
83 Pages
Last View : 1m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Sutton Moon
Transcription

Ford Motor CompanyAdvanced Product Quality Planning (APQP)Status Reporting GuidelineAny questions regarding this document, or the content therein,should be directed to:VO Quality Office(313) 248-6538This document is located on the Ford Intranet at:http://www.dearborn2.ford.com/apqpcntrThis Guideline is published by Ford Motor Company, Quality OfficeCopyright 2001 Ford Motor Company.All rights reservedAdvanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 1 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

ForewordFord Motor Company launched an Advanced Product Quality Planning StatusReporting Guideline (APQP) Fast Start Initiative in December 1994. A crossfunctional APQP team formed to review the existing FAO Procedures and targetbest practices. The 1994 version of this document was created at that time, tobe in line with the AIAG Advanced Product Quality Planning and Control PlanManual.Since that time, the external suppliers to Ford Motor Company, and internalsuppliers within Ford have used the FAO APQP Status Reporting Guideline tomonitor their own systems with regard to APQP.With the experience that has been acquired since 1994, it has becomenecessary to update this manual to reflect current practices, and successes. Inaddition, the Ford Product Development System (FPDS) has become thedocumented system for the Product Development processes within Ford(replacing World Class Timing).A cross-functional team was formed in 1999/2000 to review the 1994 FAO APQPmanual and practices, and this guideline has been updated to reflect generictiming with respect to the FPDS system. It also contains references (at the timeof publishing) to the FPDS Process Sheets. All of this is to clarify further theappropriateness of the APQP process, and its direct tie to the existingsystems/process Ford currently has in place.Furthermore, it is intended that the updated APQP process and FPDS timinginformation will assist the external supply base in understanding the differencesbetween their own timing requirements, and those which need to be met by theentire Vehicle Program in the delivery of a new vehicle.This Guideline documents the Ford APQP evaluation and status reportingprocess and is intended to be used for 2004 MY Programs and beyond. ThisGuideline does not replace the AIAG Advanced Product Quality Planning andControl Plan Reference Manual as the basis for quality planning.Advanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 2 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

Table of ContentsFOREWORD. 2APQP FUNDAMENTALS. 5APQP Process Flow Map . 6Fundamentals of the APQP Process. 7APQP REPORTING PROCESS. 10APQP Status Reporting Process Flow Chart . 11APQP Status Report. 12APQP Status Report Form . 13Filling Out the Status Report Form . 14Quality of Event Checklists. 15Risk Assessment . 15APQP TIMING . 17Ford / Supplier Systems "V" Model . 18APQP Generic Program Timing Gantt Chart. 19APQP ELEMENTS . 21Sourcing Decision. 22Customer Input Requirements . 23Craftsmanship . 24Design Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (DFMEA). 25Design / Manufacturing Reviews . 27Design Verification Plan & Report (DVP&R) . 28Sub-Contractor APQP Status . 29Facilities / Tools / Gauges . 30Prototype Build Control Plan . 32Prototype Builds . 33Drawings & Specifications . 34Team Feasibility Commitment . 36Manufacturing Process Flow . 38Process Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (PFMEA) . 40Measurement System Evaluation. 42Pre-Launch Control Plan . 44Operator Process Instructions . 45Packaging Specifications. 46Production Trial Run. 47Production Control Plan. 48Preliminary Process Capability. 49Production Validation Testing. 50Part Submission Warrant (PSW). 51APPENDIX SECTION. 52APPENDIX A:APQP ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES. 53Powertrain Roles and Responsibilities Matrix . 54Advanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 3 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

Powertrain Roles and Responsibilities Matrix. 55Powertrain Program Review Process. 56(PTPRP) . 56STA Roles & Responsibilities . 57EXTERNAL SUPPLIERS . 67APPENDIX B:RELATED FORMS. 69APPENDIX C:GLOSSARY OF TERMS. 72APPENDIX D:REFERENCES AND WEBSITES . 79REFERENCES & WEB SITES . 80Advanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 4 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

APQP FundamentalsAdvanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 5 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

APQP Process Flow MapAPQP PROCESS FLOWC R A F T S M A N S H IPD R A W IN G S / S P E C IF IC A T IO N SP - D ia g r a mS O U R C IN GD E C IS IO ND E S IG N /M A N U F A C T U R IN GR E V IE W SF a ilu r e M o d e s &E r r o r S ta te sC U STO M ERIN P U TR E Q U IR E M E N T STEA MF E A S IB IL IT YC O M M IT M E N T(a ff e c t a ll A P Q Pe le m e n ts )S p e c if ic a t io n s &T a r g e ts(V D S /S D S /C D S )D E S IG N F A IL U R EM O D E EFFEC TA N A L Y S IS(D F M E A )D e s ig n in g o f th eV e h ic le / S y s te m /S u b s y s te m /C om ponentF E E D IN F O R M A T IO NFO R W A R DF E E D IN F O R M A T IO NB A C KD E S IG NV E R IF IC A T IO NP L A N (D V P )D R A W IN G S /S P E C IF IC A T IO N S(P a p e r / E le c tr o n ic )F A C IL IT IE S /TO O LS/G A U G ESM A N U F A C T U R IN GPR O C ESS FLO WM EA SU R EM EN TS YS TE ME V A L U A T IO N(D i m e n si o n a lC o n tr o l )O PER A TO RPR O C ESSIN S T R U C T IO N S(P r o c e s sD e fin itio n )PR O C ESSF A IL U R E M O D EEFFEC TA N A L Y S IS(P F M E A )P R O TO TYP EB U IL D C O N T R O LPLA NP R O TO TYP EB U IL DP R E -L A U N C HC O N TR O L PLA NTIMEP R O D U C T IO NT R IA L R U NO PER A TO RPR O C ESSIN S T R U C T IO N S( V e r if ic a t io n &T r a in in g )P R O D U C T IO NC O N TR O L PLA NP R E L IM IN A R YPR O C ESSC A P A B IL IT YP R O D U C T IO NV A L ID A T IO NT E S T IN GPA R TS U B M IS S IO NW A R R A N T(P S W )Advanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 6 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

Fundamentals of the APQP ProcessAdvanced Product Quality Planning (APQP)Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) is a structured method for defining andexecuting the actions necessary to ensure a product satisfies the customer. APQP isprogram and supplier-led and is required of all system, subsystem and componentmanufacturing locations. This includes both internal and external suppliers to Ford.The Goal of APQPThe goal of APQP is to facilitate communication between all persons and activitiesinvolved in a program and ensure that all required steps are completed on time, with ahigh quality-of-event, at acceptable cost and quality levels.The Purpose of APQPThe purpose of this status reporting guideline is to establish:!"Common APQP expectations for the internal and external suppliers to FordMotor Company!"Common APQP process metrics!"A common program status reporting format!"Roles and responsibilities for APQP elements!"A better understanding of how the APQP elements relate to the Ford ProductDevelopment System (FPDS), specific FPDS milestones, and their timingThe Approach of APQPThis status reporting guideline describes 23 key APQP disciplines. Ford MotorCompany expectations are defined for these key disciplines in definitions, and detailedchecklists. The status for these disciplines is summarized using metrics described inthe Reporting section.This status reporting guideline is written from a supplier standpoint. A supplier is aninternal or external supplier of materials, components, subsystems, systems, designs orprocesses that will be delivered to a customer. A customer is the recipient of thesupplier's product or process. Besides customers, every supplier will havesubcontractors. A subcontractor is the provider of material or parts to a supplier.The Applicability of APQPAPQP status reporting is a requirement of all internal and external suppliers to Ford(including Ford Product Development). APQP must be done for new programs/partsand major part changes as appropriate. In addition, Product Development Teams are tomonitor the status of internal and external engineering and process developmentdisciplines and assess the "Quality-of-Event" as well as the timing and completion ofeach of the 23 elements.Advanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 7 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

TeamsThe first step in the Advanced Product Quality Planning Process is to assignresponsibility to a cross-functional team. Effective product quality planningrequires the involvement from all areas within a corporation. The team includesrepresentatives from engineering, manufacturing, material control, purchasing,quality, sales, field service, subcontractors, and customers as appropriate.ElementsThis Status Reporting Guideline describes 23 key APQP disciplines, identified asFord APQP elements. Please note that there is a slight difference in the 23elements in this updated version. These elements, when summarized andreported, communicate the status of different levels of a program.Of the 23 Ford APQP elements, 19 are requirements of the AIAG AdvancedProduct Quality Planning and Control Plan manual. The four additional elementsmeet unique Ford requirements for APQP status reporting and communicationbetween supplier and customer.The 19 industry standard elements are: Design FMEADesign Verification Plan &ReportPrototype Build Control PlanManufacturing Process FlowChartProcess FMEAPre-Launch Control PlanOperation ProcessInstructionsProduction Control PlanDesign & Mfg. Review(s) Facilities / Tools / GaugesThe four Ford unique elements are: Sourcing DecisionCustomer Input RequirementsAdvanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001) Prototype BuildsDrawings and SpecificationsTeam FeasibilityCommitmentMeasurement SystemsEvaluationPackaging SpecificationsProduction Trial RunPreliminary ProcessCapability StudyProduction Validation TestingProduction Part Approval(PSW)Subcontractor APQP StatusCraftsmanship (note: new thisrelease)Page 8 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

Elements (cont.)Another difference from the original status reporting guideline, is the combinationof the two elements for "Production Part Approval (PSW)" and "PSW partdelivery at MRD" into one element called: Part Submission Warrant (PSW)APQP FlowThe chart on the page 6 of this section is an overall summary of the APQPprocess. It is intended to show that APQP is NOT just a feed forward process,but it also includes feeding information back, updating documents in an iterativefashion, and using information and lessons learned from a program for futureprograms.The APQP Process includes five main functions:1. Planning of the APQP elements2. Execution of the APQP elements3. Monitoring the "Quality-of-Event" of the execution of the elements, as well asthe timing, by the team in-between FPDS milestones4. Issues Resolution5. Status Reporting (minimum at FPDS milestones)RolesThe roles matrix in Appendix A defines the lead and support roles for VehicleOperations and Product Development. Under the VO/PD matrix, the APQPStatus Reporting is as follows: Vehicle Operations Program Launch Managerreports the status on VO Internal Suppliers, and Product Development TeamLeaders will report on the D & R Engineers' status. Powertrain will report bothInternal & External P/T Suppliers (see Powertrain R & R matrix for further detail).STA will report status on External SuppliersThis Roles and Responsibilities matrix can be used to derive other tables specificto each organization's requirements for element responsibility and statusreporting.ResponsibilitiesResponsibilities for the activities are identified in the checklist, and references toFPDS process sheets are in the element descriptions. A Quality-of-Eventchecklist is provided for each element to assist in understanding the Expectationsfor each element. Rating history, FPDS timing requirements, and Expectationsdue at certain points in the program are described.Advanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 9 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

APQP ReportingProcessAdvanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 10 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

APQP Status Reporting Process Flow ChartAdvanced Product Quality PlanningRelease Level: 3.0Ford APQP Guideline (copyright , 2001)Page 11 of 83March 2001Uncontrolled Copy

APQP Status ReportThe Ford APQP Status Report summarizes the program status using the 23 Ford APQPelements. It summarizes the information and provides an assessment at thecomponent/subsystem level, the system/organization level(s), and finally the programlevel. The individual issues at each level are to be documented and tracked, as well asraised to management for assistance in solving/closing if they cannot be handled at theworking level.Please note the different levels of reporting, and the summarizing process as shown onpage11. Submit the Status Report to the customer at all major program reviews (e.g. FPDSMilestones).Customers or suppliers shall conduct more frequent status reviews as needed.The customer shall provide a list of all scheduled program status review dates to thesupplier.Submit supporting documentation upon customer request.The subsystem team completes the status report for its product, with componentsupplier status summarized on the Subcontractor APQP status line. The subsystemteams submit the report to their customer, the system team.The system/organization team will then complete the status report for their product, withtheir subsystem supplier status summarized onto the Subcontractor APQP status line.The system teams submit the data to their customer, the vehicle team.Ratings and AssessmentG/Y/R StatusGreen-Yellow-Red status communicates the progress toward the successful completionof an APQP Element by the program need date. Program need date is the last possibledate an element can be completed and not adversely affect quality or timing of theprogram. The “GYR Status” column of the report shows the assessment for eachelement.Definitions/Risk

With the experience that has been acquired since 1994, it has become necessary to update this manual to reflect current practices, and successes. In addition, the Ford Product Development System (FPDS) has become the documented system for the Product Development processes within Ford (replacing World Class Timing).

Related Documents:

includes feeding information back, updating documents in an iterative fashion, and using information and lessons learned from a program for future programs. The APQP Process includes five main functions: 1. Planning of the APQP elements 2. Execution of the APQP elements 3. Monitoring the "Q

2020 2022 FORD Explorer Yes No 2018 2019 FORD Explorer Yes 2019 2021 FORD Eco Sport Yes 2019 2019 FORD Fiesta Yes 2018 2019 FORD Flex Yes 2019 2019 FORD Focus Yes 2019 2020 FORD Fusion Yes 2021 2022 FORD F 150 Yes 2015 2020 FORD F 150 Yes FORD Mustang MACH-E Yes 2018 2021 FORD Super Duty Yes

entitled “1984 Ford Econoline Van”. Ford Motor Company; excerpts from product brochure entitled “1984 Ford Club Wagon”. Ford Motor Company; excerpts from product brochure entitled “Introducing the all trim—siZe 1984 Ford Bronco II”. Ford Motor Company; excerpts from product brochure entitled “1984 Ford Bronco II”.

A cross-functional team was formed in 1999/2000 to review the 1994 FAO APQP manual and practices, and this guideline has been updated to reflect generic timing with respect to the FPDS system. It also contains references (at the time of publishing) to the FPDS Process Sheets. All of this is to clarify further the

pickup pickup pickup pickup pickup s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 s10 silverado silverado silverado silverado silverado silverado silverado silverado silverado silverado venture . 85 ford . 86 ford . 87 ford . 88 ford . 89 ford . 90 ford . 91 ford . 92 ford . 93 ford . 94 ford . 95 gmc 96 gmc 97 gmc 98 gmc 99 gmc 100 gmc

ford 4.6 - 16 valves - ford 4.6l/5.4l - sohc 24 valves 42 ford 4.6 - 32 valves 43 ford 351 c (2 barrel) - ford 351 n (sportsman head) 43 ford 351 w & gt40 head 43 ford 429 - 460 w/aftermarket heads 43 ford boss 302 - 351 c - 429 - 460 43 ford fe 352 -390 427 428 ford windsor 302 351 43 pontiac 400 -428 455 43 valves (5000 series hi performance) 44

Lake Powell Ford Page AZ 86040 Galpin Ford Prescott AZ 86305 Glenn Jones Ford Casa Grande AZ 85122 McSpadden Ford, Inc. Globe AZ 85501 Tate's Auto Center Holbrook AZ 86025 Horne Ford of Nogales, LLC Nogales AZ 85621 Freedom Ford Lincoln Thatcher AZ 85552 Oracle Ford Oracle AZ 85623 Lawley's Team Ford Sierra Vista AZ 85635 Show Low Ford Show Low .

This statement provides information required for these disclosures and provides guidance to other stakeholders of the Ford Motor Company, subsidiaries, and affiliates. Unless otherwise specified, reference to "Ford", "we", "us" or "our" refer to Ford Motor Company, subsidiaries, and affiliates. Ford Motor Company Overview