Airport Pavement Federal Aviation Design & Evaluation

3y ago
40 Views
6 Downloads
1.19 MB
24 Pages
Last View : Today
Last Download : Today
Upload by : Vicente Bone
Transcription

Airport PavementDesign & EvaluationDraft AC 150/5320-6FFAARFIELD SoftwareACC Summer WorkshopAugust 10, 2016Washington, DCPresented by: Doug Johnson, P.E.FAA, Airports, AAS-100Sr. Civil Engineer - PavementFederal AviationAdministration

Overview Current Status AC 150/5320-6F– Internal and Industry CommentsIncorporated– Currently at Technical Editor– Next step Legal Review– Anticipate IssuingLate September / Early OctFederal AviationAdministration

Principal Changes FAARFIELD v 1.41 (ver 1.41.0010 latest) Revised failure curves added compaction computation Pavement Design Report saved as pdf Reformatted to comply with Order 1320.46Text & Examples updatedDefine Regular UseAdded discussion on Structural Life &Functional Life Tables for Minimum Layer Thickness asopposed to light & otherFederal AviationAdministration

Selection of Pavement Type(Draft AC 5320-6F)It is your job as Engineer to document the rationale for theselection of pavement type, section and service life.Federal AviationAdministration

Selection of Pavement Type Alternative Pavement Sections– Assumed all will achieve desired result Cost Effectiveness Analysis––––Lowest total cost over life of projectChallenge User Cost ImpactsRoutine maintenance – marginal impactFocus on Initial Construction, preventativemaintenance and rehabilitation costsIt is your job as Engineer to document the rationale for theselection of pavement type, section and service life.Federal AviationAdministration

Selection of Pavement Type Reality –Funds Available is always a factor Just because LCCA supports sectiondoes not assure that funds available tosupport initial constructionFederal AviationAdministration

Subgrade Support Compaction Recommendations calculatedby FAARFIELD (draft AC 5320-6F)– Based upon Compaction Index (CI) concept– Minimum rework / re-compact top 12” in cuts plusany additional depth as calculated by FAARFIELD– Maximum depth of compaction 72” below finishedsubgrade Aircraft 60,000 lbs ASTM D 698 Aircraft 60,000 lbs ASTM D 1557Federal AviationAdministration

Stabilized Base Stabilized Base Required– Aircraft 100,000 lbs– Full Scale tests have proven superiorperformance with stabilized base– If less than 5% of traffic 100K but less than110k, may consider not using (still a goodidea to use)– Crushed aggregate with CBR 100 may besubstituted stabilized still better long termperformance.– Subbase under Stabilized base CBR 35Federal AviationAdministration

Pavement Life (6F) Design Life in FAARFIELD Structural Life Functional Life Period of time pavementable to provide acceptable service asmeasured by performance indicators such asforeign object debris (FOD), skid resistance orroughness. Typically design for 20 year structural life To achieve intended service life requires qualitymaterials and construction combined withroutine and preventative maintenanceFederal AviationAdministration

Aircraft Traffic Considerations Load– Maximum anticipated Departure (Takeoff) Weights– If arrival and departure at same weight or if noparallel taxiway may need to adjust number ofdepartures to match number of times pavement isloaded with each operation Volume– Annual Departures of Fleet– New in 6F ‘regular use 250 departures)– New in 6F ‘occasional use and seasonal’need to be documentedFederal AviationAdministration

FAARFIELD 1.4 – What’s New?FAARFIELD 1.4 has: Completely revised flexible and rigid failure modelsbased on newest full-scale test data. Improved, more accurate 3D finite element model. Completely rewritten concrete overlay design procedure. Support for user-defined gear configurations. Updated aircraft library aligned with COMFAA 3.0. Automated, software-based compaction criteria. All data files now stored in document directories. Automatically generates PDF design report.Federal AviationAdministration

Improved Rigid Failure Model Sensitivity to factors such as concrete strength, traffic level andsubgrade support is similar to current version.2018Concrete Thickness, in.16141210864200.010.11Traffic FactorFAARFIELD 1.305Effect of Concrete Flex Strength10FAARFIELD 1.41Effect of TrafficFederal AviationAdministration100

New Aggregate Modulus Model FAARFIELD 1.4 implementsa new sublayering andmodulus computationprocedure for aggregatesubbase (P-154 & P-209). Why?– Previous procedure (WESModulus subroutine) has gapsthat can cause illogical resultsunder some circumstances.– New model provides a continuousfunction of modulus with changesin P-154 thickness.– Better overall agreement with theP-209/P-154 equivalency factorused in PCN computations.Federal AviationAdministration

Automated Compaction CriteriaComputes compaction control points for rigid & flexible pavements.Federal AviationAdministration

Aircraft Libraries Aligned the aircraftlibraries in COMFAA andFAARFIELD to the extentpossible. Used the most currentdata from manufacturers. Multigear AC split intomain & belly, but link AC Included new aircraft:––––A350-900 (Preliminary)B747-8B787-9Embraer FleetFederal AviationAdministration

Airport Pavement DesignFederal AviationAdministration

Airport Pavement DesignAirport Pavement Thickness Design FAARFIELDFederal AviationAdministration

Allowable Modulus and Poisson RatiosAirport Pavement Thickness Design FAARFIELDFederal AviationAdministration

FAARFIELD Design Report Include copy of FAARFIELD Design Reportin Engineers Report Pavement Design Form no longer needed Still need to run COMFAA to determine PCNand use COMFAA support spreadsheet toget weight information for 5010(Future plans include FAARFIELD computing PCN, but this f(ICAO) adopting changes toACN/PCN process. FAA is currently working with ICAO on these changes)Federal AviationAdministration

Typical SectionNote Variablethickness surface stillan option, i.e exit TWjust arrival weight,keel full strengthtransitioning to 1%traffic on outer formiddle of RWNote 3: Base andsubbase minimum 12”up to 36” beyond fullstrengthAirport Pavement Thickness Design FAARFIELDFederal AviationAdministration

JointsSaw cut depthrecommendationsadded on joint detail:-T/4 on aggregate-T/3 on stabilized-T/5 or T/6 early entry-Preformed DetailFederal AviationAdministration21

Joints Sample PCC Joint Plans pdf or ent design/Federal AviationAdministration

JointsAirport Pavement Thickness Design FAARFIELDFederal AviationAdministration23

Questions?Doug Johnson, P.E.Doug.johnson@faa.gov(202) 267-4689Greg Cline, P.E.Gregory.cline@faa.gov(202) 267-8814Federal AviationAdministration

Draft AC 150/5320-6F FAARFIELD Software ACC Summer Workshop August 10, 2016 Washington, DC Presented by: Doug Johnson, P.E. FAA, Airports, AAS-100 Sr. Civil Engineer - Pavement. Federal Aviation Administration Overview

Related Documents:

AC 150/5320-6F 2016 Airport Pavement Design & Evaluation AC 150/5335-5C - 2014 Standardized Method of Reporting Airport Pavement Strength (PCN) AC 150/5320-5D - 2013 Surface Drainage Design AC 150/5320-12C * 1997 Measurement, Construction & Maintenance of Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces

Cathay Pacific Headquarters Changi Airport Chiang Kai-Shek Airport Dragon Air Headquarters Hong Kong International Airport Incheon Airport KAL Cargo Terminal Ninoy Aquino Airport Savarnabhumi Airport Soejkarno-Hatta Airport TaeGu Airport Wuxi Shuofang Airport Incheon, South Korea Brisbane, Australia Hong Kong, China

that airport capacity expansion decisions need to take into account a multi-airport perspective in assessing the value and timeliness of such investments. Planning scenarios based on calibrated airport choice model are developed to evaluate the market size of each airport. Keywords: Airport choice, Multi-airport region, Airport planning 1.

Airports in North Dakota are a combination of asphalt concrete (AC) pavement and Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement with there being slightly more AC pavement than PCC pavement. These two pavement types have unique pavement distresses and repairs. The following is a brief description of commonly observed

Pavement Design Basics Darlene Goehl, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. 2018 Transportation Short Course. October 16, 2018. Overview History of Pavement Design 3-6 Rigid Pavement Design 7-10 Flexible Pavement Design 11-14 Pavement and Mate

2.2 Modern Pavement Design 5 2.2.1 Early Modern Pavement Design ( 1775 to 1900 AD) 5 2.2.2 Modern Pavement Design (20th Century) 7 2.3 Flexible Pavement 8 2.3.1 Methods Based on Soil Properties 8 2.3.2 Performance-Based Pavement Design Methods 10 2.3.3 Empirical-Mechanistic Methods 15 2.3.4 Other Atte

The Miami-Dade Aviation Department (MDAD) operates the Miami-Dade County Airport System which consists of Miami International Airport (the Airport or MIA) and four general aviation (GA) and training airports: Miami-Opa locka Executive Airport (OPF), Miami Executive Airport (TMB), Miami Homestead General Aviation Airport (X51), and Dade-Collier .

on the airport. The signs are standardized in shape, color and meaning, but there use at uncontrolled airports will vary. In general, the larger the airport, the more signs used. Airport signs are positioned next to the runway, taxiway or ramp area. Airport markings are painted on the pavement. For mort information on airport pavement