Technological Challenges In Designing The Future Grid

2y ago
11 Views
2 Downloads
3.50 MB
119 Pages
Last View : 2m ago
Last Download : 3m ago
Upload by : Grady Mosby
Transcription

Technological Challenges in Designing the Future GridA Forum from the PSERC Future Grid InitiativeFunded by the Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability,U.S. Department of EnergyJune 27-28, 2012L'Enfant Plaza HotelWashington, D.C.Agenda.1Future Grid Initiative Overview .4Research Areas and Tasks .5Broad Analysis .6Bibliography .7About PSERC .8Presentations and Panelist Comments.11AgendaWednesday, June 277:15-8:00Registration. Coffee, Juice, Bagels, Fruit8:00-8:30IntroductionVijay Vittal, Professor, Arizona State University, and Director, Power SystemsEngineering Research Center8:30-8:45Role of the Future GridPatricia Hoffman, Assistant Secretary for Electricity Delivery and EnergyReliability, U.S. Department of Energy8:45-10:15Technology Session 1: Power Delivery InfrastructureOverview Presentation: Jerry Heydt, Arizona State UniversityDiscussion Panel:Flora Flygt, Strategic Planning & Policy Advisor, American Transmission Co.;Jim McCalley, Iowa State UniversityRobert Saint, Principal Engineer, National Rural Electric Cooperative AssociationPeter Sauer, University of Illinois at Urbana/ChampaignDiscussion Facilitator: Ward Jewell, Wichita State University10:15-10:45Break1

10:45-12:15Technology Session 2: Operations and PlanningOpening Presentation: Jim McCalley, Iowa State UniversityDiscussion Panel:George Angelidis, Principal, Power System Technology Development,California ISOGeorge Gross, University of Illinois at Urbana/ChampaignTim Ponseti, Vice President of Transmission Reliability, Tennessee ValleyAuthorityDavid Whiteley, Executive Director, Eastern Interconnection PlanningCollaborativeDiscussion Facilitator: Ward Jewell, Wichita State University12:15-1:15Lunch1:15-2:45Technology Session 3: Control and ProtectionOpening Presentation: Chris DeMarco, University of Wisconsin-MadisonDiscussion Panel:Bruce Fardanesh, Chief Technology Officer, New York Power AuthorityJay Giri, Director, Power System Technology, ALSTOM GridMladen Kezunovic, Texas A&M UniversitySakis Meliopoulos, Georgia TechDiscussion Facilitator: Jim McCalley, Iowa State University2:45-3:00Break3:00-4:30Technology Session 4: Communications and Information InfrastructureOpening Presentation: Lang Tong, Cornell UniversityDiscussion Panel:Jeff Gooding, IT General Manager of Smart Grid Engineering, SouthernCalifornia EdisonManimaran Govindarasu, Iowa State UniversityTom Overbye, University of Illinois at Urbana/ChampaignJeffrey Taft, Distinguished Engineer and Chief Architect, Cisco ConnectedEnergy Networks Business UnitDiscussion Facilitator: Peter Sauer, University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign4:30-6:00Poster session with light reception2

Thursday, June 287:15-8:00Registration. Coffee, Juice, Bagels, Fruit8:00-9:45Technology Session 5: Variable Generation IntegrationOpening Presentation: Shmuel Oren, University of California at BerkeleyDiscussion Panel:Duncan Callaway, University of California at BerkeleyHamid Elahi, General Manager, GE EnergyCharlie Smith, Executive Director, Utility Variable Generation Integration GroupMax Zhang, Cornell UniversityDiscussion Facilitator: Chris DeMarco, University of ogy Session 6: Computational ChallengesOpening Presentation: Santiago Grijalva, Georgia TechDiscussion Panel:Alejandro Dominguez-Garcia, University of Illinois at Urbana/ChampaignBrian Gaucher, Smart Energy Program Manager, IBMKip Morison, Chief Technology Officer, BC HydroSarah Ryan, Iowa State UniversityDiscussion Facilitator: Chris DeMarco, University of ce Session: Building the Future Grid WorkforcePresentations: Wanda Reder, Vice President, Power Systems Services, S&CElectric, and Chanan Singh, Texas A&M UniversityDiscussion Facilitator: Chanan Singh, Texas A&M University1:30-2:45Perspectives on Overcoming the Technology ChallengesSpeakers:Jay Giri, Director, Power System Technology, ALSTOM GridRobert J. Thomas, Cornell UniversityStephen Whitley, President and CEO, New York Independent SystemOperatorDiscussion Facilitator: Vijay Vittal2:45-3:00Review of Forum OutcomesVijay Vittal, Professor, Arizona State University, and Director, Power SystemsEngineering Research Center3

Future Grid Initiative Overview“The Future Grid to Enable Sustainable Energy Systems: An Initiative of the Power SystemsEngineering Research Center (PSERC)” is funded by the U.S. Department of Energy’s Office ofElectricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. For more information, go tohttp://www.pserc.org/research/FutureGrid.aspx.In this Initiative, PSERC will investigate requirements for a systematic transformation of today’selectric grid to enable high penetrations of sustainable energy systems. A giant transformationin the electric grid is underway. The grid is evolving away from a network architecture withrelatively few large, hierarchically-connected, tightly synchronized energy resources supplyinglarge, medium, and very many small passive consumers. It is evolving toward a network drivenby many highly variable distributed energy resources mixed with large central generationsources, energy storage, and responsive users equipped with embedded intelligence andautomation to meet their unique energy needs while co-existing and interacting within a complexdynamic network system.How the grid will evolve is an open question. In part, the future grid will be dependent on theresource technology decisions that can make a significant difference in the types of generationand demand resource technologies that are deployed. The working assumption of this proposalis that the future grid needs to support high penetrations of sustainable energy systems. Theevolution will also be affected by decision-making objectives and flexibility across the grid. Forexample, tight synchronicity and balancing constraints may be relaxed through an architecturebased on autonomous local energy clusters and microgrids that localize the quality standards.The future grid will also rely on an IT infrastructure with underlying communications networksthat will enable the physical network, and will closely interact and support the performanceobjectives of sustainable energy systems. Finally, regional differences in energy resources willaffect the requirements for the future grid.The effective transformation of the grid will require identification and solution of major operating,planning, workforce, and economic challenges. To seamlessly integrate renewable resources inthe grid, research and development must address challenges that high penetration levels ofthese energy resources will have in power system planning and operation, and in gridinterconnection. Furthermore, new tools must be developed that explicitly account for theuncertainty and associated risks with such high levels of renewable resource penetration. Theexisting workforce and the students going into power and energy engineering careers need tobe educated so that they can envision and develop the new approaches and technologies tomaintain grid reliability and economy. There will need to be adaptation by the distributedresources and consumers, and by smart delivery technologies to avoid barriers detrimental tothe energy system objectives. Many digital technologies are fairly mature and could be utilizedto enable such adaptation. What is missing are basic problem formulations, modeling, analysisand decision support tools as enablers of such adaptation.Engineering the envisioned sustainable energy systems is a problem of highly complexheterogeneous and dynamic network systems in an uncertain environment with diverse anddistributed objectives. PSERC researchers will use their knowledge of today’s operating andplanning paradigms for electric power grids, as well as their knowledge of today’s SCADA,EMS, DMS, and market systems, as the starting point for introducing new paradigms andtransition strategies from today’s legacy systems.4

Future Grid Research Areas and Tasks Thrust Area 1: Electric Energy Challenges of the Future (Leader: Gerald Heydt,Arizona State Univ.)o Integrating Transmission and Distribution Engineering Eventualities (Gerald Heydt,Arizona State Univ.)o Robust and Dynamic Reserve Requirements (Kory Hedman, Arizona State Univ.)o A National Transmission Overlay (Jim McCalley, Iowa State Univ.)o Wide Area Control Systems (Mani Venkatasubramanian, Washington State Univ.) Thrust Area 2: Control and Protection Paradigms of the Future (Leader: ChrisDeMarco, Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison)o Requirements for Hierarchical Coordinated Control and Protection of the Smart Grid(Anjan Bose, Washington State Univ.)o Hierarchical Coordinated Control of Wind Energy Resources and Storage forElectromechanical Stability Enhancement of the Grid (Chris DeMarco, Univ. ofWisconsin-Madison)o Hierarchical Coordinated Protection of the Smart Grid with High Penetration ofRenewable Resources (Mladen Kezunovic, Texas A&M Univ.) Thrust Area 3: Renewable Energy Integration and the Impact of Carbon Regulationon the Electric Grid (Leader: Shmuel Oren, Univ. of California at Berkeley)o Mitigating Renewables Intermittency Through Non-Disruptive Distributed LoadControl (Duncan Callaway, Univ. of California at Berkeley)o Probabilistic Simulation Methodology for Evaluating the Impact of RenewableIntermittency on Operations and Planning (George Gross, Univ. of Illinois atUrbana/Champaign)o Planning and Market Design for Using Dispatchable Loads to Meet RenewablePortfolio Standards and Emissions Reduction Targets (Tim Mount, Cornell Univ.)o Direct and Telemetric Coupling of Renewable Energy Supply with DeferrableDemand (Shmuel Oren, Univ. of California at Berkeley) Thrust Area 4: Workforce Development (Leader: Chanan Singh, Texas A&M Univ.)o PSERC Academy: A Virtual Library of Thousands of Short Videos (Raja Ayyanar,Arizona State Univ.)o A Course in Energy Economics (James Bushnell, Iowa State Univ.)o Comprehensive Educational Tools for Reliability Modeling and Evaluation of theEmerging Smart Grid (Chanan Singh, Texas A&M Univ.)o Synchrophasor Education for Students and Professionals (Mladen Kezunovic, TexasA&M Univ.)o Energy Processing for Smart Grid Technology (James Momoh, Howard Univ.)o Course Development - Critical Infrastructure Security: The Emerging Smart Grid(Anurag Srivastava, Washington State Univ.) Thrust Area 5: Computational Challenges and Analysis Under Increasingly Dynamicand Uncertain Electric Power System Conditions (Leader: Santiago Grijalva, GeorgiaInstitute of Technology)o Real-Time PMU-Based Tools for Monitoring Operational Reliability (Alejandro D.Dominguez-Garcia, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign)o Decision-Making Framework for the Future Grid (Santiago Grijalva, Georgia Instituteof Technology)5

oo Hierarchical Probabilistic Coordination and Optimization of DERs and SmartAppliances (Sakis Meliopoulos, Georgia Institute of Technology)Computational Issues of Optimization for Planning (Sarah Ryan, Iowa State Univ.)Thrust Area 6: Engineering Resilient Cyber-Physical Systems (Leader: Tom Overbye,Univ. of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign)o Operational and Planning Considerations for Resiliency (Ian Dobson, Iowa StateUniv.)o Resiliency with Respect to Low Frequency, High Consequence Events (TomOverbye, Univ. of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign)o Improved Power Grid Resiliency through Interactive System Control (Vijay Vittal,Arizona State Univ.)Broad Analysis: A White Paper Collection The Information Hierarchy for the Future Grid (Leader: Peter Sauer, Univ. of Illinois atUrbana-Champaign)o Cyber-Physical Systems Security for the Smart Grid (Manimaran Govindarasu, IowaState Univ.)o Communication Needs and Integration Options for AMI in the Smart Grid (VinodNamboodiri, Wichita State Univ.)o Information and Computation Structures for the Smart Grid (Lang Tong, CornellUniv.)o Networked Information Gathering and Fusion of PMU Measurements (JunshanZhang, Arizona State Univ.) Grid Enablers of Sustainable Energy Systems (Leader: Jim McCalley, Iowa State Univ.)o Primary and Secondary Control for High Penetration Renewables (Chris DeMarco,Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison)o Toward Standards for Dynamics in Electric Energy Systems (Marija Ilic, CarnegieMellon Univ.)o Future Grid: The Environment (Ward Jewell, Wichita State Univ.)o High Capacity Interregional Transmission Design: Benefits, Risks and PossiblePaths Forward (Jim McCalley, Iowa State Univ.)o Distributed and Centralized Generation – A Comparison Approach (James Momoh,Howard Univ.)6

Bibliography from the PSERC Future Grid Initiative(as of 6/24/2012)All of the materials listed below are available at the PSERC Future Grid Initiative website.Thrust Areas and Tasks (web link)Research in the Future Grid Initiative, supported by the Office of Electricity Delivery andEnergy Reliability, U.S. DOE, is divided into thrust areas. Each thrust area has tasks in whichresearch is being conducted on a particular topic. The overall final report will be ready in thefall of 2013.Available Thrust Area White Papers: Technology Challenges in Designing the Future Grid to Enable Sustainable EnergySystems. This is a synthesis of the technology challenges in the thrust areas. Electric Energy Challenges of the Future Renewable Energy Integration and the Impact of Carbon Regulation on the ElectricGrid Workforce Development - Meeting the Educational Challenge of the Smart SustainableGrid Computational Challenges and Analysis under Increasingly Dynamic and UncertainElectric Power System Conditions Engineering Resilient Cyber-Physical SystemsBroad Analysis White Papers and Webinars (web link)As a part of the Future Grid Initiative, PSERC is working to stimulate thought about solutionsto what can be called “broad analysis” needs. A broad analysis need covers questions that aretypically well beyond the scope of typical academic research projects in terms of size anddefinition. The questions are not strictly engineering, often involving issues of policy as well asstakeholder perspectives and impacts.Available White Papers on the Topic “The Information Hierarchy for the Future Grid” Cyber-Physical Systems Security for the Smart Grid Communication Needs and Integration Options for AMI in the Smart Grid Networked Information Gathering and Fusion of PMU DataAvailable White Papers on the Topic “Grid Enablers of Sustainable Energy Systems” Transmission Design at the National Level: Benefits, Risks and Possible PathsForward Primary and Secondary Control for High Penetration Renewables Future Grid: The Environment Toward Standards for Dynamics in Electric Energy Systems Distributed and Centralized Generation - A Comparison Approach7

ABOUT PSERChttp://www.pserc.orgOur core purpose:Empowering minds to engineerthe future electric energy systemWhat’s important to us:Pursuing, discovering and transferring knowledgeProducing highly qualified and trained engineersCollaborating in all we doWhat we’re working toward:An efficient, secure, resilient, adaptable, and economic electric powerinfrastructure serving societyA new generation of educated technical professionalsin electric powerKnowledgeable decision-makerson critical energy policy issuesSustained, quality university programsin electric power engineering8

PSERC’s Industry Members in 2012ABBALSTOM GridAmerican Electric PowerMidwest ISONational Renewal Energy Lab (NREL)National Rural Electric Coop. Assn.(NRECA)New York ISONew York Power AuthorityPacific Gas & Electric CompanyPJM InterconnectionPowerWorld CorporationRTE-FranceSalt River ProjectSan Diego Gas & ElectricSouthern California EdisonSouthern CompanySouthwest Power PoolTennessee Valley AuthorityTri-State Generation and TransmissionU.S. Department of EnergyWestern Area Power AdministrationAmerican Transmission CompanyArizona Public ServiceBC HydroBonneville Power AdministrationCalifornia ISOCenterPoint EnergyCISCO SystemsDuke EnergyEntergyEPRIExelonFirst Energy CorporationGE EnergyInstitut de Recherche d’Hydro-QuebecISO New EnglandLawrence Livermore National LabCollaborating Universities and Site DirectorsArizona State(Jerry Heydt)Colorado School of Mines(P.K. Sen)Howard Univ.(James Momoh)Texas A&M(Mladen Kezunovic)Wisconsin(Chris DeMarco)Berkeley(Shmuel Oren)Cornell(Lang Tong)Illinois(Peter Sauer)Washington State(Anjan Bose)Carnegie Mellon(Marija Ilic)Georgia Tech(Sakis Meliopoulos)Iowa State(Venkataramana Ajjarapu)Wichita State(Ward Jewell)Director, Deputy Director, Founding DirectorVijay Vittal, PSERC Director, Arizona State University (Vijay.Vittal@asu.edu, 480-965-1879Dennis Ray, Deputy Director (djray@engr.wisc.edu, 608-265-3808)Robert J. Thomas, Cornell University, Founding Director9

Intentionally Blank10

Forum Presentationsand Panelist Comments11

Table of Contents for Presentation MaterialsTitlePageOverview of the PSERC Future Grid Initiative, Vijay Vittal13Technology Session 1: Power Delivery Infrastructure, Jerry Heydt31Panel Comments41Technology Session 2: Operations and Planning, Jim McCalleyPanel Comments4553Technology Session 3: Control and Protection, Chris DeMarcoPanel Comments5767Technology Session 4: Communications and Information Infrastructure, Lang TongPanel Comments6979Technology Session 5: Variable Generation Integration, Shmuel OrenPanel Comments8195Technology Session 6: Computational Challenges, Santiago GrijalvaPanel Comments97107Workforce Session: Building the Future Grid Workforce, Chanan SinghNote: Any additional presentation materials will be available on the PSERC website.12109

Future Grid InitiativeTechnology Challenges in Designingthe Future Grid to Enable SustainableEnergy SystemsVijay VittalDirector, Power Systems Engineering Research CenterIra A. Fulton Chair Professor, Arizona State UniversityFuture Grid ForumJune 27-28, 2012Washington D.C.Forum Objectives Identify the technological challenges to meet therequirements of the future grid Describe and receive comments regarding thechallenges being addressed in the PSERCFuture Grid Initiative and any results that havealready been achieved Identify challenges beyond the Future GridInitiative and determine whether thosechallenges are being addressed Explore how solutions to these challenges couldintegrate seamlessly into a legacy system213

Your feedback is important Panelists will provide comments. Audience will be invited to participate in afacilitated discussion and provide writtenfeedback. Ideas will be captured on flipcharts.3National Energy ChallengesEnergy independence, affordabilityEnergy reliability, security, efficiencyEconomic developmentand job securityEnvironmental concernsand impact of climate changeAging infrastructure, technologychange, workforce needs414

Range of Energy Solution OptionsRenewable resource technologiesEnergy efficiencyDemand resourcesMarket solutionsNuclear energy technologiesDevelop domestic resourcesImproved asset utilizationElectric transportationCarbon capture and storageEnergy storage5Overarching Issues Given this set of national energy solutions,how does the electric grid infrastructureevolve to accommodate these solutions? What elements constitute the buildingblocks of this evolution? Given the large capital investment in thelegacy grid, what steps are required toseamlessly transition from the legacygrid to accommodate the elements of theproposed building blocks?615

Critical Elements of the Evolution T&D additions and changes Energy storage Enhanced control/communications Handling increased uncertaintyDrivers of theevolution/changesNeededevolution/changes tosupport thiselement Renewable resources Retirement of aging conventional plants Questions regarding nuclear addition Carbon regulation7Critical Elements of the Evolution Expanding digital economy Power quality and reliability needs Demand flexibility Electric vehiclesDrivers of theevolution/changesNeededevolution/changes tosupport thiselement Economic constraints Changing customer needs Green awareness and demand Need for higher reliability and efficiency816

Critical Elements of the EvolutionNeededevolution/ Expanding footprintchanges to Impact of marketssupport Tighter operating limitsthis Greater reliance on communication and control element Need for advanced analytical toolsDrivers of theevolution/changes Spatio-temporal constraints Computational complexity Stochastic nature of variables Need to contain cost9Critical Elements of the Evolution Reduce footprint of disruptions Reliability of communication and control Reduced duration of disruptions Guard against malicious attacksNeededevolution/changes tosupport thiselementDrivers of the Shortage of skilled personnelevolution/ Inadequate analytical toolschanges Interdependence of cyber-physicalsystems1710

Future Grid Initiative – Thrust AreasThrust Area 1- Electric EnergyChallenges of the Future Transmission system design Substantive changes in power distributionsystem design Dynamic balancing of load and generation Wide area controls, including integrativecontrols in transmission and distributionsystems11Future Grid Initiative – Thrust AreasThrust Area 2 - Control and ProtectionParadigms of the Future Requirements for the communication andcomputation architecture for hierarchicalcoordinated control and protection Hierarchical coordinated control of transientstability Hierarchical coordinated protection1218

Future Grid Initiative – Thrust AreasThrust Area 3 - Renewable EnergyIntegration and the Impact of CarbonRegulation on the Electric Grid The potential of harnessing the inherentflexibility of certain load types, such as heatingand cooling and PHEV charging The deployment of distributed and systemlevel storage devices to mitigate the variability Uncertainty of renewable resources13Future Grid Initiative – Thrust AreasThrust Area 4 - Workforce Development Development of educational tools to meet theneeds of the current and future engineerswho will be managing these complex cyberphysical systems as well as innovating tobring further transformations1419

Future Grid Initiative – Thrust AreasThrust Area 5 - Computational Challengesand Analysis Under Increasingly Dynamicand Uncertain Electric Power SystemConditions Decision making framework for the future grid Computational issues of optimization for planning Hierarchical probabilistic coordination and optimization ofDERs and smart appliances Real-time PMU-based tools for monitoring operationalreliability15Future Grid Initiative – Thrust AreasThrust Area 6 - Engineering ResilientCyber-Physical Systems Low frequency high consequence event Resiliency with respect to preventingcascading failures Monitoring and control to increase gridresiliency1620

Broad Analysis Work Stimulating thought about solutions to“broad analysis” needs Broad analysis topics: The information hierarchy of the futuregrid Grid enablers of sustainable energysystems White papers and archived webinarsavailable on the PSERC website17Technology Challenges Key technology challenges associatedwith the activities of each thrust area Important objective of seamless transitioninto the legacy grid1821

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 1 National transmission overlay? Technology to use AC versus DC If AC, consideration of ultra high voltage levels, six phase and relatedpoly-phase transmission If DC, consideration of multi-terminal DC and meshed DCtransmission Need for a DC circuit breaker Implications of the use of high temperature, low sag conductors Utilization of compact transmission designs to optimize hard to findright of way19Thrust Area 1 – Contd. Robust and dynamic reserve requirements Determination of an optimal reserve requirement Examination of reliability criteria associated with reserverequirements Probabilistic risk assessment of reserve requirements Wide area control Designing robust, coordinated, and reliable wide area controlsTailoring wide area controls to dedicated applicationsLocating wide area controlsCoordination of wide area controlsReal time adaptation of wide area controls2022

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 1 – contd. Critical need for high levels of energy storage at the bulkpower level Need for high energy density storage other than pumped hydro inthe Gigawatt-days range Economically viable energy storage Determination of the level of renewable resource penetration andassociated variability that would render the cost to benefit ratio ofenergy storage to favorable ranges21Key Challenges in Thrust Area 2 Communication and computational requirements forhierarchical coordinated control and protection Requirements on communication latency and quality of service Robust communication networks with associated softwaredevelopment Design and development of databases to handle massive volumes ofdata Communication requirements within control areas and associatedconstraints on latency, bandwidth, protocols and communicationstechnology Needed enhancements for simulation and design applications tosupport control and protection applications Simulations tools to analyze interdependent cyber-physical systemsto examine required performance aspects Cyber security requirements2223

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 2 Hierarchical decomposition of protection systems Predictive protectionInherently adaptive protectionCorrective protectionNew architectures for coordinated hierarchical protectionsystems23Key Challenges in Thrust Area 3 Exploiting demand side flexibility as a hedge againstrenewable resource supply uncertainty instead of usingconventional generation resources Is this paradigm shift viable?Optimal strategies needed to operate the system reliablyBusiness models needed to aggregate load flexibilityCentralized versus decentralized approach comparison Utilizing non-disruptive distributed load control tomitigate renewable resource variability Developing high fidelity models for thermostatically-controlledloads Evaluating the ability of such loads to provide the desired benefit How well would load control work in comparison to the samecontrol achieved by generators? What are infrastructure needs for implementing this approach?2424

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 3 – contd. Market design to utilize dispatchable loads to meetrenewable portfolio standards and emission reductiontargets Can variability of renewable resources be accuratelycharacterized stochastically? Can future needs for frequency regulation and generation/loadfollowing be accurately estimated under different renewableresource penetration levels and emission targets? Can dispatchable loads be aggregated in order to examineengineering/economic feasibility?25Key Challenges in Thrust Area 3 – contd. Need for stochastic optimization tools for planning andoperation Adequate representation of system complexity Representation of production costing and reliability assessment Consideration of correlated behavior of loads and supplyresources Validity of analysis over a time horizon Guaranteeing computational tractability2625

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 4 Steps to tackle the projected workforce shortage Need to address workforce needs across the spectrum – skilledworkers, engineers and managers Play to our strengths of meeting needs at the BS, MS and PhDlevels U.S. power engineering academic workforce is also graying Curriculum redesign to meet the needs of the future grid Need solid grounding in basic power engineering fundamentals Evolve curriculum to address needs in complementarydisciplinary areas which are essential in engineering the grid ofthe future27Key Challenges in Thrust Area 4 – contd. Leverage PSERC’s broad spectrum of expertise todevelop relevant and appropriate material to meet theinterdisciplinary needs of education to engineer thefuture grid E-learning techniques Online course material Textbooks In addition to updating university curriculum, criticalneed to provide life-long learning experiences to thepracticing engineer Self-paced online material Short courses Textbooks2826

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 5 A decision-making framework for the future grid Should be designed to meet the goals and objectives of thefuture grid Ability to address both spatial and temporal scales of theproblem Ability to handle decision complexity Capability to fill the technology gaps in existing tools andprovide for a seamless transition Flexibility to handle massive streams of data Consideration of demand as a resource Computational issues associated with optimization andplanning Incorporating uncertainty Concomitant consideration of market implications of planningdecisions results in significant computational complexity29Key Challenges in Thrust Area 5 – contd. Coordination and optimization of distributed energyresources and smart appliances Need for a hierarchical probabilistic approach Ability to level total load, utilize most efficient units and controlgreenhouse gas emission Minimize losses in distribution systems Capability to provide ancillary services Maximize reliability Utilization of real time PMU measurements formonitoring operational reliability Leverage the large national investment in PMUs Develop efficient application tools for a range operationalreliability problems – system loadability, online security analysis Accuracy of developed tools need to be established3027

Key Challenges in Thrust Area 6 Building resiliency to high impact, low-frequency events Identifying events that could result in vulnerabilities to the system Designing and developing monitoring capability to sense suchevents Preventive or corrective control strategies to mitigate impact ofsuch eve

Jun 24, 2012 · Technology Challenges in Designing the Future Grid to Enable Sustainable Energy Systems. This is a synthesis of the technology challenges in the thrust areas. Electric Energy Challenges of the Future Renewable Energy Integration and the

Related Documents:

May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)

Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .

On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.

̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions

Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have

Chính Văn.- Còn đức Thế tôn thì tuệ giác cực kỳ trong sạch 8: hiện hành bất nhị 9, đạt đến vô tướng 10, đứng vào chỗ đứng của các đức Thế tôn 11, thể hiện tính bình đẳng của các Ngài, đến chỗ không còn chướng ngại 12, giáo pháp không thể khuynh đảo, tâm thức không bị cản trở, cái được

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.

Le genou de Lucy. Odile Jacob. 1999. Coppens Y. Pré-textes. L’homme préhistorique en morceaux. Eds Odile Jacob. 2011. Costentin J., Delaveau P. Café, thé, chocolat, les bons effets sur le cerveau et pour le corps. Editions Odile Jacob. 2010. 3 Crawford M., Marsh D. The driving force : food in human evolution and the future.