For The - Redbridge London Borough Council
Joint Waste Development PlanLocal Plan/Local Development FrameworkLondon Borough of Barking & DagenhamLondon Borough of HaveringLondon Borough of NewhamLondon Borough of RedbridgeJoint Waste Development Planfor theEast London Waste AuthorityBoroughsAdopted February 2012
Joint Waste Development PlanFor further information please refer to your Council’s v.ukwww.newham.gov.ukwww.redbridge.gov.uk2Joint Waste Development Plan
Joint Waste Development PlanIntroductionContentsPage01 Introduction .5What is the Joint Waste Development Plan Document (DPD)?.5Who has prepared the Joint Waste DPD?.5Borough Local Development Frameworks.602 Background .9Waste Policy Context.9Scope of the Joint Waste DPD.13Sustainability Appraisal.1403 Strategic objectives .1604 Future waste management requirements.19How much waste will we need to manage at 2021?.19What facilities will we need?.20What waste management technologies and facilities?.24Where should new facilities be located?.2605 Policies.2706 Monitoring and implementation.37Looking ahead.37Monitoring.38Indicators and targets.39Delivery organisations.41Schedule 1.43Schedule 2.45Abbreviations and Terms .46Appendix 1 Site Plans.51Appendix 2 Schedule of saved and superseded UDP policies.573Adopted February 2012
Joint Waste Development Plan01IntroductionIntroductionWhat is the Joint Waste Development Plan Document (DPD)?1.1The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 requires local authorities to replacethe existing Unitary Development Plan (UDP) with the Local Development Framework(LDF). The LDF includes DPDs, which must include specific waste policies which areconsistent with PPS10 and in General Conformity with the London Plan.1.2The purpose of the Joint Waste DPD is to set out a planning strategy to 2021 forsustainable waste management which enables the adequate provision of wastemanagement facilities (including disposal) in appropriate locations for municipal andcommercial and industrial waste, having regard to the London Plan Borough levelapportionment and construction, excavation and demolition and hazardous wastes.The Joint Waste DPD forms part of the LDF for each borough and helps deliver therelevant elements of the Sustainable Community Strategy for each borough.Who has prepared the Joint Waste DPD?1.3The Joint Waste DPD has been developed by the four East London WasteAuthority (ELWA) boroughs of LB Barking & Dagenham, Havering, Newham andRedbridge. The decision to work together was established through the boroughs’Local Development Schemes and builds on the positive working relationship alreadyestablished between these boroughs as part of ELWA.Map 1:East London Waste Authority boroughs, Olympic area (LB Newham) and the LondonThames Gateway Development Corporation areaAdopted February 20125
IntroductionJoint Waste Development PlanBorough Local Plan/Local Development Frameworks1.4The Joint Waste DPD is part of each borough’s Local Plan/Local DevelopmentFramework, however it differs from other borough DPDs as it sets waste managementtargets and allocates sites suitable for waste development for implementation acrossall of the four boroughs. Table 1 below shows borough-specific DPDs prepared orcurrently under development. Additional DPDs may also be prepared for each boroughas required.Table 1: Summary of Development Plan Documents and status for each boroughBoroughDocumentsBarking & Dagenham Core Strategy (Adopted July 2010) Borough Wide Development Policies DPD (Adopted March2011) Site Specific Allocations (Adopted December 2010) Barking Town Centre Area Action Plan (Adopted February2011)Havering Newham Core Strategy (Adopted January 2012)Redbridge Core Strategy (Adopted March 2008) Borough Wide Primary Policies DPD (Adopted May 2008) Development Sites with Housing Capacity(Adopted May 2008) Development Opportunity Sites (Adopted May 2008) Ilford Town Centre Area Action Plan (Adopted May 2008) Gants Hill Area Action Plan (Adopted March 2009) Crossrail Corridor Area Action Plan (Adopted September2011) Minerals DPD (Submission)Core Strategy (Adopted, July 2008)Site Specific Allocations (Adopted, July 2008)Development Control Policies (Adopted October 2008)Romford Area Action Plan (Adopted October 2008)6Joint Waste Development Plan
Joint Waste Development PlanIntroduction1.5All boroughs have an adopted Statement of Community Involvement. Theconsultation process for the development of the Joint Waste DPD was consistent withthe requirements as set out in each borough’s SCI.1.6Details of other documents referred to throughout this document are detailed below:1.7 Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management(ODPM, July 2005) The London Plan (GLA July 2011) Building the Evidence Base and Identifying the Issues & OptionsConsultation Document (May 2007)Technical Report (October 2006)Sustainability Appraisal Interim Report: An appraisal of the Issues and Options(May 2007)Report on Consultation (November 2007) Preferred OptionsPreferred Options Report (April 2008)Sustainability Appraisal of Preferred Options (April 2008)Site Assessment to inform Preferred Options (June 2007)Sustainability Appraisal of reasonable alternative sites (July 2007)Preferred Options Technical Report (April 2008) Proposed Submission DocumentsProposed Submission Joint Waste DPDJoint Waste DPD MapSustainability Appraisal of the Joint Waste DPDTechnical ReportThe Joint Waste DPD was adopted on the following dates: 19 January 2012(Redbridge); 1 February 2012 (Havering); 22 February 2012 (Barking and Dagenham);and 27 February 2012 (Newham).7Adopted February 2012
Joint Waste Development Plan02BackgroundBackgroundWaste Policy Context2.1The Joint Waste DPD is influenced by, and needs to have regard to, the relevantpolicies, plans and programmes at international, national, regional and local levels. Asummary of the key policies, plans and programmes are detailed below.EU legislation2.2The Waste Framework Directive [75/442/EEC] is the principal EU legislation forwaste and requires measures to ensure that waste is recovered or disposed of withoutendangering human health or causing harm to the environment. A key principle of thedirective is the waste hierarchy, with the objective to manage waste as near to the topof the hierarchy as possible.The Waste HierarchyReduceReuseRecycling & CompostingEnergy RecoveryDisposal The most effective environmental solution is often to reduce the generation of waste –reduce Products and materials can sometimes be used again, for the same or a differentpurpose – reuse Resources can often be recovered from waste – recycling and composting Value can also be recovered by generating energy from waste – energy recovery Only if none of the above offer an appropriate solution should waste be disposed of9Adopted February 2012
BackgroundJoint Waste Development PlanNational Policy2.3The UK Sustainable Development Strategy 1 sets out the overarching approachto sustainable development. The Waste Strategy for England 2007 was publishedfollowing a comprehensive review of Waste Strategy 2000. The key objectives areto decouple waste growth from economic growth and put more emphasis on wasteprevention and reuse; increase diversion of municipal and non-municipal waste fromlandfill; secure investment in waste infrastructure; and to get the most environmentalbenefit from the investment through increased recycling of resources and recovery ofenergy from residual waste. The Waste Strategy sets national targets for recycling andcomposting of household waste and the recovery of municipal waste.2.4Planning Policy Statement 10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Managementestablishes key planning objectives through which planning authorities should prepareand deliver their planning strategies. PPS10 recognises that positive planning has animportant role in delivering sustainable waste management through the developmentof appropriate strategies for growth, regeneration and prudent use of resources, and byproviding sufficient opportunities for new waste management facilities of the right type,in the right place and at the right time.2.5PPS10 reflects many of the principles of the Waste Framework Directive and requireswaste planning authorities to identify suitable site opportunities for waste managementfacilities.Regional policy2.6The London Plan provides the strategic framework for the preparation of localDevelopment Plan Documents (DPD). The Plan identifies the waste managementfacilities required to satisfy the identified need and distribution across the region.2.7The London Plan (2011) provides planning policies for waste management whichboroughs must be in general conformity with, including the tonnages of municipal andcommercial and industrial waste to be managed by each London borough, revisedtargets for recycling of municipal waste and new targets for recycling of commercialand industrial waste and recycling or reuse of construction and demolition waste.2.8The London Plan encourages the regeneration of east London, concentratingdevelopment in ‘Opportunity Areas’, of which Barking Reach, London Riverside,Ilford, Lower Lea Valley, Royal Docks and Stratford are located within the ELWAboroughs. Opportunity Areas are identified on the basis that they are capable ofaccommodating substantial numbers of new jobs and/or homes and their potentialshould be maximised.1Securing the Future - the UK Government Sustainable Development Strategy (March 2005)10Joint Waste Development Plan
Joint Waste Development PlanBackgroundAdjoining regional or local policy2.9It is important for the Joint Waste DPD to take into account the relevant strategies andplans of adjoining areas. The key waste planning policies from adjoining areas aredetailed below:Thurrock Core Strategy Issues and Options ConsultationProposes to reduce the use of landfill including importation of London’s waste to landfillresidues by 2015 and only if landfill capacity is still available. It was favoured by 71% ofrespondents. The Essex Waste Development Plan is currently in preparation.North London Waste Plan – Issues & Options ConsultationQuestion 4 asks whether North London should identify just enough land to meet itsapportionment or identify more land as good practice for contingency reasons and/orto achieve a greater level of self sufficiency within North London. If the North LondonWaste Plan identifies additional land it may result in a reduced apportionment to EastLondon boroughs if the London Plan apportionment is reviewed.Local policy2.10 Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Development Frameworks recognises theLocal Development Framework as a key component in the delivery of each borough’sSustainable Community Strategy and requires Local Development Documents toexpress those elements of the Community Strategy that relate to the development anduse of land.2.11 The preparation of each borough Core Strategy reflects their Sustainable CommunityStrategy.London Borough of Barking & DagenhamBarking and Dagenham’s Sustainable Community Strategy, The Community Plan(2009 Agreed Version) has six aims, one of which is to work together for a clean,green and environmentally sustainable borough. As part of this the Partnership willbe focusing on reducing the amount of waste that goes to landfill and reducing howmuch carbon dioxide is released into the environment. The rate of recycling (NI192) in2008/09 was 25%, increasing to 32% in 2009/10.London Borough of HaveringHavering’s Sustainable Community Strategy (2008 -2013) states that the LocalStrategic Partnership (LSP) wishes to ensure a clean, safe and green borough. Highrecycling rates will reduce the burden we place on landfill and the Council will invest innew ways of improving recycling rates. The rate of recycling (NI192) in 2007/08 was23.98%, increasing to 27.37% in 2008/09 and 34.35% in 2009/10.11Adopted February 2012
BackgroundJoint Waste Development PlanLondon Borough of NewhamNewham Sustainable Community Strategy (2010-2030) states that the LSP wishes tohelp residents and businesses to minimise waste arisings and to recycle in the easiestand most cost effective way. The Council is examining ways to reduce the amount ofwaste produced, improve how it is disposed of and improve access to recycling. Therate of recycling (NI192) increased from 16% in 2008/9 to 19% between April andNovember 2009; the baseline (2007/8) rate was 15%.London Borough of RedbridgeThe Redbridge Sustainable Community Strategy (SCS) (2008-2018) sets an ambitionto promote a positive attitude to the environment and have a cleaner, greenerRedbridge. As part of this ambition the strategy makes a commitment to reduce wasteproduction and increase recycling. The SCS provides the overarching framework for allLocal Development Documents, and the Joint Waste DPD will assist with the deliveryof its priorities. The 2009/10 AMR showed that the recycling and composting rate inRedbridge was 31.5%, which was an increase from 26.2% in 2008/09, but below the40% national target.2.12 This Joint Waste DPD must be in conformity with borough Core Strategy policies.Borough Core Strategy policies of specific relevance to the Joint Waste DPD areoutlined below:Barking & Dagenham(Adopted July 2010)POLICY CR3: Sustainable Waste ManagementHavering(Adopted July 2008)Policy CP11: Sustainable Waste ManagementNewham(Adopted January 2012)Policy INF3: Waste and RecyclingRedbridge(Adopted March 2008)Strategic Policy 11: Waste12Joint Waste Development Plan
Joint Waste Development PlanBackground2.13 The ELWA Joint Waste Management Strategy details how the ELWA boroughsintend to manage municipal waste.Joint Waste Management Strategy (ELWA, February 2006)Scope of the Joint Waste DPD2.14 PPS10: Planning for Sustainable Waste Management requires the Joint Waste DPDto set out policies and proposals for waste management in line with the London Planand ensure sufficient opportunities for the provision of waste management facilities inappropriate locations.13Adopted February 2012
BackgroundJoint Waste Development Plan2.15 It is not necessary for the Joint Waste DPD to repeat or reformulate national or regionalpolicies, nor to address issues adequately covered in the London Plan or borough CoreStrategies2.2.16 London Plan Policy 5.17 requires the Joint Waste DPD to identify sufficient land toprovide capacity to manage the apportioned tonnages of municipal solid waste (MSW)and commercial and industrial (C&I) waste. Waste is deemed to be managed in Londonif it is used for energy recovery in London, or it is compost or recyclate sorted or bulkedin London material recycling facilities for reprocessing either in London or elsewhere.2.17 Although the London Plan borough level apportionment does not include construction,excavation and demolition waste (C, D&E) or hazardous waste streams, these areaddressed in London Plan Policy 5.18 and as such are included in the Joint Waste DPD.2.18 Further detail of these waste streams and their future management is in Chapter 4 ofthis document.Sustainability Appraisal2.19 Each stage in the preparation of the Joint Waste DPD has been subject toSustainability Appraisal, as required by Section 5a and 5b of the Planning andCompulsory Purchase Act, the Environmental Assessment of Plans and ProgrammesRegulations 2004 and incorporating the requirements of EU Directive 2001/42/EC onthe Assessment of the Effects of Certain Plans and Programmes on the Environment(commonly referred to as the Strategic Environmental [SEA] Directive). TheSustainability Appraisal documents form part of the evidence base to this DPD. Thekey recommendations of the Sustainability Appraisal are summarised below:Sustainability Appraisal Recommendations Encourage the reduction, reuse and recycling of waste produced by theconstruction industry Secure an appropriate range of facilities for the management of waste Allocate sufficient resources to waste issues Help facilitate the provision of ongoing education and practical advicerelating to waste Take into account proposals for an additional 54,000 new dwellings in theThames Gateway London area Include sustainable transport factors – particularly encouraging themovement of waste by rail and water – in site assessment for facilities Consider environmental separation buffers around suitable sites for wastemanagement facilitiesSource: From Table 2.1: Key Messages from the Context Review, Sustainability Appraisal of the JointWaste DPD Preferred Options, April 20082PPS12: Local Spatial Planning (2008) paras 4.30 and 5.114Joint Waste Development Plan
Joint Waste Development PlanBackground2.20 The Sustainability Appraisal of Preferred Options3 tested the DPD objectives, policiesand identified sites against the Sustainability Framework. The Appraisal suggestedmitigation measures which were incorporated into the development of this ProposedSubmission Document. A Final Sustainability Appraisal specifically relating to theProposed Submission Joint Waste DPD was also produced.Note: A Habitats Regulations Assessment of the Joint Waste DPD was undertaken todetermine whether the DPD will effect European biodiversity designations. The HRAwas developed in consultation with officers at Natural England.Joint Waste DPD Preferred Options – Sustainability Appraisal Report (Scott Wilson Ltd with LandUse Consultants, April 2008)3Adopted February 201215
Strategic ObjectivesJoint Waste Development Plan033.1Strategic ObjectivesThe evidence base revealed that there is a need to provide additional waste treatmentcapacity within the ELWA area to manage waste without endangering human healthor the environment and to enable communities to take responsibility for the wasteproduced.Vision StatementThe vision for the East London Joint Waste Development Plan Documentis that it aims to manage waste produced in the boroughs of Barking andDagenham, Havering, Newham and Redbridge in line with the growth set outin the boroughs’ adopted and emerging Local Development Framework CoreStrategi
London Borough of Havering Havering’s Sustainable Community Strategy (2008 -2013) states that the Local Strategic Partnership (LSP) wishes to ensure a clean, safe and green borough. High recycling rates will reduce the burden we place on landfill and the Council will invest in new ways of improving recycling rates.
May 02, 2018 · D. Program Evaluation ͟The organization has provided a description of the framework for how each program will be evaluated. The framework should include all the elements below: ͟The evaluation methods are cost-effective for the organization ͟Quantitative and qualitative data is being collected (at Basics tier, data collection must have begun)
Silat is a combative art of self-defense and survival rooted from Matay archipelago. It was traced at thé early of Langkasuka Kingdom (2nd century CE) till thé reign of Melaka (Malaysia) Sultanate era (13th century). Silat has now evolved to become part of social culture and tradition with thé appearance of a fine physical and spiritual .
On an exceptional basis, Member States may request UNESCO to provide thé candidates with access to thé platform so they can complète thé form by themselves. Thèse requests must be addressed to esd rize unesco. or by 15 A ril 2021 UNESCO will provide thé nomineewith accessto thé platform via their émail address.
̶The leading indicator of employee engagement is based on the quality of the relationship between employee and supervisor Empower your managers! ̶Help them understand the impact on the organization ̶Share important changes, plan options, tasks, and deadlines ̶Provide key messages and talking points ̶Prepare them to answer employee questions
Dr. Sunita Bharatwal** Dr. Pawan Garga*** Abstract Customer satisfaction is derived from thè functionalities and values, a product or Service can provide. The current study aims to segregate thè dimensions of ordine Service quality and gather insights on its impact on web shopping. The trends of purchases have
Brady Township Bridgewater Borough Brighton Township (PA IBerwick I Township I PA PA PA PA PA PA PA PA I PA 1 Bethel Park I Borough I Broad Top City Borough Brookville Borough Brothers Valley Township Buffmgton Township Bumham Borough Bumside Borough Burnside Township Butler Township IPA IBigRun 1 Borough I I PA IBialer
Bruksanvisning för bilstereo . Bruksanvisning for bilstereo . Instrukcja obsługi samochodowego odtwarzacza stereo . Operating Instructions for Car Stereo . 610-104 . SV . Bruksanvisning i original
Introduction In this unit we shall try to know about Aristotle and his life and works and also understand about the relationship between Criticism and Creativity. We shall see how criticism is valued like creative writings. We shall know the role and place given to 'the critic' in the field of literary criticism.
